Next Article in Journal
How Does the Composition of Asset Portfolios Affect Household Consumption: Evidence from China Based on Micro Data
Previous Article in Journal
India’s Urban System: Sustainability and Imbalanced Growth of Cities
Open AccessReview

Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature

Transport and Roads, Department of Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Box118, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(7), 2944;
Received: 17 February 2020 / Revised: 31 March 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 7 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Transportation)
Research into the bicycle level-of-service (BLOS) has been extensively conducted over the last three decades. This research has mostly focused on user perceptions of comfort to provide guidance for decision-makers and planners. Segments and nodes were studied first, followed by a network evaluation. Besides these investigations, several variables have also been utilized to depict the users’ perspectives within the BLOS field, along with other cycling research domains that simultaneously scrutinized the users’ preferences. This review investigates the variables and indices employed in the BLOS area in relation to the field of bicycle flow and comfort research. Despite general agreement among existing BLOS variables and the adopted indices, several important research gaps remain to be filled. First, BLOS indices are often categorized based on transport components, while scarce attention has been paid to BLOS studies in trip-end facilities such as bicycle parking facilities. The importance of these facilities has been highlighted instead within research related to comfort. Second, the advantages of separated bike facilities have been proven in many studies; however, scarce research has addressed the challenges associated with them (e.g., the heterogeneity within those facilities due to the presence of electric bikes and electric scooters). This issue is clearly noticeable within the research regarding flow studies. Furthermore, network evaluation (in comparison to segment and node indices) has been studied to a lesser extent, whereas issues such as connectivity can be evaluated mainly through a holistic approach to the system. This study takes one step toward demonstrating the importance of the integration of similar research domains in the BLOS field to eliminate the aforementioned shortcomings. View Full-Text
Keywords: bicycle; level-of-service; traffic flow; comfort; quality-of-service; cycling bicycle; level-of-service; traffic flow; comfort; quality-of-service; cycling
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kazemzadeh, K.; Laureshyn, A.; Winslott Hiselius, L.; Ronchi, E. Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2944.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop