Next Article in Journal
Train-Induced Building Vibration and Radiated Noise by Considering Soil Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Rural Sustainable Environmental Management
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Business Model Based on Digital Twin Platform Network: The Inspiration from Haier’s Case Study in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Safety Guarantee System of Drinking Water Source in Three Gorges Reservoir Area and Its Application in Huangjuedu Drinking Water Source Area
Article

Assessment of Soil and Water Conservation Practices in the Loess Hilly Region Using a Coupled Rainfall-Runoff-Erosion Model

1
Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
2
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
3
Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainable Communities, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 934; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030934
Received: 6 January 2020 / Revised: 21 January 2020 / Accepted: 22 January 2020 / Published: 27 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rural Sustainable Environmental Management)
Soil and water conservation practices (SWCPs) are widely used to control soil and water loss. Quantifying the effect of SWCPs and climate change on soil and water erosion is important for regional environmental management. In this study, the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) and the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) were employed to investigate the patterns of surface runoff and soil erosion with different SWCPs in the hilly region on the Loess Plateau of China. The impact of climate change under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios was considered from 2020 to 2050. Surface runoff grew with the increased rainfall and rainfall erosivity, while soil erosion presented large variations between years due to uneven distribution of rainfall and rainfall erosivity under two scenarios. Different SWCPs significantly reduced surface soil and water loss. Compared with bare slopes, the reduction rates were 15–40% for surface runoff and 35–67% for soil erosion under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios, respectively. The combination of shrub and horizontal terracing was recommended due to its low water cost for sediment control among seven SWCPs. View Full-Text
Keywords: soil and water conservation practices; soil erosion; surface runoff; water cost for sediment control; MUSLE; SCS-CN; climate change soil and water conservation practices; soil erosion; surface runoff; water cost for sediment control; MUSLE; SCS-CN; climate change
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, M.; An, C.; Guy, C.; Lu, C. Assessment of Soil and Water Conservation Practices in the Loess Hilly Region Using a Coupled Rainfall-Runoff-Erosion Model. Sustainability 2020, 12, 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030934

AMA Style

Cai M, An C, Guy C, Lu C. Assessment of Soil and Water Conservation Practices in the Loess Hilly Region Using a Coupled Rainfall-Runoff-Erosion Model. Sustainability. 2020; 12(3):934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030934

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Mengfan, Chunjiang An, Christophe Guy, and Chen Lu. 2020. "Assessment of Soil and Water Conservation Practices in the Loess Hilly Region Using a Coupled Rainfall-Runoff-Erosion Model" Sustainability 12, no. 3: 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030934

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop