Are We Overestimating the Benefits of Emission Reduction Measures?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. A Cognitive Framework of Evaluating Environmentally Related Objects or Behavior
2.1. Cognitive Misconceptions and Biases When Making Evaluations
2.2. Cognitive Abstraction of Thought Processes When Making Evaluations
3. Discussion and Conclusions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- American Psychological Association. Society’s Grand Challenges: Insights from Psychological Science; American Psychological Association: Worcester, MA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Figueres, C.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; Whiteman, G.; Rockström, J.; Hobley, A.; Rahmstorf, S. Three years to safeguard our climate. Nat. News 2017, 546, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brookes, L.G.; Grubb, M. Energy efficiency and economic fallacies: A reply; and reply. Util. Policy 1992, 20, 390–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chitnis, M.; Sorrell, S.; Druckman, A.; Firth, S.K.; Jackson, T. Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy 2013, 55, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gillingham, K. The Consumer Response to Gasoline Price Changes: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Vivanco, D.F.; Kemp, R.; van der Voet, E. How to deal with the rebound effect? A policy-oriented approach. Energy Policy 2016, 94, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hausman, D.M.; Welch, B. Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. J. Polit. Philos. 2010, 18, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hukkinen, J.I. Addressing the practical and ethical issues of nudging in environmental policy. Environ. Values 2016, 25, 329–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- The Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, s.v. “Affordance (n.)”. Available online: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/affordance (accessed on 7 January 2020).
- Kaaronen, R.O. Affording sustainability: Adopting a theory of affordances as a guiding heuristic for environmental policy. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zachrisson, J.; Boks, C. Exploring behavioural psychology to support design for sustainable behaviour research. J. Des. Res. 2012, 10, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kollmuss, A.; Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 2002, 8, 239–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, J. Influencing policymakers. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ntanos, S.; Arabatzis, G.; Chalikias, M.S. The Role of Emotional Intelligence as an Underlying Factor Towards Social Acceptance of Green Investments. In Proceedings of the HAICTA, Chania, Greece, 21–24 September 2017; pp. 341–351. [Google Scholar]
- Ntanos, S.; Kyriakopoulos, G.; Skordoulis, M.; Chalikias, M.; Arabatzis, G. An application of the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) scale in a Greek context. Energies 2019, 12, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nilsson, A.; Hansla, A.; Heiling, J.M.; Bergstad, C.J.; Martinsson, J. Public acceptability towards environmental policy measures: Value-matching appeals. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 61, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gifford, R. The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 2011, 66, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lewandowsky, S. Future global change and cognition. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2016, 8, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sörqvist, P. Grand challenges in environmental psychology. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chernev, A.; Gal, D. Categorization effects in value judgments: Averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. J. Mark. Res. 2010, 47, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gilovich, T.; Griffin, D.; Kahneman, D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002; ISBN 0521796792. [Google Scholar]
- Joireman, J.; Truelove, H.B.; Duell, B. Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newell, B.R.; Kary, A.; Moore, C.; Gonzalez, C. Managing the Budget: Stock-Flow Reasoning and the CO2 Accumulation Problem. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2016, 8, 138–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterman, J.D.; Sweeney, L.B. Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Clim. Chang. 2007, 80, 213–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guy, S.; Kashima, Y.; Walker, I.; O’Neill, S. Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: Effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation. Clim. Chang. 2013, 121, 579–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmgren, M.; Andersson, H.; Sörqvist, P. Averaging bias in environmental impact estimates: Evidence from the negative footprint illusion. J. Environ. Psychol. 2018, 55, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaklamanou, D.; Jones, C.R.; Webb, T.L.; Walker, S.R. Using public transport can make up for flying abroad on holiday: Compensatory green beliefs and environmentally significant behavior. Environ. Behav. 2015, 47, 184–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sörqvist, P.; Langeborg, L. Hurting the world you love. New Sci. 2019, 241, 24–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sörqvist, P.; Langeborg, L. Compensating for Climate Misdeeds Can Make You a Worse Carbon Emitter; New Scientist: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Fotostock, A. The price of fast fashion. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Drew, D.; Yehounme, G. The Apparel Industry’s Environmental Impact In 6 Graphics; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Gorissen, K.; Weijters, B. The negative footprint illusion: Perceptual bias in sustainable food consumption. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 45, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmgren, M.; Kabanshi, A.; Langeborg, L.; Barthel, S.; Colding, J.; Eriksson, O.; Sörqvist, P. Deceptive sustainability: Cognitive bias in people’s judgment of the benefits of CO2 emission cuts. J. Environ. Psychol. 2019, 64, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmgren, M.; Kabanshi, A.; Marsh, J.E.; Sörqvist, P. When A+B <A: Cognitive bias in experts’ judgment of environmental impact. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 823. [Google Scholar]
- Sorrell, S.; Dimitropoulos, J. The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 636–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jessoe, K.; Rapson, D. Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use. Am. Econ. Rev. 2014, 104, 1417–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saunders, H. Is what we think of as “rebound” really just income effects in disguise? Energy Policy 2013, 57, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, B.A.; Azevedo, I.L. Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for US households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapeller, M.L.; Füllsack, M.; Jäger, G. Holiday Travel Behaviour and Correlated CO2 Emissions—Modelling Trend and Future Scenarios for Austrian Tourists. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tiefenbeck, V.; Staake, T.; Roth, K.; Sachs, O. For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy 2013, 57, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazar, N.; Zhong, C.-B. Do green products make us better people? Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, E.A.; Royhan, P.; Rahman, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Mostafa, A. The Impact of Enviropreneurial Orientation on Small Firms’ Business Performance: The Mediation of Green Marketing Mix and Eco-Labeling Strategies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moravcikova, D.; Krizanova, A.; Kliestikova, J.; Rypakova, M. Green Marketing as the Source of the Competitive Advantage of the Business. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Montalvo, C.; Peck, D.; Rietveld, E. A Longer Lifetime for Products: Benefits for Consumers and Companies; Study for Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) Committee; European Parliament: Brussels, Belgium, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Wieser, H. Beyond planned obsolescence: Product lifespans and the challenges to a circular economy. GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2016, 25, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kabanshi, A. Are We Overestimating the Benefits of Emission Reduction Measures? Sustainability 2020, 12, 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030808
Kabanshi A. Are We Overestimating the Benefits of Emission Reduction Measures? Sustainability. 2020; 12(3):808. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030808
Chicago/Turabian StyleKabanshi, Alan. 2020. "Are We Overestimating the Benefits of Emission Reduction Measures?" Sustainability 12, no. 3: 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030808