Embedding Cultivated Diversity in Society for Agro-Ecological Transition
2. General Context
2.1. From Genetic Resources to Cultivated Diversity
2.1.1. Development of the Concept of Genetic Resources in the World
2.1.2. Conserving and Using Genetic Resources in Europe
2.1.3. Context of Plant Breeding and Seeds for Organic Agriculture
2.2. Community Seed Bank and Collective Management of Diversity
2.3. Challenges of Embedding Genetic Diversity in Food Systems
3. Concepts and Outcomes from the DIVERSIFOOD Project
- Underutilized/forgotten crops: concepts and outcomes of multi-actor and on-farm evaluation, as a key step to revive cultivated diversity;
- New approaches of plant breeding for diversified and sustainable farming systems;
- Community agrobiodiversity management (CAM) as a key element of on-farm management strategies;
- Diversity and sustainability within food systems: new relationships among actors, supporting local short and fair supply chains and reconnecting farmers and consumers;
- Paradigm shift for multi-actor and transdisciplinary research, to tackle technological and regulation bottlenecks for organic and agro-ecological food systems.
3.1. Building on Underutilized Crops
3.1.1. Contextualization and Processes of (re)Introduction of Underutilized Crops
3.1.2. Overall Outcomes of Evaluation of Underutilized Crops
3.2. New Plant Breeding Strategies for Diversity and On-Farm Experimentation Concepts
3.2.1. Breeding of New Diversified Populations
3.2.2. Genetic Hypotheses Underlying Decentralized Plant Breeding Process
3.2.3. Adapting Tools for Decentralized Experimentation
- (i) improve the prediction of a target variable for selection by analyzing agronomic and nutritional traits;
- (ii) compare different varieties or populations evaluated for selection in different locations by analyzing agronomic and nutritional traits, and taste through sensory analysis;
- (iii) study the response of varieties or populations under selection over several environments by analyzing agronomic traits;
- (iv) study diversity structure and identify parents to cross based on either good complementarity or similarity for some traits by analyzing agronomic traits and molecular data;
- (v) study networks of seed circulation by analyzing network topology.
- Genetic resources (access, choice, and management);
- Techniques: (i) Breeding and management of populations (CCP, dynamic mixtures, farmer mass selections, OPV); (ii) Statistical tools—Experimental designs for on-farm trials, Statistical methods for analysis; (iii) Quality assessment (nutritional, sensory or end-use, depending on the needs of the network);
- Social aspects (multi-actor meetings, joint decision making, awareness raising, education, and training);
- Legislation (awareness raising, networking, and lobbying).
3.3. Community Agrobiodiversity Management and Community Seed Banks
3.3.1. Assessment of the Impact of Social Network and Seed Exchange on Crop Genetic Diversity
3.3.2. Describing Community Seed Banks in Europe
- Using diversity in farming systems, especially in organic and low inputs ones, is a way to reduce the production costs and a strategy for coping with market price uncertainty and climate change. Moreover, starting new projects of PPB provide organic farmers the possibilities of breeding new adapted varieties that they cannot find in the seed market;
- Creating alternative food systems based on diversity is seen as a strategy for regaining autonomy at local level with regard to large input suppliers and retailers;
- Back to diversity in local food systems is a way to meet the new demands of citizens for healthy and quality food;
- The actors involved in the initiatives see the limits and the impacts of the mainstream agricultural model. They would like to create alternative food systems, starting from seed to the plate, with an internal coherence all along the chain.
3.4. Valorization of Biodiverse Food through Systemic Integration and Coherence
- Mobilization of genetic resources: actions aimed at knowing and managing the landraces/varieties relevant for the local farming systems;
- Definition of specific product quality: actions to identify and codify the attributes of biodiverse products based on the selected varieties and methods of cultivation and processing;
- Marketing and communication: choices and tools to manage products in the market and convey values embodied in products and production systems;
- Interaction with other networks and projects: inter-connections with other projects/strategies, at local and wider scale;
- Effectiveness and sustainability of the initiative: capacity to contribute to agrobiodiversity enrichment, and to sustain existence over time.
3.4.1. Valorization of Biodiverse Food through Systemic Integration and Coherence
3.4.2. What Position on the Market and Perception and Role of Consumers
3.4.3. What Strategies for What Model of Development
4. An Enabling Environment to Embed Diversity in Food Systems
4.1. Seeds, Data, and Breeding
- Enlarging the diversity of germplasm sources, ranging from landraces to commercial varieties and breeding lines, to allow the further development of farmer varieties, variety mixtures, dynamic populations, and CCPs, using various methods;
- Expanding the diversity and sources of data, and inclusiveness of the data collection process to involve farmers and processors using various techniques ranging from scorecards to molecular diversity assessments, nutritional grain quality testing, and digital image analysis;
- Innovative social organization around the breeding process, organized in a process of decision-making meetings, information-gathering interviews and focus groups, joint field and lab visits, trainings and produce evaluation;
- Legislative and regulatory issues, to recognize the role of farmers’ collective organization in the creation and management of plant genetic resources and to improve the process of seeds registration.
4.2. Overcoming Technical and Regulatory Bottlenecks
4.3. The Need for Appropriate Policies
Conflicts of Interest
|(1) Genetic Resources||(2) Techniques||(3) Social||(4) Legislation|
|INRA and RSP||Participatory breeding of wheat populations and mixtures with on farm evaluation and selection and collective decision-making.||Landraces and lines used as such or within mixtures or crosses||Regional and satellite farms experimental design with hierarchical Bayesian model to analyse using the R package PPBStats. Comparison of selection practices of mixtures of populations.||Regular meetings to present results and take decisions. Fields visits. Training of farmers/facilitators.||Contributed to the recognition of the role of farmers’ organisations in the creation and maintenance of crops genetic resources.|
|INRA and ITAB||Looking for answers to farmers’ question “differences between CCP and dynamic populations of wheat”, in a partnership relationship between farmers and researchers||Populations cultivated at a farmer and used to create a dynamic mixture and a CCP||Involving farmers and bakers in the selection and evaluation (processing) of the populations||Informal relationship (beginning of the process)|
|LBI||Participatory breeding to improve wheat populations||Spring wheat population from Dottenfelderhof||Farmers and bakers were involved in the selection and evaluation||Informal and some meetings to discuss results and follow-up steps|
|IPC and ITQB||Multi-actor approach - connect actors in the chain. Improve yield maintaining quality for maize bread.|
Decision tools for selection of both germplasms.
|2 focus groups, 2 stakeholders meeting, # interviews|
|CSIC||Comparison of self vs open-pollination breeding approaches in yield and yield determinants||Three populations in two versions open-pollinated vs. three generations of selfing||Digital Image Analysis. Descriptors. ANOVAs and Multivariate analysis: Principal Components and Discriminant||Informal farmer meetings and collaboration in a multi-actor symposium|
|RSP and ITAB||Multi-actors’ approach–building a research community in order to improve co-evolution mechanisms between humans-tomatoes varieties and natural environments||Practitioners’ tomatoes populations||Scorecards for practitioners on farm observation, PPBstats R package.||Stakeholders meeting twice a year, focus groups phone calls, steering committee phone calls. Building of a research community.|
|RAS||Building a research community, developing evolving populations of wheat and tomato||Local varieties of wheat and public gene banks so as RAS community seed bank||Mix the most important varieties of wheat and tomato. Agronomic data were collected||Farmers prepared the trials, collected the data and collaborated in the elaboration of the protocols. In order to train them to carry on with the process RAS organised several meetings and farm visits.|
|PSR||Improve rare vegetable types by crossing old varieties with commercial varieties of known target qualities, and maintain or improve taste qualities by involving chefs and other stakeholders||Old varieties and landraces collected and conserved within the PSR network||Crossbreeding with several combinations, reciprocal harvest of seeds, start new population lines out of each harvested lot and select each population over several generations according to breeding targets.|
Brix content measurements allows positive selection within each generation. Organoleptic selection of the best lines only in hindsight.
|Stakeholder meetings to assess the resulting population lines, involvement of chefs for organoleptic evaluation.||Registration as «Niche Varieties» in Switzerland as soon as professional production is promising.|
|Arche Noah||Participatory research and breeding to improve colourful tomatoes for direct marketing (decentralised individual breeding programs)||Divers: Accessions from the ARCHE NOAH seed archive and other gene banks, commercial varieties, landraces/heirloom varieties, breeding lines||Pedigree selection and back-cross breeding programs. Primary, the site-specific aims indicate the selection techniques. However, one focus across several locations has been laid on leaf mould resistance.||Internal: Annual working group meetings, field days, workshops, product tastings.|
External: interviews with stakeholders
|ARI||Multi-actor approach. Improve chickpea, and barley yields in connection with microbial communities||Local chickpea and barley populations. Also material from ARIs breeding program||Exploitation of the principles of the Honeycomb selection designs.||Farmer meetings and policy makers|
- Wezel, A.; Bellon, S. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 29, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Yapa, L. What Are Improved Seeds? An Epistemology of the Green Revolution. Econ. Geogr. 1993, 63, 254–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tittonell, P. Ecological intensification of agriculture-sustainable by nature. Env. Sustain. 2014, 8, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gliessman, S. Transforming food systems with agroecology. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2016, 40, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duru, M.; Therond, O. Designing agroecological transitions: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 35, 1237–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Levidow., L.; Birch, K. Divergent paradigms of european agro-food innovation: The knowledge-based bio-economy (KBBE) as an R&D agenda. Sci. Technol. Hum. Value 2012, 38, 94–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demeulaneare, E.; Goldringer, I. Seeds and an agroecological transition: Farmers’ initiatives and participatory plant breeding as breakthrough innovation. Nat. Sci. Sociétés 2017, 4, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture; Bélanger, J., Pilling, D., Eds.; FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments: Rome, Italy, 2019; p. 572. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/CA3129EN/CA3129EN.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- McIntyre, B.D.; Herren, H.R.; Wakhungu, J.; Watson, R.T. Agriculture at a Crossroads: The Global Report. IAASTD (The International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development) 2009. Global Report. Synthesis Report; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; p. 590. ISBN 9781597265386. [Google Scholar]
- IPES-Food. From Uniformity to Diversity: A Paradigm Shift from Industrial Agriculture to Diversified Agroecological Systems. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food systems. 2016. Available online: www.ipes-food.org (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- FAO. Agricultural Biodiversity, Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land Conference, Background Paper 1. Maastricht, The Netherlands. 1999. Available online: http://www.fao.org/mfcal/pdf/bp_1_agb.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- The EIP-Agri is Part of EU’s Growth Strategy for This Decade. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/about/eip-agri-part-eu%E2%80%99s-growth-strategy-decade (accessed on 18 October 2019).
- Padulosi, S.; Hodgkin, T.; Williams, J.T.; Haq, N. Underutilized Crops: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities in the 21st Century. In Managing Plant Genetic Diversity, Proceedings of the Biodiversity International Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, June 2000; Engels, J.M.M., Ramanatha, R.V.., Brown, A.H.D., Jackson, M.T., Eds.; CABI Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 323–338. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. The State of the World’s Plant. Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1997; Available online: http://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/meeting/015/w7324e.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Engels, J.M.M. Plant Genetic Resources Management and Conservation Strategies: Problems and Progress. Acta Hort. ISHS 2004, 634, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonneuil, C. Seeing nature as a ‘universal store of genes’: How biological diversity became ‘genetic resources’. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 75, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bocci, R. D1.2: Report Presenting the EU Context. 2019. DYNAVERSITY. Available online: http://dynaversity.eu/project/#deliverables (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- FAO. Vingt-deuxième Conférence FAO (Résolution 8/83) 5-23 November; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Bonneuil., C.; Fenzi., M. Des ressources génétiques à la biodiversité cultivée. La carrière d’un problème public mondial. Rev. D’anthropologie Connaiss. 2011, 5, 206–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altieri, M.A.; Merrick, L.C. In situ Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources through Maintenance of Traditional Farming Systems. Econ. Bot. 1987, 41, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weise, S.; Oppermann, M. EURISCO: The European Search Catalogue for Plant Genetic Resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- ECPGR. ECPGR Concept for On-Farm. Conservation and Management of Plant. Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; European Cooperative Programme for Plant Genetic Resources: Rome, Italy, 2017; Available online: http://www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/ECPGR_Concept_for_on_farm_final__05_05_2017_bis.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Preparatory Actions. Available online: https://www.geneticresources.eu/the-study/ (accessed on 18 October 2019).
- Zoom Sur le Gwell. Available online: https://bretonnepienoir.com/des-produits-naturels-gouteux-et-sains-issus-d-elevages-en-plein-air/zoom-sur-le-gwell/ (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Lammerts van Bueren, E.T.; Struik, P.C.; Tiemens-Hulscher, M.; Jacobsen, E. Concepts of Intrinsic Value and Integrity of Plants in Organic Plant Breeding and Propagation. Crop. Sci. 2003, 43, 1922–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuijten, E.; Messmer, M.M.; Lammerts van Bueren, E.T. Concepts and Strategies of Organic Plant Breeding in Light of Novel Breeding Techniques. Sustainability 2017, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Rey, F.; Sinoir, N. Organic seeds and plant breeding: Stakeholders’ uses and expectations—French inputs on vegetables. Int. Symp. Org. Greenh. Hortic. 2013, 1041, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Bueren, E.L.; Jones, S.S. The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: A review. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2011, 58, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lammerts van Bueren, E.T.; Struik, P.C.; van Eekeren, N.; Nuijten, E. Towards resilience through systems-based plant breeding. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Goldringer, I.; Rivière, P. Methods and Tools for Decentralized on Farm Breeding. Booklet#3 2018, DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/booklet3_decentralized_on_farm_breeding_BAT_web_A4_2.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Döring, T.F.; Knapp, S.; Kovacs, G.; Murphy, K.; Wolfe, M.S. Evolutionary plant breeding in cereals-into a new era. Sustainability 2011, 3, 1944–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Vernooy, R.; Shrestha, P.; Bhuwon Sthapit, B. Community Seed Banks, origins, evolution and prospects. In Agricultural Biodiversity; Earthscan Routledge: London, UK, 2015; p. 270. Available online: https://www.bioversityinternational.org/e-library/publications/detail/community-seed-banks-origins-evolution-and-prospects/ (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Shrestha, P.; Vernooy, R.; Chaudhary, P. Community Seed Banks in Nepal: Past, Present, Future. In Proceedings of the National Workshop, LI-BIRD/USC Canada Asia/Oxfam/The Development Fund/IFAD/Bioversity International, Pokhara, Nepal, 14–15 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Dwivedi, S.L.; Lammerts van Bueren, E.T. Diversifying food systems in the pursuit of sustainable food production and healthy diets. Trends Plant. Sci. 2017, 22, 842–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Hufford, M.B.; Berny, M. Crop Biodiversity: An Unfinished Magnum Opus of Nature. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2019, 70, 727–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lammerts van Bueren, E.T.; Struik, P.C. Towards resilience through systems-based plant breeding. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 5, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Zimmerer, K.S.; de Haan, S. The biodiversity of food and agriculture (Agrobiodiversity) in the Anthropocene. Research advances and conceptual framework. Anthropocene 2019, 25, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium: Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets; United Against Hunger; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, T.; Prosperi, P. Agricultural biodiversity, social-ecological systems and sustainable diets. Nutr. Soc. 2014, 73, 498–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Pascual, U.; Muradian, R. Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in Payments for Environmental Services: A conceptual approach. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vivero-Pol, J.L.; Ferrando, T. Handbook of Food as a Commons, 1st ed.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gruère, G.P.; Giuliani, A. Marketing underutilized plant species for the benefit of the poor: A conceptual framework. In Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Economic Development; Kontoleon, A., Pasqual, U., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2009; pp. 73–87. [Google Scholar]
- Hermann, M.; Bernet, T. The transition of maca from neglect to marketprominence: Lessons for improving use strategies and market chains of minorcrops. In Agricultural Biodiversity and Livelihoods Discussion Papers 1; Bioversity International: Rome, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Kruijssen, F. Collective action for small-scale producers of agricultural biodiversity products. Food Policy 2009, 34, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Krishna, V.V.; Pascual, U. Assessing the potential of labeling schemes for insitu landrace conservation: An example from India. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2010, 15, 127–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Gautam, G. Tar analysis in syngas derived from pelletized biomass in a commercial stratified downdraft gasifier. BioResources 2011, 6, 4652–4661. [Google Scholar]
- Klerkx, L.; Van Mierlo, B. Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic; Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 457–483. [Google Scholar]
- Koelen, M.; Das, E. Social learning: A construction of reality. In Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs: Social Learning in Rural Resource Management; Leeuwis, C., Pyburn, R., Röling, N.G., Eds.; Van Gorcum Ltd.: Assen, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Brunori, G.; Rossi, A. A Comprehensive and participatory approach to the valorisation of biodiverse products. In Food Diversity between Rights, Duties and Autonomies. Legal Perspectives for a Scientific Cultural and Social Debate on the Right to Food and Agroecology; Isoni, A., Troisi, M., Eds.; LITES, Springer Cham: Basel, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Rossi, A.; Bocci, R. The Transformative Potential of Social Innovation. The case of wheat and bread value chain in Tuscany. Int. J. Sociol. Agric. Food 2018, 24, 431–448. [Google Scholar]
- Costanzo, A. Underutilised Crops. Innovation Factsheet no. 4 2017, DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Diversifood_IF4_Underutilised_Crops.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- IPGRI. Neglected and Underutilized Plant. Species: Strategic Action Plan. of the International Plant. Genetic Resources Institute; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: Rome, Italy, 2002; Available online: https://www.unscn.org/layout/modules/resources/files/Neglected_and_Underutilized_Plant_Species.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Anonymous. Cordoba Declaration on Promising Crops for the XXI Century. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Traditional and New Crops to Meet the Challenges of the XXI Century, Cordoba, Spain, 10–13 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Anonymous. Background Document. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Traditional and New Crops to Meet the Challenges of the XXI Century, Cordoba, Spain, 10–13 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kahane, R.; Hodgkin, T.; Jaenicke, H.; Hoogendoorn, C.; Hermann, M.; Keatinge, J.D.H.; d’Arros Hughes, J.; Padulosi, S.; Looney, N. Agrobiodiversity for food security, health and income. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 33, 671–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Pretty, J. Some Benefits and Drawbacks of Local Food Systems; Briefing Note for TVU, Sustain AgriFood Networ: Essex, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Esquinas-Alcázar, J. Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: Political, ethical and technical challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeven, A.C. Classification of landraces and improved cultivars of rivet wheat (Triticum turgidum) and bread wheat (T. aestivum) from Great Britain and described in 1934. Euphytica 1990, 47, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chable, V. The Rivet Wheat. Innov. Factsheet No. 5. 2018. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Diversifood_innovation_factsheet5-Rivet-Wheat.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Daurelle, N.; Maréchal, G.; Leprêtre, F.E.; Florent Mercier, F.; Chable, V. Multi-actor research for the renewal of minor cereals in the Western part of France. In Proceedings of the Organic Seed Growers Conference, Corvallis, OR, USA, 14–17 February 2018; Hubbard, K., Ed.; Organic Seed Alliance: Port Townsend, WA, USA, 2018; Volume 115, pp. 16–19. [Google Scholar]
- Hufford, M.B.; Mier y Teran, J.C.; Gepts, P. Crop Biodiversity: An Unfinished Magnum Opus of Nature. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2019, 70, 727–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leakey, R.R.B.; Weber, J.C. Tree domestication in agroforestry: Progress in the second decade. In Multifunctional Agriculture—Achieving Sustainable Development in Africa, 1st ed.; Nair, P., Garrity, D., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 9. [Google Scholar]
- Khoury, C.K.; Achicanoy, H.A. Origins of Food Crops Connect Countries Worldwide. Proc. R. Soc. B 2016. Available online: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2016.0792 (accessed on 16 January 2020). [CrossRef]
- Kell, S.; Rosenfeld, A. Benefits of Non-Traditional Crops Grown by Small Scale Growers in the Midlands; Garden Organic: Coventry, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Doring, T.; Knapp, S. Evolutionary breeding of cereals: Into a new era. Sustainability 2011, 3, 1944–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Bartha, B. Landrace Tomatoes in Hungary. Innovation Factsheet no. 15. 2018. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Diversifood_innovation_factsheet_15_tomato.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Alves, M.L.; Belo, M.; Carbas, B.; Brites, C.; Paulo, M.; Mendes Moreira, P.; Vaz Patto, M.C. Long term on-farm participatory maize breeding by stratified mass selection retains molecular diversity while improving agronomic performance. Evol. Appl. 2018, 11, 254–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Chable, V. Buckwheat. Innov. Factsheet No. 6. 2018. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Diversifood_innovation_factsheet_8.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Costanzo, A.; Serpolay, E. A Guide to Participatory Experimentation with Underutilised Genetic Resources. Bookl. #2. 2019. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Diversifood_innovation_factsheet2_VarietiesPopulations.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Kavadia, A.; Omirou, M.; Fasoula, D.; Trajanoski, S.; Andreou, E.; Ioannides, I.M. Genotype and soil water availability shape the composition of AMF communities at chickpea early growth stages. Appl. Soil Eco. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanzo, A.; Amos, D.C.; Dinelli, G.; Sferrazza, R.E.; Accorsi, G.; Negri, L.; Bosi, S. Performance and Nutritional Properties of Einkorn, Emmer and Rivet Wheat in Response to Different Rotational Position and Soil Tillage. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ceccarelli, S. Adaptation to low/high input cultivation. Euphytica 1996, 92, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desclaux, D.; Nolot, J.M. Changes in the Concept of Genotype X Environment Interactions to Fit Agriculture Diversification and Decentralized Participatory Plant Breeding: Pluridisciplinary Point of View. Euphytica 2008, 163, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanzo, A. Searchable Database on Performance Results of Underutilised Genetic Resources. Deliv. 2.5. 2019. DIVERSIFOOD Project. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DIVERSIFOOD-D2.5_Searchable-database-available-from-project-website.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Goldringer, I. Varieties and Populations. Innov. Factsheet No. 2. 2017. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Diversifood_innovation_factsheet2_VarietiesPopulations.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Rivière, P.; Goldringer, I. Response to farmer mass selection in early generation progeny of bread wheat landrace crosses. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2015, 30, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leitão, S.T.; Ferreira, E.; Bicho, M.C.; Alves, M.L.; Pintado, D.; Santos, D.; Mendes-Moreira, P.; Araújo, S.S.; Costa, J.M.; Vaz Patto, M.C. Maize Open-Pollinated Populations Physiological Improvement: Validating Tools FOR Drought Tolerance Participatory Selection. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6081. [Google Scholar]
- Gallais, A. Théorie de la Sélection en Amélioration des Plantes; Elsevier Masson: Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Ceccarelli, S.; Grando, S. Environment of selection and type of germplasm in barley. Breeding for low-yielding conditions. Euphytica 1991, 57, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceccarelli, S. Efficiency of Plant Breeding. Crop. Sci. 2015, 55, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Annicchiarico, P.; Bellah, F.; Chiari, T. Defining Subregions and Estimating Benefits for a Specific-Adaptation Strategy by Breeding Programs: A Case Study. Crop. Sci. 2005, 45, 1741–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bocci, R.; Andersen, R. Promoting an Enabling Environment for Agrobiodiversity in Europe. Bookl. #4. 2019. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/publication/booklet-4-promoting-an-enabling-environment-for-agrobiodiversity-in-europe/ (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Bocci, R.; Chable, V.; Vernooy, R. Biodiversity Management: Dialogue between representatives of Community Seed Banks and international institutions. In Proceedings of the Report from Community Seed Bank Workshop, Rome, Italy, 22 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bartha, B. Report on Local Seed Production Systems. Deliv. 4.1. 2017. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DIVERSIFOOD-D4.1-Report-on-local-seed-production-system.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Dyer, G.A.; Taylor, J.E. A crop population perspective on maize seed systems in Mexico. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Thomas, M.; Dawson, J.C. Seed exchanges, a key to analyze crop diversity dynamics in farmer-led on-farm conservation. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2011, 58, 321–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, M.; Thépot, S. Diversifying mechanisms in the on-farm evolution of crop mixtures. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 2937–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Goldringer, I.; Thomas, M. Participatory Approach to Model Community Seed System. Innovation Fact. sheet no. 20. 2019. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/IF20-Model-community-seed-systems.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Rossi, A.; Padel, S. Case Study Framework—Report for the completion of Milestone 27: Framework for socio-economic analysis of case studies. In Internal Project Report for Diversifood; Organic Research Centre: Newbury, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Padel, S.; Rossi, A. Case Studies of the Marketing of Products from Newly Bred Lines and Underutilized Crops. Embedding Crop Diversity and Networking for Local High-Quality Food Systems. Deliv. 5.1. 2018. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/DIVERSIFOOD-D5.1_Case-studies-of-the-marketing-of-products-from-newly-bred-lines-and-underutilized-crops.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Serpolay, E.; Nuijten, E. Toolkit to Foster Multi-Actor Research on Agrobiodiversity. Booklet#1. 2018. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/toolkit_multi_actor_research_BAT_web2.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Holzherr, P.; Oehen, B. Communication and Label Concept for Underutilized Crops: Checklist. In Proceedings of the Diversifood Final Congress, Rennes, France, 10–12 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Meier, C.; Oehen, B. Consumer preferences for vegetables from participatory on-farm breeding networks. In Proceedings of the Diversifood Final Congress, Rennes, France, 10–12 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Jauhiainen, L.; Keskitalo, M. The potential impact of crop species diversity on food sales in local markets. In Proceedings of the Diversifood Final Congress, Rennes, France, 10–12 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Kloppenburg, J. Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: Biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. J. Agrar. Chang. 2010, 10, 367–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Schutter, O. Report of The Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food; United Nations General Assembly: New York, NY, USA, 2014; p. 28. [Google Scholar]
- Girard, F.; Frison, C. Introduction: Commoning the seeds: The future of agrobiodiversity and food security. In The Commons, Plant Breeding and Agricultural Research. Challenges for Food Security and Agrobiodiversity; Girard, F., Frison, C., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Moore, M.-L.; Riddell, D.J.; Vocisano, D. Scaling Out, Scaling Up, Scaling Deep. Strategies of Non-profits in Advancing Systemic Social Innovation. J. Corp. Citizsh. 2015, 2015, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oehen, B.; Padel, S. Guidance Document and Considerations for the Marketing of Biodiverse Food Products. Bookl. #7. 2019. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/booklet7_guidance_doc_WEB_PAGE.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Rey, F.; Chable, V. Innovative Approaches to Embed Diversity in Food Systems: DIVERSFOOD Outcomes from Field to Plate. Bookl. #6. 2018. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/booklet6_innovative_approaches_BAT_web_v2.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Ceccarelli, S. Increasing plant breeding efficiency through evolutionary-participatory programs. In More Food: Road to Survival; Pilu, R., Gavazzi, G., Eds.; Bentham ebooks: Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2016; pp. 17–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- De Boef, W.; Subedi, A. Community Biodiversity Management; Earthscan Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Andersen, R.; Shrestha, P. Community Seed Banks: Sharing Experiences from North. and South; Diversifood: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Andersen, R.; Bartha, B.; Goldringer, I. Tools for community biodiversity management. In Proceedings of the Keynote at the Diversifood final congress “Cultivating Diversity and Food Quality”, Rennes, France, 10–11 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Halkier, B. Consumption Challenged: Food in Medialised Everyday Lives; Routledge: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Marahaini, M.N.; Jahanshiri, E. Linking data across the value chain of underutilised crops—A multidisciplinary approach. Food Res. 2018, 3, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rey, F.; Bocci, R. 10 SOLIBAM Key Innovations–Cultivating Diversity. 2014. Available online: http://www.solibam.eu/SOLIBAM/booklets_files/SOLIBAM%20key%20innovations.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Pedersen, T.; Rey, F. Breeding for Diversity—Political Implications and New Pathways for the Future. 2016. Available online: http://orgprints.org/31147/1/Cobra_net.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Nuijten, E.; Rossi, A.; Serpolay-besson, E. A holistic multi-actor approach to agrobiodiversity enhancement. In Proceedings of the Diversifood Final Congress, Rennes, France, 10–12 December 2018; pp. 87–88. [Google Scholar]
- Casañas, F.; Simó, J. Toward an Evolved Concept of Landrace. Front. Plant. Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Chable, V. A Paradigm Shift. Innov. Factsheet No. 16. 2018. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Diversifood_IF16_Paradigm_shift-1.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Kutelmach, M. Exemples of the Different Types of Populations Developed within DIVERSIFOOD. Innovation Factsheet no. 3. 2019. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IF3-Types-of-populations.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Koller, B. Community Seed Banks. Innovation Factsheet no. 1 2016, DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Diversifood_innovation_factsheet1_CSB-1.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Padel, S.; Rossi, A. Embedding Crop Genetic Diversity in Food Value Chains. Policy Recommendations from the Horizon 2020. Bookl. #5. 2019. DIVERSIFOOD. Available online: http://www.diversifood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Booklet5Diversifood_WEB.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
- Winge, T. Seed Legislation in Europe and Crop Genetic Diversity. Sustain. Agric. Rev. 2015, 15, 1–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Prip, C.; Fauchald, O.K. Securing Crop Genetic Diversity: Reconciling EU Seed Legislation and Biodiversity Treaties. RECIEL 2016, 25, 363–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Chable, V.; Nuijten, E.; Costanzo, A.; Goldringer, I.; Bocci, R.; Oehen, B.; Rey, F.; Fasoula, D.; Feher, J.; Keskitalo, M.; Koller, B.; Omirou, M.; Mendes-Moreira, P.; van Frank, G.; Naino Jika, A.K.; Thomas, M.; Rossi, A. Embedding Cultivated Diversity in Society for Agro-Ecological Transition. Sustainability 2020, 12, 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030784
Chable V, Nuijten E, Costanzo A, Goldringer I, Bocci R, Oehen B, Rey F, Fasoula D, Feher J, Keskitalo M, Koller B, Omirou M, Mendes-Moreira P, van Frank G, Naino Jika AK, Thomas M, Rossi A. Embedding Cultivated Diversity in Society for Agro-Ecological Transition. Sustainability. 2020; 12(3):784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030784Chicago/Turabian Style
Chable, Véronique, Edwin Nuijten, Ambrogio Costanzo, Isabelle Goldringer, Riccardo Bocci, Bernadette Oehen, Frédéric Rey, Dionysia Fasoula, Judit Feher, Marjo Keskitalo, Beate Koller, Michalis Omirou, Pedro Mendes-Moreira, Gaëlle van Frank, Abdel Kader Naino Jika, Mathieu Thomas, and Adanella Rossi. 2020. "Embedding Cultivated Diversity in Society for Agro-Ecological Transition" Sustainability 12, no. 3: 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030784