Next Article in Journal
A Bibliometric Model to Analyze Country Research Performance: SciVal Topic Prominence Approach in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality
Previous Article in Journal
Drivers of Farm Households’ Perceived Risk Sources and Factors Affecting Uptake of Mitigation Strategies in Punjab Pakistan: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture
Open AccessArticle

Improving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: Monitoring in a Space for Multiple Views

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy
Sustainability 2020, 12(23), 9896; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239896
Received: 23 October 2020 / Revised: 23 November 2020 / Accepted: 24 November 2020 / Published: 26 November 2020
The dynamics of current global challenges—like food and nutrition security, environmental degradation, climate change, and emergencies—reduce the availability of and/or access to natural resources, and thereby underline the urgency of achieving transformational changes in the governance of tenure. This is increasingly required to bring the greatest good to the most people, in line with human rights. The globally applicable “Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security” (VGGT) were developed to promote responsible tenure governance. The importance of instituting effective monitoring for the implementation of the VGGT at the country level in order to ensure that they have an impact on the ground is well accepted. However, little progress has been made to date. This paper explores plural perspectives on monitoring by the different stakeholders involved because of the multi-dimensional nature of the VGGT implementation, and because tenure governance is a complex system. Allowing space for multiple views means leaving no one’s view behind. It is proposed to map the multiple pathways of change to achieve responsible tenure governance in a causal framework using the concept of theories of change. A pluralistic approach will entail different theories of change operating simultaneously, which will provide an inclusive and comprehensive tool for monitoring by showing the preferred pathways of progress on the ground, and by contributing to future trajectories. View Full-Text
Keywords: tenure governance; Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (VGGT); monitoring; accountability; human rights; soft law; theory of change; pathways of change tenure governance; Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (VGGT); monitoring; accountability; human rights; soft law; theory of change; pathways of change
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jansen, L.J.M. Improving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: Monitoring in a Space for Multiple Views. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239896

AMA Style

Jansen LJM. Improving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: Monitoring in a Space for Multiple Views. Sustainability. 2020; 12(23):9896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239896

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jansen, Louisa J.M. 2020. "Improving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: Monitoring in a Space for Multiple Views" Sustainability 12, no. 23: 9896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239896

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop