Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Impacts and Recovery Strategies: The Case of the Hospitality Industry in Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
Is Price an Indicator of Garment Durability and Longevity?
Previous Article in Journal
Untact: Customer’s Acceptance Intention toward Robot Barista in Coffee Shop
Previous Article in Special Issue
Click to Buy: The Impact of Retail Credit on Over-Consumption in the Online Environment

Impacts of the BOPS Option on Sustainable Retailing

School of Management, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8600;
Received: 30 September 2020 / Revised: 14 October 2020 / Accepted: 15 October 2020 / Published: 16 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Retailing & Brand Management)
This paper focuses on the value of an omnichannel retailing option, Buy-Online-and-Pick-up-in-Store (BOPS), in reducing environmental impact. Analytical models were established to explore the impacts of the BOPS strategy on the pricing and expected profit of the dual-channel retailer as well as the environment. The equilibrium solutions under dual-channel and omnichannel scenarios were obtained. Then, we considered the impact of loyal store consumers in the extended model. We find that the retailer will increase the product price after adopting the BOPS strategy. Our analytical results also show that when the operating cost of the BOPS strategy is relatively low, the total demand under the omnichannel scenario is greater than that under the dual-channel scenario and vice versa. In addition, this strategy can always reduce the environmental impact in terms of the pure online demand. Finally, when the operating cost is lower and the fraction of consumers without channel preference is higher, the retailer can benefit from the BOPS strategy. In this case, the BOPS strategy can achieve profit improvement and environmental impact reduction. View Full-Text
Keywords: BOPS; omnichannel retailing; pricing; overpackaging BOPS; omnichannel retailing; pricing; overpackaging
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Y.; Xu, Q.; Zhao, D. Impacts of the BOPS Option on Sustainable Retailing. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8600.

AMA Style

He Y, Xu Q, Zhao D. Impacts of the BOPS Option on Sustainable Retailing. Sustainability. 2020; 12(20):8600.

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Yi, Qianqian Xu, and Da Zhao. 2020. "Impacts of the BOPS Option on Sustainable Retailing" Sustainability 12, no. 20: 8600.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop