Next Article in Journal
Quantifying the Effect of Crown Vertical Position on Individual Tree Competition: Total Overlap Index and Its Application in Sustainable Forest Management
Previous Article in Journal
Does Chinese FDI, Climate Change, and CO2 Emissions Stimulate Agricultural Productivity? An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Examining Luxury Restaurant Dining Experience towards Sustainable Reputation of the Michelin Restaurant Guide
Open AccessArticle

Factor Affecting Attitude and Purchase Intention of Luxury Fashion Product Consumption: A Case of Korean University Students

1
Department of E-Trade, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea
2
Department of Distribution Management, Tongmyong University, Busan 48520, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(18), 7497; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187497
Received: 21 July 2020 / Revised: 5 September 2020 / Accepted: 8 September 2020 / Published: 11 September 2020

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to look into the factors affecting South Korean college students’ luxury goods purchases and their intent to buy them. A conceptual model was proposed and was tested by several hypotheses. Data were collected from Seoul, Daegu, and Daejeon in South Korea. A total of 153 respondents took part in this survey, which was conducted on brand awareness, social contrast, acquisitive, innovation in fashion, engagement in fashion, buying luxury brand attitudes, and buying interest of luxury products. Factor analysis and regression analysis were done to test the hypotheses by using SPSS. The results of this study indicated a significant positive relationship between the buying intention of luxury products and brand awareness, social contrast, and innovation in fashion. This paper help manufacturer and marketing managers to make better marketing strategies for college students.
Keywords: luxury fashion goods; social comparison; shopping enjoyment; fashion lifestyle university students; brand awareness luxury fashion goods; social comparison; shopping enjoyment; fashion lifestyle university students; brand awareness

1. Introduction

South Korea has the fourth-largest GDP in Asia and the 12th largest in the world. South Korea is known for its rapid growth from one of the poorest countries in the world to a high-income country in a short period of time [1]. Due to the economic growth of South Korea, it is expected that people’s perception of luxury products will change. After almost completely opening its markets to the globe in compliance with the International Monetary Fund guidelines in 1997, Korean consumers have been rapidly becoming global consumers developing tastes similar to those in the developed Western countries. The rapid recovery of the economy from the 1997 foreign exchange crisis has boosted demands for foreign products, especially in the luxury market, which led to a drastic increase in purchasing powers. As such, they are enjoying a greater variety of products at cheaper prices since Korea’s import liberalization ratio reached 99 percent in 1997 [2], which made Koreans familiar with foreign brand names and products, especially in the area of fashion, while young consumers who are far more fashion-conscious than the older and more frugal generations are rapidly picking up the globalized consumption [3]. Buying luxury products was considered to be the sole property of the upper class, in all the age groups. According to the Korean central bank, there is a rising purchase of foreign luxury products, and it is being pointed out that, in the first month of 2002, 19.5% of household spending on goods went to imported products [4]. If we simply look into the luxury bag market, the size of South Korea’s luxury bag market was estimated at about 3.23 trillion won last year, according to market researcher Euromonitor. It is the fourth-largest in the world after the United States, China, and Japan. The market for luxury goods in Korea amounted to $12.23 billion (13.2932 trillion KRW) last year. It is the world’s eighth-largest after the United States, Japan, China, France, Italy, Britain, and Germany, and is the third-largest in Asia (Asia Economic, 2019). The trend of preferring and purchasing luxury goods is spreading like a syndrome in the wake of the wave of globalization and openness. The consumer class of luxury goods—formerly the main customers were high-income people in their 30s and 40s—is now commonly those in their 20 s, college students, and high school students [5]. People in their 20s in particular are emerging as a leading age group that expands consumption as a generation that grew up amid material affluence. In addition, from a socio-psychological point of view, they have a strong desire to own luxury goods through social contrast pursuit, control, and self-efficiency, and are leading the trend of luxury consumption and emerging as the main customers of luxury stores despite lower income levels than older people [6]. College students now maintain a fairly high level of consumption compared to college students in the past. They are buying luxury goods not only through existing department stores and duty-free shops but also through various routes such as online shopping malls and overseas direct pitches. As the purchase and interest of luxury goods by college students grows, there is a need for research to be conducted on a group of college students who are increasingly becoming the main consumers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the factors affecting university students’ attitudes toward the purchase of luxury products and to investigate the impact of consumers’ attitudes and buying intention on luxury products.

2. Literature Review

There has been an immense interest among researchers to study the luxury markets due to its growth in the recent past. The size of the luxury market reached more than 1 trillion USD in 2014, and it consists of a number of diverse categories [7]. This market has also experienced enormous growth, with the total number of consumers in the past twenty years tripling, and is predicted to reach 400 luxury consumers worldwide by 2020 [8]. One of the main factors for this global phenomenon has been attributed to the increase in luxury consumption in many Asian markets. Moreover, fierce demand in the emerging markets of India, China, and the Middle East has fueled much of the growth of the overall luxury market in recent years [9].
There is not a widely accepted definition of what constitutes a luxury brand. For example, there is no term in the American Marketing Association’s dictionary that defines “luxury,” “luxury brand,” or “luxury marketing.” However, scholars from different disciplines have attempted to define what constitutes a luxury brand but without a clear consensus. Although some semiotics scholars have argued that there are certain “codes of luxury” that are consistent across disciplines and ages [10], and there are a number of challenges in composing a definition of luxury brands, including the fact that luxury is a relative concept [11], and that perceptions of what constitutes “luxury” have changed over time [12]. These and other challenges have led [13] to state that prior research is characterized by “…a lack of clarity regarding a definition, operationalization, and measurement of brand luxury.” This observation is consistent with previous calls by researchers for a more precise definition of luxury goods marketing [14]. It has further been claimed that the definition and measurement of luxury have been highly subjective even though luxury is not an inherently subjective construct [15]. Thus, it remains possible and desirable to define what a luxury brand is and measure the degree to which a given brand is a luxury brand.
Luxury fashion products are often expressed as superior goods, sophisticated, and elegant in style [16]. Several authors defined luxury products as goods that are of high quality, expensive, and scarce in nature that represent the status of the buyer, and the product may not necessarily be for day-to-day use [17]. In Korean society, the word “luxury” is used to denote a trademark or expensive product rather than a special product and also to represent higher-end foreign brands [18]. The word “luxury” became a representative word of wealth, upper class, and high-end products which is why marketers are intentionally using the term “luxury” with their goods for their marketing activities to fulfill Korean consumers’ desires. Luxury goods refer to goods generally recognized by society as luxurious and classy goods, both in their exchange value and in their symbolic value. Such luxury goods were previously recognized as being purchased only by the upper class, but now the non-upper class is also actively buying them. The reason why luxury goods are popular is firstly the reproduction of one’s possessive desire for high symbolic value goods, and the phenomenon in which the non-upper class is jumping into the buying of luxury goods can also be seen as the desire of “matching”—the act of consuming like others. The desire to show off is the target reason for luxury purchasing, and, in addition, it is possible to buy on the way of falling for the beauty of the luxury brand itself [18]. There is a desire to match the value of one’s own value with that of luxury goods—the sense of accomplishment when you put in what you thought would be out of reach. There have been many changes in the shopping behavior of Korean consumers over the past decade. Among them, changes related to the consumption of luxury goods have been very noticeable, and the survey, which was published in 2007 by Anders Consulting, suggests a lot. According to the above-mentioned paper, the perception of value and desire for consumption of luxury goods have become very high among all age groups compared to the past. This could be interpreted by Koreans as luxury goods being no longer expensive products that feel distant but have become part of their lives.

2.1. Luxury Fashion Goods in Korean University Students

There has been a rapid increase in the luxury goods market throughout the world. In South Korea, luxury goods consumption continued to grow in 2015 [19]. Among the consumers of these luxury goods, the major consumers were women, which accounted for 60% of the global luxury market, while men accounted for 40% [20]. Although the major consumers of luxury goods have traditionally been 40- to 60-year-old wealthy women, the demand for luxury goods of younger consumers aged 20–30 years old has sharply increased [21].
Moreover, Park [22] opined that “Korea’s luxury goods market has grown more than 10 percent every year since it was imported in earnest with the opening of the retail market in 1996, and it is a major country with 7th to 8th place in the global luxury market.” The growth and change of the luxury brand market are accelerating with more opportunities and knowledge of brands than in the past. In other words, consumers’ perception of luxury goods in the Korean market can be divided into 1st luxury brand, 2nd class, Young luxury brand, and Masstige luxury brand, and the market segment is expected to accelerate in the future as the market is rapidly growing, and more and more young people and college students are spending on luxury brand names. Young college students watch K-Pop and Korean drama, while popular songs and movies are of relatively high interest, hence the Korean wave influences college students’ purchasing behavior toward fashion luxury brands [23]. Thus it is important to look into their purchase behavior and what influences them to invest money in luxury products.

2.2. Hypothesis Development

2.2.1. Brand Awareness

Brand awareness has been defined as consumers’ psychological orientation to choose highly advertised, well-known brand-name products [24,25]. It is the sensitivity to brand names that are psychologically important to consumers before purchasing a product, and as a consumer, an individual wants to value the brand and purchase a famous brand [26]. The brand represents a social level, including the buyer’s status and authority. People tend to judge a person by their clothes, accessories, etc. People buy luxury items from famous brands to raise their status. These people prioritize the product’s external properties over the properties of the product’s durability, practicality, etc. This shows that the more socially motivated consumers are, the more sensitive they are to the brand, and the lower price resistance they have to purchase brand products [27]. Consumers with a high sense of brand are the first to identify a brand when purchasing a product, and the brand has an important influence on their decision making [27]. If these purchases continue, it will increase consumers’ preference for a particular brand and consumers’ loyalty to luxury goods. Therefore, from the above discussion, the following hypothesis was developed:
Hypothesis 1 (H1). 
Brand awareness is positively related to Korean college students’ attitudes toward buying luxury goods.

2.2.2. Acquisitive

As individuals traverse from childhood to adolescence, there is an evolution of self-definition from acquiring possessions to engaging in activities related to identity [28]. Consumer’s ideal identity and lifestyle are expressed by material goods, which helps some consumers fulfill their sense of self. According to previous research, it has been examined how individuals who are materialistic believe the acquisition of objects will help them establish a sense of security and improve their well-being.
Acquisitive is defined as the importance to which a consumer attaches to attaining worldly possessions [28,29]. It is a term referring to the trend of placing importance on economic and material values, thus losing the inherent value of human beings to possess and belittling them, and it is a general phenomenon resulting from the improvement of material conditions in a society where there was a lack of material conditions in life. Possessions become a main focus when materialism (acquisitive) is highly important in one’s value system. According to Richins and Dawson [30], materialism has been divided into three aspects, such as: (1) the central focus in his or her life is the acquisition of material possessions, (2) his or her main source of life satisfaction is the pursuit of material possessions, and (3) possessions are viewed as a marker for success.
Acquisitive encourages consumers to be conscious of their status and spend a superfluous amount of their resources on acquiring goods [31,32]. It is very important to understand consumers’ materialistic tendencies or behaviors because they, directly and indirectly, affect the causes and consequences of their daily consumption behaviors [33]. It is found that those with a high materialistic incline to show their own success or strengthening their social status and appearance [34]. Furthermore, Ji-Won and Soon-Hee [35] studied the effects of acquisitive on imported luxury goods preferences among college students and found that the higher the acquisitive tendency, the more significant the preference for imported luxury goods is among college students. Thus, the following hypothesis was developed:
Hypothesis 2 (H2). 
Acquisitive is positively related to Korean college students’ attitudes toward buying luxury goods.

2.2.3. Social Contrast

Social contrast theory proposes that individuals who want to evaluate themselves compare with others [36] and thus usually evaluate their opinions and abilities by comparing them with the opinions and abilities of other people when objective criteria are not available, and when a discrepancy exists in regard to opinions, people tend to change their own positions to be closer to others in a social group [36]. According to Moschis and Churchill [37], individuals are considered to be more devoted if they regularly interact with peers, and Achenreiner [38] posits that individuals are more easily influenced by others.
It has been indicated that social contrast with friends and social contrast with media figures, normative peer influence, peer communication, and motivation to view advertisements all have positive effects on the attachment to worldly possessions [39]. According to previous research, consumers’ emphasis on need or status symbols differs. U.S. consumers give emphasis to their own needs whereas Chinese consumers emphasize status symbols since they put more value on the need to be associated with the group rather than their own needs [40]. Research findings from Kang and Park-Poaps [41] indicated the antecedents and outcomes of social shopping, including social contrast and shopping satisfaction, respectively. Therefore, based on this assumption, the following hypothesis was developed:
Hypothesis 3 (H3). 
Social contrasts have a positive effect on the way people buy luxury fashion products.

2.2.4. Fashion Innovativeness

Fashion innovativeness is defined as an individual’s disposition to purchase new and different items rather than stick with previous choices and consumption patterns [42]. According to Goldsmith, et al. [43], consumers who are the first to adopt new apparel products are considered as fashion innovators. Fashion innovators are among the first buyers of the latest styles and product lines, and reactions toward new styles and product lines may also influence later adopters. Researchers in various fields have conducted studies on the characteristics of innovators to describe and explain how and why this behavior arises and how certain psychological characteristics are associated with it. Furthermore, there has been little or no research on the relationship between fashion innovativeness and luxury fashion consumption. Innovativeness is considered crucial in the areas of marketing and consumer research due to the importance of innovators to new product success [44]. According to the research by Ji-Young and Eun-Ju [45], it was found that there were differences in purchase intention affected by design characteristics in bags, shoes, and accessories category. In addition, based on the research findings, it was suggested to focus on innovative design characteristics for luxury brands and to identify specifically the different needs of consumers through fashion-related behavioral factors. Thus, the following hypothesis was drawn:
Hypothesis 4 (H4). 
Fashion innovation is positively related to attitudes toward buying luxury goods.

2.2.5. Engagement in Fashion

Engagement in fashion can be defined based on the aggregate effect of a variety of important fashion behavioral activities. It is the level of perception or interest in a particular subject in a given situation or the level of personal importance or interest associated with one’s own important value in a particular situation in the purchase of a fashion product. Engagement in fashion is presented in fashion research as an important variable that has a lot of impact on consumer behavior. The idea of fashion involvement plays a crucial role in explaining consumer behavior, such as the formation of attitudes [46]. Fashion involvement is a key concept in market segmentation, as highly relevant consumers are generally considered to be concentrated buyers of fashion products [47]. Consumers who are highly involved in fashion have emerged as very influential leaders in the overall fashion adoption process [48,49,50]. Based on this information, the following hypotheses were developed:
Hypothesis 5 (H5). 
Engagement in fashion has a strong influence on the purchase of fashion products.

2.3. Attitude Toward Buying Luxury Product

Attitude toward buying a luxury product is defined as a subjective possibility that includes the relationship between the person and the purchase behavior and as a variable between the person’s attitude to the act of purchase [51]. Attitudes toward the performance of actions are widely accepted as the determinant of intent to perform actions. The reasonable behavioral theory developed by Fishbein and Ajzen [52] suggests that attitudes to behavior are related to behavioral intent. According to Zhang and Kim [53], the purchase intention of luxury products depends on several factors, like psychological preference toward brand name and brand consciousness. Extensive research has supported positive predictions of attitudes toward purchasing intentions [54,55]. Research done by Zhang, et al. [56] mentioned that experience of purchasing luxury products earlier will have a direct impact on consumer purchase intention. In the context of luxury consumption, previous research found a positive relationship between consumers’ attitudes toward luxury brands and their willingness to buy luxury brands. Thus, the following hypothesis was developed:
Hypothesis 6 (H6). 
The attitude toward buying luxury goods is related to the intention of purchasing luxury goods.

3. Research Method

3.1. Data Collection and Its Process

The data were collected from college students who were studying at different universities in South Korea. Both online and paper-based questionnaires were used to collect data to test our proposed model given in Figure 1. For online data collection, Google Form (https://www.google.com/forms/about/) was used to disseminate the survey. Google Forms is a widely used survey administration app which is a part of the Google Drive office suite, along with Google Docs, Google Sheets, and Google Slides. Its features are the same as in other Google Drive apps such as collaboration and sharing features which are found in Docs, Sheets, and Slides. The questionnaire of the study was divided into three sections. The initial part of this survey was about consent, followed by the item questions to measure each variable, such as brand awareness, acquisitive social contrast, innovation in fashion, engagement in fashion, attitude toward buying luxury products, and buying intention of luxury products. The final section of this questionnaire included demographic information such as fashion goods, buying experience of luxury goods, gender, age, and acquisitive status.
The item questions of the survey were originally written in English; however, it has been translated into the Korean language for a better understanding of the local students. A bilingual Korean professor was asked to check the accuracy of the translation. Based on his opinion, the questionnaire was modified slightly to ensure clarity and understanding. As the data were mostly collected through an online portal, consent was taken from the participant while filling out the form.

3.2. Instruments

Most of the question items were taken from previous papers and were slightly modified as per the research requirement. Detailed information about the instrument is given billow in Table 1.
A total of 56 question items were adopted from earlier research papers to fulfill our research measurement. These items were marked by a recursive scale at an even point, and the range varied as well, except for items on the attitude of purchasing goods; seven-point recursions were used, while those on the attitude of buying luxury goods used a five-point Likert scale.

4. Results

4.1. Sample

A total of 200 questionnaires were distributed online as well as paper-based, however only 176 respondents filled up and returned our questionnaire. Twenty-three samples were eliminated due to missing and inappropriate answers. Therefore, a total of 153 respondents were selected for this research, with about 53% (n = 82) of the respondents being women, and about 47% (n = 71) being men. Those aged 23 or older accounted for 41.2% of the respondents, followed by those aged 22, 21, and 20. None of the participants were under the age of 20. The respondents’ monthly allowance ranged from less than 300,000 won to more than 600,000 won, with about 34.7% receiving between 300,000 and 399,999 won (1 euro = 1400 won). About 55.6% of respondents did not buy luxury goods in the past six months, while 75.2% of respondents spent between 150,000 won and 499.999 won per item. Table 2 provides a detailed description of the respondent profile.

4.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

To check the validity of the research model, Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software. CFA is a factorial analysis method for verifying the validity of a design, hypothesis, or postulated factorial structure. Model fit is normally evaluated with five different fitness indexes: chi-square statistics, non-standard fitment index (NNFI), comparison fit index (CFI), incremental fitment index (IFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and we analyzed the CFA factors using SPSS. Based on the data values obtained using forms, the validity and reliability of the data values were reviewed by using SPSS to identify factor loading, Cronbach’s alpha value (Cronbach’s α), and mean and standard deviation values. Table 3 illustrates factor loading and t-value as well as Average Variance Extracted(AVE). The reliability measurement coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha value, was then used to determine if it was suitable for the use of the analysis. Table 4 provides the means, standard deviations, and correlations within the independent variables.

4.3. Testing Hypotheses

According to Lei and Wu [57], the model estimate does not work well with SEM when the sample size is small. Thus, regression analysis was performed to test hypotheses over SEM. Item questions of each dimension were added and averaged using SPSS to represent that dimension. A higher value denotes a higher degree of each variable. A 0.05 level was set to check statistical significance. To test hypotheses starting from 1 to 5, brand awareness, acquisitive, social contrast, innovation in fashion, and engagement in fashion were used as independent variables whereas attitude toward buying luxury fashion products was used as an independent variable. The regression table (Table 5) shows the independent variable explain 27% of the variance in attitude toward buying luxury fashion product.
Regression results in Table 5 revealed that brand awareness β = 0.36, p < 0.01, social contrast β = 0.14, p < 0.03, and innovation in fashion β = 0.39, and p < 0.001 is significantly related to attitude toward buying luxury products. Thus, hypotheses 1, 3, and 4 were supported.

4.4. Testing Hypotheses

Structure equation modeling (SEM) was intended to be used to test conceptual models and research hypotheses, however, due to the sensitivity of the sample size, SEM was considered to be not suitable for this research. According to Lei and Wu [57], the model estimate does not work well with SEM when the sample size is small. Thus, regression analysis was performed to test hypotheses over SEM. Item questions of each dimension were added and averaged using SPSS to represent that dimension. A higher value denotes a higher degree of each variable. A 0.05 level was set to check statistical significance. To test hypotheses starting from 1 to 5, brand awareness, acquisitive, social contrast, innovation in fashion, and engagement in fashion were used as independent variables whereas attitude toward buying luxury fashion products was used as an independent variable. The regression table (Table 5) shows the independent variable explain 27% of the variance in attitude toward buying luxury fashion product. Regression results in Table 5 revealed that brand awareness, β = 0.36, p < 0.01, social contrast, β = 0.14, p < 0.03, and innovation in fashion, β = 0.39, p < 0.001, are significantly related to attitude toward buying luxury products. Thus, hypotheses 1, 3, and 4 were supported.
Therefore, to test the hypotheses, a measure item of each dimension was added and averaged using the SPSS to represent that dimension. Brand awareness, acquisitive, social contrast, innovation in fashion, and engagement in fashion were used as independent variables and as dependent variables in purchasing luxury goods to test hypotheses 1 to 5 by obtaining average and standard deviation for each survey item. Table 4 shows these results and the average level of the answer when it is set as the reference point from 1 to 7, which was not deemed to have much to do with attitudes and perceptions of buying luxury goods.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

One of the main objectives of this study was to identify the influencing factors that affect young Korean college students’ attitudes toward purchasing luxury fashion products. Going through the data and the trend, it was interesting to learn and discover the new emerging luxury market in Korea, after China, Asia’s largest luxury market. In the past, people in their 30s and 40s, whose income was relatively high, used to be the main consumers, but recently, people in their 20s showed increased interest in fashion or luxury goods, self-efficiency, and social comparative pursuit. The results of this research showed that brand awareness is one of the important variables in assessing Korean college students’ attitudes toward buying luxury products. The findings showed the frequency of shopping for general fashion goods was higher than “normal.” This may be associated with the social status and reputation an individual perceived when buying luxury products. In Korean society, people have luxury products to assert their wealth and choose to buy luxury products to denote their prestige and status.
On the other hand, social contrast and attitude toward buying luxury products showed a significant relationship. Korean students pay attention to their peers dressing and the items they possess. They also follow K-Pop, look into their dressing sense, and always copy their latest fashion. As Korean college students broadly imitate K-Pop singers trends and the brands they follow, marketers used to sponsor popular K-Pop singers to promote their product and increase brand value. Besides friends, students also tend to follow those whom they admire. Apart from brand awareness and social contrast, innovation in fashion was also found to be important for Koran college students. As they are college students and academically sound, they are conscious of brand value. Therefore, retail companies should pay more attention to come up with new innovative product frequently to keep the customer who loves innovative fashion products. Earlier research stated that consumer purchase behavior is influenced by peers [58], and the current study validates that Korean students are also influenced by their peers. The result of this study could help fashion brand manufacturers to strategize their marketing methods to capture more young customers and may use young influencers (K-Pop singers) to promote their products which can help to grab more young customers.
In our research, acquisitive showed a marginal significance with the attitude toward buying luxury products. An earlier research paper by Juan Li and Su [59] explained that acquisitiveness itself cannot be a significant factor when it comes to a collective society. People in a collective society tend to have a high level of acquisitive than in western culture. Thus, the firm targeting the Korean luxury market segment should clearly understand Korean culture and society. The Korean students who quickly convert to the luxury products consumption group are aged between 20 and 30 years. Thus, the finding of this research postulated the important factors that affect the luxury product consumption, and the targeted age group could be college students for a profitable business. The result of this study could also be valuable for strategy building for the marketer who is producing luxury products for the young age group. This research also suggested that a marketing manager or marketing strategy builder should emphasize presenting luxury products as symbols of wealth and beauty to young Korean customers, which will boost social pressure. Apart from this, the marketing manager should also need to concentrate on the proliferation of the brand symbol. This research could give us a sense that popular Korean K-Pop singers could influence prospective buyers as they are popular around the world and very trendy as well as fashionable, young, and beautiful. Thus future studies could be done to explore the moderating role of K-Pop/Korean drama in brand selection or the purchase intention of branded products by the young generation. Besides this, the present paper included a few variables; there could be other variables which might extend and give comprehensive results of the factors of purchase intention. Korea is a homogenous society and carries a similar and strong national culture. Thus, buying foreign luxury brands may be influenced by local sentiments. Further study can look into the local sentiments of purchasing luxury foreign brands. Therefore, a qualitative or mixed-methods approach could be proposed to better understand the attitudes of young people toward luxury brands.
Like many other papers, this paper also has several limitations. The sample for this research was only taken from a few universities, thus it would be difficult to generalize the result of this study. Collecting samples from several universities from several geographical regions could have given a more comprehensive understanding of the research. Besides this, the sample size is comparatively low. Increasing sample size may increase the generalizability of the finding. Future research can be done by adding a larger sample size from nationwide. Finally, there was a high number of questions in our questionnaire, which could lead to survey fatigue. A more concise questionnaire could increase the number of respondents as well as the quality of the research results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I.; methodology, M.I.; software B.N.S.; validation, M.I., and B.N.S.; formal analysis, M.I.; investigation, M.I.; resources, B.N.S.; data curation, M.I., B.N.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.I.; writing—review and editing, B.N.S.; visualization, B.N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kleiner, J.R. Korea, a Century of Change; World Scientific: Singapore, 2001; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Junkyu, L. Korea’s Trade Structure and Its Policy Challenges; The Future of Korean Trade Policy; Korea Economic Institute of America: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; Volume 28. [Google Scholar]
  3. The Great Changes in Korean Lifestyle. Available online: https://www.lgad.co.kr/webzine/030102/study/study3.htm (accessed on 3 February 2020).
  4. Kirk, D. Central Bank Chides Koreans for Their Spendthrift Ways. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/04/business/central-bank-chides-koreans-for-their-spendthrift-ways.html (accessed on 4 August 2020).
  5. Kweon, Y.H.K.S.A.; Kim, E.J.; Han, A.R. Recognition and Purchasing Attitude toward Fashion Luxury Brand by University Students in Cheongju. 충북대학교 생활과학연구소 2007, 10, 275–288. [Google Scholar]
  6. Koh, I.K. An Exploratory Study on Korean 20’s Consuming Behaviors in Luxuries and Imitations. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Ventur. Entrep. 2014, 10, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  7. Altagamma 2014 Worldwide Markets Monitor. Available online: http://www.luxesf.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Altagama-Monitor1.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2020).
  8. Lens on the Worldwide Luxury Consumer. Available online: https://recursos.anuncios.com/files/598/20.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2020).
  9. Kim, A.J.; Ko, E. Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1480–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Larraufie, A.-F.M.; Kourdoughli, A. The e-semiotics of luxury. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2014, 5, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mortelmans, D. Sign values in processes of distinction: The concept of luxury. Semiotica 2005, 2005, 497–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cristini, H.; Kauppinen-Räisänen, H.; Barthod-Prothade, M.; Woodside, A. Toward a general theory of luxury: Advancing from workbench definitions and theoretical transformations. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Miller, K.W.; Mills, M.K. Contributing clarity by examining brand luxury in the fashion market. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1471–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Berthon, P.; Pitt, L.; Parent, M.; Berthon, J.-P. Aesthetics and ephemerality: Observing and preserving the luxury brand. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2009, 52, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Godey, B.; Pederzoli, D.; Aiello, G.; Donvito, R.; Chan, P.; Oh, H.; Singh, R.; Skorobogatykh, I.I.; Tsuchiya, J.; Weitz, B. Brand and country-of-origin effect on consumers’ decision to purchase luxury products. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1461–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Michel, C.; Gerald, M. Luxury Brand Management; Original work published 2008; Son, J.Y., Translator; Miraebook Publishing: Seoul, Korea, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, L.; Cude, B.J. Chinese consumers’ purchase intentions for luxury clothing: A comparison between luxury consumers and non-luxury consumers. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2018, 30, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, Y. Social Foundation of Luxury Good Obsession in South Korea; Brandeis University: Waltham, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. International, E. Luxury Goods in South Korea. Available online: http://www.euromonitor.com/luxury-goods-in-south-korea/report (accessed on 4 August 2020).
  20. Company, B. 2013 Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study. Available online: http://recursos.anuncios.com/files/581/60.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2020).
  21. Choi, E.-J.; Hong, K.-H.; Lee, Y.-J. Korean consumers’ perceptions toward luxury products. J. Fash. Bus. 2010, 14, 195–215. [Google Scholar]
  22. Park, J.A. Transactions: A Study on Korean and Japanese Consumers’ Attitudes and Consumer Knowledge about Luxury Brands. J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text. 2010, 34, 1303–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hong, K.-H.; Liu, J. Korean fashion brand purchasing behavior by fashion leadership and Korean wave of college women students in China. J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text. 2009, 33, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shim, S.; Gehrt, K.C. Hispanic and Native American adolescents: An exploratory study of their approach to shopping. J. Retail. 1996, 72, 307–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sprotles, G.B.; Kendall, E.L. A methodology for profiling consumers’ decision-making styles. J. Consum. Aff. 1986, 20, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. SungHawe, H.; Hyun, H.D. Structural Relationships among Brand Consciousness, Happiness, Brand Identification and Brand Loyalty: Focused on In-bound Chinese Tourists. Korea Assoc. Bus. Educ. 2017, 32, 375–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Park, J.; Lee, K. Male emerging adults’ self-perceived superiority and clothing values: The influences on brand conciousness and brand loyalty behavior. J. Brand Des. Assoc. Korea 2013, 26, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Belk, R.W. Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. J. Consum. Res. 1985, 12, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Richins, M.L. When wanting is better than having: Materialism, transformation expectations, and product-evoked emotions in the purchase process. J. Consum. Res. 2012, 40, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Richins, M.L.; Dawson, S. A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. J. Consum. Res. 1992, 19, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Goldsmith, R.E.; Clark, R.A. Materialism, status consumption, and consumer independence. J. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 152, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silvera, D.H.; Lavack, A.M.; Kropp, F. Impulse buying: The role of affect, social influence, and subjective wellbeing. J. Consum. Mark. 2008, 25, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, J.H. The Impact of Materialism on Impulse Buying and Happiness after Shopping. Korea Logist. Res. Assoc. 2017, 27, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Richins, M.L. Special possessions and the expression of material values. J. Consum. Res. 1994, 21, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ji-Won, J.; Soon-Hee, J.; Wook, C.K. Materialism, Conspicuous Consumption, and Preference for Imported Luxury Brands Among College Students. J. Korean Home Manag. Assoc. 2003, 21, 181–192. [Google Scholar]
  36. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 1954, 7, 117–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moschis, G.P.; Churchill, G.A. Consumer Socialization: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. J. Mark. Res. 1978, 15, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Achenreiner, G.B. Materialistic Values and Susceptibility to Influence in Children. Adv. Consum. Res. 1997, 24, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chan, K.; Prendergast, G. Materialism and social comparison among adolescents. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 2007, 35, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adams, R. The utility of prestige: Chinese and American hedonic ratings of prestige goods. J. Glob. Mark. 2011, 24, 287–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kang, J.; Park-Poaps, H. Motivational Antecedents of Social Shopping for Fashion and its Contribution to Shopping Satisfaction. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2011, 29, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Im, S.; Bayus, B.L.; Mason, C.H. An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2003, 31, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Goldsmith, R.E.; Freiden, J.B.; Kilsheimer, J.C. Social values and female fashion leadership: A cross-cultural study. Psychol. Mark. 1993, 10, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Foxall, G.R.; Bhate, S. Cognitive styles and personal involvement of market initiators for ‘healthy’food brands: Implications for adoption theory. J. Econ. Psychol. 1993, 14, 33–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ji-Young, K.A.; Eun-Ju, K. The Impact of Design Characteristics on Brand Attitude and Purchase Intention-Focus on Luxury Fashion Brands. J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text. 2010, 34, 252–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Summers, T.A.; Belleau, B.D.; Xu, Y. Predicting purchase intention of a controversial luxury apparel product. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2006, 10, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hong, K.-H.; Rucker, M. The role of product type and consumer fashion involvement in clothing satisfaction. J. Consum. Satisf. Dissatisfaction Complain. Behav. 1995, 8, 198–207. [Google Scholar]
  48. Goldsmith, R.E.; Hofacker, C.F. Measuring consumer innovativeness. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1991, 19, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tigert, D.J.; Ring, L.J.; King, C.W. Fashion involvement and buying behavior: A methodological study. ACR N. Am. Adv. 1976, 3, 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  50. Naderi, I. Beyond the fad: A critical review of consumer fashion involvement. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2013, 37, 84–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. J. Bus.Ventur. 1997, 5, 177–189. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior; Prentice-hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1980; Volume 278. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, B.; Kim, J.-H. Luxury fashion consumption in China: Factors affecting attitude and purchase intent. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2013, 20, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bellman, L.M.; Teich, I.; Clark, S.D. Fashion accessory buying intentions among female millennials. Rev. Bus. 2009, 30, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yoh, E.; Damhorst, M.L.; Sapp, S.; Laczniak, R. Consumer adoption of the Internet: The case of apparel shopping. Psychol. Mark. 2003, 20, 1095–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, L.; Cude, B.J.; Zhao, H. Determinants of Chinese consumers’ purchase intentions for luxury goods. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2020, 62, 369–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lei, P.W.; Wu, Q. Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educ. Meas. Issues Pract. 2007, 26, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ünal, S.; Deniz, E.; Akın, N. Determining the Factors That Influence the Intention to Purchase Luxury Fashion Brands of Young Consumers. Ege Akad. Bakış Derg. 2019, 19, 221–236. [Google Scholar]
  59. Li, J.J.; Su, C. How Face Influences Consumption-A Comparative Study of American and Chinese Consumers. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2007, 49, 237–256. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Proposed model.
Figure 1. Proposed model.
Sustainability 12 07497 g001
Table 1. Authors and scale development.
Table 1. Authors and scale development.
VariablesAuthorsNo. of Items
(1 = Strongly Disagree to
7 = Strongly Agree)
Likert Scales
Brand awarenessSproles and Kendall (1986)77
Brand awarenessTai and Tam (1997)37
AcquisitiveWong et al. (2003), Richins and Dawson’s (1992), and Richins (2004)157
Innovation in fashionGoldsmith and Hofacker (1991)67
Social ContrastChan and Prendergast’s (2007)47
Engagement in FashionChae et al. (2006)157
Buying IntentionSummers et al. (2006)27
Attitude towards buying luxury productPark et al. (2007) and Zhang B. et al. (2013)47
Table 2. Profiles and the respondents.
Table 2. Profiles and the respondents.
MeasureItemsPercentage
GenderMale47
Female53
Age2017.6
2122.9
2218.3
23 or older41.2
EducationUniversity students100
Monthly income in wonUnder 300,000 26.1
300,000–399,99934.7
400,000–499,99924.8
500,000–599,9995.2
600,000 and over10.5
Amount of luxury fashion goods purchased within the last 6 monthsNo items55.6
1–3 items30.7
4–6 items or more13.7
Money spent on one luxury fashion item150,000–499,999 won75.2
500,000–799,999 won16.3
800,000–999,999 won5.2
1,000,000–1499,999 won1.3
1,500,000–4999,999 won2.0
Table 3. Confirmatory factor loading and t-value.
Table 3. Confirmatory factor loading and t-value.
Factors and ItemsFactor Loading t-Value
Brand awareness (α = 0.84; AVE = 0.72; CR = 0.89)
4.High-end specialty stores and department stores offer me the best products 0.770-
3.The higher the price of a product, the better its quality0.8749.82
5.I prefer to buy the best-selling brand products0.8437.04
6.The most advertised brand product is usually a good choice0.7565.59
8.I am willing to pay a high price for a famous brand0.6998.10
10.I prefer buying foreign brands to domestic brands0.8156.03
Acquisitive (α = 0.81; AVE = 0.61; CR = 0.88)
1.How do you feel about people who own expensive homes, car and clothes? (Do not admire-greatly admire)0.681-
4.How do you feel about acquiring material possessions as an achievement in life? (Not important-vary important)0.8216.64
6.Would your life be any better if you owned certain things that you do not have now? (Not any better-much better)0.7664.38
8.How would you feel if you could afford to buy more things? (Not any happier—much happier)0.8838.07
9.How would you feel if you owned something better?0.7683.99
15.What do you think about living a lot of luxurious life?0.6885.02
Social Contrast (α = 0.79; AVE = 0.71; CR = 0.81)
1.I am interested in which brand my favorite entertainer is using. 0.790-
2.I pay importance to my rich friends’ and watch what they buy.0.8296.49
3.I give importance to what brands my favorite movie stars and pop singers are using.0.9107.05
Innovation in fashion (α = 0.83; AVE = 0.69; CR = 0.84)
1.Normally, I am the last in my circle of friends to know the names of the latest new fashions0.743-
2.In general, I am among the last in my circle of friends to buy a new fashion item when it appears.0.8418.60
3.Compared to my friends, I own few new fashion items.0.7967.06
Engagement in fashion (α = 0.85; AVE = 0.77; CR = 0.91)
1.Fashion goods matter to me.0.877-
3.My friends turn to me for advice on fashion goods.0.70711.03
4.I usually have one or more of the very latest style fashion goods.0.8128.89
5.I like to shop for fashion goods.0.71910.18
6.I usually dress for fashion not comfort.0.8986.62
7.I think I am sensitive to fashion.0.8227.66
13.I spend a lot of time trying to find the fashion products I want.0.7269.35
Table 4. Means, standard deviations, and correlations.
Table 4. Means, standard deviations, and correlations.
MeanStd. Dev.12345
1Brand awareness4.131.181
2Acquisitive3.991.200.411
3Social contrast2.871.320.230.171
4Innovation in fashion4.361.260.250.260.171
5Engagement in fashion3.811.550.320.210.290.441
Table 5. Regression results.
Table 5. Regression results.
Independent variablesAttitudes toward purchasing luxury fashion goods
Betat-valuep-value
(Constant)1.675.980.00
1Brand awareness0.362.770.01
2Acquisitive0.221.990.05
3Social Contrast0.142.670.03
4Innovation in fashion0.393.340.00
5Engagement in fashion−0.10−1.660.29
F-value11.06
p0.00
R Square0.27
Adjust R 2 0.25
Independent variablesPurchase intent toward purchasing luxury fashion goods
Betat-valuep-value
(Constant)2.115.200.00
Attitudes towards purchasing luxury fashion goods0.364.100.00
F-value17.09
p0.00
R Square0.07
Adjust R 2 0.06
Back to TopTop