Next Article in Journal
Framework for Selecting Manufacturing Simulation Software in Industry 4.0 Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Unveiling Cacao Agroforestry Sustainability through the Socio-Ecological Systems Diagnostic Framework: The Case of Four Amazonian Rural Communities in Ecuador
Previous Article in Journal
Social Economy, Environmental Proactivity, Eco-Innovation and Performance in the Spanish Wine Sector
Previous Article in Special Issue
Are Non-Perennial Rivers Considered as Valuable and Worthy of Conservation as Perennial Rivers?
Review

Transformability as a Wicked Problem: A Cautionary Tale?

1
Université Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, National Centre for Scientific Research CNRS, Grenoble INP, GAEL, 38000 Grenoble, France
2
Université Paris-Saclay, National Centre for Scientific Research CNRS, AgroParisTech, Laboratory of Ecology Systematics and Evolution ESE, 91405 Orsay, France
3
Association ORÉE, 42 Rue du Faubourg Poissonnière, 75010 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 5895; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155895
Received: 15 June 2020 / Revised: 14 July 2020 / Accepted: 15 July 2020 / Published: 22 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socio-Ecological Systems Sustainability)
Transformability is increasingly promoted as a way of moving societies toward more sustainable futures in the era of the Anthropocene, mostly because the concept of resilience has fallen short in many instances where impacts on social-ecological systems are continuous, varied, and usually unknown. While such transformations can play a crucial role in improving the sustainability of social-ecological systems, they may lead to unexpected and undesirable outcomes. This literature review on social-ecological transformability and wicked problems seeks to shed light on and acknowledge some of the limitations of transformability regarding unforeseen conditions. We argue that wicked problems arise in transformation initiatives in the presence of high complexity, deep uncertainty, deep conflicts, and divergence among stakeholders, as well as scale mismatches concerning spatial, temporal, and institutional processes. Our findings may explain why some transformation initiatives fail to generate expected changes on the ground, mainly in two cases: (a) a polarized configuration that maintains the status quo of the system to be transformed and (b) an unforeseen transformation that causes the system to lurch from crisis to crisis. To conclude, we recommend using diagnostic questions to prevent wicked problems in social-ecological transformations. View Full-Text
Keywords: social-ecological system; resilience; transformability; sustainability; wicked problems; social complexity; uncertainty social-ecological system; resilience; transformability; sustainability; wicked problems; social complexity; uncertainty
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sediri, S.; Trommetter, M.; Frascaria-Lacoste, N.; Fernandez-Manjarrés, J. Transformability as a Wicked Problem: A Cautionary Tale? Sustainability 2020, 12, 5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155895

AMA Style

Sediri S, Trommetter M, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Fernandez-Manjarrés J. Transformability as a Wicked Problem: A Cautionary Tale? Sustainability. 2020; 12(15):5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sediri, Samia, Michel Trommetter, Nathalie Frascaria-Lacoste, and Juan Fernandez-Manjarrés. 2020. "Transformability as a Wicked Problem: A Cautionary Tale?" Sustainability 12, no. 15: 5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155895

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop