Next Article in Journal
Ecological City-States in an Era of Environmental Disaster: Security, Climate Change and Biodiversity
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Open BIM and IFC to Enable a Comprehensive Consideration of Building Services within a Whole-Building LCA
Previous Article in Journal
Postural Risk in Manual Planting Operations of Poplar: Two Options Compared
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated BIM-Based LCA for the Entire Building Process Using an Existing Structure for Cost Estimation in the Swiss Context
Review

BIM and LCA Integration: A Systematic Literature Review

1
Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute, Dimičeva 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Working Group Sustainable Construction, Graz University of Technology, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, 8020 Graz, Austria
3
Architectural Engineering, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering Science, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5534; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145534
Received: 27 May 2020 / Revised: 25 June 2020 / Accepted: 30 June 2020 / Published: 9 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integration of LCA and BIM for Sustainable Construction)
To foster sustainable development, the environmental impacts of the construction sector need to be reduced substantially. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the established methodology for the quantification of environmental impacts, and therefore has been increasingly applied to assess the environmental performance of buildings. By coupling LCAs with digital design tools, e.g., building information modeling (BIM), the identification of environmental hotspots and their mitigation is possible during the design process. The objective of the study is to identify the current integration approaches, and determine the pros and cons of the integration process from different viewpoints, namely, technical, informational, organizational and functional issues. Therefore, a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) was performed. We identified 60 relevant BIM-LCA case studies and analyzed the applied BIM-LCA workflows in detail. A total of 16 of the reviewed studies applied LCA during the early design stage. These studies used a manual or semiautomatic data exchange between the BIM models and LCA tools. In most cases, contemporary BIM-LCA workflows utilized conventional spreadsheets (e.g., Excel sheets in 16 cases). However, the analysis shows that an automated link between LCA and BIM can be achieved when overcoming the technical, organizational and informational issues discussed in the paper. This could enable the streamlining of LCA applications in design practice, and thus support the necessary improvements in the environmental performance of buildings. View Full-Text
Keywords: building information modeling (BIM); life cycle assessment (LCA); systematic literature review (SLR); environmental product declarations (EPD); workflow; bill of quantities (BoQ) building information modeling (BIM); life cycle assessment (LCA); systematic literature review (SLR); environmental product declarations (EPD); workflow; bill of quantities (BoQ)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Potrč Obrecht, T.; Röck, M.; Hoxha, E.; Passer, A. BIM and LCA Integration: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145534

AMA Style

Potrč Obrecht T, Röck M, Hoxha E, Passer A. BIM and LCA Integration: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2020; 12(14):5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145534

Chicago/Turabian Style

Potrč Obrecht, Tajda, Martin Röck, Endrit Hoxha, and Alexander Passer. 2020. "BIM and LCA Integration: A Systematic Literature Review" Sustainability 12, no. 14: 5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145534

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop