Next Article in Journal
An Intelligent Framework for the Evaluation of Compliance with the Requirements of ISO 9001:2015
Next Article in Special Issue
Temperature Reduction Effects of Rooftop Garden Arrangements: A Case Study of Seoul National University
Previous Article in Journal
Validity of the “Big Data Tendency in Education” Scale as a Tool Helping to Reach Inclusive Social Development
Article

Identifying the Planning Priorities for Green Infrastructure within Urban Environments Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

1
Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
2
Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(13), 5468; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135468
Received: 1 June 2020 / Revised: 3 July 2020 / Accepted: 6 July 2020 / Published: 7 July 2020
Urban environmental issues such as declining air quality and increasing urban heat island effects can be managed by the effective use of urban green spaces. Consequently, the importance of green infrastructure (GI) has rapidly increased over time. While the various functions of GI have been investigated in numerous studies, limited research has focused on prioritizing those factors which impact the planning and development of GI. This study used literature reviews, expert surveys, and an analytic hierarchy process methodology to identify and prioritize the critical factors influencing GI during the design and construction process to enhance the role of GI in urban areas. Experts were asked to prioritize four primary (ecological, landscape, usability, and economic factors) and 16 secondary aspects of GI design. Respondents strongly agreed on the importance of the ecological aspects of GI, while the government sector also highlighted the importance of economic concerns, such as ongoing maintenance. Results indicated that the priorities for creating GI require further analysis and mediation between stakeholders. Further empirical evidence should be accumulated regarding the functions of GI for policy implementation in design and construction. View Full-Text
Keywords: green infrastructure; urban open space; analytic hierarchy process; air quality; holistic planning approach green infrastructure; urban open space; analytic hierarchy process; air quality; holistic planning approach
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.-W.; An, K. Identifying the Planning Priorities for Green Infrastructure within Urban Environments Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135468

AMA Style

Shin Y, Kim S, Lee S-W, An K. Identifying the Planning Priorities for Green Infrastructure within Urban Environments Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13):5468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135468

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Yeeun, Suyeon Kim, Sang-Woo Lee, and Kyungjin An. 2020. "Identifying the Planning Priorities for Green Infrastructure within Urban Environments Using Analytic Hierarchy Process" Sustainability 12, no. 13: 5468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135468

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop