Next Article in Journal
Cognitive Functioning, Physical Fitness, and Game Performance in a Sample of Adolescent Soccer Players
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of Eco-Efficient Body Parts for Electric Vehicles Considering Life Cycle Environmental Information
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Formal Credit and Climate Change Impact on Agricultural Production in Pakistan: A Time Series ARDL Modeling Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of a Lightweight Rear Crash Management System in a Sustainable Perspective

by
Francesco Del Pero
1,*,
Massimo Delogu
1 and
Martin Kerschbaum
2
1
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via di S. Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy
2
Toyota Motor Europe, Hoge Wei 33—Technical Centre, B-1930 Zaventem, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(13), 5243; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135243
Submission received: 23 May 2020 / Revised: 17 June 2020 / Accepted: 19 June 2020 / Published: 28 June 2020

Abstract

The paper presents an innovative lightweight design solution for the rear crash management system of a C-class car, developed within the AffordabLe LIghtweight Automobiles AlliaNCE (ALLIANCE) EU research project. The innovation provides that the reference version of the module, based on conventional steel components, is revolutionized through the introduction of extruded 6000/7000 series aluminum alloys. The two competing alternatives are described and compared in relation to design and technological solutions, including also a sustainability analysis which assesses the entire Life Cycle (LC) of the system on the basis of a wide range of environmental indicators. The lightweight solution allows achieving a large mass reduction (almost 40%), while providing improvements in terms of strength, production efficiency and design freedom. On the other hand, the introduction of new materials and manufacturing technologies entails contrasting sustainability effects depending on impact category, thus not allowing to affirm that the novel alternative is unequivocally preferable under the environmental point of view. However, the comprehensive evaluation of all sustainability aspects through a multi-criteria decision analysis (TOPSIS method) reveals that the environmental profile of the innovative design is slightly preferable with respect to the conventional one.
Keywords: eco-design; lightweighting; structural integrity; sustainability; life cycle assessment eco-design; lightweighting; structural integrity; sustainability; life cycle assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Del Pero, F.; Delogu, M.; Kerschbaum, M. Design of a Lightweight Rear Crash Management System in a Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135243

AMA Style

Del Pero F, Delogu M, Kerschbaum M. Design of a Lightweight Rear Crash Management System in a Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13):5243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Del Pero, Francesco, Massimo Delogu, and Martin Kerschbaum. 2020. "Design of a Lightweight Rear Crash Management System in a Sustainable Perspective" Sustainability 12, no. 13: 5243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135243

APA Style

Del Pero, F., Delogu, M., & Kerschbaum, M. (2020). Design of a Lightweight Rear Crash Management System in a Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability, 12(13), 5243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135243

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop