Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Low-Carbon Service Operations on Responsible Tourist Behavior: The Psychological Processes of Sustainable Cultural Tourism
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Fate of Multistressors on Carpet Shell Clam Ruditapes decussatus: Carbon Nanoparticles and Temperature Variation
Open AccessArticle

Influence of Implicit Followership Cognitive Differences on Innovation Behavior: An Empirical Analysis in China

1
College of Humanities, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Shandong, Jinan 250100, China
2
School of Business Administration, Wonkwang University, No. 460, Iksandae-ro, Iksan, Jeonbuk 54538, Korea
3
Foreign Trade and Business College of Chongqing Normal University, No.9, Xuefu Road, Hechuan District, Chongqing 401520, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(12), 4940; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124940
Received: 13 May 2020 / Revised: 5 June 2020 / Accepted: 16 June 2020 / Published: 17 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
The innovation behavior (IB) of followers is vital for individuals and organizations. It is not only an important part of individual performance but also an essential foundation of organizational innovation. In general, understanding the formation mechanism of followers’ IB could enhance organizational innovation performance and sustainable competitiveness. The innovation of this study includes the following points. First, in the previous research on the antecedent variables of the IB of followers, the key factor of implicit follow cognitive difference (IFCD) was not examined. We add this key factor to the independent variables of our formation mechanism. Second, in the relationship between IFCD and followers’ IB, we investigate the mediating role of psychological empowerment (PE) and the moderating role of person-organization Fit (P-O Fit), further shown as a mediation model with moderating variables. Third, this study adopts a longitudinal research design, and the data were obtained from 1:1 matched leaders and their followers of large and medium-sized enterprises in China. To avoid deviation in the homologous method, this study gathers data at three-month intervals to ensure that leadership’s influence on followers is effective. In this study, Amos 24.0 and SPSS 24.0 are used for empirical research. The results show IFCD has a negative effect on the IB of followers; PE has a partial mediating effect on the relationship between IFCD and IB of followers; P-O Fit plays a positive regulatory role in the relationship between IFCD and PE, and P-O Fit moderates the mediating effect of PE on the relationship between IFCD and IB. Based on our empirical research, we put forward some feasible suggestions for company managers to increase sustainability in market competition by promoting the formation of the IB of followers. View Full-Text
Keywords: innovation behavior; implicit follow cognitive difference; psychological empowerment; person-organization fit; formation mechanism; empirical study innovation behavior; implicit follow cognitive difference; psychological empowerment; person-organization fit; formation mechanism; empirical study
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, W.; Li, T.; Lu, L.; Kim, J.; Na, S. Influence of Implicit Followership Cognitive Differences on Innovation Behavior: An Empirical Analysis in China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4940.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop