Next Article in Journal
Learning Interdisciplinarity and Systems Approaches in Agroecology: Experience with the Serious Game SEGAE
Next Article in Special Issue
Cardoon Meal (Cynara cardunculus var. altilis) as Alternative Protein Source during Finishing Period in Poultry Feeding
Previous Article in Journal
An Exploration of Spatial and Social Inequalities of Urban Sports Facilities in Nanning City, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Grazing Management Influences Gut Microbial Diversity of Livestock in the Same Area
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our core network, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 16:00 and 16:30 CEST on September 25th.
Review

A Systematic Mapping of Research on Sustainability Dimensions at Farm-level in Pig Production

1
Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O.B. 234, S-53223 Skara, Sweden
2
Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O.B. 7013, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
3
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, P.O.B. 5401, S-40229 Göteborg, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4352; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114352
Received: 8 May 2020 / Revised: 20 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 May 2020 / Published: 26 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Livestock Production)
We systematically mapped the scientific literature on the sustainability of pig production at farm-level. Sustainability was considered holistically, covering its economic, environmental, and social dimensions, each consisting of a broad range of different aspects that may contradict or reinforce each other. Literature published between January 2000 and March 2020 with a geographical focus on Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand was included. A standard template with predefined keywords was used to summarise aspects of each sustainability dimension covered in identified papers. We found that papers analysing environmental sustainability were more frequent than papers analysing economic or social sustainability. However, there are many different aspects within each dimension of sustainability, hampering comparisons between studies. In addition, each dimension of sustainability has many sides, making it difficult to compare different studies, and different dimensions and aspects may have complex interrelations. Our systematic literature review revealed that these interrelations are not well understood and that possible trade-offs or synergies between different aspects of sustainability dimensions remain unidentified. This systematic mapping of the current literature on farm-level sustainability in pig production can support a more informed discussion on knowledge gaps and help prioritise future research at farm-level to enhance sustainability in pig production. View Full-Text
Keywords: pork; swine; environment; social; economic; animal welfare; ecology pork; swine; environment; social; economic; animal welfare; ecology
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gunnarsson, S.; Arvidsson Segerkvist, K.; Wallgren, T.; Hansson, H.; Sonesson, U. A Systematic Mapping of Research on Sustainability Dimensions at Farm-level in Pig Production. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114352

AMA Style

Gunnarsson S, Arvidsson Segerkvist K, Wallgren T, Hansson H, Sonesson U. A Systematic Mapping of Research on Sustainability Dimensions at Farm-level in Pig Production. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114352

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gunnarsson, Stefan, Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist, Torun Wallgren, Helena Hansson, and Ulf Sonesson. 2020. "A Systematic Mapping of Research on Sustainability Dimensions at Farm-level in Pig Production" Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114352

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop