Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Role of Outdoor Recreation to Contribute to Urban Climate Resilience
Previous Article in Journal
Bridging the Gap in the Technology Commercialization Process: Using a Three-Stage Technology–Product–Market Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Criteria for Designating Maintenance Districts in Low-Rise Residential Areas: Urban Renewal Projects in Seoul
Open AccessArticle

Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives

1
The Myers-Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2
School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(22), 6269; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226269
Received: 13 October 2019 / Revised: 4 November 2019 / Accepted: 6 November 2019 / Published: 8 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Built Environment and Future Proof Innovations)
In the year 2017, about 89% of the total energy consumed in the US was produced using non-renewable energy sources, and about 43% of tenant households were cost burdened. Local governments are in a unique position to facilitate green affordable housing, that could reduce cost burdens, environmental degradation, and environmental injustice. Nonetheless, limited studies have made progress on the costs and benefits of green affordable housing, to guide decision-making, particularly in small communities. This study investigates density bonus options for green affordable housing by analyzing construction costs, transaction prices, and spillover effects of green certifications and affordable housing units. The authors employ pooled cross-sectional construction cost and price data from 422 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) projects and 11,016 Multiple Listing Service (MLS) transactions in Virginia. Using hedonic regression analyses controlling for mediating factors, the study finds that the new construction of market-rate green certified houses is associated with small upfront costs, but large and statistically significant price premiums. In addition, the construction of market-rate green certified houses has large and statistically significant spillover effects on existing non-certified houses. Existing non-certified affordable housing units show small and often insignificant negative price impacts on the transaction prices of surrounding properties. The study concludes that the magnitude of social benefits associated with green building justifies the local provision of voluntary programs for green affordable housing, where housing is expensive relative to its basic cost of production. View Full-Text
Keywords: density incentive; earthcraft; energystar; green premium; hedonic pricing; LIHTC; rehabilitation density incentive; earthcraft; energystar; green premium; hedonic pricing; LIHTC; rehabilitation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeddi Yeganeh, A.; McCoy, A.P.; Hankey, S. Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6269.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop