Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = energystar

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 4112 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Energy Efficiency Opportunities for a Public Transportation Maintenance Facility—A Case Study
by Jordan Higgins, Aditya Ramnarayan, Roxana Family and Michael Ohadi
Energies 2024, 17(8), 1907; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081907 - 17 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1871
Abstract
A comprehensive energy audit of a light rail maintenance facility was performed to assess its energy performance and identify potential scope for improvements. The facility’s energy use intensity (EUI) for 2022 was 404 kWh/m2—more than double the benchmark EUI for maintenance [...] Read more.
A comprehensive energy audit of a light rail maintenance facility was performed to assess its energy performance and identify potential scope for improvements. The facility’s energy use intensity (EUI) for 2022 was 404 kWh/m2—more than double the benchmark EUI for maintenance facilities (151 kWh/m2) recommended by EnergyStar. Furthermore, the load factor was 0.22—significantly lower than the recommended minimum of 0.75 for an efficient building. The energy audit encompassed an in-depth evaluation of the facility’s structural and operational characteristics, comprising HVAC systems, lighting, the building envelope, and energy-intensive machinery. An energy model of the facility was developed to emulate the facility’s energy performance in 2022. Following the energy model’s validation, an analysis was conducted to identify opportunities for improving energy efficiency. Post-implementation of energy efficiency measures for the facility, the projected annual reductions are 1086 MWh of electricity, 5034 GJ of natural gas, utility savings of USD 162,402, and net GHG emissions reductions of 584 metric tons of CO2e. A subsequent 30% reduction in EUI to 283.6 kWh/m2 could be achieved with an 86% improvement in load factor, that is, increasing it from 0.22 to 0.41. This study emphasizes the need for energy audits and modeling for maintenance facilities to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section G: Energy and Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 732 KiB  
Article
Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives
by Armin Jeddi Yeganeh, Andrew Patton McCoy and Steve Hankey
Sustainability 2019, 11(22), 6269; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226269 - 8 Nov 2019
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 7813
Abstract
In the year 2017, about 89% of the total energy consumed in the US was produced using non-renewable energy sources, and about 43% of tenant households were cost burdened. Local governments are in a unique position to facilitate green affordable housing, that could [...] Read more.
In the year 2017, about 89% of the total energy consumed in the US was produced using non-renewable energy sources, and about 43% of tenant households were cost burdened. Local governments are in a unique position to facilitate green affordable housing, that could reduce cost burdens, environmental degradation, and environmental injustice. Nonetheless, limited studies have made progress on the costs and benefits of green affordable housing, to guide decision-making, particularly in small communities. This study investigates density bonus options for green affordable housing by analyzing construction costs, transaction prices, and spillover effects of green certifications and affordable housing units. The authors employ pooled cross-sectional construction cost and price data from 422 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) projects and 11,016 Multiple Listing Service (MLS) transactions in Virginia. Using hedonic regression analyses controlling for mediating factors, the study finds that the new construction of market-rate green certified houses is associated with small upfront costs, but large and statistically significant price premiums. In addition, the construction of market-rate green certified houses has large and statistically significant spillover effects on existing non-certified houses. Existing non-certified affordable housing units show small and often insignificant negative price impacts on the transaction prices of surrounding properties. The study concludes that the magnitude of social benefits associated with green building justifies the local provision of voluntary programs for green affordable housing, where housing is expensive relative to its basic cost of production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Built Environment and Future Proof Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop