Sustainable Community Gardens Require Social Engagement and Training: A Users’ Needs Analysis in Europe
1.1. Civil Engagement, Education, and Lifelong Learning in Urban Agriculture (UA)
- Formal learning usually takes place in schools, universities, or training institutions and leads to a diploma or certificate.
- Non-formal learning includes free adult education within study circles, projects, or discussion groups advancing at their own place, with no examination at the end.
- Informal learning can be found everywhere, for example, in families, in the workplace, in non governmental organizations (NGOs), in theatre groups, or can also refer to individual activities at home like reading a book.
1.2. Goal and Objectives
2.1. Users’ Needs Analysis
2.1.1. Data Collection
2.1.3. Data Analysis
2.2. Identification of Practices
2.3. Study Areas
2.3.1. UA in Berlin (Germany)
2.3.2. UA in Bologna (Italy)
2.3.3. UA in Budapest (Hungary)
2.3.4. UA in Cartagena (Spain)
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Global Users’ Needs in Europe
3.2. Regional Assessment
3.3. Community Gardening Practices towards Social Engagement and Education in Europe
3.3.1. Berlin: The Allmende-Kontor
3.3.2. Bologna: Via Gandusio Community Rooftop Garden
3.3.3. Budapest: The ZUGkert Community Garden
3.3.4. Cartagena: The Campus UPCT Community Garden and the CEAMA Reference Garden
4. Policy Recommendations
- Community garden programs should include training courses towards ensuring that both managers and users acquire the specific skills required for a successful implementation of a project.
- Programs supporting community gardens should envision the plurality of experiences and their diverse goals.
- The implementation of a top-down project must include follow-up interventions to ensure the proper development of the activity once the initial support ends.
- Partnerships with knowledge providers (e.g., universities, local associations) can fulfil the training gaps in certain skills, such as gardening skills or communication skills.
- Urban agriculture programs must embrace the interdisciplinarity required for a successful design and development of policies and projects, where plural backgrounds are essential (e.g., agronomy, urban planning, social mediation, economy, communication).
- The implementation of community gardening may ensure the availability of different types of resources (e.g., land, funding) and evaluate how the implemented activities can access them once the administrative support ends.
- In particular, land access can be a constraint for community gardening initiatives as municipal programs do not guarantee land access for a long term, but only for short-term interventions (e.g., two years) . Therefore, policies promoting such activities should focus on overcoming such barriers and developing mechanisms to guarantee long-term land access.
- City-scale policies around urban agriculture might consider the creation of a network of experiences in order to enhance the exchange of knowledge and experiences among practitioners.
- The integration of urban agriculture within city plans cannot overlook the local environment, the existing experiences, and the motivations behind gardening. Depending on the city context, urban agriculture may be mainly driven, for instance, by the citizen needs (e.g., to perform open-air activities, to engage in political actions, to create social relationships, or to improve to living quality of a neighborhood). Understanding the role and functions that urban agriculture can play in each city and region may allow to design effective policies and achieve long-term sustainability of the interventions.
Conflicts of Interest
- Eigenbrod, C.; Gruda, N. Urban vegetable for food security in cities. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourias, J.; Aubry, C.; Duchemin, E. Is Food a Motivation for Urban Gardeners? Multifunctionality and the Relative Importance of the Food Function in Urban Collective Gardens of Paris and Montreal. Agric. Hum. Values 2015, 33, 257–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opitz, I.; Specht, K.; Berges, R.; Siebert, R.; Piorr, A. Toward sustainability: Novelties, areas of learning and innovation in urban agriculture. Sustainability 2016, 8, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adler, S.; Fung, S.; Huber, G.; Young, L. Learning Our Way Towards a Sustainable Agri-Food System Three Cases from Sweden: Stockholm Farmers Market, Ramsjö Community Supported Agriculture and Järna Initiative for Local Production; Centre for Sustainable Agriculture: Uppsala, Sweden, 2003; Volume 38. [Google Scholar]
- Sanyé-Mengual, E.; Orsini, F.; Gianquinto, G. Revisiting the sustainability concept of Urban Food Production from a stakeholders’ perspective. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanyé-Mengual, E.; Specht, K.; Krikser, T.; Vanni, C.; Pennisi, G.; Orsini, F.; Gianquinto, G.P. Social Acceptance and Perceived Ecosystem Services of Urban Agriculture in Southern Europe: The Case of Bologna, Italy. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Specht, K.; Weith, T.; Swoboda, K.; Siebert, R. Socially acceptable urban agriculture businesses. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Camps-Calvet, M.; Langemeyer, J.; Calvet-Mir, L.; Gómez-Baggethun, E. Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: Insights for policy and planning. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 62, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camps-Calvet, M.; Langemeyer, J.; Calvet-Mir, L.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; March, H. Sowing Resilience and Contestation in Times of Crises: The Case of Urban Gardening Movements in Barcelona. Partecip. Con. 2015, 8, 417–442. [Google Scholar]
- Dubbeling, M. Integrating urban agriculture in the urban landscape. Urban Agric. Mag. 2011, 25, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong, D. A survey of community gardens in upstate New York: Implications for health promotion and community development. Health Place 2000, 6, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bendt, P.; Barthel, S.; Colding, J. Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anthopoulou, T.; Partalidou, M.; Moyssidis, M. Emerging municipal garden-allotments in Greece in times of economic crisis: Greening the city or combating urban neo-poverty. In Proceedings of the XXV ESRS Congress. Laboratorio Di Studi Rurali SISMONDI, Pisa, Italy, 29 July–1 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Krasny, M.E.; Russ, A.; Tidball, K.G.; Elmqvist, T. Civic ecology practices: Participatory approaches to generating and measuring ecosystem services in cities. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 7, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Saldivar-Tanaka, L.; Krasny, M.E. Culturing community development, neighborhood open space, and civic agriculture: The case of Latino community gardens in New York City. Agric. Hum. Values 2004, 21, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowker, R.; Tearle, P. Gardening as a learning environment: A study of children´s perception and understanding of school gardens as part of an international project. Learn. Environ. Res. 2007, 10, 83–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. School Gardens Concept Note Improving Child Nutrition and Education through the Promotion of School Garden Programmes; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Aguilar, O.; Waliczek, T.; Zajicek, J. Growing Environmental Stewards: The Overall Effect of a School Gardening Program on Environmental Attitudes and Environmental Locus of Control of Different Demographic Groups of Elementary School Children. Horttechnology 2008, 18, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Parmer, S.M.; Salisbury-Glennon, J.; Shannon, D.; Struempler, B. School Gardens: An Experiential Learning Approach for a Nutrition Education Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Knowledge, Preference, and Consumption among Second-grade Students. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2009, 41, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Commission (EC). Presidency Conclusions—Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000; European Commission (EC): London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission (EC). Lifelong Learning Programme 2007–2013; European Commission (EC): London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Waliczek, T.M.; Mattson, R.H.; Zajicek, J.M. Benefits of community gardening on quality-of-life issues. J. Environ. Hortic. 1996, 14, 204–209. [Google Scholar]
- Ghose, R.; Pettygrove, M. Urban Community Gardens as Spaces of Citizenship: Urban Community Gardens as Spaces of Citizenship. Antipode 2014, 46, 1092–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKillip, J. Need Analysis: Tools for the Human Services and Education; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Martens, D.; Frick, V. Gemeinschaftsgärten: Motive zur Initiierung und Einfluss auf Erholungserleben. Umweltpsychologie 2014, 18, 103–123. [Google Scholar]
- Martens, D.; Zacharias, M.; Hehl, F. Gemeinschaftsgärten? Ja, bitte–aber wie? In Wissen Wuchern Lassen-Ein Handbuch zum Lernen in Urbanen Gärten; Halder, S., Martens, D., Münnich, G., Lassalle, A., Aenis, T., Eds.; AG SPAK: Neu-Ulm, Germany, 2014; pp. 48–93. [Google Scholar]
- Gasperi, D.; Pennisi, G.; Rizzati, N.; Magrefi, F.; Bazzocchi, G.; Mezzacapo, U.; Stefani, M.C.; Sanyé-Mengual, E.; Orsini, F.; Gianquinto, G. Towards regenerated and productive vacant areas through urban horticulture: Lessons from Bologna, Italy. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orsini, F.; Gasperi, D.; Marchetti, L.; Piovene, C.; Draghetti, S.; Ramazzotti, S.; Bazzocchi, G.; Gianquinto, G. Exploring the production capacity of rooftop gardens (RTGs) in urban agriculture: The potential impact on food and nutrition security, biodiversity and other ecosystem services in the city of Bologna. Food Secur. 2014, 6, 781–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fáczányi, Z. The Interpretation of Budapest’s Community Gardens from the Approach of Landscape Architecture and Sociology; Szent István University: Gödöllő, Hungary, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- De Zeeuw, H.; Komisar, J.; Sanyé-Mengual, E.; Kahane, R.; Gianquinto, G.; Geoffriau, E.; Sian Sia, C.; Rodríguez-Delfín, A.; Tohmé Tawk, S.; el Omari, H.; et al. A geography of urban agriculture in 20 projects. In Rooftop Urban Agriculture; Orsini, F., Dubbeling, M., de Zeeuw, H., Gianquinto, G., Eds.; Springer International Publiching AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 309–382. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, N.; Reynolds, K. Resource needs for a socially just and sustainable urban agriculture system: Lessons from New York City. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2014, 30, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanyé-Mengual, E.; Specht, K.; Grapsa, E.; Orsini, F.; Gianquinto, G. How can innovation in urban agriculture contribute to sustainability? A characterization and evaluation study in Western Europe. Sustainability 2019. (under review). [Google Scholar]
- Specht, K.; Sanyé-Mengual, E. Risks in urban rooftop agriculture: Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions to ensure efficient policymaking. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 69, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomaier, S.; Specht, K.; Henckel, D.; Dierich, A.; Siebert, R.; Freisinger, U.B.; Sawicka, M. Farming in and on urban buildings: Present practice and specific novelties of Zero-Acreage Farming (ZFarming). Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2015, 30, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martens, D.; Artola, M. Nachhaltig wirtschaften auch ohne gute Vorsätze? Urban Gardening als Nährboden für nachhaltiges Handeln. In Soziale Innovationen für Nachhaltigen Konsum. Wissenschaftliche Perspektiven, Strategien der Förderung und Gelebte Praxis; Jaeger-Erben, M., Rückert-John, J., Schäfer, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; pp. 305–313. [Google Scholar]
|NAQ1 (Trainers)||NAQ2 (Gardeners)|
and community building
of the community
|Bologna (Italy)||n = 30|
Most of the people involved in the survey were males and females aged between 20 and 40.
|n = 90|
Most of the people involved in the survey were males and females aged from 40 to 70 years old.
|Berlin (Germany)||n = 30|
People involved in the survey were 27% male and 73% female, in the range of 28–67 years of age.
|n = 30|
People involved in the survey were 21% male and 79% female, aged from 30 to 40 years old.
|Budapest (Hungary)||n = 30|
People involved in the survey were males and females in the ages between 20 and 65 years old.
|n = 30|
People involved in the survey were males and females in the age of 20–65 years old.
|Cartagena (Spain)||n = 30|
People involved in the survey were males (36%) and females (64%) in the age range of 30–67 years old.
|n = 30|
People involved in the survey were males (36%) and females (64%) in the age range of 30–67 years old.
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Ochoa, J.; Sanyé-Mengual, E.; Specht, K.; Fernández, J.A.; Bañón, S.; Orsini, F.; Magrefi, F.; Bazzocchi, G.; Halder, S.; Martens, D.; et al. Sustainable Community Gardens Require Social Engagement and Training: A Users’ Needs Analysis in Europe. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143978
Ochoa J, Sanyé-Mengual E, Specht K, Fernández JA, Bañón S, Orsini F, Magrefi F, Bazzocchi G, Halder S, Martens D, et al. Sustainable Community Gardens Require Social Engagement and Training: A Users’ Needs Analysis in Europe. Sustainability. 2019; 11(14):3978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143978Chicago/Turabian Style
Ochoa, Jesus, Esther Sanyé-Mengual, Kathrin Specht, Juan A. Fernández, Sebastián Bañón, Francesco Orsini, Francesca Magrefi, Giovanni Bazzocchi, Severin Halder, Doerte Martens, and et al. 2019. "Sustainable Community Gardens Require Social Engagement and Training: A Users’ Needs Analysis in Europe" Sustainability 11, no. 14: 3978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143978