Next Article in Journal
Factor Decomposition of the Changes in the Rural Regional Income Inequality in Southwestern Mountainous Area of China
Next Article in Special Issue
GIS Analysis of Land-Use Change in Threatened Landscapes by Xylella fastidiosa
Previous Article in Journal
Operational Efficiency of Chinese Provincial Electricity Grid Enterprises: An Evaluation Employing a Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multicriteria Evaluation of Tourism Potential in the Central Highlands of Vietnam: Combining Geographic Information System (GIS), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Article

Using Information on Settlement Patterns to Improve the Spatial Distribution of Population in Coastal Impact Assessments

Department of Geography, Kiel University, Ludewig-Meyn-Str. 14, 24118 Kiel, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(9), 3170; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093170
Received: 15 July 2018 / Revised: 29 August 2018 / Accepted: 3 September 2018 / Published: 5 September 2018
Broad-scale impact and vulnerability assessments are essential for informing decisions on long-term adaptation planning at the national, regional, or global level. These assessments rely on population data for quantifying exposure to different types of hazards. Existing population datasets covering the entire globe at resolutions of 2.5 degrees to 30 arc-seconds are based on information available at administrative-unit level and implicitly assume uniform population densities within these units. This assumption can lead to errors in impact assessments and particularly in coastal areas that are densely populated. This study proposes and compares simple approaches to regionalize population within administrative units in the German Baltic Sea region using solely information on urban extent from the Global Urban Footprint (GUF). Our results show that approaches using GUF can reduce the error in predicting population totals of municipalities by factor 2 to 3. When assessing exposed population, we find that the assumption of uniform population densities leads to an overestimation of 120% to 140%. Using GUF to regionalise population within administrative units reduce these errors by up to 50%. Our results suggest that the proposed simple modeling approaches can result in significantly improved distribution of population within administrative units and substantially improve the results of exposure analyses. View Full-Text
Keywords: spatial population; Global Urban Footprint; Dasymetric Mapping; coastal exposure; impact assessment; Baltic Sea spatial population; Global Urban Footprint; Dasymetric Mapping; coastal exposure; impact assessment; Baltic Sea
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Merkens, J.-L.; Vafeidis, A.T. Using Information on Settlement Patterns to Improve the Spatial Distribution of Population in Coastal Impact Assessments. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093170

AMA Style

Merkens J-L, Vafeidis AT. Using Information on Settlement Patterns to Improve the Spatial Distribution of Population in Coastal Impact Assessments. Sustainability. 2018; 10(9):3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093170

Chicago/Turabian Style

Merkens, Jan-Ludolf, and Athanasios T. Vafeidis 2018. "Using Information on Settlement Patterns to Improve the Spatial Distribution of Population in Coastal Impact Assessments" Sustainability 10, no. 9: 3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093170

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop