Next Article in Journal
An Original Approach Combining CFD, Linearized Models, and Deformation of Trees for Urban Wind Power Assessment
Next Article in Special Issue
Job Loss in a Group of Older Canadian Workers: Challenges in the Sustainable Labour Market Reintegration Process
Previous Article in Journal
Zonation and Directional Dynamics of Mangrove Forests Derived from Time-Series Satellite Imagery in Mai Po, Hong Kong
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seeking Control in a Precarious Environment: Sustainable Practices as an Adaptive Strategy to Living under Uncertainty
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Academic Relational Civility as a Key Resource for Sustaining Well-Being

Department of Education and Psychology (Psychology Section), University of Florence, Via di San Salvi, 12 Complesso di San Salvi, Padiglione 26, 50135 Firenze, Italy
Lynch School of Education, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(6), 1914;
Received: 24 April 2018 / Revised: 31 May 2018 / Accepted: 5 June 2018 / Published: 7 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development)
PDF [238 KB, uploaded 7 June 2018]


In the 21st century, which has been characterized by complexity, instability, and continuous change, the well-being of individuals is threatened. The health and well-being of individuals are recognized as one of the 17 sustainable development goals of the United Nations. From a primary prevention perspective, physical and psychological health can be augmented through the early identification and promotion of key psychological resources that sustain well-being across one’s lifetime. With that goal in mind, the present study explored potential relationships between academic relational civility and both hedonic (positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction) and eudaimonic well-being (meaning in life and flourishing), controlling for the effect of personality traits among university students. The Big Five Questionnaire (BFQ), the Academic Relational Civility Scale (ARCS), the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), the Meaning in Life Measure (MLM), and the Flourishing Scale (FS), were administered to 241 Italian university students. Regression analyses identified that academic relational civility contributed significantly to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being beyond the contribution of stable personality factors. Academic relational civility may represent one psychological resource for supporting and sustaining hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, suggesting the need for further research and intervention. View Full-Text
Keywords: academic relational civility; hedonic well-being; eudaimonic well-being; personality traits; psychology of sustainability academic relational civility; hedonic well-being; eudaimonic well-being; personality traits; psychology of sustainability
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Fabio, A.; Kenny, M.E. Academic Relational Civility as a Key Resource for Sustaining Well-Being. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1914.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top