Next Article in Journal
Assessment of the Ecosystem Service Function of Sandy Lands at Different Times Following Aerial Seeding of an Endemic Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty as a Part of Customer-Based Corporate Sustainability in the Sector of Mobile Communications Services
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of the European Union Landing Obligation Focusing on Its Implications for Fisheries and the Environment
Open AccessArticle

Research on the Spatial Differentiation and Driving Factors of Tourism Enterprises’ Efficiency: Chinese Scenic Spots, Travel Agencies, and Hotels

1
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Tourism College, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(4), 901; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040901
Received: 1 February 2018 / Revised: 11 March 2018 / Accepted: 12 March 2018 / Published: 21 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Management and Sustainable Development)
Tourism is an important sustainable industry in the economy that optimizes the industrial structure. Thus, as a core part of this market, tourism enterprises perform a key role in the effective operation of this industry. This paper applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Malmquist index (MI) models to calculate the efficiency of Chinese tourism enterprises between 2005 and 2014. Results showed that: (1) The efficiency and the total factor productivity change index (TFPC) of tourism enterprises remained low, and both have decreased. (2) The efficiency of regional tourism enterprises across China cloud be characterized as high in the east region, low in the central region, and high in both northeast and western regions. (3) The efficiency levels of the cities of Beijing and Shanghai were ahead of the country over the period of this study, while Chongqing, Tibet, Qinghai, and Ningxia all possess a number of obvious advantages in the western region. (4) Centers of overall tourism enterprise efficiency mainly moved in a southeast-to-northwest direction over the period of this research. (5) The spatial autocorrelation of tourism enterprise efficiencies is also assessed in this study, and the results show that the comprehensive efficiency (CE) of tourism enterprises in southeastern coastal regions of China tended to a certain spatial agglomeration effect, while the correlation between the central region and northern China was not significant. (6) The Geodetector model is applied to analyze the key factors driving the spatial differentiation of tourism enterprise efficiencies, and the results show that the degree of opening to the outside world, potential human capital, and traffic conditions were the most important factors driving spatial differentiation in the efficiency of tourism enterprises. View Full-Text
Keywords: efficiency of tourism enterprises; spatial differentiation; DEA-Malmquist; spatial autocorrelation; Geodetector efficiency of tourism enterprises; spatial differentiation; DEA-Malmquist; spatial autocorrelation; Geodetector
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, B.; Dong, S.; Ba, D.; Li, Y.; Li, F.; Liu, H.; Li, Z.; Zhao, M. Research on the Spatial Differentiation and Driving Factors of Tourism Enterprises’ Efficiency: Chinese Scenic Spots, Travel Agencies, and Hotels. Sustainability 2018, 10, 901.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop