Next Article in Journal
Harnessing a ‘Currency Matrix’ for Performance Measurement in Cooperatives: A Multi-Phased Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Evolution of International Scientific Collaboration in Fuel Cells during 1998–2017: A Social Network Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Pollution Assessment of Trace Elements in Agricultural Soils around Copper Mining Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Surveying the Solar Power Gap: Assessing the Spatial Distribution of Emerging Photovoltaic Solar Adoption in the State of Georgia, U.S.A.
Open AccessArticle

Residential Energy Sustainability in China and Germany: The Impact of National Energy Policy System

by Chunhong Sheng 1,*, Yun Cao 2 and Bing Xue 3
1
China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
School of Governance, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
3
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e.V. (IASS), 14467 Potsdam, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(12), 4535; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124535
Received: 6 November 2018 / Revised: 25 November 2018 / Accepted: 29 November 2018 / Published: 1 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue International Perspectives on Sustainable Energy Transition)
The energy consumption and carbon emission of Chinese households is growing rapidly and will continue to do so for the near future. Currently, Chinese energy policies mainly focus on the industrial sector instead of the residential sector. Among industrialized countries, Germany has performed relatively well in the residential sector, which can provide valuable lessons for China. This paper investigates the policy-making, implementation, and resulting patterns of Chinese and German residential energy policies from a multi-level perspective. The policy system study provides a holistic view over the factors influencing residential energy sustainability. The main findings are: (1) the German residential energy policy system follows a hybrid policy model, combining top-down and bottom-up policy designs, with more demand-side or market-oriented policies, and a high level of public participation, resulting in remarkable headway toward sustainability in the residential energy sector; and (2) the Chinese energy policy system is characterized by top-down, supply-side oriented market policies with limited public participation. The policy implication of this study for China is to shift its top-down policy paradigm to a hybrid policy model that facilitates public participation in the residential energy sector. View Full-Text
Keywords: residential energy; energy policy; China; Germany; public participation residential energy; energy policy; China; Germany; public participation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sheng, C.; Cao, Y.; Xue, B. Residential Energy Sustainability in China and Germany: The Impact of National Energy Policy System. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4535.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop