Next Article in Journal
Analyzing the Finishing Works Service Life Pattern of Public Housing in South Korea by Probabilistic Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
The Politics of Selection: Towards a Transformative Model of Environmental Innovation
Previous Article in Journal
Consumer Attitude and Behavioral Intention toward Collaborative Consumption of Shared Services
Previous Article in Special Issue
Indicators on the Impacts of Climate Change on Biodiversity in Germany—Data Driven or Meeting Political Needs?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Measure or Management?—Resource Use Indicators for Policymakers Based on Microdata by Households

1
Wuppertal Institut fuer Klima, Umwelt, Energie gGmbH, Division Sustainable Production and Consumption, Doeppersberg 19, 42103 Wuppertal, Germany
2
Industrial Design, Folkwang University of the Arts, Klemensborn 39, 45239 Essen, Germany
3
Faculty of Management and Economics, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(12), 4467; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124467
Submission received: 28 September 2018 / Revised: 14 November 2018 / Accepted: 16 November 2018 / Published: 28 November 2018

Abstract

Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG 12) requires sustainable production and consumption. One indicator named in the SDG for resource use is the (national) material footprint. A method and disaggregated data basis that differentiates the material footprint for production and consumption according to, e.g., sectors, fields of consumption as well as socioeconomic criteria does not yet exist. We present two methods and its results for analyzing resource the consumption of private households based on microdata: (1) an indicator based on representative expenditure data in Germany and (2) an indicator based on survey data from a web tool. By these means, we aim to contribute to monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals, especially the sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources. Indicators based on microdata ensure that indicators can be disaggregated by socioeconomic characteristics like age, sex, income, or geographic location. Results from both methods show a right-skewed distribution of the Material Footprint in Germany and, for instance, an increasing Material Footprint with increasing household income. The methods enable researchers and policymakers to evaluate trends in resource use and to differentiate between lifestyles and along socioeconomic characteristics. This, in turn, would allow us to tailor sustainable consumption policies to household needs and restrictions.
Keywords: sustainable production and consumption; resource indicator; sustainable development goals; material footprint; household consumption; microdata sustainable production and consumption; resource indicator; sustainable development goals; material footprint; household consumption; microdata

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buhl, J.; Liedtke, C.; Teubler, J.; Bienge, K.; Schmidt, N. Measure or Management?—Resource Use Indicators for Policymakers Based on Microdata by Households. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124467

AMA Style

Buhl J, Liedtke C, Teubler J, Bienge K, Schmidt N. Measure or Management?—Resource Use Indicators for Policymakers Based on Microdata by Households. Sustainability. 2018; 10(12):4467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buhl, Johannes, Christa Liedtke, Jens Teubler, Katrin Bienge, and Nicholas Schmidt. 2018. "Measure or Management?—Resource Use Indicators for Policymakers Based on Microdata by Households" Sustainability 10, no. 12: 4467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124467

APA Style

Buhl, J., Liedtke, C., Teubler, J., Bienge, K., & Schmidt, N. (2018). Measure or Management?—Resource Use Indicators for Policymakers Based on Microdata by Households. Sustainability, 10(12), 4467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124467

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop