Next Article in Journal
Capturing the Risk-Pooling Effect through Inventory Planning and Demand Switching
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Coal Fines Migration on Coal Core Water Flooding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Perceptual Range on Human Perceived Restoration
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 4103; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114103

Urban River Transformation and the Landscape Garden City Movement in China

1
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2
College of Architecture and Landscape, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3
Collegium—Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
4
College of Environmental Design, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 September 2018 / Revised: 29 October 2018 / Accepted: 2 November 2018 / Published: 8 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human–River Interactions in Cities)
Full-Text   |   PDF [18655 KB, uploaded 8 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

The practice of enhancing existing rivers and creating entirely new waterscapes has exploded in China over the past two decades. In our study of 104 randomly selected cities across China, we identified 14 types of river projects based on grey literature reports and their appearance on sequential aerial imagery, falling into three categories: ‘engineering’, ‘waterfront spaces’ and ‘ecological’ projects. ‘Waterfront spaces’ is the most common (60.5%), followed by ‘engineering’ (28.7%) and ‘ecological’ (10.8%). Using multiple stepwise regression, we found that the types of projects undertaken were strongly influenced by factors such as climate, social-economic setting, and ‘Landscape Garden City’ designation. Designation as a ‘Landscape Garden City’ was correlated with ‘waterfront spaces’, but not ‘engineering’ and ‘ecological’ projects. We found that cities in drier climates (as measured by ‘precipitation minus evaporation’) constructed more projects and they included many projects that impounded seasonal rivers to create year-round water bodies. Based on our results, we conclude that Chinese cities are still in the process of ‘decorating’ rivers, and that the ‘Landscape Garden City’ designation promoted such ‘decorating’ projects, especially ‘linear greening’ projects and ‘public spaces along rivers’. The results also demonstrate that the new river projects in China are often at odds with the local climate. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban river; Landscape Garden City; engineering; waterfront spaces; new waterscape urban river; Landscape Garden City; engineering; waterfront spaces; new waterscape
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, S.; Kondolf, G.M.; Li, D. Urban River Transformation and the Landscape Garden City Movement in China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4103.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top