Next Article in Journal
Crude Extract and Phenol-Rich Fractions from Vernonia amygdalina Leaves Ameliorates Streptozotocin-Induced Type 1 Diabetes in Rats by Mitigating Hepatic Injury, Dyslipidemia, and Production of Oxido-Inflammatory Markers
Previous Article in Journal
Glyphosate-Induced Metabolic and Immune Modulation in Hepatoma Cells: Identification of Key Genes as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets Using an In Silico Systems Biology Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification, Quantification, and Characterization of Microplastics in Skincare and Treatment Creams: A Potential Health Concern Related to the Exposure Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Micro- and Nanoplastics Exposure Across the Lifespan: One Health Implications for Aging and Longevity

by
Chantalle Moulton
1,†,
Anna Baroni
1,† and
Ennio Tasciotti
1,2,*
1
Human Longevity Program, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00166 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, San Raffaele Roma University, 00166 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Xenobiot. 2026, 16(2), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16020052
Submission received: 12 February 2026 / Revised: 13 March 2026 / Accepted: 16 March 2026 / Published: 19 March 2026

Abstract

Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are pervasive environmental contaminants with growing relevance for human health across the lifespan. Older adults may be especially vulnerable to their effects due to cumulative lifetime exposure, age-related physiological changes, and a higher burden of chronic disease. Adopting a One Health perspective, this review synthesizes current evidence on the sources, exposure pathways, and biological effects of MNPs, integrating findings from environmental, animal, and human studies with a specific focus on aging populations. Experimental studies consistently show that MNP exposure triggers oxidative stress, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cellular senescence, mechanisms central to biological aging. These processes are linked to dysfunction of the cardiovascular, nervous, gastrointestinal, and immune systems, suggesting that MNPs may contribute to the development or progression of age-related diseases. Within the One Health framework, MNPs also act as carriers of chemical additives and environmental pollutants, potentially amplifying health risks through combined and cumulative exposures along food chains and ecosystems. Despite increasing mechanistic evidence, direct epidemiological data in older adults remain limited. This review highlights key knowledge gaps and emphasizes the need for integrative, longitudinal research to clarify the role of MNPs in aging and to inform public health and environmental policy.

1. Introduction

Plastic is a consistent feature of modern life, but the practical advantage based on its long-lasting nature has also led to the emerging issue of global “plasticization” of ecosystems, where the progressive fragmentation of plastic waste has generated micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) across air, water, soil, and food webs [1].
The reason why MNPs are challenging xenobiotic stressors is that, in addition to their ubiquity, they are also extremely diverse, in terms of size, shape, polymer chemistry, and weathering state [2] (Wright et al., 2024). Moreover, MNPs can interact with polymer additives, adsorb and transport heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, microbes, and other environmental contaminants, acting as mobile vectors that facilitate their entry into organisms and tissues where these compounds may subsequently desorb and enhance toxicity [3,4,5,6,7]. This real-world complexity confounds exposure reconstruction, dosimetry, and causal inference, yet the pervasiveness of contamination implies that, under plausible chronic exposure scenarios, even small individual-level risks could translate into substantial population-level burdens, especially in aging societies [8,9,10].
MNPs are increasingly recognized as contaminants of global relevance within a One Health framework. One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that recognizes that the health of humans, animals, and ecosystems are interconnected and must be addressed collaboratively across disciplines to effectively prevent and manage health threats [11,12]. It promotes coordinated actions among fields such as medicine, veterinary science, environmental science, and public health to address complex issues including zoonotic diseases, antimicrobial resistance, and environmental degradation [11,13].This framework is useful to understand the scale and persistence of plastic production and the capacity of plastic debris to fragment, disperse, and enter food webs. Current production and consumption patterns ensure that plastic waste will remain in the environment for decades, progressively generating globally distributed reservoirs of MNPs [14,15]. Their integration into trophic networks links ecosystem integrity, animal health, and human exposure, particularly through dietary routes [16]. The detection of MNPs in food, drinking water, and human biological samples raises concern that chronic, low-dose exposure may have subtle but systemic effects that develop over long timescales [17,18]. Although analytical advances now allow movement beyond simple detection toward quantification of dose and persistence, limited standardization and persistent contamination issues continue to constrain population-level risk assessment [19].
Aging provides a biologically relevant context for evaluating MNP exposure, as environmental insults accumulate across the life course and may interact with age-related declines in physiological reserve. As resilience decreases with age, comparable exposures can exert greater functional consequences, amplifying vulnerability at the population level [20,21]. Older adults therefore represent cohorts with substantial cumulative exposure via inhalation and ingestion, even when daily doses are low [22]. The fate of internalized MNPs likely depends on particle size, shape, polymer chemistry, and surface properties, yet environmentally realistic toxicokinetic data remain limited [23]. Concurrently, aging is characterized by immunosenescence, chronic low-grade inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired repair capacity, and altered barrier integrity. Furthermore, accelerated aging refers to the premature accumulation of molecular hallmarks of aging, such as genomic instability, epigenetic alterations, mitochondrial dysfunction, and chronic inflammatory signaling, occurring at a faster rate than expected for chronological age [24]. Mechanistic studies of MNP exposure repeatedly report oxidative stress, inflammatory signalling, immune dysregulation, mitochondrial damage, and cellular senescence, closely aligning with pathways central to biological aging and age-related disease susceptibility [25,26].
The relevance of later life is further strengthened by the high prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, reflecting reduced physiological reserves across multiple organ systems [27,28]. Because rehabilitation in the elderly occurs in the context of pre-existing frailty, multimorbidity, and limited recovery capacity, MNP research must extend beyond general populations to address how these exposures may interfere with recovery trajectories in already compromised individuals. In this context, additional environmental stressors that promote inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, or oxidative stress may accelerate disease progression, even if they are not primary causal agents. Emerging evidence suggests that MNPs can modulate pathways involved in vascular, endothelial, and neurobiological dysfunction, supporting their consideration as modifiers of age-related disease trajectories [26,29]. Exposure across the lifespan is also affected by a heterogeneous set of causes, shaped by socio-economic conditions, residential and occupational histories, and indoor environments, creating inequalities in cumulative exposure and vulnerability. This mirrors patterns observed for other environmental stressors, such as heat and air pollution, where older adults experience disproportionate impacts driven by multimorbidity and altered physiology [20,21,30,31]. Importantly, focusing on aging does not imply deterministic causality, but reflects a biologically informed hypothesis that MNP exposure may influence the pace of biological aging through convergence on pathways of inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and functional decline [32].
A One Health perspective is essential to integrate environmental, animal, and human evidence, recognizing MNPs as shared exposures linking ecosystem health with animal well-being and human longevity. Although originally emphasized in infectious disease contexts, One Health is increasingly applied to chronic disease prevention and healthy aging, reflecting the interdependence of safe environments with human longevity [33,34,35]. MNP exposure spans ecosystems and species, with wildlife and domestic animals encountering similar ingestion and inhalation routes that shape human exposure patterns [27,36,37]. Comparative studies indicate that pollution and habitat degradation can accelerate aging-related phenotypes via oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune dysfunction, supporting the relevance of conserved mechanisms [38,39]. Evidence of MNP-associated gastrointestinal, metabolic, and immune disturbances in non-human models may therefore inform human aging while underscoring ecosystem-level harm [40].
Within this framework, MNPs also challenge conventional toxicology. A geroscience-informed One Health lens conceptualizes pollutants as potential accelerators of aging processes and emphasizes reduced compensatory capacity in older organisms exposed to cumulative, multisystem stressors [34,41]. Interpretation is further complicated by environmental weathering, biofilm formation, and co-exposure to other pollutants, all of which can modify particle reactivity and obscure classical hazard attribution [42,43,44].
The objective of this review is therefore to evaluate MNPs as persistent, low-dose xenobiotics within an aging population using a One Health approach, by reviewing the most recent findings in the literature, and give a review of what is currently known about these contaminants. Here, we synthesize evidence on MNP sources, environmental fate, and exposure routes as well as mechanistic data linking MNP exposure to processes relevant to aging [14,29,45,46,47]. By combining environmental, animal, and human evidence, this review highlights shared mechanisms and identifies key gaps relevant to causality and risk assessment [48,49,50,51]. Given the threat that these MNPs present to environmental, animal, and, most importantly, human health, this research is essential to better understand and map the situation to remedy the identified negative effects.

2. Defining Micro- and Nanoplastics

Due to the fact that MNPs are still governed by operational, method-dependent definitions, it is necessary to state how these terms are used in this review. In practice, boundaries are constrained by analytical detectability, and differences in reporting metrics (particle number vs. mass), polymer identification, and surface characterization can limit cross-study comparability and exposure–response inference [52,53,54].
This definitional problem is not ‘simply a semantic issue’. It shapes exposure assumptions, determining which particles are represented in experimental models, and influences how mechanistic results are translated into risk, particularly in aging research, where barrier integrity, clearance capacity, and sensitivity to chronic low-dose stressors may change across the life course [55,56,57].

2.1. Terminology and Size Classifications Definitions

Microplastics (MPs) have most frequently been described as solid plastic particles between 5 mm and 1 µm in size [58]. This size-based convention is now widely adopted across environmental monitoring and toxicology, although refinements increasingly emphasize that MPs are synthetic or heavily modified polymers that are persistent, insoluble, and particulate [1]. By contrast, nanoplastics (NPs) lack a single agreed definition. A commonly used working definition includes particles in the range of 1 nm to 1 μm in size that display colloidal properties like Brownian motion, high specific surface area, and high affinity to natural colloids [59,60,61].
Importantly with respect to aging biology, this operational differentiation has functional significance because with smaller size in the sub-micrometer range, there is an increased probability of translocation, cell internalization, and subcellular interactions, and thus a shift in fundamental questions from irritation and barrier function effects linked with MPs, towards immune recognition, mitochondria disruption, and relevance/retention effects with NPs [62,63,64].
MNPs are also frequently categorized by origin as primary or secondary. Primary particles are intentionally manufactured at micro- or nanoscale and deliberately added to personal care products, industrial abrasives, specialized applications, and pre-production pellets/powders [65,66,67,68]. Secondary particles result from the successive erosion of larger plastic debris, comprising packaging, textiles, tires, paints, and marine debris, facilitated by mechanical abrasion, UV radiation, thermal cycling, and biological activity [69,70,71].
For health-relevant risk interpretation, secondary particles are particularly important because they typically dominate environmental burdens and exhibit highly heterogeneous morphologies (irregular fragments, films, fibres) and complex “exposure histories” that include prolonged weathering, additive leaching, sorption of co-pollutants, and biofilm colonization [72,73,74].
Due to the fact that secondary MNPs accumulate complex exposure histories (weathering, additive loss, pollutant sorption, and biofilm growth), their surface properties and reactivity can differ markedly from pristine materials; accordingly, environmentally aged particles are typically considered more exposure-relevant test materials than pristine, uniform spherical beads frequently used in experimental studies [75].

2.2. Physicochemical Properties Related to Aging Biology

2.2.1. Size, Shape, Polymer Type and Surface Chemistry

Particle size, shape, polymer type, and surface chemistry control the translocation of MNPs through the environment and interactions with biological barriers after oral or pulmonary administration [64,76]. Smaller particles, below the micrometer scale, exhibit higher surface area and colloidal stability and tend to more successfully cross biological barriers and reach secondary organs after administration compared with the same mass concentrations above the micrometers scale [77].
Shape further influences aerodynamic and cellular contact parameters: fibres and irregular shapes can exert more mechanical stresses at the expense of different biological barriers and tend to induce more severe site inflammation compared to spherical MNP with the same exposed surface area under similar administration conditions [1,78].
The type of polymer can also be important due to differing densities, crystallinity, and additive composition between common types (e.g., PE, PP, PS, PVC, PET) [14,79]. Surface chemistry is dynamic: weathering processes (surface oxidation and surface fractures) can change hydrophobicity, surface charge properties, surface topography, and sorption properties, potentially impacting interactions with heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, and biological surfaces [43,80].
Even so-called “eco-friendly” or biodegradable plastics are not inherently safe at the micro- and nanoscale. Polylactic acid (PLA) MNPs cross biological barriers in mice, accumulate in the male reproductive tract, disrupt the blood–testis barrier, damage sperm mitochondria, and impair spermatogenesis, reducing sperm count and motility in vivo [81]. In zebrafish and C. elegans, pristine and especially UV- or photo-aged PLA MNPs induce oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, and transgenerational reproductive toxicity at environmentally relevant µg–mg/L concentrations [82,83,84,85]. In vitro, PLA and other biodegradable MNPs can alter gut microbiota after simulated digestion and are internalized by human cell lines, where PLA and polybutylene succinate (PBS) particles trigger cytotoxicity and oxidative stress [86,87]. Reviews further report that PLA, polycaprolactone (PCL) and polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) can cause developmental, reproductive, immune and endocrine disruption across multiple models, sometimes with toxicity comparable to conventional plastics [88,89,90]. Together these findings indicate that reduced carbon footprint does not necessarily imply lower toxicological risk.
Given the pivotal role of both oxidative stress and inflammation in particle-mediated responses as well as biological aging, these factors are not simply environmental details, as they might impact the extent and type of immune system dysregulation and age-related physiological impairment [91].

2.2.2. Aging, Weathering, and Bio-Corona Formation

In natural conditions, multi-factor aging processes of MNPs are driven by UV irradiation, temperature cycling, mechanical wear, redox reactions, and biological activity [63,78]. Across studies, aging commonly results in surface fragmentation, the introduction of oxygen-containing functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl and carbonyl), and changes in roughness and crystallinity, which can promote further fragmentation and increase the fraction of potentially penetrating particles [43,72,92]. Aging can also increase contaminant adsorption, for example, smaller and more oxidized particles may exhibit greater capacity to adsorb metals under certain environmental conditions, increasing the likelihood of mixture exposures [93,94,95].
Concurrently, MNPs rapidly acquire an eco-corona or bio-corona, which are layers of natural organic matter, proteins, lipids, and microorganisms (including biofilms) that redefine particle identity from the perspective of cells and tissues [96,97]. After uptake in organisms, the way this bio-corona is progressively remodelled as micro- and nanoplastics transit from the intestine into the bloodstream and onward to organs such as the liver or brain, and how these shifting molecular coats modulate recognition and handling of the particles by aged immune cells, remain critical open questions for future investigation [98].
In aquatic systems, adsorption of organic materials may influence the degree of aggregation, stability, and fate [99], while the natural aging process allows colonization by bacterial populations whose profiles are determined by environmental factors [100,101]. Additionally, in biological fluids, coronas can alter the recognition mechanism between immune and endothelial cells, the uptake mechanism, and the modification of the redox signalling pathways may be influenced, which is related to inflammaging and increased susceptibility to endothelial damage with age [102,103,104]. Combined, these various factors reinforce the need for incorporating environmentally relevant particle aging and corona development into experimental studies and risk assessments, particularly those that seek to understand how low doses may interact with declining physiological resilience factors in older populations [80,96].

3. Environmental Sources and Distribution Across the One Health Continuum

MNPs are now pervasive across air, water, soil, and biological systems, creating continuous exposure for humans, livestock, wildlife, and ecosystems within a One Health context (Table 1). Their widespread presence results from sustained global plastic production, environmental fragmentation, and inefficient waste management, followed by long-distance atmospheric and hydrological transport across interconnected environmental compartments (Figure 1) [105,106,107,108].

3.1. Environmental Compartments and Transport

MNPs are consistently detected in the atmosphere, seawater, rivers, lakes, estuaries, sediments, and aquatic organisms across all continents, confirming global distribution and persistence [105,107,108]. Rivers, stormwater, and runoff act as major hydrological arteries that transport MNPs from inland and urban environments toward coastal and marine ecosystems, where they accumulate in sediments and biota [106,122]. Several continental-scale syntheses indicate that concentrations in inland waters and stormwater often exceed those reported in downstream estuaries, highlighting strong terrestrial to aquatic gradients and continuous inputs from land-based sources [106,122].
Terrestrial systems function both as long-term reservoirs and as active contributors to onward dispersion. Inputs arise from sewage sludge application, manure, tire wear particles, degraded plastic mulches, and atmospheric deposition, with particles persisting in soils, altering soil structure, and interacting with organisms in soil [122,123,124].
Airborne transport is now recognized as a central component of MNP dispersal, and a major source of xenobiotic exposure via inhalation in humans. MNPs have been detected in urban, suburban, rural, and remote regions, including mountainous and remote environments, confirming long-range atmospheric movement and deposition to land and water systems [105,106,125,126]. Indoor environments are repeatedly highlighted as significant exposure environments for humans because textile fibres and household plastics contribute substantially to indoor air and dust, which is particularly important for vulnerable populations spending prolonged time indoors [123,125,126].
Collectively, converging evidence indicates that MNPs form a pervasive environmental reservoir that links air, soil, freshwater, and marine compartments into a single interconnected exposure continuum [105,106,107,108,125].

3.2. Entry into Food Webs and One Health Links

Overall, MNPs enter aquatic food webs through the bioaccumulation documented from plankton to fish, seabirds, and marine mammals. Evidence indicates trophic transfer and retention within biological tissues, supporting concerns regarding long-term accumulation and biological impacts across species [107,123,124,127]. Parallel findings in terrestrial species demonstrate ingestion in livestock and wildlife, with species-specific vulnerability and physiological consequences [36,128,129].
Specifically, within aquatic ecosystems, fish and seafood occupy a pivotal position in the transfer of MNPs from the environment to higher trophic levels, including humans. MNPs have been widely documented in commercially relevant finfish, bivalves, crustaceans, and processed seafood products across diverse geographic regions [127,130,131,132,133]. Particle burdens vary substantially with feeding strategy and trophic position. Filter feeders such as mussels and oysters, as well as shrimp and small fish consumed whole, typically exhibit the highest levels of ingestion because gastrointestinal contents are retained in the edible fraction [130,131,132,133]. In contrast, for most larger finfish where viscera are removed prior to consumption, MNP levels in muscle tissue are generally lower, although contamination can still arise from post-harvest processing and packaging [131,132,134].
Risk evaluations by EFSA and subsequent reviews suggest that, under conservative assumptions, MNPs in seafood currently contribute a relatively minor proportion to overall exposure to plastic-associated additives and contaminants [133,135,136]. However, these assessments are limited by sparse data on particles smaller than 150 μm and on NPs, which may exhibit higher bioavailability. Moreover, MNPs present in seafood can act as vectors for co-occurring contaminants, including plastic additives, metals, hydrophobic organic chemicals, and microorganisms, raising concern for combined toxicological effects along aquatic food webs [37,127,130,131,132,137]. From a One Health perspective, contamination of marine food webs therefore represents a shared challenge linking environmental pollution, fish health, food safety, and human exposure.
Human exposure occurs primarily through ingestion and inhalation. Drinking water, seafood, salt, fruits, vegetables, and processed foods have been shown to contain MNPs, with estimated annual intakes in the tens of thousands of particles per person, although significant methodological uncertainty remains [123,124,138]. Importantly, detection of MNPs in human faeces, placenta, blood, lung and brain tissue, and other biological matrices confirms internal exposure and indicates the potential for bioaccumulation across the lifespan [107,124,139,140,141,142].
Within a One Health perspective, terrestrial domestic animals and companion animals are increasingly viewed as environmental sentinels because they share indoor air exposure, interact with contaminated soils and food chains, and may reflect exposure burdens relevant to human health (Figure 2). Their role in manure to soil to crop pathways is particularly important for agricultural exposure cycles and food security [124,134,141].

4. Internalization, Distribution, and Persistence

MNPs can enter the human body through ingestion and inhalation, and a fraction can cross epithelial barriers to reach systemic circulation. Although most exposures likely result in limited absorption, converging human, animal, and in vitro evidence indicates that a proportion of particles, particularly smaller MNPs, can be internalized, distributed to organs, and persist within different tissues for sustained periods. The extent to which these processes contribute to meaningful lifetime body burdens and interact with aging biology remains insufficiently characterized.

4.1. Absorption and Barrier Translocation

Ingestion and inhalation currently represent the most established exposure pathways in humans [141,143]. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicate that gastrointestinal absorption is generally low, yet not negligible. Multiple mechanisms permit barrier passage, including transcytosis in enterocytes, uptake by M-cells, persorption through epithelial discontinuities, and phagocytosis by immune cells, with efficiency strongly dependent on particle size, surface charge, and chemistry [141,144,145]. Advanced intestinal co-culture models support the capacity of NPs to cross via passive diffusion and endocytic routes, reinforcing biological plausibility for systemic entry [146].
The respiratory tract represents an additional relevant entry point, with inhalation being the main exposure route to these xenobiotics. Only particles below approximately 5 µm efficiently reach the lower lung, although the presence of larger particles in lung tissue suggests possible vascular entrapment after systemic redistribution rather than direct deposition [141]. Human studies reporting MNPs in lung tissue, sputum, blood, placenta, and brain confirm that barrier translocation occurs in real-world contexts [147,148,149,150]. Collectively, the available evidence supports the conclusion that while the majority of ingested or inhaled MNPs may be cleared through mucociliary or gastrointestinal mechanisms, a consistent fraction of particles can penetrate biological barriers and enter systemic circulation, particularly when they fall within the micro-to-nano size range [141,147,151].

4.2. Biodistribution, Persistence, and Accumulation in Aging

Experimental work in rodents demonstrates that absorbed particles do not remain confined to the entry site but distribute to multiple organs including the liver, kidney, gut, spleen, brain, and reproductive tissues, with smaller particles exhibiting broader distribution and higher tissue retention (Figure 3) [144,152,153]. Physiologically based toxicokinetic models in mice indicate that gastrointestinal absorption and faecal elimination dominate whole-body kinetics, while organ accumulation reflects size-dependent differences in binding and clearance, including reduced urinary elimination for smaller particles [23]. Model estimates indicate that nanoplastics and microplastics (1 to 10 μm) accumulate progressively in human tissues across the lifespan, reaching substantially higher levels in adults than in children. Specifically, cumulative intake is estimated at 8.32 × 103 particles per capita (90% CI, 7.08 × 102 to 1.91 × 106) or 6.4 ng per capita (90% CI, 0.1 to 2.31 × 103) by 18 years of age, whereas accumulation increases to 5.01 × 104 particles per capita (90% CI, 5.25 × 103 to 9.33 × 106) or 40.7 ng per capita (90% CI, 0.8 to 9.85 × 103) by 70 years of age, indicating a substantial age-dependent increase in retained particles in body tissues [154].
Human-directed toxicokinetic assessments propose that most ingested particles are excreted, but a systemically absorbed fraction can accumulate in hepatosplenic organs and potentially the brain, with clearance likely involving macrophage-mediated processes and reticuloendothelial sequestration [141,147,151]. Importantly, existing evidence suggests the possibility of incomplete clearance and long residence times. At the cellular scale, MNPs can be internalized via endocytosis and persist over cell divisions, providing a mechanistic basis for cellular bioaccumulation and potentially chronic intracellular exposure [148,149].
Current knowledge strongly indicates size-dependent fate characteristics. NPs show the greatest capacity for barrier crossing and widespread tissue access, including convincing evidence of central nervous system entry in animal models [144,151,153]. Smaller MNPs demonstrate systemic translocation with accumulation in major metabolic and immune organs and are often associated with more tissue-level alterations [23,153]. Larger MPs are more likely confined to the gastrointestinal tract or become physically trapped within vascular structures, resulting in far more limited systemic distribution [141,143].
The relevance of these processes for aging relies on two intertwined considerations. First, MNPs engage biological pathways linked to the hallmarks of aging [147,156,157]. Second, aging itself alters barrier integrity, immune clearance mechanisms, and physiological resilience. Age-associated increases in gut and lung permeability, reduced macrophage efficiency, and altered inflammatory tone could theoretically enhance absorption, systemic persistence, and downstream tissue vulnerability [144,147,158]. However, these implications remain largely inferential, and more research is required. There is a paucity of direct, age-stratified toxicokinetic data, and lifetime accumulation dynamics remain unclear.

5. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Relevant to Aging

MNPs engage several biological pathways that overlap with recognized hallmarks of aging, particularly oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired inter-organelle signalling, and cellular senescence (Figure 4) [156,159,160,161]. While the effects of MNP exposure induce these same pathways, clinical and causative evidence remains scarce, and more evidence is needed to explicitly confirm whether MNP exposure may lead to accelerated biological aging. To date, most mechanistic insights derive from mammalian cell systems and animal models, with limited longitudinal human data, yet the convergence between particle toxicity and aging biology is increasingly documented (Table 2) [156,159,162]. Altogether, however, these preliminary findings warrant the need to investigate how the effects of MNP exposure may affect the hallmarks of aging and accelerated biological aging in vivo.

5.1. Oxidative Stress and Redox Imbalance

Across a wide range of models, exposure to MNPs has been shown to induce oxidative stress [163,164]. Studies demonstrate increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), depletion of antioxidant systems including glutathione, superoxide dismutase, and catalase, and accumulation of lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage [156,159,161,162]. NPs are particularly potent, as they can enter mitochondria, impair electron transport chain function, cause membrane depolarization, and promote sustained oxidative stress [159,160,165]. Particle size, surface chemistry, and environmental aging modify these effects, with smaller, positively charged, and UV-aged particles presenting higher redox reactivity [153,161,162].
Aging organisms already exist in a state of weakened antioxidant capacity and heightened oxidative load; therefore this interaction provides strong mechanistic plausibility that chronic low-level exposure could intensify age-related redox imbalance, although robust long-term dose–response data in humans remain unavailable [46,156,159,165].

5.2. Inflammation and Immune Dysregulation

MNPs consistently activate innate immune signalling. Experimental work shows activation of NFκB, MAPK, and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways, with associated increases in cytokines such as TNFα, IL1β, IL6, and IL8 across gut, lung, liver, and immune cell systems [156,159,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173]. Macrophages and dendritic cells internalize particles and show ROS-dependent activation with phenotype shifts [170,172,174,175,176].
This chronic, low-grade immune activation parallels the biology of inflammaging, suggesting that persistent tissue retention of particles could theoretically reinforce inflammatory tone and contribute to immune dysregulation over time. To date, however, direct evidence linking these immune effects to human aging trajectories remains limited and largely inferential [26,156,165,177,178].

5.3. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Metabolic Impairment

Multiple studies indicate that NPs, and in some contexts, small MPs, reach mitochondria where they disrupt structure and function. Reported effects include cristae damage, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, ATP reduction, respiratory chain impairment, calcium imbalance, and excessive mitophagy [147,159,160,165,167,179]. Functional consequences include apoptosis, metabolic disturbance, insulin resistance in muscle systems, and neurodegeneration-like phenotypes in neuronal models [88,159,165,167,179].
Since mitochondrial decline is a central contributor to frailty, neurodegeneration, and metabolic disease in aging, these findings support a biologically plausible pathway through which environmental plastic exposure may exacerbate age-associated mitochondrial vulnerability [88,156,159,160,165].

5.4. Cellular Senescence and Altered Cell Communication

Experimental and review evidence indicates that MNPs can promote cellular senescence. Reported mechanisms include oxidative DNA injury, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired autophagy, activation of DNA damage responses, and p53-related signalling, together with secretion of cytokines consistent with senescence-associated secretory phenotype profiles [156,161,167]. Size-dependent and dosage-dependent mechanisms have been proposed, including ferroptosis and p53–Fosl1–Slc7a11 signalling for NPs, whereas MPs may drive metabolic reprogramming and inflammatory signalling involving YAP pathways [167].
Senescent cell accumulation contributes to tissue dysfunction and systemic inflammaging. Consequently, MNP-induced senescence represents a plausible contributor to accelerated biological aging. However, organism-level confirmation, particularly under environmentally relevant exposure scenarios, remains sparse and represents a major gap in the literature [156,161].
Table 2. Experimental evidence linking micro- and nanoplastics to aging mechanisms and hallmarks of aging.
Table 2. Experimental evidence linking micro- and nanoplastics to aging mechanisms and hallmarks of aging.
Study/ModelParticle Type & ExposureAging-Relevant Cell/Tissue TargetKey Cellular & Molecular MechanismsAging-Linked OutcomesCitations
Testis multi-omics, young vs. old micePS-NPs, chronic oral, 3 months in 3- and 17-month-old miceTestis, Leydig cellsAge-dependent disruption of RNA metabolism in young vs. DNA catabolism, collagen/ECM remodeling in old; downregulation of SR-BI and impaired steroidogenesis; fibrosis; altered SASP-related pathwaysPremature testicular aging in young; aggravated age-related testicular degeneration and sperm decline in old[168]
Colon toxicity, mice + intestinal epithelial cellsPS 100 nm vs. 10 µm, oral and in vitroIntestinal epitheliumNanoscale: endocytosis, ROS, iron overload, GSH depletion, GPX4 inhibition, p53–Fosl1-driven ferroptosis and immunogenic cell death. Microscale: mechanical membrane/cytoskeletal damage, YAP activation, metabolic shift from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis, inflammationChronic epithelial damage, inflammatory milieu, and metabolic reprogramming associated with tissue aging and cancer risk[167]
PS-NPs in polyps, microglia, micePS-NPs, in vitro and in vivoMicroglia, marine polyps, mouse brainROS increase, decreased CAT and T-AOC, increased MDA; MAPK pathway activation; microglial activation and apoptosis; neuroinflammationAnxiety-like behaviour and cognitive impairment in mice, consistent with accelerated brain aging phenotypes[180]
PET MPs in accelerated-senescence ratsPET 2–6 µm, 10 or 100 mg/kg, 2 months oralBrain, lens, retinaCognitive decline without major blood chemistry changes; progression of cataract and AMD-like retinopathy; mechanisms not fully dissected but linked to chronic exposureWorsened geriatric phenotypes in OXYS rats, suggesting increased rate of aging and age-related disease burden[181]
PP MPs in mouse colonPP 8 and 70 µm, 0.1–10 mg/mL, 28 days oralColonic epithelium, barrierOxidative stress (redox imbalance), tight-junction disruption, reduced mucus and ion transporter expression; TLR4/NF-κB activation; increased pro-apoptotic and pro-inflammatory proteins, elevated apoptosisLoss of barrier integrity, chronic inflammation and epithelial apoptosis—hallmarks of inflammaging in gut[182]
Weathered MPs in adult zebrafishNaturally weathered PE/PP MPs, 0.1–1 mg/L, 21 daysBrain and liver mitochondriaDecreased mitochondrial complexes II & IV in brain; liver mitochondrial respiration and membrane potential loss; increased SOD/CAT (ROS-induced ROS release)Anxiety-like behaviour and mitochondrial dysfunction, aligning with mitochondrial theory of aging[183]
PLA micro/nanoplastics in male micePLA MPs → NPs, chronic exposureTestis, sperm mitochondria, BTBPLA-NPs cross BTB; excessive mitochondrial ROS, structural damage, impaired mitochondrial function in testes and sperm; transcriptomic suppression of spermatogenesis genesReduced sperm quality and hormonal disruption; mitochondrial damage driving reproductive aging[81]
PS MPs/NPs in retinal cells and rat eyePS MPs vs. NPs, 48 h in RPE cells; intravitreal injection in ratsRetinal pigment epithelium, retinaNPs internalization → high ROS, mitochondrial fission (FIS1, Drp1), mitophagy (LC3B), ↑SOD2; retinal inflammation with ↑TNF-α, IL-1βMitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation in RPE, central mechanisms in age-related macular degeneration[184]
PS-NPs in zebrafishPS-NPs ~70 nm, chronic in adultsBrain, liver, gonadsTissue accumulation; oxidative stress and disturbed lipid/energy metabolism; altered neurotransmitters and circadian rhythmNeurobehavioral impairment and reproductive toxicity, consistent with systemic functional aging[185]
PS-NPs in PD mouse modelPS-NPs, 2 mg/kg q.o.d., 3 months, A53T α-syn miceGut barrier, microbiota, liver, brainGoblet-cell loss, epithelial apoptosis; dysbiosis (Desulfovibrio↑); >200 fecal metabolites altered; LPS and apoptosis pathways; liver inflammation; exacerbated neuroinflammation and α-syn aggregationAcceleration of Parkinson-like pathology via gut–liver–brain axis disruption and metabolic dysregulation[186]
MPs in female mice and offspringMPs 40 mg/kg/day, gestation + lactationOocytes, embryos, offspring germ cellsElevated ROS in oocytes/embryos; mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis; DNA damage and spindle/chromosome defects; altered actin and JunoReduced fertility, impaired offspring growth and oocyte quality—evidence of trans-generational reproductive aging[187]
Acute PS-MPs in young vs. old micePS 0.1 and 2 µm, 3 weeks in waterBrain, liver; age-stratifiedAge-dependent behavioural changes; altered immune markers in brain and liver (inflammation); in vitro cytotoxicity with perinuclear accumulationShort-term exposure induces inflammation and behavioural shifts differing by age, suggesting age-specific vulnerability[188]
Pre-puberty PS-NPs + cordycepinPS-NPs 80 nm, 3–12 mg/kg/day (PND 21–95)Testis, BTB, Sertoli cellsOxidative stress, BTB disruption (junction proteins↓), inflammation, apoptosis; transcriptomic enrichment of metabolism, lysosome, apoptosis, TLR4 signalling; cordycepin mitigates via TLR4 targetingLong-term reproductive impairment from early-life exposure; persistent barrier damage and oxidative stress compatible with accelerated gonadal aging[189]
PS-MPs in chicken kidneyPS-MPs 1–100 mg/L, 6 weeksRenal mitochondria, tubular cellsAltered mitochondrial dynamics (MFN1/2, OPA1, Drp1), structural damage; oxidative stress (SOD, CAT, MDA, GSH, T-AOC changes); NF-κB activation; necroptosis via RIP1/RIP3/MLKLInflammation-driven renal degeneration with necroptosis, mapping onto cell-death mechanisms seen in age-related kidney disease[164]
UV-aged PS-MPs, C. elegansVirgin vs. aged PS-MPs, 0.1–100 µg/L, 10 dDopaminergic, glutamatergic, serotonergic neuronsGreater neurodegeneration with aged MPs; altered glutamate, serotonin, dopamine levels; dysregulated neurotransmission genes (eat-4, dat-1, tph-1)Impaired locomotion and neurotransmission, paralleling age-related decline and neurodegeneration[190]
Aged PS-MPs, zebrafish early lifePristine vs. UV-aged PS, 0.1–100 µg/LEmbryo/larval mitochondriaAged MPs → higher ROS, DNA damage, ↓mitochondrial membrane potential, cyt c release; caspase-3/9 activation; transcriptional changes in oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis genesDevelopmental defects and mitochondrial apoptosis, pointing to early-life programming of aging pathways[163]
PS-NPs, dopaminergic neurons & micePS-NPs 50 nm, 0.5–500 µg/mL in vitro; 250 mg/kg/d, 28 d in miceDopaminergic neurons, mitochondriaNP accumulation in mitochondria; complex I interference; ↓membrane potential, ↓ATP, impaired respiration; AMPK/ULK1-driven excessive mitophagy; ROS-independent cytotoxicity; melatonin rescuesPD-like neurodegeneration and motor deficits via maladaptive mitophagy, a central mechanism in brain aging[179]
PE-MPs in human discs and modelsEnvironmental PE-MPs; human disc samples, mouse & cell modelsNucleus pulposus cellsMPs detected in human intervertebral discs; in models, TLR4/NOX2 activation → ROS overproduction, oxidative stress, nucleus pulposus cell senescence; TLR4/NOX2 inhibition reverses effectsDisc degeneration through cellular senescence, directly linking MPs to a hallmark of aging[191]
PS MPs and aging gut microbiomePS MPs, aged miceGut microbiota and fecal metabolomeLoss of beneficial taxa, rise in potentially harmful bacteria; increased metabolites linked to stress and altered host metabolism (e.g., alanine, serine, tryptophan, thymine, methionine, benzoic acid)Exacerbated gut dysbiosis and aging-associated metabolic signatures, implying higher risk of age-related disease[192]
MPs ± DEHP in mouse liverMPs, DEHP, MPs + DEHPLiverAntioxidant system impairment; hepatic apoptosis and inflammation; transcriptomic/metabolomic disruption of carbohydrate, amino acid, lipid and purine metabolism; PI3K/AKT activation; induction of hepatocarcinogenesis-related genesMetabolic dysfunction, chronic inflammation and pro-tumorigenic signalling, overlapping strongly with hepatic aging pathways[193]
↑, increase; ↓, decrease; MP, microplastic; NP, nanoplastic; PS, polystyrene; PET, polyethylene terephthalate; PP, polypropylene; PE, polyethylene; PLA, polylactic acid; ECM, extracellular matrix; SASP, senescence-associated secretory phenotype; SR-BI, scavenger receptor class B type I; ROS, reactive oxygen species; GSH, glutathione; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; MDA, malondialdehyde; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; BTB, blood–testis barrier; YAP, Yes-associated protein; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-1β, interleukin 1 beta; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MFN1/2, mitofusin 1/2; OPA1, optic atrophy 1; Drp1, dynamin-related protein 1; RIP1/3, receptor-interacting protein kinase 1/3; MLKL, mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; ULK1, unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1; PD, Parkinson’s disease; BTB, blood–testis barrier.
Overall, mechanistic evidence indicates that MNPs may activate biological pathways central to aging, including oxidative stress, inflammation, mitochondrial injury, and senescence signalling. This convergence supports biological plausibility that lifelong exposure could interact with aging biology and potentially influence healthspan. However, most studies rely on short-term and relatively high-dose exposures. Determining the relevance of chronic, low-dose environmental exposure for aging outcomes will require aging-focused experimental systems, longitudinal human studies, and integration within life-course exposomics frameworks.

6. One Health Implications of Micro- and Nanoplastics for Aging Populations

Within a One Health framework, MNPs should be interpreted not merely as ubiquitous environmental contaminants, low-dose stressors that interact with biological aging processes across species. Their relevance for aging populations arises from three converging features: lifelong exposure beginning early in development, physical persistence with limited biodegradation, and mechanistic overlap with conserved pathways that drive age-related functional decline (Figure 5) [55,91]. These characteristics distinguish MNPs from many classical environmental toxicants and justify their consideration within aging and longevity research frameworks to ensure improved healthspan and rehabilitation in older adults.

6.1. Ecosystem Health, Animal Sentinels, and Conserved Aging Pathways

MNP contamination affects all major environmental compartments. From a One Health and aging perspective, the critical observation is the common biological responses to MNP exposure across taxa. Laboratory and field studies in aquatic and terrestrial organisms consistently report oxidative stress, immune dysregulation, altered lipid and energy metabolism, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired reproduction following chronic exposure [25,194,195]. These pathways overlap substantially with hallmarks of aging, including mitochondrial dysfunction, loss of proteostasis, altered intercellular communication, and stem cell exhaustion [91].
Quantitatively, experimental studies in fish, mollusks, and rodents often report increased reactive oxygen species levels ranging from 20 to 200 percent above controls, accompanied by significant reductions in antioxidant enzyme activity and ATP production, depending on particle size and exposure duration [25,156]. While these exposure levels exceed current environmental estimates, the directionality and consistency of responses support the notion that MNPs activate conserved stress pathways rather than species-specific toxic effects.
From a surveillance standpoint, wildlife and domestic animals exposed to chronic environmental contamination can therefore function as sentinels showing the effects of cumulative biological stress due to MNPs. Observations of reduced reproductive fitness, impaired immune competence, and altered metabolic profiles in animal populations may provide early warnings of processes that, under prolonged exposure and in the context of declining resilience, could influence human aging trajectories.

6.2. Aging as a Modifier of Susceptibility in Humans

Aging may fundamentally modify susceptibility to exposure and subsequent internalisation to MNPs. Age-related changes in epithelial barrier integrity, including increased intestinal permeability and reduced mucociliary clearance, may enhance internalization of inhaled or ingested particles [20,196]. Experimental and clinical studies indicate that intestinal permeability can increase in older adults, while immune surveillance and phagocytic capacity decline progressively with age, potentially impairing clearance of persistent particles.
Immunosenescence may further promote persistence of internalized MNPs and sustain low-grade inflammatory signalling [196]. These processes occur against a background of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, although it is still no clear understanding of how this may affect MNP absorption rates. Furthermore, older adults recovering from disease through rehabilitation already face limited physiological reserve, and chronic exposure to MNPs may further hinder successful rehabilitation and healthspan maintenance by sustaining inflammatory and metabolic stress, underscoring the need to explicitly consider these populations in MNP research.
Importantly, aging populations experience cumulative exposure to multiple environmental stressors. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5), for example, has been associated with increased mortality and accelerated biological aging, with long-term exposure above 10 µg/m3 linked to measurable reductions in life expectancy [197]. Many of the molecular pathways activated by PM2.5 overlap with those reported for MNPs, including oxidative stress, inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Within this broader exposomic context, MNPs should be viewed as incremental contributors to physiological burden rather than dominant drivers of pathology.

6.3. Public Health, Prevention, and Healthy Aging Frameworks

At the population level, the potential relevance of MNPs for aging emphasizes the importance of preventive environmental health strategies. Although current evidence does not support age-specific exposure thresholds or clinical guidelines, the mechanistic convergence between MNP-induced effects and hallmarks of aging supports their inclusion within healthy aging and longevity research agendas [91].
Primary prevention strategies include reduction of plastic production, more effective recycling, and addressing of environmental pollution. These measures align protection of human health with preservation of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Secondary prevention approaches may involve integration of MNP exposure metrics into exposomic and geroscience cohorts, enabling longitudinal evaluation of associations with biomarkers of biological aging, including epigenetic clocks, chronic inflammation profiles, mitochondrial function, and functional decline [198].
Taken together, these considerations position MNPs as components of a shared ecological and biological context that may modulate aging trajectories across species. A One Health approach therefore provides a scientifically coherent framework for addressing environmental sustainability, animal health, and human healthy aging in an increasingly plastic-dependent world.

7. Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions

Substantial uncertainty still limits our ability to link lifelong MNP exposure to aging trajectories and chronic health outcomes, despite increasing biological plausibility. Major gaps exist across exposure science, analytical chemistry, toxicology, and population research.

7.1. Limitations in MNP Research and Methodological Challenges in Nanoplastic Detection

Limitations in MNP research arise not only from analytical constraints but also from experimental design. Conflicting results frequently reflect uncontrolled variation in particle type, size, aging, dose, and exposure matrix, which are rarely standardized across studies [199,200,201]. A major bias is the extensive use of monodisperse spherical polystyrene as a model plastic, despite its poor representativeness of heterogeneous environmental polymers, limiting extrapolation to real exposure scenarios [202,203].
Many studies also rely on supra-environmental concentrations, short exposures, and simplified endpoints such as cytotoxicity or oxidative stress, which can overestimate hazard and reduce comparability [201,204,205]. Inconsistent quality control and reporting of particle characterization and experimental conditions further limits reproducibility and risk assessment [8,206]. Together, these issues hinder generalization of findings from idealized nanoplastics to complex environmental mixtures.
Detection and quantification of NPs in environmental and biological samples remains one of the most significant barriers. Spectroscopic approaches such as micro-FTIR and Raman spectroscopy progressively lose discriminatory capability below 1 µm, while thermal analytical platforms including pyrolysis-GC/MS and TED-GC/MS provide polymer mass but do not resolve particle number, morphology, or surface chemistry, especially in complex matrices such as blood or tissues [207,208,209,210,211,212,213]. Reported detections often vary widely across studies, and there is credible concern regarding contamination and false positives, particularly when detection limits may approach or exceed expected environmental exposure levels [143,212,213]. Many studies still lack harmonized quality assurance protocols, including blanks, recovery efficiencies, and standardized reporting units, which limits cross-study comparison and risk assessment frameworks [207,211,212,213]. Ongoing work is exploring enhanced Raman detection, SERS, advanced imaging mass spectrometry, and tracer-labelled plastics to improve traceability across the lifespan [77,207,213]. Parallel development of standardized internal body burden metrics in blood, brain, and other organs is essential to characterize lifetime accumulation and exposure variability [139,140,212,214,215].

7.2. Need for Aging-Focused Experimental and Clinical Models

Most toxicological knowledge is derived from experiments using young animals, short exposures, or simplified polystyrene spheres at concentrations that often exceed realistic human levels [25,37,144,204]. Experimental work rarely incorporates aging physiology, despite clear mechanistic overlaps between MNP toxicity and processes such as inflammaging, mitochondrial decline, and cellular senescence [144,156,204]. There is a strong need for aged animal models, disease-susceptible organisms, senescent cell systems, and aged human organoid platforms. Lifespan-oriented study designs spanning prenatal development to late life, combined exposures with sorbed pollutants or microbial biofilms, and environmentally realistic particle sizes and concentrations, and polymer compositions will be essential for relevance to human aging biology [156,204,216].

7.3. Longitudinal, One Health, and Exposomics Approaches

Human evidence remains limited to small or cross-sectional biomonitoring studies and lacks long-term epidemiological designs capable of assessing frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive decline, or mortality outcomes across decades [139,143,212,214]. Older adults undergoing rehabilitation often present with reduced physiological reserve and multiple comorbidities, underscoring the need for MNP research to explicitly consider aging populations whose compromised resilience may amplify the functional consequences of chronic environmental exposures. There are few integrative One Health studies tracing particles from environmental reservoirs into food webs and ultimately to human internal dose and biological effect [25,217]. Brain accumulation and potential links to neurodegenerative processes and dementia have emerged as an important research frontier following the recent detection of MPs in human brain tissue, but mechanistic and epidemiological understanding remains limited [139,218]. Integration of exposomics, multi-omics biomarkers of aging, exposure–response modelling, and advanced analytics represents a widely recognized path forward to move beyond association toward causal inference [25,156,198,217].

7.4. Future Priorities

Critical next steps include: (1) development and harmonization of high-resolution NP detection with rigorous quality assurance and control; (2) implementation of aging-relevant, disease-sensitive in vitro and in vivo models at environmentally realistic doses; and (3) integration of exposomics and multi-omics platforms to elucidate mechanistic pathways linking MNP exposure to aging and chronic disease [139,156,198,204,217,219]. Additionally, future studies should also incorporate detailed kinetic analyses of adsorption–desorption processes of other pollutants, such as heavy metals, carried by MNPs and intracellular pollutant release, including time-resolved investigations of how particle aging or photo-oxidation alters cargo dynamics and toxicity under realistic exposure conditions [3,43,218,220].

8. Conclusions

MNPs are persistent components of the exposome, resulting in continuous exposure across the lifespan. Experimental evidence indicates that these particles engage biological pathways central to aging, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and altered intercellular communication [91]. Aging may increase vulnerability through declining barrier integrity, immune surveillance, and clearance capacity, positioning MNPs as potential modifiers of biological aging within a broader exposomic context [55,221]. Addressing their potential impact requires a One Health approach integrating environmental prevention, ecosystem protection, and aging-focused exposomics research to support healthy aging.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B., C.M. and E.T.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, E.T.; visualization, A.B. and C.M.; supervision, E.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health [Ricerca corrente].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Plastic Free Onlus, as well as Cino and Giuse Cunial for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Thompson, R.C.; Courtene-Jones, W.; Boucher, J.; Pahl, S.; Raubenheimer, K.; Koelmans, A.A. Twenty Years of Microplastic Pollution Research—What Have We Learned? Science 2024, 386, eadl2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wright, S.; Cassee, F.R.; Erdely, A.; Campen, M.J. Micro- and Nanoplastics Concepts for Particle and Fibre Toxicologists. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2024, 21, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, N.; Shi, H.; Li, X.; Gao, C.-Z.; Liu, R. Combined Toxicity of Micro/Nanoplastics Loaded with Environmental Pollutants to Organisms and Cells: Role, Effects, and Mechanism. Environ. Int. 2022, 171, 107711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rafa, N.; Ahmed, B.; Zohora, F.; Bakya, J.; Ahmed, S.; Ahmed, S.F.; Mofijur, M.; Chowdhury, A.; Almomani, F. Microplastics as Carriers of Toxic Pollutants: Source, Transport, and Toxicological Effects. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 343, 123190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rajendran, D.; Chandrasekaran, N. Journey of Micronanoplastics with Blood Components. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 31435–31459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, Z.; Deloid, G.; Zarbl, H.; Baw, J.; Demokritou, P. Micro- and Nanoplastics (MNPs) and Their Potential Toxicological Outcomes: State of Science, Knowledge Gaps and Research Needs. NanoImpact 2023, 32, 100481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Tang, W.; Wang, X.; Dong, Q.; Liu, G.; Guo, Y.; Liang, Y.; Ding, X.; Yin, Y.; et al. Water-Extractable Metals as Indicators of Wheat Metal Accumulation: Insights from Cd, Pb, Mn, Cu, and Zn. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 479, 135745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ivleva, N.P. Chemical Analysis of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Challenges, Advanced Methods, and Perspectives. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 11886–11936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Koelmans, A.A.; Gebreyohanes Belay, B.M.; Mintenig, S.M.; Mohamed Nor, N.H.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P.E.; De Ruijter, V.N. Towards a Rational and Efficient Risk Assessment for Microplastics. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 165, 117142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Du, J.; Qiu, L.; Zhou, Q.; Jin, M.; Wu, W. Microplastics as Vectors for Environmental Contaminants in the Food Chain: Assessing the Combined Toxicological Effects and Bioavailability. Toxicol. Lett. 2025, 413, 111734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Destoumieux-Garzón, D.; Mavingui, P.; Boetsch, G.; Boissier, J.; Darriet, F.; Duboz, P.; Fritsch, C.; Giraudoux, P.; Le Roux, F.; Morand, S.; et al. The One Health Concept: 10 Years Old and a Long Road Ahead. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mackenzie, J.S.; Jeggo, M. The One Health Approach-Why Is It So Important? Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 4, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gibbs, E.P.J. The Evolution of One Health: A Decade of Progress and Challenges for the Future. Vet. Rec. 2014, 174, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arif, Y.; Mir, A.R.; Zieliński, P.; Hayat, S.; Bajguz, A. Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Source, Behavior, Remediation, and Multi-Level Environmental Impact. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 356, 120618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, F.; Gao, C.; Chan, A.W.H.; Topping, D.O.; Zhang, H.; Li, W.; Coe, H.; Liu, X.; Ching, J.; Zheng, Z. A Review of Atmospheric Micro/Nanoplastics: Insights into Source and Fate for Modelling Studies. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2025, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mohsen, M.; Gündoğdu, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, C. Impact of Micro and Nanoplastics on Aquaculture Animals: A Systematic Review. Aquac. Int. 2025, 33, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Leslie, H.A.; Van Velzen, M.J.M.; Brandsma, S.H.; Vethaak, A.D.; Garcia-Vallejo, J.J.; Lamoree, M.H. Discovery and Quantification of Plastic Particle Pollution in Human Blood. Environ. Int. 2022, 163, 107199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Roslan, N.S.; Lee, Y.Y.; Ibrahim, Y.S.; Tuan Anuar, S.; Yusof, K.M.K.K.; Lai, L.A.; Brentnall, T. Detection of Microplastics in Human Tissues and Organs: A Scoping Review. J. Glob. Health 2024, 14, 04179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, W.; Deng, X.-J.; Zhang, J.; Qi, L.; Zhao, X.-Q.; Zhang, P.-Y. Assessment of Quality Control Measures in the Monitoring of Microplastic: A Critical Review. Environ. Pollut. Bioavailab. 2023, 35, 2203349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pandics, T.; Major, D.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Szarvas, Z.; Peterfi, A.; Mukli, P.; Gulej, R.; Ungvari, A.; Fekete, M.; Tompa, A.; et al. Exposome and Unhealthy Aging: Environmental Drivers from Air Pollution to Occupational Exposures. GeroScience 2023, 45, 3381–3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tian, W.; Cao, K.; Feng, Q. The Impact of Environmental Exposure on the Health of Older Adults: A Review from the GIScience Perspective. Trans. GIS 2025, 29, e70056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dewika, M.; Markandan, K.; Irfan, N.A.; Mohd Abdah, M.A.A.; Ruwaida, J.N.; Sara, Y.Y.; Khalid, M. Review of Microplastics in the Indoor Environment: Distribution, Human Exposure and Potential Health Impacts. Chemosphere 2023, 324, 138270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, C.-Y.; Kamineni, V.; Lin, Z. A Physiologically Based Toxicokinetic Model for Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Mice after Oral Exposure and Its Implications for Human Dietary Exposure Assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 135922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. López-Otín, C.; Blasco, M.A.; Partridge, L.; Serrano, M.; Kroemer, G. The Hallmarks of Aging. Cell 2013, 153, 1194–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sangkham, S.; Faikhaw, O.; Munkong, N.; Sakunkoo, P.; Arunlertaree, C.; Chavali, M.; Mousazadeh, M.; Tiwari, A. A Review on Microplastics and Nanoplastics in the Environment: Their Occurrence, Exposure Routes, Toxic Studies, and Potential Effects on Human Health. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 181, 113832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shiwakoti, S.; Dhakal, B.; Ok, Y.; Gong, D.-S.; Ko, J.-Y.; Kim, P.-G.; Oak, M.-H. Nanoplastics: An Emerging Environmental Concern in Age-Related Diseases. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 384, 126972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, D.; Kim, S.A.; Nam, S.-H.; Kwak, J.I.; Kim, L.; Lee, T.-Y.; Kim, H.; An, S.; An, Y.-J. Microplastic Ingestion in Aquatic and Soil Biota: A Comprehensive Review of Laboratory Studies on Edible Size and Intake Pattern. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 200, 116056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nicholson, K.; Liu, W.; Fitzpatrick, D.; Hardacre, K.A.; Roberts, S.; Salerno, J.; Stranges, S.; Fortin, M.; Mangin, D. Prevalence of Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy Among Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024, 5, e287–e296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Prattichizzo, F.; Ceriello, A.; Pellegrini, V.; La Grotta, R.; Graciotti, L.; Olivieri, F.; Paolisso, P.; D’Agostino, B.; Iovino, P.; Balestrieri, M.L.; et al. Micro-Nanoplastics and Cardiovascular Diseases: Evidence and Perspectives. Eur. Heart J. 2024, 45, 4099–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Soltani, N.S.; Taylor, M.P.; Wilson, S.P. International Quantification of Microplastics in Indoor Dust: Prevalence, Exposure and Risk Assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 312, 119957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ageel, H.K.; Harrad, S.; Abdallah, M.A.-E. Microplastics in Settled Indoor Dust: Implications for Human Exposure. Emerg. Contam. 2025, 11, 100506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kong, L.; Li, S.; Fu, Y.; Cai, Q.; Zhai, Z.; Liang, J.; Ma, T. Microplastics/Nanoplastics Contribute to Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Mitochondrial Dysfunction as a Crucial Role. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2025, 199, 115355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pitt, S.J.; Gunn, A. The One Health Concept. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2024, 81, 12366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Farrelly, C. The Geroscience Perspective on One Health. BioScience 2025, biaf080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chandra Mouli, S.; Lozada, C.; Dong, W.; Nasir, K.; Ganatra, S.; Osi, K.; Rajagopalan, S.; Fischer, J.; Maddock, J.E.; Al-Kindi, S. Green One Health Cardiology. JACC Adv. 2025, 4, 102368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jeong, E.; Lee, J.-Y.; Redwan, M. Animal Exposure to Microplastics and Health Effects: A Review. Emerg. Contam. 2024, 10, 100369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, A.; Qadeer, A.; Wajid, A.; Ullah, Q.; Rahman, S.U.; Ullah, K.; Safi, S.Z.; Ticha, L.; Skalickova, S.; Chilala, P.; et al. Microplastics in Animal Nutrition: Occurrence, Spread, and Hazard in Animals. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 17, 101258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Scieszka, D.; Bolt, A.M.; McCormick, M.A.; Brigman, J.L.; Campen, M.J. Aging, Longevity, and the Role of Environmental Stressors: A Focus on Wildfire Smoke and Air Quality. Front. Toxicol. 2023, 5, 1267667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ottinger, M.A.; Grace, J.K.; Maness, T.J. Global Challenges in Aging: Insights from Comparative Biology and One Health. Front. Toxicol. 2024, 6, 1381178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, X.; Lu, B.; Liu, H.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y. Ecotoxicological Impacts of Microplastics to Gut Microbiota: Response Mechanism, Challenges and Environmental Sustainability-A Review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 302, 118748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jansen, M.A.K.; Andrady, A.L.; Bornman, J.F.; Aucamp, P.J.; Bais, A.F.; Banaszak, A.T.; Barnes, P.W.; Bernhard, G.H.; Bruckman, L.S.; Busquets, R.; et al. Plastics in the Environment in the Context of UV Radiation, Climate Change and the Montreal Protocol: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2023. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2024, 23, 629–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Osman, A.I.; Hosny, M.; Eltaweil, A.S.; Omar, S.; Elgarahy, A.M.; Farghali, M.; Yap, P.-S.; Wu, Y.-S.; Nagandran, S.; Batumalaie, K.; et al. Microplastic Sources, Formation, Toxicity and Remediation: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023, 21, 2129–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, Y.; Ou, Q.; Van Der Hoek, J.P.; Liu, G.; Lompe, K.M. Photo-Oxidation of Micro- and Nanoplastics: Physical, Chemical, and Biological Effects in Environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 991–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ventura, E.; Marín, A.; Gámez-Pérez, J.; Cabedo, L. Recent Advances in the Relationships Between Biofilms and Microplastics in Natural Environments. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rose, P.K.; Yadav, S.; Kataria, N.; Khoo, K.S. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in the Terrestrial Food Chain: Uptake, Translocation, Trophic Transfer, Ecotoxicology, and Human Health Risk. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 167, 117249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dal Yöntem, F.; Aydoğan Ahbab, M. Mitochondria as a Target of Micro- and Nanoplastic Toxicity. Camb. Prism. Plast. 2024, 2, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vanetti, C.; Broggiato, M.; Pezzana, S.; Clerici, M.; Fenizia, C. Effects of Microplastics on the Immune System: How Much Should We Worry? Immunol. Lett. 2025, 272, 106976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peterson, J.R.; Howell, B.M.; Hahn, M.B. Utilizing the “One Health” Model to Study Human Aging in Urban Environments. Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2022, 8, 23337214221116946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bastante-Rabadán, M.; Boltes, K. Mixtures of Micro and Nanoplastics and Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Environment: What We Know About Their Toxicological Effects. Toxics 2024, 12, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vogel, A.; Tentschert, J.; Pieters, R.; Bennet, F.; Dirven, H.; Van Den Berg, A.; Lenssen, E.; Rietdijk, M.; Broßell, D.; Haase, A. Towards a Risk Assessment Framework for Micro- and Nanoplastic Particles for Human Health. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2024, 21, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Winkler, A.S.; Brux, C.M.; Carabin, H.; Das Neves, C.G.; Häsler, B.; Zinsstag, J.; Fèvre, E.M.; Okello, A.; Laing, G.; Harrison, W.E.; et al. The Lancet One Health Commission: Harnessing Our Interconnectedness for Equitable, Sustainable, and Healthy Socioecological Systems. Lancet 2025, 406, 501–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shao, K.; Zou, R.; Zhang, Z.; Mandemaker, L.D.B.; Timbie, S.; Smith, R.D.; Durkin, A.M.; Dusza, H.M.; Meirer, F.; Weckhuysen, B.M.; et al. Advancements in Assays for Micro- and Nanoplastic Detection: Paving the Way for Biomonitoring and Exposomics Studies. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2025, 65, 567–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Choi, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, M.-K.; Yu, E.-S.; Ryu, Y.-S. Challenges and Recent Analytical Advances in Micro/Nanoplastic Detection. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 8846–8854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Santos, F.A.; Andre, R.S.; Alvarenga, A.D.; Alves, A.L.M.M.; Correa, D.S. Micro- and Nanoplastics in the Environment: A Comprehensive Review on Detection Techniques. Environ. Sci. Nano 2025, 12, 3442–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Koelmans, A.A.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P.E.; Nor, N.H.M.; De Ruijter, V.N.; Mintenig, S.M.; Kooi, M. Risk Assessment of Microplastic Particles. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Conway, J.; De Jong, E.N.; White, A.J.; Dugan, B.; Rees, N.P.; Parnell, S.M.; Lamberte, L.E.; Sharma-Oates, A.; Sullivan, J.; Mauro, C.; et al. Age-related Loss of Intestinal Barrier Integrity Plays an Integral Role in Thymic Involution and T Cell Ageing. Aging Cell 2025, 24, e14401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Beggel, S.; Kalis, E.J.J.; Geist, J. Towards Harmonized Ecotoxicological Effect Assessment of Micro- and Nanoplastics in Aquatic Systems. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 366, 125504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Prata, J.C.; Padrão, J.; Khan, M.T.; Walker, T.R. Do’s and Don’ts of Microplastic Research: A Comprehensive Guide. Water Emerg. Contam. Nanoplast. 2024, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rani-Borges, B.; Ando, R.A. How Small a Nanoplastic Can Be? A Discussion on the Size of This Ubiquitous Pollutant. Camb. Prism. Plast. 2024, 2, e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pradel, A.; Catrouillet, C.; Gigault, J. The Environmental Fate of Nanoplastics: What We Know and What We Need to Know About Aggregation. NanoImpact 2023, 29, 100453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Abdolahpur Monikh, F.; Quik, J.T.K.; Wiesner, M.R.; Tapparo, A.; Pastore, P.; Grossart, H.-P.; Akkanen, J.; Kortet, R.; Kukkonen, J.V.K. Importance of Attachment Efficiency in Determining the Fate of PS and PVC Nanoplastic Heteroaggregation with Natural Colloids Using a Multimedia Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 4674–4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ji, Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Yan, B.; Xiao, L.; et al. Realistic Nanoplastics Induced Pulmonary Damage via the Crosstalk of Ferritinophagy and Mitochondrial Dysfunction. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 16790–16807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, Z.; He, H.; Zhai, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wang, W. Microplastic Photoaging: A Critical Review on Occurrence, Influence Factors, Mechanism and Potential Effect. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 464, 142783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, W.; Chen, Q.; Walker, T.R. Key Methodological Priorities for Establishing a Microplastics Detection Laboratory. J. Hazard. Mater. Plast. 2025, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Song, J.; Wang, C.; Li, G. Defining Primary and Secondary Microplastics: A Connotation Analysis. ACS EST Water 2024, 4, 2330–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kukkola, A.; Chetwynd, A.J.; Krause, S.; Lynch, I. Beyond Microbeads: Examining the Role of Cosmetics in Microplastic Pollution and Spotlighting Unanswered Questions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 476, 135053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhou, Y.; Ashokkumar, V.; Amobonye, A.; Bhattacharjee, G.; Sirohi, R.; Singh, V.; Flora, G.; Kumar, V.; Pillai, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Current Research Trends on Cosmetic Microplastic Pollution and Its Impacts on the Ecosystem: A Review. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 320, 121106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Folbert, M.; Stoorvogel, J.; Löhr, A. Plastic Pellet Spills and Leakages during Maritime Transportation: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Understand the Complex Causal Pathways. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2025, 218, 118194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Diana, Z.T.; Chen, Y.; Rochman, C.M. Paint: A Ubiquitous yet Disregarded Piece of the Microplastics Puzzle. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2025, 44, 26–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Akyildiz, S.H.; Fiore, S.; Bruno, M.; Sezgin, H.; Yalcin-Enis, I.; Yalcin, B.; Bellopede, R. Release of Microplastic Fibers from Synthetic Textiles During Household Washing. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 357, 124455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hernandez, L.M.; Howarth-Forster, L.; Sørensen, L.; Booth, A.M.; Vidal, A.; Tufenkji, N.; Sempéré, R.; Schmidt, N. UV-Degradation Is a Key Driver of the Fate and Impacts of Marine Plastics. How Can Laboratory Experiments Be Designed to Effectively Inform Risk Assessment? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2025, 219, 118271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gao, Y.; Gao, W.; Liu, Y.; Zou, D.; Li, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zhao, J. A Comprehensive Review of Microplastic Aging: Laboratory Simulations, Physicochemical Properties, Adsorption Mechanisms, and Environmental Impacts. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 957, 177427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bridson, J.H.; Masterton, H.; Theobald, B.; Risani, R.; Doake, F.; Wallbank, J.A.; Maday, S.D.M.; Lear, G.; Abbel, R.; Smith, D.A.; et al. Leaching and Transformation of Chemical Additives from Weathered Plastic Deployed in the Marine Environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 198, 115810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wu, X.; He, F.; Xu, X.; Wu, L.; Rong, J.; Lin, S. Environmental Health and Safety Implications of the Interplay Between Microplastics and the Residing Biofilm. Environ. Health 2025, 3, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gouda, M.Z.; Xu, E.G.; Ateia, M. Why Pristine, Aged, and Real-World Microplastics Are All Essential for Environmental Research. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2026, 60, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vasse, G.; Melgert, B. Microplastic and Plastic Pollution: Impact on Respiratory Disease and Health. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2024, 33, 230226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ompala, C.; Renault, J.-P.; Taché, O.; Cournède, É.; Devineau, S.; Chivas-Joly, C. Stability and Dispersibility of Microplastics in Experimental Exposure Medium and Their Dimensional Characterization by SMLS, SAXS, Raman Microscopy, and SEM. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 469, 134083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, H.; Bai, L.; Liang, S.; Chen, X.; Gu, X.; Wang, C.; Gu, C. The Wheel of Time: The Environmental Dance of Aged Micro- and Nanoplastics and Their Biological Resonance. Eco-Environ. Health 2025, 4, 100138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Boháčková, J.; Cajthaml, T. Contribution of Chemical Toxicity to the Overall Toxicity of Microplastic Particles: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 957, 177611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Binda, G.; Kalčíková, G.; Allan, I.J.; Hurley, R.; Rødland, E.; Spanu, D.; Nizzetto, L. Microplastic Aging Processes: Environmental Relevance and Analytical Implications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 172, 117566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, Q.; Fang, Z.; Wang, P.; Qian, Z.; Yang, Y.; Ran, L.; Zheng, J.; Tang, Y.; Cui, X.; Li, Y.-Y.; et al. Polylactic Acid Micro/Nanoplastic Exposure Induces Male Reproductive Toxicity by Disrupting Spermatogenesis and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Mice. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 5589–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, X.; Xia, M.; Su, X.; Yuan, P.; Li, X.; Zhou, C.; Wan, Z.; Zou, W. Photolytic Degradation Elevated the Toxicity of Polylactic Acid Microplastics to Developing Zebrafish by Triggering Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Apoptosis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 413, 125321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Scalia, F.; Capparucci, F.; Amico, M.; Marino, M.; Lamparelli, E.; Longhitano, L.; Giallongo, S.; Falleti, R.; Rappa, F.; Iaria, C.; et al. Toxic Effects of Biodegradable Polylactic Acid Nanoplastics on Developing Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 38145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shao, Y.; Hua, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, D. Comparison of Reproductive Toxicity Between Pristine and Aged Polylactic Acid Microplastics in Caenorhabditis Elegans. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 466, 133545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wu, J.; Shao, Y.; Hua, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, D. Photo-Aged Polylactic Acid Microplastics Causes Severe Transgenerational Decline in Reproductive Capacity in C. elegans: Insight into Activation of DNA Damage Checkpoints Affected by Multiple Germline Histone Methyltransferases. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 382, 126697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Peng, Y.; Lu, J.; Fan, L.; Dong, W.; Jiang, M. Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion of Two Different Sources of Biodegradable Microplastics and the Influence on Gut Microbiota. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2024, 185, 114474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wen, L.; Hu, Q.; Lv, Y.; Ding, W.; Yin, T.; Mao, H.; Wang, T. Environmental Release Behavior, Cell Toxicity and Intracellular Distribution of Novel Biodegradable Plastic Materials. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 367, 125554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tang, K.H.D.; Li, R.; Li, Z.; Wang, D. Health Risk of Human Exposure to Microplastics: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 1155–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Santoro, A.; Marino, M.; Vandenberg, L.; Szychlinska, M.; Lamparelli, E.; Scalia, F.; Della Rocca, N.; D’Auria, R.; Pastorino, G.; Della Porta, G.; et al. PLASTAMINATION: Outcomes on the Central Nervous System and Reproduction. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2024, 22, 1870–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Alaraby, M.; Abass, D.; Farré, M.; Hernández, A.; Marcos, R. Are Bioplastics Safe? Hazardous Effects of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Nanoplastics in Drosophila. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 919, 170592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. López-Otín, C.; Blasco, M.A.; Partridge, L.; Serrano, M.; Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of Aging: An Expanding Universe. Cell 2023, 186, 243–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Qin, M.; Wang, Y.; Xu, M.; Tang, J.; Tang, X.; Mahmood, Q.; Tang, C.-J. Characterization of the Microplastic Photoaging Under the Action of Typical Salt Ions of Biological Nitrogen Removal Processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Tang, X.; Yang, Z.; Tang, L.; Luo, G.; Liu, C.; Tong, H. How Aging Microplastics Influence Heavy Metal Environmental Fate and Bioavailability: A Systematic Review. Environ. Res. 2025, 271, 121128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chokejaroenrat, C.; Hammawiboon, N.; Weaoseng, P.; Poomipuen, K.; Žgajnar Gotvajn, A.; Pattanateeradetch, A.; Jamnongkan, T.; Imman, S.; Sakulthaew, C. Unraveling Complexation and Contaminant Vector Potential in Aged Polyamide-Heavy Metal Interactions. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 55446–55460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rasool, A.; Halfar, J.; Brožová, K.; Čabanová, K.; Chromíková, J.; Malíková, P.; Motyka, O.; Pertile, E.; Drabinová, S.; Heviánková, S. Interactions of Microplastics with Heavy Metals in the Aquatic Environment: Mechanisms and Mitigation. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2026, 21, 100984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ali, I.; Tan, X.; Peng, C.; Naz, I.; Zhang, Y.; Hernández, A.; Marcos, R.; Pervez, R.; Duan, Z.; Ruan, Y. Eco- and Bio-Corona-Based Microplastics and Nanoplastics Complexes in the Environment: Modulations in the Toxicological Behavior of Plastic Particles and Factors Affecting. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 187, 356–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yang, H.; Chen, Z.; Kong, L.; Xing, H.; Yang, Q.; Wu, J. A Review of Eco-Corona Formation on Micro/Nanoplastics and Its Effects on Stability, Bioavailability, and Toxicity. Water 2025, 17, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Panico, S.; Capolla, S.; Bozzer, S.; Toffoli, G.; Dal Bo, M.; Macor, P. Biological Features of Nanoparticles: Protein Corona Formation and Interaction with the Immune System. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Shefer, A.; Yalovaya, A.; Tamkovich, S. Exosomes in Breast Cancer: Involvement in Tumor Dissemination and Prospects for Liquid Biopsy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bocci, V.; Galafassi, S.; Levantesi, C.; Crognale, S.; Amalfitano, S.; Congestri, R.; Matturro, B.; Rossetti, S.; Di Pippo, F. Freshwater Plastisphere: A Review on Biodiversity, Risks, and Biodegradation Potential with Implications for the Aquatic Ecosystem Health. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1395401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wu, J.; Chen, H.; Xu, J.; Rahman, M.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Huang, S.; Han, C.; Xu, S.; Liu, Y. The Lull before Microplastics Pollution Outbreaks: Some Implications for Human Health and Control Strategies. Nano Today 2024, 54, 102062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cai, R.; Baimanov, D.; Yuan, H.; Xie, H.; Yu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhao, F.; You, Y.; Guan, Y.; et al. Protein Corona-Directed Cellular Recognition and Uptake of Polyethylene Nanoplastics by Macrophages. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 14158–14168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Abdolahpur Monikh, F.; Lehtonen, Š.; Kekäläinen, J.; Karkossa, I.; Auriola, S.; Schubert, K.; Zanut, A.; Peltonen, S.; Niskanen, J.; Bandekar, M.; et al. Biotransformation of Nanoplastics in Human Plasma and Their Permeation Through a Model In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier: An in-Depth Quantitative Analysis. Nano Today 2024, 59, 102466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Müller, L.; Di Benedetto, S. Inflammaging, Immunosenescence, and Cardiovascular Aging: Insights into Long COVID Implications. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 11, 1384996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Huang, D.; Tao, J.; Cheng, M.; Deng, R.; Chen, S.; Yin, L.; Li, R. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in the Environment: Macroscopic Transport and Effects on Creatures. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 407, 124399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Alfonso, M.; Arias, A.; Ronda, A.; Piccolo, M. Continental Microplastics: Presence, Features, and Environmental Transport Pathways. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 799, 149447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jiang, B.; Kauffman, A.; Li, L.; McFee, W.; Cai, B.; Weinstein, J.; Lead, J.; Chatterjee, S.; Scott, G.; Xiao, S. Health Impacts of Environmental Contamination of Micro- and Nanoplastics: A Review. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2020, 25, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jolaosho, T.; Rasaq, M.F.; Omotoye, E.V.; Araomo, O.V.; Adekoya, O.S.; Abolaji, O.Y.; Hungbo, J.J. Microplastics in Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems: Occurrence, Characterization, Sources, Distribution Dynamics, Fate, Transport Processes, Potential Mitigation Strategies, and Policy Interventions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 294, 118036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Erkan, S.; Takatas, B.; Ozturk, A.; Gündoğdu, S.; Aydın, F.; Koker, L.; Ozdemir, O.; Albay, M.; Engin, O. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Microplastic Pollution in Surface Sediments Along the Coastal Areas of Istanbul, Turkey. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 195, 115461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Luo, W.; Su, L.; Craig, N.; Du, F.; Wu, C.; Shi, H. Comparison of Microplastic Pollution in Different Water Bodies from Urban Creeks to Coastal Waters. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 246, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Zhang, W.; Hu, J.; Yin, C.; Ling, L.; Gu, L.; Zheng, L. Characterization of Microplastic Contamination and Influencing Factors in Different Environmental Compartments of a Coal Mining Subsidence Area in Northern Anhui, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 955, 176881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Simon-Sánchez, L.; Grelaud, M.; García-Orellana, J.; Ziveri, P. River Deltas as Hotspots of Microplastic Accumulation: The Case Study of the Ebro River (NW Mediterranean). Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 687, 1186–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Talbot, R.; Granek, E.; Chang, H.; Wood, R.; Brander, S. Spatial and Temporal Variations of Microplastic Concentrations in Portland’s Freshwater Ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 833, 155143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mutshekwa, T.; Mulaudzi, F.; Maiyana, V.; Mofu, L.; Munyai, L.; Murungweni, F. Atmospheric Deposition of Microplastics in Urban, Rural, Forest Environments: A Case Study of Thulamela Local Municipality. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0313840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Klein, M.; Bechtel, B.; Brecht, T.; Fischer, E. Spatial Distribution of Atmospheric Microplastics in Bulk-Deposition of Urban and Rural Environments—A One-Year Follow-Up Study in Northern Germany. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 901, 165923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Semmouri, I.; Vercauteren, M.; Van Acker, E.; Pequeur, E.; Asselman, J.; Janssen, C. Distribution of Microplastics in Freshwater Systems in an Urbanized Region: A Case Study in Flanders (Belgium). Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 872, 162192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Barrows, A.; Christiansen, K.; Bode, E.; Hoellein, T. A Watershed-Scale, Citizen Science Approach to Quantifying Microplastic Concentration in a Mixed Land-Use River. Water Res. 2018, 147, 382–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, W.; Ndungu, A.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. Microplastics Pollution in Inland Freshwaters of China: A Case Study in Urban Surface Waters of Wuhan, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 575, 1369–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hu, J.; He, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Wei, G.; Zhang, Y.; Ok, Y.; Luo, Y. National-Scale Distribution of Micro(Meso)Plastics in Farmland Soils Across China: Implications for Environmental Impacts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 424, 127283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Merga, L.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P.; Van Den Brink, P.; Koelmans, A. Distribution of Microplastic and Small Macroplastic Particles Across Four Fish Species and Sediment in an African Lake. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Egessa, R.; Nankabirwa, A.; Ocaya, H.; Pabire, W.G. Microplastic Pollution in Surface Water of Lake Victoria. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Koutnik, V.; Leonard, J.; Alkidim, S.; DePrima, F.; Ravi, S.; Hoek, E.; Mohanty, S. Distribution of Microplastics in Soil and Freshwater Environments: Global Analysis and Framework for Transport Modeling. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 274, 116552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Pironti, C.; Ricciardi, M.; Motta, O.; Miele, Y.; Proto, A.; Montano, L. Microplastics in the Environment: Intake Through the Food Web, Human Exposure and Toxicological Effects. Toxics 2021, 9, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Borriello, L.; Scivicco, M.; Cacciola, N.; Esposito, F.; Severino, L.; Cirillo, T. Microplastics, a Global Issue: Human Exposure Through Environmental and Dietary Sources. Foods 2023, 12, 3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Prata, J.; Silva, A.; Da Costa, J.; Mouneyrac, C.; Walker, T.; Duarte, A.; Rocha-Santos, T. Solutions and Integrated Strategies for the Control and Mitigation of Plastic and Microplastic Pollution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Ghosh, S.; Sinha, J.; Ghosh, S.; Vashisth, K.; Han, S.; Bhaskar, R. Microplastics as an Emerging Threat to the Global Environment and Human Health. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ziani, K.; Ioniță-Mîndrican, C.-B.; Mititelu, M.; Neacșu, S.; Negrei, C.; Moroșan, E.; Drăgănescu, D.; Preda, O.-T. Microplastics: A Real Global Threat for Environment and Food Safety: A State of the Art Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zolotova, N.; Kosyreva, A.; Dzhalilova, D.; Fokichev, N.; Makarova, O. Harmful Effects of the Microplastic Pollution on Animal Health: A Literature Review. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yelmame, S.; Sonawane, A.; Katiyar, P.; Joshi, N.; Ahire, K. Impacts of Microplastic Exposure on Animal Physiology and Health: A Global Perspective. UTTAR PRADESH J. Zool. 2025, 46, 312–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Smith, M.; Love, D.C.; Rochman, C.M.; Neff, R.A. Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human Health. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2018, 5, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Unuofin, J.O.; Igwaran, A. Microplastics in Seafood: Implications for Food Security, Safety, and Human Health. J. Sea Res. 2023, 194, 102410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Barboza, L.G.A.; Lopes, C.; Oliveira, P.; Bessa, F.; Otero, V.; Henriques, B.; Raimundo, J.; Caetano, M.; Vale, C.; Guilhermino, L. Microplastics in Wild Fish from North East Atlantic Ocean and Its Potential for Causing Neurotoxic Effects, Lipid Oxidative Damage, and Human Health Risks Associated with Ingestion Exposure. Sci Total Environ. 2020, 717, 134625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Critchell, K.; Hoogenboom, M.O. Effects of Microplastic Exposure on the Body Condition and Behaviour of Planktivorous Reef Fish (Acanthochromis polyacanthus). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Prata, J.; Da Costa, J.; Lopes, I.; Andrady, A.; Duarte, A.; Rocha-Santos, T. A One Health Perspective of the Impacts of Microplastics on Animal, Human and Environmental Health. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 146094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Yuan, Z.-H.; Nag, R.; Cummins, E. Human Health Concerns Regarding Microplastics in the Aquatic Environment—From Marine to Food Systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 823, 153730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sánchez, A.; Rodríguez-Viso, P.; Domene, A.; Orozco, H.; Vélez, D.; Devesa, V. Dietary Microplastics: Occurrence, Exposure and Health Implications. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Subaramaniyam, U.; Allimuthu, R.S.; Vappu, S.; Ramalingam, D.; Balan, R.; Paital, B.; Panda, N.; Rath, P.K.; Ramalingam, N.; Sahoo, D.K. Effects of Microplastics, Pesticides and Nano-Materials on Fish Health, Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense Mechanism. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1217666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Prata, J.; Da Costa, J.; Lopes, I.; Duarte, A.; Rocha-Santos, T. Environmental Exposure to Microplastics: An Overview on Possible Human Health Effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 702, 134455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Nihart, A.J.; Garcia, M.A.; El Hayek, E.; Liu, R.; Olewine, M.; Kingston, J.D.; Castillo, E.F.; Gullapalli, R.R.; Howard, T.; Bleske, B.; et al. Bioaccumulation of Microplastics in Decedent Human Brains. Nat. Med. 2025, 31, 1114–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Baroni, A.; Moulton, C.; Cristina, M.; Sansone, L.; Belli, M.; Tasciotti, E. Nano- and Microplastics in the Brain: An Emerging Threat to Neural Health. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Prata, J. Microplastics and Human Health: Integrating Pharmacokinetics. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 53, 1489–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Bocker, R.; Silva, E.K. Microplastics in Our Diet: A Growing Concern for Human Health. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 968, 178882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zarus, G.; Muianga, C.; Hunter, C.; Pappas, R. A Review of Data for Quantifying Human Exposures to Micro and Nanoplastics and Potential Health Risks. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 756, 144010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Da Silva Brito, W.; Mutter, F.; Wende, K.; Cecchini, A.; Schmidt, A.; Bekeschus, S. Consequences of Nano and Microplastic Exposure in Rodent Models: The Known and Unknown. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2022, 19, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Varma, S.; Duttaroy, A.; Basak, S. Human Exposure to Micro- and Nanoplastics: A Mechanistic Perspective of Health Risks Associated with Metabolic and Reproductive Functions. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 989, 179879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Deloid, G.; Yang, Z.; Bazina, L.; Kharaghani, D.; Sadrieh, F.; Demokritou, P. Mechanisms of Ingested Polystyrene Micro-Nanoplastics (MNPs) Uptake and Translocation in an in Vitro Tri-Culture Small Intestinal Epithelium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 473, 134706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Li, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhou, N.; Chen, Y.; Ling, Z.; Xiang, P. Microplastics in the Human Body: A Comprehensive Review of Exposure, Distribution, Migration Mechanisms, and Toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 946, 174215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Khanna, R.; Chandra, A.; Sen, S.; Konyukhov, Y.; Fuentes, E.; Burmistrov, I.; Kravchenko, M. Microplastics and Nanoplastics as Environmental Contaminants of Emerging Concern: Potential Hazards for Human Health. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Brynzak-Schreiber, E.; Schögl, E.; Bapp, C.; Cseh, K.; Kopatz, V.; Jakupec, M.; Weber, A.; Lange, T.; Toca-Herrera, J.; Del Favero, G.; et al. Microplastics Role in Cell Migration and Distribution During Cancer Cell Division. Chemosphere 2024, 353, 141463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yee, M.; Hii, L.-W.; Looi, C.-K.; Lim, W.; Wong, S.; Kok, Y.; Tan, B.; Wong, C.-Y.; Leong, C. Impact of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on Human Health. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Yong, C.; Valiyaveettil, S.; Tang, B. Toxicity of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Mammalian Systems. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lemos, B.; Ren, H. Tissue Accumulation of Microplastics in Mice and Biomarker Responses Suggest Widespread Health Risks of Exposure. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zhang, Z.; Chen, W.; Chan, H.; Peng, J.; Zhu, P.-R.; Li, J.; Jiang, X.-L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Tan, Z.; et al. Polystyrene Microplastics Induce Size-Dependent Multi-Organ Damage in Mice: Insights into Gut Microbiota and Fecal Metabolites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 461, 132503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Mohamed Nor, N.H.; Kooi, M.; Diepens, N.J.; Koelmans, A.A. Lifetime Accumulation of Microplastic in Children and Adults. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 5084–5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sha, M.; Peng, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, N.; Zhao, Y. Impact of Prenatal Micro/Nanoplastics Exposure on Intrauterine Development and Growth: A Systematic Review. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2026, 17, e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mahmud, F.; Sarker, D.B.; Jocelyn, J.A.; Sang, Q.-X.A. Molecular and Cellular Effects of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Focus on Inflammation and Senescence. Cells 2024, 13, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Wen, J.; Lin, Y. Invisible Invaders: Unveiling the Carcinogenic Threat of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Colorectal Cancer-a Systematic Review. Front. Public Health 2025, 13, 1653245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Fournier, E.; Etienne-Mesmin, L.; Grootaert, C.; Jelsbak, L.; Syberg, K.; Blanquet-Diot, S.; Mercier-Bonin, M. Microplastics in the Human Digestive Environment: A Focus on the Potential and Challenges Facing In Vitro Gut Model Development. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 415, 125632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Das, A. The Emerging Role of Microplastics in Systemic Toxicity: Involvement of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 895, 165076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yin, Y.; Yu, L.; Ma, H. Micro/Nanoplastic-Driven Cardiovascular Senescence and Multi-Target Intervention by Traditional Chinese Medicine. Ageing Res. Rev. 2025, 111, 102841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Płuciennik, K.; Sicińska, P.; Misztal, W.; Bukowska, B. Important Factors Affecting Induction of Cell Death, Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage by Nano- and Microplastic Particles In Vitro. Cells 2024, 13, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Banerjee, A.; Shelver, W.L. Micro- and Nanoplastic Induced Cellular Toxicity in Mammals: A Review. Sci Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ding, P.; Xiang, C.; Yao, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Yin, R.; Zhang, L.; Li, A.J.; Hu, G. Aged Polystyrene Microplastics Exposure Affects Apoptosis via Inducing Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Early Life of Zebrafish. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 367, 121995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Meng, X.; Yin, K.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Lu, H.; Hou, L.; Zhao, H.; Xing, M. Polystyrene Microplastics Induced Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Necroptosis via NF-κB and RIP1/RIP3/MLKL Pathway in Chicken Kidney. Toxicology 2022, 478, 153296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Maharana, T.; Taranath, A.; Fernandes, C.S.E.; Mishra, P.; Muralidaran, Y. Micro- and Nanoplastic-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Organelle Miscommunication: A Toxicological Perspective. Toxicology 2026, 519, 154306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Palaniappan, S.; Sadacharan, C.M.; Rostama, B. Polystyrene and Polyethylene Microplastics Decrease Cell Viability and Dysregulate Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Markers of MDCK and L929 Cells In Vitro. Expo. Health 2022, 14, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Cheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Fu, R.; Zhang, P.; Chen, H.; Cao, H.; Jiang, Z.; Hong, Y.; Li, Y.; He, C.; et al. Molecular Mechanism Differences between Nanoplastics and Microplastics in Colon Toxicity: Nanoplastics Induce Ferroptosis-Mediated Immunogenic Cell Death, While Microplastics Cause Cell Metabolic Reprogramming. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Feng, H.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Cen, X.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, K.; Ruan, S.; Yi, R.; et al. Multi-Omics Analysis of Testis After Long-Term Exposure to Polystyrene Nanoplastics Reveals Premature Testicular Aging and Age-Dependent Damage in Mice. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2025, 22, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yang, Q.; Dai, H.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, B.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xu, F.; Ma, Q.; Lin, F.; et al. Oral Feeding of Nanoplastics Affects Brain Function of Mice by Inducing Macrophage IL-1 Signal in the Intestine. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Xuan, Y.; Shen, H.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xu, J. Surface Functionalization-Dependent Inflammatory Potential of Polystyrene Nanoplastics Through the Activation of MAPK/NF-κB Signaling Pathways in Macrophage Raw 264.7. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 251, 114520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Chen, X.; Xuan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhu, M.; Xu, J.; Chen, J. Polystyrene Nanoplastics Induce Intestinal and Hepatic Inflammation Through Activation of NF-κB/NLRP3 Pathways and Related Gut-Liver Axis in Mice. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 935, 173458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhao, L.; Shi, W.; Hu, F.; Song, X.; Cheng, Z.; Zhou, J. Prolonged Oral Ingestion of Microplastics Induced Inflammation in the Liver Tissues of C57BL/6J Mice through Polarization of Macrophages and Increased Infiltration of Natural Killer Cells. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 227, 112882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Busch, M.; Bredeck, G.; Waag, F.; Rahimi, K.; Ramachandran, H.; Bessel, T.; Barcikowski, S.; Herrmann, A.; Rossi, A.; Schins, R.P.F. Assessing the NLRP3 Inflammasome Activating Potential of a Large Panel of Micro- and Nanoplastics in THP-1 Cells. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Lee, S.E.; Kim, D.Y.; Jeong, T.S.; Park, Y. Micro- and Nano-Plastic-Induced Adverse Health Effects on Lungs and Kidneys Linked to Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Life 2025, 15, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Chen, J.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Mei, A.; Wang, X.; Shi, Q. Cellular Absorption of Polystyrene Nanoplastics with Different Surface Functionalization and the Toxicity to RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 252, 114574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Collin-Faure, V.; Vitipon, M.; Torres, A.; Tanyeres, O.; Dalzon, B.; Rabilloud, T. The Internal Dose Makes the Poison: Higher Internalization of Polystyrene Particles Induce Increased Perturbation of Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1092743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Hirt, N.; Body-Malapel, M. Immunotoxicity and Intestinal Effects of Nano- and Microplastics: A Review of the Literature. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2020, 17, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Skaba, D.; Fiegler-Rudol, J.; Dembicka-Mączka, D.; Wiench, R. Nanoplastics and Immune Disruption: A Systematic Review of Exposure Routes, Mechanisms, and Health Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Huang, Y.; Liang, B.; Li, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhang, B.; Du, J.; Ye, R.; Xian, H.; Min, W.; et al. Polystyrene Nanoplastic Exposure Induces Excessive Mitophagy by Activating AMPK/ULK1 Pathway in Differentiated SH-SY5Y Cells and Dopaminergic Neurons In Vivo. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2023, 20, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Song, K.; Gao, S.-H.; Pan, Y.; Gao, R.; Li, T.; Xiao, F.; Zhang, W.; Fan, L.; Guo, J.; Wang, A. Ecological and Health Risk Mediated by Micro(Nano)Plastics Aging Process: Perspectives and Challenges. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 5878–5896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Stefanova, N.; Sotnikova, Y.; Osechkova, A.; Karpova, E.; Polovyanenko, D.; Fursova, A.; Kiseleva, D.; Tolstikova, T.; Ko-losova, N.; Bagryanskaya, E. Invisible but Insidious Effects of Microplastics. Molecules 2024, 29, 5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Jia, R.; Han, J.; Liu, X.; Li, K.; Lai, W.; Bian, L.; Yan, J.; Xi, Z. Exposure to Polypropylene Microplastics via Oral Ingestion Induces Colonic Apoptosis and Intestinal Barrier Damage through Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Mice. Toxics 2023, 11, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Félix, L.; Carreira, P.; Peixoto, F. Effects of Chronic Exposure of Naturally Weathered Microplastics on Oxidative Stress Level, Behaviour, and Mitochondrial Function of Adult Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). Chemosphere 2022, 310, 136895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Li, X.; Piao, J.; Kang, B.; Eom, Y.; Kim, D.H.; Song, J.S. The Toxic Effects of Polystyrene Microplastic/Nanoplastic Particles on Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells and Retinal Tissue. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 54950–54961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Sarasamma, S.; Audira, G.; Siregar, P.; Malhotra, N.; Lai, Y.-H.; Liang, S.-T.; Chen, J.-R.; Chen, K.; Hsiao, C.-D. Nanoplastics Cause Neurobehavioral Impairments, Reproductive and Oxidative Damages, and Biomarker Responses in Zebrafish: Throwing up Alarms of Wide Spread Health Risk of Exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 54950–54961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Liang, X.; Wang, Y.; Andrikopoulos, N.; Ke, P.C.; Li, Y. Dysfunctional Digestive Tract Highlights the Metabolic Hallmarks of Nanoplastic-Exacerbated Parkinson’s Pathology. NPJ Parkinson’s Dis. 2025, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yu, T.; Yao, Y.; Zhao, R.; Yu, R.; Liu, J.; Su, J. Reproductive Toxicity of Microplastics in Female Mice and Their Offspring from Induction of Oxidative Stress. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 327, 121482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Gaspar, L.; Bartman, S.; Coppotelli, G.; Ross, J. Acute Exposure to Microplastics Induced Changes in Behavior and Inflammation in Young and Old Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Hu, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, W.; Liang, J.; Xu, Y.; Su, W. Protective Effect of Cordycepin on Blood-Testis Barrier against Pre-Puberty Polystyrene Nanoplastics Exposure in Male Rats. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2024, 21, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Chen, H.; Hua, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Jin, L.; Dong, C.; Chang, Z.; Ding, P.; Xiang, M.; Li, H.; et al. Chronic Exposure to UV-Aged Microplastics Induces Neurotoxicity by Affecting Dopamine, Glutamate, and Serotonin Neurotransmission in Caenorhabditis Elegans. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Zhang, W.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, K.; Huang, S.; Liang, J.; Dai, Z.; Guo, W.; Mao, C.; Chen, S.; et al. Polyethylene Microplastics Promote Nucleus Pulposus Cell Senescence by Inducing Oxidative Stress via TLR4/NOX2 Axis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 292, 117950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hwangbo, H.; Kim, E.-J.; Kim, G.-Y.; Hwang, S.-Y.; Lee, M.-H.; Choi, Y. Polystyrene Accelerates Aging Related-Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis and -Metabolites in Old-Aged Mouse. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 35, e2504016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Bao, H.; Li, J.; Zhou, D. Transcriptome Sequencing and Metabolite Analysis Revealed the Single and Combined Effects of Microplastics and Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate on Mouse Liver. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wright, S.; Kelly, F. Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6634–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Bucci, K.; Tulio, M.; Rochman, C.M. What Is Known and Unknown about the Effects of Plastic Pollution: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Ecol. Appl. 2020, 30, e02044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Franceschi, C.; Garagnani, P.; Parini, P.; Giuliani, C.; Santoro, A. Inflammaging: A New Immune-Metabolic Viewpoint for Age-Related Diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 576–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Landrigan, P.J.; Fuller, R.; Acosta, N.J.R.; Adeyi, O.; Arnold, R.; Basu, N.N.; Baldé, A.B.; Bertollini, R.; Bose-O’Reilly, S.; Boufford, J.I.; et al. The Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health. Lancet 2018, 391, 462–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Sarigiannis, D.; Karakitsios, S.; Anesti, O.; Stem, A.; Valvi, D.; Sumner, S.C.J.; Chatzi, L.; Snyder, M.P.; Thompson, D.C.; Vasiliou, V. Advancing Translational Exposomics: Bridging Genome, Exposome and Personalized Medicine. Hum Genom. 2025, 19, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Barbosa, F.; Adeyemi, J.; Bocato, M.; Comas, A.; Campiglia, A. A Critical Viewpoint on Current Issues, Limitations, and Future Research Needs on Micro- and Nanoplastic Studies: From the Detection to the Toxicological Assessment. Environ. Res. 2020, 182, 109089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Cunningham, B.; Sharpe, E.; Brander, S.; Landis, W.; Harper, S. Critical Gaps in Nanoplastics Research and Their Connection to Risk Assessment. Front. Toxicol. 2023, 5, 1154538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Viana, M.; Tonin, F.; Ladeira, C. Assessing the Impact of Nanoplastics in Biological Systems: Systematic Review of In Vitro Animal Studies. J. Xenobiotics 2025, 15, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Gigault, J.; Hadri, H.E.; Nguyen, B.; Grassl, B.; Rowenczyk, L.; Tufenkji, N.; Feng, S.; Wiesner, M. Nanoplastics Are Neither Microplastics nor Engineered Nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Gouin, T.; Ellis-Hutchings, R.; Pemberton, M.; Wilhelmus, B. Addressing the Relevance of Polystyrene Nano- and Microplastic Particles Used to Support Exposure, Toxicity and Risk Assessment: Implications and Recommendations. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2024, 21, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Bridgeman, L.; Cimbalo, A.; López-Rodríguez, D.; Pamies, D.; Frangiamone, M. Exploring Toxicological Pathways of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Insights from Animal and Cellular Models. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 490, 137795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Masseroni, A.; Rizzi, C.; Urani, C.; Villa, S. Nanoplastics: Status and Knowledge Gaps in the Finalization of Environmental Risk Assessments. Toxics 2022, 10, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Cai, H.; Xu, E.; Du, F.; Li, R.; Liu, J.-F.; Shi, H. Analysis of Environmental Nanoplastics: Progress and Challenges. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 410, 128208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Nene, A.; Sadeghzade, S.; Viaroli, S.; Yang, W.; Uchenna, U.P.; Kandwal, A.; Liu, X.; Somani, P.; Galluzzi, M. Recent Advances and Future Technologies in Nano-Microplastics Detection. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2025, 37, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Dumont, G.; Rodrigues, A.; Velimirovic, M.; Lievens, S.; Jordens, J.; Focant, J.; Stefanuto, P. Microplastic and Nanoplastic Analysis: From Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry to Pyrolysis Two-dimensional Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry—A Critical Review. J. Sep. Sci. 2025, 48, e70287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Sorolla-Rosario, D.; Llorca-Porcel, J.; Pérez-Martínez, M.; Lozano-Castelló, D.; Bueno-López, A. Microplastics’ Analysis in Water: Easy Handling of Samples by a New Thermal Extraction Desorption-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (TED-GC/MS) Methodology. Talanta 2023, 253, 123829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Abdolahpur Monikh, F.; Chupani, L.; Vijver, M.G.; Vancová, M.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M. Analytical Approaches for Characterizing and Quantifying Engineered Nanoparticles in Biological Matrices from an (Eco)Toxicological Perspective: Old Challenges, New Methods and Techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 660, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Gregar, F.; Baron, D.; Pluháček, T. Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis. J. Sep. Sci. 2025, 48, e70259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Tsochatzis, E.; Gika, H.; Theodoridis, G.; Maragou, N.; Thomaidis, N.; Corredig, M. Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Exposure and Toxicological Effects Require Important Analysis Considerations. Heliyon 2024, 10, e32261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Adhikari, S.; Kelkar, V.; Kumar, R.; Halden, R.U. Methods and Challenges in the Detection of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: A Mini-Review. Polym. Int. 2022, 71, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Rauert, C.; Wang, X.; Charlton, N.; Lin, C.-Y.; Tang, C.; Zammit, I.; Jayarathne, A.; Symeonides, C.; White, E.; Christensen, M.; et al. Blueprint for the Design, Construction, and Validation of a Plastic and Phthalate-Minimised Laboratory. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 468, 133803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Barceló, D.; Picó, Y.; Alfarhan, A. Microplastics: Detection in Human Samples, Cell Line Studies, and Health Impacts. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 101, 104204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Otorkpa, O.J.; Otorkpa, C.O. Health Effects of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Review of Published Case Reports. Environ. Anal. Health Toxicol. 2024, 39, e2024020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Durkin, A.M.; Zou, R.; Boucher, J.M.; Boyles, M.S.; van Boxel, J.; Bustamante, M.; Christopher, E.A.; Dadvand, P.; Dusza, H.M.; van Duursen, M.; et al. Investigating Exposure and Hazards of Micro- and Nanoplastics During Pregnancy and Early Life (AURORA Project): Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2024, 13, e63176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Vojnits, K.; De León, A.; Gibon, J.; Barker, P.; Mahmoudi, M.; Pakpour, S. A Systematic Review of the Potential Neurotoxicity of Micro-and Nanoplastics: The Known and Unknown. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2025, 22, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Cai, Z.; Li, M.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, X.; Huang, Y.; Li, T.; Gong, H.; Yan, M. Biological Degradation of Plastics and Microplastics: A Recent Perspective on Associated Mechanisms and Influencing Factors. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Gao, H.-T.; Zhou, H.-Q.; Ji, H.-N.; Shen, J.Z.; Yin, D.-M.; Wu, D. From Exposure to Neurotoxicity Induced by Micro-Nanoplastics with Brain Accumulation and Cognitive Decline. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 304, 119114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Wild, C.P. The Exposome: From Concept to Utility. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 41, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Identified micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) across the globe in different environmental compartments, such as rivers, lakes, and soils [109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121]. The map summarizes geographic locations where MNPs have been detected in environmental matrices including freshwater systems (rivers and lakes), marine environments, estuaries, agricultural soils, mining areas, and areas affected by atmospheric deposition. Symbols represent the environmental compartment in which MNPs were reported. These findings illustrate the extensive environmental dissemination of MNPs and their ability to circulate across interconnected terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric systems. Within a One Health perspective, this widespread distribution underscores the potential for MNPs to move through ecosystems and food chains, ultimately contributing to human exposure.
Figure 1. Identified micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) across the globe in different environmental compartments, such as rivers, lakes, and soils [109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121]. The map summarizes geographic locations where MNPs have been detected in environmental matrices including freshwater systems (rivers and lakes), marine environments, estuaries, agricultural soils, mining areas, and areas affected by atmospheric deposition. Symbols represent the environmental compartment in which MNPs were reported. These findings illustrate the extensive environmental dissemination of MNPs and their ability to circulate across interconnected terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric systems. Within a One Health perspective, this widespread distribution underscores the potential for MNPs to move through ecosystems and food chains, ultimately contributing to human exposure.
Jox 16 00052 g001
Figure 2. Bioaccumulation of plastic in the food chain due to plastic litter, microplastic and nanoplastic pollution. Environmental plastic debris progressively fragments into micro- and nanoplastics that enter terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and become incorporated into soils and organic matter. These particles can be taken up by plants or ingested by primary consumers such as soil and aquatic invertebrates. Through trophic transfer, micro- and nanoplastics may move to higher trophic levels, including insects, fish, birds, and other predators. This process illustrates how plastic pollution can propagate through food chains and contribute to indirect exposure in higher organisms, including humans.
Figure 2. Bioaccumulation of plastic in the food chain due to plastic litter, microplastic and nanoplastic pollution. Environmental plastic debris progressively fragments into micro- and nanoplastics that enter terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and become incorporated into soils and organic matter. These particles can be taken up by plants or ingested by primary consumers such as soil and aquatic invertebrates. Through trophic transfer, micro- and nanoplastics may move to higher trophic levels, including insects, fish, birds, and other predators. This process illustrates how plastic pollution can propagate through food chains and contribute to indirect exposure in higher organisms, including humans.
Jox 16 00052 g002
Figure 3. Sources of micro- and nanoplastic (MNP) exposure across the lifespan, including food, synthetic fibres, occupational exposure, and polypharmacy, which may contribute to progressive bioaccumulation as exposure increases and physiological clearance declines over time. Exposure may begin in utero through maternal exposure and possible placental transfer, although evidence documenting direct foetal biological effects of MNPs remains limited [155]. During childhood, exposure may arise from plastic-containing products such as toys, food packaging, drinking water, and indoor dust or fibres. In adolescence and adulthood, additional sources include cosmetics and occupational environments. Across the lifespan, cumulative exposure combined with reduced clearance may promote gradual accumulation of micro- and nanoplastics in the body.
Figure 3. Sources of micro- and nanoplastic (MNP) exposure across the lifespan, including food, synthetic fibres, occupational exposure, and polypharmacy, which may contribute to progressive bioaccumulation as exposure increases and physiological clearance declines over time. Exposure may begin in utero through maternal exposure and possible placental transfer, although evidence documenting direct foetal biological effects of MNPs remains limited [155]. During childhood, exposure may arise from plastic-containing products such as toys, food packaging, drinking water, and indoor dust or fibres. In adolescence and adulthood, additional sources include cosmetics and occupational environments. Across the lifespan, cumulative exposure combined with reduced clearance may promote gradual accumulation of micro- and nanoplastics in the body.
Jox 16 00052 g003
Figure 4. Effects of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) on molecular mechanisms relevant to aging. Due to the effects of MNPs at a molecular and cellular level, these particles may contribute to biological aging. MNP exposure may induce oxidative stress, characterized by increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation, and potential DNA damage. MNPs may also lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, including reduced membrane potential and impaired cellular respiration, which may compromise cellular energy metabolism. In parallel, exposure may promote inflammatory responses and immune dysregulation, including activation of innate immune pathways and macrophage or microglial activation, contributing to chronic low-grade inflammation. Persistent cellular stress may ultimately lead to premature cellular senescence, characterized by the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) and altered intercellular communication, processes closely linked to the progression of aging-related dysfunction.
Figure 4. Effects of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) on molecular mechanisms relevant to aging. Due to the effects of MNPs at a molecular and cellular level, these particles may contribute to biological aging. MNP exposure may induce oxidative stress, characterized by increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation, and potential DNA damage. MNPs may also lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, including reduced membrane potential and impaired cellular respiration, which may compromise cellular energy metabolism. In parallel, exposure may promote inflammatory responses and immune dysregulation, including activation of innate immune pathways and macrophage or microglial activation, contributing to chronic low-grade inflammation. Persistent cellular stress may ultimately lead to premature cellular senescence, characterized by the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) and altered intercellular communication, processes closely linked to the progression of aging-related dysfunction.
Jox 16 00052 g004
Figure 5. Conceptual framework linking environmental micro- and nanoplastic exposure to aging-related biological effects within a One Health perspective. Micro- and nanoplastics originate from environmental reservoirs such as marine systems, soils, and the food chain, leading to chronic human exposure primarily through ingestion and inhalation. After entering the body, these particles may distribute systemically and accumulate in multiple organs, including the brain, lungs, liver, and gastrointestinal tract. Experimental evidence indicates that MNP exposure can trigger cellular mechanisms associated with aging biology, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and cellular senescence. These processes may contribute to functional decline across multiple physiological systems. Age-related factors such as cumulative exposure, reduced detoxification capacity, and immunosenescence may further increase vulnerability in older populations. MNP, Micro- and nanoplastics.
Figure 5. Conceptual framework linking environmental micro- and nanoplastic exposure to aging-related biological effects within a One Health perspective. Micro- and nanoplastics originate from environmental reservoirs such as marine systems, soils, and the food chain, leading to chronic human exposure primarily through ingestion and inhalation. After entering the body, these particles may distribute systemically and accumulate in multiple organs, including the brain, lungs, liver, and gastrointestinal tract. Experimental evidence indicates that MNP exposure can trigger cellular mechanisms associated with aging biology, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and cellular senescence. These processes may contribute to functional decline across multiple physiological systems. Age-related factors such as cumulative exposure, reduced detoxification capacity, and immunosenescence may further increase vulnerability in older populations. MNP, Micro- and nanoplastics.
Jox 16 00052 g005
Table 1. Micro- and nanoplastic distribution across environmental compartments.
Table 1. Micro- and nanoplastic distribution across environmental compartments.
Study/LocationCompartments SampledSampling Design & MethodsMP Concentration (as Reported)Dominant Size, Shape, PolymerKey Spatial/Temporal PatternsReference
Coastal Istanbul, Marmara Sea (Turkey)Marine surface sediments (43 stations, 5–70 m depth)4 seasons; grab sediments; density separation; polymer ID by spectroscopyMean (±SD) by season: fall 2000 ± 4100, winter 1600 ± 3900, spring 4300 ± 12,000, summer 9500 ± 20,300 particles/kg DWFibres dominant in fall–spring; fragments dominant in summer; 11 polymers, mainly PE (44%) and PP (31%)Hotspots at river mouths (Golden Horn) and sea-outfall discharges; strong seasonal variation linked to mucilage in summer.[109]
Yangtze Delta, China (Shanghai & East China Sea)Urban creeks, rivers, estuary, coastal waters (surface water)Multi-reach comparison along river–estuary–coast gradient; grab/net surface samples1.8–2.4 items/L in freshwater creeks/rivers vs. ~0.9 items/L in estuary/coastal watersFibers highest in creeks (88%) decreasing seaward; polyesters dominate inland; fibre %: creeks 88%, rivers 81–85%, estuary 66%, coastal 37%MP abundance decreases from small urban creeks to estuary/coast; downstream increase within rivers toward city centre/estuary.[110]
Panji coal-mining subsidence area, Anhui (China)Soil, surface water, sedimentField survey across mining landscape; density separation, microscopy; polymer IDMean abundance: soil 1860.8 n/kg, surface water 11,323.7 n/m3, sediment 384.0 n/kgPredominantly transparent fibres < 0.1 mm; PE common in soil; PP dominant in water and sedimentHigh MP contamination in all three compartments; distributions correlated with pH, TP, TOC in soil/sediment and with pH, TN, NO3-N in water.[111]
Ebro River Delta, NW Mediterranean (Spain)River surface water, estuarine benthic sediments, sandy beach sedimentsSingle-campaign field survey; nets for surface water; grabs/cores for sediments; µ-Raman on subsetMean abundance: river surface water 3.5 ± 1.4 MPs/m3; estuarine benthic sediments 2052 ± 746 MPs/kg DW; sandy beaches 422 ± 119 MPs/kg DWFibers ~70 ± 22% of MPs; most particles < 1000 µm, especially 200–500 µmEstuarine benthic sediments identified as major MP sink; higher MP levels in estuary than adjacent beaches and overlying water.[112]
Portland, Oregon (USA)Urban–rural rivers/streams (surface water)Two watersheds; 3 sampling months (Aug, Sep, Feb); spatial gradient; size-fractionated analysisConcentrations higher in August (low flow) than February; small (<100 µm) particles more common in AugustFragments most common; gray color dominant; PE most frequent polymerNegative correlation between MP concentration and flow; positive relation with antecedent 24 h precipitation in wet season; near-stream land use stronger predictor than watershed-scale variables.[113]
Thulamela Municipality, South AfricaAtmospheric bulk deposition (urban, rural, forest)Bulk collectors at 3 environments; MPs/m2/day; polymer ID90.51 ± 15.19 to 355.64 ± 47.65 particles/m2/day; mean 211.87 ± 31.44 particles/m2/dayMainly transparent fibres; PET dominantHighest fluxes in urban, lowest in forest; in forest, deposition positively correlated with rainfall, indicating scavenging from air.[114]
Northern Germany (Hamburg & Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania)Atmospheric bulk deposition (urban & rural)11 sites; monthly sampling for 1 year (306 samples); Nile Red staining; µ-Raman on subset; >10 µmMean 89 ± 61 MP/m2/dayFibers and fragments; polymer mix characterized by µ-RamanSignificantly higher deposition in urban than rural sites; population density positively related to flux and fibre share; forest canopy “comb-out” effect modifies local deposition.[115]
Pan-regional, Flanders (Belgium)Freshwater surface water and sediments9 locations; 43 water and 9 sediment samples; some resampled under different weather; µFTIR (25–1000 µm)Surface water: 0–4.8 MP/L (mean 0.48 MP/L); sediments: 0–9558 MP/kg DW (mean 2774.6 ± 2317.9 MP/kg DW)PS and PP most common polymers; size 25–1000 µmLarge spatial variability; no clear correlation with rainfall, flow, pH, DO, conductivity, or land use; some sediment concentrations above ecological risk thresholds.[116]
Gallatin River watershed, Montana (USA)River surface water (mixed land-use catchment)72 sites; 4 seasons/year over 2 years (714 samples); ~1-L grabs; citizen-science samplingMPs in 57% samples; mean 1.2 particles/L; majority <-L count range; high temporal varianceFibers 80%, 0.1–1.5 mm; 93% of analyzed particles synthetic/semi-syntheticStrong temporal variation; no clear longitudinal or land-use gradient; MP concentration negatively related to discharge at gauged sites (dilution effect).[117]
Wuhan, Hubei (China)Urban lakes and river reaches (surface water)20 lakes plus urban Hanjiang & Yangtze reaches; spatial survey; nets or grabs1660.0 ± 639.1 to 8925 ± 1591 n/m3; highest in Bei LakeFibers and coloured plastics; >80% <2 mm; PET & PP dominantMP abundance in lakes decreases with distance from city centre (p < 0.001); rivers generally lower than urban lakes.[118]
Farmland soils across China (30 sites)Agricultural soils (vertical profiles)National-scale survey; 30 farmlands; depth-resolved cores; density separation; spectroscopy25.56–2067.78 items/kg (mean 358.37 items/kg ≈ 6.79 mg/kg or 0.0007% by mass); MPs ≈93.1% of particlesPP, PE, polyester most common; abundance decreases with depthHigher soil MP levels in arid/semi-arid north vs. milder southwest; national meta-analysis shows some measured concentrations approach effect thresholds for soil properties and crops.[119]
Lake Ziway (Ethiopia) Shoreline sediment; fish (4 species)Sediment cores + GI tracts of 4 fish species; ATR-FTIR; wet/dry season comparisonSediment median 30,000 (400–124,000) particles/m2 and 764 (0.05–36,233) mg/kg DW; 35% of fish with plastics; median 4 particles/fish (1–26)PP, PE, alkyd varnish; sizes from micro to small macro; similar log-linear size distributions in fish and sedimentHigher fish ingestion near plastic sources and in wet season; benthic and benthopelagic fish carry more plastics than planktivores; sediment levels exceed some effect thresholds.[120]
Lake Victoria (Tanzania, Uganda, and Kenya)Lake surface water (near beaches, rural fish landings, river inflows)Manta trawl (0.3–4.9 mm) along lake-surface transects; sites grouped by human use2834–329,167 particles/km2 (0.02–2.19 particles/m2); highest in urban/recreational beach sites (0.69–2.19 particles/m2)All secondary MPs; 36% < 1 mm; PE and PP dominantStrong gradient: urban/recreational > rural landings > river-inflow sites; clear influence of local human activity and waste management.[121]
MP, microplastic; PE, polyethylene; PP, polypropylene; PS, polystyrene; PET, polyethylene terephthalate; DW, dry weight; SD, standard deviation; µm, micrometre; m, metre; kg, kilogram; L, litre; m3, cubic metre; MPs/m2/day, microplastics per square metre per day; TOC, total organic carbon; TP, total phosphorus; TN, total nitrogen; NO3-N, nitrate nitrogen; DO, dissolved oxygen; µFTIR, micro Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy; ATR-FTIR, attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy; µ-Raman, micro-Raman spectroscopy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moulton, C.; Baroni, A.; Tasciotti, E. Micro- and Nanoplastics Exposure Across the Lifespan: One Health Implications for Aging and Longevity. J. Xenobiot. 2026, 16, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16020052

AMA Style

Moulton C, Baroni A, Tasciotti E. Micro- and Nanoplastics Exposure Across the Lifespan: One Health Implications for Aging and Longevity. Journal of Xenobiotics. 2026; 16(2):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16020052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moulton, Chantalle, Anna Baroni, and Ennio Tasciotti. 2026. "Micro- and Nanoplastics Exposure Across the Lifespan: One Health Implications for Aging and Longevity" Journal of Xenobiotics 16, no. 2: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16020052

APA Style

Moulton, C., Baroni, A., & Tasciotti, E. (2026). Micro- and Nanoplastics Exposure Across the Lifespan: One Health Implications for Aging and Longevity. Journal of Xenobiotics, 16(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16020052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop