Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
PharmaceuticsPharmaceutics
  • Review
  • Open Access

29 November 2025

49 Pages

Advances in Drug Delivery Science for Diacerein: Strategies to Enhance Solubility, Bioavailability, and Pharmacokinetic Performance

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran
2
Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran
3
USERN Office, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran
4
Nano Drug Delivery Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran

Abstract

Diacerein is known as a disease-modifying anti-inflammatory drug, primarily used for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Despite its therapeutic potential, the clinical use of diacerein is hindered by poor aqueous solubility, low bioavailability, liver issues, and gastrointestinal side effects, particularly diarrhea. To address these limitations, various innovative pharmaceutical formulation approaches have been explored, including physical modifications, chemical complexation, nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems, and synergistic combination therapies. This review highlights progress in formulation approaches aimed at enhancing the solubility and therapeutic profile of diacerein. Special emphasis is placed on lipid-based carriers, vesicular systems, pH-responsive hydrogels, and dissolving microneedles. Together, these strategies provide a comprehensive platform for the rational design of diacerein formulations, offering promising avenues to overcome its clinical limitations and improve patient outcomes. The insights presented here may also guide the development of more effective delivery systems for other poorly soluble anti-inflammatory agents.

1. Introduction

Diacerein (DCN) is a promising anti-inflammatory agent with disease-modifying potential, which makes it beneficial for treating a spectrum of inflammatory conditions, including osteoarthritis (OA), epidermolysis bullosa (EB), psoriasis, diabetic complications, and ocular inflammatory diseases [1,2,3,4]. At the outset, due to its anti-inflammatory, chondroprotective, and analgesic properties, it was prescribed for the management of joint diseases. Subsequently, the therapeutic potential of DCN has positioned it as a key agent in the management of other inflammatory diseases [1,2,5,6,7,8]. DCN selectively inhibits interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), thereby avoiding regular adverse effects associated with NSAIDs, such as gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and cardiovascular complications. This mechanism enables diacerein to serve as a safer option for managing long-term inflammatory diseases [9,10].
Despite such therapeutic advantages, DCN faces significant pharmacokinetic challenges, including poor aqueous solubility, extensive first-pass metabolism, and low bioavailability [11,12,13], all of which limit its clinical effectiveness [14,15,16].
To overcome these limitations, researchers have explored a range of innovative oral formulation strategies designed to enhance DCN’s bioavailability. Among these, nanoparticle-based formulations, lipid-based carriers, and solid dispersions (SDs) have demonstrated significant promise [16,17,18]. Cyclodextrin (CD) inclusion complexes improve drug stability and solubility by forming host–guest molecular structures that protect against premature degradation [7]. Solid dispersion technology involves dispersing DCN within hydrophilic polymer matrices, thereby increasing dissolution rate and promoting more consistent pharmacokinetic profiles [19,20].
Beyond oral formulations, alternative drug delivery approaches, such as intra-articular injections and transdermal systems, have been developed to circumvent GI side effects and improve localized drug release. Liposomal, hyalurosomal, and niosomal formulations facilitate targeted site delivery, thereby reducing systemic exposure and improving drug retention at the site of inflammation [8,19,20]. Furthermore, transdermal nanoemulgel systems and microemulsions offer enhanced skin penetration and controlled drug release, making them promising options for psoriasis and other inflammatory skin conditions [21,22].
Despite these advancements, challenges remain in achieving complete optimization of diacerein’s pharmacokinetics. Current formulation strategies predominantly focus on overcoming these challenges. Additionally, the majority of studies emphasize drug delivery mechanisms [15,23,24,25], often overlooking the potential of physicochemical modifications to improve DCN’s stability and systemic retention further.
Importantly, the relevance of selecting DCN is supported by its emerging multi-target pharmacological profile. Recent evidence, including a comprehensive review by Almezgagi et al., highlights DCN’s anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-fibrotic, and neuroprotective effects across diverse conditions, mediated via the IL-1β, TNF-α, NF-κB, and MAPK/ERK pathways. These properties, coupled with its generally acceptable safety profile at optimized doses, make DCN a strong candidate for advancement through modern drug-delivery and physicochemical optimization strategies [26]. Furthermore, early-phase clinical investigations in osteoarthritis, metabolic inflammation, and type 2 diabetes suggest potential therapeutic expansion, reinforcing the scientific justification for a renewed evaluation of DCN’s formulation landscape [27].
This review aims to provide an integrated evaluation of recent advancements in diacerein formulation, combining both physicochemical modification strategies and nano-/advanced drug-delivery approaches to present a cohesive and comprehensive understanding of the current formulation landscape. Although the findings of current studies may offer limited insight into fully addressing these challenges, efforts have been made to scrutinize and analyze the available data. Therefore, this study provides a comprehensive framework for optimizing DCN’s pharmacokinetic profile and long-term therapeutic efficacy across multiple inflammatory disease conditions.

2. Absorption of Diacerein: Role of Physicochemical Properties

DCN, an anthraquinone derivative (1,8-diacetoxy-3-carboxyanthraquinone) [9], falls under the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class II. DCN is characterized by very low aqueous solubility (~7–10 µg/mL, depending on pH) [1,3,28] and a log p value of approximately 2.4 based on experimental patent data (EP2349289B1) [29]. These physicochemical constraints limit its dissolution and absorption in physiological fluids, despite its high membrane permeability. With a molecular weight of 368.29 g/mol and high lipophilicity, DCN demonstrates limited solubility and slow dissolution rates [10,15]. The dissolution rate of DCN represents the principal rate-limiting step in its pharmacokinetics, contributing to a relatively low oral bioavailability of 35–56% [10,13,14,30,31]. Moreover, DCN undergoes pH-dependent hydrolysis under acidic conditions (pH ~1.2), which further reduces bioavailability and increases pharmacokinetic variability. Conversely, solubility improves markedly at intestinal pH (~6.8, neutral to slightly alkaline), highlighting the need for modified-release formulations, such as co-crystallization, solid dispersion, and complexation techniques, to enhance absorption and prevent premature degradation [10,30,32].
These physicochemical limitations and their pH-dependent behavior are illustrated in Figure 1, which shows the chemical structure of DCN along with its physicochemical profiles.
Figure 1. Key physicochemical features of diacerein, illustrating its chemical structure, low intrinsic solubility, BCS Class II status, and pH-dependent behavior in both solubility and hydrolytic degradation.
Following oral administration, DCN is rapidly hydrolyzed in the intestine to rhein, its active metabolite, which exhibits a mean elimination half-life of approximately 7–8 h under steady-state conditions [33]. This active metabolite is responsible for its anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects [10,26]. However, rhein undergoes extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism, leading to its rapid conjugation into glucuronide and sulfate derivatives that are excreted renally, thereby significantly reducing systemic drug availability [17,30,34,35]. Peak plasma concentrations are typically reached within 2–3 h, but bioavailability remains inconsistent due to high inter-individual variability in metabolism [10,32].
Molecular modeling studies suggest that DCN’s poor solubility is primarily attributed to its rigid crystalline structure and strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding, both of which significantly impede its dissolution in biological fluids [10,11,36]. In addition, its high hydrophobicity further limits systemic absorption, reinforcing the need for effective solubility-enhancing strategies [15,26,30,35,37].
Compared to other pharmacological treatments for OA, DCN exhibits distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, especially in contrast to NSAIDs and symptomatic slow-acting drugs (SYSADOAs). NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen, diclofenac, and celecoxib, act rapidly by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes and reducing prostaglandin synthesis, thereby providing immediate symptom relief [35]. These agents typically demonstrate higher aqueous solubility, predictable oral absorption, and rapid systemic activity; however, they are associated with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks [14,35]. While NSAIDs offer rapid symptom relief, their long-term safety remains a concern. In contrast, DCN acts by inhibiting IL-1β and TNF-α, resulting in a slower onset of action but with potential for disease modification. This mechanism may delay cartilage degradation and slow the progression of OA, thereby providing long-term chondroprotective benefits [10,30]. The therapeutic effects of diacerein are primarily mediated through the inhibition of IL-1β and TNF-α pathways, which contribute to a broad spectrum of inflammatory and degenerative diseases. These disease-modifying effects are summarized in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Expanded therapeutic spectrum of diacerein across inflammatory and degenerative disorders. The figure illustrates how IL-1β and TNF-α inhibition drives downstream disease-modifying effects, including reduced matrix degradation in osteoarthritis, suppression of JNK-mediated stress responses in epidermolysis bullosa, modulation of immune cell migration in psoriasis, preservation of pancreatic β-cell function in type 2 diabetes, attenuation of joint synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis, and decreased local inflammation with prolonged residence time in ocular diseases.
Compared to SYSADOAs such as glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate, DCN exhibits superior anti-inflammatory activity, primarily due to its ability to inhibit IL-1β, a key cytokine involved in OA progression [10,35]. Despite these advantages, challenges related to DCN, discussed more extensively in the following section, necessitate formulation modifications to achieve consistent and effective therapeutic outcomes [30].

3. Factors Limiting the Bioavailability and Stability of DCN

As mentioned before, a significant obstacle to DCN’s clinical use is its physicochemical properties, which result in delayed dissolution and slow onset of action, thereby limiting its effectiveness in managing inflammatory diseases [38,39,40,41,42]. This challenge also hinders pharmaceutical development, contributing to inconsistent patient responses, safety concerns, raised costs, and heightened toxicity risks [40,43]. This limitation restricts DCN’s dissolution in GI fluids, a critical step for oral drug absorption [44]. Furthermore, the crystalline form of DCN reduces its solubility, as the strong lattice structure of crystalline Diacerein hinders molecular diffusion, resulting in slower dissolution compared to its amorphous form [45]. Likewise, low and unpredictable absorption of DCN may increase the risk of side effects, such as stomach irritation, soft stools, and urine discoloration, as patients often require higher doses to achieve the desired therapeutic effects [12,46,47]. According to a Cochrane systematic review of seven randomized controlled trials involving 1462 participants with osteoarthritis, patients treated with diacerein for 2 to 36 months experienced a significantly higher incidence of adverse effects compared to those receiving a placebo. The main side effect was diarrhea, with a relative risk of 3.52 and an absolute risk increase of 24%, implying that one additional adverse reaction occurs for every four patients treated with DCN [12]. Consequently, due to these clinical challenges, the oral use of DCN-containing medicines in patients aged 60 years or older with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or OA has been restricted [32,33].
Another major pharmacokinetic limitation is the rapid enzymatic hydrolysis of DCN in the GI tract, where it is extensively converted into rhein before reaching systemic circulation, leading to low bioavailability and reduced therapeutic efficacy [38,40,41,48,49]. The metabolic instability also contributes to significant GI irritation and diarrhea, typical side effects that compromise long-term patient adherence [38,40,41,50]. Additionally, first-pass metabolism and enzymatic degradation further diminish systemic drug retention, highlighting the need for controlled-release and targeted formulations to enhance pharmacokinetic stability [24,42,51]. Given its short biological half-life, DCN necessitates frequent dosing, resulting in plasma level fluctuations and inconsistent therapeutic effects, which further complicates treatment regimens for chronic inflammatory conditions [3,4,42,50].
Beyond bioavailability concerns, DCN poses significant formulation challenges due to its instability in aqueous solutions, undergoing rapid degradation in both acidic and alkaline environments, which further compromises solubility and systemic absorption [23,52,53]. Moreover, in certain topical and transdermal applications, disease-related alterations in skin integrity—such as those observed in psoriasis or inflammatory conditions—may reduce the effective diffusion of DCN across biological membranes, leading to variability in systemic absorption and therapeutic response [1,21,48,52,54,55,56,57,58].
Similarly, DCN’s limited intra-articular retention reduces localized drug availability, underscoring the importance of biodegradable, sustained-release carriers for targeted treatment in inflammatory conditions [55,59]. In addition, its instability in conventional topical formulations, manifested through burst drug release and precipitation, undermines the effectiveness of alternative drug delivery systems [60,61,62]. The crystalline nature of DCN also impairs dissolution rates and systemic absorption, contributing to fluctuations in plasma drug levels and variability in therapeutic response, thereby necessitating optimized formulation strategies [20,43,63]. From a pharmaceutical and regulatory standpoint, the lack of standardized quality control methods for DCN, particularly in multi-drug formulations, presents challenges in analytical procedures, impurity detection, and stability assessment, emphasizing the importance of robust monitoring techniques [22,64].

4. Enhancing Bioavailability of DCN: Physical to Nanocarrier-Based Approaches

Given the limitations of DCN’s rapid enzymatic hydrolysis, and low systemic retention, numerous formulation strategies have been explored to enhance its therapeutic efficacy. These strategies can be broadly categorized into physicochemical modifications, chemical approaches, and nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems, each offering unique mechanisms to optimize dissolution, absorption, and sustained drug release. The distinct advantages and limitations of examples of each method are summarized in Table 1.
Physicochemical modifications aim to enhance the dissolution rates and absorption of DCN by altering its physical characteristics [65,66,67,68]. Techniques such as particle size reduction through micronization, nanocrystal formation, and spray drying enable an increase in surface area, thereby improving dissolution and oral bioavailability. Amorphization, which disrupts the drug’s crystalline structure, further enhances wettability and dissolution kinetics, resulting in improved bioavailability [23,53]. Additionally, co-processing with bio-enhancers and hydrophilic carriers—such as cyclodextrin inclusion complexes, liposomal and proliposomal systems, solid dispersions, and topical emulsifying formulations—has been reported to improve the solubility, permeability, and dissolution rate of Diacerein, resulting in enhanced bioavailability [19,40,53,69,70].
Alternatively, chemical modifications aim to modify DCN’s molecular properties to enhance systemic bioavailability [66,71,72,73]. Additionally, CD complexation and co-crystal formation enhance dissolution rates and facilitate controlled drug release, enabling more predictable pharmacokinetics and prolonged therapeutic effects [4,74].
Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems offer targeted and controlled-release formulations that enhance bioavailability while minimizing side effects [43,46,71,75]. Nanocarriers such as liposomes, micelles, and nanoemulsions improve both oral and transdermal bioavailability and reduce GI irritation [23,53]. Biodegradable polymer-based carriers facilitate sustained intra-articular drug release, improving localized treatment for inflammatory conditions [60,76]. Dissolvable microneedles provide a minimally invasive approach for transdermal delivery, enabling controlled drug release and improving patient compliance [20,53]. Furthermore, emulsification-based systems, including self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) and nanoemulsions, enhance the dissolution, and absorption of Diacerein, leading to improved bioavailability [53].
In EB, nanoemulgels and nanofibrous dressings may enhance drug penetration and enable controlled release, thereby promoting wound healing and patient comfort. In psoriasis, liposomal and polymeric nanoformulations may stabilize DCN, providing longer-lasting therapeutic effects [77,78]. In ocular inflammation, mucoadhesive nanoparticles and liposomal eye drops can enhance drug retention and absorption, promising them for the treatment of uveitis and dry eye syndrome [79,80]. For diabetes, DCN’s anti-inflammatory properties aid in managing chronic inflammation, nephropathy, and neuropathy; however, low bioavailability limits its therapeutic efficacy [81]. Nanocarriers and enteric-coated formulations may enhance systemic retention, while smart hydrogels and nanofiber dressings show promise in improving diabetic wound healing [82,83].
All of the mentioned strategies offer promising pathways to overcome DCN’s pharmacokinetic limitations, ensuring improved absorption, sustained release, and enhanced clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, selecting the most appropriate approach depends on the drug’s physicochemical properties and the intended delivery route. Future direction may focus on hybrid systems that integrate efficacy, stability, and safety. In the following sections explore these key strategies and their impact on enhancing DCN’s therapeutic performance.
Table 1. Comparative analysis of solubility enhancement techniques for DCN.

4.1. Physical Strategies to Improve DCN Solubility

Various physical formulation strategies have been developed, including SD, fast-dissolving tablets (FDTs), matrix-based controlled-release tablets, microsphere-based formulations, and gastro-retentive (GR) systems For DCN. These approaches aim to enhance dissolution, improve absorption, and prolong therapeutic effects, thereby increasing efficacy and patient compliance [65,66,67,73,99]. A comparative analysis of these strategies with more detail is presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Comparative analysis of physical strategies for DCN solubility/bioavailability enhancement.

4.1.1. Solid Dispersion System for Enhanced Dissolution

Solid dispersion (SD) is a widely studied technique for enhancing the solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs by dispersing them in hydrophilic carriers. This method reduces crystallinity, increases wettability, and improves dissolution characteristics. Various SD formulations have been developed for DCN, including Pluronic® F127-based SDs, which increased the dissolution rate by 8.6-fold compared to crystalline DCN [6], and ternary SDs incorporating Pluronic® F127, Solutol® HS15, and PEG 35K, which improved solubility to 70.2 µg/mL and achieved 79.28% drug release within 60 min [3]. PEG 8000 and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) K30-based SDs demonstrated a 10.83-fold increase in dissolution efficiency and a 6.07-fold reduction in mean dissolution time (MDT) [40]. In contrast, mannitol-based SDs (1:5 drug-to-carrier ratio) exhibited optimal dissolution performance due to improved wettability and hydrogen bonding [100]. In addition, as shown in Table 2, Pluronic® F68-based SDs for immediate release could achieve 4.04-fold higher dissolution efficiency and a 6.6-fold faster release rate [101], whereas PVP K30-based SDs could reach 95.87–100% dissolution, providing substantial improvement in bioavailability [20].

4.1.2. Fast-Dissolving Tablets for Rapid Drug Absorption

Fast-dissolving tablets (FDTs), which rapidly disintegrate in the mouth, offer a convenient approach for immediate drug absorption without the need for water, particularly beneficial for elderly patients who are more susceptible to DCN’s GI side effects. While FDTs provide rapid disintegration and enhanced ease of administration, the improved dissolution and bioavailability reported in the literature are influenced not only by the FDT platform but also by the solubility-enhancing excipients incorporated into these formulations [39,101,102]. As reported in an investigation, a formulation of Pluronic® F68-based FDTs exhibited a 4.04-fold increase in dissolution efficiency and a 6.6-fold faster drug release [101]. While PEG 8000 and Sorbitol-based FDTs enhanced bioavailability by 2.66-fold compared to commercial DCN capsules and also reduced gastrointestinal irritation—effects that may be partially attributed to the solubilizing action of PEG 8000 [39]. Additionally, FDTs formulated with Crospovidone and Camphor achieved rapid disintegration and followed first-order drug release kinetics, making them particularly suitable for patients with swallowing difficulties [102]. However, the observed benefits of the mentioned FDT delivery systems might arise from a combination of rapid disintegration and the physicochemical properties of incorporated excipients.

4.1.3. Immediate-Release and Gastro-Retentive Formulations

Immediate-release (IR) and gastro-retentive (GR) formulations are designed to modify drug dissolution and absorption kinetics, thereby optimizing systemic exposure. Mandawgade et al. investigated an IR formulation of DCN using microparticle-based sugar spheres to increase surface area compared to the commercial capsule Art®50. They reported that the IR formulation achieved 90% drug release within one hour, significantly higher than Art®50 (75%), leading to a 1.7-fold increase in the area under the curve from 0–6 h (AUC0–6h) in both in vitro and in vivo evaluations [103]. Conversely, the GR formulation, which incorporated a floating polymer blend to prolong gastric retention and slow the conversion of Diacerein to rhein, achieved 96% drug release within two hours and a 1.2-fold increase in AUC0–6h. This slower and more controlled release profile resulted in a reduced and attenuated systemic rhein peak compared with the commercial product, thereby lowering the likelihood of sharp gastrointestinal exposure, which is strongly associated with DCN-induced diarrhea. Clinical data further confirmed that compared with Art®50, the IR and GR formulations produced 1.7-fold and 1.2-fold increases in AUC0–6h, respectively, while the GR system generated a smoother plasma profile with lower maximum rhein concentrations [101], a factor that may contribute to reduced GI side effects [103].

4.1.4. Matrix-Based Controlled-Release Tablets for Prolonged Action

Matrix-based controlled-release formulations regulate drug release kinetics, maintaining steady plasma concentrations and reducing dosing frequency. Kabir et al. reported that Methocel K100M and K4M-based matrix tablets sustained drug release for up to eight hours, thereby improving patient compliance [104]. Furthermore, the optimized asymmetric osmotic pump tablets (Opadry® CA-coated) provided a controlled and highly linear release pattern over a 24-h period, consistent with zero-order kinetics (R2 = 0.977). The formulation demonstrated an initial release phase influenced by the incorporated ternary solid dispersion—showing approximately 79% drug dissolution within the first hour—followed by a sustained and uniform release profile throughout the remaining period, ultimately enhancing bioavailability and minimizing plasma concentration fluctuations [3].

4.1.5. Microsphere-Based Formulations for Sustained Absorption

Microsphere-based drug delivery also provides controlled release, reducing GI side effects and ensuring prolonged therapeutic efficacy. DCN-loaded microspheres coated with ethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) could increase the Tmax from 2.67 h to 4 h, thereby extending systemic absorption [105]. Additionally, fluid-bed coated microspheres exhibited a prolonged Tmax and controlled drug release, with an entrapment efficiency (EE) of 61% [105].
Various physical strategies such as solid dispersions, fast-dissolving tablets, microspheres, and matrix-based systems have been developed to improve dissolution and absorption of DCN. These approaches are summarized in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Physical modification strategies used to enhance diacerein’s solubility and oral bioavailability. The figure illustrates key platform categories, including solid dispersions that improve wettability and dissolution, fast-dissolving tablets designed for rapid disintegration and absorption, microsphere-based matrices enabling sustained release through gradual diffusion, matrix-controlled tablets that provide prolonged action via surface or bulk erosion, and gastro-retentive systems that extend gastric residence time to optimize dissolution and absorption.

4.2. Physicochemical Strategies for Enhancing DCN Solubility

Physicochemical modifications, as well as complexation strategies, have been developed to enhance dissolution, modify crystallinity, and improve stability. These approaches aim to optimize drug absorption, stabilize DCN against hydrolysis, and modify drug release profiles for controlled or immediate action [4,7,62,74,106,107]. Representative strategies are illustrated in Figure 4. This section discusses these various modification techniques, their mechanisms of action, and their comparative effectiveness, as summarized in Table 3.
Figure 4. Key physicochemical strategies for improving diacerein performance, including cyclodextrin complexation, pharmaceutical co-crystallization, and ionic liquid-based systems, all aimed at enhancing solubility and overall bioavailability.
Table 3. Comparative analysis of physicochemical strategies for DCN enhancement.

4.2.1. Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexation for Enhanced Solubility and Stability

Inclusion complexation, particularly with cyclodextrins (CDs), is a well-established technique to overcome limitations of hydrophobic drugs. CDs are cyclic glucose oligomers that form water-soluble complexes with a wide range of guest molecules, owing to their hydrophilic exterior and relatively hydrophobic cavity. Their biocompatibility, low toxicity, and non-immunogenic nature make them highly attractive carriers in pharmaceutical formulations [108].
Studies have shown that DCN can be effectively complexed with CDs, such as hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) and β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), resulting in significantly improved aqueous solubility and dissolution rates [4,7]. Both studies consistently demonstrated a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio between DCN and the respective cyclodextrins, confirming the formation of stable inclusion complexes [4,7]. Petralito et al. confirmed complex formation with HP-β-CD in both solution and solid-state through spectroscopic analyses, showing enhanced solubility and hydrolytic resistance [7]. DCN-HPβCD complexes were prepared using four methods: physical mixture, kneading, co-evaporation, and freeze-drying. Among these, freeze-drying produced the best results, achieving 100% drug dissolution in 5 min compared to only 55% in 60 min for pure DCN. Additionally, Characterization confirmed stable complex formation with reduced crystallinity, enhanced wettability, and 50% improvement in chemical stability [7]. Similarly, another study reported that DCN–β-CD and DCN–HPβCD complexes also followed a 1:1 host–guest stoichiometry, with HPβCD-based complexes increasing solubility to 4.36 mg/mL—substantially higher than the 3.197 mg/L of unmodified DCN—and achieving 99.95% release within 60 min [4]. These findings support CD inclusion as a promising approach for fast-disintegrating oral formulations.
Phase solubility studies have demonstrated that both β-CD and HPβCD form stable 1:1 inclusion complexes with DCN, with HPβCD showing higher complexation efficiency. Various preparative techniques—ranging from physical mixing to evaporation, kneading, and precipitation—have been employed. Characterization using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD) confirmed the predominantly amorphous state of DCN within these complexes, thereby facilitating enhanced dissolution profiles [4,90,109]. Recent innovations include the development of cyclodextrin metal–organic frameworks (CD-MOFs), which provide eco-friendly and biocompatible platforms for drug delivery, owning to their high specific surface area, porosity, and facile fabrication methods [110].

4.2.2. Co-Crystal and Eutectic Formation for Enhanced Bioavailability

Co-crystallization and eutectic formation modify drug crystallinity, resulting in faster dissolution and improved pharmacokinetics. DCN was co-crystallized with 2,4-dihydroxy benzoic acid (DHA) and fumaric acid (FMA) using a mechanochemical grinding method, forming a stable multi-component crystalline phase [106]. PXRD and DSC analyses confirmed reduced crystallinity, improved dissolution in citrate buffer (pH 6.0), and increased GI absorption [106]. Similarly, eutectic formulations of DCN showed enhanced pharmacokinetic properties through altering crystallinity to improve dissolution, as validated through a Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography bioanalytical method [107]. Another co-crystallization strategy involved β-resorcylic acid via antisolvent crystallization, yielding a 1:3 DCN:β-resorcylic acid cocrystal with superior mechanical properties [74]. This formulation significantly improved compactibility and compressibility, making it suitable for tablet formulations. Additionally, a 3.2-fold, increase in bioavailability was observed, confirming improved systemic absorption [74]. These findings highlight that co-crystals and eutectic formulations not only improve DCN physicochemical properties but also enhance mechanical characteristics, making them ideal for solid oral dosage forms.

4.2.3. Ionic Liquids for Stability and Ocular Drug Delivery

Ionic liquids (ILs) stabilize drug molecules, increase permeability, and improve retention in biological membranes. Using betaine-based (Bet6) and L-carnitine-based (Carn6) ILs, Grassiri et al. formulated DCN into stable nanoaggregates, significantly enhancing its solubility and systemic availability. These IL formulations significantly reduced DCN hydrolysis, extending its half-life and therapeutic action [62]. Additionally, their mucoadhesive properties enhanced ocular retention by preventing rapid drug elimination. Moreover, these ILs demonstrated antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, broadening their potential use in ocular anti-inflammatory therapies [62]. These combined advantages make IL formulations a promising approach for both oral and topical drug delivery.
As shown in Table 3, each of these modification strategies exhibited varying degrees of effectiveness for DCN.

4.3. Advanced Formulations by Route of Administration

This section is organized by route of administration. Non-oral systems are covered in Section 4.3.1, Section 4.3.2, Section 4.3.3, Section 4.3.4 and Section 4.3.6, whereas oral nanoformulations are consolidated in Section 4.3.5. This avoids overlap with earlier general mechanisms in Section 4.1 and Section 4.2. An overview of advanced nanocarrier-based strategies for diacerein delivery is illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Overview of advanced nanocarrier-based formulations developed for diacerein, including polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, niosomes/novasomes, micelles, and nanosuspensions, as well as topical gel and patch systems. These platforms aim to improve solubility, stability, targeted delivery, and overall therapeutic performance.

4.3.1. Vesicular Systems (Topical, Transdermal, Intra-Articular)

Various vesicle-based nanoformulations, including niosomes, bilosomes, novasomes, elastosomes, and hyaluosomes, have been explored to optimize topical, transdermal, and intra-articular delivery of DCN, improving therapeutic outcomes while minimizing systemic side effects. Among recent advances, surfactant-based drug delivery systems have emerged as pivotal tools. Due to their unique amphiphilic structure, comprising both hydrophilic and lipophilic segments, surfactants are highly versatile and have been incorporated into nearly all dosage forms to enhance drug absorption. This capability has spurred extensive research, positioning surfactants as a key player in addressing the challenges of low aqueous solubility [6,111,112].
The adsorption of surfactant molecules from the liquid phase onto solid surfaces is mainly driven by electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions (physical adsorption); However, in some instances, chemical bonds may also form. When this adsorption results in the formation of ordered structures—ranging from monolayers to complex multilayer assemblies—it is often called surface self-assembly. Similarly, in bulk liquids, self-assembly gives rise to the formation of micelles, vesicles, and other higher-order structures [113]. For instance, Pluronic® F127 has been evaluated as a solubilizing agent in SDs of DCN, which demonstrated its potential as an effective carrier for improving the drug’s dissolution profile [6].
To address the delivery challenges posed by DCN, surfactant-based formulations have been extensively investigated as effective vesicular drug delivery systems for enhancing solubility, permeability, and controlled drug release [6]. These surfactant-based vesicles provide protection from enzymatic degradation, improved systemic absorption, and reduced GI side effects. Multifarious topical, transdermal, and oral formulations have been developed, each tailored to optimize the drug’s pharmacokinetic profile and therapeutic potential [15,60,114].
Niosomal Formulations
Topical niosomal formulations have demonstrated promising results in treating psoriasis and OA by enhancing drug retention within target tissues, reducing systemic absorption, and prolonging anti-inflammatory activity [115,116]. Moghddam et al. developed a Span 60-based niosomal gel containing DCN for the management of psoriasis. This formulation achieved 83.02% EE with vesicle sizes of 477.8 nm, ensuring deep skin penetration. Franz diffusion studies confirmed a flux of 2.820 μg/cm2/h, and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy demonstrated drug localization within epidermal layers (30–90 µm depth), supporting sustained therapeutic effects [1]. Similarly, a niosomal gel of DCN for OA treatment, prepared via thin-film hydration (THF) and sonication, achieved 9.52–58.43% EE and controlled drug release over 8 h, optimizing localized retention. Box–Behnken experimental design confirmed surfactant concentration and charge-inducing agents as critical factors influencing vesicle dispersion and drug release [60].
Aziz and co-workers optimized a transdermal niosomal formulation of DCN, prepared via THF, using a three-level central composite design for RA treatment. The optimized formulation achieved 95.63% EE of DCN and vesicle sizes of 436.65 nm, ensuring enhanced penetration and stable vesicular dispersion. Ex vivo permeation studies demonstrated significantly improved drug retention within the skin layers, effectively reducing systemic exposure while maintaining prolonged therapeutic action [117].
For oral administration, niosomal encapsulation strategies protect DCN from enzymatic hydrolysis, improve dissolution rates, and facilitate sustained drug release, thereby enhancing systemic bioavailability. A THF-based niosomal formulation of DCN, incorporating Span 20, Span 60, and cholesterol, achieved an EE of 74.09%, with vesicle sizes 0.5–2.6 µm. The optimized formulation exhibited 93.24% drug release within 60 min, significantly improving absorption for the management of OA [50]. In addition, reverse-phase evaporation niosomes containing DCN extended the T50% (time to release 50% of the DCN) up to 10 h, following zero-order kinetic release (R2 = 0.9834), providing prolonged systemic exposure and reduced dosing frequency [118].
To accelerate dissolution rates, ultrasonic processing of niosomes was introduced as an eco-friendly alternative, producing smaller vesicles (154–405 nm) with an EE of 82.6% EE for DCN, thereby enhancing drug absorption [42]. Additionally, stability-enhanced niosomal formulations confirmed structural integrity and resistance to enzymatic degradation, supporting prolonged systemic retention [53]. Furthermore, Khan et al. studied a THF-based niosomal formulation of DCN using sorbitan monolaurate and poloxamer 184, which achieved an EE of 90.5%, with particle sizes ranging from 350–1000 nm, ensuring gradual drug release and reduced GI irritation [41].
Other Types of Vesicular Systems
Bilosomes, modified niosomal vesicles, incorporate bile salts as edge activators to improve vesicle deformability and penetration [119]. Aziz et al. investigated a THF-based formulation containing DCN for topical application, followed by sonication, which resulted in 100% EE with a vesicle size of 301.65 nm, facilitating superior absorption and retention. ex vivo permeation studies also confirmed enhanced drug transport through the skin, offering a promising alternative to oral DCN, which is limited by first-pass metabolism and hepatic degradation, particularly in older patients [54].
Novasomes, nano-vesicles consisting of free fatty acid, offer improved transdermal drug bioavailability [120]. A novasome formulation containing DCN was formulated using Span 60, cholesterol, and stearic acid. The optimized formulation achieved an EE of 69.415% with a vesicle size of 275.2 nm, ensuring deep tissue penetration for transdermal delivery in the management of OA [114]. Additional studies optimized the cholesterol-to-surfactant ratio, identifying 1:4 as the most efficient, leading to higher transdermal flux and reduced systemic toxicity [57].
Elastosomes, highly deformable non-ionic surfactant-based vesicles, incorporate edge activators such as Brij and Cremophor to enhance drug penetration and systemic retention [121]. Aziz and coworkers. developed a THF-based formulation with an EE 96.25%, representing the optimal DCN loading compared to the oral formulation for managing OA. The formulation exhibited a vesicle size of 506.35 nm and a deformability index of 12.74 g(DI), indicating high flexibility and superior absorption, and achieved a 19-fold increase in transdermal flux compared to conventional suspensions. Histopathological analysis confirmed its non-irritant nature, ensuring safe application for OA treatment [76].
Hyaluosomes, which are hyaluronic acid-based liposomes, can enhance local retention and control release [122]. These were developed by Eladawy et al. for a dual-function platform of intra-articular drug delivery, specifically for OA treatment [8]. The optimized formulation exhibited a particle size of 310 nm, 90.7% EE of DCN, and a zeta potential of −12.2 mV, ensuring colloidal stability and extended joint retention for OA. This delivery system of DCN provided sustained drug release over 48 h (48% retention vs. rapid systemic clearance in oral formulations), reducing joint inflammation and cartilage degradation for in vivo OA models. The significant decrease in TNF-α and IL-1β levels in this system confirmed its strong anti-inflammatory effects, supporting its therapeutic application in OA management [8]. A summary of the formulation parameters and therapeutic advantages of these vesicular nanoformulations is presented in Table 4.
Table 4. Comparative analysis of vesicular drug delivery systems for DCN.
As shown in Table 4, nano-vesicular carriers offer significant potential for improving DCN bioavailability, targeted delivery, and sustained therapeutic effects across various administration routes.

4.3.2. Emulsion and Gel-Based Systems (Topical/Transdermal)

Nanoemulgels, microemulgels, and nanogels serve as stable and efficient drug delivery platforms, optimizing topical and transdermal administration for the treatment of inflammatory disease [122,123,124]. Kazi et al. explored the potential of nanoemulgels, which integrate nanoemulsions into a hydrogel matrix to ensure deep skin penetration and sustained release of DCN. This nanoemulsion-based system, formulated with Carbopol 940, Triacetin: Capmul MCM C8 (2:1 w/w), and Kolliphor EL:Transcutol-P (1:1 w/w), achieved over 90% EE and a mean globule size of 10.7 nm, promoting rapid skin penetration and enhanced solubility [25]. Another investigation confirmed that controlled release formulations of DCN led to improved absorption, reduced systemic fluctuations, and decreased dosing frequency. This alternative nanoemulgel delivery system, incorporating oleic acid (8–12%), Tween 80 (10–15%), and propylene glycol (15–25%), demonstrated 93.61% DCN release over 24 h, with a flux of 0.574 µg/cm2/h, ensuring extended therapeutic action [21].
Microemulgels were formulated by Pawbake et al. using Capmul MCM C8 (oil), Labrasol (surfactant), and ethanol (cosurfactant), exhibiting high thermodynamic stability and enhanced DCN permeation. A central composite design was employed to optimize the superior formulation, achieving 95% drug release within 8 h, confirming efficient solubilization and diffusion [125].
Nanogels containing DCN, formulated using Carbopol 940 and Eudragit RSPO, were developed via the emulsion solvent diffusion technique, which revealed improved stability and penetration for the topical treatment of arthritis. Following Higuchi’s diffusion-controlled model, the optimized formulation exhibited a particle size of 190.3 nm, an EE OF 83.51%, and a DCN release of 90.13% over 24 h. Ex vivo permeation and in vivo studies in the Freund’s Adjuvant Arthritis model further confirmed significant anti-arthritic efficacy, indicating that these nanogels represent a promising transdermal alternative to conventional oral formulations [56]. A summary of the formulation characteristics and therapeutic benefits of these nano-based gels is presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Comparative analysis of emulsion and gel-based nanoformulations for DCN.
These emulsion- and gel-based systems offer diverse advantages, positioning them as promising alternatives for topical and transdermal DCN therapy.

4.3.3. Lipid-Based Nanoformulations (Topical & Intra-Articular)

This subsection covers lipid carriers used primarily for topical and intra-articular delivery (e.g., lipid carriers (NLCs), solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), liposomes) to enhance local retention and reduce systemic side effects. Comparative details remain in Table 6. Pawbake and co-workers developed NLC-based gels for topical OA treatment and demonstrated sustained release of DCN over 24 h. They reported enhanced localized retention and anti-inflammatory effects of these gels [23]. Another study, SLNs were formulated using cetyl alcohol (2%) and Tween 80 (0.9%) for oral encapsulation of DCN, which exhibited long-term stability (6 months) and reduced GI side effects, particularly diarrhea, the main clinical limitation of using DCN [126]. Chondroitin sulfate (ChS)-modified SLNs were also designed for intra-articular injections by Jain et al. These formulated SLN could increase cartilage targeting, as long as they sustain drug release for 16 h, in addition to improving rhein retention at the joint site (7.8 ± 1.23 μg/mL vs. 2.9 ± 0.45 μg/mL for free drug) [38].
Table 6. Comparative analysis of lipid-based nanoformulations for DCN.
Liposomes and proliposomes were widely studied for both oral and transdermal administration [127,128,129,130]. Shah et al. developed a liposomal gel formulation that enhanced the skin penetration of DCN by 3.5-fold and improved systemic absorption [24]. In addition, proliposome-based controlled-release tablets composing of Eudragit RS100 and ethyl cellulose achieved 91.13% DCN entrapment and sustained drug release (46.7% over 12 h), suggesting superior pharmacokinetics compared to conventional DCN capsules [70].
A comparative evaluation of various lipid-based nanoformulations of DCN is presented in Table 6. As discussed, these lipid-based formulations represent promising delivery strategies for DCN.

4.3.4. Injectable and Targeted Delivery Systems

Injectable and targeted drug delivery systems enhance localized retention, controlled release, and therapeutic efficacy for intra-articular OA treatment. These systems improve cartilage targeting while reducing systemic side effects and the need for frequent dosing [131,132,133].
Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) microparticles were developed using emulsion-solvent evaporation, which encapsulated rhein with an EE of 63.8%. This formulation ensured biphasic drug release (45% within 24 h, followed by sustained release over 30 days). In vitro anti-inflammatory analysis confirmed significant reductions in IL-1β and reactive oxygen species levels, highlighting the therapeutic potential of PLGA microparticles [52].
Ali et al. developed surface-modified iron oxide microparticles containing DCN, coated with chitosan and hydrolyzed collagen. This delivery system facilitated localized joint retention with high EE value (85.25%) and a sustained release profile, minimizing systemic toxicity. The magnetic targeting capabilities of the formulation resulted in precise drug localization, along with reduced TNF-α and IL-1β levels and enhanced cartilage regeneration [59].
Chondroitin sulfate-modified SLNs (ChS-DC-SLNs) were also designed by Jain et al. for intra-articular injections. This formulation enhanced cartilage targeting and provided sustained drug release for up to 16 h. ChS-DC-SLNs achieved a high EE (93.8%) and significantly improved intra-articular drug retention. Compared to uncoated SLNs (4.62 μg/mL) and free drug (2.9 μg/mL), ChS-modified SLNs demonstrated rhein retention of 7.8 μg/mL at the joint site, resulting in 2.8-fold higher bioavailability and superior cartilage protection [38].
A comparative evaluation of various intra-articular drug delivery systems for DCN is presented in Table 7.
Table 7. Comparative analysis of injectable and targeted drug delivery systems for DCN.

4.3.5. Oral Nano-Formulations of DCN

As detailed earlier (Section 4.1, Section 4.2 and Section 4.3), multiple nano-enabled oral systems—nanosuspensions, SNEDDS, and polymeric/pH-responsive carriers—have been investigated to overcome DCN’s dissolution limits and enzymatic degradation [134]. To avoid redundancy with prior mechanistic descriptions, this subsection focuses on DCN-specific oral outcomes, with a concise comparison in Table 8.
Nanosuspensions
Nanosuspensions utilize reduced particle size to increase poorly soluble drugs’ surface area and dissolution rate of poorly soluble drugs [135]. Elsayed et al. developed a hybrid bottom-up/top-down approach, combining high-pressure homogenization and precipitation techniques, to prepare DCN nanosuspensions. Optimized formulations incorporated sodium deoxycholate and sodium dodecyl sulfate, resulting in a significant improvement in DCN dissolution. The best-performing formulation exhibited a 2.23-fold increase in solubility and achieved complete drug dissolution during 1.26 min, compared to 13.65 min for coarse DCN. Pharmacokinetic evaluations also confirmed a 131.4% increase in bioavailability, with a higher peak plasma concentration (Cmax = 3.8 µg/mL compared to 2.0 µg/mL for commercial formulations of DCN) and faster absorption (Tmax = 1.2 h vs. 1.7 h). These findings support the potential of nanosuspension formulations to delivery of DCN [51].
Additionally, a coated nanosuspension was investigated to improve mucoadhesion and drug stability. The formulation was prepared using sonoprecipitation followed by lyophilization, with PVP serving as a stabilizer. The chitosan coating enhanced permeability and sustained drug release, achieving an EE of 95.63% and a particle size of 145.4 nm. Ex vivo studies showed increased mucoadhesion and prolonged absorption, leading to a 172.1% higher relative bioavailability than conventional DCN suspensions [49].
Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems
Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) have emerged as a promising alternative for lipophilic drugs. These isotropic formulations form oil-in-water emulsions upon gentle agitation in the GI tract, offering significant potential for improved drug delivery. The formation of such emulsions facilitates the drug in a solubilized form, and the resulting small droplet size yields a large interfacial area that favors drug absorption [136]. SEDDS formulations typically consist of a blend of lipids (natural or synthetic), nonionic surfactants having high hydrophilic–lipophilic balance values (e.g., Tween 80, Ethoxylated polyglycolide glyceride), and hydrophilic cosolvents/emulsifiers. Although the number of surfactants approved for oral use is relatively limited, nonionic surfactants are preferred due to their lower toxicity and rapid self-emulsifying efficiency [137,138].
DCN was incorporated into a self-nanoemulsifying system, ternary phase diagrams were constructed using oils such as Capryol™90, Miglyol®812, and isopropyl myristate, combined with surfactants (Tween®80 and Tween®20) and cosurfactants (PEG 200 and PEG 300) [93].
A SNEDDS formulation for rhein was optimized using medium-chain triglycerides (Capmul MCM C8) as the oil phase, with Labrasol and Transcutol-P as surfactants and co-surfactants. The optimized SNEDDS exhibited a droplet size of 42.3 nm, leading to complete drug release within 30 min and enhanced systemic absorption. These formulations effectively prevented drug precipitation, improved GI solubility, and minimized dose variability [48].
pH-Responsive Hydrogels and Polymeric Microspheres
Biopolymers, derived from natural sources or biological systems, offer a versatile and sustainable option for pharmaceutical formulations owing to their biodegradability, availability, and tunable physicochemical properties [139]. Their unique features have garnered interest in composite materials, where natural fibers frequently serve as reinforcement within biodegradable matrices, yielding entirely environmentally friendly composites [140].
Several studies have investigated the use of biopolymers to improve therapeutic performance in DCN delivery. For instance, GR drug delivery systems have been formulated using swellable polymers such as HPMC K100M and PEO, combined with chitosan and carbopol, to achieve extended therapeutic action [141].
Haseeb et al. explored stimuli-responsive hydrogels and polymeric microspheres for controlled DCN release. These hydrogels minimized gastric degradation and improved sustained absorption in the intestine [61]. Linseed hydrogel-based tablets were fabricated using rhamnogalacturonan polysaccharides to respond to pH-dependent conditions. This formulation prevented premature DCN release in gastric conditions (pH 1.2) and enhanced drug release in intestinal pH (6.8–7.4), thereby ensuring sustained absorption of DCN. The porous nature of the hydrogel structure increased DCN’s hydration and dispersion. It also protected DCN from early conversion to rhein, thereby reducing GI irritation and improving therapeutic efficacy [61].
In another approach, acrylic acid-based pH-responsive polymeric hydrogels containing DCN were formulated to enhance swelling and control drug diffusion. Optimized formulations demonstrated improvement in DCN release in an in vitro study (at pH 7.4), effectively preventing dose dumping and prolonging therapeutic effects [142]. Microsphere formulations using sodium alginate and chitosan as polymeric carriers were also developed via ionotropic gelation, resulting in slow DCN diffusion and continuous DCN retention. The optimized formulation (sodium alginate: chitosan = 1:3) exhibited the lowest release rate with stable drug entrapment [143]. Additionally, DCN-loaded microspheres crosslinked with calcium chloride showed fewer adverse effects [143]. Roy et al. fabricated microspheres containing DCN to evaluate their efficacy in an induced arthritis model in Sprague Dawley rats that showed improved joint function, reduced inflammation, decreased peak plasma concentrations, and reduced GI side effects associated with DCN use [144]. Furthermore, DCN-loaded microspheres prepared by ionotropic gelation using polymers like sodium alginate and chitosan, crosslinked with calcium chloride, led to fewer adverse effects [143].
Table 8 briefly shows the key pharmacokinetic properties and solubility enhancements achieved by nanosuspensions, SNEDDS, and polymeric delivery systems, highlighting the effectiveness of various nanoformulation techniques.
Table 8. Comparative analysis of oral nanoformulations for DCN.

4.3.6. Dissolving Microneedles for Percutaneous Drug Delivery

Recently, dissolving microneedles have gained significant attention as a minimally invasive approach for enhancing transdermal drug delivery. These systems create microchannels in the skin, enabling rapid absorption of active agents with reduced systemic side effects [145,146]. Shabbir and coworkers investigated a DCN micro-suspension that was incorporated into HPMC and PVP microneedle matrices for effective percutaneous delivery. The microneedles dissolved within 5 min, releasing 74.39% of the DCN within 24 h. Thermal analysis studies confirmed that the amorphous state of DCN led to improved dissolution. In vivo results using a carrageenan-induced paw edema model also demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory effects and highlighted the therapeutic potential of these dissolving microneedles [58].
Another study investigated microneedle-assisted delivery of an SD of DCN. DCN was pre-treated with Polysorbate 80 or formulated as a PEG 4000-based dispersion before being incorporated into lyophilized HPMC/PVP microneedles to enhance solubility. In vitro results showed that microneedles dissolved rapidly and formed aqueous microchannels, resulting in a 2.43-fold increase in transdermal DCN delivery. It was also reported that over 98% of the drug was absorbed within 24 h. These results indicate that this delivery system significantly improved bioavailability and ensured sustained drug action [147]. Table 9 summarizes the details of microneedle-based delivery systems of DCN.
Table 9. Comparative analysis of microneedle-based delivery systems for DCN.

4.4. Enhancing DCN’s Therapeutic Effects Through Synergistic Strategies

Optimizing DCN’s efficacy through synergistic drug combinations has been shown to be a promising way to improve bioavailability, reduce systemic toxicity, and target multiple disease pathways. These combination strategies can include co-administered compounds, lipid-based carriers, nanoemulsion-based formulations, and hydrogels. The outcomes of such synergistic strategies have shown potential benefits in treating neurodegenerative diseases, psoriasis, RA, and OA. Sharma et al. investigated a neuroprotective combined formulation of Adenium obesum extract with DCN for Parkinson’s disease and depression. The extract, known for its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, enhanced the effects of DCN, leading to reduced neuronal degeneration, improved hippocampal structure, and improved motor coordination. Antioxidant assays also showed increased resistance to oxidative stress, further supporting its potential role for neurodegeneration therapy applications [2].
A transferosomal hydrogel loaded with DCN and berberine HCl was developed for topical application. This hydrogel enhanced drug retention, penetration, and anti-inflammatory effects. Also, the formulation showed sustained release (88.44% DCN, 81.56% berberine HCl over 24 h) and significantly reduced epidermal thickness and inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-17A) [148]. A dual-drug transferosomal system using sodium deoxycholate as an edge activator further improved skin penetration and stability. The optimized formulation (a particle size of 110.9 nm, and 91.23% DCN EE) showed enhanced dermal absorption and maintained stability for three months [149].
El-Refaie et al. designed an SLN containing rhein and methotrexate to improve joint targeting and reduce systemic toxicity in the treatment of RA. This nanoformulation (a particle size of ~192 nm, 93% drug EE) showed controlled release (~48% over 24 h) and significantly reduced TNF-α and IL-1β levels. The results suggest this combined strategy offers superior anti-inflammatory effects compared to free drugs [150]. Another study on a binary SLN system (stearic acid, lauric acid, oleic acid) revealed sustained release over 72 h, with temperature-sensitive acceleration at 40 °C for joint-targeted therapy. Gold nanoparticles were incorporated into this SLN system to further reduce inflammation, showing effective cartilage protection in in vivo models [28].
Chattopadhyay and coworkers developed a nanoemulsion-based hydrogel (composed of soybean oil, Tween 80, and poloxamer 407) for transdermal glucosamine-DCN delivery. In vitro results showed stable nanoemulsion formation (81.95 nm, zeta potential: 39.33 mV). In vivo results also demonstrated reduced TNF-α, C-reactive protein, and inflammatory markers, confirming strong chondroprotective effects of this formulation [55].
A clinical trial comparing a combination of chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine sulfate with DCN monotherapy in knee OA found a 71.01% pain reduction in the combination group versus 48.09% with DCN alone. This synergic system showed greater symptomatic relief and joint protection [63].
To summarize the advantages of different combination strategies, Table 10 presents the key pharmacokinetic improvements and therapeutic benefits discussed in this section.
Table 10. Comparative analysis of synergistic formulations and drug delivery systems for DCN.
However, future research can be designed on hybrid nanocarrier systems combined with other delivery methods. The integration of nanotechnology with polymeric and stimuli-responsive systems presents a promising strategy to optimize DCN’s anti-inflammatory clinical performance.

5. Clinical Potential of DCN in Novel Carriers and Formulations

Various formulations of DCN have demonstrated significant clinical potential for treating inflammatory disease. Following is a brief explanation of the most important clinical trial applications of DCN.
Clinical trials have investigated DCN in dermatological applications, particularly for psoriasis and EB. A clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03472287) evaluating 1% DCN ointment in EB reported significant improvements in blister reduction and skin barrier function [5]. Unlike in other dermatological conditions, EB patients did not experience issues with drug penetration, making sustained drug release a more critical factor than absorption, which this goal can be achieved with more novel drug delivery systems. This goal can be achieved with novel drug delivery systems. To enable continuous and controlled drug delivery, advanced-release formulations, such as lipid-based carriers and nanoemulgel-based systems, have been developed to provide prolonged skin retention while reducing the need for frequent application [25,114,117]. DCN has been widely orally investigated in OA trials, but its clinical efficacy has been limited by poor bioavailability and GI side effects. As mentioned, a clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01906801) has explored DCN as a monotherapy or in combination with glucosamine and diclofenac, showing positive effects on pain relief and joint function [151].
Osmotic-controlled release tablets, SD techniques, and chitosan-coated nanosuspensions have been investigated to improve DCN’s dissolution rates for OA treatment. These approaches have reported enhanced DCN bioavailability while minimizing GI irritation [3,6,49]. Advanced formulations such as PLGA microparticles, lipid-based, and SLN-based nanoparticles have demonstrated extended DCN release, increased joint retention, and reduced levels of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β), supporting their potential for long-term OA management [8,28,52].
DCN has also been explored in clinical trials for ocular conditions (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier:NCT04351100), particularly ocular surface disease and inflammation [152]. However, poor retention on the ocular surface and rapid clearance have limited its effectiveness in ophthalmic applications. Recent formulation advancements, such as IL-based eye drops, have improved DCN’s ocular retention and bioavailability, making it a promising candidate for chronic inflammatory eye diseases [62]. To provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical evaluation of Diacerein across various diseases, all registered clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically reviewed. As summarized in Table 11, at least 30 clinical studies have investigated Diacerein in diverse therapeutic domains, including osteoarthritis, metabolic inflammation, epidermolysis bullosa, ocular inflammatory disorders, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, and thrombocytopenia. These trials encompass Phase 1 to Phase 4 investigations and collectively highlight the drug’s broad therapeutic footprint and continued clinical relevance [27]. Integrating these clinical findings with formulation advancements underscores the importance of developing optimized delivery systems to fully harness the therapeutic potential of Diacerein. Future studies should focus on combining these synergic systems with clinical trial outcomes and regulatory approval processes to facilitate the commercialization of these optimized formulations.
Table 11. Comprehensive list of completed and ongoing ClinicalTrials.gov studies involving Diacerein [27].

6. Discussion

6.1. Regulatory and Clinical Translation Challenges

Despite its categorization as a SYSADOA, DCN remains unapproved by the U.S. FDA and is subject to restricted use by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) due to its significant adverse effects, particularly dose-dependent diarrhea, hepatotoxicity, and hyperkalemia in elderly patients (EMA, 2014 [153]). These regulatory barriers have motivated research efforts toward advanced formulation strategies that minimize systemic toxicity, improve site-specific delivery, and optimize pharmacokinetics [126].
Among these strategies, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) have demonstrated notable promise, with QbD-optimized oral formulations enhancing anti-inflammatory efficacy while reducing hepatic enzyme levels in preclinical models [126]. Likewise, niosomal gels for topical application have been designed to reduce gastrointestinal exposure while maintaining therapeutic efficacy at the site of action, showing favorable ex vivo permeation and in vivo anti-inflammatory outcomes [1,2,114,117,148,149]. More innovative approaches, such as self-dissolving microneedle-assisted percutaneous systems, have further enhanced therapeutic outcomes, as reported by Shabbir et al., who noted reduced paw edema and fewer diarrheal episodes compared to conventional oral formulations [147]. In addition, several combinational and hybrid strategies, where DCN is co-formulated with other bioactives or nanocarriers, have been proposed to achieve synergistic therapeutic effects across osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and neurodegenerative conditions. Representative examples are illustrated in Figure 6. Such hybrid approaches highlight future opportunities for enhancing both local efficacy and systemic tolerability of DCN therapies.
Figure 6. Examples of combinational and hybrid strategies involving diacerein, including gold-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for osteoarthritis, glucosamine-based nanoemulsions and hydrogels, berberine-loaded transferosomal gels for psoriasis, rhein–methotrexate SLNs for rheumatoid arthritis, and glucosamine–chondroitin oral formulations for enhanced pain relief.
Despite these advances, translation into clinical and industrial practice remains restricted. Most reported nanoformulations suffer from formulation complexity, scale-up challenges, and a lack of ICH-compliant stability studies (Q1A(R2)). In addition, standardized and validated bioanalytical methods for quantifying rhein in biological samples are scarce, limiting reproducibility across laboratories. Regulatory considerations also add layers of difficulty: many nanocarriers (e.g., microneedle systems, lipid–polymer hybrids) fall under drug–device combination categories, requiring dual regulatory evaluation and expanded toxicological profiling according to FDA nanotechnology guidance [154].
Another key limitation is the absence of late-phase clinical evidence. While numerous in vitro and in vivo studies have highlighted improved therapeutic efficacy, no diacerein nanoformulation has advanced beyond early-phase trials. This highlights the urgent need for harmonized regulatory frameworks, robust pharmacokinetic and toxicological modeling, and validated analytical pipelines. In particular, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models and advanced simulation tools could bridge the gap between preclinical efficacy and clinical translation by predicting dissolution, absorption, and systemic exposure across patient populations.
In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly recognized as transformative tools in the rational design and development of nanocarrier-based diacerein formulations. AI-driven Quality by Design (QbD) frameworks facilitate prediction and optimization of key formulation attributes—such as particle size, encapsulation efficiency, and release kinetics—through data-informed modeling [155,156]. ML models like artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs) have shown promise in enhancing formulation robustness and minimizing experimental iterations, especially for poorly water-soluble anti-inflammatory drugs [157,158]. More recently, AI-assisted physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has enabled the prediction of systemic exposure and biodistribution of nanoformulations, potentially bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical translation [159,160]. Moreover, ML-driven platforms such as Excipient Prediction Software (ExPreSo; a machine-learning framework trained on formulation data from 335 approved biopharmaceutical products for excipient prediction) offer opportunities for virtual screening of safe and efficient carriers tailored to the physicochemical properties of diacerein [161]. These technologies are anticipated to accelerate development timelines, reduce formulation variability, and support scalable, patient-tailored delivery systems.
To synthesize the comparative performance of DCN formulation strategies, physicochemical approaches (e.g., amorphization, co-crystals, and cyclodextrin complexation) primarily improve dissolution kinetics and hydrolytic stability. In contrast, nanocarrier-based platforms further enhance these improvements by facilitating enhanced membrane transport, prolonging intra-tissue retention, and enabling site-specific targeting. Integrating evidence from multiple studies suggests that no single formulation fully addresses all pharmacokinetic limitations of DCN; instead, a combined optimization of solubility, stability, permeability, and controlled release is required to achieve consistent therapeutic performance.
Given these mechanistic insights, emerging research should focus on hybrid or multifunctional systems that simultaneously address solubility, metabolic instability, and tissue-specific delivery. For example, combining amorphous solid dispersions with mucoadhesive nanoparticles, or co-crystal engineering with lipid-based nanocarriers, may provide more comprehensive control over both dissolution and systemic exposure. Additionally, the incorporation of predictive computational tools, including PBPK-guided formulation optimization, may significantly reduce translational uncertainty and streamline progression to clinical evaluation.
In summary, nanotechnology holds considerable potential to overcome the long-standing pharmacokinetic and safety limitations of DCN. However, successful clinical and industrial deployment will depend on addressing several unmet needs: (i) establishing validated bioanalytical protocols for rhein and DCN metabolites, (ii) developing scalable and reproducible manufacturing workflows, (iii) implementing ICH-compliant stability programs, and (iv) integrating computational and translational modeling with early-phase clinical design. These strategic developments, alongside robust clinical trials, will be essential to advance diacerein nanoformulations from experimental innovation to practical therapeutic reality.

6.2. Comparative Performance of Diacerein Formulation Strategies

The comparative overview in Table 12 demonstrates that physical modification strategies—such as solid dispersions, nanosuspensions, and certain amorphization-based approaches—primarily enhance dissolution rate and wettability, leading to moderate improvements in bioavailability. These enhancements result mainly from reduced crystallinity, improved particle–solvent interactions, and increased surface area. In contrast, true physicochemical strategies—including co-crystals, cyclodextrin inclusion complexes, and eutectic systems—provide more robust improvements in solubility and hydrolytic stability by altering the molecular environment of diacerein through intermolecular interactions and host–guest complexation. Nanocarrier-based systems (niosomes, bilosomes, elastosomes, SLNs, NLCs, hyaluosomes, microneedle-assisted platforms) extend these benefits by enabling superior membrane permeation, enhanced tissue retention, reduced gastrointestinal exposure, and—in several studies—attenuation of diarrhea and systemic toxicity. These carriers consistently demonstrated improved anti-inflammatory, chondroprotective, and pharmacokinetic outcomes in vivo. Hybrid delivery systems, such as dual-drug nanoparticles or co-delivery transferosomes, exhibited synergistic therapeutic effects through simultaneous modulation of complementary inflammatory pathways and improved targeting efficiency. Collectively, these data confirm that no single formulation platform resolves all biopharmaceutical limitations of diacerein. Instead, the most promising approach appears to be combining solubility enhancement with controlled release and tissue targeting to achieve consistent therapeutic performance and translational potential.
Table 12. Comparative Summary of Diacerein Formulation Strategies and Their Functional Outcomes.

7. Future Directions and Conclusions

Research on DCN is progressing rapidly, offering numerous opportunities to enhance its pharmacokinetic profile, therapeutic efficacy, and patient adherence through advanced delivery strategies. In this review, both physicochemical modification strategies and nano-enabled delivery platforms were comparatively evaluated to clarify how each contributes to solubility enhancement, hydrolytic stability, permeability, and controlled release. Looking forward, several priorities can be identified. First, lipid-based carriers and hybrid vesicular systems should be refined for improved stability, controlled release, and disease-specific targeting. Compared with purely physicochemical approaches, these advanced carriers show superior benefits in enhancing membrane permeation and reducing colonic hydrolysis, making them among the most promising candidates for translational development. Combining these nanocarriers with penetration enhancers or bioactive peptides may enhance local action while reducing systemic toxicity. Second, oral formulations require further optimization to address the persistent challenges of low bioavailability and gastrointestinal irritation. Future work should focus on developing controlled-release platforms, optimizing polymer selection for solid dispersions, and validating computational models such as PBPK to guide dose adjustments across diverse patient populations. Third, alternative delivery routes—including ocular, intra-articular, and transdermal systems—hold significant potential for improving local drug retention and therapeutic outcomes. Rigorous preclinical validation and long-term clinical studies will be critical to confirm their safety and efficacy. Finally, computational and molecular modeling approaches should be integrated with experimental research to streamline formulation design, predict drug–drug interactions, and guide regulatory readiness. These tools can also help bridge mechanistic insights with clinical applicability, addressing a key gap identified across current DCN research.
Overall, DCN remains a valuable anti-inflammatory and disease-modifying drug. By aligning physicochemical optimization with advanced nanotechnology and supporting these developments with robust analytical, regulatory, and clinical frameworks, next-generation DCN therapies can achieve improved efficacy, reduced adverse effects, and broader clinical adoption in the management of inflammatory and degenerative diseases.

Funding

This work was supported by Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran (401400045). All authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AA: Acrylic Acid; AI: Artificial Intelligence; ANN: Artificial Neural Network; API: Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient; AUC: Area Under the Curve; AUC0–6h: Area Under the Curve from 0 to 6 h; BCS: Biopharmaceutics Classification System; β-CD: Beta-Cyclodextrin; Bet6: Betaine-Based Ionic Liquid; Carn6: L-Carnitine-Based Ionic Liquid; Carbopol 934/940: Polyacrylic Acid-Based Gelling Agent; CAT: Catalase; CCD: Central Composite Design; CD: Cyclodextrin; CD-MOFs: Cyclodextrin-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks; ChS: Chondroitin Sulfate; ChS-DC-SLNs: Chondroitin Sulfate-Modified Diacerein-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles; Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration; CMC: Carboxymethyl Cellulose; COX: Cyclooxygenase; COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019; CR: Controlled Release; CRP/Hs-CRP: (High-sensitivity) C-Reactive Protein; CS-DNS: Chitosan-Coated Diacerein Nanosuspension; DCN: Diacerein; DI: Deformability Index; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; DHA: 2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic Acid; DSC: Differential Scanning Calorimetry; EB/EBS: (Simplex) Epidermolysis Bullosa; EE/EE%: Entrapment Efficiency; EMA: European Medicines Agency; ERS: Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress; Ethyl Cellulose: Hydrophobic Polymer for Controlled Release; Ex vivo: Outside a Living Organism; Ethanol/Propylene Glycol/Transcutol-P: Penetration Enhancers/Co-surfactants; ExPreSo: Excipient Prediction Software; FDA/USFDA: United States Food and Drug Administration; FDT/ODTs: (Orally) Fast-Dissolving Tablets; FESEM: Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy; FMA: Fumaric Acid; FTIR: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy; GI: Gastrointestinal; GR/IR/SR: Gastro-Retentive/Immediate-Release/Sustained-Release; GSH: Glutathione; HA: Hyaluronic Acid; HCl: Hydrochloride; Higuchi Model: Drug Release Kinetic Model; HMGB1: High Mobility Group Box 1; HPH: High-Pressure Homogenization; HPLC/RP-HPLC: (Reversed-Phase) High-Performance Liquid Chromatography; HPMC: Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose; HPβCD/HP-β-CD: Hydroxypropyl-Beta-Cyclodextrin; ICH: International Council for Harmonisation; IL/ILs: Ionic Liquids/Interleukins (Context-dependent); IL-1β/IL-12/IL-17A/IL-23: Interleukins 1β, 12, 17A, 23; In vivo: Within a Living Organism; Intra-articular: Injection into Joint Space; IR: Immediate-Release; ITP: Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura; Labrasol/Kolliphor EL/Tween 80: Nonionic Surfactants; Lecithin–Cholesterol: Liposomal Stabilizing Agents; LPO: Lipid Peroxidation; MAFLD: Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease; MCP-1: Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1; MDT: Mean Dissolution Time; min/h/°C: Minute/Hour/Degree Celsius; ML: Machine Learning; MTX: Methotrexate; mV: Millivolt; µg/mL: Micrograms per Milliliter; µg/cm2/h: Micrograms per Square Centimeter per Hour; µm/nm: Micrometer/Nanometer; NA: Not Applicable; NCT: National Clinical Trial Identifier; NE: Nanoemulsion; NLC/NLCs: Nanostructured Lipid Carrier(s); NSAIDs: Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs; OA/RA: Osteoarthritis/Rheumatoid Arthritis; PBPK: Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic; PDI: Polydispersity Index; PEG: Polyethylene Glycol; PEO: Polyethylene Oxide; PHASE 1/2/3/4: Phases of Clinical Trials; pH: Potential of Hydrogen; PLGA: Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); PLS: Proliposomes; PVP: Polyvinylpyrrolidone; PXRD/XRD: (Powder) X-ray Diffraction; QbD: Quality by Design; RA (contextual): Resorcylic Acid; RH: Rhein; ROS: Reactive Oxygen Species; SC: Stratum Corneum; SD/SDs: Solid Dispersion(s); SDS: Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate; SEDDS/SNEDDS: (Self-)Emulsifying/Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems; SEM: Scanning Electron Microscopy; SLN/SLNs: Solid Lipid Nanoparticle(s); SOD: Superoxide Dismutase; SR: Sustained Release; SVM: Support Vector Machine; SYSADOAs: Symptomatic Slow-Acting Drugs for Osteoarthritis; T50%: Time to Release 50% of the Drug; TFH/THF: Thin-Film Hydration; Tmax: Time to Reach Cmax; TNF-α: Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha; Topical: Application to Skin or Mucosa; Transcutol-P/Ethanol/Propylene Glycol: Penetration Enhancers/Co-surfactants; UP: Ultrasonic Processing; w/w/%: Weight by Weight/Percent; ZP: Zeta Potential.

References

  1. Moghddam, S.R.M.; Ahad, A.; Aqil, M.; Imam, S.S.; Sultana, Y. Formulation and optimization of niosomes for topical diacerein delivery using 3-factor, 3-level Box-Behnken design for the management of psoriasis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 69, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Sharma, N.K.; Mishra, K. Exploration of diacerein as a neuroprotective adjuvant to Adenium obesum: An in-vivo study. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2023, 14, 100761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Mohamed, M.I.; Al-Mahallawi, A.M.; Awadalla, S.M. Development and optimization of osmotically controlled drug delivery system for poorly aqueous soluble diacerein to improve its bioavailability. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2020, 46, 814–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Batt, D.K.; Garala, K.C. Preparation and evaluation of inclusion complexes of diacerein with β-cyclodextrin and hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2013, 77, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Wally, V.; Hovnanian, A.; Ly, J.; Buckova, H.; Brunner, V.; Lettner, T.; Ablinger, M.; Felder, T.K.; Hofbauer, P.; Wolkersdorfer, M. Diacerein orphan drug development for epidermolysis bullosa simplex: A phase 2/3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2018, 78, 892–901.e897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Patil, S.B.; Shete, D.K.; Narade, S.B.; Surve, S.S.; Khan, Z.K.; Bhise, S.B.; Pore, Y.V. Improvement in the dissolution profile of diacerein using a surfactant-based solid dispersion technique. Drug Discov. Ther. 2010, 4, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Petralito, S.; Zanardi, I.; Spera, R.; Memoli, A.; Travagli, V. Spectroscopic characterization of both aqueous and solid-state diacerhein/hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 127, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Eladawy, N.O.; Morsi, N.M.; Shamma, R.N. Diacerein-loaded hyaluosomes as a dual-function platform for osteoarthritis management via intra-articular injection: In vitro characterization and in vivo assessment in a rat model. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Martorell, M.; Castro, N.; Victoriano, M.; Capó, X.; Tejada, S.; Vitalini, S.; Pezzani, R.; Sureda, A. An update of anthraquinone derivatives emodin, diacerein, and catenarin in diabetes. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 3313419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Martel-Pelletier, J.; Pelletier, J.-P. Effects of diacerein at the molecular level in the osteoarthritis disease process. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2010, 2, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Balabanova, R.M. Use of diacerein for the treatment of large joint osteoarthritis (A review of literature and the author’s own experience). Mod. Rheumatol. J. 2015, 9, 30–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Fidelix, T.S.; Macedo, C.R.; Maxwell, L.J.; Trevisani, V.F.M. Diacerein for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014, CD005117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Pavelka, K.; Bruyere, O.; Cooper, C.; Kanis, J.A.; Leeb, B.F.; Maheu, E.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; Monfort, J.; Pelletier, J.-P.; Rizzoli, R. Diacerein: Benefits, risks and place in the management of osteoarthritis. An opinion-based report from the ESCEO. Drugs Aging 2016, 33, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Kongtharvonskul, J.; Anothaisintawee, T.; McEvoy, M.; Attia, J.; Woratanarat, P.; Thakkinstian, A. Efficacy and safety of glucosamine, diacerein, and NSAIDs in osteoarthritis knee: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2015, 20, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Maitra, S.; Das, S.K.; Sinha, D.; Mukherjee, M.; Kumari, L.; Roy, T. Recent Advancements and Future Perspectives in Diacerein Delivery Systems for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Novel Strategies and Emerging Technologies. Palest. Med. Pharm. J. 2025; in press. [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Honvo, G.; Reginster, J.-Y.; Rabenda, V.; Geerinck, A.; Mkinsi, O.; Charles, A.; Rizzoli, R.; Cooper, C.; Avouac, B.; Bruyère, O. Safety of symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis: Outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drugs Aging 2019, 36, 65–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. Roy, T.; Chakraborty, P.; Chowdhury, R.R.; Chatterjee, T.K. Possible Beneficial Role of Novel Anti-Osteoarthritic Drug Diacerein in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2022, 15, 2715–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Wang, F.; Shi, W.-X.; Chen, J.; He, K.; Fang, W. Clinical therapeutic effects of combined diacerein and glucosamine in the treatment of osteoarthritis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2021, 100, e27583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Kumar, K.K.; Sasikanth, K.; Sabareesh, M.; Neerugattu, D. Formulation and evaluation of diacerein cream. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2011, 4, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  20. Patil, S.B.; Shete, T.K.; Narade, S.B.; Surve, S.S.; Khan, Z.K.; Bhokare, K.K.; Pore, Y.V. Physicochemical characterization and improved in vitro dissolution performance of diacerein solid dispersions with PVP K30. Lat. Am. J. Pharm. 2011, 30, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nishal, S.; Jhawat, V.; Phaugat, P.; Dutt, R. DoE Based Formulation Development and Characterization of Topical Nanoemulgel of Diacerein: In-Vitro Release and Permeation Studies. BioNanoScience 2022, 12, 472–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Chaudhari, B.P.; Daniel, K. A validated ultra performance liquid chromatography method for simultaneous estimation of diacerein and aceclofenac in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2022, 15, 1467–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Pawbake, G.R.; Shirolkar, S.V. Formulation, development and evaluation of nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) based gel for topical delivery of diacerein. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020, 11, 794–802. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shah, H.; Madni, A.; Rahim, M.A.; Jan, N.; Khan, A.; Khan, S.; Jabar, A.; Ali, A. Fabrication, in vitro and ex vivo evaluation of proliposomes and liposomal derived gel for enhanced solubility and permeability of diacerein. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0258141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Kazi, T.M.; Dandagi, P.M. A New Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Diacerein and Aceclofenac in Novel Nanoemulgel Formulation and Commercial Tablet Dosage Form in the Presence of their Major Degradation Products Using DoE Approach. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2023, 61, 918–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Almezgagi, M.; Zhang, Y.; Hezam, K.; Shamsan, E.; Gamah, M.; Al-shaebi, F.; Abbas, A.B.; Shoaib, M.; Saif, B.; Han, Y.; et al. Diacerein: Recent insight into pharmacological activities and molecular pathways. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 131, 110594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. ClinicalTrials.gov. Diacerein. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=Diacerein (accessed on 12 November 2025).
  28. Rehman, M.; Madni, A.; Ihsan, A.; Khan, W.S.; Khan, M.I.; Mahmood, M.A.; Ashfaq, M.; Bajwa, S.Z.; Shakir, I. Solid and liquid lipid-based binary solid lipid nanoparticles of diacerein: In vitro evaluation of sustained release, simultaneous loading of gold nanoparticles, and potential thermoresponsive behavior. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 2805–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Gao, D.; Wu, J.-S.; Lu, W.-S.; Chen, S.; Kuo, P.-C.; Chen, C.-M. Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Diacerein. EP 2349289 B1. 13 July 2016. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2349289B1/en (accessed on 20 November 2025).
  30. Alegría, A.; Irarrázaval, S. Is diacerein an alternative for the treatment of osteoarthritis? Medwave 2017, 17, e7041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Liang, Y.; Duan, M.; Yi, W.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Tang, H. Ion-pair compounds of diacerein for enhancing skin permeability in vitro: The compatibility–permeability relationship of counter ion and diacerein. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Panova, E.; Jones, G. Benefit–risk assessment of diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Drug Saf. 2015, 38, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Nicolas, P.; Tod, M.; Padoin, C.; Petitjean, O. Clinical pharmacokinetics of diacerein. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1998, 35, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, D. The effect and safety of diacerein in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2017, 6, 97. [Google Scholar]
  35. Irarrázaval, S.; Mejias, A.A.; Soto, G.B.; Rada, G. Diacerein and arthrosis treatment. Medwave 2018, 18, e7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Kaur, D.; Kaur, J.; Kamal, S.S. Diacerein, its beneficial impact on chondrocytes and notable new clinical applications. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 54, e17534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Fu, Y.; Yang, L.; Liu, L.; Kong, L.; Sun, H.; Sun, Y.; Yin, F.; Yan, G.; Wang, X. Rhein: An Updated Review Concerning Its Biological Activity, Pharmacokinetics, Structure Optimization, and Future Pharmaceutical Applications. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Jain, A.; Mishra, S.K.; Vuddanda, P.R.; Singh, S.K.; Singh, R.; Singh, S. Targeting of diacerein loaded lipid nanoparticles to intra-articular cartilage using chondroitin sulfate as homing carrier for treatment of osteoarthritis in rats. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2014, 10, e1031–e1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Fouad, S.A.; Malaak, F.A.; El-Nabarawi, M.A.; Abu Zeid, K. Development of orally disintegrating tablets containing solid dispersion of a poorly soluble drug for enhanced dissolution: In-vitro optimization/in-vivo evaluation. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0244646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. Fouad, S.A.; Malaak, F.A.; El-Nabarawi, M.A.; Abu Zeid, K.; Ghoneim, A.M. Preparation of solid dispersion systems for enhanced dissolution of poorly water soluble diacerein: In-vitro evaluation, optimization and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Khan, M.I.; Madni, A.; Peltonen, L. Development and in-vitro characterization of sorbitan monolaurate and poloxamer 184 based niosomes for oral delivery of diacerein. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 95, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Khan, M.I.; Madni, A.; Hirvonen, J.; Peltonen, L. Ultrasonic processing technique as a green preparation approach for diacerein-loaded niosomes. AAPS PharmSciTech 2017, 18, 1554–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Liu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Yuhong, J.; Xin, P.; Han, J.L.; Du, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhu, R.; Zhang, M.; Chen, W.; et al. Advances in Nanotechnology for Enhancing the Solubility and Bioavailability of Poorly Soluble Drugs. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2024, 2024, 1469–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Mudie, D.M.; Amidon, G.L.; Amidon, G.E. Physiological parameters for oral delivery and in vitro testing. Mol. Pharm. 2010, 7, 1388–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Savolainen, M.; Kogermann, K.; Heinz, A.; Aaltonen, J.; Peltonen, L.; Strachan, C.; Yliruusi, J. Better understanding of dissolution behaviour of amorphous drugs by in situ solid-state analysis using Raman spectroscopy. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2009, 71, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Kumari, L.; Choudhari, Y.; Patel, P.; Gupta, G.D.; Singh, D.; Rosenholm, J.M.; Bansal, K.K.; Kurmi, B.D. Advancement in Solubilization Approaches: A Step towards Bioavailability Enhancement of Poorly Soluble Drugs. Life 2023, 13, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Brahmachari, B.; Chatterjee, S.; Ghosh, A. Efficacy and safety of diacerein in early knee osteoarthritis: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Rheumatol. 2009, 28, 1193–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. More, S.M.; Rashid, M.A.; Kharwade, R.S.; Taha, M.; Alhamhoom, Y.; Elhassan, G.O.; Gangane, P.; Asar, T.O.; Pise, A.; Kaleem, M.; et al. Development of Solid Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System of Rhein to Improve Biopharmaceutical Performance: Physiochemical Characterization, and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation. Int. J. Nanomed. 2025, 2025, 267–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  49. Allam, A.N.; Hamdallah, S.I.; Abdallah, O.Y. Chitosan-coated diacerein nanosuspensions as a platform for enhancing bioavailability and lowering side effects: Preparation, characterization, and ex vivo/in vivo evaluation. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 2017, 4733–4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Zaki, R.; Ali, A.; El-Menshawe, S.; Bary, A.A. Formulation and in vitro evalution of diacerein loaded niosomes. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 6, 515–521. [Google Scholar]
  51. Elsayed, I.; Abdelbary, A.A.; Elshafeey, A.H. Nanosizing of a poorly soluble drug: Technique optimization, factorial analysis, and pharmacokinetic study in healthy human volunteers. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 2943–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Gómez-Gaete, C.; Retamal, M.; Chávez, C.; Bustos, P.; Godoy, R.; Torres-Vergara, P. Development, characterization and in vitro evaluation of biodegradable rhein-loaded microparticles for treatment of osteoarthritis. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 96, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Khan, M.I.; Madni, A.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, A.; Rehmanand, M.; Mahmood, M.A. ATR-FTIR Based Pre and Post Formulation Compatibility Studies for the Design of Niosomal Drug Delivery System Containing Nonionic Amphiphiles and Chondroprotective Drug. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2015, 37, 527–534. [Google Scholar]
  54. Aziz, D.E.; Abdelbary, A.A.; Elassasy, A.I. Investigating superiority of novel bilosomes over niosomes in the transdermal delivery of diacerein: In vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation and in vivo skin deposition study. J. Liposome Res. 2019, 29, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Chattopadhyay, H.; Auddy, B.; Sur, T.; Gupta, M.; Datta, S. Transdermal co-delivery of glucosamine sulfate and diacerein for the induction of chondroprotection in experimental osteoarthritis. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2020, 10, 1327–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Kesharwani, D.; Paul, S.D.; Paliwal, R.; Satapathy, T. Exploring potential of diacerin nanogel for topical application in arthritis: Formulation development, QbD based optimization and pre-clinical evaluation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2023, 223, 113160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Fareed, N.Y.; Kassab, H.J. Effect of formulation variables on the properties of a new vesicular system of an anthraquinone derivative. J. Adv. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2023, 13, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Shabbir, M.; Barkat, K.; Ashraf, M.U.; Nagra, U.; Shah, S.N.H. Assessment of formulation variables of poor water soluble diacerein for its improved loading and anti-inflammatory activity. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2023, 13, 1780–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Ali, N.A.; Morsi, N.M.; Badr-Eldin, S.M.; Shamma, R.N. Diacerein-loaded surface modified iron oxide microparticles (SMIOMPs): An emerging magnetic system for management of osteoarthritis via intra-articular injection. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1439085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. El-Say, K.M.; Abd-Allah, F.I.; Lila, A.E.; Hassan, A.E.-S.A.; Kassem, A.E.A. Diacerein niosomal gel for topical delivery: Development, in vitro and in vivo assessment. J. Liposome Res. 2016, 26, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Haseeb, M.T.; Hussain, M.A.; Bashir, S.; Ashraf, M.U.; Ahmad, N. Evaluation of superabsorbent linseed-polysaccharides as a novel stimuli-responsive oral sustained release drug delivery system. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2017, 43, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Grassiri, B.; Mezzetta, A.; Maisetta, G.; Migone, C.; Fabiano, A.; Esin, S.; Guazzelli, L.; Zambito, Y.; Batoni, G.; Piras, A.M. Betaine-and l-carnitine-based ionic liquids as solubilising and stabilising agents for the formulation of antimicrobial eye drops containing diacerein. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Mirunalini, R.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Manimekalai, K. Efficacy of chondroitin sulfate with glucosamine versus diacerein in grade ii and iii osteoarthritis knee: A randomized comparative study. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2015, 8, 42–44. [Google Scholar]
  64. El-Kafrawy, D.S.; El-Shoubashy, O.H.; Issa, A.E.; Beltagy, Y.A. Sustainable multi-analyte HPTLC estimation of meloxicam, diclofenac and diacerein along with its major degradation product and official impurity; rhein: Comprehensive greenness and whiteness evaluation. Microchem. J. 2023, 193, 109098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Khadka, P.; Ro, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, I.; Kim, J.T.; Kim, H.; Cho, J.M.; Yun, G.; Lee, J. Pharmaceutical particle technologies: An approach to improve drug solubility, dissolution and bioavailability. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 9, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Bhat, M.R. Bionanocomposites: Technique towards enhancement of solubility, drug release and bioavailability. J. Med. Pharm. Innov. 2015, 2, 6–18. [Google Scholar]
  67. Onkar, K.; Vishal, D.; Kiran, Z.; Ravindra, K. Review on Different Methods of Solubility Enhancement of Bcs Class II Drugs. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 2, 65–77. [Google Scholar]
  68. Alshora, D.H.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Alanazi, F.K. Nanotechnology from particle size reduction to enhancing aqueous solubility. In Surface Chemistry of Nanobiomaterials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 163–191. [Google Scholar]
  69. Patrekar, P.; Patil, C. Solubility enhancement and evaluation of diacerein using cyclodextrin as hydrophilic carriers. J. Pharm. Res. 2009, 2, 923–926. [Google Scholar]
  70. Abd Elkarim, R.A.; El-Shenawy, A.A.; Abdelhafez, W.A.; Osman, S.K. Novel nanosized Diacerein proliposomes for oral delivery: Development and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 12, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Shah, P.; Goodyear, B.; Michniak-Kohn, B.B. A review: Enhancement of solubility and oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Adv. Pharm. J. 2017, 2, 161–173. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bhalani, D.V.; Nutan, B.; Kumar, A.; Singh Chandel, A.K. Bioavailability enhancement techniques for poorly aqueous soluble drugs and therapeutics. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Kumar, S.; Bhargava, D.; Thakkar, A.; Arora, S. Drug carrier systems for solubility enhancement of BCS class II drugs: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Syst. 2013, 30, 217–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  74. Patel, R.D.; Raval, M.K. Formulation of diacerein cocrystal using β-resorcylic acid for improvement of physicomechanical and biopharmaceutical properties. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2020, 25, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Ogden, J.; Parry-Billings, M. Nanotechnology approaches to solving the problems of poorly water-soluble drugs. Drug Discov. 2005, 6, 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  76. Aziz, D.E.; Abdelbary, A.A.; Elassasy, A.I. Fabrication of novel elastosomes for boosting the transdermal delivery of diacerein: Statistical optimization, ex-vivo permeation, in-vivo skin deposition and pharmacokinetic assessment compared to oral formulation. Drug Deliv. 2018, 25, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  77. Tamanna, S. Nanotechnology: A novel approach for treatment of skin disorder. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2021, 11, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Landriscina, A.; Rosen, J.; Friedman, A.J. Nanotechnology, inflammation and the skin barrier: Innovative approaches for skin health and cosmesis. Cosmetics 2015, 2, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Wei, J.; Mu, J.; Tang, Y.; Qin, D.; Duan, J.; Wu, A. Next-generation nanomaterials: Advancing ocular anti-inflammatory drug therapy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Lv, Z.; Li, S.; Zeng, G.; Yao, K.; Han, H. Recent progress of nanomedicine in managing dry eye disease. Adv. Ophthalmol. Pract. Res. 2024, 4, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Piovesan, F.; Tres, G.S.; Moreira, L.B.; Andrades, M.E.; Lisboa, H.K.; Fuchs, S.C. Effect of diacerein on renal function and inflammatory cytokines in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Tao, S.; Wang, Q.; Ma, P.-Q.; Li, Z.-B.; Wu, Y.-L.; Li, D.-W. Research advances in smart responsive-hydrogel dressings with potential clinical diabetic wound healing properties. Mil. Med. Res. 2023, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Feng, Z.; Han, B.; Yu, D.-G.; Wang, K. Advances in the preparation of nanofiber dressings by electrospinning for promoting diabetic wound healing. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Singh, R.; Pimple, S.; Maurya, P.; Joshi, A.; Swami, A. Formulation Development and Evaluation OF Diacerein HARD Gelatin Capsules. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Dev. 2014, 6, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  85. Javed, I.; Hussain, S.Z.; Shahzad, A.; Khan, J.M.; ur-Rehman, H.; Rehman, M.; Usman, F.; Razi, M.T.; Shah, M.R.; Hussain, I. Lecithin-gold hybrid nanocarriers as efficient and pH selective vehicles for oral delivery of diacerein—In-vitro and in-vivo study. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 141, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  86. Aggarwal, A.K.; Singh, S. Physicochemical characterization and dissolution study of solid dispersions of diacerein with polyethylene glycol 6000. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2011, 37, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Dhaneshwar, S.; Patel, V.; Patil, D.; Meena, G. Studies on synthesis, stability, release and pharmacodynamic profile of a novel diacerein-thymol prodrug. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  88. Thenge, R.R.; Patond, V.; Adhao, V.S.; Ajmire, P.V.; Barde, L.N.; Mahajan, N.M.; Tekade, N.P. Preparation and Characterization of Co-Crystals of Diacerein. Indones. J. Pharm. 2017, 28, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Tomar, S.; Chakraborti, S.; Jindal, A.; Grewal, M.K.; Chadha, R. Cocrystals of diacerein: Towards the development of improved biopharmaceutical parameters. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 574, 118942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  90. Petralito, S.; Zanardi, I.; Memoli, A.; Annesini, M.C.; Travagli, V. Cyclodextrin/diacerein inclusion complex: A tool for therapeutic drug delivery. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2011, 24, 967–972. [Google Scholar]
  91. chand Gupta, K.; Singhvi, I. Formulation, Characterization and Optimization of Mouth Dissolving Tablets of Diacerein: Β-Cyclodextrin Solid Dispersion. Asian J. Pharm. Res. Dev. 2015, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  92. Tamboli, J.A.; Mohite, S.K. Development of solid self-microemulsifying drug delivery system of diacerein for enhanced dissolution rate. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2019, 12, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Naseef, M.A.; Ibrahim, H.K.; Nour, S.A.E.-K. Solid form of lipid-based self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems for minimization of diacerein adverse effects: Development and bioequivalence evaluation in albino rabbits. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 3097–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Parekh, K.K.; Paun, J.S.; Soniwala, M.M. Formulation and evaluation of nanosuspension to improve solubility and dissolution of diacerein. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2017, 8, 1643. [Google Scholar]
  95. Siddiqui, B.; Rehman, A.u.; Ahmed, N. Development and In Vitro Characterization of Diacerein Loaded Chitosan–Chondroitin Sulfate Nanoemulgel for Osteoarthritis. Mater. Proc. 2021, 4, 47. [Google Scholar]
  96. Jung, J.H.; Kim, S.E.; Kim, H.J.; Park, K.; Song, G.G.; Choi, S.J. A comparative pilot study of oral diacerein and locally treated diacerein-loaded nanoparticles in a model of osteoarthritis. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 581, 119249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Jain, A.; Singh, S.K.; Singh, Y.; Singh, S. Development of lipid nanoparticles of diacerein, an antiosteoarthritic drug for enhancement in bioavailability and reduction in its side effects. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Kesharwani, D.; Das Paul, S.; Paliwal, R.; Satapathy, T. Development, QbD based optimization and in vitro characterization of Diacerein loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for topical applications. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2023, 16, 100565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Kadam, S.; Shinkar, D.; Saudagar, R. Review on solubility enhancement techniques. IJPBS 2013, 3, 462–475. [Google Scholar]
  100. Prashant, S.; Prashant, S.; Narkhede, M.; Nehete, J. Solubility enhancement of diacerein by mannitol solid dispersons. Int. J. Pharm. Pharma. Sci. 2011, 3, 261–264. [Google Scholar]
  101. Soliman, M.A.N.; Ibrahim, H.K.; Nour, S.A.E.-K. Diacerein solid dispersion loaded tablets for minimization of drug adverse effects: Statistical design, formulation, in vitro, and in vivo evaluation. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2021, 26, 302–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Hasan, A.; Abd Elghany, M.; Sabry, S. Design and characterization of intra-oral fast dissolving tablets containing diacerein-solid dispersion. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 10, 044–053. [Google Scholar]
  103. Mandawgade, S.D.; Kulkarni, S.; Pal, A.; Srivastava, S.; Padhi, B.K.; Raghuvanshi, R.S. Development and pharmacokinetic evaluation of new oral formulations of diacerein. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2016, 13, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Kabir, E.R.; Syeara, N.; Khan, T.T.S. Formulation design and optimization of sustained release tablet dosage form of Diacerein. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 189, 111982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  105. Mukhopadhyaya, S.; Chatterjee, N.; Chatterjee, T.K. Evaluation of Diacerein Microsphere Manufactured by Fluid Bed Bottom Spray Coating Technique as Sustained Release Drug Delivery Form. Indian Drugs 2022, 59, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Patel, R.D.; Raval, M.K.; Pethani, T.M. Application of a validated RP-HPLC method in solubility and dissolution testing for simultaneous estimation of Diacerein and its active metabolite Rhein in presence of Coformers in the eutectic tablet formulation. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2021, 59, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Patel, R.D.; Raval, M.K.; Pethani, T.M.; Waghela, B.N.; Shukla, R.H.; Buch, P.R.; Vadalia, J.M.; Sharma, T.P.; Airao, V.A. RP-HPLC method development, validation and pharmacokinetic applicability in preclinical evaluation of rhein treated with novel diacerein eutectics. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2022, 36, e5465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Davis, M.E.; Brewster, M.E. Cyclodextrin-based pharmaceutics: Past, present and future. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Maski, N.; Kumaran, A.; Girhepunje, K.; Ghode, P.; Randive, S.; Pal, R. Studies on the preparation, characterization and solubility of β-cyclodextrin-diacerein inclusion complexes. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 1, 121–135. [Google Scholar]
  110. Hamedi, A.; Anceschi, A.; Patrucco, A.; Hasanzadeh, M. A γ-cyclodextrin-based metal–organic framework (γ-CD-MOF): A review of recent advances for drug delivery application. J. Drug Target. 2022, 30, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  111. Shaban, S.M.; Kang, J.; Kim, D.-H. Surfactants: Recent advances and their applications. Compos. Commun. 2020, 22, 100537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Gibaldi, M.; Feldman, S. Mechanisms of surfactant effects on drug absorption. J. Pharm. Sci. 1970, 59, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  113. Chen, Y.L.; Chen, S.; Frank, C.; Israelachvili, J. Molecular mechanisms and kinetics during the self-assembly of surfactant layers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1992, 153, 244–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  114. Albassam, N.Y.; Kassab, H.J. Diacerein loaded novasome for transdermal delivery: Prepartion, in-vitro characterization and factors affecting formulation. Iraqi J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 32, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Bodnár, K.; Fehér, P.; Ujhelyi, Z.; Bácskay, I.; Józsa, L. Recent approaches for the topical treatment of psoriasis using nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  116. Fadaei, M.S.; Fadaei, M.R.; Kheirieh, A.E.; Rahmanian-Devin, P.; Dabbaghi, M.M.; Tavallaei, K.N.; Shafaghi, A.; Hatami, H.; Rahimi, V.B.; Nokhodchi, A. Niosome as a promising tool for increasing the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory compounds. EXCLI J. 2024, 23, 212. [Google Scholar]
  117. Aziz, D.E.; Abdelbary, A.A.; Elassasy, A.I. Implementing central composite design for developing transdermal diacerein-loaded niosomes: Ex vivo permeation and in vivo deposition. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2018, 15, 1330–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  118. Khan, M.I.; Madni, A.; Ahmad, S.; Mahmood, M.A.; Rehman, M.; Ashfaq, M. Formulation design and characterization of a non-ionic surfactant based vesicular system for the sustained delivery of a new chondroprotective agent. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 51, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  119. Nayak, D.; Rathnanand, M.; Tippavajhala, V.K. Unlocking the potential of bilosomes and modified bilosomes: A comprehensive journey into advanced drug delivery trends. AAPS PharmSciTech 2023, 24, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  120. illastria Rosalina, A.; Sagita, E.; Iskandarsyah, I. Novasome: Combining ufasome and niosome for excellent vesicular drug delivery system. Sci. Pharm. 2023, 2, 26–36. [Google Scholar]
  121. Sarolia, J.; Baldha, R.; Chakraborthy, G.; Rathod, S. The effect of edge activator on the evolution and application of a nonionic surfactant: The elastic vesicular system. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2023, 26, 747–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Lal, D.K.; Kumar, B.; Saeedan, A.S.; Ansari, M.N. An overview of nanoemulgels for bioavailability enhancement in inflammatory conditions via topical delivery. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Sinha, A.; Garg, U.; Nagaich, U.; Chaudhary, A.; Pandey, M.; Jain, N. Emulgels: A promising topical drug delivery system for arthritis management and care. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2024, 29, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  124. Gupta, J.; Sharma, G. Nanogel: A versatile drug delivery system for the treatment of various diseases and their future perspective. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2025, 15, 455–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  125. PAWBAKE, G.R.; SHIROLKAR, S.V. Formulation and evaluation of diacerein microemulgel topical drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  126. Al-Remawi, M.; Elsayed, A.; Saleem, A.a.; Saleem, M. Development of solid lipid nanoparticles of diacerein in a stable oral liquid dosage form using a central composite design. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2024, 45, 1880–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  127. Singh, N.; Kushwaha, P.; Ahmad, U.; Abdullah, M. Proliposomes: An approach for the development of stable liposome. Ars Pharm. 2019, 60, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  128. Dhiman, N.; Sarvaiya, J.; Mohindroo, P. A drift on liposomes to proliposomes: Recent advances and promising approaches. J. Liposome Res. 2022, 32, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  129. Daeihamed, M.; Dadashzadeh, S.; Haeri, A.; Faghih Akhlaghi, M. Potential of liposomes for enhancement of oral drug absorption. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2017, 14, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  130. Jain, S.; Jain, N.; Bhadra, D.; Tiwary, A.; Jain, N. Transdermal delivery of an analgesic agent using elastic liposomes: Preparation, characterization and performance evaluation. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2005, 2, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  131. Huang, H.; Lou, Z.; Zheng, S.; Wu, J.; Yao, Q.; Chen, R.; Kou, L.; Chen, D. Intra-articular drug delivery systems for osteoarthritis therapy: Shifting from sustained release to enhancing penetration into cartilage. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 767–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Kang, M.L.; Im, G.-I. Drug delivery systems for intra-articular treatment of osteoarthritis. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2014, 11, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  133. Ho, M.J.; Kim, S.R.; Choi, Y.W.; Kang, M.J. Recent advances in intra-articular drug delivery systems to extend drug retention in joint. J. Pharm. Investig. 2019, 49, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  134. Abhinav, M.; Neha, J.; Anne, G.; Bharti, V. Role of novel drug delivery systems in bioavailability enhancement: At a glance. Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 2016, 6, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  135. Yadollahi, R.; Vasilev, K.; Simovic, S. Nanosuspension technologies for delivery of poorly soluble drugs. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 216375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  136. Balata, G.F.; Essa, E.A.; Shamardl, H.A.; Zaidan, S.H.; Abourehab, M.A. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems as a tool to improve solubility and bioavailability of resveratrol. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2016, 2016, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  137. Singh, B.; Bandopadhyay, S.; Kapil, R.; Singh, R.; Katare, O.P. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS): Formulation development, characterization, and applications. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Syst. 2009, 26, 427–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  138. Bhupinder, M.; Roy, G.; Bajwa, B.; Sandeep, K. Self emulsified drug delivery system for the enhancement of oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 2013, 2, 427–436. [Google Scholar]
  139. Fazal, T.; Murtaza, B.N.; Shah, M.; Iqbal, S.; Rehman, M.-U.; Jaber, F.; Dera, A.A.; Awwad, N.S.; Ibrahium, H.A. Recent developments in natural biopolymer based drug delivery systems. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 23087–23121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  140. Van de Velde, K.; Kiekens, P. Biopolymers: Overview of several properties and consequences on their applications. Polym. Test. 2002, 21, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  141. Bansal, M.; Gupta, D.K.; Sachdeva, M. Formulation and Characterization of Expandable Tablet of Diacerein using Swellable Polymers. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2022, 12, 156–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  142. Danish, Z.; Hussain, R.M.A.; Ijaz, H.; Mughal, S.; Saeed, H.; Aslam, I.; Qureshi, J.; Razaque, G.; Imran, M.; Khan, A. Formulation, optimization and in vitro evaluation of sustained release oral hydrogels of diacerein to treat arthritis. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 36, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  143. Roy, T.; Chatterjee, T. Formulation and evaluation of microspheres of anti-inflammatory drug diacerein prepared by ionotropic gelation method. Palest. Med. Pharm. J. 2022, 8, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  144. Roy, T.; Chatterjee, T.K. Beneficial roles of sustained release formulations of diacerein microspheres in comparison to free diacerein incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) induced arthritis model in rat. Palest. Med. Pharm. J. 2023, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  145. Wu, C.; Yu, Q.; Huang, C.; Li, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, D. Microneedles as transdermal drug delivery system for enhancing skin disease treatment. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2024, 14, 5161–5180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  146. Priya, S.; Tomar, Y.; Desai, V.M.; Singhvi, G. Enhanced skin drug delivery using dissolving microneedles: A potential approach for the management of skin disorders. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2023, 20, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  147. Shabbir, M.; Barkat, K.; Ashraf, M.U.; Nagra, U. Development of a novel self-dissolving microneedle-assisted percutaneous delivery system of diacerein through solid dispersion gel: Solubility enhancement, proof of anti-inflammatory activity and safety. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2023, 20, 1351–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  148. Singh, S.; Awasthi, R. Topical transferosomal gel of berberine HCl and diacerein reduced TNF-α and IL-17A levels and reduced epidermal thickness in imiquimod-induced psoriatic BALB/c mice. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2025, 106, 106731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Singh, S.; Awasthi, R. Berberine HCl and diacerein loaded dual delivery transferosomes: Formulation and optimization using Box-Behnken design. ADMET DMPK 2024, 12, 553–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  150. El-Refaie, W.M.; Ghazy, M.S.; Ateyya, F.A.; Sheta, E.; Shafek, M.Y.; Ibrahim, M.S.; Ismail, M.M.; Gowayed, M.A. Rhein methotrexate-decorated solid lipid nanoparticles altering adjuvant arthritis progression through endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis. Inflammopharmacology 2023, 31, 3127–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  151. Kongtharvonskul, J.; Woratanarat, P.; McEvoy, M.; Attia, J.; Wongsak, S.; Kawinwonggowit, V.; Thakkinstian, A. Efficacy of glucosamine plus diacerein versus monotherapy of glucosamine: A double-blind, parallel randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016, 18, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  152. Treewipanon, N.; Kasetsuwan, N.; Reinprayoon, U.; Satitpitakul, V.; Uthaithammarat, L.; Tanpowpong, T. Efficacy of Interleukin-1β Inhibitor on Dry Eye Disease in Patients with Degenerative Arthritis. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2023, 17, 2967–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  153. European Medicines Agency. Annual Report 2014; EMA: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  154. Nanotechnology Guidance Documents. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/science-research/nanotechnology-programs-fda/nanotechnology-guidance-documents (accessed on 23 March 2018).
  155. Simões, M.F.; Silva, G.; Pinto, A.C.; Fonseca, M.; Silva, N.E.; Pinto, R.M.; Simões, S. Artificial neural networks applied to quality-by-design: From formulation development to clinical outcome. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2020, 152, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  156. Hidayat, A.F.; Wardhana, Y.W.; Suwendar, S.; Mohammed, A.F.A.; Mahmoud, S.A.; Elamin, K.M.; Wathoni, N. A Review on QbD-Driven Optimization of Lipid Nanoparticles for Oral Drug Delivery: From Framework to Formulation. Int. J. Nanomed. 2025, 2025, 8611–8651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  157. Koletti, A.E.; Tsarouchi, E.; Kapourani, A.; Kontogiannopoulos, K.N.; Assimopoulou, A.N.; Barmpalexis, P. Gelatin nanoparticles for NSAID systemic administration: Quality by design and artificial neural networks implementation. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 578, 119118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  158. Singh, A.; Nishad, R. A Review Analysis of Drug Delivery System Using Artificial Intelligence. Biomed. Inform. Smart Healthc. 2025, 1, 52–66. [Google Scholar]
  159. Chou, W.-C.; Lin, Z. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Toxicol. Sci. 2023, 191, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  160. Bao, Z.; Bufton, J.; Hickman, R.J.; Aspuru-Guzik, A.; Bannigan, P.; Allen, C. Revolutionizing drug formulation development: The increasing impact of machine learning. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2023, 202, 115108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  161. Vidal-Henriquez, E.; Holder, T.; Lee, N.F.; Pompe, C.; Teese, M.G. Machine learning driven acceleration of biopharmaceutical formulation development using Excipient Prediction Software (ExPreSo). Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2025, 27, 4517–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.