Next Article in Journal
Chimeric Capsid Proteins Impact Transduction Efficiency of Haploid Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors
Next Article in Special Issue
Comment on Sarathkumara et al.: Exposure to Hantavirus is a Risk Factor Associated with Kidney Diseases in Sri Lanka: A Cross Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Insight into the Tropism of Dengue Virus in Humans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suggestive Serological Evidence of Infection with Shrew-Borne Imjin Virus (Hantaviridae) in Humans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/v11121137
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Characterization and Molecular Evolution of Urban Seoul Virus in Southern China

by
Qianqian Su
1,2,†,
Yi Chen
2,3,†,
Meng Li
1,
Jiajun Ma
1,
Bo Wang
1,2,
Jing Luo
1 and
Hongxuan He
1,*
1
National Research Center for Wildlife-Borne Diseases, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2019, 11(12), 1137; https://doi.org/10.3390/v11121137
Received: 18 September 2019 / Revised: 6 December 2019 / Accepted: 7 December 2019 / Published: 9 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hantaviruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seoul virus (SEOV), which causes hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in humans, has spread all over the world, especially in mainland China. Understanding basic mechanisms of SEOV evolution is essential to better combat and prevent viral diseases. Here, we examined SEOV prevalence and evolution in the residential area of four districts in Guangzhou city, China. The carriage of SEOV was observed in 33.33% of the sampled rodents, with 35.96% of the sampled Rattus norvegicus and 13.33% of R. tanezumi. Based on the comprehensive analyses of large (L), medium (M), and small (S) segments, our study first demonstrated that the genetic characterization of urban SEOV was shaped by high nucleotide substitution rates, purifying selection, and recombination. Additionally, we detected mutational saturation in the S segment of SEOV, which may lead to the biases of genetic divergence and substitution rates in our study. Importantly, we have filled the gap of SEOV evolution in the urban area. The genetic variation of SEOV may highlight the risk of HFRS, which merits further investigation.

1. Introduction

Seoul virus (SEOV), which belongs to the genus Orthohantavirus, family Hantaviridae, and order Bunyavirales, is enveloped, single-stranded, and a negative-sense RNA virus. The virus establishes a persistent infection, which causes no apparent harm in rodents [1,2]. However, SEOV is pathogenic, which caused hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in humans [3,4]. As the major endemic countries of HFRS, China accounts for 90% of total HFRS cases worldwide [4,5,6,7]. HFRS mainly occurred in rural areas in the past, but recently extended to urban areas and even to city centers in China [4,8,9]. Unlike other hantaviruses, SEOV has a worldwide geographic distribution range, from Asia to Africa, Europe, and both Americas mainly because of worldwide spread of brown rats [10]. Under the fast socioeconomic development and frequent trade, SEOV is probably the most important global hantavirus, which posed threats to public health in most areas [10,11]. However, SEOV remains the globally most underestimated pathogenic hantavirus [11].
The SEOV genome consists of three separate segments, which is referred to as the large (L), medium (M), and small (S) segments. These three segments encode the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), two envelope glycoproteins (Gn and Gc), and nucleocapsid protein (N), respectively [12,13]. Generally, RNA viruses evolve with remarkable rapidity, high rates of mutation and substitution, short generation time, and huge population sizes [14,15]. Further evidences also show that purifying selection is a dominant evolutionary force for some RNA viral genes [14,15]. Additionally, recombination and reassortment might also play an important role in RNA virus evolution [16,17,18]. Despite of some reports on hantaviruses prevalence and evolution [19,20,21,22], the sequence information and mechanisms of evolution in SEOV, especially in urban context, remain to be fully elucidated.
Urbanization is a global trend that results from economic development [9,23]. Features of urban environments provide unique opportunities for the rats to colonize, for example, suitable harborage, food and water sources, and efficient traffic systems [24]. Additionally, close contacts occur between commensal rats and people in the urban environment, which further increases the risk of disease transmission [9,24,25,26]. Guangzhou has a population of 14.5 millionpeople, of which 20%–30% are floating (such as the temporary resident population, registered passenger population, and transit population). Indeed, the epidemic tendency of HFRS recently increased in Guangzhou [27,28]. For the first time we attempted to analyze the longer sequences of SEOV in the urban environment. By using different methods, we can gain more insights into the evolution of SEOV, which will provide effective guidance for relevant government departments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The sample collection and handling complied with the Institutional Guidelines for Animal Use and Care at the Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (approval number IOZ12017).

2.2. Samples

The study area comprised four districts (Haizhu, Liwan, Yuexiu, Baiyun) in Guangzhou, the capital city of the Guangdong province. Rodents are captured using both animal live traps and snap traps in the urban residential area from 2018 to 2019 (Figure 1). The four districts are old urban centers, and the population density is relatively large. The rats trapped by live traps were dissected under anesthesia and then killed for tissues sampling. The rats captured by snap traps were just processed for tissues collections. Sex and body weights were recorded. The animal species was determined by morphological identification and cytochrome b (Cyt-b) gene sequencing. The lung and liver were frozen with liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C for further hantavirus detection and species identification, respectively.

2.3. Sequences Amplification and Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from the lung with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. A genomic DNA extraction kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) was used to extract DNA from the liver according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Both the quantity and quality of total RNA and DNA were assessed by measuring OD260/280 ratios using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, USA). The cDNA was synthesized in a 40 µL reaction volume by using the GoScript Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, USA). A nested RT-PCR assay was used to detect currently known and possible novel members of hantaviruses associated with rodents or insectivores from the lung [29]. The sequence of the rat Cyt-b gene was recovered from the liver using a standard PCR with primers CB1 and CB2 [30]. The obtained positive fragments of hantavirus (423bp) and Cyt-b gene sequences were all successfully sequenced using the ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Appled Biosystems, Foster City, USA).
The L, M, and S segments of all the PCR positive lung tissues were generated by RT-PCR. Primers were designed, according to Seoul orthohantavirus sequences published in GenBank, to amplify overlapping regions of the L, M, and S segments (Table S1). The PCR program was as follows: a cycle of 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, Tm for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and then 72 °C for 7 min. The obtained amplicons were gel-purified and sequenced using the ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer. The sequencing was repeated two–three times to ensure accuracy. Sequence editing and assembly were performed using DNAMAN8 (LynnonBioSoft, USA). The results were then submitted to the NCBI database.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

To investigate the evolutionary relationships between SEOV from Guangzhou and other areas, we built phylogenetic trees using the L (accession numbers, MN022844-MN022871), M (accession numbers, MN022816-MN022843), and S (accession numbers, MN022788-MN022815) sequences (Table S2). Other representative sequences of SEOV were downloaded from GenBank (Table S3). The best fit substitution model was determined by jModelTest version 2.1.7 [31]. Maximum clade credibility (MCC) trees were constructed by the BEAST v1.8.4 software [32]. Different combinations of relaxed-clock models (exponential and lognormal models) and branch rate models (constant, Bayesian Skyline, extended Bayesian Skyline, and BayersianSkyGrid models) were performed to determine which was the best phylodynamic models. Then we imported the resultant *log files into Tracer (v1.6) and performed model comparison analyses (AICM analysis), and the lower AICM value was selected as the better model fit. MCC trees were obtained from the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) tree samples using TreeAnnotator v1.8.4 with a posterior probability greater than 0.7 [32]. The resulting trees were edited and illustrated using FigTree v1.4.2 [33].
We first searched and checked 25 SEOV strains with three genome sequences in Genbank. However, three of them were not suitable for our analysis. Two of them were vaccine strains. The only obtainable host information for another one was cell. Ultimately, we chose the remaining 22 strains for L, M, and S segments genetic analyses. Then, the first 210 gene sequences in the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) output were collected for M and S segments. The subsequent outputs after the first 210 sequences presented either low identity or low score (probably not SEOV). Notably, the number of SEOV with full L segments was limited (only 26 sequences could be used), so the number of L segments used for phylogenetic tree and evolution analysis were less than M and S segments. The initial trees of M and S segments were constructed using MEGA5 [34], and some sequences were deleted without impairing the topological structure of phylogenetic trees. The major lineages and the most basal sequences in clades were preserved [35].
In this study, a Bayesian tree (Figure S1) was constructed based on the part of the L segment amplified by the identification primers [29] with MrBayes 3.2.6 software [36]. The resulting trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.2 [33].

2.5. Evolutionary Rates and Divergence Times

To evaluate the rates of nucleotide substitutions and the estimated divergence time of each gene segment from its time to the most recent common ancestors (TMRCA), we used an uncorrelated relax-clock Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method in BEAST v1.8.4, with uncertainty in all estimates reflected in the 95% high probability density (HPD) intervals [32]. For each analysis, we set MCMC chains to run 100 million or 200 million iterations and sampled every 10,000 or 20,000 iterations after a 10% burn-in, and all the effective sample sizes were well over 200 [32].
Molecular data sampled over a short timeframe often appear to evolve at higher rates than those sampled over a longer time period [37,38]. Additionally, a report showed that mutational saturation was the predominant cause of biases in molecular clock dating for highly diverged hantavirus sequences [39]. So we detected the ratio of transition to transversion mutations (ti/tv), the ratio of the number of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions per site (dN/dS), the α shape parameter of the Γ-distribution of among-site rate variation, and GC-content through CODEML in PAML v4 [40,41]. We investigated signals of mutational saturation among different evolutionary levels, by selectively removing the more divergent lineages as the reduced evolutionary age [38,39]. Then we compared the complete and reduced data set to determine any changes in ti/tv over time. For the reduced data set, basal branches of the topology were illustrated in Supplementary Figures S2–S4.
In addition, pairwise genetic divergence was calculated in MEGA 6 [34]. Statistical significance of the correlation between the matrices of geographical distance and genetic divergence was determined with the Mantel test using the ade4 package [42].

2.6. Molecular Diversity and Natural Selection Analyses

Basic measures of sequence diversity, the number of variable sites (SNPs), the number of haplotype, haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity per site (π), and Watterson’s estimator θW, were summarized in DnaSP v.5 [43]. Several neutrality tests, such as Tajima’s D [44], Fu-Li D* and Fu-Li F* [45], and the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test [46] were performed on sequence data to examine evidences for selective pressure in DnaSP v.5 [43]. The ω (dN/dS) of SEOV strains in Guangzhou was detected with PAML v4 [40,41]. For a conservative detection of sites evolving under positive selection within SEOV from Guangzhou, three segments were tested under the M7/M8 site model by CODEML in PAML v4. Models were evaluated under a likelihood ratio test (LRT) using χ2 distribution. Sites under positive selection were identified by Bayes’ Empirical Bayes analysis implemented in PAML v4 [40,41]. Next, a series of maximum likelihood methods were implemented in the Datamonkey Web server [47] to detect positive selected codons, such as FUBAR, FEL, and SLAC. Only sites identified by at least two of these methods were considered positively selected.

2.7. Detection of Recombination

Analyses were conducted on the three segments separately and also on concatenated L, M, and S segments for each isolate to detect recombination and reassortment, respectively, in the Recombination Detection Program 4 (RDP4) [48]. The presence of reassortment events was determined by applying recombination analysis techniques and then identified breakpoints located at the end of a segment. Thus, the location of breakpoints was used to distinguish recombination or reassortment events. A confirmed recombination/reassortment event was required to satisfy the following two conditions (as suggested by the RDP manual): (1) confirmed by at least two methods supported with P < 0.05 and (2) the RDP recombination consensus score (RDPRCS) was >0.60. If an event met the first condition, but had an RDPRCS in the range 0.4–0.6, it was considered a possible recombination; otherwise the event was rejected. The plausible recombination/reassortment events were shown in the table, which listed detection methods and significance, RDPRCS values, and breakpoints. The estimation of recombination breakpoint confidence intervals was used to build new phylogenetic trees by Bayesian methods using MrBayes 3.2.6 software [36]. The resulting trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.2 [33].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The differences of prevalence between species, sex, and body weights were analyzed through Mann-Whitney U Test in SPSS16.0 (IBM, New York, USA). A probability of 0.05 was considered to be the threshold.

3. Results

3.1. Samples and Prevalence Rate

A total of 129 animals were obtained in the four districts in Guangzhou city. Males (n = 67) were trapped slightly more than females (n = 62). R. norvegicus (n = 114) were trapped more than R. tanezumi (n = 15). Cyt-b sequences obtained from liver confirmed the species. Lung samples were tested for the presence of hantavirus RNA with primers directed at a conserved region of L segment. Sequencing and BLAST in NCBI confirmed the presence of SEOV RNA in 43 of 129 samples, which lead to a positive rate of 33.33% (Figure 1). The positivity rate was 35.96% (41/114) and 13.33% (2/15) in R. norvegicus and R. tanezumi, respectively (Figure 1). The positive rates showed no significant differences in species and sexes (Table 1). In addition, the weights of positive rats were significantly heavier than those of negative ones (Table 1).

3.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

A total of 28 partial L segment sequences (nt36–6323), 28 full CDS sequences of M segment (nt 46–3447), and 28 partial S segment sequences (nt 429–1331) were successfully obtained from PCR-positive R. norvegicus. We did not obtain the virus sequences from tissues of positive R. tanezumi (Figure 1). Based on the Bayesian tree of the part L segment amplified by the identification primers, no significant divergence was found between these successful or failed amplified SEOV (Figure S1).
The MCC trees showed that Guangzhou SEOV clustered together in a single well-supported clade, indicating the genetic specificity of SEOV in Guangzhou (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). Moreover, the strains from Baiyun District clustered together for L segment. In addition, we did not find any significant association between geographical distance and genetic divergence in Guangzhou SEOV (all P > 0.5).

3.3. Evolutionary Rates and Divergence Time

Former reports showed that failure to account for mutational saturation can lead to an increase in the estimate of α over time and a decline in that of ti/tv [37,38]. Our results showed that estimates of α increased while estimates of ti/tv declined over time, indicating that the substitution model did not accurately account for mutational saturation in the complete data sets for S segment. This may cause the biases in estimates of the substitution rate and divergence time in the S segment (Table 2 and Table 3). The ti/tv of L and M segments did not show decline over time (Table 4). Additionally, no evidences of temporal differences in GC content were observed in L, M, and S segments (Table 4). Nucleotide length, best-fit model, and MCMC chain length for each segment of SEOV were displayed in Table S4.

3.4. Molecular Diversity and Natural Selection Analyses

The SNPs identified from L, M, and S segments of SEOV in Guangzhou were 214, 160, and 33, respectively. The numbers of haplotype monitored in the L, M, and S segments were 18, 20, and 7, respectively. Haplotype diversity values across loci ranged from 0.815 to 0.960, and nucleotide diversity values ranged from 0.010 to 0.014 (Table 5). The values of Tajima’s D, Fu-Li D*, and Fu-Li F* were negative, but the levels did not significantly deviate from neutral expectations (Table 5). We used Seoul/DN2/2014 that was divergent from Guangzhou SEOV strains as an outgroup for MK test in all the three segments. We detected strong purifying selection in the L segment of Guangzhou SEOV, as the neutrality index value above 1 indicated an excess of replacement changes (Table 5). The selection pressure analyses of Guangzhou SEOV revealed that ω values ranged from 0.035 to 0.049 (far lower than 1), indicating that L, M, and S segments tended to be subjective to purifying selection (Table 6). Additionally, codon-specific analyses also indicated some evidences of positive selection (Table 6). One positively selected site (codon 66) in the L segment was significant with PAML and FUBAR (Table 6).

3.5. Recombination Analysis

In recombination analysis, six significant potential recombination events (PRE) were detected in L (GZRn95, 98, and 104) and M (GZRn92, 98, and 110) segments (Table 7). The breakpoints of these PREs were listed in Table 7. We constructed the phylogenetic trees using sequences of either the putative recombinant region or the region without recombination. Significant changes in the topology of the trees were observed in GZRn98 and GZRn104 of the L segment, and in GZRn92 and GZRn110 of the M segment. Notably, GZRn95 and GZRn104 with different haplotypes had the same recombination area and they were both obtained from Yuexiu District. In addition, GZRn98 was actually a double recombinant, because it had recombination events in both L and M segments. (Figures S5–S10). However, no reassortment was detected in our analysis.

4. Discussion

Numerous HFRS outbreaks are major environmental and public health concerns in the world, especially in developing countries [9,11,23]. Although efforts have been made, the paucity of SEOV sequence data has hampered important researches. Here we implement an in-depth analysis of the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of SEOV in the urban environments.
The epidemiology investigation revealed that SEOV was the main hantavirusin Guangzhou city. This result was in agreement with former reports, which indicated that SEOV was predominant in the residential habitats in China [4,10,11]. The amount of captured R. norvegicus was higher than R. tanezumi, suggesting that R. norvegicus was the dominant species in Guangzhou city. However, the prevalence did not significantly differ between these two species. Our results confirmed that R. norvegicus was the predominant carriers for hantaviruses in the residential habitats [10,11]. The high prevalence (33.33%) of SEOV may be directly related to the reservoir species and urban environment [10]. Due to a combination of adequate harborage, food, and water supply, the population of city rats was high [23,24,25]. Moreover, the frequent contact and dispersal of city rats might increase the spread of the virus, as we did not find any significant associations between geographical distance and genetic divergence in Guangzhou SEOV. Generally, weight is a good proxy for age [49,50]. The weights of positive ratswere significantly heavier than those of negative ones, which demonstrated that the older the animal, the greater the likelihood that it will become exposed to and infected with SEOV [51]. Moreover, body weight has been used as an indicator of sexual maturity in R. norvegicus. It meant that physiological and behavioral changes associated with sexual maturation may favor SEOV infection [51].Unfortunately, we failed to recover the L, M, and S segments from R. tanezumi and the other PCR-positive R. norvegicus probably due to the sample quality. The rats in our study were trapped through snap traps and live traps. Thus, both dead and live rats were captured. We put snap traps the night before, checked and collected animals early in the next morning. Thus, the rats might be caught early and were dead for a long time, which caused the virus to degrade, further interfered with the amplification of gene segments. SEOV was a RNA virus, and thus the amplification of genome segments required high quality of tissues. Report shows that hantavirus is sensitive to heat (30 min at 60 °C) [52] and the longevity of Puumala virus (PUUV) and Tula virus (TULV) depends on the temperature and moisture [53]. In nature, there are additional physical and chemical factors, such as UV light, sunlight, and pH, which may influence the longevity of viruses [53]. Moreover, no significant divergence was found between these successful or failed amplified SEOV on the basis of the part L segment. Particularly, we also recovered part of L, M, and S segments in other positive rats. The sequences were short and thus we did not use them for evolutionary analysis. R. norvegicus and R. tanezumi are partially sympatric in southern China [54]. However, over the past 20 years, R. tanezumi has significantly expanded northward in China and partially replaced the native R. norvegicu [54]. It will be a good example to clarify the adaptive evolution strategy of SEOV in southern and northern China, thus advancing the research of this severe human pathogen.
In our study, the best-fitting time-reversible model of nucleotide substitution was used for each gene segment to minimize the impact of site saturation. However, we still detected mutational saturation in the S segment of SEOV. Former studies showed that high levels of saturation were attained extremely rapidly in RNA virus [35,36]. Mutational saturation in the S segment may lead to incorrect estimation of evolutionary rates and time-scales in our study. For example, Saxenhofer et al. [37] observed strong signals of mutational saturation at different levels of genetic divergence and they demonstrated that mutational saturation was the predominant cause of biases in molecular clock dating in PUUV and TULV [37]. The mean rate of evolutionary change in SEOV was 10−4 substitutions/site/year, which was similar to the rate of other RNA viruses [15,19,21,55]. For instance, the median substitution rate of PUUV was estimated as 2.70 × 10−4 substitutions/site/year [21]. Such a high substitution rate may be associated with the fact that SEOV relies on RNA-dependent RNA polymerase for replication, and lacks proofreading or base-excision repair mechanism [14,15]. Generally, the substitution rate is best described as the long-term rate at which genetic variants become fixed over evolutionary timescales. Hence, this rate reflects the complex interplay of natural selection, genetic drift, modes of transmission, and epidemiological processes [14,15], although sometimes displays a time-dependent bias in rate estimates [35,36,37]. Conclusively, these observations suggest that urban SEOV is evolving substantially as fast as most RNA viruses.
A better understanding of mechanisms that drive viral genetic variation may help us to understand the epidemiology [14,15,19]. The molecular evolution of SEOV has long been overlooked. We found a high level of nucleotide polymorphisms in Guangzhou SEOV. The ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions were very low for L, M, and S segments, indicating that most amino acid changes were deleterious, which would be removed by purifying selection. Thus, amino acid residues are preserved, while allowing near-neutral nucleotide sequences to continue evolving. Previous studies also revealed negative selection in other viruses [56,57,58]. The positive selected codon 66 in the L segment may play an important role among these SEOV recovered from Guangzhou. For TULV in a natural hybrid zone, Saxenhofer et al. (2019) pointed to the positive selected codon 17 in the M segment [59]. These positive selected sites may provide potential basis for the virus evolution. Phylogenetic analyses showed that Guangzhou SEOV clustered together in a single well-supported clade, indicating the genetic specificity of SEOV in Guangzhou. Environmental heterogeneity may shape the evolution of SEOV in Guangzhou. For example, phylogenetic analyses of PUUV typically detect genetic divergence even at relatively small geographical distances [21]. This maybe because RNA viruses exert high evolutionary rates and genetic variability, and those variants which are adapted to different localities will be selected and fixed [21,60].
For many RNA viruses, recombination has been an important feature of their evolution [16,17]. In the present study, the genetic recombination was observed in L and M segments, and the former was first detected in nature. Moreover, GZRn95 and GZRn104 in L segment from the same sampling area had the same breakpoint, although their haplotypes were different. Particularly, GZRn98 was actually a double recombinant, because recombination was detected in L and M segments. These interesting findings are worth studying in the future. Mostowy et al. [61] reported that the “recent recombinations” are determined as those that are present in some subset of strains in a lineage, while the “ancestral recombinations” are determined as those that are present between lineages that affect all strains in the lineage [61]. We detected recombinations only in a few isolates of the Guangzhou strain. Thus, we inferred that these supposed events were recent. In addition, we detected no recombination in the S segment, which differed from another study conducted in Beijing [5]. This might be attributed to the short sequence length of S segments in our study. Classically, viruses that generate persistent rather than acute infections may have high rate of recombination [17]. Each hantavirus species associates closely with rodent species, where the virus establishes a persistent but asymptomatic infection [1,13,62]. Therefore, recombination appears to be a common occurrence in hantaviruses [17]. Recombination could lead to evolutionary changes [16,17]. For example, Xiao et al. [63] demonstrated that recombination accelerated poliovirus adaptation and evolution, and was essential to enrich the population in beneficial mutations and to purge it from deleterious mutations. The recombination of L and M segments might be beneficial for SEOV fitness in Guangzhou, yet, remains to be studied.

5. Conclusions

Urban environments have proven to be favorable for rat population growth and associated zoonoses transmission [9,11]. Our results indicate that the genetic diversity of SEOV is shaped by the combined effects of high evolutionary rate, purifying selection, and recombinationin Guangzhou urban area. Although the number of recovered sequences in our study is limited, our results still provide valuable information of this virus. Such high genetic diversity may have important implications, such as the emergence of SEOV with different transmission abilities or virulence [13,14]. In view of fast urbanization, our study may provide directions for future infectious disease management.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/11/12/1137/s1, Table S1 Primers used to amplify the L, M, and S gene segments of SEOV. Table S2: The GenBank accession number of L, M, and S segments recovered in this study. Table S3: SEOV strains and their GenBank accession number for those sequences used to create L, M, and S segment phylogenetic trees. Table S4: Nucleotide length, best-fit model, and MCMC chain length for each gene segment of SEOV. Figure S1: Bayesian tree of L segment in SEOV from Guangzhou based on the identification primers. Figure S2: Definition of the reduced-age data for L segment. Figure S3. Definition of the reduced-age data for M segment. Figure S4. Definition of the reduced-age data for S segment. Figure S5: Phylogenetic trees of recombination event involved in GZRn95 in L segment. Figure S6: Phylogenetic trees of recombination event involved in GZRn98 in L segment. Figure S7: Phylogenetic trees of recombination event involved in GZRn104 in L segment. Figure S8: Phylogenetic trees of recombination event involved in GZRn92 in M segment. Figure S9: Phylogenetic trees of recombination event involved in GZRn98 in M segment. Figure S10: Phylogenetic trees of recombination event involved in GZRn110 in M segment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.S. and H.H.; formal analysis, Q.S. and Y.C.; funding acquisition, H.H.; methodology, Q.S., Y.C., M.L., J.L., and H.H.; software, Q.S., Y.C., M.L., J.M., and B.W.; writing—original draft, Q.S., Y.C., and H.H.; writing—review and editing, Q.S., Y.C., and H.H.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA19050204), National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFD0501702), National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFD0500303), Beijing Wildlife Rescue Center, China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, China, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CZBZX-1), and Beijing Innovation Consortium of Agriculture Research System (BAIC04-2019).

Acknowledgments

We thank Libiao Zhang and Quansheng Liu for assistance with rat trapping. We thank Gaoming Liu for assistance in statistical advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Easterbrook, J.D.; Klein, S.L. Immunological mechanisms mediating hantavirus persistence in rodent reservoirs. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schönrich, G.; Rang, A.; Lütteke, N.; Raftery, M.J.; Charbonnel, N.; Ulrich, R.G. Hantavirus-induced immunity in rodent reservoirs and humans. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 225, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Muranyi, W.; Bahr, U.; Zeier, M.; van der Woude, F.J. Hantavirus infection. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 3669–3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  4. Zhang, Y.Z.; Zou, Y.; Fu, Z.F.; Plyusnin, A. Hantavirus infections in humans and animals, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zuo, S.Q.; Fang, L.Q.; Zhan, L.; Zhang, P.H.; Jiang, J.F.; Wang, L.P.; Ma, J.Q.; Wang, B.C.; Wang, R.M.; Wu, X.M.; et al. Geo-spatial hotspots of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and genetic characterization of Seoul variants in Beijing, China. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. Liu, J.; Liu, D.Y.; Chen, W.; Li, J.L.; Luo, F.; Li, Q.; Ling, J.X.; Liu, Y.Y.; Xiong, H.R.; Ding, X.H.; et al. Genetic analysis of hantaviruses and their rodent hosts in central-south China. Virus. Res. 2012, 163, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zuo, S.Q.; Li, X.J.; Wang, Z.Q.; Jiang, J.F.; Fang, L.Q.; Zhang, W.H.; Zhang, J.S.; Zhao, Q.M.; Cao, W.C. Genetic diversity and the spatio-temporal analyses of hantaviruses in Shandong province, China. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jonsson, C.B.; Figueiredo, L.T.; Vapalahti, O. A global perspective on hantavirus ecology, epidemiology, and disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 412–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Tian, H.Y.; Hu, S.; Cazelles, B.; Chowell, G.; Gao, L.; Laine, M.; Li, Y.; Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Yang, Q.; et al. Urbanization prolongs hantavirus epidemics in cities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 4707–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Lin, X.D.; Guo, W.P.; Wang, W.; Zou, Y.; Hao, Z.Y.; Zhou, D.J.; Dong, X.; Qu, Y.G.; Li, M.H.; Tian, H.F.; et al. Migration of Norway rats resulted in the worldwide distribution of Seoul hantavirus today. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 972–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Clement, J.; LeDuc, J.W.; Lloyd, G.; Reynes, J.M.; McElhinney, L.; Ranst, M.V.; Lee, H.W. Wild rats, laboratory rats, pet rats: Global Seoul hantavirus disease revisited. Viruses 2019, 11, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  12. Plyusnin, A.; Vapalahti, O.; Vaheri, A. Hantaviruses, genome structure, expression and evolution. J. Gen. Virol. 1996, 77, 2677–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vaheri, A.; Strandin, T.; Hepojoki, J.; Sironen, T.; Henttonen, H.; Mäkelä, S.; Mustonen, J. Uncovering the mysteries of hantavirus infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moya, A.; Holmes, E.C.; González-Candelas, F. The population genetics and evolutionary epidemiology of RNA viruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Duffy, S.; Shackelton, L.A.; Holmes, E.C. Rates of evolutionary change in viruses: Patterns and determinants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Han, G.Z.; Worobey, M. Homologous recombination in negative sense RNA viruses. Viruses 2011, 3, 1358–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Simon-Loriere, E.; Holmes, E.C. Why do RNA viruses recombine? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vijaykrishna, D.; Mukerji, R.; Smith, G.J. RNA virus reassortment: An evolutionary mechanism for host jumps and immune evasion. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Ramsden, C.; Melo, F.L.; Figueiredo, L.M.; Holmes, E.C.; Zanotto, P.M.; The VGDN Consortium. High rates of molecular evolution in hantaviruses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1488–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  20. Castel, G.; Razzauti, M.; Jousselin, E.; Kergoat, G.J.; Cosson, J.F. Changes in diversification patterns and signatures of selection during the evolution of murinae-associated hantaviruses. Viruses 2014, 6, 1112–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Weber Melo, V.; Sheikh Ali, H.; Freise, J.; Kühnert, D.; Essbauer, S.; Mertens, M.; Wanka, K.M.; Drewes, S.; Ulrich, R.G.; Heckel, G. Spatiotemporal dynamics of Puumala hantavirus associated with its rodent host, Myodes glareolus. Evol. Appl. 2015, 8, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  22. Lee, S.H.; Kim, W.K.; No, J.S.; Kim, J.A.; Kim, J.I.; Gu, S.H.; Kim, H.C.; Klein, T.A.; Park, M.S.; Song, J.W. Dynamic circulation and genetic exchange of a shrew-borne hantavirus, Imjin virus, in the Republic of Korea. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  23. Johnson, M.T.J.; Munshi-South, J. Evolution of life in urban environments. Science 2017, 358, eaam8327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Feng, A.Y.T.; Himsworth, C.G. The secret life of the city rat: A review of the ecology of urban Norway and black rats (Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus). Urban. Ecosys. 2014, 17, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Himsworth, C.G.; Parsons, K.L.; Jardine, C.; Patrick, D.M. Rats, cities, people, and pathogens: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of literature regarding the ecology of rat-associated zoonoses in urban centers. Vector. Borne. Zoonotic. Dis. 2013, 13, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Combs, M.; Byers, K.A.; Ghersi, B.M.; Blum, M.J.; Caccone, A. Urban rat races: Spatial population genomics of brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) compared across multiple cities. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2018, 285, 20180245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  27. Wei, Y.H.; Li, X.N.; Wu, X.W.; Tao, X.; Chen, S.Y.; Wang, D.H.; Yang, Z.C. Epidemiological study on the prevalence of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome of Guangzhou City from 2010 to 2014. J. Med. Pest. Control. 2016, 32, 1299–1301. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  28. Wei, Y.H.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.N.; Qin, P.Z.; Lu, Y.; Xu, J.M.; Chen, S.; Li, M.; Yang, Z. Meteorological factors and risk of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Guangzhou, southern China, 2006–2015. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Klempa, B.; Fichet-Calvet, E.; Lecompte, E.; Auste, B.; Aniskin, V.; Meisel, H.; Denys, C.; Koivogui, L.; ter Meulen, J.; Krüger, D.H. Hantavirus in African wood mouse, Guinea. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 838–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Naidu, A.; Fitak, R.R.; Munguia-Vega, A.; Culver, M. Novel PCR primers for complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequencing in mammals. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 12, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Posada, D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Drummond, A.J.; Bouckaert, R.R. Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis with Beast; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A. FigTree: Tree Figure Drawing Tool, v1.4.2; Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hall, B.G. Building phylogenetic trees from molecular data with MEGA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  35. Li, M.; Feng, S.Y.; Lv, S.F.; Luo, J.; Guo, J.L.; Sun, J.H.; He, H.X. Highly pathogenic H5N6 avian influenza virus outbreak in Pavocristatus in Jiangxi Province, China. Emerg. Microbes. Infect. 2019, 8, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  37. Duchêne, S.; Holmes, E.C.; Ho, S.Y.W. Analyses of evolutionary dynamics in viruses are hindered by a time-dependent bias in rate estimates. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014, 281, 20140732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  38. Duchêne, S.; Ho, S.Y.W.; Holmes, E.C. Declining transition/transversion ratios through time reveal limitations to the accuracy of nucleotide substitution models. BMC. Evol. Biol. 2015, 15, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  39. Saxenhofer, M.; Weber de Melo, V.; Ulrich, R.G.; Heckel, G. Revised time scales of RNA virus evolution based on spatial information. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2017, 284, 20170857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  40. Yang, Z.H. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1997, 13, 555–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Z.H.; Nielsen, R. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19, 908–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  42. Dray, S.; Dufour, A.B. The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Softw. 2007, 22, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  43. Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DNASP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  44. Tajima, F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989, 123, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Fu, Y.X.; Li, W.H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 1993, 133, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. McDonald, J.H. Improved tests for heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  47. Pond, S.L.K.; Frost, S.D.W. Datamonkey: Rapid detection of selective pressure on individual sites of codon alignments. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 2531–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martin, D.P.; Murrell, B.; Golden, M.; Khoosal, A.; Muhire, B. RDP4: Detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus. Evol. 2015, 1, vev003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  49. Davis, D.E. The characteristics of rat populations. Q. Rev. Biol. 1953, 28, 373–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Calhoun, J.B. The Ecology and Sociology of the Norway Rat; US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service: Boston, MA, USA, 1963; pp. 94–96.
  51. Klein, S.L.; Bird, B.H.; Nelson, R.J.; Glass, G.E. Environmental and physiological factors associated with Seoul virus infection among urban populations of Norway rats. J. Mammal. 2002, 83, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  52. Vapalahti, O.; Mustonen, J.; Lundkvist, Å.; Henttonen, H.; Plyusnin, A.; Vaheri, A. Hantavirus infections in Europe. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003, 3, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kallio, E.R.; Klingström, J.; Gustafsson, E.; Manni, T.; Vaheri, A.; Henttonen, H.; Vapalahti, O.; Lundkvist, A. Prolonged survival of Puumala hantavirus outside the host: Evidence for indirect transmission via the environment. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 2127–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guo, H.L.; Teng, H.J.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, J.X.; Zhang, Y.H. Asian house rats may facilitate their invasive success through suppressing brown rats in chronic interaction. Front. Zool. 2017, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  55. Lin, X.D.; Wang, W.; Guo, W.P.; Zhang, X.H.; Xing, J.G.; Chen, S.Z.; Li, M.H.; Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Plyusnin, A.; et al. Cross-species transmission in the speciation of the currently known Murinae-associated hantaviruses. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 11171–11182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  56. Holmes, E.C.; Woelk, C.H.; Kassis, R.; Bourhy, H. Genetic constraints and the adaptive evolution of rabies virus in nature. Virology 2002, 292, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  57. Lequime, S.; Fontaine, A.; ArGouilh, M.; Moltini-Conclois, I.; Lambrechts, L. Genetic drift, purifying selection and vector genotype shape dengue virus intra-host genetic diversity in mosquitoes. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhou, N.; Zhou, L.; Wang, B. Molecular evolution of classic human Astrovirus, as revealed by the analysis of the capsid protein gene. Viruses 2019, 11, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  59. Saxenhofer, M.; Schmidt, S.; Ulrich, R.G.; Heckel, G. Secondary contact between diverged host lineages entails ecological speciation in a European hantavirus. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  60. Moya, A.; Elena, S.F.; Bracho, A.; Rosario, M.; Eladio, B. The evolution of RNA viruses: A population genetics view. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6967–6973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  61. Mostowy, R.; Croucher, N.J.; Andam, C.P.; Corander, J.; Hanage, W.P.; Marttinen, P. Efficient inference of recent and ancestral recombination within bacterial populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 1167–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  62. Meyer, B.J.; Schmaljohn, C.S. Persistent hantavirus infections: Characteristics and mechanisms. Trends. Microbiol. 2000, 8, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  63. Xiao, Y.; Rouzine, I.M.; Bianco, S.; Acevedo, A.; Goldstein, E.F.; Farkov, M.; Brodsky, L.; Andino, R. RNA recombination enhances adaptability and is required for virus spread and virulence. Cell. Host. Microbe 2017, 22, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Viruses 11 01137 g001 550
Figure 1. Sample collection sites, positive and negative rat distributions in Guangzhou city. Sample collection sites were represented by dots colored according to the infection status. Map was obtained from the Chinese Academy of Surveying & Mapping.
Figure 1. Sample collection sites, positive and negative rat distributions in Guangzhou city. Sample collection sites were represented by dots colored according to the infection status. Map was obtained from the Chinese Academy of Surveying & Mapping.
Viruses 11 01137 g001
Viruses 11 01137 g002 550
Figure 2. Maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree of the large (L) segment in SEOV in Guangzhou. The tree was built using BEAST v1.8.4 and illustrated using FigTree v1.4.2. Posterior probabilities of major nodes were indicated.
Figure 2. Maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree of the large (L) segment in SEOV in Guangzhou. The tree was built using BEAST v1.8.4 and illustrated using FigTree v1.4.2. Posterior probabilities of major nodes were indicated.
Viruses 11 01137 g002
Viruses 11 01137 g003 550
Figure 3. MCC tree of the medium (M) segment in SEOV in Guangzhou. The tree was built using BEAST v1.8.4 and illustrated using FigTree v1.4.2. Posterior probabilities of major nodes were indicated.
Figure 3. MCC tree of the medium (M) segment in SEOV in Guangzhou. The tree was built using BEAST v1.8.4 and illustrated using FigTree v1.4.2. Posterior probabilities of major nodes were indicated.
Viruses 11 01137 g003
Viruses 11 01137 g004 550
Figure 4. MCC tree of the small (S) segment in SEOV in Guangzhou. The tree was built using BEAST v1.8.4 and illustrated using FigTree v1.4.2. Posterior probabilities of major nodes were indicated.
Figure 4. MCC tree of the small (S) segment in SEOV in Guangzhou. The tree was built using BEAST v1.8.4 and illustrated using FigTree v1.4.2. Posterior probabilities of major nodes were indicated.
Viruses 11 01137 g004
Table
Table 1. Detection of Seoul virus (SEOV) in rats from Guangzhou.
Table 1. Detection of Seoul virus (SEOV) in rats from Guangzhou.
CategorySubcategoryPositive (%) n = 43Negative (%) n = 86P
SexMale24 (55.81)44 (51.16)0.804
Female19 (44.19)42 (48.84)
SpeciesR. norvegicus41 (95.35)73 (84.88)0.082
R. tanezumi2 (4.65)13 (15.12)
Weight (g)Median339.43258.12**
** P < 0.01.
Table
Table 2. Estimated evolutionary rates of each gene segment of SEOV by Bayesian analysis.
Table 2. Estimated evolutionary rates of each gene segment of SEOV by Bayesian analysis.
CategoriesSubstitution Rate and 95% HPD (Substitution/Site/Year)
MeanLowerUpper
L complete data set6.2741 × 10−43.8152 × 10−48.7360 × 10−4
subset I1.5114 × 10−31.1170 × 10−31.9035 × 10−3
subset II1.6653 × 10−31.1053 × 10−32.2836 × 10−3
M complete data set2.0631 × 10−41.2591 × 10−42.9082 × 10−4
subset I2.3236 × 10−49.9816 × 10−54.0076 × 10−4
subset II2.4408 × 10−49.2609 × 10−54.4428 × 10−4
S complete data set4.2126 × 10−42.1798 × 10−46.1856 × 10−4
subset I3.7663 × 10−41.8639 × 10−45.9634 × 10−4
subset II2.7569 × 10−41.1684 × 10−44.3243 × 10−4
Table
Table 3. The estimated divergence time of each gene segment from its time to the most recent common ancestors (TMRCA).
Table 3. The estimated divergence time of each gene segment from its time to the most recent common ancestors (TMRCA).
CategoriesEstimated Divergence Time95% HPD
LowerUpper
L complete data set200719902015
subset I201420112016
subset II201320092017
M complete data set193718951970
subset I194218901988
subset II194318771991
S complete data set199319742008
subset I199119692008
subset II198419482004
Table
Table 4. Mutational saturation parameters determined for L, M, and S segment.
Table 4. Mutational saturation parameters determined for L, M, and S segment.
CategoriesNti/tvdN/dSGCα
L complete data set547.578380.027680.374010.13075
subset I457.305200.026730.373970.11973
subset II387.330460.030150.373590.05750
M complete data set728.074400.037180.401370.15019
subset I588.229770.037350.401290.11013
subset II488.248770.036330.401470.10923
S complete data set783.800600.098890.457900.52316
subset I665.856860.057480.457370.15095
subset II5510.359460.030090.456890.03428
N—number of sequences; ti/tv—transition/transversion ratio; dN/dS—ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions per site; GC—GC-content; α—shape parameter of the gamma distribution of among-site rate variation.
Table
Table 5. Genetic analyses at L, M, and S segments of SEOV in Guangzhou.
Table 5. Genetic analyses at L, M, and S segments of SEOV in Guangzhou.
GeneLMS
Number282828
Fragment size (bp)62883402903
SNP21416033
Number of haplotype18207
Haplotype diversity0.9550.9600.815
π0.0100.0140.010
θw0.0080.0120.009
Tajima’s D−0.109−0.099−0.105
Fu-Li D *−0.111−0.092−0.082
Fu-Li F *−0.129−0.116−0.106
McDonald-Kreitman (NI)2.212 *2.5901.100
* P < 0.05.
Table
Table 6. Tests of positive selection by different methods.
Table 6. Tests of positive selection by different methods.
GeneNumber of SegmentsTest of SelectionSites Under Selection Identified by Different Methods
ωInL M7lnL M82lnDLSignificancePAML M8FELSLACFUBAR
L280.039−10011.688−10009.0355.307*66nonenone66, 150, 753
M280.049−5715.383−5713.8982.969NSnonenonenone90
S280.035−1426.349−1426.3500.003NSnonenonenonenone
NS—not significant; none—no positive site was detected; * P < 0.05.
Table
Table 7. Recombination statistics of L and M segments of SEOV in Guangzhou.
Table 7. Recombination statistics of L and M segments of SEOV in Guangzhou.
GeneLM
NumberGZRn95GZRn98GZRn104GZRn92GZRn98GZRn110
Breakpoint5578, 628889, 9035578, 62882129, 2714550, 1731598, 1472
RDPRCS0.5700.6870.6090.7080.5610.661
RDPNSNSNSNS**NS
GENECONV************
BootScanNS**NSNSNS**
MaxChi**NS**NS****
Chimaera**NS**NS****
SiScan**NS********
3Seq**NS********
NS—not significant; ** P < 0.01.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, Q.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Ma, J.; Wang, B.; Luo, J.; He, H. Genetic Characterization and Molecular Evolution of Urban Seoul Virus in Southern China. Viruses 2019, 11, 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11121137

AMA Style

Su Q, Chen Y, Li M, Ma J, Wang B, Luo J, He H. Genetic Characterization and Molecular Evolution of Urban Seoul Virus in Southern China. Viruses. 2019; 11(12):1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11121137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Qianqian, Yi Chen, Meng Li, Jiajun Ma, Bo Wang, Jing Luo, and Hongxuan He. 2019. "Genetic Characterization and Molecular Evolution of Urban Seoul Virus in Southern China" Viruses 11, no. 12: 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11121137

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop