Next Article in Journal
Advancing Ecosystem Recovery with Diverse Species Plantings in Tropical Forest Restoration
Previous Article in Journal
Dimensional Stability and Mechanical Performance of Exterior-Grade Particleboard and MDF After Accelerated Aging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Exogenous Hormone Treatments on Seed Germination and Transcriptome Analysis in Zelkova schneideriana

1
College of Forestry, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
2
Hunan Provincial Academy of Forestry, Changsha 410004, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Changsha 410004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2026, 17(5), 616; https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050616
Submission received: 5 April 2026 / Revised: 7 May 2026 / Accepted: 14 May 2026 / Published: 19 May 2026

Abstract

Poor seed germination severely limits the propagation and conservation of Zelkova schneideriana (Chinese zelkova). However, the comparative effects of different exogenous phytohormones on seed germination of this species and the associated molecular responses remain insufficiently understood. To evaluate the effects of exogenous phytohormones on seed germination and to explore the underlying molecular basis, a germination experiment was conducted from January to March 2024 at Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China, in which seeds were treated with different concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA; 20, 40, and 80 mg/L), gibberellic acid (GA3; 125, 250, and 500 mg/L), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA; 100, 200, and 300 mg/L), brassinolide (BR; 10, 20, and 30 mg/L), and abscisic acid (ABA; 50, 100, and 150 mg/L). Germination traits were assessed, and transcriptome sequencing was performed for the BR treatment showing the strongest promotive effect. The results demonstrate that exogenous hormones exerted distinct regulatory effects on seed germination, among which BR at 10 mg/L showed the strongest promotive effect, increasing the final germination rate at 40 d from 50% in the control to 68%, whereas higher concentrations caused inhibitory effects. Transcriptome analysis identified 169 differentially expressed genes between BR-treated seeds and the control, mainly associated with reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, redox regulation, energy and carbohydrate metabolism, and plant hormone- and MAPK-related signaling pathways. Antioxidant enzyme assays showed that BR10 increased POD activity but decreased SOD, CAT, APX, and GR activities. Endogenous hormone-related analysis further revealed marked BL accumulation and significant decreases in ACC, GA3, GA4, IAA, JA, and SA. Overall, exogenous BR promotes seed germination of Z. schneideriana through coordinated physiological and molecular regulation, providing a useful basis for seed pretreatment and seedling propagation.

1. Introduction

Zelkova schneideriana Hand.-Mazz. is a rare native tree species belonging to the genus Zelkova in the family Ulmaceae [1,2,3,4]. As an endangered broad-leaved tree distributed mainly in subtropical mountainous regions of China, it occupies important ecological niches in mixed forest communities and contributes to soil and water conservation, ecological restoration, and habitat stability. It also possesses considerable economic and cultural value. Economically, Z. schneideriana is regarded as a high-quality timber species because of its desirable wood properties, which make it suitable for furniture, interior decoration, and other wood products. In addition, its ornamental characteristics and environmental adaptability also make it a promising species for urban landscaping and greening. Therefore, efficient propagation and seedling production of this species are of considerable practical importance. However, owing to long-term anthropogenic disturbance, limited natural regeneration capacity [5,6], and low reproductive efficiency, wild populations of Z. schneideriana have continuously declined. As a result, this species has been listed as a nationally protected plant, highlighting the urgent need for efficient artificial propagation technologies to support its conservation and sustainable utilization.
Seed propagation is the primary approach for large-scale seedling production and germplasm multiplication of Z. schneideriana. However, its seeds are commonly characterized by a high proportion of empty shells, low germination rates, and asynchronous germination, which severely restrict seedling establishment and production efficiency [7,8]. Previous studies have suggested that seed germination in woody plants is often affected by seed coat constraints, dormancy type, endogenous hormone balance, stratification conditions, and exogenous growth regulators [9,10,11,12,13,14]. For Z. schneideriana, recent work has provided useful information on seed germination and seedling establishment based on integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses [5]. These studies provide an important basis for understanding the germination limitations of this species. However, systematic comparisons of different exogenous phytohormones and the physiological and transcriptomic responses associated with the most effective hormone treatment remain insufficiently understood.
Among plant hormones, gibberellins, auxins, cytokinins, and abscisic acid are widely recognized as key regulators of seed dormancy release and germination processes [9,10,11]. In addition to these classical hormones, brassinosteroids (BRs), a class of steroidal phytohormones, have emerged as important regulators of plant growth and development. Accumulating evidence indicates that BRs not only promote cell elongation and enhance stress tolerance, but also regulate seed germination [12,13,14]. Previous studies have also shown that seed germination is often controlled by hormonal crosstalk, such as interactions among ABA, GA, auxin, cytokinin, and BR-related signaling pathways [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Therefore, combined hormone treatments may theoretically produce additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effects during seed germination. However, because the response of Z. schneideriana seeds to individual exogenous phytohormones remains insufficiently understood, it is necessary to first compare the effects of single-hormone treatments before further evaluating combined hormone applications.
With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies, transcriptome analysis has become an important approach for elucidating molecular responses during seed germination [15,16,17]. Previous studies in different plant species have shown that genes involved in cell wall remodeling, energy metabolism, hormone signal transduction, and redox regulation are commonly associated with germination. For Z. schneideriana, previous work has provided useful information on seed germination and seedling establishment [5], and related studies have also described germination constraints and dormancy characteristics in woody plant seeds [7,8,9,10,11]. However, it remains unclear which exogenous phytohormone is most effective in promoting seed germination of this species and how the most effective treatment is associated with physiological and transcriptomic responses. This knowledge gap forms the basis for the assumptions and experimental design of the present study.
Based on the above research background, this study aimed to further clarify the effects of exogenous phytohormones on seed germination of Z. schneideriana and to identify the hormone treatment with the strongest promotive effect. Five commonly used exogenous phytohormones, namely 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA), gibberellic acid (GA3), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), brassinolide (BR), and abscisic acid (ABA), were compared. Because previous studies have shown that different phytohormones play distinct roles in seed dormancy release and germination regulation, and that BRs can promote seed germination and early seedling development through interactions with hormone signaling, redox regulation, and metabolic processes, we expected that the tested hormones would exert different effects on seed germination and that BR treatment would show a relatively strong promotive effect. Therefore, after identifying BR10 as the most effective treatment, we further analyzed transcriptomic changes, antioxidant enzyme activities, and endogenous hormone profiles under CK and BR10 treatments. Compared with previous studies that mainly described germination constraints, dormancy-related traits, or seedling establishment in Z. schneideriana, the present study demonstrates the comparative effects of different exogenous hormones and provides preliminary physiological and molecular evidence for BR-promoted germination in this species. Although combined hormone treatments were not included in the present experimental design, the results of single-hormone screening provide a necessary basis for future studies evaluating possible additive or synergistic effects of combined BR, GA, or other hormone treatments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Seeds of Z. schneideriana were collected in mid-November 2023 from the Taoyuandong National Nature Reserve, Yanling County, Hunan Province, China (26°49′ N, 113°57′ E; altitude 2000 ± 50 m). The study area is located in a mid-subtropical montane region with a humid monsoon climate. According to local meteorological records, the annual mean temperature ranges from 12.1 to 17.2 °C, with an extreme maximum temperature of 39.1 °C and an extreme minimum temperature of −9.3 °C. The annual precipitation is approximately 1761.5 mm. Seeds were obtained from a naturally regenerated wild population exhibiting good growth conditions. Previous molecular marker analyses indicated a high level of genetic variation in this population, with the percentage of polymorphic loci (PPL) exceeding 82%. The maternal trees were estimated to be 80–120 years old and met the requirements for Class I seed sources according to the Rules for Forest Seed Testing (GB 2772-1999) [19].
Following collection, seeds were visually examined and manually sorted to remove malformed or mechanically damaged individuals. Only seeds with intact seed coats and relatively uniform size were retained for subsequent experiments (1000-seed weight: 23.6 ± 0.8 g; length-to-width ratio: 1.62 ± 0.03). The selected seeds were then subjected to cold stratification at 4 °C in darkness for 60 days to facilitate the release of physiological dormancy.
The exogenous phytohormones applied in this study included 6-BA, GA3, IAA, BR, and ABA. All reagents were of analytical grade and were obtained from Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

2.2. Experimental Methods

2.2.1. Seed Treatments of Zelkova schneideriana

Before hormone treatment, stratified seeds were washed with tap water, and floating empty seeds were removed. The retained seeds were surface-sterilized in a 10% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution for 10 min under gentle agitation [18], and then rinsed 7–8 times with sterile distilled water to remove residual disinfectant.
All instruments involved in the experiment, including forceps, beakers, and germination boxes, were autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 min to maintain aseptic conditions. According to the experimental scheme, solutions of 6-BA, GA3, IAA, BR, and ABA were prepared at the prescribed concentrations. The concentration gradients of the five exogenous phytohormones were determined based on previously published studies and preliminary experiments, taking into account the physiological characteristics of Z. schneideriana seeds [20,21,22,23,24]. Sterilized seeds were immersed in the respective hormone solutions for 1 h, while seeds treated with sterile water were used as the water-treated control (CK). Following treatment, seeds were rinsed 5–6 times with sterile water to remove residual hormones, and then labeled and assigned to the corresponding treatment groups. A completely randomized design (CRD) was employed, and seeds were randomly allocated to each treatment and germination box to minimize positional and environmental effects (Table 1).
Each treatment comprised 100 seeds with three independent biological replicates. Seeds were evenly distributed in germination boxes containing absorbent cotton moistened with sterile water and incubated in a growth chamber set at 25 °C with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod [25]. Seeds were incubated under a light regime to provide a uniform germination environment and to simulate routine nursery conditions; however, the specific requirement of light for seed germination was not evaluated in this study. Throughout the incubation period, substrate moisture was maintained by adding sterile water when necessary. Germination was monitored for 40 days, and a seed was considered germinated when the radicle protruded through the seed coat [26]. The germination rate was calculated according to Equation (1) [27]:
G e r m i n a t i o n   r a t e % = n u m b e r   o f   g e r m i n a t e d   s e e d s t o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   s e e d s × 100
All experimental procedures were carried out under strictly controlled sterile conditions to ensure consistency and reliability of the results.

2.2.2. Determination of Antioxidant Enzyme Activities Under CK and BR10 Treatments

Among the five exogenous phytohormone treatments, BR10, which showed the strongest promotive effect on seed germination, was selected together with the water-treated control (CK) for antioxidant enzyme assays. Bud tissues were collected from normally germinated seedlings at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment. To reduce developmental heterogeneity, only seedlings with radicle protrusion and comparable early seedling morphology were sampled, and three independent biological replicates were included for each treatment. Fresh samples were immediately homogenized on ice and used for the determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR) activities [28].
Antioxidant enzyme activities were determined using commercial assay kits according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Specifically, GR activity was measured using the Norminkoda kit NMW0428, APX activity using NMW0404, POD activity using NMK0004, SOD activity using NMW0101, and CAT activity using NMK0006 (Norminkoda (Wuhan) Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). For GR and SOD assays, approximately 0.1 g of fresh bud tissue was homogenized in 1.0 mL PBS under ice-bath conditions and centrifuged, and the supernatant was used for analysis. For APX assay, approximately 0.1 g tissue was homogenized in 1.0 mL extraction buffer and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 20 min. For POD assay, approximately 0.05 g tissue was homogenized in 0.5 mL PBS and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. CAT extracts were prepared in diluted PBS buffer according to the kit protocol. All measurements were performed using a microplate reader.
The measurement principles and wavelengths were as follows: GR activity was determined by monitoring the decrease in NADPH absorbance at 340 nm; APX activity was determined from the oxidation rate of ascorbic acid at 290 nm; POD activity was determined by a probe-based method at 570 nm; SOD activity was measured using the WST-8 method at 450 nm; and CAT activity was determined based on H2O2 decomposition using a probe-based method at 570 nm. Enzyme activities were calculated according to the corresponding kit formulas and expressed on a fresh-weight basis as U·g−1 FW [29].

2.2.3. Determination of Endogenous Hormone Contents Under CK and BR10 Treatments

To further characterize hormone-related responses under BR treatment, endogenous hormones and hormone-related metabolites were determined in bud tissues collected from normally germinated CK and BR10 seedlings at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment. Four independent biological replicates were analyzed for each treatment, and the same sampling criterion described above was used to reduce developmental heterogeneity. Targeted metabolite profiling was performed for a broad range of hormone-related compounds, including BR, GA, ABA, auxin, cytokinin, jasmonate, salicylate, and ethylene-related metabolites [30].
For metabolite extraction, each solid sample was ground twice in liquid nitrogen (50 Hz, 30 s each). Approximately 100 mg of tissue was transferred into an Eppendorf tube and extracted with 1000 μL of precooled acetonitrile–methanol (1:1, v/v) containing an isotopically labeled internal standard mixture [31]. The samples were vortexed for 60 s, sonicated in an ice-water bath for 10 min, incubated at −40 °C for 2 h, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm and 4 °C for 15 min. A 900 μL aliquot of the supernatant was dried, reconstituted with 90 μL of 50% methanol in water, vortexed for 60 s, ultrasonically mixed for 120 s, vortexed again for 60 s, and centrifuged twice at 12,000 rpm and 4 °C for 10 min. Finally, 70 μL of the clear supernatant was transferred into an autosampler vial for UHPLC-MS/MS analysis.
Endogenous hormones were quantified using an ExionLC™ AD UHPLC system (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) coupled to a QTRAP 6500+ mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source operated in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Kinetex C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 2.6 μm). The mobile phases consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in methanol (B). The column temperature was maintained at 25 °C, the autosampler temperature at 4 °C, and the injection volume was 2 μL. The ion source parameters were set as follows: Ion Spray Voltage, ±4500 V; Ion Source Gas 1, 50 psi; Ion Source Gas 2, 50 psi; source temperature, 450 °C; and Curtain Gas, 40/35 psi. Data acquisition and metabolite quantification were performed using Analyst 1.7.3 and Biotree Biobud v2.0.3 software.
Calibration solutions were prepared from mixed standard stock solutions containing corresponding isotopically labeled internal standards. Quantification was based on calibration curves in which the ratio of the target analyte peak area to that of the internal standard was plotted against analyte concentration [32]. Calibration points with an accuracy outside the range of 80%–120% were excluded. The lower limits of detection (LLOD) and lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) were determined according to signal-to-noise ratios of 3 and 10, respectively.

2.2.4. RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Among the five hormone treatments, BR10, which showed the strongest promotive effect on seed germination of Z. schneideriana, was selected for transcriptome analysis, with the water-treated group serving as the CK. RNA-seq samples were collected at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment, consistent with the sampling stage used for antioxidant enzyme and endogenous hormone-related metabolite analyses. For each biological replicate, bud tissues from 50 normally germinated seedlings with radicle protrusion and comparable early seedling morphology were randomly pooled. Three independent biological replicates were prepared for each treatment.
The collected bud tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. This sampling strategy was used to reduce developmental heterogeneity among samples. Nevertheless, because germination occurred asynchronously during the 40-day incubation period, these transcriptomic and biochemical data should be interpreted as reflecting the physiological and molecular status of germinated seedlings at the end of the incubation period, rather than the immediate events at the onset of radicle protrusion.
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by DNase treatment to remove residual genomic DNA. RNA quantity and purity were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer, and RNA integrity was evaluated by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis and RNA quality number (RQN) assessment with an Agilent 5300 system [33]. Only RNA samples meeting the quality requirements were used for subsequent library preparation.
cDNA libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit with 5 μg of total RNA per sample and sequenced in paired-end mode on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China) [34]. Following sequencing, downstream sample-level analyses, including principal component analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation analysis, were performed to evaluate biological reproducibility and overall transcriptomic relationships among samples [35]. Detailed statistical procedures are described in Section 2.2.7.

2.2.5. Transcriptome Data Analysis and Gene Functional Annotation

Raw sequencing reads were first processed using fastp v0.23.4 to remove adaptor contamination and low-quality sequences, resulting in clean reads suitable for downstream analyses. The completeness of the transcriptome data was evaluated using BUSCO v3.0.2 (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs), and sequencing quality indicators, including Q20, Q30, and GC content, were calculated. To further enhance data reliability, the assembled transcripts were additionally screened using TransRate v1.0.3 and CD-HIT v4.5.7 to identify and exclude potentially low-quality or redundant sequences.
De novo transcriptome assembly was conducted for all samples using Trinity v2.8.5, and a reference transcriptome was generated. Functional annotation of unigene sequences was carried out by sequence similarity searches against multiple public databases, including NR database v2023.07, Swiss-Prot database v2023.11, Pfam database v36.0, eggNOG database v2020.06, Gene Ontology (GO) database v2023.07, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database v2023.09, using DIAMOND v2.1.9 or BLAST+ v2.9.0.

2.2.6. Differentially Expressed Gene Analysis

Clean reads were mapped to the assembled reference transcriptome using Bowtie2 v2.5.4, and gene expression levels were quantified using RSEM v1.3.1. Expression abundance was normalized and reported as transcripts per million (TPM). Differential expression analysis between treatments was performed using the DESeq2 package v1.42.0. Genes with a false discovery rate (FDR) below 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold change (|log2FC|) of at least 1 were defined as significantly differentially expressed.
To explore the biological functions of the identified DEGs, GO functional enrichment and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were subsequently performed. During enrichment analysis, multiple testing correction was applied using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to control the false-positive rate.

2.2.7. Statistical Analysis

Germination data were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) of three independent biological replicates. Differences in germination rate among treatments were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s multiple range test for multiple comparisons. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
For transcriptome data, principal component analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation analysis were performed based on the normalized gene expression matrix to evaluate overall sample relationships and biological reproducibility among the six RNA-seq libraries. Prior to PCA, the normalized expression data were log2-transformed. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated among all samples and visualized as a correlation heatmap. In addition, hierarchical clustering analysis was performed based on the normalized expression profiles, and the clustering results were displayed as a heatmap to assess similarity among treatments and biological replicates.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Different Exogenous Phytohormone Treatments on the Germination Rate of Zelkova schneideriana Seeds

The effects of different exogenous phytohormone treatments on the germination rate of Z. schneideriana seeds are shown in Figure 1. In general, germination rates increased from 30 to 40 d in all treatments, but clear differences were observed among hormone types and concentrations.
The 6-BA treatments showed a moderate promotive effect on seed germination. At 30 d, germination rates remained low under all 6-BA treatments, and no clear significant advantage was observed among the tested 6-BA concentrations. At 35 and 40 d, germination rates increased further. Among the 6-BA treatments, 6-BA40 generally showed a stronger effect than 6-BA80 and produced significantly higher germination rates than the control at some incubation times, whereas 6-BA80 showed a weaker or non-significant effect compared with the control.
Among all hormone treatments, BR showed the strongest promotive effect on seed germination. At 30 d, both BR10 and BR20 significantly increased germination rates compared with the control, whereas BR30 showed a weaker effect. At 35 and 40 d, BR10 consistently produced the highest germination rates among all BR treatments. In contrast, BR30 resulted in lower germination rates than BR10 and BR20, and at some time points was even lower than the control, indicating a clear concentration-dependent effect of BR.
GA treatments also promoted seed germination, although their effects were weaker than those of BR treatments. At 30 d, GA500 showed a higher germination rate than the lower GA concentrations, with significant differences among some GA treatments. At 35 and 40 d, germination rates increased further in all GA treatments, and GA500 produced significantly higher germination rates than the control at some incubation times. However, the differences among GA concentrations were less distinct than those observed among BR treatments.
IAA treatments showed limited promotive effects on seed germination. At 30 d, germination rates under IAA100, IAA200, and IAA300 were not significantly different from the control. At 35 and 40 d, germination rates increased gradually, and some IAA treatments showed higher germination rates than the control; however, the differences among IAA concentrations were generally not significant. These results indicate that IAA had a limited and mostly non-significant promotive effect compared with BR.
In contrast, ABA significantly inhibited seed germination throughout the incubation period. At 30 d, germination rates under ABA50, ABA100, and ABA150 were all significantly lower than those of the control and decreased with increasing ABA concentration. At 35 and 40 d, germination rates increased in all groups, but the ABA-treated seeds still remained significantly lower than the control. Among them, ABA150 showed the strongest inhibitory effect.
Overall, the five exogenous phytohormones showed distinct regulatory effects on seed germination. BR10 produced the strongest and statistically significant promotive effect, whereas ABA150 showed the strongest and statistically significant inhibitory effect. GA and 6-BA produced moderate promotive effects at some concentrations or incubation times, while IAA showed limited and mostly non-significant promotive effects compared with BR.

3.2. Quality Assessment of Transcriptome Sequencing Data

The transcriptome sequencing data showed high quality across all samples, with low error rates, high Q20 and Q30 values, stable GC contents, and mapping ratios above 89% (Table 2), indicating that the data were suitable for subsequent analyses.
The assembled transcripts were mainly concentrated in the 200–500 bp range, with transcript numbers decreasing as sequence length increased (Figure 2), suggesting an acceptable assembly profile for downstream annotation.
PCA clearly separated the CK and BR10 groups, while biological replicates within each treatment clustered closely together (Figure 3a). Pearson correlation analysis showed high correlations among replicates, with coefficients above 0.95 (Figure 3b), indicating good biological reproducibility and reliable transcriptomic differences between CK and BR10.

3.3. Functional Annotation of Expressed Genes

A total of 53,541 unigenes and 95,970 transcripts were obtained, of which 30,137 unigenes and 62,374 transcripts were annotated in at least one public database (Table 3). Among the six databases, NR showed the highest annotation coverage, followed by GO and eggNOG, providing a basis for subsequent functional analysis.
GO classification showed that annotated genes were mainly assigned to the categories of biological process, cellular component, and molecular function (Figure 4), Within these categories, genes related to cellular and metabolic processes, membrane-associated components, and binding or catalytic activities were highly represented, suggesting active metabolic and cellular regulation during seed germination.
eggNOG classification further indicated that the annotated genes were widely involved in transcription, translation, signal transduction, substance transport, and metabolism (Figure 5). In particular, categories related to transcription, post-translational modification and protein turnover, energy production and conversion, and carbohydrate metabolism were well represented.
KEGG classification showed that annotated genes were mainly enriched in metabolic pathways, followed by pathways associated with genetic information processing and environmental information processing (Figure 6). Together, these results indicate that the Z. schneideriana transcriptome covers a broad range of biological functions related to seed germination and early development.
Comparative transcriptomic analysis identified clear differences in gene expression between CK and BR10, with a set of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) detected between the two groups (Figure 7). These DEGs provided the basis for subsequent enrichment analysis of BR-responsive pathways in Z. schneideriana.

3.4. GO and KEGG Enrichment Analyses

To clarify the biological significance of BR-responsive transcriptional changes, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed using DEGs identified between CK and BR10. DEG clustering further showed distinct expression patterns between the two groups, while biological replicates within each treatment remained highly similar (Figure 8).
GO enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly enriched in terms related to redox regulation, including hydrogen peroxide metabolism, reactive oxygen species metabolism, peroxidase activity, and oxidoreductase activity (Figure 9), suggesting that BR10 may affect redox homeostasis during germination.
KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly involved in metabolism- and signal transduction-related pathways, including secondary metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, plant hormone signal transduction, and MAPK signaling (Figure 10). Together, these results suggest that BR10-responsive DEGs are associated with redox regulation, metabolic activity, and hormone- and MAPK-related signaling during seed germination in Z. schneideriana. To provide more specific information beyond pathway-level enrichment, we further examined representative DEGs associated with redox metabolism and hormone-related signaling. Several DEGs were annotated as peroxidase-, oxidoreductase-, glutathione-related, and ROS metabolism-related genes, which were consistent with the enrichment of hydrogen peroxide metabolism, reactive oxygen species metabolism, peroxidase activity, and oxidoreductase activity. In addition, DEGs associated with plant hormone signal transduction and MAPK signaling were also identified, suggesting that BR10 treatment may affect both redox-related processes and hormone-mediated signaling responses. Although these candidate genes were not validated by qRT-PCR in the present study, they provide useful targets for future validation and functional analysis.
To provide more specific examples from the DEG dataset, representative DEGs related to redox metabolism and hormone-related signaling were further selected and summarized in Table 4. These genes were mainly annotated as peroxidase-, catalase-peroxidase-, glutathione metabolism-, oxidoreductase-, ethylene-responsive-, salicylate-related-, calcium signaling-, and WRKY transcription factor-related genes.

3.5. Changes in Antioxidant Enzyme Activities Under CK and BR10 Treatments

As shown in Table 5, significant differences in antioxidant enzyme activities were observed in the bud tissues of Zelkova schneideriana under CK and BR10 treatments at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment. Compared with the CK, BR10 significantly decreased the activities of SOD, CAT, APX, and GR, while significantly increasing POD activity (p < 0.05). Specifically, SOD activity decreased from 146.06 ± 5.01 U·g−1 to 119.97 ± 7.26 U·g−1, CAT activity decreased from 0.662 ± 0.001 U·g−1 to 0.356 ± 0.001 U·g−1, APX activity decreased from 0.562 ± 0.014 U·g−1 to 0.478 ± 0.016 U·g−1, and GR activity decreased from 0.602 ± 0.036 U·g−1 to 0.204 ± 0.006 U·g−1. In contrast, POD activity increased significantly from 0.340 ± 0.014 U·g−1 to 0.486 ± 0.021 U·g−1. These results indicate that BR10 markedly altered the antioxidant enzyme activity pattern in bud tissues and had a pronounced effect on the antioxidant defense system of Z. schneideriana.

3.6. Changes in Endogenous Hormones and Hormone-Related Metabolites Under CK and BR10 Treatments

As shown in Table 6, the contents of representative endogenous hormones and hormone-related metabolites in the bud tissues of Zelkova schneideriana changed significantly under CK and BR10 treatments at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment. Compared with the CK, BR10 treatment significantly increased BL content from 348.37 ± 23.46 nmol·L−1 to 23,215.08 ± 522.59 nmol·L−1 (p < 0.05). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in ABA content between the two treatments, with values of 66.26 ± 1.85 nmol·L−1 and 65.99 ± 1.21 nmol·L−1 under CK and BR10, respectively. In addition to BL, BR10 significantly reduced the levels of several hormones, hormone precursors, or signaling-related metabolites, including ACC, GA3, GA4, IAA, JA, and SA (p < 0.05). Specifically, ACC decreased from 3434.54 ± 223.11 nmol·L−1 to 1806.64 ± 33.90 nmol·L−1, GA3 decreased from 14.68 ± 0.84 nmol·L−1 to 7.98 ± 0.36 nmol·L−1, GA4 decreased from 16.36 ± 0.19 nmol·L−1 to 9.92 ± 0.32 nmol·L−1, IAA decreased from 86.82 ± 3.10 nmol·L−1 to 60.60 ± 2.93 nmol·L−1, JA decreased from 311.54 ± 9.17 nmol·L−1 to 96.01 ± 1.15 nmol·L−1, and SA decreased from 3870.95 ± 194.36 nmol·L−1 to 2439.40 ± 94.72 nmol·L−1. Overall, BR10 treatment markedly reshaped the endogenous hormone-related metabolic profile in bud tissues, characterized by a dramatic accumulation of BL and significant reductions in several hormones, hormone precursors, and signaling-related metabolites associated with growth regulation and stress responses.

4. Discussion

4.1. Differential Effects of Exogenous Phytohormones on Seed Germination of Zelkova schneideriana

Seed germination is regulated by a complex hormonal network, and exogenous phytohormone application can either promote or inhibit this process depending on hormone type, concentration, and seed physiological status [36]. In the present study, BR10 showed the strongest promotive effect on Z. schneideriana seed germination, whereas ABA150 showed the strongest inhibitory effect. GA and 6-BA produced moderate promotive effects at some concentrations or incubation times, while IAA showed limited and mostly non-significant promotive effects compared with BR. These results indicate that Z. schneideriana seeds respond differently to distinct hormone classes.
The strong promotive effect of BR observed in this study is consistent with reports on cotton, where brassinosteroid seed priming promoted germination and seedling growth [37]. However, BR effects are not universally positive or linear. In Scots pine, brassinosteroid application showed condition-dependent effects on seed germination, especially under standard and heat-stress conditions [38]. This agrees with our observation that BR30 was less effective than BR10, suggesting that BR-mediated germination promotion depends on an appropriate concentration range. In contrast, GA has been reported to effectively promote seed germination and transcriptomic responses in Lomatogonium rotatum [39], whereas in our study GA promoted germination but was weaker than BR. These comparisons suggest that the most effective hormone treatment differs among plant species and may depend on seed dormancy type, physiological status, and treatment concentration.
The weaker effects of 6-BA and IAA in the present study may also reflect species- and stage-dependent hormonal sensitivity. Previous studies have shown that auxin and cytokinin treatments can affect seed germination in kaffir lime, while hormone interactions involving ABA, GA, and auxin have been reported in Arabidopsis seed germination [40].
By contrast, the inhibitory effect of ABA in our study is consistent with its established role in dormancy maintenance and germination suppression, as also reported in studies of seed and bud dormancy regulation [41]. Overall, these comparisons indicate that BR was the most effective stimulant under our experimental conditions, but this pattern should not be generalized to all species. Future studies should further compare single and combined hormone treatments across developmental stages and seed batches of Z. schneideriana.

4.2. Regulatory Effects of Exogenous BR10 on the Antioxidant Defense System

GO enrichment analysis showed that the BR-responsive differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were predominantly associated with functional terms related to hydrogen peroxide metabolism, hydrogen peroxide catabolism, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism. Previous research has indicated that a temporary increase in ROS levels commonly occurs during the early phase of seed germination [42], where moderate ROS levels act as signaling molecules to promote radicle protrusion, cell elongation, and cell wall loosening, whereas excessive ROS accumulation may lead to membrane lipid peroxidation and reduced cellular viability [43]. This framework provides a plausible explanation for the phenomenon observed in this study, namely that BR promoted seed germination within an optimal concentration range but exhibited a threshold effect at higher concentrations. Similar dose-dependent effects of BR have also been reported in previous studies [44]. When BR treatment enhances metabolic activity and signaling processes, the balance between ROS production and scavenging may become a critical limiting factor determining germination performance.
At the mechanistic level, accumulating evidence suggests that BRs participate in the maintenance of ROS homeostasis by regulating the expression of antioxidant-related genes or modulating enzymatic pathways such as peroxidases and the ascorbate–glutathione cycle [45,46]. Consistent with this notion, DEGs identified in this study were significantly enriched in molecular function categories including peroxidase activity and oxidoreductase activity. In addition, representative DEGs annotated as peroxidase-, oxidoreductase-, glutathione-related, and ROS metabolism-related genes were identified from the DEG dataset, providing more specific candidate genes that may be involved in BR10-responsive redox adjustment. These transcriptomic patterns were consistent with the antioxidant enzyme assays, in which BR10 significantly increased POD activity while decreasing SOD, CAT, APX, and GR activities in bud tissues. This result further supports the involvement of redox regulation in BR-mediated germination responses, although these measurements more likely reflect sustained redox adjustment during early seedling establishment rather than immediate redox events at radicle protrusion. [47]. These physiological results suggest that BR10 did not simply enhance the overall antioxidant capacity, but rather selectively reshaped the antioxidant defense system. In particular, the marked increase in POD activity, together with the enrichment of peroxidase-related functions, indicates that BR10 may preferentially regulate specific enzymatic branches involved in redox adjustment. Because these measurements were obtained at a relatively late post-germination stage, they likely reflect sustained redox reprogramming during early seedling establishment rather than the transient oxidative burst that occurs immediately during germination.
It has also been reported that the ROS regulatory threshold varies among species and among seeds with different physiological states [48], leading to either promotive or inhibitory effects of the same hormone depending on its concentration. Therefore, the reduced or even inhibitory effects observed under high BR concentrations in this study may be attributed not only to excessive hormonal stimulation itself but also to disruption of ROS dynamic equilibrium. Similar concentration-dependent responses have been reported in studies concerning hormone-mediated redox regulation [49]. In this sense, the promotive effect of BR on Z. schneideriana germination may depend on its ability to maintain an appropriate balance between ROS generation and detoxification during the transition from dormancy to active growth. The present antioxidant enzyme data further support this view, suggesting that the beneficial effect of BR10 is associated with selective modulation of the antioxidant network rather than a uniform increase in all enzyme activities.
In addition, the enrichment of GO terms related to chlorophyll binding and tetrapyrrole binding in the present study suggests that BR treatment may influence metabolic preparation for the transition from heterotrophic to autotrophic growth during the later stages of germination. Previous studies have shown that chlorophyll- and tetrapyrrole-related processes are closely associated with early seedling establishment and photosynthetic development [50]. Although sampling in this study was restricted to germinated individuals with relatively short hypocotyls, the possibility that BR accelerates the activation of metabolic processes associated with the germination–seedling establishment transition cannot be excluded. Future studies integrating ROS-specific staining, temporal sampling at multiple germination stages, and quantitative PCR validation of key genes will help to further clarify the causal relationship between BR-regulated ROS homeostasis and its germination-promoting effects.

4.3. Exogenous BR Promotes Seed Germination by Reshaping Endogenous Hormone-Related Balance

KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the BR-responsive differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were significantly enriched in pathways related to plant hormone signal transduction and the plant MAPK signaling pathway. These results suggest that BR-promoted germination in Zelkova schneideriana is associated with extensive hormonal crosstalk rather than a single linear regulatory route, which is consistent with previous evidence that BR signaling interacts with multiple hormone-related pathways [51]. The endogenous hormone-related metabolite measurements further support this interpretation. At 40 days after germination, BR10 treatment caused a dramatic accumulation of BL, whereas ABA content remained unchanged, and the levels of ACC, GA3, GA4, IAA, JA, and SA were all significantly reduced. Because ACC is the direct precursor of ethylene rather than a hormone itself, these compounds are collectively referred to here as hormones, hormone precursors, and signaling-related metabolites. These results indicate that BR10 markedly reshaped the endogenous hormone-related profile in bud tissues and that its promotive effect was accompanied by coordinated reprogramming of multiple hormone-related pathways.
Among these changes, the strong increase in BL provides direct physiological evidence that exogenous BR10 altered endogenous BR homeostasis. Previous studies have also shown that exogenous BR application can affect endogenous BR-related status and downstream signaling responses [52]. BRs are known to regulate seed germination and early seedling development not only through their own signaling pathway, but also through extensive interactions with other hormonal networks. Therefore, the pronounced BL accumulation observed in this study is broadly consistent with the transcriptomic enrichment of hormone-related pathways and suggests that BR10 may reinforce BR-dependent regulatory processes during the transition from germination to early seedling establishment. By contrast, ABA content did not differ significantly between the CK and BR10 treatments, implying that the promotive effect of BR10 in Z. schneideriana may not primarily depend on reducing ABA abundance at this sampling stage. Instead, BR-mediated promotion may involve changes in hormone sensitivity, signaling efficiency, or crosstalk with other pathways, rather than a simple decrease in ABA level alone. This interpretation is consistent with previous reports that BR and ABA may interact at the signaling level during seed germination and stress responses [53].
The decreases in ACC, JA, and SA under BR10 are also noteworthy. Previous studies have shown that ethylene-, jasmonate-, and salicylate-related signals are closely associated with stress responses and developmental regulation in plants [54]. ACC is the direct precursor of ethylene, whereas JA and SA are commonly associated with stress- and defense-related signaling. Their reduced levels suggest that BR10 may shift post-germination tissues toward a physiological state less dominated by stress-related hormonal signals and more favorable for coordinated growth establishment. At the same time, the significant decreases in GA3, GA4, and IAA indicate that the hormone profile under BR10 was not characterized by a uniform increase in all growth-promoting hormones. Because these measurements were performed at 40 days after germination rather than at the onset of radicle protrusion, the lower GA and IAA contents should be interpreted cautiously. They may reflect feedback regulation, altered hormone turnover, or developmental-stage differences associated with accelerated germination and subsequent seedling establishment under BR10, rather than a reduced importance of these hormones per se. Similar feedback interactions among BR, GA, and auxin pathways have been reported in other plant systems [55].
Taken together, the combined transcriptomic and hormonal evidence suggests that the promotive effect of BR10 on Z. schneideriana is closely associated with multi-hormone coordination. Rather than acting through a single pathway, BR10 appears to reshape endogenous BR status while simultaneously modifying the balance among ethylene-related, auxin-related, gibberellin-related, and stress-associated hormonal signals. This integrative regulatory pattern is consistent with current views that seed germination and early seedling growth are governed by dynamic hormonal networks. Nevertheless, because hormone measurements in this study were obtained from bud tissues at a relatively late post-germination stage, they more likely reflect the sustained physiological consequences of BR10 treatment during seedling establishment than the immediate hormonal triggers of germination initiation. Future studies integrating time-course hormone profiling, validation of hormone-related genes, and signaling analyses will help to further clarify how BR interacts with other endogenous hormones to regulate germination and early seedling development in Z. schneideriana [56].

4.4. Coordinated Regulation of Energy Metabolism and Signal Transduction Pathways by Exogenous BR

KEGG pathway analysis showed that the identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were mainly associated with energy and substance metabolism, including glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, and amino acid metabolism, as well as plant hormone signal transduction and the plant MAPK signaling pathway. Previous studies have shown that these metabolic pathways are closely related to seed reserve mobilization and germination performance [57]. Seed germination requires the coordinated mobilization of stored reserves, activation of multiple metabolic routes, and sufficient energy supply to support radicle emergence and early growth [58,59]. Classical studies in seed physiology have demonstrated that the efficiency of starch and soluble sugar conversion [60], as well as the intensity of respiratory metabolism, are closely associated with germination speed and vigor. Accordingly, the promotive effects of BR on germination rate and early seedling growth observed at the phenotypic level in this study are consistent with the enrichment of carbohydrate and energy metabolism pathways at the transcriptomic level, suggesting that BR may facilitate radicle elongation by enhancing energy supply and metabolite transport efficiency.
Consistent with our findings, previous studies in various plant systems have reported that BR participates in the regulation of genes associated with cell elongation and development, often in coordination with sugar metabolism and cell wall remodeling processes [61]. This agrees with the enrichment of pathways related to carbohydrate, lipid, and amino acid metabolism observed in the present KEGG analysis. These findings suggest that BR-mediated promotion of germination is unlikely to rely on a single regulatory step, but rather on an integrated metabolism–growth regulatory network, as also proposed in previous studies [62,63]. It should be noted that metabolic reprogramming during germination exhibits species-specific characteristics, and woody plant seeds often display more complex dormancy release and reserve utilization strategies than herbaceous model species [64]. Consequently, the optimal concentration and effective time window of BR may differ between woody and herbaceous plants.
At the signaling level, enrichment of the plant hormone signal transduction and MAPK signaling pathway categories suggests that BR treatment may coordinate metabolic and developmental processes through integrated signaling networks. Similar roles of hormone and MAPK signaling pathways in coordinating plant growth and stress-related responses have been reported previously [65]. Extensive evidence indicates that BR signaling interacts with other phytohormone pathways, such as abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA), through synergistic or antagonistic effects, and modulates downstream transcriptional regulation via key phosphorylation events [66]. Meanwhile, MAPK cascades are recognized as central hubs linking hormonal signals, stress responses, and growth regulation, playing crucial roles in modulating gene expression and metabolic status during seed germination and seedling establishment [67]. In the present study, endogenous hormone measurements further showed that BR10 markedly reshaped the hormone profile in bud tissues, whereas antioxidant enzyme assays indicated selective modulation of the antioxidant defense system. Combined with the enrichment of energy metabolism-related and signaling-related pathways, these results imply that BR may not only directly promote growth, but also coordinate the balance among redox adjustment, metabolic preparation, and hormone-mediated developmental regulation.
Taken together, the transcriptomic results suggest that BR-promoted germination in Z. schneideriana may involve coordinated regulation of redox homeostasis, reserve mobilization, primary and secondary metabolism, and multiple signaling pathways. The integrated physiological and hormonal data further support this interpretation by showing that BR10 treatment was associated with selective changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and substantial reshaping of endogenous hormone status. Based on these results, we propose that BR10 may promote seed germination and early seedling establishment mainly through three interconnected processes: regulation of ROS-related redox balance, activation of energy and substance metabolism, and coordination of hormone- and MAPK-related signaling pathways [68].
However, another possible interpretation is that BR10 may accelerate the developmental progression of germinating seeds rather than inducing entirely BR-specific transcriptional changes. In this scenario, the transcriptomic profile of BR10-treated seeds may partly resemble that of untreated seeds at a later germination stage, because the treated seeds reach this developmental state earlier. Previous time-course transcriptomic studies during seed germination have shown that gene expression patterns change dynamically across germination stages, especially for genes involved in reserve mobilization, energy metabolism, cell wall remodeling, hormone signaling, and stress or redox regulation [22,23,24]. A recent study on Z. schneideriana also indicated that seed germination and seedling establishment are accompanied by coordinated metabolic and transcriptional changes [5]. Therefore, the transcriptional differences observed between CK and BR10 in the present study may reflect both BR-related regulatory effects and differences in developmental progression caused by accelerated germination.
It should also be noted that the present study provides preliminary mechanistic clues rather than a complete molecular mechanism for BR-mediated germination regulation. Transcriptome enrichment analysis mainly indicates potentially involved pathways, whereas the key regulatory genes, upstream signaling components, and causal relationships remain to be further confirmed. In addition, the RNA-seq results were not validated by independent methods such as RT-PCR or qRT-PCR in the present study. In particular, key genes involved in the BR signaling pathway, such as BRI1 and BZR1, should be prioritized for future validation because they may play important roles in BR perception and downstream transcriptional regulation. Future studies should combine qRT-PCR validation, time-course or stage-matched sampling, and functional characterization of candidate genes to clarify whether BR mainly accelerates the normal germination program or activates specific regulatory pathways in Z. schneideriana [69,70].
Although antioxidant enzyme activities and related gene expression patterns were compared between CK and BR10 at the end of the 40-day incubation period, these data should be interpreted with caution. Seed germination of Z. schneideriana was asynchronous, and the molecular and biochemical samples were collected from germinated seedlings rather than from seeds precisely at the onset of radicle protrusion. Therefore, the enzyme activity and transcriptomic results are more likely to reflect the physiological status of early seedling establishment after germination, rather than the immediate redox events that trigger radicle emergence. To reduce developmental heterogeneity, only normally germinated seedlings with comparable early morphology were used for sampling. Nevertheless, future studies should include stage-matched sampling at defined germination phases, such as imbibition, pre-radicle protrusion, radicle protrusion, and early seedling establishment, to more precisely distinguish BR-induced germination initiation from post-germination developmental effects.

4.5. Practical Implications for Seed Propagation and Conservation of Z. schneideriana

From an applied perspective, the present findings suggest that BR treatment, particularly at 10 mg·L−1, has potential value as a practical seed pretreatment strategy for improving the germination performance of Z. schneideriana [71]. Compared with more complex dormancy-breaking or seed enhancement methods, exogenous hormone soaking is relatively simple to operate and can be more easily incorporated into routine nursery practices. For a rare woody species with low germination efficiency, such an approach may contribute to improving seedling production, facilitating germplasm conservation, and supporting restoration-oriented propagation programs [72].
The practical significance of this result is particularly noteworthy because Z. schneideriana is not only an ecologically important native tree species but also a valuable timber resource with potential applications in high-quality wood production, ornamental planting, and ecological restoration. Therefore, improving seed germination efficiency is directly relevant to nursery propagation and the sustainable utilization of this species. In this context, BR pretreatment may serve as a feasible technical option for improving the availability of seedlings needed for conservation planting and artificial propagation.
In addition, the operational feasibility of BR application is relatively favorable because the treatment used in this study involved only short-term seed soaking and did not require specialized equipment. This makes the method potentially adaptable to routine nursery operations or small-scale propagation programs. However, before large-scale application in nursery production or conservation practice, further studies are still needed to evaluate treatment cost, dosage optimization, seed batch stability, and consistency under different environmental conditions. It will also be important to determine whether the promotive effect of BR remains stable across seed lots with different physiological quality or dormancy status.
Although BR10 showed the strongest promotive effect on seed germination in the present study, seedling growth traits such as plant height, leaf size, root length, and root number were not quantitatively measured. Therefore, the present results mainly demonstrate the effect of BR10 on germination performance and related physiological and transcriptomic responses, rather than providing a complete evaluation of post-germination seedling growth. Future studies should include quantitative measurements of seedling morphological traits to determine whether BR treatment also promotes subsequent seedling growth and root development in Z. schneideriana.
Overall, BR10 treatment may serve as a useful candidate seed pretreatment for Z. schneideriana, but its practical application still requires nursery-scale validation, dosage optimization, and evaluation across seed batches with different physiological quality.

5. Conclusions

In this study, Z. schneideriana seeds were used as experimental materials to systematically evaluate the effects of different exogenous phytohormones on seed germination and to explore the possible molecular basis underlying BR-mediated promotion of germination through transcriptome sequencing. The results demonstrated that exogenous phytohormones exerted significantly different regulatory effects on Z. schneideriana seed germination. Among them, BR treatment at an appropriate concentration showed the most pronounced promotive effects on germination rate, germination potential, and germination index, whereas high BR concentrations exhibited inhibitory effects, indicating a typical concentration-dependent response.
Transcriptomic profiling demonstrated that BR treatment induced substantial changes in gene expression during seed germination, as reflected by pronounced differences in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the treated and control groups, together with strong consistency among biological replicates. Functional enrichment analyses based on GO and KEGG further showed that these DEGs were primarily associated with processes related to reactive oxygen species metabolism and redox regulation, energy and substance metabolism, as well as plant hormone signaling and MAPK-mediated pathways.
Antioxidant enzyme assays further showed that BR10 treatment significantly increased POD activity while decreasing SOD, CAT, APX, and GR activities, indicating that BR10 selectively reshaped the antioxidant defense system rather than uniformly enhancing all antioxidant enzyme activities. In addition, endogenous hormone-related metabolite measurements revealed that BR10 treatment caused a dramatic accumulation of BL, while significantly reducing the levels of ACC, GA3, GA4, IAA, JA, and SA, with no significant change in ABA. These findings indicate that BR-promoted germination and early seedling establishment in Z. schneideriana are accompanied by substantial reprogramming of antioxidant regulation and endogenous hormone status.
By integrating phenotypic performance with transcriptomic, physiological, and hormonal evidence, the results suggest that exogenous BR facilitates seed germination and early seedling development of Z. schneideriana through the regulation of redox balance, promotion of reserve mobilization and energy availability, and coordination of multiple signaling networks. Although the present study does not fully resolve the complete molecular mechanism of BR-mediated germination regulation, it provides preliminary evidence that BR-promoted seed germination in Z. schneideriana is associated with redox regulation, metabolic activation, and hormone-related signaling networks. These findings offer a theoretical framework for improving hormone-based strategies in seed propagation and seedling cultivation of Z. schneideriana and highlight the need for future investigations focusing on key regulatory genes and their functional validation.

6. Patents

The research reported in this manuscript has resulted in a related Chinese invention patent. The patent, entitled “A Method for Improving Seed Germination Rate of Zelkova schneideriana”, has been filed with the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). The patent application has been officially accepted and published. The applicant institutions include Hunan Academy of Forestry and Central South University of Forestry and Technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z., J.L. (Jianbing Liu) and J.Y.; methodology, X.Z.; software, X.Z.; validation, X.Z., J.L. (Jianan Li) and X.R.; formal analysis, X.Z.; investigation, X.Z., D.L. and X.L.; resources, J.L. (Jianbing Liu) and J.Y.; data curation, X.Z. and R.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.L. (Jianbing Liu) and J.Y.; visualization, X.Z.; supervision, J.L. (Jianbing Liu) and J.Y.; project administration, J.L. (Jianbing Liu); funding acquisition, J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hunan Provincial Forestry Science and Technology Innovation Program (XLK202408), the Yuelushan Laboratory Breeding Project (YLS-2025-ZY04068), the Central Government Forestry and Grassland Science and Technology Promotion and Demonstration Fund Project ([2026] XT202), and Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2023JJ41041). The APC was funded by the Hunan Provincial Forestry Science and Technology Research and Innovation Fund.

Data Availability Statement

The raw RNA-seq data generated in this study have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject ID PRJNA1447982. The corresponding BioSample accessions are SAMN57097151–SAMN57097156. The remaining SRA accession information will be added once the submission has been fully processed.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all those who provided support during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were reported by the authors. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
6-BA6-Benzylaminopurine
GA3Gibberellic acid (GA3)
IAAIndole-3-acetic acid
BRBrassinosteroids
ABAAbscisic acid
CKWater-treated control
MAPKMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
Z. schneiderianaZelkova schneideriana
PPLPercentage of Polymorphic Loci
PCAPrincipal Component Analysis
PCCPearson Correlation Coefficient
BUSCOBenchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs
NOGNon-supervised Orthologous Groups
GOGene Ontology
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
TPMTranscripts Per Million
FDRFalse Discovery Rate
DEGsDifferentially Expressed Genes

References

  1. He, J.; Jin, X.; Wu, X.; Zhang, W.; Huang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yu, Q.; Yan, W.; Wang, J.; et al. Environmental drivers and conservation implications of endangered ancient Zelkova schneideriana trees in Hunan, China. Biodivers. Conserv. 2024, 33, 3663–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Sheng, Q.; Zhu, Z. Impacts of Climate Change on the Biogeography and Ecological Structure of Zelkova schneideriana Hand.-Mazz. in China. Plants 2024, 13, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, C.; Ren, X.-L.; Xin, G.-L.; Lei, Z.; Du, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, W.-Z. The complete chloroplast genome of Zelkova schneideriana (Rosales: Ulmaceae), an Endangered species endemic to China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B-Resour. 2018, 3, 734–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, H.; Lyu, L.; Xiao, Z.; Yang, T.; Jiang, M.; Wei, X. Regeneration of an endangered plant species endemic to the remote mountain areas: Anthropogenic disturbance matters. For. Ecol. Manag. 2025, 576, 122406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yan, F.; Wei, T.; Yang, C.; Yang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Jiang, Y. Combined Analysis of Untargeted Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Revealed Seed Germination and Seedling Establishment in Zelkova schneideriana. Genes 2024, 15, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Burrows, C.J. Germination behaviour of the seeds of six New Zealand woody plant species. N. Z. J. Bot. 1995, 33, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  7. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Yoshinaga, A.; Wolkis, D. Physiological dormancy in seeds of tropical montane woody species in Hawai`i. Plant Species Biol. 2021, 36, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Logan, S.R.; Edwards, M.B.; Shiver, B.D. Survival and Growth of Seed Trees 20 Years after a Natural Regeneration Cut in the Piedmont of Georgia. South. J. Appl. For. 2005, 29, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lv, Y.; Pan, J.; Wang, H.; Reiter, R.J.; Li, X.; Mou, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yao, Z.; Zhao, D.; Yu, D. Melatonin inhibits seed germination by crosstalk with abscisic acid, gibberellin, and auxin in Arabidopsis. J. Pineal Res. 2021, 70, e12736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pramesthi, A.M.; Az-Zahra, S.; Tamidiyono, M.B.W.Y.; Salamah, U.; Mafiroh, W.U.; Tunjung, W.A.S. In vitro seed germination and phytochemical content of kaffir lime (Citrus hystrix DC.) in response to auxin and cytokinin treatments. Scienceasia 2025, 51, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dong, Y.; Khalil-Ur-Rehman, M.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, L.; Li, H.; Yang, L.; Zheng, H.; Tao, J. EARLY BUD BREAK and SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE 4 integrate abscisic acid (ABA) plant hormone signaling control of grape bud dormancy. J. Integr. Agric. 2025, 24, 4613–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nikolić, B.; Jovanović, V.; Knežević, B.; Nikolić, Z.; Babović-Đorđević, M. Mode of Action of Brassinosteroids: Seed Germination and Seedling Growth and Development—One Hypothesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Z.; Luo, X.; Wang, L.; Shu, K. ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 5 mediates light–ABA/gibberellin crosstalk networks during seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 4674–4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, C.; Miao, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, A. Brassinosteroid-signaling kinase ZmBSK7 enhances salt stress tolerance in maize. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2024, 723, 150222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Chen, G.; Xu, H.; Jing, S.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, F.; Hu, X.; Zhu, Y. Transcriptome Analysis of Rice Embryo and Endosperm during Seed Germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mohamed, I.A.A.; Shalby, N.; El-Badri, A.M.; Batool, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z.; Salah, A.; Rady, M.M.; Jie, K.; Wang, B.; et al. RNA-seq analysis revealed key genes associated with salt tolerance in rapeseed germination through carbohydrate metabolism, hormone, and MAPK signaling pathways. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 176, 114262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tondepu, S.A.G.; Manova, V.; Vadivel, D.; Dondi, D.; Pagano, A.; Macovei, A. MicroRNAs potentially targeting DDR-related genes are differentially expressed upon exposure to γ-rays during seed germination in wheat. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 212, 108771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sarmiento-Gomez, E.J.; Lujan-Hidalgo, M.C.; Porraz-Ruiz, M.L.; Gutierrez-Miceli, F.A.; Santiz-Gomez, J.A. Seed germination and in vitro propagation of pitahaya (Hylocereus undatus). Biotecnia 2025, 27, e2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. GB/T 2772-1999; Rules for Forest Tree Seed Testing. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 1999.
  20. Ma, Y.; Xia, L.; Liu, W.D. Effects of GA3, 6-BA, and Mn2+ on Seed Germination of Catalpa bungei. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2012, 28, 40–46. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pawar, Y.; Varma, L.R.; More, S.G. Effect of GA3 and Time of Seed Soaking on Germination and Seedling Vigour of Sandalwood. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2024, 46, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deng, R.; Lv, P.; Wang, C.; Tian, X.Y.; Xue, Y.; Wang, X.Q.; Cao, Y. Effects of Seed Soaking with Different Concentrations of GA3 and IAA on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Lespedeza juncea. Guizhou Agric. Sci. 2025, 53, 105–112. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, Y.L.; Wang, B.; Xia, F.S.; Zhang, J.M.; Zhang, J.C.; Li, J.J. Effects of Exogenous Brassinolide Priming on Germination Characteristics of Aged Oat Seeds. Anim. Husb. Feed Sci. 2023, 44, 94–100. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.Q.; Li, C.B.X.; Zhang, Q.; Du, J.; Meng, A.J. Effects of ABA Seed Soaking on Seed Germination and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Waxy Maize Under Low-Temperature Conditions. Sci. Technol. Tianjin Agric. For. 2025, 6, 1–5. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tkalec, M.; Mirković, T.; Mitrović, M.; Parađiković, N.; Kraljičak, J.; Zeljković, S.; Vinkovi, T. Seed Germination of Some Flower Species Under Influence of Different Light Conditions. Agroznanje 2017, 17, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  26. Montechiarini, N.H.; Morandi, E.N.; Gosparini, C.O. Developing soybean seed germination: Low ABA and high EXP1 gene expression promote embryonic axis growth whereas the seed coat delays radicle protrusion. Seed Sci. Res. 2022, 32, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cipriani, V.B.; Calvi, G.P.; Kossmann Ferraz, I.D. Thermal optima for seed germination of 30 tree species from Central Amazonia: A comparison of approaches and a new proposal. Seed Sci. Technol. 2023, 51, 435–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kavian, S.; Safarzadeh, S.; Yasrebi, J. Zinc improves growth and antioxidant enzyme activity in Aloe vera plant under salt stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 147, 1221–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moradian, F.; Modarresi, M.; Nematzadeh, G.A. The Study of Superoxide Dismutase Activity in Salt Stress and Identification of It’s Gene from Aeluropus littoralis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agriculture, Environment and Biological Sciences (ICFAE-14), Antalya, Turkey, 4–5 June 2014; pp. 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  30. Guérard, F.; Bont, L.d.; Gakière, B.; Tcherkez, G. Evaluation and application of a targeted SPE-LC-MS method for quantifying plant hormones and phenolics in Arabidopsis. Funct. Plant Biol. 2017, 44, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhu, Z.T.; Lei, M.K.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Huang, C.Q.; Ye, Y.B.; Chen, Y.J.; Han, C. Determination of Aluminum Fosetyl Residues in Plant-Derived Products by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2024, 45, 235–241. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, D.; Zhu, Q.; Li, Z.; Chai, Y.; Chen, H. Determination of methyl bromide residues in tea by headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Beverage Plant Res. 2023, 3, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, G.W.; Zeng, T.Q.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Chen, G.L.; Liu, H.H. Improved Trizol Method for Total RNA Extraction from Camellia oleifera Leaves and Comparison. Mol. Plant Breed. 2018, 16, 5920–5926. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pease, J.; Sooknanan, R. A rapid, directional RNA-seq library preparation workflow for Illumina® sequencing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, i–ii. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, Q.; Chen, W.; Luo, M.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, Z. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals regulatory network and regulators associated with proanthocyanidin accumulation in persimmon. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gong, D.; He, F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Tian, S.; Sun, C.; Zhang, X. Understanding of Hormonal Regulation in Rice Seed Germination. Life 2022, 12, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chakma, S.P.; Chileshe, S.M.; Thomas, R.; Krishna, P. Cotton Seed Priming with Brassinosteroid Promotes Germination and Seedling Growth. Agronomy 2021, 11, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cukor, J.; Rasakova, N.a.M.; Linda, R.; Linhart, L.; Gutsch, M.R.; Kunes, I. Effects of Brassinosteroid Application on Seed Germination of Scots Pine under Standard and Heat Stress Conditions. Balt. For. 2018, 24, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hu, C.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Ren, C.; Huang, L. Fumarylacetoacetate Hydrolase Regulates Seed Dormancy and Germination Through the Gibberellin Pathway in Arabidopsis. Plants 2025, 14, 3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Du, J.Q. Effects of IAA and ABA on Oat Seed Germination and Seedling Growth. Seed 2021, 40, 106–109. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sano, N.; Marion-Poll, A. Aba metabolism and homeostasis in seed dormancy and germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bykova, N.V.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Redox Control of Seed Germination is Mediated by the Crosstalk of Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2025, 42, 442–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li Pomi, F.; Gammeri, L.; Borgia, F.; Di Gioacchino, M.; Gangemi, S. Oxidative Stress and Skin Diseases: The Role of Lipid Peroxidation. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhao, P.; Li, G.; Duan, R.; Li, C.; Fu, H. Concentration-Dependent Effects of Polyethylene Microplastics on Cadmium and Lead Bioavailability in Soil. Toxics 2025, 13, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lee, J.; Cho, Y.S.; Jung, H.; Choi, I. Pharmacological regulation of oxidative stress in stem cells. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 4081890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Moghaddam, M.; Farhadi, N.; Panjtandoust, M.; Ghanati, F. Seed germination, antioxidant enzymes activity and proline content in medicinal plant Tagetes minuta under salinity stress. Plant Biosyst. 2020, 154, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. da Fonseca-Pereira, P.; Pham, P.A.; Cavalcanti, J.H.F.; Omena-Garcia, R.P.; Barros, J.A.S.; Rosado-Souza, L.; Vallarino, J.G.; Mutwil, M.; Avin-Wittenberg, T.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; et al. The Arabidopsis electron-transfer flavoprotein:ubiquinone oxidoreductase is required during normal seed development and germination. Plant J. 2022, 109, 196–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Jhanji, S.; Goyal, E.; Chumber, M.; Kaur, G. Exploring fine tuning between phytohormones and ROS signaling cascade in regulation of seed dormancy, germination and seedling development. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 207, 108352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kretynin, S.V.; Kolesnikov, Y.S. The Role of Calcium in Implementation of the Effect of Brassinosteroids during the Induction of Oxidative Stress in Tobacco. Cytol. Genet. 2023, 57, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rubio, S.; Larson, T.R.; Gonzalez-Guzman, M.; Alejandro, S.; Graham, I.A.; Serrano, R.; Rodriguez, P.L. Expression of Concern: An Arabidopsis Mutant Impaired in Coenzyme A Biosynthesis Is Sugar Dependent for Seedling Establishment. Plant Physiol. 2025, 198, 830–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, J.; Yin, Y. WRKY transcription factors are involved in brassinosteroid signaling and mediate the crosstalk between plant growth and drought tolerance. Plant Signal. Behav. 2017, 12, e1365212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Huang, J.; Feng, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Y. Overexpression of a BR inactivating enzyme gene GhPAG1 impacts eggplant fruit development and anthocyanin accumulation mainly by altering hormone homeostasis. Plant Sci. 2024, 341, 112014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fan, Z.; Xie, Y.; Teng, K.; Li, M.; Cao, X.; Ma, S.; Zhang, M.; Meng, S.; Liu, B.; Ullah, N.; et al. OsARF9 integrates auxin-BR-ABA signaling to regulate plant architecture and seed germination in rice. Crop J. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gan, H.; Wang, S.; Yang, Z.; Ma, P. Molecular Decoding of Phytohormone Crosstalk: JA-Mediated Key Regulatory Nodes and Signal Integration. Plants 2025, 14, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, S.; Si, Q.; Yang, K.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, L.; Okita, T.W.; Yan, Y.; Tian, L. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Effects of Exogenous Gibberellin on the Germination of Solanum torvum Seeds. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ermis, S.; Amirkhani, M.; Loos, M.T.; Taylor, A.G. Investigations into Selected Pollinator-Friendly Plant Species: Seed Lot Germination, Breaking Dormancy with Plant Hormone Priming and the Influence of Water Stress on Germination. Horticulturae 2025, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sha, H.; Yu, Y.; Han, Y.; Liu, J.; Han, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Huo, C.; Chang, H.; Zhang, F.; Wang, J.; et al. Combination of maleic hydrazide and coumarin inhibits rice seed germination involving reactive oxygen species accumulation, ABA metabolism and starch degradation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 217, 109202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, J.; Li, Z.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Nangia, V.; Liu, Y. Arginine promotes seed energy metabolism, increasing wheat seed germination at low temperature. Crop J. 2024, 12, 1185–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hu, S.; Qin, Q.; Liu, J.; Yin, H.; Meng, Q.; Yu, J.; Huang, S.; Ma, Z. The Correlations of Barley Vitality and Storage Reserve Mobilization during Early Germination. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2023, 81, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, J.; Li, W.; Sun, S.; Peng, L.; Huang, Z.; He, Y.; Wang, Z. The rice small auxin-up rna gene ossaur33 regulates seed vigor via sugar pathway during early seed germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Conway, S.J.; Walcher-Chevillet, C.L.; Barbour, K.S.; Kramer, E.M. Brassinosteroids regulate petal spur length in Aquilegia by controlling cell elongation. Ann. Bot. 2021, 128, 931–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mitchell, J.; Mukhtar, N.K.; Bassel, G.W. Low temperature stimulates spatial molecular reprogramming of the Arabidopsis seed germination programme. Seed Sci. Res. 2020, 30, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Huber, K.; Mestres-Arenas, A.; Fajas, L.; Leal-Esteban, L.C. The multifaceted role of cell cycle regulators in the coordination of growth and metabolism. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 3813–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, J.-Z.; Huang, X.-L.; Xiao, X.-F.; Liu, J.-M.; Liao, X.-F.; Sun, Q.-W.; Peng, L.; Zhang, L. Seed Dormancy Release and Germination Requirements of Cinnamomum migao, an Endangered and Rare Woody Plant in Southwest China. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 770940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, W.; Garg, V.; Varshney, R.K.; Liu, H. Single cell RNA-seq in phytohormone signaling: A promising future. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 1208–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Ma, C.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Li, M.; Yan, M. Crosstalk Between Abscisic Acid (ABA) and Brassinosteroid (BR) Signaling Pathways Is Revealed by Competing Endogenous RNA (ceRNA) Network in Brassica napus. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2025, 43, 1958–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Song, J.; Shang, L.; Wang, X.; Xing, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Ye, Z. MAPK11 regulates seed germination and ABA signaling in tomato by phosphorylating SnRKs. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 1677–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, S.Y.; Habili, N.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Paull, J.G. Quantitative Analysis of Pathway Enrichment within Faba Bean Seeds RNA-Seq (Vicia faba L). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 2305–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chi, J.; Liu, S.; Xiang, S.; Zhan, R.; He, R. Selection and validation of internal reference genes for qRT-PCR in different tissues of Calathea spinulosa. J. Trop. Crops 2025, 46, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baccelli, I.; Benny, J.; Caruso, T.; Martinelli, F. The priming fingerprint on the plant transcriptome investigated through meta-analysis of RNA-Seq data. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 156, 779–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zeng, H.; Liu, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Wu, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, H.; Shen, Q.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y. Seed-Soaking with Melatonin for the Improvement of Seed Germination, Seedling Growth, and the Antioxidant Defense System under Flooding Stress. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gladfelter, H.J.; Merkle, S.A. Somatic Embryogenesis and Organogenesis of Rare Woody Species in Georgia, Stewartia and Franklinia. In Proceedings of the 2014 ASHS Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 28–31 July 2014; p. S360. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effects of different exogenous plant hormone treatments on the germination rate of Zelkova schneideriana seeds. (a) Effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA; 20, 40, and 80 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (b) effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of brassinolide (BR; 10, 20, and 30 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (c) effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of gibberellic acid (GA3; 125, 250, and 500 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (d) effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA; 100, 200, and 300 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (e) effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of abscisic acid (ABA; 50, 100, and 150 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (f) representative images of seed germination performance under different hormone treatments. From left to right: water (CK), BR10, IAA300, ABA150, and GA500. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments at the same incubation time (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effects of different exogenous plant hormone treatments on the germination rate of Zelkova schneideriana seeds. (a) Effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA; 20, 40, and 80 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (b) effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of brassinolide (BR; 10, 20, and 30 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (c) effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of gibberellic acid (GA3; 125, 250, and 500 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (d) effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA; 100, 200, and 300 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (e) effects of distilled water (CK) and different concentrations of abscisic acid (ABA; 50, 100, and 150 mg·L−1) on seed germination rate; (f) representative images of seed germination performance under different hormone treatments. From left to right: water (CK), BR10, IAA300, ABA150, and GA500. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments at the same incubation time (p < 0.05).
Forests 17 00616 g001
Figure 2. Length distribution of assembled transcripts in Zelkova schneideriana. The x-axis represents transcript length intervals and the y-axis represents the number of transcripts within each interval.
Figure 2. Length distribution of assembled transcripts in Zelkova schneideriana. The x-axis represents transcript length intervals and the y-axis represents the number of transcripts within each interval.
Forests 17 00616 g002
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation analysis of transcriptome samples. (a) PCA plot of CK and BR10 samples based on normalized transcript expression data. Each point represents one biological replicate. (b) Pearson correlation heatmap of transcriptome samples. The color scale indicates the correlation coefficient between samples.
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation analysis of transcriptome samples. (a) PCA plot of CK and BR10 samples based on normalized transcript expression data. Each point represents one biological replicate. (b) Pearson correlation heatmap of transcriptome samples. The color scale indicates the correlation coefficient between samples.
Forests 17 00616 g003
Figure 4. Gene Ontology (GO) classification of annotated unigenes in Zelkova schneideriana. Annotated unigenes were assigned to three major GO categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. The x-axis represents the number of unigenes and the y-axis represents GO terms.
Figure 4. Gene Ontology (GO) classification of annotated unigenes in Zelkova schneideriana. Annotated unigenes were assigned to three major GO categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. The x-axis represents the number of unigenes and the y-axis represents GO terms.
Forests 17 00616 g004
Figure 5. eggNOG functional classification of annotated unigenes in Zelkova schneideriana. The x-axis represents eggNOG functional categories and the y-axis represents the number of unigenes assigned to each category.
Figure 5. eggNOG functional classification of annotated unigenes in Zelkova schneideriana. The x-axis represents eggNOG functional categories and the y-axis represents the number of unigenes assigned to each category.
Forests 17 00616 g005
Figure 6. KEGG functional classification of annotated unigenes in Zelkova schneideriana. The x-axis represents the number of unigenes and the y-axis represents KEGG functional categories.
Figure 6. KEGG functional classification of annotated unigenes in Zelkova schneideriana. The x-axis represents the number of unigenes and the y-axis represents KEGG functional categories.
Forests 17 00616 g006
Figure 7. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BR10-treated and CK samples. The x-axis represents log2 fold change (log2FC) and the y-axis represents −log10(p value). Red and blue dots indicate significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively, while gray dots indicate non-significant genes.
Figure 7. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BR10-treated and CK samples. The x-axis represents log2 fold change (log2FC) and the y-axis represents −log10(p value). Red and blue dots indicate significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively, while gray dots indicate non-significant genes.
Forests 17 00616 g007
Figure 8. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BR10-treated and CK samples. Rows represent DEGs and columns represent biological replicates. The heatmap was generated based on normalized expression values, and the color scale indicates relative gene expression levels from low to high.
Figure 8. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BR10-treated and CK samples. Rows represent DEGs and columns represent biological replicates. The heatmap was generated based on normalized expression values, and the color scale indicates relative gene expression levels from low to high.
Forests 17 00616 g008
Figure 9. GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BR10-treated and CK samples. The x-axis represents the rich factor and the y-axis represents enriched GO terms. Dot size indicates the number of DEGs enriched in each GO term, and dot color indicates the adjusted p value.
Figure 9. GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BR10-treated and CK samples. The x-axis represents the rich factor and the y-axis represents enriched GO terms. Dot size indicates the number of DEGs enriched in each GO term, and dot color indicates the adjusted p value.
Forests 17 00616 g009
Figure 10. KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BR10-treated and CK samples. The x-axis represents the rich factor and the y-axis represents enriched KEGG pathways. Dot size indicates the number of DEGs enriched in each pathway, and dot color indicates the adjusted p value.
Figure 10. KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BR10-treated and CK samples. The x-axis represents the rich factor and the y-axis represents enriched KEGG pathways. Dot size indicates the number of DEGs enriched in each pathway, and dot color indicates the adjusted p value.
Forests 17 00616 g010
Table 1. Experimental design.
Table 1. Experimental design.
Hormone TypeWaterBR6-BAGA3IAAABA
Hormone concentration (mg·L−1)-10203020408012525050010020030050100150
Table 2. Summary statistics of transcriptome sequencing data for CK and BR10 samples.
Table 2. Summary statistics of transcriptome sequencing data for CK and BR10 samples.
SampleRaw Bases/GbClean Bases/GbError Rate (%)Q20 (%)Q30 (%)GC Content (%)Mapped Ratio (%)
CK16.586.510.011599.0596.8645.3689.29
CK26.556.490.011699.0496.8245.4589.18
CK36.596.520.011599.0796.9645.489.32
BR10_16.526.450.011599.0896.9845.389.09
BR10_25.965.890.011599.0596.8745.5689.30
BR10_36.015.940.011599.0796.9345.3889.51
(1) Sample, sample name. (2) Raw bases/Gb, total amount of raw sequencing data. (3) Clean bases/Gb, total amount of high-quality data after filtering. (4) Error rate (%), average base-calling error rate of the filtered reads. (5) Q20 (%) and Q30 (%), percentages of bases with Phred quality scores ≥ 20 and ≥30, respectively. (6) GC content (%), percentage of guanine (G) and cytosine (C) bases in the clean reads. (7) Mapped ratio (%), percentage of clean reads successfully mapped to the assembled reference transcripts.
Table 3. Functional annotation summary of assembled unigenes and transcripts in Zelkova schneideriana across six public databases.
Table 3. Functional annotation summary of assembled unigenes and transcripts in Zelkova schneideriana across six public databases.
DatabaseUnigene Number (Percent %)Transcript Number (Percent %)
GO25,959 (48.48)54,065 (56.34)
KEGG12,597 (23.53)26,987 (28.12)
eggNOG24,431 (45.63)50,732 (52.86)
NR29,750 (55.56)61,814 (64.41)
Swiss-Prot22,561 (42.14)46,768 (48.73)
Pfam20,141 (37.62)40,323 (42.02)
Total anno30,137 (56.29)62,374 (64.99)
Total53,541 (100)95,970 (100)
(1) Database, public database used for annotation. (2) Unigene number (%), number and proportion of annotated unigenes in each database. (3) Transcript number (%), number and proportion of annotated transcripts in each database (4) Total anno, total number of unigenes or transcripts annotated in at least one public database. (5) Total, total number of assembled unigenes or transcripts.
Table 4. Representative differentially expressed genes related to redox metabolism and hormone-related signaling between BR10 and CK treatments.
Table 4. Representative differentially expressed genes related to redox metabolism and hormone-related signaling between BR10 and CK treatments.
Gene IDPutative AnnotationFunctional Categorylog2FC (BR10/CK)Adjusted p ValueRegulationPossible Relevance
TRINITY_DN3065_c0_g1Peroxidase 10-likeRedox/peroxidase activity−5.356.989 × 10−4DownHydrogen peroxide catabolism and oxidative-stress response
TRINITY_DN35240_c0_g1Catalase-peroxidase-likeRedox/catalase-peroxidase activity−4.882.646 × 10−2DownHydrogen peroxide catabolism; consistent with altered CAT/POD activity
TRINITY_DN1558_c0_g1Lignin-forming anionic peroxidase-likeRedox/peroxidase activity1.889.797 × 10−4UpMay contribute to increased POD activity and cell-wall/redox adjustment
TRINITY_DN6479_c0_g1Glutathione S-transferase-likeGlutathione metabolism/detoxification−1.202.307 × 10−2DownAssociated with glutathione-related redox regulation
TRINITY_DN5333_c0_g1Ferredoxin--NADP reductase-likeOxidoreductase/photosynthetic electron transfer−5.794.631 × 10−2DownRelated to electron transfer and oxidoreductase activity
TRINITY_DN48757_c0_g1Tetrahydroxynaphthalene reductase-likeOxidoreductase activity−5.397.660 × 10−3DownRepresents oxidoreductase-related transcriptional response
TRINITY_DN31901_c0_g1bZIP transcription factor TGA10-likePlant hormone signal transduction/SA-related signaling−4.721.831 × 10−4DownMay be associated with salicylate-related signaling changes
TRINITY_DN3262_c0_g1Ethylene-responsive transcription factor ERF114-likeEthylene/ACC-related signaling1.581.072 × 10−3UpMay be linked with ACC/ethylene-related signaling response
TRINITY_DN41788_c0_g1Cytochrome P450 CYP72A616-likeMonooxygenase/hormone-related metabolism2.441.171 × 10−3UpPossible involvement in hormone-related or secondary metabolic adjustment
TRINITY_DN25032_c1_g3Calcium-dependent protein kinase 15-likeCalcium-mediated signaling8.731.987 × 10−8UpMay link BR10 response with phosphorylation-mediated signaling
TRINITY_DN11357_c0_g1WRKY transcription factor 6-likeStress/hormone-related transcriptional regulation1.342.307 × 10−2UpCandidate transcriptional regulator of stress/hormone responses
TRINITY_DN14657_c0_g2WRKY transcription factor 29-likeMAPK signaling pathway/transcription regulation1.233.863 × 10−2UpAssociated with MAPK-related signaling and transcriptional response
log2FC > 0 indicates upregulation under BR10 relative to CK, whereas log2FC < 0 indicates downregulation. These genes were selected from significant DEGs with adjusted p < 0.05 and |log2FC| ≥ 1. They should be regarded as candidate genes because qRT-PCR validation was not performed in the present study. Under the current screening thresholds, no significant DEG was clearly annotated as BRI1, BZR1, or a cytokinin biosynthesis/signaling component; therefore, these pathways require further targeted validation in future studies.
Table 5. Antioxidant enzyme activities in bud tissues of Zelkova schneideriana under CK and BR10 treatments at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment.
Table 5. Antioxidant enzyme activities in bud tissues of Zelkova schneideriana under CK and BR10 treatments at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment.
EnzymeCKBR10
SOD146.06 ± 5.01 a119.97 ± 7.26 b
CAT0.662 ± 0.001 a0.356 ± 0.001 b
POD0.340 ± 0.014 b0.486 ± 0.021 a
APX0.562 ± 0.014 a0.478 ± 0.016 b
GR0.602 ± 0.036 a0.204 ± 0.006 b
Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for the same enzyme at p < 0.05. CK, water-treated control; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; POD, peroxidase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; GR, glutathione reductase.
Table 6. Representative endogenous hormones and hormone-related metabolites (nmol/L) in bud tissues of Zelkova schneideriana under CK and BR10 treatments at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment.
Table 6. Representative endogenous hormones and hormone-related metabolites (nmol/L) in bud tissues of Zelkova schneideriana under CK and BR10 treatments at the end of the 40-day incubation period after hormone treatment.
Hormone or Hormone-Related MetaboliteCKBR10
BL348.37 ± 23.46 b23,215.08 ± 522.59 a
ABA66.26 ± 1.85 a65.99 ± 1.21 a
ACC3434.54 ± 223.11 a1806.64 ± 33.90 b
GA314.68 ± 0.84 a7.98 ± 0.36 b
GA416.36 ± 0.19 a9.92 ± 0.32 b
IAA86.82 ± 3.10 a60.60 ± 2.93 b
JA311.54 ± 9.17 a96.01 ± 1.15 b
SA3870.95 ± 194.36 a2439.40 ± 94.72 b
Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 4) in nmol/L. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for the same metabolite at p < 0.05. CK, water-treated control; BL, brassinolide; ABA, abscisic acid; ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; GA3, gibberellic acid 3; GA4, gibberellic acid 4; IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; JA, jasmonic acid; SA, salicylic acid.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Rao, X.; Li, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Yan, J. Effects of Exogenous Hormone Treatments on Seed Germination and Transcriptome Analysis in Zelkova schneideriana. Forests 2026, 17, 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050616

AMA Style

Zhao X, Li J, Rao X, Li D, Liu X, Zhang R, Liu J, Yan J. Effects of Exogenous Hormone Treatments on Seed Germination and Transcriptome Analysis in Zelkova schneideriana. Forests. 2026; 17(5):616. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050616

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xin, Jianan Li, Xiaohui Rao, Dong Li, Xueyu Liu, Rongrong Zhang, Jianbing Liu, and Jindong Yan. 2026. "Effects of Exogenous Hormone Treatments on Seed Germination and Transcriptome Analysis in Zelkova schneideriana" Forests 17, no. 5: 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050616

APA Style

Zhao, X., Li, J., Rao, X., Li, D., Liu, X., Zhang, R., Liu, J., & Yan, J. (2026). Effects of Exogenous Hormone Treatments on Seed Germination and Transcriptome Analysis in Zelkova schneideriana. Forests, 17(5), 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050616

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop