Tree Species Effects on Microbial Nutrient Limitation in Afforested Mine Soils Revealed by Enzyme Stoichiometry and Substrate-Induced Respiration
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Site
2.2. Soil Sampling and Sample Preparation
2.3. Chemical Analyses
2.4. Enzyme Analyses
2.5. Vector Analysis of Ecoenzyme Activities
2.6. Substrate-Induced Respiration Measurements
2.7. Statistical Analysis of Data
3. Results
3.1. Chemical Properties of Soils
3.2. Enzyme Activities
3.3. SIR Measurements
4. Discussion
4.1. Soil Chemical Properties
4.2. C, N, and P Limitation Revealed by Soil Enzymatic Activities and Substrate-Induced Respiration
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AcPh | Acid Phosphomonoesterase |
| AlkPh | Alkaline Phosphomonoesterase |
| BG | β-1,4-Glucosidase |
| EES | Ecoenzymatic Stoichiometry |
| LAP | L-leucine Aminopeptidase |
| NAG | β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase |
| SIR | Substrate-Induced Respiration |
| SOC | Soil Organic Carbon |
| WHC | Water Holding Capacity |
References
- Vindušková, O.; Pánek, T.; Frouz, J. Soil C, N and P dynamics along a 13 ka chronosequence of landslides under semi-natural temperate forest. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2019, 213, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hüblová, L.; Frouz, J. Contrasting effect of coniferous and broadleaf trees on soil carbon storage during reforestation of forest soils and afforestation of agricultural and post-mining soils. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 290, 112567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Duan, C.; Niu, Y.; Sun, R.; Shen, Y.; Guo, X.; Fang, L. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry reveals phosphorus addition alleviates microbial nutrient limitation and promotes soil carbon sequestration in agricultural ecosystems. J. Soils Sediments 2022, 22, 536–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorenz, M.; Thiele-Bruhn, S. Tree species affect soil organic matter stocks and stoichiometry in interaction with soil microbiota. Geoderma 2019, 353, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demoling, F.; Figuera, D.; Bååth, E. Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 2485–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berg, B. Decomposition patterns for foliar litter–a theory for influencing factors. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zipper, C.E.; Burger, J.; Skousen, J.G.; Angel, P.N.; Barton, C.D.; Davis, V.; Franklin, J.A. Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on Appalachian coal surface mines. Environ. Manag. 2011, 47, 751–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cross, A.T.; Ivanov, D.; Stevens, J.C.; Sadler, R.; Zhong, H.; Lambers, H.; Dixon, K.W. Nitrogen limitation and calcifuge plant strategies constrain the establishment of native vegetation on magnetite mine tailings. Plant Soil 2021, 461, 181–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manimel Wadu, M.C.W.; Duan, M.; Chang, S.X. Phosphorus availability and fractionation vary among forest site types in reconstructed oil sands soils. Can. J. For. Res. 2017, 47, 1372–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chodak, M.; Sroka, K.; Pietrzykowski, M. Activity of phosphatases and microbial phosphorus under various tree species growing on reclaimed technosols. Geoderma 2021, 401, 115320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soong, J.L.; Fuchslueger, L.; Maranon-Jimenez, S.; Torn, M.S.; Janssens, I.A.; Penuelas, J.; Richter, A. Microbial carbon limitation: The need for integrating microorganisms into our understanding of ecosystem carbon cycling. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 1953–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chodak, M.; Niklińska, M. The effect of different tree species on the chemical and microbial properties of reclaimed mine soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2010, 46, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Jin, P.; Wang, H.; Hu, T.; Lin, X.; Xie, Z. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry reveals stronger microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in biochar amendment soils: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 838, 156532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moorhead, D.; Rinkes, Z.; Sinsabaugh, R.; Weintraub, M. Dynamic relationships between microbial biomass, respiration, inorganic nutrients and enzyme activities: Informing enzyme-based decomposition models. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moorhead, D.L.; Sinsabaugh, R.L.; Hill, B.H.; Weintraub, M.N. Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 93, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinsabaugh, R.L.; Lauber, C.L.; Weintraub, M.N.; Ahmed, B.; Allison, S.D.; Crenshaw, C.; Contosta, A.R.; Cusack, D.; Frey, S.; Gallo, M.E.; et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 1252–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapia-Torres, Y.; Elser, J.J.; Souza, V.; García Oliva, F. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry at the extremes: How microbes cope in an ultra-oligotrophic desert soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 87, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Xu, Y.; Gao, D.; Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Deng, J.; Han, X.; Yang, G.; Feng, Y.; Ren, G. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and nutrient dynamics along a revegetation chronosequence in the soils of abandoned land and Robinia pseudoacacia plantation on the Loess Plateau, China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 134, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosinger, C.; Rousk, J.; Sandén, H. Can enzymatic stoichiometry be used to determine growth-limiting nutrients for microorganisms?-A critical assessment in two subtropical soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 128, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mori, T. Does ecoenzymatic stoichiometry really determine microbial nutrient limitations? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 107816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawada, K.; Inagaki, Y.; Toyota, K.; Kosaki, T.; Funakawa, S. Substrate-induced respiration responses to nitrogen and/or phosphorus additions in soils from different climatic and land use conditions. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2017, 83, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietrzykowski, M.; Gruba, P.; Sproull, G. The effectiveness of Yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L.) green manure cropping in sand mine cast reclamation. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 102, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chodak, M.; Pietrzykowski, M.; Niklińska, M. Development of microbial properties in a chronosequence of sandy mine soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2009, 41, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Carvalho Mendes, I. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Enzyme Activities—β-glucosidases, Arylsulfatase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, Dehydrogenase, Phosphomonoesterases; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daughtridge, R.C.; Nakayama, Y.; Margenot, A.J. Sources of abiotic hydrolysis of chromogenic substrates in soil enzyme assays: Storage, termination, and incubation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 158, 108245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.P.E.; Domsch, K.H. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1978, 10, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleveland, C.C.; Liptzin, D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: Is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 2007, 85, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A.; Mosquera-Losada, M.R.; Fernández-Núñez, E. Afforestation of agricultural land with Pinus radiata D. don and Betula alba L. in NW Spain: Effects on soil pH, understorey production and floristic diversity eleven years after establishment. Land Degrad. Dev. 2012, 23, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgess-Conforti, J.R.; Moore, P.A.; Owens, P.R.; Miller, D.M.; Ashworth, A.J.; Hays, P.D.; Evans-White, M.A.; Anderson, K.R. Are soils beneath coniferous tree stands more acidic than soils beneath deciduous tree stands? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 14920–14929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prescott, C.E.; Zabek, L.M.; Staley, C.L.; Kabzems, R. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: Influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures. Can. J. For. Res. 2000, 30, 1742–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vesterdal, L.; De Vos, B.; Vanguelova, E.; Hansen, K. Tree species is the major factor explaining C:N ratios in European forest soils. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 311, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansson, K.; Fröberg, M.; Helmisaari, H.-S.; Kleja, D.B.; Olsson, B.A.; Olsson, M.; Persson, T. Carbon and nitrogen pools and fluxes above and below ground in spruce, pine and birch stands in southern Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 309, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, T.R.; Trofymow, J.A.; Prescott, C.E.; Fyles, J.; Titus, B.D. Patterns of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing foliar litter in Canadian forests. Ecosystems 2006, 9, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Min, K. Similar microbial carbon limitation with soil depth despite decreasing carbon availability. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 35, e2506002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spohn, M.; Kuzyakov, Y. Phosphorus mineralization can be driven by microbial need for carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 61, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spohn, M.; Schleuss, P.M. Addition of inorganic phosphorus to soil leads to desorption of organic compounds and thus to increased soil respiration. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 130, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vance, C.P.; Graham, P.H.; Allan, D.L. Biological nitrogen fixation: Phosphorus-a critical future need? In Nitrogen Fixation: From Molecules to Crop Productivity; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 509–514. [Google Scholar]
- Rastetter, E.B.; Vitousek, P.M.; Field, C.; Shaver, G.R.; Herbert, D.; Gren, G.I. Resource optimization and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Ecosystems 2001, 4, 369–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanerva, S.; Kitunen, V.; Loponen, J.; Smolander, A. Phenolic compounds and terpenes in soil organic horizon layers under silver birch, Norway spruce and Scots pine. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2008, 44, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamczyk, B.; Kitunen, V.; Smolander, A. Protein precipitation by tannins in soil organic horizon and vegetation in relation to tree species. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2008, 45, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preston, C.M.; Trofymow, J.A. Variability in litter quality and its relationship to litter decay in Canadian forests. Can. J. Bot. 2000, 78, 1269–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allison, S.D.; Weintraub, M.N.; Gartner, T.B.; Waldrop, M.P. Evolutionary-economic principles as regulators of soil enzyme production and ecosystem function. In Soil Enzymology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Species | C | N | P | C:N | C:P | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg g−1) | (mg g−1) | (µg g−1) | ||||
| Pine | 373 ± 22 a | 8.8 ± 4.4 ab | 492 ± 10 ab | 42.4 ± 1.9 a | 756 ± 32 a | 4.1 ± 0.1 b |
| Larch | 219 ± 23 ab | 6.2 ± 0.3 ab | 458 ± 32 ab | 35.2 ± 2.5 a | 474 ± 22 b | 4.2 ± 0.1 b |
| Birch | 63 ± 8 b | 2.7 ± 0.5 b | 238 ± 44 b | 24.5 ± 1.8 b | 279 ± 35 c | 5.3 ± 0.2 a |
| Alder | 228 ± 58 ab | 11.4 ± 2.7 a | 580 ± 103 a | 19.9 ± 0.5 b | 379 ± 29 bc | 5.4 ± 0.1 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kovalova, A.; Chodak, M. Tree Species Effects on Microbial Nutrient Limitation in Afforested Mine Soils Revealed by Enzyme Stoichiometry and Substrate-Induced Respiration. Forests 2026, 17, 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050543
Kovalova A, Chodak M. Tree Species Effects on Microbial Nutrient Limitation in Afforested Mine Soils Revealed by Enzyme Stoichiometry and Substrate-Induced Respiration. Forests. 2026; 17(5):543. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050543
Chicago/Turabian StyleKovalova, Anastasiia, and Marcin Chodak. 2026. "Tree Species Effects on Microbial Nutrient Limitation in Afforested Mine Soils Revealed by Enzyme Stoichiometry and Substrate-Induced Respiration" Forests 17, no. 5: 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050543
APA StyleKovalova, A., & Chodak, M. (2026). Tree Species Effects on Microbial Nutrient Limitation in Afforested Mine Soils Revealed by Enzyme Stoichiometry and Substrate-Induced Respiration. Forests, 17(5), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050543

