The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Tree Species as Drivers of C Inputs to Soil
2.1. Litter Production
2.2. Litter Quality
2.3. Root System Characteristics
2.4. Mycorrhizal Associations (AM vs. ECM Species)
3. Control of SOC Fractions by Tree Species
3.1. Labile SOC Pools
3.1.1. Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC)
3.1.2. Permanganate-Oxidizable Carbon (POXC)
3.1.3. Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC)
3.2. The Intermediate SOC Pool (IC)
Particulate Organic Carbon (POC)
3.3. The Passive SOC Pool (PC)
Mineral-Associated Organic C (MAOC)
4. Tree Species Effects on Soil Carbon Stabilization Pathways
4.1. Mineral-Associated C Formation
4.2. Soil Physical Protection and Aggregation
5. Species-Specific Rhizosphere Processes and Priming Effects
5.1. Variability of Root Exudate Quantity and Chemical Composition Among Species
5.2. Microbial Community Responses in the Rhizosphere
5.3. Enzyme Activities and SOC Decomposition
5.4. Positive and Negative Priming Effects
6. Influence of Tree Species Diversity and Forest Mixtures on SOC Dynamics
6.1. Complementarity in Litter and Root Inputs in Mixed Forests
6.2. Effects of Tree Species Diversity on Microbial Diversity and Function
6.3. SOC Dynamics in Mixed-Species vs. Monoculture Forests
6.4. Temporal Stability of SOC in Species-Rich Forests
7. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Razzaghi, S.; Kapur, S.; Islam, R.K.; Rezaei, M.; Valizadeh, A.; Lagomarsino, A. Protected carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry in soils under red pine and oak forests. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2021, 30, 11047–11056. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, I.U. Forest soil C: Stock and stability under global change. In New Perspectives in Forest Science; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; p. 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tate, K.; Ross, D.; O’brien, B.; Kelliher, F. Carbon storage and turnover, and respiratory activity, in the litter and soil of an old-growth southern beech (Nothofagus) forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1993, 25, 1601–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lichter, J.; Billings, S.A.; Ziegler, S.E.; Gaindh, D.; Ryals, R.; Finzi, A.C.; Jackson, R.B.; Stemmler, E.A.; Schlesinger, W.H. Soil carbon sequestration in a pine forest after 9 years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Glob. Change Biol. 2008, 14, 2910–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razzaghi, S.; Islam, K.R.; Ahmed, I.A.M. Deforestation impacts soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools and carbon lability under Mediterranean climates. J. Soils Sediments 2022, 22, 2381–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Huang, Z.L.; Xiao, W.F.; Tan, M.Z. Advances on effect of forest management on soil carbon sequestration. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 2012, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Bouwman, A.F.; Leemans, R. The role of forest soils in the global carbon cycle. In Carbon Forms and Functions in Forest Soils; Soil Science Society America: Madison, WI, USA, 1995; pp. 503–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babur, E.; Dindaroglu, T. Seasonal changes of soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in different forest ecosystems. In Environmental Factors Affecting Human Health; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Li, J.; Yao, L. Soil microbial community and physicochemical properties together drive soil organic carbon in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations of different stand ages. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zha, T.; Luo, Z.; Zheng, J.; Sun, O.J. Predicting soil respiration using carbon stock in roots, litter and soil organic matter in forests of Loess Plateau in China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 57, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Supriya, K. Carbon Sequestration and Storage: Traits that Influence Forest Carbon Dynamics. In Enhancing Forest Resilience through Plant Functional Traits; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2025; pp. 144–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lal, R. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 220, 242–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Z.; Nie, Y.; Ming, A.; Yang, K.; Min, H.; Wei, H.; Shen, W. Tree species mixing promotes surface soil organic carbon accumulation in mid-age and stability in old-growth forests. Plant Soil 2025, 512, 711–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hobbie, S.E.; Ogdahl, M.; Chorover, J.; Chadwick, O.A.; Oleksyn, J.; Zytkowiak, R.; Reich, P.B. Tree species effects on soil organic matter dynamics: The role of soil cation composition. Ecosystems 2007, 10, 999–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; He, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, S.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Fu, S. Leaf litter contributes more to soil organic carbon than fine roots in two 10-year-old subtropical plantations. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gessner, M.O.; Chauvet, E. Importance of stream microfungi in controlling breakdown rates of leaf litter. Ecology 1994, 75, 1807–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berendse, F.; Berg, B.; Bosatta, E. The effect of lignin and nitrogen on the decomposition of litter in nutrient-poor ecosystems: A theoretical approach. Can. J. Bot. 1987, 65, 1116–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, P.; Fu, R.; Nottingham, A.T.; Domeignoz-Horta, L.A.; Yang, X.; Du, H.; Wang, K.; Li, D. Tree species diversity increases soil microbial carbon use efficiency in a subtropical forest. Glob. Change Biol. 2023, 29, 7131–7144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haq, H.u.; Hauer, A.; Singavarapu, B.; Christel, H.; Cesarz, S.; Eisenhauer, N.; Ferlian, O.; Bruelheide, H.; Wubet, T. The interactive effect of tree mycorrhizal type, mycorrhizal type mixture and tree diversity shapes rooting zone soil fungal communities in temperate forest ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2025, 39, 1441–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortaş, I.; Razzaghi, S.; Rafique, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizae: Effect of rhizosphere and relation with carbon nutrition. In Plant-Microbe Interaction: An Approach to Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 125–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staszel-Szlachta, K.; Błońska, E.; Lasota, J. Stabilization of soil organic matter in Luvisols under the influence of various tree species in temperate forests. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.; Xu, L. Effects of tree species composition in plantation forest on soil aggregate stability and organic carbon pools in northeastern China. Geoderma Reg. 2024, 39, e00899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razzaghi, S. The effect of soil organic carbon fractions on soil properties and crop yield. In Innovative Agricultural and Environmental Solutions; Bellitürk, K., Bara, M.F., Çelik, A., Eds.; Iksad Publishing House: Ankara, Türkiye, 2022; pp. 99–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, I.; Mahmood, T.; Islam, K.R. Effect of long term no-till and conventional tillage practices on soil quality. Soil Tillage Res. 2013, 131, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellegrini, S.; Elio Agnelli, A.; Costanza Andrenelli, M.; Barbetti, R.; Castelli, F.; Costantini, E.A.; Lagomarsino, A.; Pasqui, M.; Tomozeiu, R.; Razzaghi, S. Dynamics of aggregate stability and soil organic C distribution as affected by climatic aggressiveness: A mesocosm approach. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 27 April–2 May 2014; p. 6978. [Google Scholar]
- Álvaro-Fuentes, J.; Cantero-Martínez, C.; López, M.; Paustian, K.; Denef, K.; Stewart, C.; Arrúe, J. Soil aggregation and soil organic carbon stabilization: Effects of management in semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rondon, T.; Hernandez, R.M.; Guzman, M. Soil organic carbon, physical fractions of the macro-organic matter, and soil stability relationship in lacustrine soils under banana crop. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Razzaghi, S.; Vignozzi, N.; Kapur, S. Mineralogical and micromorphological characteristics of red pine and oak root zone soils in southern Turkey. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2017, 41, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.T.; Supronienė, S.; Žvirdauskienė, R.; Aleinikovienė, J. Climate, soil, and microbes: Interactions shaping organic matter decomposition in croplands. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lal, R.; Monger, C.; Nave, L.; Smith, P. The role of soil in regulation of climate. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2021, 376, 20210084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, A.; Zha, T.; Zhang, Z. Variations in soil organic carbon storage and stability with vegetation restoration stages on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena 2023, 228, 107142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razzaghi, S.; Aslan, P. Soil organic carbon fraction dynamics and morphological responses of Allium species under Chlorella vulgaris application. ISPEC J. Agric. Sci. 2026, 10, 166–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajjad, H.; Kumar, P.; Srivastava, P.K.; Pathak, S.O.; Ahmed, M.; Kumar, V.; Dobriyal, M.; Kumari, P.; Pandey, P.C. Assessing soil organic carbon and its relation with biophysical and ecological parameters in tropical forest ecosystem India. Geocarto Int. 2025, 40, 2441388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorenz, K.; Lal, R. The importance of carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. In Carbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystems; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 241–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholz, H.L. Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area, and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 1982, 63, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zianis, D.; Mencuccini, M. Aboveground net primary productivity of a beech (Fagus moesiaca) forest: A case study of Naousa forest, northern Greece. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonan, G.B. Importance of leaf area index and forest type when estimating photosynthesis in boreal forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 1993, 43, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petritan, I.C.; Mihăilă, V.-V.; Bragă, C.I.; Boura, M.; Vasile, D.; Petritan, A.M. Litterfall production and leaf area index in a virgin european beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)–Silver fir (Abies alba mill.) forest. Dendrobiology 2020, 83, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.M.; Black, T.A. Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 1992, 15, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Tian, F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Schurgers, G.; Fensholt, R. Acceleration of global vegetation greenup from combined effects of climate change and human land management. Glob. Change Biol. 2018, 24, 5484–5499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, G.; Hu, R.; Luo, J.; Weiss, M.; Jiang, H.; Mu, X.; Xie, D.; Zhang, W. Review of indirect optical measurements of leaf area index: Recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 265, 390–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kala, J.; Decker, M.; Exbrayat, J.-F.; Pitman, A.J.; Carouge, C.; Evans, J.P.; Abramowitz, G.; Mocko, D. Influence of leaf area index prescriptions on simulations of heat, moisture, and carbon fluxes. J. Hydrometeorol. 2014, 15, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tupek, B.; Mäkipää, R.; Heikkinen, J.; Peltoniemi, M.; Ukonmaanaho, L.; Hokkanen, T.; Nöjd, P.; Nevalainen, S.; Lindgren, M.; Lehtonen, A. Foliar Turnover Rates in Finland-Comparing Estimates from Needle-Cohort and Litterfall-Biomass Methods; Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board: Helsinki, Finland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Muukkonen, P. Needle biomass turnover rates of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) derived from the needle-shed dynamics. Trees 2005, 19, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aerts, R.; Chapin, F.S., III. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. In Advances in Ecological Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; Volume 30, pp. 1–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gleason, S.; Ares, A.; Scarggs, A. Foliar resorption in tree species. In New Research on Forest Ecology; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
- Vergutz, L.; Manzoni, S.; Porporato, A.; Novais, R.F.; Jackson, R.B. Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants. Ecol. Monogr. 2012, 82, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, Y.; Gong, F.; Yang, X.; Chen, X.; Su, Y.; Liu, L.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Sun, Q. Litterfall seasonality and adaptive strategies of tropical and subtropical evergreen forests in China. J. Plant Ecol. 2022, 15, 320–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Li, Q.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Hu, X.; Qi, J.; Lu, Z. The leaf litterfall pattern in an old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest and its implication for leaf litter mixing studies. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2024, 54, e03121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, B.B.; Han, S.H.; Hernandez, J.O.; An, J.Y.; Youn, W.B.; Choi, H.-S.; Jung, S. Leaf litter decomposition of deciduous Quercus acutissima Carruth. and evergreen Quercus glauca Thunb. in an inter-site experiment in three contrasting temperate forest stands in South Korea. Ann. For. Sci. 2021, 78, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaneko, N.; Salamanca, E. Mixed leaf litter effects on decomposition rates and soil microarthropod communities in an oak–pine stand in Japan. Ecol. Res. 1999, 14, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornelissen, J. An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. J. Ecol. 1996, 84, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niinemets, Ü.; Tamm, Ü. Species differences in timing of leaf fall and foliage chemistry modify nutrient resorption efficiency in deciduous temperate forest stands. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polyakova, O.; Billor, N. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 253, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swift, M.J.; Heal, O.W.; Anderson, J.M.; Anderson, J. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems; University of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA, 1979; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Melillo, J.M.; Aber, J.D.; Muratore, J.F. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 1982, 63, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, B.R.; Parkinson, D.; Parsons, W.F. Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: A microcosm test. Ecology 1989, 70, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artemkina, N. Relationships between Phenolic Compounds, Tannins, Lignin, Nitrogen, and Carbon in the Plants of Dwarf Shrub-Green Moss Spruce Forests of the Kola Peninsula, Russia. Russ. J. Ecol. 2023, 54, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Q.; Huai, Z.; Luqman, R.; Enamul, H.M.; Yu, F.; Sun, C.; Xu, T.; Ma, J. Land-type conversion reshapes microbial engines: Decoding litter decomposition dynamics in the Yellow River wetland soils. Authorea 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hättenschwiler, S. Effects of tree species diversity on litter quality and decomposition. In Forest Diversity and Function: Temperate and Boreal Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, C.; Xiao, L.; Shen, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, W. Effects of tree species on mineral soil C, N, and P, litter and root chemical compositions: Cross-sites comparisons and their relationship decoupling in Northeast China. Trees 2021, 35, 1971–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotrufo, M.F.; Ineson, P.; Rowland, A. Decomposition of tree leaf litters grown under elevated CO2: Effect of litter quality. Plant Soil 1994, 163, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thirunavukkarasu, A. Lignin Degradation Dynamics in Boreal Forest Soils. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentile, R.; Vanlauwe, B.; Six, J. Litter quality impacts short-but not long-term soil carbon dynamics in soil aggregate fractions. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fanin, N.; Bertrand, I. Aboveground litter quality is a better predictor than belowground microbial communities when estimating carbon mineralization along a land-use gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 94, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paustian, K.; Ågren, G.; Bosatta, E. Modelling litter quality effects on decomposition and soil organic matter dynamics. In Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition Conference; Cadisch, G., Giller, K.E., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1997; pp. 313–335. [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson, F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, K.L.; Lynch, J.P.; Jablokow, A.G.; Curtis, P.S. Carbon cost of root systems: An architectural approach. Plant Soil 1994, 165, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, R.; Yetgin, A. An overall review on influence of root architecture on soil carbon sequestration potential. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2024, 36, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernando, E.A.J.; Selvaraj, M.; Uga, Y.; Busch, W.; Bowers, H.; Tohme, J. Going deep: Roots, carbon, and analyzing subsoil carbon dynamics. Mol. Plant 2024, 17, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Guan, D.; Chen, Y.; Motelica-Heino, M.; Peng, Y.; Lee, S.Y. The role of mangrove fine root production and decomposition on soil organic carbon component ratios. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, S.; Liu, X.; Jin, B.; Zhao, X. Contribution of fine roots to soil organic carbon accumulation in different desert communities in the sangong river basin. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sariyildiz, T. Effects of tree species and topography on fine and small root decomposition rates of three common tree species (Alnus glutinosa, Picea orientalis and Pinus sylvestris) in Turkey. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 335, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, R.B.; Mooney, H.A.; Schulze, E.-D. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7362–7366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gill, R.A.; Jackson, R.B. Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol. 2000, 147, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finzi, A.C.; Abramoff, R.Z.; Spiller, K.S.; Brzostek, E.R.; Darby, B.A.; Kramer, M.A.; Phillips, R.P. Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 21, 2082–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bardgett, R.D.; Mommer, L.; De Vries, F.T. Going underground: Root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier, I.C.; Tückmantel, T.; Heitkötter, J.; Müller, K.; Preusser, S.; Wrobel, T.J.; Kandeler, E.; Marschner, B.; Leuschner, C. Root exudation of mature beech forests across a nutrient availability gradient: The role of root morphology and fungal activity. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Averill, C.; Bhatnagar, J.M.; Dietze, M.C.; Pearse, W.D.; Kivlin, S.N. Global imprint of mycorrhizal fungi on whole-plant nutrient economics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 23163–23168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- van Der Heijden, M.G.; Martin, F.M.; Selosse, M.A.; Sanders, I.R. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: The past, the present, and the future. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1406–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leake, J.; Johnson, D.; Donnelly, D.; Muckle, G.; Boddy, L.; Read, D. Networks of power and influence: The role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1016–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jevon, F.V.; Lang, A.K. Tree biomass allocation differs by mycorrhizal association. Ecology 2022, 103, e3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Read, D.J.; Leake, J.R.; Perez-Moreno, J. Mycorrhizal fungi as drivers of ecosystem processes in heathland and boreal forest biomes. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1243–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, S.; Wurzburger, N.; Sulman, B.; Pries, C.H. Ectomycorrhizal effects on decomposition are highly dependent on fungal traits, climate, and litter properties: A model-based assessment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 184, 109073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortas, I.; Razzaghi, S. Effects of mycorrhizal inoculation and phosphorus fertilization on tomato, eggplant, green, and bell pepper plants’ yield and nutrient uptake under field conditions. Int. J. Innov. Hortic. 2025, 14, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Z.-F.; Xie, M.-X.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Li, X.; Li, H.-G.; Zhang, J.-L. Research progress in soil organic carbon stabilization mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2023, 29, 756–766. [Google Scholar]
- Lindahl, B.D.; Tunlid, A. Ectomycorrhizal fungi–potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1443–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Averill, C.; Turner, B.L.; Finzi, A.C. Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage. Nature 2014, 505, 543–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, L.; Dijkstra, F.A.; Phillips, R.P.; Zhu, B.; Wang, P.; Cheng, W. Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees cause a higher carbon to nitrogen ratio of soil organic matter decomposition via rhizosphere priming than ectomycorrhizal trees. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 157, 108246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willis, A.; Rodrigues, B.; Harris, P.J. The ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2013, 32, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parihar, M.; Rakshit, A.; Meena, V.S.; Gupta, V.K.; Rana, K.; Choudhary, M.; Tiwari, G.; Mishra, P.K.; Pattanayak, A.; Bisht, J.K. The potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in C cycling: A review. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 1581–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soudzilovskaia, N.A.; van der Heijden, M.G.; Cornelissen, J.H.; Makarov, M.I.; Onipchenko, V.G.; Maslov, M.N.; Akhmetzhanova, A.A.; van Bodegom, P.M. Quantitative assessment of the differential impacts of arbuscular and ectomycorrhiza on soil carbon cycling. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.; Bradford, M.A.; Ward, E.B. Radiocarbon evidence of the role of tree mycorrhizal type in modulating mean soil carbon age. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 27 April–2 May 2025; p. EGU25-14043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carteron, A.; Cichonski, F.; Laliberté, E. Ectomycorrhizal stands accelerate decomposition to a greater extent than arbuscular mycorrhizal stands in a northern deciduous forest. Ecosystems 2022, 25, 1234–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyanka, K. Soil carbon: An overview on soil carbon function and its fractionation. Curr. World Environ. 2016, 11, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razzaghi, S. Unraveling the Impact of Diverse Vegetative Covers on Soil Carbon Fractions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, Y.; Liao, J.; An, S. Importance of soil labile organic carbon fractions in shaping microbial community after vegetation restoration. Catena 2023, 220, 106707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Min, F.; Yu, D.; Xin, Z.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Sun, X.; Pan, J. Mean residence times of active and slow soil organic carbon pools in croplands across China. Catena 2021, 202, 105271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, K.R.; Roth, G.; Rahman, M.A.; Didenko, N.O.; Reeder, R.C. Cover crop complements flue gas desulfurized gypsum to improve no-till soil quality. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2021, 52, 926–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco-Moure, N.; Gracia, R.; Bielsa, A.C.; López, M.V. Soil organic matter fractions as affected by tillage and soil texture under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 2016, 155, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bongiorno, G.; Bünemann, E.K.; Oguejiofor, C.U.; Meier, J.; Gort, G.; Comans, R.; Mäder, P.; Brussaard, L.; de Goede, R. Sensitivity of labile carbon fractions to tillage and organic matter management and their potential as comprehensive soil quality indicators across pedoclimatic conditions in Europe. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 99, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, F.; Hu, Y.-K.; Gong, Y.-M.; Yang, X.-J.; Liu, Y.-Y. Desert soil organic carbon characterized by the vertical distribution of soil microbial carbon. J. Desert Res. 2012, 33, 777–781. [Google Scholar]
- Semenov, V.; Lebedeva, T.; Sokolov, D.; Zinyakova, N.; Lopes de Gerenu, V.; Semenov, M. Measurement of the soil organic carbon pools isolated using bio-physical-chemical fractionation methods. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2023, 56, 1327–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, P.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Cai, L.; Jiao, Y.; Li, Z.; Han, G. Changes in soil particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon concentrations under nitrogen addition in China—A meta-analysis. Plant Soil 2023, 489, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Minasny, B.; Setia, R.; Zhou, Z.; Ren, C.; Biswas, A.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, L.; Shi, Z.; Chen, S. Global distribution and predictors of the mineral-associated to total soil organic carbon ratio: An indicator of soil carbon stability. Earth Crit. Zone 2025, 2, 100035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Rossel, R.A.V.; Wang, G.; Xiao, L.; Wang, M.; Zhang, S.; Luo, Z. Particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon turnover revealed by modelling their long-term dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 173, 108780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marschner, B.; Kalbitz, K. Controls of bioavailability and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils. Geoderma 2003, 113, 211–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Liu, X.; Blosser, G.D.; Rücker, A.M.; Conner, W.H.; Chow, A.T. Molecular dynamics of foliar litter and dissolved organic matter during the decomposition process. Biogeochemistry 2020, 150, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, K.; Kalbitz, K. Cycling downwards–dissolved organic matter in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 52, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansson, K.; Kleja, D.B.; Kalbitz, K.; Larsson, H. Amounts of carbon mineralised and leached as DOC during decomposition of Norway spruce needles and fine roots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, S.; Yue, K.; Peñuelas, J.; Svenning, J.-C.; Van Meerbeek, K.; Peng, Y.; Wu, Q.; Fan, Y.; Heděnec, P.; Li, Z. Forest streams may discharge one tenth of the annual total global forest carbon sink through dissolved organic carbon. Innov. Geosci. 2025, 3, 100148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canuel, E.A.; Cammer, S.S.; McIntosh, H.A.; Pondell, C.R. Climate change impacts on the organic carbon cycle at the land-ocean interface. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2012, 40, 685–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casas-Ruiz, J.P.; Bodmer, P.; Bona, K.A.; Butman, D.; Couturier, M.; Emilson, E.J.; Finlay, K.; Genet, H.; Hayes, D.; Karlsson, J. Integrating terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to constrain estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isidorov, V.; Maslowiecka, J.; Sarapultseva, P. Bidirectional emission of organic compounds by decaying leaf litter of a number of forest-forming tree species in the northern hemisphere. Geoderma 2024, 443, 116812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uselman, S.M.; Qualls, R.G.; Lilienfein, J. Production of total potentially soluble organic C, N, and P across an ecosystem chronosequence: Root versus leaf litter. Ecosystems 2009, 12, 240–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wölfelschneider, M.; Dittmar, T.; Hatje, V.; Seidel, M. The influence of mangrove forests on estuarine dynamics of dissolved organic matter. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2025, 101, 1191–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, W.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, B. Responses of Soil Dissolved Organic Carbon to Climate Warming: A Review. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2024, 60, 758–766. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.; Wu, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, Q.; Zhou, J.; Hess, N.J.; Hazen, T.C.; Yang, W.; Chakraborty, R. Microbial interactions with dissolved organic matter drive carbon dynamics and community succession. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Malik, A.; Gleixner, G. Importance of microbial soil organic matter processing in dissolved organic carbon production. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 86, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalbitz, K.; Kaiser, K. Contribution of dissolved organic matter to carbon storage in forest mineral soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2008, 171, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalbitz, K.; Solinger, S.; Park, J.-H.; Michalzik, B.; Matzner, E. Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: A review. Soil Sci. 2000, 165, 277–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fröberg, M.; Hansson, K.; Kleja, D.B.; Alavi, G. Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen leaching from Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch stands in southern Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 1742–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansson, K.; Olsson, B.A.; Olsson, M.; Johansson, U.; Kleja, D.B. Differences in soil properties in adjacent stands of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch in SW Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersen, M.; Raulund-Rasmussen, K.; Strobel, B.; Hansen, H. The effects of tree species and site on the solubility of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2004, 154, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.-W.; Zheng, Z.; Ji, J.-H.; Mao, R. Non-additive effects on biodegradation of moso bamboo litter-and broadleaf tree litter-leached dissolved organic matter mixtures in a subtropical forest of southern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 915, 170104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Culman, S.W.; Snapp, S.S.; Freeman, M.A.; Schipanski, M.E.; Beniston, J.; Lal, R.; Drinkwater, L.E.; Franzluebbers, A.J.; Glover, J.D.; Grandy, A.S. Permanganate oxidizable carbon reflects a processed soil fraction that is sensitive to management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2012, 76, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weil, R.R.; Islam, K.R.; Stine, M.A.; Gruver, J.B.; Samson-Liebig, S.E. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field use. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 2003, 18, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chambers, L.G.; Mirabito, A.J.; Brew, S.; Nitsch, C.K.; Bhadha, J.H.; Hurst, N.R.; Berkowitz, J.F. Evaluating permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC)’s potential for differentiating carbon pools in wetland soils. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 167, 112624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fine, A.K.; Van Es, H.M.; Schindelbeck, R.R. Statistics, scoring functions, and regional analysis of a comprehensive soil health database. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2017, 81, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraus, T.E.; Dahlgren, R.A.; Zasoski, R.J. Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems-a review. Plant Soil 2003, 256, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, F.C.; Bacon, A.; Fox, T.R.; Jokela, E.J.; Kane, M.B.; Martin, T.A.; Noormets, A.; Ross, C.W.; Vogel, J.; Markewitz, D. A regional assessment of permanganate oxidizable carbon for potential use as a soil health indicator in managed pine plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 521, 120423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Mahé, S.; Ineson, P.; Staddon, P.; Ostle, N.; Cliquet, J.-B.; Francez, A.-J.; Fitter, A.H.; Young, J.P.W. Active root-inhabiting microbes identified by rapid incorporation of plant-derived carbon into RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16970–16975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woś, B.; Józefowska, A.; Likus-Cieślik, J.; Chodak, M.; Pietrzykowski, M. Effect of tree species and soil texture on the carbon stock, macronutrient content, and physicochemical properties of regenerated postfire forest soils. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 5227–5240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, V. Impacts of forest harvesting on biological processes in northern forest soils. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 133, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Liu, Q.; Wang, S.; Yang, G.; Xue, S. A global meta-analysis of the impacts of exotic plant species invasion on plant diversity and soil properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martin-Guay, M.O.; Belluau, M.; Côté, B.; Handa, I.T.; Jewell, M.D.; Khlifa, R.; Munson, A.D.; Rivest, M.; Whalen, J.K.; Rivest, D. Tree identity and diversity directly affect soil moisture and temperature but not soil carbon ten years after planting. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e8509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ao, L.; Zhao, M.; Li, X.; Sun, G. Different urban forest tree species affect the assembly of the soil bacterial and fungal community. Microb. Ecol. 2022, 83, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhuyan, S.; Tripathi, O.; Khan, M. Seasonal changes in soil microbial biomass under different agro-ecosystems of Arunachal Pradesh, North East India. J. Agric. Sci.-Sri Lanka 2013, 8, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Deb, S.; Sahoo, S.S.; Sahoo, U.K. Soil microbial biomass carbon stock and its relation with climatic and other environmental factors in forest ecosystems: A review. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2023, 43, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauhus, J.; Pare, D. Effects of tree species, stand age and soil type on soil microbial biomass and its activity in a southern boreal forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 1077–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ndaw, S.; Gama-Rodrigues, A.; Gama-Rodrigues, E.; Sales, K.; Rosado, A. Relationships between bacterial diversity, microbial biomass, and litter quality in soils under different plant covers in northern Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Can. J. Microbiol. 2009, 55, 1089–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putra, A.D.; Ardiansyah, N.; Ishaq, R.M.; Saputra, D.D.; Kurniawan, S.; Hairiah, K. Benefits of Agroforestry for Maintaining Soil Health: Using Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC) as an indicator. Proc. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2025, 1466, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gougoulias, C.; Clark, J.M.; Shaw, L.J. The role of soil microbes in the global carbon cycle: Tracking the below-ground microbial processing of plant-derived carbon for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 2362–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kästner, M.; Miltner, A.; Thiele-Bruhn, S.; Liang, C. Microbial necromass in soils—Linking microbes to soil processes and carbon turnover. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 756378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camenzind, T.; Mason-Jones, K.; Mansour, I.; Rillig, M.C.; Lehmann, J. Formation of necromass-derived soil organic carbon determined by microbial death pathways. Nat. Geosci. 2023, 16, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, N.; An, T.; Zhuang, J.; Radosevich, M.; Schaeffer, S.; Li, S.; Wang, J. High initial soil organic matter level combined with aboveground plant residues increased microbial carbon use efficiency but accelerated soil priming effect. Biogeochemistry 2022, 160, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- VM, T.; Marcos ML, F. Microbial biomass and activity in a forest soil under different tree species. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 8, 878. [Google Scholar]
- Babur, E.; Dindaroğlu, T.; Solaiman, Z.M.; Battaglia, M.L. Microbial respiration, microbial biomass and activity are highly sensitive to forest tree species and seasonal patterns in the Eastern Mediterranean Karst Ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Yuan, C.; Wu, Q.; Heděnec, P.; Zhao, Z.; Yue, K.; Ni, X.; Wu, F.; Peng, Y. Effects of transforming multiple ecosystem types to tree plantations on soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and their ratios in China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 193, 105145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Ding, B.; Zhang, Y. Impact of different forest types on soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy in the karst region of southwestern China. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1678667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, Z.; Guan, Q.; Chen, X.; Zou, P.; Gu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Niu, Y.; Meshack, A.O. Tree diversity increases soil C and N stocks of secondary forests in subtropical China. Catena 2023, 222, 106812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Six, J.; Feller, C.; Denef, K.; Ogle, S.; de Moraes Sa, J.C.; Albrecht, A. Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils-Effects of no-tillage. Agronomie 2002, 22, 755–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Six, J.; Guggenberger, G.; Paustian, K.; Haumaier, L.; Elliott, E.T.; Zech, W. Sources and composition of soil organic matter fractions between and within soil aggregates. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2001, 52, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Xu, Q.; Hu, Y. Effects of Forest Types on Soil Particulate Organic Carbon Contents and Distribution Along a Subtropical Climate Transect in China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2025, 36, 1860–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellano, M.J.; Mueller, K.E.; Olk, D.C.; Sawyer, J.E.; Six, J. Integrating plant litter quality, soil organic matter stabilization, and the carbon saturation concept. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 21, 3200–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Huang, K.; Guan, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, R.; Chen, L.; Wang, S.; Yang, Q. Retention of harvest residues promotes the accumulation of topsoil organic carbon by increasing particulate organic carbon in a Chinese fir plantation. For. Ecosyst. 2024, 11, 100229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Feng, J.; Jiang, D.; Zhu, B. Forest management causes soil carbon loss by reducing particulate organic carbon in Guangxi, Southern China. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, F.; Cui, X.; Chen, M.; Sang, Y. Forest conversion changes soil particulate organic carbon and mineral-associated organic carbon via plant inputs and microbial processes. Forests 2023, 14, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angst, G.; Mueller, K.E.; Eissenstat, D.M.; Trumbore, S.; Freeman, K.H.; Hobbie, S.E.; Chorover, J.; Oleksyn, J.; Reich, P.B.; Mueller, C.W. Soil organic carbon stability in forests: Distinct effects of tree species identity and traits. Glob. Change Biol. 2019, 25, 1529–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocci, K.S.; Lavallee, J.M.; Stewart, C.E.; Cotrufo, M.F. Soil organic carbon response to global environmental change depends on its distribution between mineral-associated and particulate organic matter: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 793, 148569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, X.; Han, X.; Faqi, W.; Zhao, F.; Ren, C.; Li, J. Change in carbon storage in soil physical fractions after afforestation of former arable land. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2016, 80, 1098–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, C.; Li, Y.; Zeng, L.; Tu, C.; Wang, X.; Ma, H.; Xiao, L.; Christie, P.; Luo, Y. Climate and mineral accretion as drivers of mineral-associated and particulate organic matter accumulation in tidal wetland soils. Glob. Change Biol. 2024, 30, e17070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Fu, C.; Hu, J.; Zeng, L.; Tu, C.; Luo, Y. Soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry and fractions in blue carbon ecosystems: Implications for carbon accumulation in allochthonous-dominated habitats. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 5913–5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Angst, G.; Mueller, K.E.; Nierop, K.G.; Simpson, M.J. Plant-or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 156, 108189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavallee, J.M.; Soong, J.L.; Cotrufo, M.F. Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Georgiou, K.; Jackson, R.B.; Vindušková, O.; Abramoff, R.Z.; Ahlström, A.; Feng, W.; Harden, J.W.; Pellegrini, A.F.; Polley, H.W.; Soong, J.L. Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Midwood, A.J.; Hannam, K.D.; Gebretsadikan, T.; Emde, D.; Jones, M.D. Storage of soil carbon as particulate and mineral associated organic matter in irrigated woody perennial crops. Geoderma 2021, 403, 115185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorodnikov, M.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Fangmeier, A.; Wiesenberg, G.L. C and N in soil organic matter density fractions under elevated atmospheric CO2: Turnover vs. stabilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddix, M.L.; Gregorich, E.G.; Helgason, B.L.; Janzen, H.; Ellert, B.H.; Cotrufo, M.F. Climate, carbon content, and soil texture control the independent formation and persistence of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter in soil. Geoderma 2020, 363, 114160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lugato, E.; Lavallee, J.M.; Haddix, M.L.; Panagos, P.; Cotrufo, M.F. Different climate sensitivity of particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter. Nat. Geosci. 2021, 14, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samson, M.-E.; Chantigny, M.H.; Vanasse, A.; Menasseri-Aubry, S.; Royer, I.; Angers, D.A. Management practices differently affect particulate and mineral-associated organic matter and their precursors in arable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 107867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.; Su, Y.; Huang, Z.; Lin, S.; Yan, J.; Wu, G.; Huang, G. Distribution, characteristics, and importance of particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon in China forest: A meta-analysis. PeerJ 2025, 13, e19189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.; Yin, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, T.; Jia, L.; Jiang, Q.; Lyu, M.; Yao, X.; Chen, G. Mineral-associated organic carbon predicts the variations in microbial biomass and specific enzyme activities in a subtropical forest. Geoderma 2023, 439, 116671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Q.; Mao, Z.; Gan, Z.; Mgelwa, A.S.; Leuzinger, S.; Hu, Y. Low-quality litter promotes soil organic carbon accumulation by inhibiting priming effects and stimulating mineral-associated organic carbon formation. J. Soils Sediments 2025, 25, 2584–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Córdova, S.C.; Olk, D.C.; Dietzel, R.N.; Mueller, K.E.; Archontouilis, S.V.; Castellano, M.J. Plant litter quality affects the accumulation rate, composition, and stability of mineral-associated soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poeplau, C.; Begill, N.; Liang, Z.; Schiedung, M. Root litter quality drives the dynamic of native mineral-associated organic carbon in a temperate agricultural soil. Plant Soil 2023, 491, 439–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dai, W.; Xiao, R.; Wei, C.; Yang, F. Plant litter traits control the accumulation of mineral-associated organic carbon by influencing its molecular composition and diversity. Soil Tillage Res. 2025, 253, 106667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, C.; Amelung, W.; Lehmann, J.; Kästner, M. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 2019, 25, 3578–3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; An, S.; Liang, C.; Liu, Y.; Kuzyakov, Y. Microbial necromass as the source of soil organic carbon in global ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 108422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, D.; Wang, Y.; Liao, C.; Men, X.; Wang, C.; Cheng, X. Soil carbon accumulation under afforestation is driven by contrasting responses of particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2024, 38, e2024GB008116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yao, X.; Chen, G.; Bai, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, D.; Deng, Q. Estimating microbial necromass contribution to mineral-associated organic matter: Comparison of stoichiometric and biomarker methods. Plant Soil 2025, 517, 887–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Hu, M.; Hui, D.; Niu, G.; Li, J.; Yao, X.; Hu, Y.; Huang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D. Plants and microorganisms both contribute to soil organic matter formation through mineral interactions: Evidence from a subtropical forest succession. Geoderma 2024, 452, 117099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Ji, C.; Fang, J.; He, H.; Zhu, B. Dynamics of microbial residues control the responses of mineral-associated soil organic carbon to N addition in two temperate forests. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 141318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lai, L.; Zhao, J.; Dou, Y. Fungal necromass carbon contributes more to POC and MAOC under different forest types of Qinling Mountains. Plant Soil 2025, 512, 603–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Li, P.; Ma, C.; Li, Y.; Lin, Q.; Hou, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhu, X.; Shen, C. Tree species and urban green space types jointly drive rhizosphere SOC fractionation and stability via microbial-enzymatic pathways. J. Plant Ecol. 2025; accepted manuscript. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Jiao, J.; Fang, Y.; Yao, L.; Wu, C. The role of mixed-species forests in post-fire soil organic carbon restoration: Mechanisms and microbial-mediated pathways. For. Ecol. Manag. 2026, 603, 123429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liu, H.; Cao, Q. FeOx-Driven Soil Aggregation Boosts MAOC Accumulation and POC Protection in Subtropical Mixed Conifer–Broadleaf Forests. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2025, 76, e70197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boča, A.; Van Miegroet, H. Can carbon fluxes explain differences in soil organic carbon storage under aspen and conifer forest overstories? Forests 2017, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Schmidt, I.K.; Zheng, H.; Heděnec, P.; Bachega, L.R.; Yue, K.; Wu, F.; Vesterdal, L. Tree species effects on topsoil carbon stock and concentration are mediated by tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability at the global scale. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 478, 118510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schleuß, P.-M.; Heitkamp, F.; Leuschner, C.; Fender, A.-C.; Jungkunst, H.F. Higher subsoil carbon storage in species-rich than species-poor temperate forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 014007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, G.; Delang, C.O.; Lu, X.; Gao, L. A meta-analysis of changes in soil organic carbon stocks after afforestation with deciduous broadleaved, sempervirent broadleaved, and conifer tree species. Ann. For. Sci. 2020, 77, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dohnalkova, A.C.; Tfaily, M.M.; Chu, R.K.; Smith, A.P.; Brislawn, C.J.; Varga, T.; Crump, A.R.; Kovarik, L.; Thomashow, L.S.; Harsh, J.B. Effects of microbial-mineral interactions on organic carbon stabilization in a ponderosa pine root zone: A micro-scale approach. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 799694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jandl, R.; Vesterdal, L.; Olsson, M.; Bens, O.; Badeck, F.; Roc, J. Carbon sequestration and forest management. CABI Rev. 2007, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Zhai, J.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, L.; Wang, G.; Ma, L.; Xue, S. Forest management practices of Pinus tabulaeformis plantations alter soil organic carbon stability by adjusting microbial characteristics on the Loess Plateau of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 766, 144209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabtai, I.A.; Hafner, B.D.; Schweizer, S.A.; Höschen, C.; Possinger, A.; Lehmann, J.; Bauerle, T. Root exudates simultaneously form and disrupt soil organo-mineral associations. Commun. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Bolscher, T.; Winnick, M.; Tfaily, M.M.; Cardon, Z.G.; Keiluweit, M. Simple plant and microbial exudates destabilize mineral-associated organic matter via multiple pathways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 3389–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, G.; Stark, J.; Waring, B.G. Mineral reactivity determines root effects on soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokol, N.W.; Bradford, M.A. Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input. Nat. Geosci. 2019, 12, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Fu, Y.; Lin, D.; Hou, M.; Li, X.; Hu, D.; Wang, Z. Transformation of soil organic matter subjected to environmental disturbance and preservation of organic matter bound to soil minerals: A review. J. Soils Sediments 2023, 23, 1485–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giuliani, L.M.; Hallett, P.D.; Loades, K.W. Effects of soil structure complexity to root growth of plants with contrasting root architecture. Soil Tillage Res. 2024, 238, 106023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rillig, M.C.; Aguilar-Trigueros, C.A.; Bergmann, J.; Verbruggen, E.; Veresoglou, S.D.; Lehmann, A. Plant root and mycorrhizal fungal traits for understanding soil aggregation. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1385–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devi, A.S. Influence of trees and associated variables on soil organic carbon: A review. J. Ecol. Environ. 2021, 45, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, F. Impact of Tree Species Mixture on Microbial Diversity and Community Structure in Soil Aggregates of Castanopsis hystrix Plantations. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; Chen, X.W.; Leung, A.K. Grass species and mycorrhizal fungi improved aggregate stability of compacted and vegetated soils. Plant Soil 2025, 511, 1081–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negi, M.; Sharma, S.; Singh, M. Plant-Driven Soil Dynamics: Exploring the Role of Roots, Fungi and Soil Traffic in Shaping the Soil Structure. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2025, 56, 2727–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Gsell, T.; Yunger, J.; Randa, L.; Peng, Y.; Carrington, M. Soil Aggregation, Aggregate Stability, and Associated Soil Organic Carbon in Huron Mountains Forests, Michigan, USA. Forests 2025, 16, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozlu, E.; Arriaga, F.J. The role of carbon stabilization and minerals on soil aggregation in different ecosystems. Catena 2021, 202, 105303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Ding, X.; Chen, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Meng, M.; Zhang, G.; Cao, Y. Mixed plantations enhance soil aggregation and carbon storage: A global meta-analysis. Catena 2025, 254, 109013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, L.; Suárez, J.C.; Rodriguez, W.; Artunduaga, K.J.; Lavelle, P. Agroforestry systems impact soil macroaggregation and enhance carbon storage in Colombian deforested Amazonia. Geoderma 2021, 384, 114810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, K.; Liao, J.; Zou, X.; Chen, H.Y.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Wanek, W.; Ni, J.; Ren, T.; Zhang, C.; Yan, Z. Forest development induces soil aggregate formation and stabilization: Implications for sequestration of soil carbon and nitrogen. Catena 2024, 246, 108363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Ulloa, M.; Veldkamp, E.; De Koning, G. Soil carbon stabilization in converted tropical pastures and forests depends on soil type. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005, 69, 1110–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Deng, L.; Gunina, A.; Alharbi, S.; Wang, K.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Shangguan, Z.; Kuzyakov, Y. Carbon stabilization pathways in soil aggregates during long-term forest succession: Implications from δ13C signatures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 180, 108988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, G.; Li, K. Tree species controls on soil carbon sequestration and carbon stability following 20 years of afforestation in a valley-type savanna. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 291, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, L.; Frew, A.; Yu, H.; Hou, E.; Wen, D. Mechanisms of soil organic carbon stabilization and its response to conversion of primary natural broadleaf forests to secondary forests and plantation forests. Catena 2024, 240, 108021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andivia, E.; Rolo, V.; Jonard, M.; Formánek, P.; Ponette, Q. Tree species identity mediates mechanisms of top soil carbon sequestration in a Norway spruce and European beech mixed forest. Ann. For. Sci. 2016, 73, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craig, M.E.; Geyer, K.M.; Beidler, K.V.; Brzostek, E.R.; Frey, S.D.; Stuart Grandy, A.; Liang, C.; Phillips, R.P. Fast-decaying plant litter enhances soil carbon in temperate forests but not through microbial physiological traits. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bai, X.; Yu, X.; Li, X.; Wang, P.; Yao, B. Enhancing soil carbon sequestration in coniferous forests through mixed planting and natural regeneration: Novel mechanisms mediated by microbial life strategies and necromass. Ind. Crops Prod. 2026, 239, 122463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zavarzina, A.; Kulikova, N.; Belov, A.; Demin, V.; Rozanova, M.; Pogozhev, P.; Danilin, I. Soil Carbon Storage in Forest and Grassland Ecosystems Along the Soil-Geographic Transect of the East European Plain: Relation to Soil Biological and Physico-Chemical Properties. Forests 2026, 17, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Tigabu, M.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Zhao, P.; Turay, M.B.; Wang, G.; Guo, F. Impacts of in-situ wildfire smoke deposition on soil carbon stoichiometry, enzymatic activities and bacterial community structure in Cunninghamia lanceolata forests. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2026, 218, 106770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, A.; Kashyap, K.; Garkoti, S.C. Influence of vegetation and soil properties on carbon stocks in Shorea robusta forests under different disturbance regimes. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 380, 124916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazgir, M.; Omidipour, R.; Heydari, M.; Zainali, N.; Hamidi, M.; Dey, D.C. Prioritizing woody species for the rehabilitation of arid lands in western Iran based on soil properties and carbon sequestration. J. Arid. Land 2020, 12, 640–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, K. Effect of Root Carbon on Microbial Abundance and Carbon Cycling in the Topsoil and Subsoil. Master’s Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canda, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Naorem, A.; Rao, M.C.S.; Shidayaichenbi, D.; Saranya, R. Beneficial Microbe-Induced Secondary Metabolites: Interactions with Plants and Soil Microbiome. In Industrial Applications of Microbial Secondary Metabolites; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2026; pp. 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starkey, R.L. Interrelations between microorganisms and plant roots in the rhizosphere. Bacteriol. Rev. 1958, 22, 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, P.; Song, H.; Liu, R.; Luo, X.; Ming, A.; Shu, W.; Shen, W. Tree species mixing effects on root exudation rate and exudate metabolome: Variations across forest stand age. Tree Physiol. 2025, 45, tpaf082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaźmierczak, M.; Błońska, E.; Kempf, M.; Zarek, M.; Lasota, J. Rhizosphere effect: Microbial and enzymatic dynamics in the rhizosphere of various shrub species. Plant Soil 2025, 511, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jimeno-Alda, J.; Navarro-Cano, J.A.; Goberna, M.; Verdú, M. Differences in nutrient content between heterospecific plant neighbours affect respiration rates of rhizosphere microbiota. Plant Soil, 2025; early access. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunn, M.; Mueller, C.W.; Chari, N.R.; Meier, I.C.; Obersteiner, S.; Phillips, R.P.; Taylor, B.; Tumber-Dávila, S.J.; Ullah, S.; Klein, T. Tree carbon allocation to root exudates: Implications for carbon budgets, soil sequestration and drought response. Tree Physiol. 2025, 45, tpaf026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panchal, P.; Preece, C.; Peñuelas, J.; Giri, J. Soil carbon sequestration by root exudates. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, L.; Dijkstra, F.A.; Wang, P.; Zhu, B.; Cheng, W. Rhizosphere priming effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics among tree species with and without intraspecific competition. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 1036–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubova, P.; Tejnecky, V.; Ash, C.; Boruvka, L.; Drabek, O. Low-molecular-mass organic acids in the forest soil environment. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2017, 14, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, W.; Kuzyakov, Y. Root effects on soil organic matter decomposition. Roots Soil Manag. Interact. Between Roots Soil 2005, 48, 119–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, S.; Yin, L.; Dijkstra, F.A.; Wang, P.; Cheng, W. Priming effect on soil carbon decomposition by root exudate surrogates: A meta-analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 178, 108955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolan, N.; Mukherjee, S.; Sharma, S.; Bolan, S.; Yuan, J.; Yang, S.; Peacock, C.; Otero-Fariña, A.; Adeleke, R.; Obi, L. Exudates of Carboxylates by Roots and Their Implications for Nutrient, Contaminant and Carbon Dynamics in Soil. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2025, 44, 399–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zambelli, A.; Nocito, F.F.; Araniti, F. Unveiling the multifaceted roles of root exudates: Chemical interactions, allelopathy, and agricultural applications. Agronomy 2025, 15, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badri, D.V.; Vivanco, J.M. Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 666–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, L.; Ataka, M.; Han, M.; Han, Y.; Gan, D.; Xu, T.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, B. Root exudation as a major competitive fine-root functional trait of 18 coexisting species in a subtropical forest. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, B.J.; Adriano, D.; Bolan, N.; Barton, C. Root exudates and microorganisms. In Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment; Elsevier-Hanley and Belfus Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastida, F.; Torres, I.F.; Hernández, T.; Bombach, P.; Richnow, H.H.; García, C. Can the labile carbon contribute to carbon immobilization in semiarid soils? Priming effects and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 57, 892–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, L.; Razavi, B.S.; Wang, W.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, S.; Wu, J.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Ge, T. Labile carbon matters more than temperature for enzyme activity in paddy soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinhold, A.; Döll, S.; Liu, M.; Schedl, A.; Pöschl, Y.; Xu, X.; Neumann, S.; van Dam, N.M. Tree species richness differentially affects the chemical composition of leaves, roots and root exudates in four subtropical tree species. J. Ecol. 2022, 110, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, W.; Tang, S.; Dengzeng, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, T.; Ma, X. Root exudates contribute to belowground ecosystem hotspots: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 937940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neumann, G.; Massonneau, A.; Langlade, N.; Dinkelaker, B.; Hengeler, C.; Römheld, V.; Martinoia, E. Physiological aspects of cluster root function and development in phosphorus-deficient white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Ann. Bot. 2000, 85, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uren, N. Types, amounts, and possible functions of compounds released into rhizosphere by soil-grown plants. In The Rhizosphere, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 35–56. [Google Scholar]
- Brunn, M.; Hafner, B.D.; Zwetsloot, M.J.; Weikl, F.; Pritsch, K.; Hikino, K.; Ruehr, N.K.; Sayer, E.J.; Bauerle, T.L. Carbon allocation to root exudates is maintained in mature temperate tree species under drought. New Phytol. 2022, 235, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, W.; Zhang, H.; Pu, Y.; Li, F. Effects of drought on carbon–nitrogen dynamics in root exudates of Qinghai spruce. Tree Physiol. 2025, 45, tpaf085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jing, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, G.; Liu, G.; Cheng, Y. The mechanism effects of root exudate on microbial community of rhizosphere soil of tree, shrub, and grass in forest ecosystem under N deposition. ISME Commun. 2023, 3, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, T.; Yu, G.-H.; Hong, W.-D.; Yuan, J.; Niu, G.-Q.; Xie, P.-H.; Sun, F.-S.; Guo, L.-D.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Shen, Q.-R. Root exudate chemistry affects soil carbon mobilization via microbial community reassembly. Fundam. Res. 2022, 2, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Negre Rodríguez, M.; Pioppi, A.; Kovács, Á.T. The role of plant host genetics in shaping the composition and functionality of rhizosphere microbiomes. Msystems 2025, 10, e0004124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrestha, R.; Huusko, K.; Sietiö, O.-M.; Schmid, B.; Cappeli, S.L.; Thitz, P.; Gerin, S.; Laine, A.-L.; Lohila, A.; Heinonsalo, J. Impacts of diverse undersown cover crops on seasonal soil microbial properties. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2025, 101, fiaf068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domeignoz-Horta, L.A.; Cappelli, S.L.; Shrestha, R.; Gerin, S.; Lohila, A.K.; Heinonsalo, J.; Nelson, D.B.; Kahmen, A.; Duan, P.; Sebag, D. Plant diversity drives positive microbial associations in the rhizosphere enhancing carbon use efficiency in agricultural soils. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ladygina, N.; Hedlund, K. Plant species influence microbial diversity and carbon allocation in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, C.; Wang, C.; Cai, A.; Zhou, Z. Global magnitude of rhizosphere effects on soil microbial communities and carbon cycling in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 856, 158961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.-Q.; Wu, Z.-J.; Zong, Y.-Y.; Wang, G.G.; Chen, F.-S.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Li, J.-J.; Fang, X.-M. Tree species mixing enhances rhizosphere soil organic carbon mineralization of conifers in subtropical plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 516, 120238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Churchland, C.; Grayston, S.J. Specificity of plant-microbe interactions in the tree mycorrhizosphere biome and consequences for soil C cycling. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priha, O.; Grayston, S.J.; Pennanen, T.; Smolander, A. Microbial activities related to C and N cycling and microbial community structure in the rhizospheres of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula pendula seedlings in an organic and mineral soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1999, 30, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grayston, S.J.; Campbell, C.D. Functional biodiversity of microbial communities in the rhizospheres of hybrid larch (Larix eurolepis) and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). Tree Physiol. 1996, 16, 1031–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X.; Ma, K.; Feng, X. Soil organic carbon sourcing variance in the rhizosphere vs. non-rhizosphere of two mycorrhizal tree species. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 176, 108884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, S.; Masto, R.; Ram, L.; Selvi, V.; Srivastava, N.; Tripathi, R.; George, J. Rhizosphere soil microbial index of tree species in a coal mining ecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 1824–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ao, G.; Qin, W.; Wang, X.; Yu, M.; Feng, J.; Han, M.; Zhu, B. Linking the rhizosphere effects of 12 woody species on soil microbial activities with soil and root nitrogen status. Rhizosphere 2023, 28, 100809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, J.; Wu, H.; Li, X.; Guo, W.; Duan, A.; Zhang, J. Response of rhizosphere bacterial communities to near-natural forest management and tree species within Chinese fir plantations. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0232822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prescott, C.E.; Grayston, S.J. Tree species influence on microbial communities in litter and soil: Current knowledge and research needs. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 309, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lladó, S.; López-Mondéjar, R.; Baldrian, P. Forest soil bacteria: Diversity, involvement in ecosystem processes, and response to global change. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017, 81, e00063-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tu, Z.; Chen, L.; Yu, X.; Zheng, Y. Rhizosphere soil enzymatic and microbial activities in bamboo forests in southeastern China. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2014, 60, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Błońska, E.; Lasota, J.; Gruba, P. Enzymatic activity and stabilization of organic matter in soil with different detritus inputs. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 63, 242–247. [Google Scholar]
- Błońska, E.; Piaszczyk, W.; Staszel, K.; Lasota, J. Enzymatic activity of soils and soil organic matter stabilization as an effect of components released from the decomposition of litter. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 157, 103723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Qu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, G.; Xue, S. Responses of soil enzyme activity and soil organic carbon stability over time after cropland abandonment in different vegetation zones of the Loess Plateau of China. Catena 2021, 196, 104812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Lianbo, S.; Wang, K.; Song, C.; Song, Y. Characteristics of ecological enzymes and nutrients mediated by soil microorganisms in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest under nitrogen deposition. Res. Sq. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.; Chen, H.; Wu, C.; Hong, T.; Xie, A. Effects of decomposition of Aleurites montana and Phyllostachys pubescences mixed foliage litter on activity of soil enzymes. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2012, 18, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Błońska, E.; Prażuch, W.; Lasota, J. Deadwood affects the soil organic matter fractions and enzyme activity of soils in altitude gradient of temperate forests. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Shao, X.; Song, Y.; Wang, X. Influence of tree species composition on leaf and soil properties and soil enzyme activity in mixed and pure Oak (Quercus variabilis) stands. Forests 2025, 16, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zeng, D. Effects of single Chinese fir and mixed leaf litters on soil chemical, microbial properties and soil enzyme activities. Plant Soil 2006, 282, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Feng, H.; McNie, P.; Liu, Q.; Xu, X.; Pan, C.; Yan, K.; Feng, L.; Goitom, E.A.; Yu, Y. Species mixing improves soil properties and enzymatic activities in Chinese fir plantations: A meta-analysis. Catena 2023, 220, 106723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Lei, P.; Xiang, W.; Ouyang, S.; Chen, L. Soil fungal communities and enzyme activities along local tree species diversity gradient in subtropical evergreen forest. Forests 2021, 12, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.-p.; Zhi, R.-c.; Jian, J.-n.; Feng, Y.-z.; Han, X.-h.; Zhang, W. Changes in soil organic C fractions and C pool stability are mediated by C-degrading enzymes in litter decomposition of Robinia pseudoacacia plantations. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 86, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chao, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Q.; Guan, X.; Yang, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Hu, B.; Liu, Z. Root functional traits determine the magnitude of the rhizosphere priming effect among eight tree species. Oikos 2023, 2023, e09638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wannenmacher, M.; Haberstroh, S.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Werner, C. Site, season and soil depth affect the composition of root exudates in three temperate tree species. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 27 April–2 May 2025; p. EGU25-10145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, H.; Heděnec, P.; Rousk, J.; Schmidt, I.K.; Peng, Y.; Vesterdal, L. Effects of common European tree species on soil microbial resource limitation, microbial communities and soil carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 172, 108754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.M.; Tsukamoto, J.; Rahman, M.M.; Yoneyama, A.; Mostafa, K.M. Lignin and its effects on litter decomposition in forest ecosystems. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 29, 540–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osono, T.; Hobara, S.; Koba, K.; Kameda, K.; Takeda, H. Immobilization of avian excreta-derived nutrients and reduced lignin decomposition in needle and twig litter in a temperate coniferous forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakrawal, A.; Lindahl, B.; Manzoni, S. Optimal lignin decomposition during litter decay. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 April 2023. Copernicus Meetings. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaštovská, E.; Cardenas-Hernandez, J.; Kuzyakov, Y. Priming effects in the rhizosphere and root detritusphere of two wet-grassland graminoids. Plant Soil 2022, 472, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, W.; Parton, W.J.; Gonzalez-Meler, M.A.; Phillips, R.; Asao, S.; McNickle, G.G.; Brzostek, E.; Jastrow, J.D. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagar, A.C.; Mushinski, R.M.; Horning, A.L.; Smemo, K.A.; Phillips, R.P.; Blackwood, C.B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal tree communities have greater soil fungal diversity and relative abundances of saprotrophs and pathogens than ectomycorrhizal tree communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e0178221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Graaff, M.-A.; Jastrow, J.D.; Gillette, S.; Johns, A.; Wullschleger, S.D. Differential priming of soil carbon driven by soil depth and root impacts on carbon availability. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 69, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, K.; Gong, L.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Sun, X. Soil Microbiome Drives Depth-Specific Priming Effects in Picea schrenkiana Forests Following Labile Carbon Input. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Augusto, L.; Boča, A. Tree functional traits, forest biomass, and tree species diversity interact with site properties to drive forest soil carbon. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H. Species Mixing Effects on Forest Productivity in the Netherlands; Wageningen University and Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Lingeri, P.C.; Piazza, M.V.; Caccia, F.D. Forest plantation diversification with Leguminosae tree species: Consequences on litter decomposition and nutrient recycling. Austral Ecol. 2023, 48, 1888–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, N.; Bai, Y.; Zhou, Y. Tree species mixtures can improve the water storage of the litter–soil continuum in subtropical coniferous plantations in China. Forests 2023, 14, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, S.; Chen, X.; Piton, G.; Terrer, C.; Zhou, Z.; De Deyn, G.B.; Bertrand, I.; Rasse, D.; Chen, J.; Navarro-Cano, J.A. The complementarity hypothesis reversed: Root trait similarity in species mixtures promotes soil organic carbon in agroecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2025, 203, 109736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brassard, B.W.; Chen, H.Y.; Cavard, X.; Laganière, J.; Reich, P.B.; Bergeron, Y.; Pare, D.; Yuan, Z. Tree species diversity increases fine root productivity through increased soil volume filling. J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Chen, H.Y. Positive species mixture effects on fine root turnover and mortality in natural boreal forests. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 121, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Z.; Elsgaard, L.; Nicolaisen, M.H.; Lyhne-Kjærbye, A.; Olesen, J.E. Carbon mineralization and microbial activity in agricultural topsoil and subsoil as regulated by root nitrogen and recalcitrant carbon concentrations. Plant Soil 2018, 433, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, K.; Lu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, Q.; Shen, Z.; Tong, Z.; Zhang, J. Depth-dependent effects of forest diversification on soil functionality and microbial community characteristics in subtropical forests. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 289, 127931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germon, A.; Guerrini, I.A.; Bordron, B.; Bouillet, J.-P.; Nouvellon, Y.; de Moraes Gonçalves, J.L.; Jourdan, C.; Paula, R.R.; Laclau, J.-P. Consequences of mixing Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis trees on soil exploration by fine-roots down to a depth of 17 m. Plant Soil 2018, 424, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warner, E.; Cook-Patton, S.; Lewis, O.; Brown, N.; Koricheva, J.; Eisenhauer, N.; Ferlian, O.; Gravel, D.; Hall, J.; Jactel, H. Young mixed planted forests store more carbon than monocultures—A meta-analysis. Front. For. Glob. Change 2023, 6, 1226514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Q.; Gong, L. Compared with pure forest, mixed forest alters microbial diversity and increases the complexity of interdomain networks in arid areas. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0264223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y. Effects of single and mixed species forest ecosystems on diversity and function of soil microbial community in subtropical China. J. Soils Sediments 2012, 12, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cesarz, S.; Craven, D.; Auge, H.; Bruelheide, H.; Castagneyrol, B.; Gutknecht, J.; Hector, A.; Jactel, H.; Koricheva, J.; Messier, C. Tree diversity effects on soil microbial biomass and respiration are context dependent across forest diversity experiments. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2022, 31, 872–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, F.; Cao, Q.; Bai, Y. Mixing of pine and arbuscular mycorrhizal tree species changed soil organic carbon storage by affecting soil microbial characteristics. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 930, 172630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singavarapu, B.; Du, J.; Beugnon, R.; Cesarz, S.; Eisenhauer, N.; Xue, K.; Wang, Y.; Bruelheide, H.; Wubet, T. Functional potential of soil microbial communities and their subcommunities varies with tree mycorrhizal type and tree diversity. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0457822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Guan, F.; Fan, S.; Zhang, X. Response of soil microbial community structure and diversity to mixed proportions and mixed tree species in bamboo–broad-leaved mixed forests. Forests 2024, 15, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Condron, L.; Stark, C.; O’Callaghan, M.; Clinton, P.; Huang, Z. The role of microbial communities in the formation and decomposition of soil organic matter. In Soil Microbiology and Sustainable Crop Production; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 81–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillespie, L.M.; Hättenschwiler, S.; Milcu, A.; Wambsganss, J.; Shihan, A.; Fromin, N. Tree species mixing affects soil microbial functioning indirectly via root and litter traits and soil parameters in European forests. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35, 2190–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Huang, Y.; Hungate, B.A.; Manzoni, S.; Frey, S.D.; Schmidt, M.W.; Reichstein, M.; Carvalhais, N.; Ciais, P.; Jiang, L. Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage. Nature 2023, 618, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatoon, H.; Solanki, P.; Narayan, M.; Tewari, L.; Rai, J.; Hina Khatoon, C. Role of microbes in organic carbon decomposition and maintenance of soil ecosystem. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2017, 5, 1648–1656. [Google Scholar]
- Jílková, V.; Devetter, M.; Al Haj Ishak Al Ali, R.; Angel, R.; Angst, G.; Jandová, K.; Libra, M.; Starý, J. Tree species and soil depth affect microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter in temperate forest soils, surpassing the impact of microbial and faunal community composition. Funct. Ecol. 2025, 39, 2219–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, H.; Niu, L.; Wu, Q.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Liang, C.; Xu, Q.; Fuhrmann, J.J.; Shen, Y. Bamboo forest expansion increases soil organic carbon through its effect on soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community and abundance. Plant Soil 2017, 420, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortiz, C.; Fernández-Alonso, M.J.; Kitzler, B.; Díaz-Pinés, E.; Saiz, G.; Rubio, A.; Benito, M. Variations in soil aggregation, microbial community structure and soil organic matter cycling associated to long-term afforestation and woody encroachment in a Mediterranean alpine ecotone. Geoderma 2022, 405, 115450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anthony, M.A.; Tedersoo, L.; De Vos, B.; Croisé, L.; Meesenburg, H.; Wagner, M.; Andreae, H.; Jacob, F.; Lech, P.; Kowalska, A. Fungal community composition predicts forest carbon storage at a continental scale. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Yuan, C.; He, S.; Chen, J.; Luo, J.; Ding, F.; Yan, G. Effects of Soil Microorganisms on Carbon Sequestration under Different Mixed Modification Models in Pinus massoniana L. Plantation. Forests 2024, 15, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Bai, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y.; Hu, S.; Jonathan, M.A.; Dong, L.; Yu, X. Soil microbial trait-based strategies drive the storage and stability of the soil carbon pool in Robinia pseudoacacia plantations. Catena 2023, 222, 106894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, H.; Li, S.; He, H.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Huang, Q.; Cai, P.; Gao, C.-H. Stronger linkage of diversity-carbon decomposition for rare rather than abundant bacteria in woodland soils. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1115300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Binkley, D.; Stape, J.L.; Ryan, M.G. Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 193, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammer, C. Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beugnon, R.; Le Guyader, N.; Milcu, A.; Lenoir, J.; Puissant, J.; Morin, X.; Hättenschwiler, S. Microclimate modulation: An overlooked mechanism influencing the impact of plant diversity on ecosystem functioning. Glob. Change Biol. 2024, 30, e17214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fanin, N.; Maxwell, T.L.; Altinalmazis-Kondylis, A.; Bon, L.; Meredieu, C.; Jactel, H.; Bakker, M.R.; Augusto, L. Effects of mixing tree species and water availability on soil organic carbon stocks are depth dependent in a temperate podzol. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2022, 73, e13133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, T.S. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Mixed-Species Agroforestry Systems under Semi-Arid Conditions. Natl. J. For. Sustain. Clim. Change 2025, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Kang, L.; Li, M.; Zhang, G.; Cao, Y. Beyond monocultures: Optimizing soil carbon sequestration with diverse planting strategies on the Loess Plateau. Catena 2024, 246, 108447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Roland, B.; Adhikari, K.; Zhuang, Q.; Jin, X.; Han, C.; Qian, F. Spatial-temporal variations and driving factors of soil organic carbon in forest ecosystems of Northeast China. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Ajloon, F.H.; Wang, X.; Malghani, S.; Yu, S.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, W. Temporal effects of thinning on soil organic carbon and carbon cycling-related enzyme activities in oak-pine mixed forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 545, 121293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Deng, Q.; Kang, H. Long-term continuity of mixed-species broadleaves could reach a synergy between timber production and soil carbon sequestration in subtropical China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 440, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Kneeshaw, D.; Peng, C.; Wu, Y.; Feng, L.; Qu, X.; Wang, W.; Pan, C.; Feng, H. Positive effects of species mixing on biodiversity of understory plant communities and soil health in forest plantations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2418090122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ureña-Lara, C.; Pérez-Corona, M.E.; Delgado, J.A.; de las Heras, P.; Jiménez, M.D.; Andivia, E. Tree species identity rather than species mixing modulates soil organic carbon stocks and respiration in Mediterranean mountain forests. Plant Soil, 2025; early access. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gautam, K.; Kumar, N.; Ram, A.; Dev, I.; Choudhury, B.U.; Singh, N.R.; Handa, A.K.; Yadav, A.; Anuragi, H.; Uthappa, A. Root architecture and carbon sequestration potential of fast-growing agroforestry tree species in semi-arid Central India. Front. Agron. 2025, 7, 1597122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasić, F.; Belanović-Simić, S.; Beloica, J.; Čavlović, D.; Kaňa, J.; Paul, C.; Donmez, C.; Jovanović, N.; Miljković, P. Soil Organic Carbon Stock (SOCS) in Eutrophic and Saline Ramsar Wetlands in Serbia. Water 2025, 18, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Chen, H.Y.; Chen, X.; Huang, Z. Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Landuyt, D.; Verheyen, K.; De Frenne, P. Tree species mixing can amplify microclimate offsets in young forest plantations. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022, 59, 1428–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mina, M.; Messier, C.; Duveneck, M.J.; Fortin, M.J.; Aquilué, N. Managing for the unexpected: Building resilient forest landscapes to cope with global change. Glob. Change Biol. 2022, 28, 4323–4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bai, Y.-H.; Tang, Z. Enhanced effects of species richness on resistance and resilience of global tree growth to prolonged drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2410467121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haberstroh, S.; Werner, C. The role of species interactions for forest resilience to drought. Plant Biol. 2022, 24, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osuri, A.M.; Gopal, A.; Raman, T.S.; DeFries, R.; Cook-Patton, S.C.; Naeem, S. Greater stability of carbon capture in species-rich natural forests compared to species-poor plantations. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 034011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Tree Species/Functional Group | SOC and Its Fraction Content | Impacted Components | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed forests | MAOC ↑, and POC ↑ (relative to younger forests or monocultures) | forest age ↑, MAOC/SOC ↓, but soil depth ↑, MAOC ↑ (MAOC ↑ in deeper soils). | [173] |
| Pinus tabuliformis | microbial necromass C (MNC)/MAOC ↓ (11.9%) (relative to Quercus aliena at 20–40 cm depth) | total phosphorus, soil moisture, and texture, and cellulose content in litter. | [185] |
| Quercus aliena | MNC/MAOC ↑ (21.2%) (relative to Pinus tabuliformis at 20–40 cm depth) | ||
| Primary mixed broadleaved–Korean pine forest → secondary broadleaved forest | free POC 20.3% ↓ and aggregate-occluded POC 57.2% ↑ (relative to primary forest before conversion) | litter and superior fine root quality ↑, C/N ratio ↓, SOC, and microbial biomass content ↑ | [159] |
| Primary mixed broadleaved–Korean pine forest → coniferous plantation | Free POC 49.1% ↑, while aggregate-occluded POC 42.4% ↓ and MAOC 9.0% ↓ (relative to primary forest before conversion) | litter and fine root quantity and quality ↓, SOC ↓, microbial biomass ↓, and microbial residue C ↓ | |
| Populus tomentosa (deciduous broadleaf) | SOC ↑; MAOC ↑; MAOC/SOC ↑ (relative to Pinus tabuliformis in the same urban green space) | Fungal-dominated microbial communities ↑, C/P ↓, hydrolytic enzyme activities ↑, SOC accumulation, and MAOC ↑ | [186] |
| Pinus tabuliformis (evergreen conifer) | SOC ↓ or NC; MAOC/SOC ↑ (site-dependent) (relative to Populus tomentosa in the same urban green space) | oxidative enzyme activity ↑, organic matter oxidation ↑, and SOC ↓ | |
| Quercus wutaishanica | SOC:NC; POC:NC; MAOC:NC (relative to the same forest before N addition) | microbial communities: NC to N addition, SOC fraction dynamics: NC | [184] |
| Betula platyphylla | SOC:NC; POC:NC; MAOC ↑ (relative to the same forest before N addition and relative to Quercus wutaishanica) | Microbial residues (amino sugars) ↑, microbial biomass, and enzymes: NC | |
| mixed-species plantations (five-species mixtures) | SOC ↑, MAOC ↑ (76.55%) (relative to reference secondary forest and relative to monoculture and two-species mixture plantations) | Diverse necromass inputs, organo-mineral interactions ↑, available N ↑, bacterial + fungal necromass ↑ | [187] |
| Pure coniferous plantation → coniferous–broadleaf mixed forest | POC ↑ (80.2%–169.8%) (relative to pure coniferous plantation before conversion) | physically protected by macroaggregates and Fe oxides ↑ | [188] |
| MAOC ↑ (41.1%–137.3%) (relative to pure coniferous plantation before conversion) | microaggregate formation ↑ and long-term SOC stabilization ↑ | ||
| Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) | Stable SOC ↑ (relative to conifers in the same site) | Root–microbe–soil (rhizosphere) interactions | [189] |
| Conifers | Labile SOC ↑ (relative to Populus tremuloides in the same site) | Root detritus inputs | |
| Conifers | SOC stock 44% ↑ (relative to broadleaved species) | litter C ↑ | [190] |
| Broadleaved | SOC 44% ↓ (relative to conifers) | litter C ↑ | |
| AM-associated | SOC stock 39% ↓ (relative to ECM-associated species) | litter decomposition ↑ | |
| ECM-associated | SOC stock 39% ↑ (relative to AM-associated species) | litter decomposition ↓ | |
| Mixed broadleaved forests (3–5 species) | MAOC ↑, SOC pools ↑ (relative to monospecific forests) | Tree species diversity and fine root biomass and turnover ↑ | [191] |
| Juniperus excelsa (Juniper), Cedrus libani (Cedar), Abies cilicica (Fir) | Total SOC ↑, PC ↑, C Management Index (CMI) ↑ (mostly under Juniper, Cedar, Fir relative to oak and shrubby land) | Species-specific rhizosphere effects | [97] |
| Quercus L. (Oak) | Labile SOC ↑ (relative to Juniper, Cedar, Fir, and shrubby land) | ||
| Pinus brutia | SOC 22% ↑ AC ↑, PC ↑, SOC lability ↓ (relative to Quercus coccifera) | Species-specific rhizosphere effects | [5] |
| Quercus coccifera | AC ↑, PC ↑, SOC lability NC (relative to deforested shrubby land) | ||
| Deforested shrubby land | SOC ↓-AC ↓, PC ↓, SOC lability ↑ (relative to both Pinus brutia and Quercus coccifera forests) | SOC ↓, PC:AC ↓ | |
| Deciduous broadleaved | Stable SOC stock ↑ (relative to pre-afforestation or shrubby land) | Consistent SOC ↑ after afforestation; strong performance on grasslands | [192] |
| Sempervirent broadleaved | SOC stock ↓ (young trees) (relative to stand age) | Initial SOC ↓ following afforestation | |
| SOC stock ↑ (mature trees) (relative to stand age) | SOC ↑ (~20 years after afforestation) | ||
| Sempervirent conifer | SOC stocks ↓ (low rate) (relative to pre-afforestation or baseline soil) | Lowest SOC stock change among species groups |
| Tree Species/Functional Group | SOC Stabilization | Affected Components | Location | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary forest (Inceptisols) | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to pasture) | Sorption of organic C to clay minerals ↑ | Ecuador | [212] |
| Secondary forest (Andisols) | SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to pasture) | Formation of metal–humus complexes and allophane | ||
| Early succession (Lespedeza bicolor) | SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to late succession, Quercus liaotungensis) | Macroaggregate formation ↑; C transfer ↑ (rapid) | China | [213] |
| Late succession (Quercus liaotungensis) | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to early succession, Lespedeza bicolor) | C occlusion in silt and clay within aggregates (root–microbe-mediated) | ||
| Leucaena leucocephala (most effective afforested species, 20 years) | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to other afforested species) | Physical protection in heavy fraction (<0.25 mm) and moderate biochemical recalcitrant C | China | [214] |
| Primary natural broadleaf → secondary and plantation forests | SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to primary natural broadleaf forests) | Macroaggregate-associated SOC ↓ + tree biomass (litter and root) ↓ and Fe/Al oxide concentration ↓ | China | [215] |
| Norway spruce | SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to mixed forest) | Litterfall accumulation in the forest floor | Czech Republic | [216] |
| European beech | SOC stabilization ↑ (moderate) (relative to Norway spruce) | Root-derived C inputs to mineral soil | ||
| Mixed forest (Norway spruce + European beech) | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to monocultures of Norway spruce and European beech) | Litterfall and root turnover complementarity (root-driven stabilization) | ||
| Temperate forest | SOC stabilization ↓ (high microbial activity reduces MAOC) | Litter (high-quality) ↑ + microbial growth ↑, SOC decomposition rate ↑ | United States | [217] |
| Pinus brutia | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to non-forest soils in the region) | Protection of SOC by micro-aggregate (<2 mm) | Türkiye | [1] |
| Quercus coccifera | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to non-forest soils in the region) | High protection of SOC by fine-aggregates (0.25–0.05 mm) | ||
| Pinus tabulaeformis and Forsythia suspensa | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to P. tabulaeformis monoculture) | Bacterial necromass-driven MAOC ↑ | China | [218] |
| Pinus tabulaeformis and Quercus wutaishanica | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to P. tabulaeformis monoculture) | Fungal necromass-driven POC ↑ | ||
| Forest (mature) | SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to grassland) | Microbial activity ↑; Ca-mediated stabilization ↓ | Russia | [219] |
| Grassland (climax) | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to forest) | Organo-mineral interactions ↑; Ca-bound humic acids ↑ | ||
| Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations | SOC stabilization: NC (relative to untreated control) | Microbial–enzyme interactions in litter and soil; smoke effects on C cycling | China | [220] |
| Shorea robusta (no/low disturbance (ND/LD)) | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to HD forest) | litterfall and root-derived C inputs ↑ and soil nutrients ↑ | India | [221] |
| Shorea robusta (moderate disturbance (MD)) | SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to HD forest) | biomass ↑ > other disturbance regimes | ||
| Shorea robusta (highly disturbed (HD)) | SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to ND/LD and MD forest) | soil nutrients ↓ and erosion risk ↑ | ||
| Populus euphratica (native) (1), Eucalyptus camaldulensis (introduced) (2), Prosopis juliflora (introduced) (3), Tamarix ramosissima (native) (4), open area (no vegetation) (5) | SOC stabilization ↑ (High to very low) in1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 5 | SOM ↑, SOC sequestration↑, bulk density ↓ (in 5 ↑) SOC sequestration in 1 (9.08 t ha−1) > 2 (8.37 t ha−1) > 3 (5.20 t ha−1) > 4 (2.93 t ha−1) > 5 (1.33 t ha−1) | Iran | [222] |
| Alnus glutinosa (1), Carpinus betulus- Acer velutinum (2), Populus deltoides (3), Cupressus sempervirens, var. horizontalis (4), Degraded land (5) | SOC stabilization ↑ (High to very low) in 1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 5 | Litter quality ↑, soil N, P, K, SOC ↑, microbial biomass ↑, enzyme activity ↑ In contrast to non-native species and poor degraded land, Alnus glutinosa showed the highest SOC stabilization↑ due to N fixation ↑ and litter decomposition rate ↑, and soil recovery after 25 years | Iran | [223] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Razzaghi, S. The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics. Forests 2026, 17, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319
Razzaghi S. The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics. Forests. 2026; 17(3):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319
Chicago/Turabian StyleRazzaghi, Somayyeh. 2026. "The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics" Forests 17, no. 3: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319
APA StyleRazzaghi, S. (2026). The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics. Forests, 17(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319

