Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Environmental and Physiological Controls on Yield and Quality of Epimedium pubescens Through a Shading Gradient Experiment in Agroforestry Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Cultural Diversity Contributions of Conserving Old Trees in Human Settlements: Jingxi Case, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Long-Term Soil Respiration Variability in a Temperate Deciduous Broadleaf Forest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics

by
Somayyeh Razzaghi
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Erciyes University, Melikgazi, 38030 Kayseri, Türkiye
Forests 2026, 17(3), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319
Submission received: 15 January 2026 / Revised: 15 February 2026 / Accepted: 1 March 2026 / Published: 4 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Forests in Carbon Cycles, Sequestration, and Storage)

Abstract

The role of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in forest carbon (C) balance has been widely recognized. The processes that mediate the relationships between forest tree species composition and the formation, turnover, and stabilization of SOC are not sufficiently understood. This paper aimed to compile the state of knowledge on the involvement of tree species composition in the regulation of SOC dynamics through litter quality, root properties, root exudates, microbial-mediated processes, and soil mineral interactions. A greater emphasis is given to the role of the SOC pool subdivision into active (labile) and passive (non-labile) fractions. These fractions turn over at a significantly different rate and have also been proven to be considerably different in terms of long-term stability. The properties of the trees and soil in the rhizosphere influence the rate of short-term and chemical conversion of plant material into the persistent or passive fraction of soil C through the mediating process of microorganisms. Evidence confirmed that the functional interactions between the mix of tree species increase the rate of SOC stabilization through an increase in the rate of active to passive fraction transition. This synthesis presents a trait-based approach for considering and addressing the dynamics of SOC in the environment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The soil organic carbon (SOC) pool can be a major contributor to the carbon (C) budget of a forest ecosystem, surpassing the amount of C in the above-ground biomass pool [1]. The forest soil is a major C pool because this soil retains decomposed organic material that originates from litter fall and root turnover [2,3,4]. This SOC pool exerts a major influence on ecosystem C stocks and can determine whether a forest functions as a C sink or a C source [5].
SOC also plays a crucial role in regulating C cycle processes in forested ecosystems [6,7]. One of the largest C fluxes in forest ecosystems is soil respiration, driven by organic matter decomposition and root and microbial metabolic activities [8,9,10]. Additionally, SOC supports the long-term maintenance of forests and their role in sequestering C from the atmosphere [11]. While aboveground biomass is erratic in terms of its retention due to aspects such as fire, wind, and harvest, SOC is often stored in forests for many years and even centuries. This is precisely what is needed to ensure that forests remain vital in sequestering C [12].
Tree species are important factors influencing the formation of SOC, since they significantly tend to control the input of organic matter into the soil [13,14]. Variations among tree species in litter production rates, litter chemistry, root biomass, and root exudation can regulate both the quantity of carbon inputs to the soil and the rate of carbon decomposition. In particular, species producing litter rich in lignin and low in nutrient concentrations tend to slow decomposition rates due to reduced litter quality and limited microbial accessibility [15,16,17]. Furthermore, tree species can affect soil microbial populations and biogeochemical cycling, which are essential for maintaining soil C [18]. The microorganisms present in tree roots, specifically the mycorrhizal fungi in the soil beneath them, vary among different tree types [19]. They can influence C cycling in the soil, determining whether the carbon will be respired or enter the soil’s C pools [20]. Moreover, tree species also influence soil physical and chemical properties, which in turn regulate the stability of SOC [21]. Tree species, therefore, can be considered an important, although less recognized, factor in the stability of SOC in forests [22].
SOC can be considered a heterogeneous reservoir, consisting of different fractions that can be distinguished based on their chemical compositions, turnover rates, and storage [23]. The soil stabilization factors influence the long-term durability of SOC in soil [24]. Physical protection in soil aggregates can prevent microbial interactions with organic matter [25,26,27], while chemical protection is achieved through the interactions between organic matter and soil minerals [28]. Biologically mediated processes, for instance, microbial degradation of plant organic matter into stable organic compounds, also influence the formation of SOC [29]. The relative importance of these stabilization processes varies depending on the soil type, climate, and vegetation [30,31]. In forest soils with high clay content or abundant reactive mineral surfaces, C stabilization is enhanced through organo-mineral associations, promoting the formation and persistence of mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) [28]. Knowledge of the processes involved in the formation and protection of SOC fractions is essential for predicting SOC reactions [32]. Despite intensive research, significant uncertainties persist in understanding SOC processes in forest ecosystems [12,33,34]. While numerous studies have reported differences in C storage among tree species, these differences are often context-dependent and influenced by environmental and edaphic conditions. The mechanistic basis underlying such differences and their linkage to species-specific functional traits remains insufficiently synthesized. A critical knowledge gap exists in the limited integration of tree species traits with SOC stabilization pathways. Rather than a lack of evidence that tree species influence SOC, the main limitation lies in explaining how trait-driven processes regulate SOC formation and persistence. Additionally, the sensitivity of different SOC fractions and processes involved in their stabilization to changes associated with tree species in the forest remains unclear. Furthermore, the variability in SOC fractionation and depth and the lack of a standard for presenting the results make it difficult to synthesize the information obtained.
The review study focused on the short- and long-term dynamics of SOC in the rhizosphere, highlighting gaps in understanding SOC sequestration and the sensitivity of its fractions to different tree species, and integrating current knowledge of SOC, specifically regarding processes within the rhizosphere, where tree species have a ‘hidden’ influence.

2. Tree Species as Drivers of C Inputs to Soil

2.1. Litter Production

Litterfall constitutes an important component of net primary production, as a portion of the biomass produced through photosynthesis is ultimately returned to the soil. Through this process, C and nutrients are transferred from vegetation to the soil system [35,36,37]. Several factors directly impact litter production among tree species. One of these factors is leaf area index (LAI) [38]. Chen and Black [39] defined this parameter as the total one-sided leaf area per unit of terrestrial surface area and indicated that the forest LAI represents half of the total leaf area per unit horizontal ground area. This parameter is crucial for determining canopy structures [40,41]. Therefore, forest tree species with a higher LAI have a significant impact on C dynamics and can sequestrate and store more C in the soil [42]. The biomass turnover rate can also vary among tree species [43]. Therefore, a higher biomass turnover rate results in higher litter input and surface C content [44]. Furthermore, nutrient resorption efficiency, which varies among tree species, can impact the C cycle and C content of the litter [45,46]. The C content of the litter of tree species with higher nutrient resorption efficiency is more than that of the lower ones [47]. Evergreen and deciduous species exhibit different litter compositions and patterns, varying in both quantity and seasonality [48,49,50]. These differences alter microbial activity [51], the rate of decomposition [52], and the timing of C addition to pools of organic matter in the soil [53]. The mixed litter fall in the forest can also be considered a significant parameter for improving soil fertility and enhancing the SOC pool. In this regard, Polyakova and Billor [54] noted that mixed pine and deciduous litter decomposed more rapidly and exhibited higher nutrient concentrations and lower C:N ratios than pure pine litter, thereby enhancing nutrient circulation and SOC dynamics, benefiting ecosystem functioning in pine forests.

2.2. Litter Quality

The lignin and polyphenols, as well as the C:N ratio in litter, are factors that significantly contribute to litter quality, which varies according to tree species [55,56,57,58]. For example, deciduous species typically produce litter with lower lignin and polyphenol concentrations and more favorable C:N ratios compared with conifers, resulting in faster decomposition and greater microbial activity [59,60]. These chemical variations in the litter result in different forms of litter-derived C in the soil [61]. Cotrufo et al. [62] reported that elevated atmospheric CO2 (600 ppm) altered litter quality by decreasing N content and increasing lignin concentrations and C:N and lignin: N ratios, which slowed decomposition and is expected to enhance soil C storage. Furthermore, Thirunavukkarasu [63] highlighted that microbial community composition and lignin chemical composition, rather than lignin content alone, regulate early-stage decomposition and contribute to soil organic matter formation, highlighting the mechanistic interplay between microbial activity and litter chemistry in soil C dynamics.
Decomposable litter supports microbial life in the soil and acts as a source for the short-term C pool in the soil C budget [64]. Fanin and Bertrand [65] demonstrated that litter quality significantly influences C mineralization rates more than soil type and microbial community composition. The resistant components of the litter would persist in the soil for a long time and act as an indirect source for the stable C pool in the soil [66,67]. Consequently, the species-specific chemistry of litter is essential in determining the rates of decomposition, C mineralization, and stabilization.

2.3. Root System Characteristics

The architecture of the root system varies significantly among tree species, which in turn affects the levels of C deposited in the soil profile [68,69]. Tree species with a deep-rooted vegetation system can deposit C into the sub-soil layers, resulting in increased organic matter deposits in the soil at a slower rate [70]. Species with shallow and fine root systems deposit C primarily in the upper soil layers, where fine root biomass is often concentrated (e.g., 10–20 cm depth) and strongly associated with higher SOC levels in the 0–30 cm soil profile; in these layers, high bacterial activity and species-specific differences in root decomposition regulated by root chemical traits such as the C:N ratio and soil depth (e.g., Alnus glutinosa, Pinus sylvestris, and Picea orientalis) further influence C turnover and sequestration [71,72,73]. Jackson et al. [74] also indicated that a substantial fraction of the C sequestered by photosynthesis in forests is allocated to the development of fine roots (diameter < 2 mm). Fine root turnover (FRT) is another key contributor to belowground organic C inputs. Those plant species with higher rates of fine root production (FRP) and turnover contribute significantly to organic C inputs into the soil through root death [75]. In addition, certain root morphological properties, such as specific root length and root diameter, mediate decomposability, colonization, and soil mineral interactions, thereby controlling the turnover of root organic C [76,77,78].

2.4. Mycorrhizal Associations (AM vs. ECM Species)

Plant species are characterized by associations with types of mycorrhizae, mostly arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi, depending on the species [20,79]. According to Smith and Read [80] AM fungi penetrate root cortical cells, with their colonization rates influenced by the volume of available root cortex. Conversely, ECM fungi expand externally, creating a hyphal network that envelops the root epidermal cells. As mentioned above, tree species may associate with different mycorrhizal types (e.g., AM or ECM). In general, AM tree species primarily utilize inorganic nutrient availability and allocate limited C resources for fungal associations, and require less C compared to host trees [81,82]. These fungi enable tree species to allocate more C to the root rather than the fungal tissue [83].
ECM tree species allocate more C resources underground through organic nutrients from enzymatic degradation, impacting soil C cycling and stabilization. This ECM-driven approach leads to slower litter decay and increased organic matter accumulation due to competition with free-living decomposers [84,85]. By contrast, associations with soil microbes tend to be related to enhanced soil nutrient cycling [86] and microbial turnover, which can be associated with soil C cycling and stabilization [87]. Overall, the ECM leads to suppressing litter decay and helps form a more stable soil organic matter (SOM); therefore, it results in an increased soil C pool [88,89]. Therefore, these fungi can increase soil C:N in the SOM [90]. In contrast, AM with higher rates of nutrient cycling [91] and microbial activity results in higher C cycling within the system [92] but lower C retention in the soil. In this regard, Yin et al. [90], indicated that AM-treated trees promoted significantly more rhizosphere priming and enhanced soil C breakdown compared to ECM-treated trees. Thus, it can be reported that ECM-associated trees probably enhance soil carbon retention more effectively than AM-associated trees, due to reduced microbial enzyme expenditure on carbon breakdown. Soudzilovskaia et al. [93] also highlighted that AM fungi predominantly influence the C pool in living plant biomass, while ECM fungi primarily impact the soil carbon stock directly.
According to Liu et al. [94] ECM-treated soils contained younger C in the upper layer of the soil but older C in the deeper layer of the soil compared to AM-treated soils. As expected, Carteron et al. [95] reported that deciduous forest ECM stands contained more soil C (up to 20 cm depth) compared to adjacent AM-dominated stands. However, in the deeper horizons of the ECM, the organic matter was decomposed more slowly and of lower quality.

3. Control of SOC Fractions by Tree Species

Fractionation serves as an effective method for monitoring alterations in various labile, recalcitrant, and total soil C stocks. Consequently, it helps local authorities determine appropriate management strategies tailored to specific soil types, taking into account both economic productivity and soil quality [96]. The Species of the tree also affects not only the total stock of SOC but also its distribution based on various functional C components or fractions [97]. The different functional SOC components vary according to their availability to microorganisms [98], soil residence times [99], and their role in C storage [23]. The properties of various tree species govern their role in the formation, conversion, and stability of the C fraction [5].
SOC can be categorized into labile (active), intermediate, and passive (stable) fractions based on turnover time and stabilizing mechanisms [100]. The labile or active C (AC) pool portion of SOC is defined by its hot water-soluble C (HWSC), or dissolved organic C (DOC), permanganate-oxidizable C (POXC), and microbial biomass C (MBC) [97,101,102].
The bridge of AC and PC often represents the intermediate SOC pool (IC); therefore, this fraction can be considered a transitional C fraction with both labile and stable characteristics [103,104]. Thus, particulate organic C (POC) can be regarded as the IC fraction. The passive SOC (PC) pool, which facilitates long-term soil C sequestration, primarily consists of mineral-associated organic C (MAOC), stabilized by robust interactions with soil minerals such as clays and metal oxides (Figure 1) [105,106,107]. The stabilization of SOC results from microbial degradation of the labile C pool, followed by its transfer to mineral-associated fractions.

3.1. Labile SOC Pools

3.1.1. Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC)

DOC results from the leaching of soluble components from litter and roots as exudates and provides energy for microbial life in the soil, and helps the C and nutrient cycle in the forest [108,109,110,111]. Tan et al. [112] highlighted the essential role of forests to sequester C by tree species and soil in the form of DOC, which can be conveyed via streams. This fraction of the SOC can be mixed by minerals not only in the soil, but also in water, and can be transported to the deep ocean or can be changed to CO2 by microbial activity in water and affect the global C cycle and climate change [113,114]. Tree species differ in their volumetric production of DOC, depending on the solubility of their litter and the activity of their roots [115]. According to Uselman et al. [116] root litter serves as a significant DOC in forests. Presumably, it plays a crucial role in the accumulation of SOM and the stabilization of C during the development of forest ecosystems. Wölfelschneider et al. [117] also indicated that forests, especially mangrove forests, significantly facilitate the generation and export of DOC from soil by leaching and runoff to aquatic ecosystems. As indicated above, DOC plays a crucial role in the vertical transport of C within the soil profile [118]. This SOC fraction also serves as an essential interface between plant inputs and microbiological processing, and the microbial activity, along with plant species, that significantly contributes to DOC creation [119,120]. The interactions between DOC and soil minerals also control the further processing of this C as mineralized, immobilized, or stabilized C [121]. In this line, Kalbitz et al. [122] reported that the stability of DOC by mineral association is a crucial mechanism for long-term soil C sequestration; yet, its effectiveness is markedly affected by hydrological variability and biological processes in natural soils. Fröberg et al. [123] reported that the soil under spruce and pine had a higher input of DOC to mineral soil compared to birch. Hansson et al. [124] mentioned that the variations in DOC flux were mainly ascribed to reduced forest floor C reserves in birch. Likewise, DOC inputs to the upper and mineral forest soil were determined to be greatest under Norway spruce and beech [125]. The composition of the predominant forest plant species significantly influences the quality of DOC and its decomposition due to variations in litter chemistry and interspecies interactions that impact C cycling in forests [126].

3.1.2. Permanganate-Oxidizable Carbon (POXC)

POXC serves as a prevalent indicator of the labile organic C reservoir in soils and can be rapidly oxidized by potassium permanganate [127]. POXC is closely associated with fresh plant material, microbial biomass, and a labile fraction of SOC, hence influencing the rapid turnover of organic C [100,128,129]. POXC’s fast reaction to environmental alterations renders it a prevalent indicator for assessing C dynamics, soil health, and soil quality indicator [130], and vulnerability to shifts in forest vegetation [5]. Forest tree species significantly influence POXC through differing litter inputs, litter quality, and root C contributions. Pine litter contains a higher C:N ratio and persists in decomposition [131]. Tree species that generate litter with a low C:N ratio, minimal lignin content, and elevated nutrient concentrations are likely to sustain a substantial POXC pool. Oliveira et al. [132] stated that under loblolly pine plantations, soil POXC diminished with increasing soil depth and has a positive correlation with SOC and nitrogen; nevertheless, its responsiveness to silvicultural methods is constrained and scale dependent. Tree species that generate litter functioning as a resistive input, like pine trees, are expected to diminish the turnover rate of the POXC pool [131]. Plant roots provide an important source of soil AC by rapidly transferring fresh C to symbiotic microorganisms, especially bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi, which can lead to the increased dynamics of POXC [133]. In addition to direct C intake, forest tree species indirectly influence POXC via regulating soil physicochemical qualities [134] and biological activity [135]. Tree species influence soil pH [136], water content [137], and the ratio of fungal to bacterial populations [138], which subsequently regulates microbial breakdown of organic waste and the creation of POXC. Consequently, alterations in forest species composition due to species replacement, invasion, and succession can lead to significant changes in POXC levels, thereby affecting the potential for soil C to be converted into a stable soil fraction [97].

3.1.3. Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC)

MBC is the labile portion of SOC [139]. As reported by Das et al. [140] MBC in forest ecosystems is markedly affected by tree species, temperature, precipitation, soil depth, and the quality of organic matter, exhibiting a positive association with SOC and soil basal respiration. Tree species and their age significantly impact MBC as they control rhizosphere environments through root exudation, microbial C and N dynamics, litter, and nutrient release [141]. Tree species with high-quality litter and active rhizosphere environments tend to facilitate more microbial growth and bacterial diversity [142]. Putra et al. [143] revealed that agroforestry systems augment soil MBC via increased canopy cover and litter inputs relative to annual cropping and degraded grasslands. Microbial associations play a crucial role in the processing of the global C cycle [144]. Turnover of microorganisms, followed by necromass production, is a significant source of stable C in soils [145]. Camenzind et al. [146] also illustrated that microbial mortality pathways significantly influence the content and longevity of microbial necromass, thereby affecting SOC sequestration, and emphasizing that both microbial proliferation and mortality are crucial to the soil microbial C pump.
Plants with attributes of high microbial productivity or efficiency in using C in soils can increase the contribution of microbial residues to SOC [147]. Therefore, species-specific rhizosphere microenvironments can control microbial biomass [148,149] and indirectly control SOC in soils. Jiang et al. [150] found that tree plantations influence soil microbial biomass, and the conversion of grassland to plantation increased MBC. In the significance of tree species on MBC content Wu et al. [151] also mentioned that the mix of tree species plays a vital role in increasing MBC in the forest compared to a pure stand. In this regard, Duan et al. [18] also emphasized that the increased tree species diversity promoted microbial C use efficiency via modifying soil microbial biomass and, therefore, boosting soil C storage or MBC in subtropical forests. Similarly, an increase in soil MBC content by enhancing tree species diversity in subtropical secondary forests was reported by Yuan et al. [152].

3.2. The Intermediate SOC Pool (IC)

Particulate Organic Carbon (POC)

POC is a fraction of SOC that is mechanically defined by its particle size (commonly 53–250 µm) [153] derived mainly from plant residues that are not fully decomposed and contain high amounts of fungal materials and lignin [154]. As a result, there is an intimate relationship between POC and the amount of litter [155,156]. Tree species that generate high-quality and large amounts of organic litter materials, particularly those of high complexity, contribute significantly to the development of POC, especially in surface soil [157]. On the other hand, forest management and forest conversion can decrease this fraction of SOC [158,159]. Differences in chemical composition and decomposition rates among various species also affect both the accumulation and stability of POC. Specifically, POC stability was higher beneath species with higher root N concentrations and lower amounts of acid-insoluble compounds, and lower beneath species with higher tissue calcium (Ca) content. In contrast, MAOC (see Section Mineral-Associated Organic C (MAOC)) appeared less sensitive to species identity over the timescale studied. These results indicate that tree species regulate particulate and mineral-associated C pools through tissue composition, root traits, and decomposition patterns, with POC being more responsive to species-specific traits, while MAOC remains relatively stable [160]. Even if POC is quite susceptible to physical disturbance and microbial degradation, some species provide greater physical protection against disturbance through aggregation, enhancing their long-term stability [161]. Tong et al. [162] reported that afforestation, particularly with Robinia pseudoacacia L. (robinia) and Populus tomentosa Carrière (poplar), increased the physical protection of POC by enhancing intra-microaggregate formation and improving soil structure. These species resulted in greater overall soil SOC accumulation than Caragana korshinskii Kom. (caragana) and Hippophae rhamnoides L. (buckthorn), which showed smaller increases and more limited effects across the soil profile. Angst et al. [160] also emphasized the essential role of tree species in regulating soil C stabilization by controlling the decomposition and physical protection of POC. Consequently, changes in the diversity of species can significantly influence the contribution of POC to total SOC.

3.3. The Passive SOC Pool (PC)

Mineral-Associated Organic C (MAOC)

MAOC is a form of organic C in the soil that forms and is stabilized due to the association of organic matter with minerals like clay and oxides of Fe and Al [163]. The formation of MOAC can be affected by climate conditions, as reported by Li et al. [164] SOC stock increases in the form of MOAC content in the environment with less rainfall. Organo-mineral materials in this condition act as a barrier to C degradation by microorganisms; hence, C stabilization occurs through MAOC [165,166]. MAOC is considered a stable form of C in the soil [167]. Furthermore, MAOC mainly comprises microbial products with elevated nitrogen content, which remains in the soil due to chemical bonding with calcium, magnesium, and manganese oxides, in addition to physical protection afforded by macroaggregates [168,169]. Moreover, the MOAC content in the soil depends on several parameters, including polyvalent cations, acidification, and nutrient availability, which affect microbial biomass content. Thus, the leaching of calcium and magnesium through soil acidification and reducing nutrient availability and microbial biomass leads to a decrease in MOAC content in the soil [166,170,171,172].
Forest tree species largely indirectly control the formation process of MAOC, primarily through the regulation of both the quantity and chemistry of C inputs to the soil [173]. In this regard, Chen et al. [174] reported that in subtropical forests characterized by various tree species, MAOC was 78%–86% of SOC content, establishing it as the predominant SOC pool and a crucial regulator of microbial biomass and enzyme activities. The microbial symbiosis of the ECM with forest tree roots also impacts the formation of more persistent MAOC [94]. Differences among forest tree species in root and leaf litter chemistry, as well as exudation, influence microbial processing, a key factor in the formation of MAOC [175,176,177]. Dai et al. [178] stated that the addition of plant litter of London plane tree (Platanus × acerifolia) enhanced MAOC by 0.90 to 2.09 times, with leaf litter exhibiting the most significant effect and branch litter the least. The creation of MAOC occurs through two pathways, referred to as ex vivo and in vivo. The ex vivo process involves the mineral adsorption of low-molecular-weight DOC resulting from exoenzyme depolymerization or plant litter exudate, in the absence of microbial transformation. Conversely, the in vivo route necessitates the microbial digestion of plant litter, resulting in the production of microbial secretions or necromass [166,178,179,180]. Consequently, numerous recent and previous studies have also emphasized the critical and vital role of plant species in the formation of MAOC and, therefore, SOC stabilization [181,182,183,184]. The effects of different tree species or functional groups on soil organic carbon (SOC) and its fractions, the impacted soil components, and the relevant references are summarized in Table 1.

4. Tree Species Effects on Soil Carbon Stabilization Pathways

Tree species affect the mechanisms by which C is stabilized in soils. The regulation of biological, chemical, and physical processes by tree species influences these phenomena [160]. Tree species-specific materials interact with microorganisms and minerals in soils to determine the efficiency of the stabilization process [193]. An understanding of the role of various forest tree species in enhancing or inhibiting the progression of stabilization processes is essential and relevant, especially in forest management [194,195].

4.1. Mineral-Associated C Formation

As indicated above in the MAOC section, tree species influence the formation of mineral-bound C through the quality and quantity of organic material entering the soil [160]. These organic materials as exudates and microbial metabolic by-products, resulting from plant matter, will precipitate on especially clay mineral surfaces to create C-stable associations [196]. However, tree exudates are not the same in C stabilization in this regard Li et al. [197] reported that robust organic ligands (e.g., oxalic acid) swiftly facilitate the mobilization of MAOC through direct mineral dissolution and desorption. In contrast, simple sugars (e.g., glucose) encourage a more gradual, microbially mediated MAOC mineralization. Additionally, reductants (e.g., catechol) can initiate both processes, suggesting that the longevity of MAOC is co-regulated by mineral reactivity and biological contributions at the root-soil interface. Although, according to recent studies, it is to be considered that soil C stabilization embodies an intrinsic trade-off wherein root exudates and mineral composition together facilitate the development of MAOC but concurrently augment C losses via microbial respiration [198]. Tree species with high microbial turnover will also lead to an increase in mineral-reactive organic material [159,199]. Variations in litter chemistry and rhizosphere processes between species also influence organo-mineral interaction. Organic matter with suitable chemical properties tends to bind to the surfaces of clay and metal oxides [200]. Therefore, forest species diversity influences the soil’s ability to sequester and stabilize C through mineral associations [28].

4.2. Soil Physical Protection and Aggregation

Tree species influence soil structure through their effects on root growth [201], fungal networks [202], and organic matter inputs [203], all which impact soil aggregation [204]. Soil aggregates physically protect organic matter from microbial decomposition due to limited accessibility [1]. Plant species with dense rooting systems or extensive mycorrhizal networks can commonly promote the formation of aggregates [205]. Moreover, root development enhances soil structure by improving porosity, which supports water circulation, nutrient cycling, and protects SOC, while soil compaction undermines these benefits and reduces soil quality [206].
Aggregation patterns in soil vary significantly, depending on species-specific influence on SOC distribution within soil aggregates [207]. Stable soil aggregates can store C for an extended period, primarily when associated with fine mineral particles [1]. In this line, Ozlu and Arriaga [208] reported that the stabilization of SOC is mainly influenced by silt dominance and mineralogical composition, rather than clay concentration. Similarly, Li et al. [209] also emphasized the planting of mixed-species plantings to increase SOC sequestration by promoting soil aggregation, especially macroaggregates, and improving soil nutrient cycling in afforestation systems. Earlier research by Rodríguez et al. [210] reported enhanced SOC storage associated with increased root-derived macroaggregate formation for restoring SOC stocks in deforested Amazonian soils. Thus, different tree species indirectly control physical protection mechanisms, leading to long-term C stabilization and storage [211]. Table 2 presents an overview of how tree species or functional groups influence SOC stabilization, highlighting the affected components, study locations, and cited references.

5. Species-Specific Rhizosphere Processes and Priming Effects

The rhizosphere is an interface characterized by intense interaction between the root organs of plants, microorganisms, and organic matter in soils [224,225]. Tree species differ in their ability to regulate rhizosphere interactions via root exudation [226], microorganisms [227], and nutrient exchange [228]. These interactions have a substantial effect on SOC through priming interactions [229,230].
Priming can either stimulate or hinder the decay of existing SOC, depending on species and microbial responses [231]. It thus behooves us to understand species-specific rhizosphere interactions to better predict C feedback to the ecosystem.

5.1. Variability of Root Exudate Quantity and Chemical Composition Among Species

Root exudates are sugars, organic acids, and amino acids of varying complexity, depending on the species, which affects the quantity of labile C released in the soil, thereby influencing the amount of easily accessible C provided to soil microorganisms [232,233]. Similarly, Yan et al. [234] by meta-analysis of 104 publications, indicated that root exudate chemistry and environmental context jointly influence priming effects on SOC decomposition, highlighting the general importance of root-derived inputs in soil C cycling. Bolan et al. [235] likewise, observed that carboxylates from rhizosheath, derived from plant roots and soil microorganisms, enhance the turnover of SOC by facilitating nutrient uptake and increasing microbial activity, hence inducing priming effects that govern C decomposition processes. However, according to recent research, the mixing of tree species primarily alters the chemical composition of root exudates rather than their quantity, with these changes reflecting interactions among species and varying by stand age, thereby influencing belowground C dynamics [226]. Exudate chemical differences also control microbial nutrient demand and metabolism [236]. Depending on their release, unique release method, and content, root exudates consist of diffusates (low-molecular-weight organic molecules that passively permeate the rhizosphere), secretions (which the plant meticulously regulates, encompassing chemicals that facilitate signaling, nutrient absorption, and stress resilience), and excretions (including mucus, which facilitates root penetration) [237,238,239]. Exudates are also classified by molecular weight: low-molecular-weight exudates include amino acids, sugars, organic acids, and secondary metabolites, whereas high-molecular-weight exudates are predominantly composed of proteins and polysaccharides [237,238]. The presence of higher proportions of low-molecular-weight compounds stimulates faster microbial uptake [240], while the production of more complex compounds may delay microbial activity. Bacteria preferentially use compounds derived from root exudates rather than from native SOM under the condition that C and N are abundant [241].
Tree species show significant variation in the rate and composition of root exudates released in the rhizosphere [242,243]. According to Neumann et al. [244] about half of the C assimilated by soil-grown plants is preserved as root tissue, and half of this C in root is related to the composition of root products, including root exudates, border cells, and root debris. Parameters, including plant species, cultivar, age, soil characteristics, and stress levels (like drought and salinity stress), affect the volume of these exudates [245]. Consistent with these findings Brunn et al. [246] revealed that in drought conditions, Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies maintained root exudation despite a nearly 50% decrease in C assimilation, allocating 1.0% and 2.5% of net assimilated C, respectively, with drought enhancing C allocation to exudation by two- to three-fold. In this line, Li et al. [247] reported reduced root C, not N exudation in Picea crassifolia, resulting in a lower C:N ratio of root exudates under drought stress conditions. Furthermore, Jing et al. [248] found that upon the addition of N and variation in soil properties, various plant species exhibited distinct responses to root exudation. The Pinus tabulaeformis, a tree in the forest canopy, produced the highest amount of exudate, followed by the Rosa xanthina, a shrub in the understory, and the Carex lancifolia, a grass in the understory. Carbohydrates constituted the primary component of trees and shrub exudates, whereas fatty acids were predominant in grass exudates. The leaf and root exudate metabolomes of four subtropical forest trees, including Cinnamomum camphora, Cyclobalanopsis glauca, Daphniphyllum oldhamii, and Schima superba, were determined by Weinhold et al. [242]. They reported that Flavonoids predominate in leaf metabolites. At the same time, carboxylic acids and prenol lipids were more prevalent in root exudates, which suggested that changes in root exudate composition reflect quality differences rather than merely an increase in total C input to the rhizosphere resulting from diversity. In addition, as discussed above, by promoting microbial activity and bacterial community composition, C-rich root exudates, such as carboxylic acids and sugars, have essential roles in C dynamics [249]. Therefore, the role of species exudation rates as critical components contributes significantly to variability in rhizosphere effects and helps explain why plant species differ in their impacts on soil C dynamics.

5.2. Microbial Community Responses in the Rhizosphere

The root inputs specific to a species tend to have a significant impact on the population and composition of microorganisms in the rhizosphere [250]. This occurs depending on the plant’s diversity, which regulates the dominant functional groups of microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, with varied decomposition methods [251]. These microbiological changes affect the overall activity of microorganisms and the efficiency of C processing and the C cycle [144]. Plant diversity helps to promote microbial communities in the rhizosphere, thereby enhancing C sequestration [252]. Tree species known to encourage the presence of microorganisms can play a role in optimizing the turnover of C in the rhizosphere, with some species allocating more plant-derived C to microbial communities and thereby enhancing microbial activity [253]. Regarding this point, Lv et al. [254] indicated that enhancing tree species variety augments soil C dynamics by elevating MBC, improving microbial community and activity, respiration, and expediting C turnover through root-derived labile C. As a result, accelerated C cycling transpires in the rhizosphere, influencing the equilibrium of C stabilization and decomposition in forest soils. On this matter, Li et al. [255] revealed that the integration of broad-leaved trees with Pinus massoniana and Pinus elliottii enhanced the quality and mineralization rates of rhizosphere SOC by decreasing the ratios of aromatic to aliphatic compounds and increasing copiotrophic bacterial taxa, particularly Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Regarding this issue, a prior study reported the significant role of mycorrhizal associations with tree species, such as Larix spp. and Suillus grevillei, which function as crucial reservoirs for plant-derived C. As mentioned above, the differences in mycorrhizal growth forms and hyphal lifespan affect the quantity, distribution, and sequestration of C in forest ecosystems [256]. Furthermore, additional evidence has indicated that in organic soil, Betula pendula, relative to Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies, demonstrated elevated MBC, alongside heightened fungal and Gram-positive bacterial indicators but in mineral soil, all tree species similarly stimulated microbial activity and C mineralization, with no notable differences among species, indicating that vegetation presence rather than species identity drives microbial responses [257]. Similarly, changes in the microbial communities in the rhizospheres and rhizoplanes of two forest tree species, including Larix eurolepis and Picea sitchensis, predominantly altered differences in soil C compounds, including sugars, carboxylic acids, and amino acids, reported by Grayston and Campbell [258]. Notably, Jia et al. [259] emphasized the different origins of soil C with different microbial life under different tree species and reported that ECM-Pinus massoniana resulted in increased accumulation of plant and microbial-derived C. In contrast, AM-Castanopsis eyrie exhibited diminished microbial necromass stability and a reduced contribution of microorganisms to rhizosphere C in the Gutianshan subtropical forest of China. Along similar lines, Sinha et al. [260] indicated significant potential of forest tree Aegle marmelos with the highest MBC and turnover rate, for restoring soil C functioning in damaged mining soils of Dhanbad, India. Overall, accumulating evidence from multiple studies supports the importance of tree species in shaping microbial communities as an essential parameter in soil C dynamics [261,262,263,264,265].

5.3. Enzyme Activities and SOC Decomposition

Various species of trees regulate the enzymatic process in the breakdown of organic matter [266]. The amount of C from litter and roots influenced the enzymatic activity in the decomposition of cellulose, lignin, and organic matter [267]. However, according to Xu et al. [268] the activity and variability of enzymes did not significantly influence long-term C sequestration in the forest zone. They reported that polyphenol oxidase activity in the forest soil increased with recovery time, while urease and catalase activity decreased. Saccharase showed a cubic response, but despite these enzyme changes, SOC stability was mainly unaffected, suggesting that enzyme dynamics have a minimal impact on long-term C storage in the Loess Plateau of China.
Rhizosphere microorganisms can also change the soil’s enzymatic content for the decomposition of organic matter in the forest [269]. Regarding this issue Lin et al. [270] stated that the rhizospheric microorganisms in Kashmir forests demonstrate considerable enzymatic activity that facilitates the decomposition of conifer litter, hence reducing litter accumulation and fostering the natural regeneration of Picea smithiana and Abies pindrow.
Various species of trees found in a forest significantly impact soil enzyme function, as different species result in varying levels and qualities of organic matter, which is added to the soil [271]. Although greater organic inputs can generally stimulate microbial activity through increased substrate availability, tree species also differ in litter chemistry and root inputs, which can influence enzyme activity patterns. For instance, deciduous or evergreen species, or mixed species, create different enzymatic activities in the soil. As reported by Wang et al. [272], mixed-species plantations of Quercus variabilis and Platycladus orientalis enhance enzymatic activity and overall soil quality in comparison to monocultures. In this context, Hu et al. [273] also stated that composite leaf litter from Cunninghamia lanceolata, Liquidambar formosana, and Alnus cremastogyne species enhanced soil microbial biomass and enzymatic activity (urease, invertase, and dehydrogenase), thereby promoting SOC transformation. Conversely, the monospecific litter of Chinese fir (C. lamceolata), characterized by a high C:N ratio, enhances polyphenol oxidase activity and prolongs the decomposition process. The significant role of Species mixing in Chinese fir plantations in enhancing enzymatic activities and SOC has also been reported by Guo et al. [274]. Furthermore, Fu et al. [275] explained that increased tree species diversity, enhanced acid phosphatase and urease activities, decreased the relative abundance of ECM fungi, and increased saprotrophic fungi, augmenting SOC dynamics and total N, nutrient availability in subtropical evergreen forests. As indicated above, there are interconnections in the activities of enzyme functions and SOC decomposition for different species of trees. In the decomposition of organic litter, the balance between hydrolases and oxidases plays an important role. According to Xu et al. [276], in the decomposition of litter in Robinia pseudoacacia plantations, the labile SOC fractions and stability were influenced by modifying the activity of microbial carbon-degrading enzymes. As the labile SOC fractions increase, hydrolase activity decreases while oxidase activity increases. Litter quantity, lignin concentration, soil moisture, and oxidase activity favorably affect SOC fractions, but cellulose and soil pH exert negative influences, indicating that higher soil pH and greater cellulose availability are associated with lower SOC accumulation and stability, reflecting shifts in the balance between hydrolase and oxidase activities during decomposition.

5.4. Positive and Negative Priming Effects

Forest tree species exert their effects on the rhizosphere priming effect and SOC through variations in their root systems, primarily in terms of root properties and C deposition in the soil [277]. As mentioned above, tree species differ in terms of the quantity and quality of root exudates that are released. This affects microbial activity in the rhizosphere [278]. Labile root exudates, such as organic acids and sugars, accelerate microbial growth and the production of enzymes, thereby causing positive priming and the rapid degradation of existing SOC [234]. There are also variations in litter quantities and qualities among different species of trees, and these significantly influence microbe and SOC dynamics [279]. Although there are many complex results about lignin decomposition, in general, the litter with low lignin content and low C:N ratios decomposes at a higher rate, increasing the requirements for microbial growth and thereby inducing SOC mineralization [56,280]. Litter with high lignin and phenolic compounds, found among some conifer species, decomposes at a slower rate [281], reflecting the high metabolic cost of oxidative enzyme production, and restricts microbe development, thus resulting in negative or weak priming and higher SOC stabilization [282]. Moreover, root-derived C inputs are one of the critical factors that govern microbial dynamics in the rhizosphere and significantly have a priming effect and control SOC dynamics [283]. Cheng et al. [284] indicated that the priming effect generated by root-derived C inputs varies from a reduction in SOC breakdown by 50% to an enhancement of 380%.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations are another important association where different kinds of tree species can regulate priming effects. In general, AM fungus-related tree species would favor saprotrophic microbial activity, leading to increased positive priming effects. In the case of ECM-related tree species, there would be competition between free microbes and nutrients for nutrients in soil, thereby increasing the preservation of SOC in soil, leading to negative or weak priming effects [90,285].
According to de Graaff et al. [286] surface soils contain elevated levels of total and labile C that may be due to the priming of SOC by root exudates, which is markedly affected by soil depth. Conversely, deeper soils exhibit diminished priming effects due to lower C availability. These differences may be related to the different root systems of plant species. For species with shallow-rooting habits, there is priming of the surface soil, while for species with deep-rooting habits, there is priming of the subsoil. Furthermore, microbial activity, which contributes to the positive priming effect of SOC, is also observed in surface soil under Picea schrenkiana forest in the Tianshan Mountains [287].

6. Influence of Tree Species Diversity and Forest Mixtures on SOC Dynamics

Tree species diversity influences SOC turnover due to variations in the amount, quality, and location of organic matter inputs into the soil [288]. A forest ecosystem combines different organic matter inputs, root systems, and microbial activities of various tree species and contributes to complex SOC turnover compared to a single-species system [13].
Knowledge of diversity effects is essential for projecting SOC response to diversity in mixed forests.

6.1. Complementarity in Litter and Root Inputs in Mixed Forests

Complementarity in litter inputs, as well as root inputs, is a significant factor that leads to improved soil function in mixed forests compared to monocultures [289]. Since different species of trees produce litter with varying chemical properties, such as C:N ratios, lignin content, or nutrient concentration, when this litter is mixed, a mutual interaction occurs during the decomposition process, leading to the quicker release of nutrients or improved decomposition of the organic matter [290]. As reported by Ding et al. [291] mixed plantations of Pinus massoniana with certain broadleaved species, particularly deep-rooted species such as Bretschneidera sinensis and Camellia oleifera, enhanced the water conservation capability of the litter–soil system more effectively than monoculture plants. The extent of this improvement was significantly influenced by species complementarity, particularly in terms of root features and litter attributes, underscoring the importance of deliberate species selection in plantation management.
In the belowground, the complementarity of root inputs further regulates forest C cycling by enhancing the diversity of C inputs to the soil [292]. Usually, the different species coexisting in a forest differ in their root dimensions, root depth distribution, root turnover, or root exudate composition, or in the mixing of tree species, allowing C to be deposited at various levels of the soil [293,294]. Species with less deep roots mainly deposit labile C to the topsoil, while those with deeper roots deposit C to the subsoil via fine root turnover and exudation. This reflects differences in vertical C distribution reported in the literature rather than distinct or exclusive C fractions. These processes may enhance C stabilization, as lower C mineralization rates in subsoil layers have been reported in previous studies [223,295]. In this regard, Ding et al. [296] observed that mixed forest stands (coniferous and broadleaf) improved soil microbial functionality, interaction networks, and ecosystem multifunctionality in comparison to monocultures, particularly in surface soils. Nonetheless, these beneficial mixing effects were diminished or negated with greater soil depth. Germon et al. [297] reported that the combination of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis significantly improved fine-root biomass, root morphological efficiency, and deep-soil exploration, resulting in elevated C inputs throughout the soil profile.
In combination with litter and root contributions, mixed forests may enhance C sequestration and contribute to greater aboveground C storage compared with monoculture systems [298].

6.2. Effects of Tree Species Diversity on Microbial Diversity and Function

A key factor influencing the dynamics of SOC in mixed forests is microbial diversity [299]. A growing body of evidence further supports this view [300,301,302]. A greater number of tree species is often associated with a greater number of taxa, as well as a higher functional diversity of microbes, which increases the range of available microbial functions [303,304]. Beyond this, microorganisms with various functions can facilitate the thorough decomposition of organic C compounds, as well as interact with one another to control the rate of C cycling [305]. An enhanced variety of tree species is associated with increased microbial diversity due to the varied C sources. Varied inputs of organic matter promote differentiation among microbial communities, thereby altering the functional composition of microorganisms [306].
Beyond these findings, increased functional diversity of microorganisms can change the stability of SOC through the effect of microbial C use efficiency and the ratio of C mineralization versus incorporation into stable organic form [307]. From a broader perspective, further research has shown that higher functional diversity of microbes often leads to the generation of diverse enzymes and biochemicals, reducing the recalcitrance of organic C and facilitating its conversion into microbes and microbial necromass [305,308]. It should be noted that microbial necromass is considered an essential and stable part of SOC, and its formation in mixed forests largely depends on the composition and functional traits of microbes [309].
Crucially, recent advances have revealed that changes in microbial community composition in mixed forests, such as the shift from dominance by bacteria, fungi, or mycorrhizae, affect SOC significantly in mixed forests [302]. Greater fungal and mycorrhizal diversity is considered to result in reduced C turnover or improved C stabilization through interactions with soil minerals or the formation of soil aggregates [310]. Similarly, Ortiz et al. [311] found that afforestation and the growth of woody vegetation in Mediterranean alpine grasslands modify soil aggregation, microbial community composition, and SOC dynamics, promoting macroaggregation while diminishing microaggregate stability. This results in a reallocation of SOC and N, as well as a transition to fungal-dominated microbial communities, signifying that SOM in high-elevation ecosystems is susceptible to persistent environmental and climatic changes. Zhang et al. [204] demonstrated that mixed forests enhance bacterial and fungal diversity in soil aggregates, particularly those smaller than 0.25 mm, in contrast to pure Castanopsis hystrix plantings. The regulation of these effects is primarily influenced by soil NH4+-N, pH, and organic C, suggesting that mixing tree species is an effective strategy for improving soil microbial structure and fertility in artificial forests. In addition, Anthony et al. [312], after examination of 238 forest plots, emphasized the critical role of diverse fungal communities in the C dynamic compared to bacterial diversity in European forests. Taken together, the current body of knowledge implies that microbial diversity in mixed forests affects SOC somewhat indirectly via the efficiency of C processing or C persistence rather than the addition of C inputs in mixed forests [313,314,315].

6.3. SOC Dynamics in Mixed-Species vs. Monoculture Forests

Although the effects of mixed-species forests on microbial populations, litter, and SOC dynamics are well noted, there are other differences between mixed and monocultured forests regarding SOC dynamics. Mixed forests often exhibit higher stand productivity, improved resource use efficiency, and greater structural complexity, which may contribute to increased organic matter inputs and consequently higher SOC levels [316,317]. Additionally, variations in forest canopies may have effects on the soil microclimate, thereby affecting the rate of SOC turnover [318].
Furthermore, previous research broadly agrees that tree species composition also impacts SOC cycles in various ways, depending on differing patterns of C allocation and rooting depths [229]. In the case of mixed tree species forests, non-overlapping rooting patterns result in C accumulation in diverse depths of the soil profile, which in turn leads to an increase in the proportion of SOC that is stabilized in the deeper layers [319,320]. Monoculture forests, on the other hand, often show less vertical complementarity in rooting patterns, which may result in a comparatively greater proportion of SOC inputs concentrated in surface layers, depending on species characteristics [321].
Evidence from the literature consistently shows that physical protection of the SOC is another difference between mixed-species and monoculture stands. Increased structural heterogeneity can stimulate improvements in soil structure, leading to the development of soil aggregates and enhanced physical protection of organic C within mixed species stands, compared to monoculture stands [22,209].

6.4. Temporal Stability of SOC in Species-Rich Forests

Temporal stability of SOC is the ability of forest soils to sustain relatively constant levels of C over space and time, despite changes and variations [322]. In the context of species-diversified mixed forests, the temporal stability of SOC is of fundamental importance because of the significant role of these forests in long-term C sequestration and climate change mitigation. Compared to monoculture forests, mixed forests exhibit higher functional plant trait diversity, which influences the patterns of C entry, turnover, and storage. Further support for this pattern has been reported by Li et al. [323], who indicated that although thinning initially (after four years) marked a decrease in SOC dynamics, microbial biomass, and enzyme activity in mixed forests of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata and Pinus tabuliformis, but commenced recovery after twelve years, approaching the levels observed in unthinned stands. These findings highlighted the transient disturbance of soil C processes caused by thinning and the resilience of forest soils, underscoring the importance of recovery periods in sustainable forest management. Notably, Yu et al. [324] stated that mixed-species broadleaved forests (older than 30 years), rather than coniferous stands, enhance productivity and C sequestration, thereby guiding sustainable forest management in subtropical regions of China.
Biodiversity in mixed stands supports SOC stability owing to complementarity in leaf litter and root addition. The leaf litter from different species of trees exhibits varying chemical properties, resulting in differing decomposition rates that do not facilitate rapid C loss in the soil [325]. Notably, recent findings suggest that incorporating oak into pine stands may significantly augment decomposition and maintain elevated soil C reserves, hence enhancing overall soil multifunctionality [326]. However, differences in rooting habits result in increased additions to the soil C pool at various soil depths. Complementarity in these C addition mechanisms enhances the stability of the soil C pool, making it less sensitive to environmental fluctuations [160,327]. Non-forest ecosystems, such as wetlands, also demonstrate depth-dependent persistence of SOC under climatic and anthropogenic pressures [328].
Additionally, interactions between plant species diversity, soil microbes, and microclimates are other factors that influence the stability of SOC over time [21]. Diverse plant species promote diverse and functional microbial communities that are involved in converting SOC into more stable forms [329]. Additionally, globally, diverse forests are known to reduce soil temperature and water variability due to variations in canopy species [330]. This ensures that microbial activity and decomposition are constant, and as such, variability in SOC is maintained [18].
The higher temporal stability of SOC in species-rich mixed forests also has significant implications for forest management and climate adaptation. Species-rich forests are generally less vulnerable to disturbance by drought, pests, and climate extremes, making it less likely that they suffer sudden losses of SOC [331,332,333]. Osuri et al. [334] emphasized the role of temporal stability of SOC in species-rich forests and reported that Species-rich forests, due to functional complementarity among tree species, exhibit greater stability and drought resistance in C sequestration compared to monodominant teak (Tectona grandis) and Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.) plantations, that rendering diverse forests more dependable for long-term climate change mitigation. Therefore, promoting mixed forests and protecting natural species-rich forests may contribute to higher temporal stability of soil C. Furthermore, as climate variability increases, it is essential to maintain species-rich forests.

7. Conclusions

This review highlighted that tree species are identified as major controls of SOC dynamics processes via their influence on soil C inputs, soil C fractions, and soil C stabilization mechanisms. Variations in litter production, litter qualities, root system properties, root excretion, or mycorrhizal types in tree species can considerably affect the production, turnover, or generation of active and passive C fractions. Soil C inputs influenced by tree species can regulate microbial processes, decomposition, and interactions between soil minerals and soil organic matter, thereby controlling the balance between labile and stable soil carbon fractions and the overall SOC pool in forests.
In addition, the diversity of tree species is shown to be a crucial driver of soil C stability through the promotion of litter and root contributions, as well as the support of a range of microbiological activities. Mixed-species forests alter the nature of the rhizosphere and the related priming effects. This leads to a reduced dominance of the more rapid-turnover C fractions and, hence, an increasing likelihood of C persistence within the soil pools. With these perceptions, this study underlined tree species composition and diversity as major drivers of long-term soil C sequestration.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The article processing charge (APC) was funded by the author.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Razzaghi, S.; Kapur, S.; Islam, R.K.; Rezaei, M.; Valizadeh, A.; Lagomarsino, A. Protected carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry in soils under red pine and oak forests. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2021, 30, 11047–11056. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, I.U. Forest soil C: Stock and stability under global change. In New Perspectives in Forest Science; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; p. 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tate, K.; Ross, D.; O’brien, B.; Kelliher, F. Carbon storage and turnover, and respiratory activity, in the litter and soil of an old-growth southern beech (Nothofagus) forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1993, 25, 1601–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lichter, J.; Billings, S.A.; Ziegler, S.E.; Gaindh, D.; Ryals, R.; Finzi, A.C.; Jackson, R.B.; Stemmler, E.A.; Schlesinger, W.H. Soil carbon sequestration in a pine forest after 9 years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Glob. Change Biol. 2008, 14, 2910–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Razzaghi, S.; Islam, K.R.; Ahmed, I.A.M. Deforestation impacts soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools and carbon lability under Mediterranean climates. J. Soils Sediments 2022, 22, 2381–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tian, Y.; Huang, Z.L.; Xiao, W.F.; Tan, M.Z. Advances on effect of forest management on soil carbon sequestration. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 2012, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bouwman, A.F.; Leemans, R. The role of forest soils in the global carbon cycle. In Carbon Forms and Functions in Forest Soils; Soil Science Society America: Madison, WI, USA, 1995; pp. 503–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Babur, E.; Dindaroglu, T. Seasonal changes of soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in different forest ecosystems. In Environmental Factors Affecting Human Health; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yuan, Y.; Li, J.; Yao, L. Soil microbial community and physicochemical properties together drive soil organic carbon in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations of different stand ages. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zha, T.; Luo, Z.; Zheng, J.; Sun, O.J. Predicting soil respiration using carbon stock in roots, litter and soil organic matter in forests of Loess Plateau in China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 57, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Supriya, K. Carbon Sequestration and Storage: Traits that Influence Forest Carbon Dynamics. In Enhancing Forest Resilience through Plant Functional Traits; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2025; pp. 144–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lal, R. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 220, 242–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qin, Z.; Nie, Y.; Ming, A.; Yang, K.; Min, H.; Wei, H.; Shen, W. Tree species mixing promotes surface soil organic carbon accumulation in mid-age and stability in old-growth forests. Plant Soil 2025, 512, 711–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hobbie, S.E.; Ogdahl, M.; Chorover, J.; Chadwick, O.A.; Oleksyn, J.; Zytkowiak, R.; Reich, P.B. Tree species effects on soil organic matter dynamics: The role of soil cation composition. Ecosystems 2007, 10, 999–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cao, J.; He, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, S.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Fu, S. Leaf litter contributes more to soil organic carbon than fine roots in two 10-year-old subtropical plantations. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gessner, M.O.; Chauvet, E. Importance of stream microfungi in controlling breakdown rates of leaf litter. Ecology 1994, 75, 1807–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Berendse, F.; Berg, B.; Bosatta, E. The effect of lignin and nitrogen on the decomposition of litter in nutrient-poor ecosystems: A theoretical approach. Can. J. Bot. 1987, 65, 1116–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Duan, P.; Fu, R.; Nottingham, A.T.; Domeignoz-Horta, L.A.; Yang, X.; Du, H.; Wang, K.; Li, D. Tree species diversity increases soil microbial carbon use efficiency in a subtropical forest. Glob. Change Biol. 2023, 29, 7131–7144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Haq, H.u.; Hauer, A.; Singavarapu, B.; Christel, H.; Cesarz, S.; Eisenhauer, N.; Ferlian, O.; Bruelheide, H.; Wubet, T. The interactive effect of tree mycorrhizal type, mycorrhizal type mixture and tree diversity shapes rooting zone soil fungal communities in temperate forest ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2025, 39, 1441–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ortaş, I.; Razzaghi, S.; Rafique, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizae: Effect of rhizosphere and relation with carbon nutrition. In Plant-Microbe Interaction: An Approach to Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 125–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Staszel-Szlachta, K.; Błońska, E.; Lasota, J. Stabilization of soil organic matter in Luvisols under the influence of various tree species in temperate forests. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.; Xu, L. Effects of tree species composition in plantation forest on soil aggregate stability and organic carbon pools in northeastern China. Geoderma Reg. 2024, 39, e00899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Razzaghi, S. The effect of soil organic carbon fractions on soil properties and crop yield. In Innovative Agricultural and Environmental Solutions; Bellitürk, K., Bara, M.F., Çelik, A., Eds.; Iksad Publishing House: Ankara, Türkiye, 2022; pp. 99–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aziz, I.; Mahmood, T.; Islam, K.R. Effect of long term no-till and conventional tillage practices on soil quality. Soil Tillage Res. 2013, 131, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pellegrini, S.; Elio Agnelli, A.; Costanza Andrenelli, M.; Barbetti, R.; Castelli, F.; Costantini, E.A.; Lagomarsino, A.; Pasqui, M.; Tomozeiu, R.; Razzaghi, S. Dynamics of aggregate stability and soil organic C distribution as affected by climatic aggressiveness: A mesocosm approach. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 27 April–2 May 2014; p. 6978. [Google Scholar]
  26. Álvaro-Fuentes, J.; Cantero-Martínez, C.; López, M.; Paustian, K.; Denef, K.; Stewart, C.; Arrúe, J. Soil aggregation and soil organic carbon stabilization: Effects of management in semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rondon, T.; Hernandez, R.M.; Guzman, M. Soil organic carbon, physical fractions of the macro-organic matter, and soil stability relationship in lacustrine soils under banana crop. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Razzaghi, S.; Vignozzi, N.; Kapur, S. Mineralogical and micromorphological characteristics of red pine and oak root zone soils in southern Turkey. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2017, 41, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, M.T.; Supronienė, S.; Žvirdauskienė, R.; Aleinikovienė, J. Climate, soil, and microbes: Interactions shaping organic matter decomposition in croplands. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lal, R.; Monger, C.; Nave, L.; Smith, P. The role of soil in regulation of climate. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2021, 376, 20210084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, A.; Zha, T.; Zhang, Z. Variations in soil organic carbon storage and stability with vegetation restoration stages on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena 2023, 228, 107142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Razzaghi, S.; Aslan, P. Soil organic carbon fraction dynamics and morphological responses of Allium species under Chlorella vulgaris application. ISPEC J. Agric. Sci. 2026, 10, 166–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sajjad, H.; Kumar, P.; Srivastava, P.K.; Pathak, S.O.; Ahmed, M.; Kumar, V.; Dobriyal, M.; Kumari, P.; Pandey, P.C. Assessing soil organic carbon and its relation with biophysical and ecological parameters in tropical forest ecosystem India. Geocarto Int. 2025, 40, 2441388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lorenz, K.; Lal, R. The importance of carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. In Carbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystems; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 241–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gholz, H.L. Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area, and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 1982, 63, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zianis, D.; Mencuccini, M. Aboveground net primary productivity of a beech (Fagus moesiaca) forest: A case study of Naousa forest, northern Greece. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bonan, G.B. Importance of leaf area index and forest type when estimating photosynthesis in boreal forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 1993, 43, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Petritan, I.C.; Mihăilă, V.-V.; Bragă, C.I.; Boura, M.; Vasile, D.; Petritan, A.M. Litterfall production and leaf area index in a virgin european beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)–Silver fir (Abies alba mill.) forest. Dendrobiology 2020, 83, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, J.M.; Black, T.A. Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 1992, 15, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, L.; Tian, F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Schurgers, G.; Fensholt, R. Acceleration of global vegetation greenup from combined effects of climate change and human land management. Glob. Change Biol. 2018, 24, 5484–5499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yan, G.; Hu, R.; Luo, J.; Weiss, M.; Jiang, H.; Mu, X.; Xie, D.; Zhang, W. Review of indirect optical measurements of leaf area index: Recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 265, 390–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kala, J.; Decker, M.; Exbrayat, J.-F.; Pitman, A.J.; Carouge, C.; Evans, J.P.; Abramowitz, G.; Mocko, D. Influence of leaf area index prescriptions on simulations of heat, moisture, and carbon fluxes. J. Hydrometeorol. 2014, 15, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tupek, B.; Mäkipää, R.; Heikkinen, J.; Peltoniemi, M.; Ukonmaanaho, L.; Hokkanen, T.; Nöjd, P.; Nevalainen, S.; Lindgren, M.; Lehtonen, A. Foliar Turnover Rates in Finland-Comparing Estimates from Needle-Cohort and Litterfall-Biomass Methods; Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board: Helsinki, Finland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  44. Muukkonen, P. Needle biomass turnover rates of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) derived from the needle-shed dynamics. Trees 2005, 19, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aerts, R.; Chapin, F.S., III. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. In Advances in Ecological Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; Volume 30, pp. 1–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gleason, S.; Ares, A.; Scarggs, A. Foliar resorption in tree species. In New Research on Forest Ecology; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vergutz, L.; Manzoni, S.; Porporato, A.; Novais, R.F.; Jackson, R.B. Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants. Ecol. Monogr. 2012, 82, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dai, Y.; Gong, F.; Yang, X.; Chen, X.; Su, Y.; Liu, L.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Sun, Q. Litterfall seasonality and adaptive strategies of tropical and subtropical evergreen forests in China. J. Plant Ecol. 2022, 15, 320–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, Y.; Li, Q.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Hu, X.; Qi, J.; Lu, Z. The leaf litterfall pattern in an old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest and its implication for leaf litter mixing studies. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2024, 54, e03121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, B.B.; Han, S.H.; Hernandez, J.O.; An, J.Y.; Youn, W.B.; Choi, H.-S.; Jung, S. Leaf litter decomposition of deciduous Quercus acutissima Carruth. and evergreen Quercus glauca Thunb. in an inter-site experiment in three contrasting temperate forest stands in South Korea. Ann. For. Sci. 2021, 78, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaneko, N.; Salamanca, E. Mixed leaf litter effects on decomposition rates and soil microarthropod communities in an oak–pine stand in Japan. Ecol. Res. 1999, 14, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cornelissen, J. An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. J. Ecol. 1996, 84, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Niinemets, Ü.; Tamm, Ü. Species differences in timing of leaf fall and foliage chemistry modify nutrient resorption efficiency in deciduous temperate forest stands. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Polyakova, O.; Billor, N. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 253, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Swift, M.J.; Heal, O.W.; Anderson, J.M.; Anderson, J. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems; University of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA, 1979; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  56. Melillo, J.M.; Aber, J.D.; Muratore, J.F. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 1982, 63, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Taylor, B.R.; Parkinson, D.; Parsons, W.F. Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: A microcosm test. Ecology 1989, 70, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Artemkina, N. Relationships between Phenolic Compounds, Tannins, Lignin, Nitrogen, and Carbon in the Plants of Dwarf Shrub-Green Moss Spruce Forests of the Kola Peninsula, Russia. Russ. J. Ecol. 2023, 54, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lin, Q.; Huai, Z.; Luqman, R.; Enamul, H.M.; Yu, F.; Sun, C.; Xu, T.; Ma, J. Land-type conversion reshapes microbial engines: Decoding litter decomposition dynamics in the Yellow River wetland soils. Authorea 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hättenschwiler, S. Effects of tree species diversity on litter quality and decomposition. In Forest Diversity and Function: Temperate and Boreal Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wei, C.; Xiao, L.; Shen, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, W. Effects of tree species on mineral soil C, N, and P, litter and root chemical compositions: Cross-sites comparisons and their relationship decoupling in Northeast China. Trees 2021, 35, 1971–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cotrufo, M.F.; Ineson, P.; Rowland, A. Decomposition of tree leaf litters grown under elevated CO2: Effect of litter quality. Plant Soil 1994, 163, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Thirunavukkarasu, A. Lignin Degradation Dynamics in Boreal Forest Soils. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gentile, R.; Vanlauwe, B.; Six, J. Litter quality impacts short-but not long-term soil carbon dynamics in soil aggregate fractions. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fanin, N.; Bertrand, I. Aboveground litter quality is a better predictor than belowground microbial communities when estimating carbon mineralization along a land-use gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 94, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Paustian, K.; Ågren, G.; Bosatta, E. Modelling litter quality effects on decomposition and soil organic matter dynamics. In Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition Conference; Cadisch, G., Giller, K.E., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1997; pp. 313–335. [Google Scholar]
  67. Stevenson, F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  68. Nielsen, K.L.; Lynch, J.P.; Jablokow, A.G.; Curtis, P.S. Carbon cost of root systems: An architectural approach. Plant Soil 1994, 165, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Srivastava, R.; Yetgin, A. An overall review on influence of root architecture on soil carbon sequestration potential. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2024, 36, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fernando, E.A.J.; Selvaraj, M.; Uga, Y.; Busch, W.; Bowers, H.; Tohme, J. Going deep: Roots, carbon, and analyzing subsoil carbon dynamics. Mol. Plant 2024, 17, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Guan, D.; Chen, Y.; Motelica-Heino, M.; Peng, Y.; Lee, S.Y. The role of mangrove fine root production and decomposition on soil organic carbon component ratios. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tian, S.; Liu, X.; Jin, B.; Zhao, X. Contribution of fine roots to soil organic carbon accumulation in different desert communities in the sangong river basin. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sariyildiz, T. Effects of tree species and topography on fine and small root decomposition rates of three common tree species (Alnus glutinosa, Picea orientalis and Pinus sylvestris) in Turkey. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 335, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jackson, R.B.; Mooney, H.A.; Schulze, E.-D. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7362–7366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gill, R.A.; Jackson, R.B. Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol. 2000, 147, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Finzi, A.C.; Abramoff, R.Z.; Spiller, K.S.; Brzostek, E.R.; Darby, B.A.; Kramer, M.A.; Phillips, R.P. Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 21, 2082–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Bardgett, R.D.; Mommer, L.; De Vries, F.T. Going underground: Root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Meier, I.C.; Tückmantel, T.; Heitkötter, J.; Müller, K.; Preusser, S.; Wrobel, T.J.; Kandeler, E.; Marschner, B.; Leuschner, C. Root exudation of mature beech forests across a nutrient availability gradient: The role of root morphology and fungal activity. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Averill, C.; Bhatnagar, J.M.; Dietze, M.C.; Pearse, W.D.; Kivlin, S.N. Global imprint of mycorrhizal fungi on whole-plant nutrient economics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 23163–23168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  81. van Der Heijden, M.G.; Martin, F.M.; Selosse, M.A.; Sanders, I.R. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: The past, the present, and the future. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1406–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Leake, J.; Johnson, D.; Donnelly, D.; Muckle, G.; Boddy, L.; Read, D. Networks of power and influence: The role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1016–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jevon, F.V.; Lang, A.K. Tree biomass allocation differs by mycorrhizal association. Ecology 2022, 103, e3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Read, D.J.; Leake, J.R.; Perez-Moreno, J. Mycorrhizal fungi as drivers of ecosystem processes in heathland and boreal forest biomes. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1243–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Shao, S.; Wurzburger, N.; Sulman, B.; Pries, C.H. Ectomycorrhizal effects on decomposition are highly dependent on fungal traits, climate, and litter properties: A model-based assessment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 184, 109073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ortas, I.; Razzaghi, S. Effects of mycorrhizal inoculation and phosphorus fertilization on tomato, eggplant, green, and bell pepper plants’ yield and nutrient uptake under field conditions. Int. J. Innov. Hortic. 2025, 14, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Qin, Z.-F.; Xie, M.-X.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Li, X.; Li, H.-G.; Zhang, J.-L. Research progress in soil organic carbon stabilization mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2023, 29, 756–766. [Google Scholar]
  88. Lindahl, B.D.; Tunlid, A. Ectomycorrhizal fungi–potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1443–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Averill, C.; Turner, B.L.; Finzi, A.C. Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage. Nature 2014, 505, 543–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Yin, L.; Dijkstra, F.A.; Phillips, R.P.; Zhu, B.; Wang, P.; Cheng, W. Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees cause a higher carbon to nitrogen ratio of soil organic matter decomposition via rhizosphere priming than ectomycorrhizal trees. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 157, 108246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Willis, A.; Rodrigues, B.; Harris, P.J. The ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2013, 32, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Parihar, M.; Rakshit, A.; Meena, V.S.; Gupta, V.K.; Rana, K.; Choudhary, M.; Tiwari, G.; Mishra, P.K.; Pattanayak, A.; Bisht, J.K. The potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in C cycling: A review. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 1581–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Soudzilovskaia, N.A.; van der Heijden, M.G.; Cornelissen, J.H.; Makarov, M.I.; Onipchenko, V.G.; Maslov, M.N.; Akhmetzhanova, A.A.; van Bodegom, P.M. Quantitative assessment of the differential impacts of arbuscular and ectomycorrhiza on soil carbon cycling. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Liu, S.; Bradford, M.A.; Ward, E.B. Radiocarbon evidence of the role of tree mycorrhizal type in modulating mean soil carbon age. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 27 April–2 May 2025; p. EGU25-14043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Carteron, A.; Cichonski, F.; Laliberté, E. Ectomycorrhizal stands accelerate decomposition to a greater extent than arbuscular mycorrhizal stands in a northern deciduous forest. Ecosystems 2022, 25, 1234–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Priyanka, K. Soil carbon: An overview on soil carbon function and its fractionation. Curr. World Environ. 2016, 11, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Razzaghi, S. Unraveling the Impact of Diverse Vegetative Covers on Soil Carbon Fractions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dou, Y.; Liao, J.; An, S. Importance of soil labile organic carbon fractions in shaping microbial community after vegetation restoration. Catena 2023, 220, 106707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, X.; Min, F.; Yu, D.; Xin, Z.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Sun, X.; Pan, J. Mean residence times of active and slow soil organic carbon pools in croplands across China. Catena 2021, 202, 105271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Islam, K.R.; Roth, G.; Rahman, M.A.; Didenko, N.O.; Reeder, R.C. Cover crop complements flue gas desulfurized gypsum to improve no-till soil quality. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2021, 52, 926–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Blanco-Moure, N.; Gracia, R.; Bielsa, A.C.; López, M.V. Soil organic matter fractions as affected by tillage and soil texture under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 2016, 155, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bongiorno, G.; Bünemann, E.K.; Oguejiofor, C.U.; Meier, J.; Gort, G.; Comans, R.; Mäder, P.; Brussaard, L.; de Goede, R. Sensitivity of labile carbon fractions to tillage and organic matter management and their potential as comprehensive soil quality indicators across pedoclimatic conditions in Europe. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 99, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fang, F.; Hu, Y.-K.; Gong, Y.-M.; Yang, X.-J.; Liu, Y.-Y. Desert soil organic carbon characterized by the vertical distribution of soil microbial carbon. J. Desert Res. 2012, 33, 777–781. [Google Scholar]
  104. Semenov, V.; Lebedeva, T.; Sokolov, D.; Zinyakova, N.; Lopes de Gerenu, V.; Semenov, M. Measurement of the soil organic carbon pools isolated using bio-physical-chemical fractionation methods. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2023, 56, 1327–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Qi, P.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Cai, L.; Jiao, Y.; Li, Z.; Han, G. Changes in soil particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon concentrations under nitrogen addition in China—A meta-analysis. Plant Soil 2023, 489, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhao, J.; Minasny, B.; Setia, R.; Zhou, Z.; Ren, C.; Biswas, A.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, L.; Shi, Z.; Chen, S. Global distribution and predictors of the mineral-associated to total soil organic carbon ratio: An indicator of soil carbon stability. Earth Crit. Zone 2025, 2, 100035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Guo, X.; Rossel, R.A.V.; Wang, G.; Xiao, L.; Wang, M.; Zhang, S.; Luo, Z. Particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon turnover revealed by modelling their long-term dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 173, 108780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Marschner, B.; Kalbitz, K. Controls of bioavailability and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils. Geoderma 2003, 113, 211–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chen, H.; Liu, X.; Blosser, G.D.; Rücker, A.M.; Conner, W.H.; Chow, A.T. Molecular dynamics of foliar litter and dissolved organic matter during the decomposition process. Biogeochemistry 2020, 150, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kaiser, K.; Kalbitz, K. Cycling downwards–dissolved organic matter in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 52, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hansson, K.; Kleja, D.B.; Kalbitz, K.; Larsson, H. Amounts of carbon mineralised and leached as DOC during decomposition of Norway spruce needles and fine roots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tan, S.; Yue, K.; Peñuelas, J.; Svenning, J.-C.; Van Meerbeek, K.; Peng, Y.; Wu, Q.; Fan, Y.; Heděnec, P.; Li, Z. Forest streams may discharge one tenth of the annual total global forest carbon sink through dissolved organic carbon. Innov. Geosci. 2025, 3, 100148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Canuel, E.A.; Cammer, S.S.; McIntosh, H.A.; Pondell, C.R. Climate change impacts on the organic carbon cycle at the land-ocean interface. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2012, 40, 685–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Casas-Ruiz, J.P.; Bodmer, P.; Bona, K.A.; Butman, D.; Couturier, M.; Emilson, E.J.; Finlay, K.; Genet, H.; Hayes, D.; Karlsson, J. Integrating terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to constrain estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Isidorov, V.; Maslowiecka, J.; Sarapultseva, P. Bidirectional emission of organic compounds by decaying leaf litter of a number of forest-forming tree species in the northern hemisphere. Geoderma 2024, 443, 116812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Uselman, S.M.; Qualls, R.G.; Lilienfein, J. Production of total potentially soluble organic C, N, and P across an ecosystem chronosequence: Root versus leaf litter. Ecosystems 2009, 12, 240–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wölfelschneider, M.; Dittmar, T.; Hatje, V.; Seidel, M. The influence of mangrove forests on estuarine dynamics of dissolved organic matter. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2025, 101, 1191–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Qin, W.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, B. Responses of Soil Dissolved Organic Carbon to Climate Warming: A Review. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2024, 60, 758–766. [Google Scholar]
  119. Wu, X.; Wu, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, Q.; Zhou, J.; Hess, N.J.; Hazen, T.C.; Yang, W.; Chakraborty, R. Microbial interactions with dissolved organic matter drive carbon dynamics and community succession. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Malik, A.; Gleixner, G. Importance of microbial soil organic matter processing in dissolved organic carbon production. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 86, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Kalbitz, K.; Kaiser, K. Contribution of dissolved organic matter to carbon storage in forest mineral soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2008, 171, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kalbitz, K.; Solinger, S.; Park, J.-H.; Michalzik, B.; Matzner, E. Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: A review. Soil Sci. 2000, 165, 277–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Fröberg, M.; Hansson, K.; Kleja, D.B.; Alavi, G. Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen leaching from Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch stands in southern Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 1742–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hansson, K.; Olsson, B.A.; Olsson, M.; Johansson, U.; Kleja, D.B. Differences in soil properties in adjacent stands of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch in SW Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Andersen, M.; Raulund-Rasmussen, K.; Strobel, B.; Hansen, H. The effects of tree species and site on the solubility of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2004, 154, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Xu, J.-W.; Zheng, Z.; Ji, J.-H.; Mao, R. Non-additive effects on biodegradation of moso bamboo litter-and broadleaf tree litter-leached dissolved organic matter mixtures in a subtropical forest of southern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 915, 170104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Culman, S.W.; Snapp, S.S.; Freeman, M.A.; Schipanski, M.E.; Beniston, J.; Lal, R.; Drinkwater, L.E.; Franzluebbers, A.J.; Glover, J.D.; Grandy, A.S. Permanganate oxidizable carbon reflects a processed soil fraction that is sensitive to management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2012, 76, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Weil, R.R.; Islam, K.R.; Stine, M.A.; Gruver, J.B.; Samson-Liebig, S.E. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field use. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 2003, 18, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Chambers, L.G.; Mirabito, A.J.; Brew, S.; Nitsch, C.K.; Bhadha, J.H.; Hurst, N.R.; Berkowitz, J.F. Evaluating permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC)’s potential for differentiating carbon pools in wetland soils. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 167, 112624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Fine, A.K.; Van Es, H.M.; Schindelbeck, R.R. Statistics, scoring functions, and regional analysis of a comprehensive soil health database. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2017, 81, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kraus, T.E.; Dahlgren, R.A.; Zasoski, R.J. Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems-a review. Plant Soil 2003, 256, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Oliveira, F.C.; Bacon, A.; Fox, T.R.; Jokela, E.J.; Kane, M.B.; Martin, T.A.; Noormets, A.; Ross, C.W.; Vogel, J.; Markewitz, D. A regional assessment of permanganate oxidizable carbon for potential use as a soil health indicator in managed pine plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 521, 120423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Mahé, S.; Ineson, P.; Staddon, P.; Ostle, N.; Cliquet, J.-B.; Francez, A.-J.; Fitter, A.H.; Young, J.P.W. Active root-inhabiting microbes identified by rapid incorporation of plant-derived carbon into RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16970–16975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Woś, B.; Józefowska, A.; Likus-Cieślik, J.; Chodak, M.; Pietrzykowski, M. Effect of tree species and soil texture on the carbon stock, macronutrient content, and physicochemical properties of regenerated postfire forest soils. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 5227–5240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Marshall, V. Impacts of forest harvesting on biological processes in northern forest soils. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 133, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Xu, H.; Liu, Q.; Wang, S.; Yang, G.; Xue, S. A global meta-analysis of the impacts of exotic plant species invasion on plant diversity and soil properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Martin-Guay, M.O.; Belluau, M.; Côté, B.; Handa, I.T.; Jewell, M.D.; Khlifa, R.; Munson, A.D.; Rivest, M.; Whalen, J.K.; Rivest, D. Tree identity and diversity directly affect soil moisture and temperature but not soil carbon ten years after planting. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e8509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ao, L.; Zhao, M.; Li, X.; Sun, G. Different urban forest tree species affect the assembly of the soil bacterial and fungal community. Microb. Ecol. 2022, 83, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Bhuyan, S.; Tripathi, O.; Khan, M. Seasonal changes in soil microbial biomass under different agro-ecosystems of Arunachal Pradesh, North East India. J. Agric. Sci.-Sri Lanka 2013, 8, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Das, S.; Deb, S.; Sahoo, S.S.; Sahoo, U.K. Soil microbial biomass carbon stock and its relation with climatic and other environmental factors in forest ecosystems: A review. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2023, 43, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bauhus, J.; Pare, D. Effects of tree species, stand age and soil type on soil microbial biomass and its activity in a southern boreal forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 1077–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ndaw, S.; Gama-Rodrigues, A.; Gama-Rodrigues, E.; Sales, K.; Rosado, A. Relationships between bacterial diversity, microbial biomass, and litter quality in soils under different plant covers in northern Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Can. J. Microbiol. 2009, 55, 1089–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Putra, A.D.; Ardiansyah, N.; Ishaq, R.M.; Saputra, D.D.; Kurniawan, S.; Hairiah, K. Benefits of Agroforestry for Maintaining Soil Health: Using Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC) as an indicator. Proc. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2025, 1466, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Gougoulias, C.; Clark, J.M.; Shaw, L.J. The role of soil microbes in the global carbon cycle: Tracking the below-ground microbial processing of plant-derived carbon for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 2362–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kästner, M.; Miltner, A.; Thiele-Bruhn, S.; Liang, C. Microbial necromass in soils—Linking microbes to soil processes and carbon turnover. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 756378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Camenzind, T.; Mason-Jones, K.; Mansour, I.; Rillig, M.C.; Lehmann, J. Formation of necromass-derived soil organic carbon determined by microbial death pathways. Nat. Geosci. 2023, 16, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Xie, N.; An, T.; Zhuang, J.; Radosevich, M.; Schaeffer, S.; Li, S.; Wang, J. High initial soil organic matter level combined with aboveground plant residues increased microbial carbon use efficiency but accelerated soil priming effect. Biogeochemistry 2022, 160, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. VM, T.; Marcos ML, F. Microbial biomass and activity in a forest soil under different tree species. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 8, 878. [Google Scholar]
  149. Babur, E.; Dindaroğlu, T.; Solaiman, Z.M.; Battaglia, M.L. Microbial respiration, microbial biomass and activity are highly sensitive to forest tree species and seasonal patterns in the Eastern Mediterranean Karst Ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Jiang, H.; Yuan, C.; Wu, Q.; Heděnec, P.; Zhao, Z.; Yue, K.; Ni, X.; Wu, F.; Peng, Y. Effects of transforming multiple ecosystem types to tree plantations on soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and their ratios in China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 193, 105145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wu, Y.; Ding, B.; Zhang, Y. Impact of different forest types on soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy in the karst region of southwestern China. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1678667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Yuan, Z.; Guan, Q.; Chen, X.; Zou, P.; Gu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Niu, Y.; Meshack, A.O. Tree diversity increases soil C and N stocks of secondary forests in subtropical China. Catena 2023, 222, 106812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Six, J.; Feller, C.; Denef, K.; Ogle, S.; de Moraes Sa, J.C.; Albrecht, A. Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils-Effects of no-tillage. Agronomie 2002, 22, 755–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Six, J.; Guggenberger, G.; Paustian, K.; Haumaier, L.; Elliott, E.T.; Zech, W. Sources and composition of soil organic matter fractions between and within soil aggregates. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2001, 52, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Zheng, Z.; Xu, Q.; Hu, Y. Effects of Forest Types on Soil Particulate Organic Carbon Contents and Distribution Along a Subtropical Climate Transect in China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2025, 36, 1860–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Castellano, M.J.; Mueller, K.E.; Olk, D.C.; Sawyer, J.E.; Six, J. Integrating plant litter quality, soil organic matter stabilization, and the carbon saturation concept. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 21, 3200–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yang, J.; Huang, K.; Guan, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, R.; Chen, L.; Wang, S.; Yang, Q. Retention of harvest residues promotes the accumulation of topsoil organic carbon by increasing particulate organic carbon in a Chinese fir plantation. For. Ecosyst. 2024, 11, 100229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Feng, J.; Jiang, D.; Zhu, B. Forest management causes soil carbon loss by reducing particulate organic carbon in Guangxi, Southern China. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Gao, F.; Cui, X.; Chen, M.; Sang, Y. Forest conversion changes soil particulate organic carbon and mineral-associated organic carbon via plant inputs and microbial processes. Forests 2023, 14, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Angst, G.; Mueller, K.E.; Eissenstat, D.M.; Trumbore, S.; Freeman, K.H.; Hobbie, S.E.; Chorover, J.; Oleksyn, J.; Reich, P.B.; Mueller, C.W. Soil organic carbon stability in forests: Distinct effects of tree species identity and traits. Glob. Change Biol. 2019, 25, 1529–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Rocci, K.S.; Lavallee, J.M.; Stewart, C.E.; Cotrufo, M.F. Soil organic carbon response to global environmental change depends on its distribution between mineral-associated and particulate organic matter: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 793, 148569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Tong, X.; Han, X.; Faqi, W.; Zhao, F.; Ren, C.; Li, J. Change in carbon storage in soil physical fractions after afforestation of former arable land. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2016, 80, 1098–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Fu, C.; Li, Y.; Zeng, L.; Tu, C.; Wang, X.; Ma, H.; Xiao, L.; Christie, P.; Luo, Y. Climate and mineral accretion as drivers of mineral-associated and particulate organic matter accumulation in tidal wetland soils. Glob. Change Biol. 2024, 30, e17070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Li, Y.; Fu, C.; Hu, J.; Zeng, L.; Tu, C.; Luo, Y. Soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry and fractions in blue carbon ecosystems: Implications for carbon accumulation in allochthonous-dominated habitats. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 5913–5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Angst, G.; Mueller, K.E.; Nierop, K.G.; Simpson, M.J. Plant-or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 156, 108189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lavallee, J.M.; Soong, J.L.; Cotrufo, M.F. Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Georgiou, K.; Jackson, R.B.; Vindušková, O.; Abramoff, R.Z.; Ahlström, A.; Feng, W.; Harden, J.W.; Pellegrini, A.F.; Polley, H.W.; Soong, J.L. Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Midwood, A.J.; Hannam, K.D.; Gebretsadikan, T.; Emde, D.; Jones, M.D. Storage of soil carbon as particulate and mineral associated organic matter in irrigated woody perennial crops. Geoderma 2021, 403, 115185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Dorodnikov, M.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Fangmeier, A.; Wiesenberg, G.L. C and N in soil organic matter density fractions under elevated atmospheric CO2: Turnover vs. stabilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Haddix, M.L.; Gregorich, E.G.; Helgason, B.L.; Janzen, H.; Ellert, B.H.; Cotrufo, M.F. Climate, carbon content, and soil texture control the independent formation and persistence of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter in soil. Geoderma 2020, 363, 114160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Lugato, E.; Lavallee, J.M.; Haddix, M.L.; Panagos, P.; Cotrufo, M.F. Different climate sensitivity of particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter. Nat. Geosci. 2021, 14, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Samson, M.-E.; Chantigny, M.H.; Vanasse, A.; Menasseri-Aubry, S.; Royer, I.; Angers, D.A. Management practices differently affect particulate and mineral-associated organic matter and their precursors in arable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 107867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Cheng, H.; Su, Y.; Huang, Z.; Lin, S.; Yan, J.; Wu, G.; Huang, G. Distribution, characteristics, and importance of particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon in China forest: A meta-analysis. PeerJ 2025, 13, e19189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Chen, R.; Yin, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, T.; Jia, L.; Jiang, Q.; Lyu, M.; Yao, X.; Chen, G. Mineral-associated organic carbon predicts the variations in microbial biomass and specific enzyme activities in a subtropical forest. Geoderma 2023, 439, 116671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Qiu, Q.; Mao, Z.; Gan, Z.; Mgelwa, A.S.; Leuzinger, S.; Hu, Y. Low-quality litter promotes soil organic carbon accumulation by inhibiting priming effects and stimulating mineral-associated organic carbon formation. J. Soils Sediments 2025, 25, 2584–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Córdova, S.C.; Olk, D.C.; Dietzel, R.N.; Mueller, K.E.; Archontouilis, S.V.; Castellano, M.J. Plant litter quality affects the accumulation rate, composition, and stability of mineral-associated soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Poeplau, C.; Begill, N.; Liang, Z.; Schiedung, M. Root litter quality drives the dynamic of native mineral-associated organic carbon in a temperate agricultural soil. Plant Soil 2023, 491, 439–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Dai, W.; Xiao, R.; Wei, C.; Yang, F. Plant litter traits control the accumulation of mineral-associated organic carbon by influencing its molecular composition and diversity. Soil Tillage Res. 2025, 253, 106667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Liang, C.; Amelung, W.; Lehmann, J.; Kästner, M. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 2019, 25, 3578–3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wang, B.; An, S.; Liang, C.; Liu, Y.; Kuzyakov, Y. Microbial necromass as the source of soil organic carbon in global ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 108422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Zhai, D.; Wang, Y.; Liao, C.; Men, X.; Wang, C.; Cheng, X. Soil carbon accumulation under afforestation is driven by contrasting responses of particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2024, 38, e2024GB008116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zhu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yao, X.; Chen, G.; Bai, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, D.; Deng, Q. Estimating microbial necromass contribution to mineral-associated organic matter: Comparison of stoichiometric and biomarker methods. Plant Soil 2025, 517, 887–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Zhu, Y.; Hu, M.; Hui, D.; Niu, G.; Li, J.; Yao, X.; Hu, Y.; Huang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D. Plants and microorganisms both contribute to soil organic matter formation through mineral interactions: Evidence from a subtropical forest succession. Geoderma 2024, 452, 117099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Chen, J.; Ji, C.; Fang, J.; He, H.; Zhu, B. Dynamics of microbial residues control the responses of mineral-associated soil organic carbon to N addition in two temperate forests. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 141318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Lai, L.; Zhao, J.; Dou, Y. Fungal necromass carbon contributes more to POC and MAOC under different forest types of Qinling Mountains. Plant Soil 2025, 512, 603–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Tian, Y.; Li, P.; Ma, C.; Li, Y.; Lin, Q.; Hou, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhu, X.; Shen, C. Tree species and urban green space types jointly drive rhizosphere SOC fractionation and stability via microbial-enzymatic pathways. J. Plant Ecol. 2025; accepted manuscript. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Xu, Y.; Jiao, J.; Fang, Y.; Yao, L.; Wu, C. The role of mixed-species forests in post-fire soil organic carbon restoration: Mechanisms and microbial-mediated pathways. For. Ecol. Manag. 2026, 603, 123429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Han, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liu, H.; Cao, Q. FeOx-Driven Soil Aggregation Boosts MAOC Accumulation and POC Protection in Subtropical Mixed Conifer–Broadleaf Forests. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2025, 76, e70197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Boča, A.; Van Miegroet, H. Can carbon fluxes explain differences in soil organic carbon storage under aspen and conifer forest overstories? Forests 2017, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Peng, Y.; Schmidt, I.K.; Zheng, H.; Heděnec, P.; Bachega, L.R.; Yue, K.; Wu, F.; Vesterdal, L. Tree species effects on topsoil carbon stock and concentration are mediated by tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability at the global scale. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 478, 118510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Schleuß, P.-M.; Heitkamp, F.; Leuschner, C.; Fender, A.-C.; Jungkunst, H.F. Higher subsoil carbon storage in species-rich than species-poor temperate forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 014007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hou, G.; Delang, C.O.; Lu, X.; Gao, L. A meta-analysis of changes in soil organic carbon stocks after afforestation with deciduous broadleaved, sempervirent broadleaved, and conifer tree species. Ann. For. Sci. 2020, 77, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Dohnalkova, A.C.; Tfaily, M.M.; Chu, R.K.; Smith, A.P.; Brislawn, C.J.; Varga, T.; Crump, A.R.; Kovarik, L.; Thomashow, L.S.; Harsh, J.B. Effects of microbial-mineral interactions on organic carbon stabilization in a ponderosa pine root zone: A micro-scale approach. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 799694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Jandl, R.; Vesterdal, L.; Olsson, M.; Bens, O.; Badeck, F.; Roc, J. Carbon sequestration and forest management. CABI Rev. 2007, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Song, Y.; Zhai, J.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, L.; Wang, G.; Ma, L.; Xue, S. Forest management practices of Pinus tabulaeformis plantations alter soil organic carbon stability by adjusting microbial characteristics on the Loess Plateau of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 766, 144209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Shabtai, I.A.; Hafner, B.D.; Schweizer, S.A.; Höschen, C.; Possinger, A.; Lehmann, J.; Bauerle, T. Root exudates simultaneously form and disrupt soil organo-mineral associations. Commun. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Li, H.; Bolscher, T.; Winnick, M.; Tfaily, M.M.; Cardon, Z.G.; Keiluweit, M. Simple plant and microbial exudates destabilize mineral-associated organic matter via multiple pathways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 3389–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Liang, G.; Stark, J.; Waring, B.G. Mineral reactivity determines root effects on soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Sokol, N.W.; Bradford, M.A. Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input. Nat. Geosci. 2019, 12, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Fu, Y.; Lin, D.; Hou, M.; Li, X.; Hu, D.; Wang, Z. Transformation of soil organic matter subjected to environmental disturbance and preservation of organic matter bound to soil minerals: A review. J. Soils Sediments 2023, 23, 1485–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Giuliani, L.M.; Hallett, P.D.; Loades, K.W. Effects of soil structure complexity to root growth of plants with contrasting root architecture. Soil Tillage Res. 2024, 238, 106023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Rillig, M.C.; Aguilar-Trigueros, C.A.; Bergmann, J.; Verbruggen, E.; Veresoglou, S.D.; Lehmann, A. Plant root and mycorrhizal fungal traits for understanding soil aggregation. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1385–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Devi, A.S. Influence of trees and associated variables on soil organic carbon: A review. J. Ecol. Environ. 2021, 45, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, F. Impact of Tree Species Mixture on Microbial Diversity and Community Structure in Soil Aggregates of Castanopsis hystrix Plantations. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Li, M.; Chen, X.W.; Leung, A.K. Grass species and mycorrhizal fungi improved aggregate stability of compacted and vegetated soils. Plant Soil 2025, 511, 1081–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Negi, M.; Sharma, S.; Singh, M. Plant-Driven Soil Dynamics: Exploring the Role of Roots, Fungi and Soil Traffic in Shaping the Soil Structure. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2025, 56, 2727–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Chen, X.; Gsell, T.; Yunger, J.; Randa, L.; Peng, Y.; Carrington, M. Soil Aggregation, Aggregate Stability, and Associated Soil Organic Carbon in Huron Mountains Forests, Michigan, USA. Forests 2025, 16, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ozlu, E.; Arriaga, F.J. The role of carbon stabilization and minerals on soil aggregation in different ecosystems. Catena 2021, 202, 105303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Li, M.; Ding, X.; Chen, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Meng, M.; Zhang, G.; Cao, Y. Mixed plantations enhance soil aggregation and carbon storage: A global meta-analysis. Catena 2025, 254, 109013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Rodríguez, L.; Suárez, J.C.; Rodriguez, W.; Artunduaga, K.J.; Lavelle, P. Agroforestry systems impact soil macroaggregation and enhance carbon storage in Colombian deforested Amazonia. Geoderma 2021, 384, 114810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Shi, K.; Liao, J.; Zou, X.; Chen, H.Y.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Wanek, W.; Ni, J.; Ren, T.; Zhang, C.; Yan, Z. Forest development induces soil aggregate formation and stabilization: Implications for sequestration of soil carbon and nitrogen. Catena 2024, 246, 108363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. López-Ulloa, M.; Veldkamp, E.; De Koning, G. Soil carbon stabilization in converted tropical pastures and forests depends on soil type. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005, 69, 1110–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Shi, J.; Deng, L.; Gunina, A.; Alharbi, S.; Wang, K.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Shangguan, Z.; Kuzyakov, Y. Carbon stabilization pathways in soil aggregates during long-term forest succession: Implications from δ13C signatures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 180, 108988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Tang, G.; Li, K. Tree species controls on soil carbon sequestration and carbon stability following 20 years of afforestation in a valley-type savanna. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 291, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Luo, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, L.; Frew, A.; Yu, H.; Hou, E.; Wen, D. Mechanisms of soil organic carbon stabilization and its response to conversion of primary natural broadleaf forests to secondary forests and plantation forests. Catena 2024, 240, 108021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Andivia, E.; Rolo, V.; Jonard, M.; Formánek, P.; Ponette, Q. Tree species identity mediates mechanisms of top soil carbon sequestration in a Norway spruce and European beech mixed forest. Ann. For. Sci. 2016, 73, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Craig, M.E.; Geyer, K.M.; Beidler, K.V.; Brzostek, E.R.; Frey, S.D.; Stuart Grandy, A.; Liang, C.; Phillips, R.P. Fast-decaying plant litter enhances soil carbon in temperate forests but not through microbial physiological traits. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Bai, X.; Yu, X.; Li, X.; Wang, P.; Yao, B. Enhancing soil carbon sequestration in coniferous forests through mixed planting and natural regeneration: Novel mechanisms mediated by microbial life strategies and necromass. Ind. Crops Prod. 2026, 239, 122463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Zavarzina, A.; Kulikova, N.; Belov, A.; Demin, V.; Rozanova, M.; Pogozhev, P.; Danilin, I. Soil Carbon Storage in Forest and Grassland Ecosystems Along the Soil-Geographic Transect of the East European Plain: Relation to Soil Biological and Physico-Chemical Properties. Forests 2026, 17, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Ma, Y.; Tigabu, M.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Zhao, P.; Turay, M.B.; Wang, G.; Guo, F. Impacts of in-situ wildfire smoke deposition on soil carbon stoichiometry, enzymatic activities and bacterial community structure in Cunninghamia lanceolata forests. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2026, 218, 106770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Shankar, A.; Kashyap, K.; Garkoti, S.C. Influence of vegetation and soil properties on carbon stocks in Shorea robusta forests under different disturbance regimes. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 380, 124916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Bazgir, M.; Omidipour, R.; Heydari, M.; Zainali, N.; Hamidi, M.; Dey, D.C. Prioritizing woody species for the rehabilitation of arid lands in western Iran based on soil properties and carbon sequestration. J. Arid. Land 2020, 12, 640–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Adams, K. Effect of Root Carbon on Microbial Abundance and Carbon Cycling in the Topsoil and Subsoil. Master’s Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canda, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  224. Naorem, A.; Rao, M.C.S.; Shidayaichenbi, D.; Saranya, R. Beneficial Microbe-Induced Secondary Metabolites: Interactions with Plants and Soil Microbiome. In Industrial Applications of Microbial Secondary Metabolites; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2026; pp. 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Starkey, R.L. Interrelations between microorganisms and plant roots in the rhizosphere. Bacteriol. Rev. 1958, 22, 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. He, P.; Song, H.; Liu, R.; Luo, X.; Ming, A.; Shu, W.; Shen, W. Tree species mixing effects on root exudation rate and exudate metabolome: Variations across forest stand age. Tree Physiol. 2025, 45, tpaf082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Kaźmierczak, M.; Błońska, E.; Kempf, M.; Zarek, M.; Lasota, J. Rhizosphere effect: Microbial and enzymatic dynamics in the rhizosphere of various shrub species. Plant Soil 2025, 511, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Jimeno-Alda, J.; Navarro-Cano, J.A.; Goberna, M.; Verdú, M. Differences in nutrient content between heterospecific plant neighbours affect respiration rates of rhizosphere microbiota. Plant Soil, 2025; early access. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Brunn, M.; Mueller, C.W.; Chari, N.R.; Meier, I.C.; Obersteiner, S.; Phillips, R.P.; Taylor, B.; Tumber-Dávila, S.J.; Ullah, S.; Klein, T. Tree carbon allocation to root exudates: Implications for carbon budgets, soil sequestration and drought response. Tree Physiol. 2025, 45, tpaf026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Panchal, P.; Preece, C.; Peñuelas, J.; Giri, J. Soil carbon sequestration by root exudates. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Yin, L.; Dijkstra, F.A.; Wang, P.; Zhu, B.; Cheng, W. Rhizosphere priming effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics among tree species with and without intraspecific competition. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 1036–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Hubova, P.; Tejnecky, V.; Ash, C.; Boruvka, L.; Drabek, O. Low-molecular-mass organic acids in the forest soil environment. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2017, 14, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Cheng, W.; Kuzyakov, Y. Root effects on soil organic matter decomposition. Roots Soil Manag. Interact. Between Roots Soil 2005, 48, 119–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Yan, S.; Yin, L.; Dijkstra, F.A.; Wang, P.; Cheng, W. Priming effect on soil carbon decomposition by root exudate surrogates: A meta-analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 178, 108955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Bolan, N.; Mukherjee, S.; Sharma, S.; Bolan, S.; Yuan, J.; Yang, S.; Peacock, C.; Otero-Fariña, A.; Adeleke, R.; Obi, L. Exudates of Carboxylates by Roots and Their Implications for Nutrient, Contaminant and Carbon Dynamics in Soil. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2025, 44, 399–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Zambelli, A.; Nocito, F.F.; Araniti, F. Unveiling the multifaceted roles of root exudates: Chemical interactions, allelopathy, and agricultural applications. Agronomy 2025, 15, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Badri, D.V.; Vivanco, J.M. Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 666–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Sun, L.; Ataka, M.; Han, M.; Han, Y.; Gan, D.; Xu, T.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, B. Root exudation as a major competitive fine-root functional trait of 18 coexisting species in a subtropical forest. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Koo, B.J.; Adriano, D.; Bolan, N.; Barton, C. Root exudates and microorganisms. In Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment; Elsevier-Hanley and Belfus Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Bastida, F.; Torres, I.F.; Hernández, T.; Bombach, P.; Richnow, H.H.; García, C. Can the labile carbon contribute to carbon immobilization in semiarid soils? Priming effects and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 57, 892–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Wei, L.; Razavi, B.S.; Wang, W.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, S.; Wu, J.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Ge, T. Labile carbon matters more than temperature for enzyme activity in paddy soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Weinhold, A.; Döll, S.; Liu, M.; Schedl, A.; Pöschl, Y.; Xu, X.; Neumann, S.; van Dam, N.M. Tree species richness differentially affects the chemical composition of leaves, roots and root exudates in four subtropical tree species. J. Ecol. 2022, 110, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Ma, W.; Tang, S.; Dengzeng, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, T.; Ma, X. Root exudates contribute to belowground ecosystem hotspots: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 937940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Neumann, G.; Massonneau, A.; Langlade, N.; Dinkelaker, B.; Hengeler, C.; Römheld, V.; Martinoia, E. Physiological aspects of cluster root function and development in phosphorus-deficient white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Ann. Bot. 2000, 85, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Uren, N. Types, amounts, and possible functions of compounds released into rhizosphere by soil-grown plants. In The Rhizosphere, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 35–56. [Google Scholar]
  246. Brunn, M.; Hafner, B.D.; Zwetsloot, M.J.; Weikl, F.; Pritsch, K.; Hikino, K.; Ruehr, N.K.; Sayer, E.J.; Bauerle, T.L. Carbon allocation to root exudates is maintained in mature temperate tree species under drought. New Phytol. 2022, 235, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Li, W.; Zhang, H.; Pu, Y.; Li, F. Effects of drought on carbon–nitrogen dynamics in root exudates of Qinghai spruce. Tree Physiol. 2025, 45, tpaf085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Jing, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, G.; Liu, G.; Cheng, Y. The mechanism effects of root exudate on microbial community of rhizosphere soil of tree, shrub, and grass in forest ecosystem under N deposition. ISME Commun. 2023, 3, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Wen, T.; Yu, G.-H.; Hong, W.-D.; Yuan, J.; Niu, G.-Q.; Xie, P.-H.; Sun, F.-S.; Guo, L.-D.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Shen, Q.-R. Root exudate chemistry affects soil carbon mobilization via microbial community reassembly. Fundam. Res. 2022, 2, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Negre Rodríguez, M.; Pioppi, A.; Kovács, Á.T. The role of plant host genetics in shaping the composition and functionality of rhizosphere microbiomes. Msystems 2025, 10, e0004124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Shrestha, R.; Huusko, K.; Sietiö, O.-M.; Schmid, B.; Cappeli, S.L.; Thitz, P.; Gerin, S.; Laine, A.-L.; Lohila, A.; Heinonsalo, J. Impacts of diverse undersown cover crops on seasonal soil microbial properties. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2025, 101, fiaf068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Domeignoz-Horta, L.A.; Cappelli, S.L.; Shrestha, R.; Gerin, S.; Lohila, A.K.; Heinonsalo, J.; Nelson, D.B.; Kahmen, A.; Duan, P.; Sebag, D. Plant diversity drives positive microbial associations in the rhizosphere enhancing carbon use efficiency in agricultural soils. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Ladygina, N.; Hedlund, K. Plant species influence microbial diversity and carbon allocation in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Lv, C.; Wang, C.; Cai, A.; Zhou, Z. Global magnitude of rhizosphere effects on soil microbial communities and carbon cycling in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 856, 158961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Li, W.-Q.; Wu, Z.-J.; Zong, Y.-Y.; Wang, G.G.; Chen, F.-S.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Li, J.-J.; Fang, X.-M. Tree species mixing enhances rhizosphere soil organic carbon mineralization of conifers in subtropical plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 516, 120238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Churchland, C.; Grayston, S.J. Specificity of plant-microbe interactions in the tree mycorrhizosphere biome and consequences for soil C cycling. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Priha, O.; Grayston, S.J.; Pennanen, T.; Smolander, A. Microbial activities related to C and N cycling and microbial community structure in the rhizospheres of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula pendula seedlings in an organic and mineral soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1999, 30, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Grayston, S.J.; Campbell, C.D. Functional biodiversity of microbial communities in the rhizospheres of hybrid larch (Larix eurolepis) and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). Tree Physiol. 1996, 16, 1031–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Jia, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X.; Ma, K.; Feng, X. Soil organic carbon sourcing variance in the rhizosphere vs. non-rhizosphere of two mycorrhizal tree species. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 176, 108884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Sinha, S.; Masto, R.; Ram, L.; Selvi, V.; Srivastava, N.; Tripathi, R.; George, J. Rhizosphere soil microbial index of tree species in a coal mining ecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 1824–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Ao, G.; Qin, W.; Wang, X.; Yu, M.; Feng, J.; Han, M.; Zhu, B. Linking the rhizosphere effects of 12 woody species on soil microbial activities with soil and root nitrogen status. Rhizosphere 2023, 28, 100809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Lei, J.; Wu, H.; Li, X.; Guo, W.; Duan, A.; Zhang, J. Response of rhizosphere bacterial communities to near-natural forest management and tree species within Chinese fir plantations. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0232822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Prescott, C.E.; Grayston, S.J. Tree species influence on microbial communities in litter and soil: Current knowledge and research needs. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 309, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Lladó, S.; López-Mondéjar, R.; Baldrian, P. Forest soil bacteria: Diversity, involvement in ecosystem processes, and response to global change. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017, 81, e00063-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Tu, Z.; Chen, L.; Yu, X.; Zheng, Y. Rhizosphere soil enzymatic and microbial activities in bamboo forests in southeastern China. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2014, 60, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Błońska, E.; Lasota, J.; Gruba, P. Enzymatic activity and stabilization of organic matter in soil with different detritus inputs. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 63, 242–247. [Google Scholar]
  267. Błońska, E.; Piaszczyk, W.; Staszel, K.; Lasota, J. Enzymatic activity of soils and soil organic matter stabilization as an effect of components released from the decomposition of litter. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 157, 103723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Xu, H.; Qu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, G.; Xue, S. Responses of soil enzyme activity and soil organic carbon stability over time after cropland abandonment in different vegetation zones of the Loess Plateau of China. Catena 2021, 196, 104812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Li, X.; Lianbo, S.; Wang, K.; Song, C.; Song, Y. Characteristics of ecological enzymes and nutrients mediated by soil microorganisms in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest under nitrogen deposition. Res. Sq. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Lin, H.; Chen, H.; Wu, C.; Hong, T.; Xie, A. Effects of decomposition of Aleurites montana and Phyllostachys pubescences mixed foliage litter on activity of soil enzymes. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2012, 18, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Błońska, E.; Prażuch, W.; Lasota, J. Deadwood affects the soil organic matter fractions and enzyme activity of soils in altitude gradient of temperate forests. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Shao, X.; Song, Y.; Wang, X. Influence of tree species composition on leaf and soil properties and soil enzyme activity in mixed and pure Oak (Quercus variabilis) stands. Forests 2025, 16, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zeng, D. Effects of single Chinese fir and mixed leaf litters on soil chemical, microbial properties and soil enzyme activities. Plant Soil 2006, 282, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Guo, J.; Feng, H.; McNie, P.; Liu, Q.; Xu, X.; Pan, C.; Yan, K.; Feng, L.; Goitom, E.A.; Yu, Y. Species mixing improves soil properties and enzymatic activities in Chinese fir plantations: A meta-analysis. Catena 2023, 220, 106723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Fu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Lei, P.; Xiang, W.; Ouyang, S.; Chen, L. Soil fungal communities and enzyme activities along local tree species diversity gradient in subtropical evergreen forest. Forests 2021, 12, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Xu, M.-p.; Zhi, R.-c.; Jian, J.-n.; Feng, Y.-z.; Han, X.-h.; Zhang, W. Changes in soil organic C fractions and C pool stability are mediated by C-degrading enzymes in litter decomposition of Robinia pseudoacacia plantations. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 86, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Chao, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Q.; Guan, X.; Yang, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Hu, B.; Liu, Z. Root functional traits determine the magnitude of the rhizosphere priming effect among eight tree species. Oikos 2023, 2023, e09638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Wannenmacher, M.; Haberstroh, S.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Werner, C. Site, season and soil depth affect the composition of root exudates in three temperate tree species. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 27 April–2 May 2025; p. EGU25-10145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Zheng, H.; Heděnec, P.; Rousk, J.; Schmidt, I.K.; Peng, Y.; Vesterdal, L. Effects of common European tree species on soil microbial resource limitation, microbial communities and soil carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 172, 108754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Rahman, M.M.; Tsukamoto, J.; Rahman, M.M.; Yoneyama, A.; Mostafa, K.M. Lignin and its effects on litter decomposition in forest ecosystems. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 29, 540–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Osono, T.; Hobara, S.; Koba, K.; Kameda, K.; Takeda, H. Immobilization of avian excreta-derived nutrients and reduced lignin decomposition in needle and twig litter in a temperate coniferous forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Chakrawal, A.; Lindahl, B.; Manzoni, S. Optimal lignin decomposition during litter decay. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 April 2023. Copernicus Meetings. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Kaštovská, E.; Cardenas-Hernandez, J.; Kuzyakov, Y. Priming effects in the rhizosphere and root detritusphere of two wet-grassland graminoids. Plant Soil 2022, 472, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Cheng, W.; Parton, W.J.; Gonzalez-Meler, M.A.; Phillips, R.; Asao, S.; McNickle, G.G.; Brzostek, E.; Jastrow, J.D. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Eagar, A.C.; Mushinski, R.M.; Horning, A.L.; Smemo, K.A.; Phillips, R.P.; Blackwood, C.B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal tree communities have greater soil fungal diversity and relative abundances of saprotrophs and pathogens than ectomycorrhizal tree communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e0178221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. de Graaff, M.-A.; Jastrow, J.D.; Gillette, S.; Johns, A.; Wullschleger, S.D. Differential priming of soil carbon driven by soil depth and root impacts on carbon availability. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 69, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Yin, K.; Gong, L.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Sun, X. Soil Microbiome Drives Depth-Specific Priming Effects in Picea schrenkiana Forests Following Labile Carbon Input. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Augusto, L.; Boča, A. Tree functional traits, forest biomass, and tree species diversity interact with site properties to drive forest soil carbon. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Lu, H. Species Mixing Effects on Forest Productivity in the Netherlands; Wageningen University and Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  290. Lingeri, P.C.; Piazza, M.V.; Caccia, F.D. Forest plantation diversification with Leguminosae tree species: Consequences on litter decomposition and nutrient recycling. Austral Ecol. 2023, 48, 1888–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Ding, N.; Bai, Y.; Zhou, Y. Tree species mixtures can improve the water storage of the litter–soil continuum in subtropical coniferous plantations in China. Forests 2023, 14, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Yin, S.; Chen, X.; Piton, G.; Terrer, C.; Zhou, Z.; De Deyn, G.B.; Bertrand, I.; Rasse, D.; Chen, J.; Navarro-Cano, J.A. The complementarity hypothesis reversed: Root trait similarity in species mixtures promotes soil organic carbon in agroecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2025, 203, 109736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Brassard, B.W.; Chen, H.Y.; Cavard, X.; Laganière, J.; Reich, P.B.; Bergeron, Y.; Pare, D.; Yuan, Z. Tree species diversity increases fine root productivity through increased soil volume filling. J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Ma, Z.; Chen, H.Y. Positive species mixture effects on fine root turnover and mortality in natural boreal forests. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 121, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Liang, Z.; Elsgaard, L.; Nicolaisen, M.H.; Lyhne-Kjærbye, A.; Olesen, J.E. Carbon mineralization and microbial activity in agricultural topsoil and subsoil as regulated by root nitrogen and recalcitrant carbon concentrations. Plant Soil 2018, 433, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Ding, K.; Lu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, Q.; Shen, Z.; Tong, Z.; Zhang, J. Depth-dependent effects of forest diversification on soil functionality and microbial community characteristics in subtropical forests. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 289, 127931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Germon, A.; Guerrini, I.A.; Bordron, B.; Bouillet, J.-P.; Nouvellon, Y.; de Moraes Gonçalves, J.L.; Jourdan, C.; Paula, R.R.; Laclau, J.-P. Consequences of mixing Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis trees on soil exploration by fine-roots down to a depth of 17 m. Plant Soil 2018, 424, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Warner, E.; Cook-Patton, S.; Lewis, O.; Brown, N.; Koricheva, J.; Eisenhauer, N.; Ferlian, O.; Gravel, D.; Hall, J.; Jactel, H. Young mixed planted forests store more carbon than monocultures—A meta-analysis. Front. For. Glob. Change 2023, 6, 1226514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Guo, Q.; Gong, L. Compared with pure forest, mixed forest alters microbial diversity and increases the complexity of interdomain networks in arid areas. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0264223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Jiang, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y. Effects of single and mixed species forest ecosystems on diversity and function of soil microbial community in subtropical China. J. Soils Sediments 2012, 12, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Cesarz, S.; Craven, D.; Auge, H.; Bruelheide, H.; Castagneyrol, B.; Gutknecht, J.; Hector, A.; Jactel, H.; Koricheva, J.; Messier, C. Tree diversity effects on soil microbial biomass and respiration are context dependent across forest diversity experiments. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2022, 31, 872–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, F.; Cao, Q.; Bai, Y. Mixing of pine and arbuscular mycorrhizal tree species changed soil organic carbon storage by affecting soil microbial characteristics. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 930, 172630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Singavarapu, B.; Du, J.; Beugnon, R.; Cesarz, S.; Eisenhauer, N.; Xue, K.; Wang, Y.; Bruelheide, H.; Wubet, T. Functional potential of soil microbial communities and their subcommunities varies with tree mycorrhizal type and tree diversity. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0457822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Zhang, M.; Guan, F.; Fan, S.; Zhang, X. Response of soil microbial community structure and diversity to mixed proportions and mixed tree species in bamboo–broad-leaved mixed forests. Forests 2024, 15, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Condron, L.; Stark, C.; O’Callaghan, M.; Clinton, P.; Huang, Z. The role of microbial communities in the formation and decomposition of soil organic matter. In Soil Microbiology and Sustainable Crop Production; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 81–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Gillespie, L.M.; Hättenschwiler, S.; Milcu, A.; Wambsganss, J.; Shihan, A.; Fromin, N. Tree species mixing affects soil microbial functioning indirectly via root and litter traits and soil parameters in European forests. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35, 2190–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Tao, F.; Huang, Y.; Hungate, B.A.; Manzoni, S.; Frey, S.D.; Schmidt, M.W.; Reichstein, M.; Carvalhais, N.; Ciais, P.; Jiang, L. Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage. Nature 2023, 618, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Khatoon, H.; Solanki, P.; Narayan, M.; Tewari, L.; Rai, J.; Hina Khatoon, C. Role of microbes in organic carbon decomposition and maintenance of soil ecosystem. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2017, 5, 1648–1656. [Google Scholar]
  309. Jílková, V.; Devetter, M.; Al Haj Ishak Al Ali, R.; Angel, R.; Angst, G.; Jandová, K.; Libra, M.; Starý, J. Tree species and soil depth affect microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter in temperate forest soils, surpassing the impact of microbial and faunal community composition. Funct. Ecol. 2025, 39, 2219–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Qin, H.; Niu, L.; Wu, Q.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Liang, C.; Xu, Q.; Fuhrmann, J.J.; Shen, Y. Bamboo forest expansion increases soil organic carbon through its effect on soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community and abundance. Plant Soil 2017, 420, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Ortiz, C.; Fernández-Alonso, M.J.; Kitzler, B.; Díaz-Pinés, E.; Saiz, G.; Rubio, A.; Benito, M. Variations in soil aggregation, microbial community structure and soil organic matter cycling associated to long-term afforestation and woody encroachment in a Mediterranean alpine ecotone. Geoderma 2022, 405, 115450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Anthony, M.A.; Tedersoo, L.; De Vos, B.; Croisé, L.; Meesenburg, H.; Wagner, M.; Andreae, H.; Jacob, F.; Lech, P.; Kowalska, A. Fungal community composition predicts forest carbon storage at a continental scale. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Chen, M.; Yuan, C.; He, S.; Chen, J.; Luo, J.; Ding, F.; Yan, G. Effects of Soil Microorganisms on Carbon Sequestration under Different Mixed Modification Models in Pinus massoniana L. Plantation. Forests 2024, 15, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Zhang, M.; Bai, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y.; Hu, S.; Jonathan, M.A.; Dong, L.; Yu, X. Soil microbial trait-based strategies drive the storage and stability of the soil carbon pool in Robinia pseudoacacia plantations. Catena 2023, 222, 106894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Cao, H.; Li, S.; He, H.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Huang, Q.; Cai, P.; Gao, C.-H. Stronger linkage of diversity-carbon decomposition for rare rather than abundant bacteria in woodland soils. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1115300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Binkley, D.; Stape, J.L.; Ryan, M.G. Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 193, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Ammer, C. Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Beugnon, R.; Le Guyader, N.; Milcu, A.; Lenoir, J.; Puissant, J.; Morin, X.; Hättenschwiler, S. Microclimate modulation: An overlooked mechanism influencing the impact of plant diversity on ecosystem functioning. Glob. Change Biol. 2024, 30, e17214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Fanin, N.; Maxwell, T.L.; Altinalmazis-Kondylis, A.; Bon, L.; Meredieu, C.; Jactel, H.; Bakker, M.R.; Augusto, L. Effects of mixing tree species and water availability on soil organic carbon stocks are depth dependent in a temperate podzol. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2022, 73, e13133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Kumar, T.S. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Mixed-Species Agroforestry Systems under Semi-Arid Conditions. Natl. J. For. Sustain. Clim. Change 2025, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  321. Zhao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Kang, L.; Li, M.; Zhang, G.; Cao, Y. Beyond monocultures: Optimizing soil carbon sequestration with diverse planting strategies on the Loess Plateau. Catena 2024, 246, 108447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Wang, S.; Roland, B.; Adhikari, K.; Zhuang, Q.; Jin, X.; Han, C.; Qian, F. Spatial-temporal variations and driving factors of soil organic carbon in forest ecosystems of Northeast China. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Li, Y.; Ajloon, F.H.; Wang, X.; Malghani, S.; Yu, S.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, W. Temporal effects of thinning on soil organic carbon and carbon cycling-related enzyme activities in oak-pine mixed forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 545, 121293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Yu, W.; Deng, Q.; Kang, H. Long-term continuity of mixed-species broadleaves could reach a synergy between timber production and soil carbon sequestration in subtropical China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 440, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Guo, J.; Kneeshaw, D.; Peng, C.; Wu, Y.; Feng, L.; Qu, X.; Wang, W.; Pan, C.; Feng, H. Positive effects of species mixing on biodiversity of understory plant communities and soil health in forest plantations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2418090122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  326. Ureña-Lara, C.; Pérez-Corona, M.E.; Delgado, J.A.; de las Heras, P.; Jiménez, M.D.; Andivia, E. Tree species identity rather than species mixing modulates soil organic carbon stocks and respiration in Mediterranean mountain forests. Plant Soil, 2025; early access. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Gautam, K.; Kumar, N.; Ram, A.; Dev, I.; Choudhury, B.U.; Singh, N.R.; Handa, A.K.; Yadav, A.; Anuragi, H.; Uthappa, A. Root architecture and carbon sequestration potential of fast-growing agroforestry tree species in semi-arid Central India. Front. Agron. 2025, 7, 1597122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Vasić, F.; Belanović-Simić, S.; Beloica, J.; Čavlović, D.; Kaňa, J.; Paul, C.; Donmez, C.; Jovanović, N.; Miljković, P. Soil Organic Carbon Stock (SOCS) in Eutrophic and Saline Ramsar Wetlands in Serbia. Water 2025, 18, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Chen, C.; Chen, H.Y.; Chen, X.; Huang, Z. Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Zhang, S.; Landuyt, D.; Verheyen, K.; De Frenne, P. Tree species mixing can amplify microclimate offsets in young forest plantations. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022, 59, 1428–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Mina, M.; Messier, C.; Duveneck, M.J.; Fortin, M.J.; Aquilué, N. Managing for the unexpected: Building resilient forest landscapes to cope with global change. Glob. Change Biol. 2022, 28, 4323–4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Bai, Y.-H.; Tang, Z. Enhanced effects of species richness on resistance and resilience of global tree growth to prolonged drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2410467121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Haberstroh, S.; Werner, C. The role of species interactions for forest resilience to drought. Plant Biol. 2022, 24, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Osuri, A.M.; Gopal, A.; Raman, T.S.; DeFries, R.; Cook-Patton, S.C.; Naeem, S. Greater stability of carbon capture in species-rich natural forests compared to species-poor plantations. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 034011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions.
Figure 1. The soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions.
Forests 17 00319 g001
Table 1. Effects of tree species on soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions in forest ecosystems.
Table 1. Effects of tree species on soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions in forest ecosystems.
Tree Species/Functional GroupSOC and Its Fraction ContentImpacted ComponentsReferences
Mixed forestsMAOC ↑, and POC ↑ (relative to younger forests or monocultures)forest age ↑, MAOC/SOC ↓, but soil depth ↑, MAOC ↑ (MAOC ↑ in deeper soils).[173]
Pinus tabuliformismicrobial necromass C (MNC)/MAOC ↓ (11.9%)
(relative to Quercus aliena at 20–40 cm depth)
total phosphorus, soil moisture, and texture, and cellulose content in litter.[185]
Quercus alienaMNC/MAOC ↑ (21.2%) (relative to Pinus tabuliformis at 20–40 cm depth)
Primary mixed broadleaved–Korean pine forest → secondary broadleaved forestfree POC 20.3% ↓ and aggregate-occluded POC 57.2% ↑ (relative to primary forest before conversion) litter and superior fine root quality ↑, C/N ratio ↓, SOC, and microbial biomass content ↑[159]
Primary mixed broadleaved–Korean pine forest → coniferous plantationFree POC 49.1% ↑, while aggregate-occluded POC 42.4% ↓ and MAOC 9.0% ↓ (relative to primary forest before conversion)litter and fine root quantity and quality ↓, SOC ↓, microbial biomass ↓, and microbial residue C ↓
Populus tomentosa (deciduous broadleaf)SOC ↑; MAOC ↑; MAOC/SOC ↑
(relative to Pinus tabuliformis in the same urban green space)
Fungal-dominated microbial communities ↑, C/P ↓, hydrolytic enzyme activities ↑, SOC accumulation, and MAOC ↑[186]
Pinus tabuliformis (evergreen conifer)SOC ↓ or NC; MAOC/SOC ↑ (site-dependent) (relative to Populus tomentosa in the same urban green space) oxidative enzyme activity ↑, organic matter oxidation ↑, and SOC ↓
Quercus wutaishanicaSOC:NC; POC:NC; MAOC:NC (relative to the same forest before N addition)microbial communities: NC to N addition, SOC fraction dynamics: NC[184]
Betula platyphyllaSOC:NC; POC:NC; MAOC ↑ (relative to the same forest before N addition and relative to Quercus wutaishanica)Microbial residues (amino sugars) ↑, microbial biomass, and enzymes: NC
mixed-species plantations (five-species mixtures)SOC ↑, MAOC ↑ (76.55%)
(relative to reference secondary forest and relative to monoculture and two-species mixture plantations)
Diverse necromass inputs, organo-mineral interactions ↑, available N ↑, bacterial + fungal necromass ↑[187]
Pure coniferous plantation → coniferous–broadleaf mixed forestPOC ↑ (80.2%–169.8%) (relative to pure coniferous plantation before conversion) physically protected by macroaggregates and Fe oxides ↑[188]
MAOC ↑ (41.1%–137.3%) (relative to pure coniferous plantation before conversion)microaggregate formation ↑ and long-term SOC stabilization ↑
Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) Stable SOC ↑ (relative to conifers in the same site)Root–microbe–soil (rhizosphere) interactions[189]
ConifersLabile SOC ↑ (relative to Populus tremuloides in the same site)Root detritus inputs
ConifersSOC stock 44% ↑ (relative to broadleaved species)litter C ↑[190]
BroadleavedSOC 44% ↓ (relative to conifers)litter C ↑
AM-associated SOC stock 39% ↓ (relative to ECM-associated species)litter decomposition ↑
ECM-associatedSOC stock 39% ↑ (relative to AM-associated species)litter decomposition ↓
Mixed broadleaved forests (3–5 species)MAOC ↑, SOC pools ↑ (relative to monospecific forests)Tree species diversity and fine root biomass and turnover ↑[191]
Juniperus excelsa (Juniper), Cedrus libani (Cedar), Abies cilicica (Fir)Total SOC ↑, PC ↑, C Management Index (CMI) ↑ (mostly under Juniper, Cedar, Fir relative to oak and shrubby land)Species-specific rhizosphere effects[97]
Quercus L. (Oak)Labile SOC ↑ (relative to Juniper, Cedar, Fir, and shrubby land)
Pinus brutiaSOC 22% ↑ AC ↑, PC ↑, SOC lability ↓ (relative to Quercus coccifera)Species-specific rhizosphere effects[5]
Quercus cocciferaAC ↑, PC ↑, SOC lability NC (relative to deforested shrubby land)
Deforested shrubby landSOC ↓-AC ↓, PC ↓, SOC lability ↑ (relative to both Pinus brutia and Quercus coccifera forests)SOC ↓, PC:AC ↓
Deciduous broadleavedStable SOC stock ↑ (relative to pre-afforestation or shrubby land)Consistent SOC ↑ after afforestation; strong performance on grasslands[192]
Sempervirent broadleaved SOC stock ↓ (young trees) (relative to stand age)Initial SOC ↓ following afforestation
SOC stock ↑ (mature trees) (relative to stand age)SOC ↑ (~20 years after afforestation)
Sempervirent conifer SOC stocks ↓ (low rate) (relative to pre-afforestation or baseline soil)Lowest SOC stock change among species groups
Note. Increase = ↑, decrease = ↓, NC = no detectable change, conversion = →.
Table 2. Tree species effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) stabilization pathways in forest ecosystems.
Table 2. Tree species effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) stabilization pathways in forest ecosystems.
Tree Species/Functional GroupSOC StabilizationAffected ComponentsLocationReferences
Secondary forest (Inceptisols)SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to pasture)Sorption of organic C to clay minerals ↑ Ecuador[212]
Secondary forest (Andisols)SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to pasture)Formation of metal–humus complexes and allophane
Early succession (Lespedeza bicolor)SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to late succession, Quercus liaotungensis)Macroaggregate formation ↑; C transfer ↑ (rapid)China[213]
Late succession (Quercus liaotungensis)SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to early succession, Lespedeza bicolor)C occlusion in silt and clay within aggregates (root–microbe-mediated)
Leucaena leucocephala (most effective afforested species, 20 years)SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to other afforested species)Physical protection in heavy fraction (<0.25 mm) and moderate biochemical recalcitrant CChina[214]
Primary natural broadleaf → secondary and plantation forestsSOC stabilization ↓ (relative to primary natural broadleaf forests)Macroaggregate-associated SOC ↓ + tree biomass (litter and root) ↓ and Fe/Al oxide concentration ↓China[215]
Norway spruce SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to mixed forest)Litterfall accumulation in the forest floorCzech
Republic
[216]
European beechSOC stabilization ↑ (moderate) (relative to Norway spruce)Root-derived C inputs to mineral soil
Mixed forest (Norway spruce + European beech)SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to monocultures of Norway spruce and European beech)Litterfall and root turnover complementarity (root-driven stabilization)
Temperate forest SOC stabilization ↓ (high microbial activity reduces MAOC)Litter (high-quality) ↑ + microbial growth ↑, SOC decomposition rate ↑United States[217]
Pinus brutiaSOC stabilization ↑ (relative to non-forest soils in the region)Protection of SOC by micro-aggregate (<2 mm)Türkiye[1]
Quercus cocciferaSOC stabilization ↑ (relative to non-forest soils in the region) High protection of SOC by fine-aggregates (0.25–0.05 mm)
Pinus tabulaeformis and Forsythia suspensaSOC stabilization ↑ (relative to P. tabulaeformis monoculture)Bacterial necromass-driven MAOC ↑China[218]
Pinus tabulaeformis and Quercus wutaishanicaSOC stabilization ↑ (relative to P. tabulaeformis monoculture) Fungal necromass-driven POC ↑
Forest (mature)SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to grassland)Microbial activity ↑; Ca-mediated stabilization ↓Russia[219]
Grassland (climax)SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to forest)Organo-mineral interactions ↑; Ca-bound humic acids ↑
Cunninghamia lanceolata plantationsSOC stabilization: NC (relative to untreated control)Microbial–enzyme interactions in litter and soil; smoke effects on C cyclingChina[220]
Shorea robusta (no/low disturbance (ND/LD))SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to HD forest)litterfall and root-derived C inputs ↑ and soil nutrients ↑India[221]
Shorea robusta (moderate disturbance (MD)) SOC stabilization ↑ (relative to HD forest)biomass ↑ > other disturbance regimes
Shorea robusta (highly disturbed (HD)) SOC stabilization ↓ (relative to ND/LD and MD forest)soil nutrients ↓ and erosion risk ↑
Populus euphratica (native) (1), Eucalyptus camaldulensis (introduced) (2), Prosopis juliflora (introduced) (3), Tamarix ramosissima (native) (4), open area (no vegetation) (5)SOC stabilization ↑ (High to very low) in1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 5SOM ↑, SOC sequestration↑, bulk density ↓ (in 5 ↑)
SOC sequestration in 1 (9.08 t ha−1) > 2 (8.37 t ha−1) > 3 (5.20 t ha−1) > 4 (2.93 t ha−1) > 5 (1.33 t ha−1)
Iran[222]
Alnus glutinosa (1), Carpinus betulus- Acer velutinum (2), Populus deltoides (3), Cupressus sempervirens, var. horizontalis (4), Degraded land (5)SOC stabilization ↑ (High to very low) in 1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 5Litter quality ↑, soil N, P, K, SOC ↑, microbial biomass ↑, enzyme activity ↑
In contrast to non-native species and poor degraded land, Alnus glutinosa showed the highest SOC stabilization↑ due to N fixation ↑ and litter decomposition rate ↑, and soil recovery after 25 years
Iran[223]
Note. Increase = ↑, decrease = ↓, NC = no detectable change, conversion = →, > = greater than.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Razzaghi, S. The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics. Forests 2026, 17, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319

AMA Style

Razzaghi S. The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics. Forests. 2026; 17(3):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Razzaghi, Somayyeh. 2026. "The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics" Forests 17, no. 3: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319

APA Style

Razzaghi, S. (2026). The Hidden Role of Forest Tree Species in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics. Forests, 17(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030319

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop