Next Article in Journal
Effect of Waste Glass Incorporation Methods on the Physical, Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Cementitious Binders
Next Article in Special Issue
Synergistic Sn-Induced Band Convergence in Mn-Doped p-Type PbTe Enables High Thermoelectric Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Waste Glass-Derived Hierarchically Porous All-Inorganic Coatings for Sustainable Daytime Radiative Cooling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermoelectric Nanocomposites and Segmented Single-Leg Device Based on GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3

by
Lawrence Yongo Methodius Emiliano
1,
Yilin Jiang
1,
Hua-Lu Zhuang
1,
Hezhang Li
1,
Chen Chen
1,
Su-Wei Zhang
1,
Yuzuru Miyazaki
2 and
Jing-Feng Li
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of New Ceramic Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2
Department of Applied Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(7), 1345; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071345
Submission received: 18 February 2026 / Revised: 17 March 2026 / Accepted: 24 March 2026 / Published: 28 March 2026

Abstract

Thermoelectric (TE) materials offer a promising route for direct thermal-to-electrical energy conversion via the Seebeck effect. Among them, GeTe exhibits superior performance in the mid-temperature range (500–800 K), whereas (Bi,Sb)2Te3 is widely regarded as the benchmark material for near low-temperature applications (< 450 K). To improve TE efficiency over a wider temperature range, segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3-based single-leg TE devices were developed. Specifically, based on nanocomposite technology, B4C and SiC nanoparticles were, respectively, introduced into GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3, achieving optimization of electrical conductivity alongside reduction in thermal conductivity, thereby enhancing the thermoelectric figure of merit (ZT). Finite element simulations were used to optimize the geometric structure of the segmented device, determining the ideal ratio of GeTe to (Bi,Sb)2Te3. The simulations predicted a maximum conversion efficiency (ηmax) of 16.9% when the ratio of GeTe to (Bi,Sb)2Te3 was 0.24, with a power density of 18.5 mW/mm2. Experimentally, the fabricated segmented device attained a peak conversion efficiency of 7.14% and a power density of 12.5 mW/mm2 under a hot-side temperature of 773 K. These findings confirm that strategic segmentation, combined with nanoscale phonon scattering engineering, substantially improves overall TE device performance across broad temperature range, underscoring its potential for high-efficiency thermoelectric energy conversion systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Thermoelectric (TE) materials, known for enabling direct conversion of heat into electricity and vice versa, have attracted significant interest in recent years due to their potential for sustainable energy solutions, including power generation and solid-state cooling [1]. TE technology, along with solid-state devices that exploit TE effect, offers several advantages, including having no moving parts or refrigerants, coupled with high reliability and scalability, marking a substantial improvement over conventional methods [2]. The technology has thus sparked global interest across various sectors, including applications such as waste heat recovery and harnessing solar thermal energy, portable picnic coolers, and thermal management in microprocessors [3,4].
For a TE device, the maximum efficiency (ηmax) in converting thermal energy to electrical energy is determined by both the Carnot efficiency, operating temperatures, and the TE material’s dimensionless figure of merit (ZT) [5], given by the equation:
η m a x = T h T c   1 + Z T h + T c 2   1 T h   1 + Z T h + T c 2 + T c T h
where Th is the hot-side temperature, Tc is the cold-side temperature, and Z(Th + Tc)/2 is the average TE figure of merit. The performance of TE device is dominated by ZT, which is defined as: ZT = σ·S2T/κtot where S is the Seebeck coefficient, σ is the electrical conductivity, κtot is the total thermal conductivity, T is the absolute temperature and the product (σ·S2), is the power factor (PF) [6]. Moreover, the total thermal conductivity, (κtot), is composed of the lattice thermal conductivity (κlat) and the electronic thermal conductivity (κele). To improve the efficiency of TE devices, i.e., maximize its ZT, it is essential to increase the PF while simultaneously decreasing the κlat. Independently manipulating these three variables (σ, S, κtot) is a crucial strategy to achieving a higher ZT [6].
Recent progress in the field of TE materials research has been substantial, driven by the development of innovative processes and novel concepts. A set of newly discovered TE materials has demonstrated excellent TE performance [7,8,9,10,11]. Currently, the most advanced TE materials are studied for their capabilities in power generation applications and have demonstrated high TE performance, including Bi2Te3, half-Heusler, GeTe, PbTe, and others [12,13,14,15,16,17].
Studies on (Bi,Sb)2Te3-based TE materials have achieved ZT values from 1.4 to 1.6 at near room-temperatures (300–500 K) through the strategic manipulation of point defects and dislocation engineering [18,19,20,21]. Furthermore, research into selenium-free n-type solid solutions of Bi2−xSbxTe3 has demonstrated the feasibility of achieving competitive properties using a two-step process of mechanical alloying (MA) followed by SPS, which facilitates the precise control of stoichiometry and microstructure [22]. Similarly, for GeTe-based alloys, optimizing carrier concentration and reducing lattice thermal conductivity has allowed ZT values to reach 1.8 to 2.0 or higher [23,24]. For instance, Jiang, Y et al. achieved a maximum ZT > 2.3 at 648 K for a lead-free GeTe-based Bi0.07Ge0.90Te compound, synthesized using MA combined SPS [25].
Numerous materials incorporating nanoparticles have demonstrated excellent performance due to intensified carrier and phonon scattering [26]. Wu et al. enhanced p-type Bi0.42Sb1.58Te3 by incorporating Ag5SbSe4, resulting in a peak ZT of 1.40 and a conversion efficiency of 6.5% at ΔT = 200 K [27]. Additionally, Li et al. introduced superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles into a p-type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 matrix, yielding a 32% improvement in ZT (1.5 at 340 K) by simultaneously enhancing the Seebeck coefficient and reducing thermal conductivity [28]. Building on these principles, the current study utilizes B4C and SiC nanoparticles to achieve synergistic modulation of transport properties. B4C is employed because the thermal mismatch between the boron-based particles and the matrix induces high-density dislocations that effectively scatter mid-frequency phonons, significantly reducing lattice thermal conductivity [29]. Furthermore, the introduction of SiC as a secondary phase is highly effective for decoupling interdependent TE parameters; its high-temperature stability and ability to form dense nanostructured grain boundaries facilitate intensified phonon scattering without severely compromising carrier mobility [30]. This success in nanocomposite engineering inspired the current study to further enhance the TE performance of GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3 through the targeted introduction of nanoparticles.
Several TE devices utilizing GeTe-based materials have been developed with favorable efficiencies [31,32,33]. For example, Jia et al. reported a maximum conversion efficiency (ηmax) of 11.8% for a GeTe single-leg device at ΔT = 422 K [34]. To bridge the efficiency gap across wider temperature range, segmented architectures are employed. Pei et al. fabricated a segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 single-leg device, achieving ηmax = 9.5% and a power density of ≈7.45 mWmm−2 [35]. Furthermore, Cao et al. reported a record ηmax = 13.6% in a Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3/Ge0.9Sb0.1Te segmented single-leg device at ΔT = 450 K [36]. While the peak efficiency in this work is lower than these benchmarks, our study demonstrates a competitive output power density and introduces a more scalable one-step consolidation process using B4C and SiC nanocomposites to maintain performance over broad thermal gradients.
The metallization layer is a critical factor in the fabrication of these segmented devices, as it minimizes contact resistance and ensures mechanical integrity [37]. This reliability is paramount for practical applications, as chemical reaction and atomic diffusion at elevated temperatures are primary factors in device failure. Fe, Ni, and Ti are commonly utilized; specifically, Ni is a standard metallization layer for (Bi,Sb)2Te3 due to its low contact resistance (<1 µΩ∙cm2) and high bonding strength (~30 MPa) [37]. Beyond individual metals, advanced engineering roadmaps now utilize density functional theory (DFT) to screen for reliable semimetallic interface materials that suppress diffusion and match thermal expansion coefficients [38]. Furthermore, transition metal silicides like FeSi have been demonstrated as potent barrier layers that can be integrated via a one-step consolidation process to achieve low contact resistivities (~20 µΩ∙cm2) and stable conversion efficiencies [39]. For GeTe segments, Ti is preferred as an effective metallization layer due to its compatible linear expansivity (10.80 × 10−6 K−1), low contact resistance (3 μΩ cm2), and minimal diffusion layer thickness (0.4 µm) [32]. The strategic combination of these optimized nanocomposites into a segmented single-leg device allows for the effective utilization of material strengths across a broad thermal gradient.
This study leverages the high performance of GeTe- and (Bi,Sb)2Te3-based nanocomposites to fabricate a segmented single-leg thermoelectric device optimized for operation across a broad temperature range. By incorporating 0.6 wt.% B4C and 0.4 vol.% SiC as reinforcing nanoparticles, p-type Bi0.05Ge0.99Te and Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 achieved peak ZT values of 2.2 at 723 K and 1.3 at 348 K, respectively. To translate these material-level advances into device-level performance, finite element analysis was employed to optimize the device geometry, establishing a segment cross-sectional area ratio of 0.24. The p-type segments were joined using a specialized metallization layer and consolidated via a one-step spark plasma sintering (SPS) process. While simulations predicted a maximum conversion efficiency (ηmax) of 16.9%, the fabricated device experimentally achieved a peak ηmax of 7.14% and a power density of 12.5 mW/mm2 at a hot-side temperature of 773 K. These results validate the synergy between nanocomposite engineering and strategic segmentation for efficient thermoelectric energy conversion.
The primary novelty of this work lies in the synergistic application of distinct nanoparticle reinforcements, B4C and SiC to independently optimize the thermoelectric performance of the mid-temperature (GeTe) and low-temperature ((Bi,Sb)2Te3) segments, respectively. Unlike previous reports on segmented devices that have primarily focused on stoichiometric tuning, our approach employs dual-nanocomposite engineering to achieve record peak ZT values of 2.2 in GeTe and 1.3 in (Bi,Sb)2Te3 within a single integrated device architecture. Furthermore, this study establishes a comprehensive materials-to-device framework that integrates three-dimensional finite element simulation for geometric optimization with a streamlined one-step SPS fabrication process. This integrated strategy not only yields a robust segmented single-leg device with a competitive power density of 12.5 mW/mm2 but also demonstrates a practical and scalable pathway for high-performance waste heat recovery applications.

2. Materials and Methods

Nanocomposite materials with the nominal compositions Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + x wt.% B4C (x = 0, 0.1, 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0) and Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + x vol.% SiC (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8) were synthesized via a two-step process comprising mechanical alloying (MA) and spark plasma sintering (SPS). High-purity elemental powders of Ge (99.999%, Zhongnuo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), Te (99.999%, Zhongnuo New Materials Technology Co., Ltd.), Bi (99.99%, Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), Sb (99.99%, Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.), B4C (99%, Aladdin Industrial Corporation Co., Ltd.), and SiC (99%, Beijing Jinming Biotechnolgy Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) served as starting materials. The main properties of the raw materials are summarized in the (Table S1). For the GeTe-based alloys, MA was conducted in a tungsten carbide milling jar to withstand the inherent hardness of Ge, whereas a hardened stainless-steel vial and ball set were employed for the (Bi,Sb)2Te3 series.
The MA process was executed using a planetary ball mill at rotation speeds of 450 rpm for 12 h (GeTe) and 480 rpm for 6 h ((Bi,Sb)2Te3). To prevent oxidation, milling was performed under a protective atmosphere of 95 vol.% Ar and 5 vol.% H2. The resulting precursor powders were consolidated into dense bulk specimens using an SPS system (Graphite die: ϕ 12 mm × 5 mm). GeTe-based samples were sintered at 723 K for 5 min under 60 MPa of axial pressure, while (Bi,Sb)2Te3-based samples were processed at 673 K for 5 min under 50 MPa. The thermoelectric properties and segmented device performance reported in this study are based on the characterization of a representative single sample for each composition and a single-leg device.
The Seebeck coefficient (S) and electrical resistivity (ρ) were measured simultaneously using a ZEM-3 system (Ulvac-Riko, Yokohama, Japan) on rectangular specimens (2.5 mm × 2.5 mm × 9 mm3) for GeTe; (2 mm × 2 mm × 8 mm3) for (Bi,Sb)2Te3 over their respective temperature range of 300–723 K and 300–473 K. Thermal conductivity (κ) was determined through the relation κ = DCPd, where D is the thermal diffusivity, CP is the specific heat capacity, and d is the density. Diffusivity was measured on ϕ 6 mm × 1 mm disks using the laser flash method (LFA 457, NETZSCH, Selb, Germany). CP was estimated via the Dulong-Petit limit, and density was measured using Archimedes’ method.
Microstructural analysis and diffusion layer investigations were performed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Zeiss Merlin, Oberkochen, Germany), Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The performance of the integrated segmented device, including output voltage (U), output power (P), and cooling capacity(QC), was evaluated using a Mini-PEM system (Advance Riko, Yokohama, Japan). Energy conversion efficiency (η) was calculated as η = P/(P + QC) × 100%. The segmented device’s ideal performance was simulated using high-fidelity 3D finite element modeling (COMSOL Multiphysics 5.4). The 3D finite element simulations were performed by using the experimentally measured temperature-dependent transport properties of the GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3 nanocomposites as the governing material inputs. The simulation model assumes steady-state heat flow and ideal thermal/electrical insulation at the boundaries. At a hot-side temperature, the model predicted an optimal power density that follows the same parabolic trend as our experimental measurements.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the microstructural and phase characterization of Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + x wt.% B4C (x = 0, 0.1, 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0) nanocomposites. Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA) was utilized to evaluate the elemental homogeneity of the matrix both with and without B4C nanoparticles (NPs) incorporation. The pristine Bi0.05Ge0.99Te sample (Figure 1a) shows a uniform distribution of Bi, Ge, and Te. However, minor dark regions visible in the backscattered electron micrograph correspond to areas with a low characteristic X-ray signal intensity. This reduced signal is most likely caused by surface topography, as local height variations can affect X-ray emission and detection. Upon the addition of 0.6 wt.% B4C (Figure 1b), the matrix stoichiometry remains stable, while elemental mapping of Boron (B) and Carbon (C) confirms the presence of the secondary phase. While B4C NPs are generally dispersed, some regional concentration variations are observed, likely arising from mechanical processing constraints during synthesis. Chemical composition and elemental distribution were analyzed using Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) via surface area mapping and point analysis mode. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns shown in Figure 1c confirm that all samples are monophasic and index well to the rhombohedral GeTe structure (R3m, PDF#82-8422). No secondary impurity phases were detected, indicating high phase purity across all compositions. Notably, the primary diffraction peaks exhibit slight broadening and a decrease in intensity as B4C NPs content increases, which is indicative of grain refinement and strain-induced lattice distortion caused by the NPs inclusions. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images further reveal the fracture surfaces of the pristine (Figure 1d) and 0.6 wt.% B4C-reinforced (Figure 1e) samples. The pristine matrix displays a dense, polycrystalline morphology with clear grain boundaries. The 0.6 wt.% B4C nanocomposite retains this fundamental framework; however, the presence of B4C NPs at the grain boundaries appears to inhibit grain growth, correlating with the peak broadening observed in the XRD data.
Figure 2 shows the temperature-dependent TE transport properties for the Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + x wt.% B4C (x = 0, 0.1, 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0) nanocomposites. The introduction of B4C NPs significantly modulates the electronic transport of the Bi0.05Ge0.99Te matrix. As shown in Figure 2a,c, the 0.6 wt.% B4C composition exhibits the highest electrical conductivity and resulting power factor, identifying it as the optimal concentration for enhanced electronic performance. All samples display degenerate semiconductor behavior, characterized by a decrease in σ with increasing temperature up to approximately 600 K (Figure 2a). Conversely, the Seebeck coefficient (S) remains largely unaffected or shows a slight enhancement. This behavior is consistent with the energy filtering effect, where the potential barriers created by the B4C secondary phase preferentially scatter low-energy carriers, thereby preserving the overall thermopower. Regarding thermal transport, the lattice thermal conductivity decreases with increasing B4C content, reaching a minimum value in the 0.6 wt.% B4C sample (Figure 2e). This significant reduction in κlat is attributed to intensified phonon scattering at B4C/matrix interfaces. The results demonstrate that the strategic dispersion of B4C nanoparticles simultaneously improves electrical transport while suppressing thermal conduction. Consequently, Compared to recent reports on GeTe systems, such as the Ge-vacancy suppression reported by Jia et al. and the segmented modules by Pei et al., our B4C-reinforced nanocomposites 0.6 wt.% B4C exhibit a peak power factor of 48 μW cm−1K−2 (Figure 2c) and a superior peak ZT of 2.2 at 723 K (Figure 2f), underscoring the effectiveness of the nanocomposite strategy in decoupling electronic and thermal transport.
The selection of nanoparticle concentrations was informed by preliminary optimization trials. While higher concentrations (above 1.0 wt.% B4C) were found to trigger particle agglomeration and a subsequent decrease in the power factor due to excessive carrier scattering, the current loading levels maximize phonon scattering without compromising electronic transport. This concentration serves as the reinforcement limit for maintaining optimal dispersion in these specific matrix systems. As a results, the Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + 0.6 wt.% B4C nanocomposite was selected as the medium-high temperature segment for the fabrication of the integrated segmented TE single leg device. To validate the reproducibility of these results, we provided a comparison in the (Figure S1) showing the average ZT (ZTave) across multiple synthesized batches. Additionally, the measurement uncertainty for ZT and conversion efficiency is estimated at 7% and 10%, respectively, consistent with international standards for thermoelectric characterization.
Figure 3 presents the microstructural and phase analysis of Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + x vol.% SiC (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8) nanocomposites. Among the various (Bi,Sb)2Te3 nanocomposites, the 0.4 vol.% SiC sample was selected as the representative optimal composition for detailed microstructural and device-level analysis. In the pristine Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 sample (Figure 3a), mapping reveals a largely uniform distribution of Bi, Sb, and Te, although minor dark regions suggest subtle localized compositional fluctuations. For the 0.4 vol.% SiC-reinforced nanocomposite (Figure 3b), elemental mapping of Silicon (Si) and Carbon (C) confirms the successful integration of SiC NPs while the host matrix maintains its stoichiometric uniformity. All major diffraction peaks can be indexed to the rhombohedral phase (R3m), which is essentially consistent with the standard card PDF#72-1836 (Figure 3c), and no distinct second-phase diffraction peaks were detected. With increasing SiC content, the diffraction peaks show progressive broadening, primarily attributable to grain refinement. Meanwhile, the observed slight peak shifts toward higher angles indicate a change in lattice parameter, likely resulting from lattice strain induced by the incorporated SiC nanoparticles. These structural modifications, specifically the refined grain structure and induced lattice distortions are anticipated to enhance phonon scattering, thereby suppressing thermal conductivity without compromising electronic transport. SEM images further reveal the fracture surface morphology of the pristine (Figure 3d) and 0.4 vol.% SiC (Figure 3e) samples. The pristine matrix exhibits a characteristic dense, polycrystalline morphology with irregularly shaped grains. The 0.4 vol.% SiC nanocomposite preserves this fundamental granular framework, indicating that the incorporation of SiC at this concentration maintains the structural integrity of the host matrix while providing the necessary interfaces for thermal transport modulation. As revealed by the microstructural analysis, the grain boundaries and strain fields introduced by SiC effectively enhance phonon scattering, leading to a substantial reduction in lattice thermal conductivity (see Figure 4e). Meanwhile, owing to the well-dispersed SiC nanoparticles in the matrix and their relatively low concentration, the obstruction to carrier transport pathways is limited, thereby preserving electrical conductivity (see Figure 4a) and ultimately synergistically improving the ZT value.
Figure 4 shows the temperature dependent TE transport properties of Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + x vol.% SiC (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8) nanocomposites. As shown in Figure 4a, the electrical conductivity of all samples decreases with increasing temperature in the range of 300–500 K, exhibiting typical metallic behavior of degenerate semiconductors. The Seebeck coefficient undergoes systematic variations with composition and temperature (Figure 4b), indicating that the incorporation of SiC nanoparticles effectively modulates the carrier transport characteristics of the material. The power factor reaches its peak near the temperature range of 350–400 K (Figure 4c). Among them, the 0.4 vol.% SiC sample maintains the optimal PF value across the entire tested temperature range, reflecting a good synergy between electrical conductivity and the Seebeck coefficient. Regarding thermal transport, κlat of the 0.4 vol.% SiC composite is most effectively suppressed (Figure 4e), which is mainly attributed to the enhanced multiscale phonon scattering jointly caused by the heterogeneous interfaces, grain refinement, and lattice strain introduced by SiC nanoparticles (see Figure 3). Higher SiC content leads to increased lattice thermal conductivity; as shown in Figure 4e, lattice thermal conductivity increased at concentrations of 0.6 and 0.8 vol.% SiC. Benefiting from the optimized electrical properties and significant reduction in thermal conductivity, the 0.4 vol.% SiC sample achieves the highest ZT, peaking at 1.3 at 348 K (Figure 4f). A comparison showing the average ZT (ZTave) across multiple synthesized batches of (Bi,Sb)2Te3 nanocomposites is shown in the (Table S2). Based on its optimal and stable ZT value, this composition (Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + 0.4 vol.% SiC) was selected as the near room temperature segment material for subsequent segmented single-leg TE device. The (Bi,Sb)2Te3 nanocomposite is expected to possess superior mechanical properties, which may enhance the structural robustness of the device [40].
Figure 5 presents SEM micrographs and corresponding EDS elemental mapping for the various interfaces within the fabricated segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 single-leg TE device. The analysis focuses on three critical transition regions: the Cu/Ti/GeTe junction (Figure 5a), the GeTe/Ti/Ni/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 segmentation interface (Figure 5b), and the (Bi,Sb)2Te3/Ni/Cu contact (Figure 5c). EDS mapping results demonstrate highly uniform elemental distributions of Cu, Ti, Ni, Ge, Bi, Sb, and Te across the respective junctions. Specifically, the Ti layer serves as an effective diffusion barrier between the Cu electrode and the GeTe-based segment, while the Ni layer provides chemical stability at the (Bi,Sb)2Te3 interface. The preservation of these sharp interfaces is essential for maintaining structural integrity and minimizing both parasitic thermal and electrical contact resistances. A schematic illustration of the final integrated device is shown in Figure 5d, detailing the layer-by-layer architecture of the metallization stacks and the active nanocomposites. The segmented single-leg device was fabricated using a one-step Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) technique to ensure robust interfacial bonding. Initially, a thick Cu layer to serve as the hot-side electrode contact was placed at the bottom of a 10 mm diameter graphite die to serve as the hot-side electrode contact, followed by Ti layer. The GeTe nanocomposite powder was then loaded, followed by a dual-layer Ti/Ni interface layers to prevent interdiffusion between the segments. Subsequently, the (Bi,Sb)2Te3 nanocomposite powder was added, followed by Ni layer then topped with a final Cu layer for the cold-side electrode contact. The thickness of the metallization layer and Cu layer is ≈100 µm. The entire assembly was sintered at 723 K under a uniaxial pressure of 50 MPa for 5 min. The fabricated single-leg device, measuring 9 mm × 5.5 mm × 3.5 mm, incorporates p-type Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + 0.6 wt.% B4C and Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + 0.4 vol.% SiC nanocomposites as the medium-high and low-temperature segments, respectively. The photograph of fabricated segmented single-leg device is shown (Figure S3). This strategic material integration leverages the high peak ZT values of both segments to maximize efficiency across the entire operating temperature gradient.
Figure 6 presents the TE performance of the segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 single-leg device. Finite element simulations were performed to optimize the device configuration under a temperature gradient of Th = 723 K and Tc = 303 K. These simulations targeted the synergy between the high-ZT regimes of GeTe-based nanocomposites (500–700 K) and (Bi,Sb)2Te3-based nanocomposites (300–450 K) by adjusting the segment length ratio (1 − x). Numerical contour maps indicate a maximum power density (Pd,max) of 18.5 mW/mm2 at x = 0.14 and I = 7.2 A (Figure 6a), while the peak conversion efficiency (ηmax) of 16.9% was identified at x = 0.24 and I = 5.2 A (Figure 6b). Consequently, a ratio of x = 0.24 was selected as the optimal geometric design to maximize efficiency. The performance of the fabricated segmented device was evaluated across a hot-side temperature range of 373–773 K with the cold side maintained at 303 K. As shown in Figure 6c, the experimental power density (Pd) reached 9.81 mW/mm2 at 723 K and peaked at 12.5 mW/mm2 at 773 K. The achieved power density of (12.5 mW/mm2) suggests that these segmented devices could provide a lightweight and efficient solution for recovering waste heat from automotive exhaust systems, where space is a critical constraint. The measured conversion efficiency (η) exhibited a significant increase with rising Th, improving from 2.41% at 373 K to a maximum of 7.14% at 773 K (Figure 6d). The observed shift in peak efficiency toward higher current values at elevated temperatures aligns well with theoretical predictions.
The observed discrepancy between the simulated ηmax (16.9%) and experimental value (7.14%) is primarily attributed to parasitic resistances at the device’s internal interfaces. The simulation model assumes near-zero contact resistance; however, in practice, the multiple junctions (detailed in Figure 5d) introduce cumulative electrical and thermal contact resistances. Specifically, the Ti barrier layer, while effective at suppressing diffusion, contributes to a measurable voltage drop, while the Ni interface at the (Bi,Sb)2Te3 segment adds thermal boundary resistance that diminishes the actual ΔT experienced by the nanocomposite material. Furthermore, heat radiation and conduction losses through the measurement probes in the experimental setup further degrade efficiency. These results successfully validate the segmented design strategy, demonstrating the device’s potential for high-efficiency energy harvesting in high temperature applications.

4. Conclusions

This study successfully demonstrated the fabrication of segmented single-leg device based on the enhanced TE performance of GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3 nanocomposites. By strategically incorporating B4C into GeTe and SiC into (Bi,Sb)2Te3 matrices, lattice thermal conductivity was effectively suppressed through enhanced phonon scattering while maintaining favorable electronic transport, resulting in peak ZT values of 2.2 (723 K) and 1.3 (348 K), respectively. These material optimizations provided the foundation for a device architecture capable of maintaining high efficiency across a broad temperature range. Finite element simulations served as a critical framework for device optimization, identifying an ideal geometric segment ratio of 0.24. The experimental validation of the segmented single-leg device, fabricated via a one-step SPS process with effective integration of Ti and Ni metallization barriers, yielded a maximum conversion efficiency of 7.14% and a power density of 12.5 mW/mm2 at a hot-side temperature of 773 K. The observed discrepancy between the simulated efficiency (ηmax ≈ 16.9%) and the experimental value (ηmax ≈ 7.14%) arises from several unavoidable practical factors. First, the simulation assumes ideal ohmic contacts with zero resistance, whereas the experimental device involves finite electrical contact resistance at the multiple metallized interfaces, which contributes to internal power dissipation. Second, thermal parasitic losses due to radiative heat loss from the leg surfaces. Finally, although the one-step SPS process minimizes defects, minor interface imperfections and localized carrier scattering at the Ti/Ni barrier junctions can further impede performance. Future study should focus on the implementation of semi-metallic interface materials or silicide barriers, such as FeSi, which have demonstrated the potential to reduce contact resistivity to the µΩ∙cm2 level, thereby bridging the gap between theoretical potential and experimental output. This study establishes a robust pathway for the development of high-efficiency thermoelectric devices tailored for high-temperature waste heat recovery applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma19071345/s1, Figure S1: Average thermoelectric figure of merit (ZTave). (a) ZTave as s function of B4C content (wt.%) and (b) Comparison of ZT and ZTave as a function of B4C content (wt.%) for Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + x wt.% B4C nanocomposites (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0); Figure S2: Average thermoelectric figure of merit (ZTave). (a) ZTave as s function of SiC content (vol.%) and (b) Comparision of ZT and ZTave as a function of SiC content (vol.%) for Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + x vol.% SiC nanocomposites (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.5); Figure S3: Fabricated segmented single-leg device photograph; Table S1: Physicochemical and thermal properties of starting raw materials; Table S2: Comparison of this work with similar results reported in the literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-F.L.; Methodology, Y.J., H.-L.Z., H.L., C.C., S.-W.Z. and Y.M.; Formal analysis, Y.J., H.-L.Z., H.L. and C.C.; Investigation, L.Y.M.E.; Writing—original draft, L.Y.M.E. and J.-F.L.; Writing—review & editing, L.Y.M.E., Y.J., H.-L.Z., H.L., C.C. and J.-F.L.; Supervision, J.-F.L.; Funding acquisition, J.-F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFB3809402, 2025YFF0521002) and the Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Project at Southwest United Graduate School (202502A0070001) as well as Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Pro-gram via Tsinghua–Tohoku Collaborative Research Fund.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, X.; Chen, C.; Yin, L.; Wang, X.; Mao, J.; Cao, F.; Zhang, Q. Realizing an excellent conversion efficiency of 14.5% in the Mg3Sb2/GeTe-based thermoelectric module for waste heat recovery. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 6147–6154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, J.-F.; Liu, W.-S.; Zhao, L.-D.; Zhou, M. High-performance nanostructured thermoelectric materials. NPG Asia Mater. 2010, 2, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bell, L.E. Cooling, Heating, Generating Power, and Recovering Waste Heat with Thermoelectric Systems. Science 2008, 321, 1457–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, W.H.; Wang, C.M.; Lee, D.S.; Kwon, E.E.; Ashokkumar, V.; Culaba, A.B. Optimization design by evolutionary computation for minimizing thermal stress of a thermoelectric generator with varied numbers of square pin fins. Appl. Energy 2022, 314, 118995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, X.; Jood, P.; Ohta, M.; Kunii, M.; Nagase, K.; Nishiate, H.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Yamamoto, A. Power generation from nanostructured PbTe-based thermoelectrics: Comprehensive development from materials to modules. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vineis, C.J.; Shakouri, A.; Majumdar, A.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Nanostructured thermoelectrics: Big efficiency gains from small features. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3970–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qin, B.; Wang, D.; Liu, X.; Qin, Y.; Dong, J.F.; Luo, J.; Li, J.-W.; Liu, W.; Tan, G.; Tang, X.; et al. Power generation and thermoelectric cooling enabled by momentum and energy multiband alignments. Science 2021, 373, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Su, L.; Wang, D.; Wang, S.; Qin, B.; Wang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Jin, Y.; Chang, C.; Zhao, L.-D. High thermoelectric performance realized through manipulating layered phonon-electron decoupling. Science 2022, 375, 1385–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karthikeyan, V.; Surjadi, J.U.; Li, X.; Fan, R.; Theja, V.C.S.; Li, W.-J.; Lu, Y.; Roy, V.A.L. Three dimensional architected thermoelectric devices with high toughness and power conversion efficiency. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baig, N.; Kammakakam, I.; Falath, W.; Kammakakam, I. Nanomaterials: A review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 1821–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, H.; Shi, X.L.; Duan, J.; Liu, Q.; Chen, Z.G. Advances in Ag2Se-based thermoelectrics from materials to applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 1870–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meroz, O.; Gelbstein, Y. Thermoelectric Bi2Te3−xSex alloys for efficient thermal to electrical energy conversion. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 4092–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, H.; Li, W.; Nozariasbmarz, A.; Liu, N.; Zhang, Y.; Priya, S.; Poudel, B. Half-Heusler alloys as emerging high power density thermoelectric cooling materials. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, B.; Wang, W.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Xie, L.; Huang, M.; He, J. High figure-of-merit and power generation in high-entropy GeTe-based thermoelectrics. Science 2022, 377, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qiu, P.; Cheng, J.; Chai, J.; Du, X.; Xia, X.; Ming, C.; Zhu, C.; Yang, J.; Sun, Y.Y.; Xu, F.; et al. Exceptionally Heavy Doping Boosts the Performance of Iron Silicide for Refractory Thermoelectrics. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2200247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, H.T.; Sun, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Deng, Q.; Gan, L.; Lv, F.L.; Shi, X.L.; Chen, Z.G.; Ang, R. High-performance in n-type PbTe-based thermoelectric materials achieved by synergistically dynamic doping and energy filtering. Nano Energy 2022, 91, 106706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, J.W.; Jung, Y.K.; Walsh, A. Metal Halide Thermoelectrics: Prediction of High-Performance CsCu2I3. PRX Energy 2023, 2, 043004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pan, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Witting, I.; Zhang, L.; Fu, C.; Li, J.W.; Huang, Y.; Sun, F.H.; He, J.; Snyder, G.J.; et al. Synergistic modulation of mobility and thermal conductivity in (Bi,Sb)2Te3 towards high thermoelectric performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhuang, H.L.; Pei, J.; Cai, B.; Dong, J.; Hu, H.; Sun, F.H.; Pan, Y.; Snyder, G.J.; Li, J.-F. Thermoelectric Performance Enhancement in BiSbTe Alloy by Microstructure Modulation via Cyclic Spark Plasma Sintering with Liquid Phase. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, L.; Zhu, T.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X. Point defect engineering of high-performance bismuth-telluride-based thermoelectric materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 5211–5218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhuang, H.L.; Hu, H.; Pei, J.; Su, B.; Li, J.W.; Jiang, Y.; Han, Z.; Li, J.-F. High ZT in p-type thermoelectric (Bi,Sb)2Te3 with built-in nanopores. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 2039–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Galodé, A.; Barbier, T.; Gascoin, F. The Synthesis and Thermoelectric Properties of the n-Type Solid Solution Bi2−xSbxTe3 (x < 1). Materials 2023, 16, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dong, J.; Sun, F.H.; Tang, H.; Pei, J.; Zhuang, H.L.; Hu, H.H.; Zhang, B.P.; Pan, Y.; Li, J.-F. Medium-temperature thermoelectric GeTe: Vacancy suppression and band structure engineering leading to high performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, M.; Gao, Z.; Lou, Q.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, J.; Han, Z.; Fu, C.; Zhu, T. Achieving High Carrier Mobility and Thermal Stability in Plainified Rhombohedral GeTe Thermoelectric Materials with zT > 2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2307864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, Y.; Dong, J.; Zhuang, H.L.; Yu, J.; Su, B.; Li, H.; Pei, J.; Sun, F.H.; Zhou, M.; Hu, H.; et al. Evolution of defect structures leading to high ZT in GeTe-based thermoelectric materials. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, H.; Sun, F.H.; Dong, J.; Zhuang, H.L.; Cai, B.; Pei, J.; Li, J.-F. Nanostructure Engineering and Performance Enhancement in Fe2O3-Dispersed Cu12Sb4S13 Thermoelectric Composites with Earth-Abundant Elements. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 17852–17860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, G.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, Y.; Tan, X.; Noudem, J.G.; Zhang, Z.; Cui, C.; Sun, P.; Hu, H.; Wu, J.; et al. High-Efficiency Thermoelectric Module Based on High-Performance Bi0.42Sb1.58Te3 Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2305686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, C.; Ma, S.; Wei, P.; Zhu, W.; Nie, X.; Sang, X.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, W. Magnetism-induced huge enhancement of the room-temperature thermoelectric and cooling performance of p-type BiSbTe alloys. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, Y.; Su, B.; Yu, J.; Han, Z.; Hu, H.; Zhuang, H.L.; Li, H.; Dong, J.; Li, J.W.; Wang, C.; et al. Exceptional figure of merit achieved in boron-dispersed GeTe-based thermoelectric composites. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xing, Y.; Ren, B.; Li, B.; Chen, J.; Yin, S.; Lin, H.; Liu, J.; Chen, H. Principles and Methods for Improving the Thermoelectric Performance of SiC: A Potential High-Temperature Thermoelectric Material. Materials 2024, 17, 3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, J.; Zhao, S.; Chen, J.; Han, C.; Hu, L.; Liu, F.; Ao, W.; Li, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhang, C. Al-Si Alloy as a Diffusion Barrier for GeTe-Based Thermoelectric Legs with High Interfacial Reliability and Mechanical Strength. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 18562–18569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Shan, B.; Tang, J.; Liu, H.; Chen, Z.; Lin, S.; Li, W.; Pei, Y. Realizing a 14% single-leg thermoelectric efficiency in GeTe alloys. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bai, G.; Yu, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Xie, Y.; Hu, L.; Liu, F.; Wuttig, M.; Cojocaru-Mirédin, O.; Zhang, C. Boron Strengthened GeTe-Based Alloys for Robust Thermoelectric Devices with High Output Power Density. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2102012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jia, N.; Cao, J.; Tan, X.Y.; Zheng, J.; Chien, S.W.; Yang, L.; Chen, K.; Ng, H.K.; Faye Duran, S.S.; Liu, H.; et al. Suppressing Ge-vacancies to achieve high single-leg efficiency in GeTe with an ultra-high room temperature power factor. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 23335–23344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pei, J.; Shi, J.L.; Li, H.; Jiang, Y.; Dong, J.; Zhuang, H.L.; Cai, B.; Su, B.; Yu, J.; Zhou, W.; et al. Design and Fabrication of Segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 Thermoelectric Module with Enhanced Conversion Efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2214771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cao, J.; Tan, X.Y.; Jia, N.; Zheng, J.; Chien, S.W.; Ng, H.K.; Tan, C.K.I.; Liu, H.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, S.; et al. Designing good compatibility factor in segmented Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3—GeTe thermoelectrics for high power conversion efficiency. Nano Energy 2022, 96, 107147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Joshi, G.; Chen, G.; Ren, Z. Understanding of the contact of nanostructured thermoelectric n-type Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 legs for power generation applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 13093–13100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, X.; Liu, W. An engineering roadmap for the thermoelectric interface materials. J. Mater. 2024, 10, 748–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, S.; Huang, C.; Li, C.; Yang, L.; Chen, Z.; Sa, B.; Li, W.; Pei, Y. Thermal stability of FeSi as barrier layer in high-performance Mg2Si0.3Sn0.7 thermoelectric device. J. Mater. 2025, 11, 101044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, L.-D.; Zhang, B.-P.; Li, J.-F.; Zhou, M.; Liu, W.; Liu, J. Thermoelectric and mechanical properties of nano-SiC-dispersed Bi2Te3 fabricated by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering. J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 455, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microstructural and phase characterization of GeTe-based nanocomposites: (a,b) EPMA micrograph and EDS mapping of the polished surface of (a) Bi0.05Ge0.99Te and (b) Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + 0.6 wt.% B4C samples; (c) XRD patterns of Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + x wt.% B4C nanocomposites (x = 0, 0.1, 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0); (d,e) SEM micrographs of (d) Bi0.05Ge0.99Te and (e) Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + 0.6 wt.% B4C samples.
Figure 1. Microstructural and phase characterization of GeTe-based nanocomposites: (a,b) EPMA micrograph and EDS mapping of the polished surface of (a) Bi0.05Ge0.99Te and (b) Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + 0.6 wt.% B4C samples; (c) XRD patterns of Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + x wt.% B4C nanocomposites (x = 0, 0.1, 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0); (d,e) SEM micrographs of (d) Bi0.05Ge0.99Te and (e) Bi0.05Ge0.99Te + 0.6 wt.% B4C samples.
Materials 19 01345 g001
Figure 2. Temperature dependence of TE transport Properties value for GeTe-based nanocomposites: (a) Electrical conductivity, (b) Seebeck coefficient, (c) Power factor, (d) Total thermal conductivity, (e) Lattice thermal conductivity, (f) ZT.
Figure 2. Temperature dependence of TE transport Properties value for GeTe-based nanocomposites: (a) Electrical conductivity, (b) Seebeck coefficient, (c) Power factor, (d) Total thermal conductivity, (e) Lattice thermal conductivity, (f) ZT.
Materials 19 01345 g002
Figure 3. Microstructural characterization of (Bi,Sb)2Te3-based nanocomposites: (a,b) EPMA micrograph and EDS mapping of the polished surface of (a) Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 and (b) Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + 0.4 vol.% SiC samples. (c) XRD patterns of Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + x vol.% SiC nanocomposites (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8); (d,e) SEM micrographs of (d) Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 and (e) Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + 0.4 vol.% SiC samples.
Figure 3. Microstructural characterization of (Bi,Sb)2Te3-based nanocomposites: (a,b) EPMA micrograph and EDS mapping of the polished surface of (a) Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 and (b) Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + 0.4 vol.% SiC samples. (c) XRD patterns of Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + x vol.% SiC nanocomposites (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8); (d,e) SEM micrographs of (d) Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 and (e) Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 + 0.4 vol.% SiC samples.
Materials 19 01345 g003
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of TE transport Properties value for (Bi,Sb)2Te3-based nanocomposites: (a) Electrical conductivity, (b) Seebeck coefficient, (c) Power factor, (d) Total thermal conductivity, (e) Lattice thermal conductivity, (f) ZT.
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of TE transport Properties value for (Bi,Sb)2Te3-based nanocomposites: (a) Electrical conductivity, (b) Seebeck coefficient, (c) Power factor, (d) Total thermal conductivity, (e) Lattice thermal conductivity, (f) ZT.
Materials 19 01345 g004
Figure 5. SEM image and EDS mapping of segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 single-leg TE device at different interfaces. (a,a1,a2) Cu-Ti-GeTe; (b,b1,b2) GeTe-Ti-Ni(Bi,Sb)2Te3; (c,c1,c2) (Bi,Sb)2Te3-Ni-C; (d) Schematic diagram of the segmented single-leg device.
Figure 5. SEM image and EDS mapping of segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 single-leg TE device at different interfaces. (a,a1,a2) Cu-Ti-GeTe; (b,b1,b2) GeTe-Ti-Ni(Bi,Sb)2Te3; (c,c1,c2) (Bi,Sb)2Te3-Ni-C; (d) Schematic diagram of the segmented single-leg device.
Materials 19 01345 g005
Figure 6. TE performance of the segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 Single-leg TE device: (a,b) Simulated 3D surface plots of (a) power density (Pd) and (b) efficiency (η) versus current (I) and segment length ratio (x) at Th = 723 K and Tc = 303 K. (c,d) Measured (c) Pd and (d) η of the fabricated device from 373 K to 773 K. Insets in (d) show the fabricated device schematic and photograph.
Figure 6. TE performance of the segmented GeTe/(Bi,Sb)2Te3 Single-leg TE device: (a,b) Simulated 3D surface plots of (a) power density (Pd) and (b) efficiency (η) versus current (I) and segment length ratio (x) at Th = 723 K and Tc = 303 K. (c,d) Measured (c) Pd and (d) η of the fabricated device from 373 K to 773 K. Insets in (d) show the fabricated device schematic and photograph.
Materials 19 01345 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Emiliano, L.Y.M.; Jiang, Y.; Zhuang, H.-L.; Li, H.; Chen, C.; Zhang, S.-W.; Miyazaki, Y.; Li, J.-F. Thermoelectric Nanocomposites and Segmented Single-Leg Device Based on GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3. Materials 2026, 19, 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071345

AMA Style

Emiliano LYM, Jiang Y, Zhuang H-L, Li H, Chen C, Zhang S-W, Miyazaki Y, Li J-F. Thermoelectric Nanocomposites and Segmented Single-Leg Device Based on GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3. Materials. 2026; 19(7):1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Emiliano, Lawrence Yongo Methodius, Yilin Jiang, Hua-Lu Zhuang, Hezhang Li, Chen Chen, Su-Wei Zhang, Yuzuru Miyazaki, and Jing-Feng Li. 2026. "Thermoelectric Nanocomposites and Segmented Single-Leg Device Based on GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3" Materials 19, no. 7: 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071345

APA Style

Emiliano, L. Y. M., Jiang, Y., Zhuang, H.-L., Li, H., Chen, C., Zhang, S.-W., Miyazaki, Y., & Li, J.-F. (2026). Thermoelectric Nanocomposites and Segmented Single-Leg Device Based on GeTe and (Bi,Sb)2Te3. Materials, 19(7), 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop