Next Article in Journal
Bioash-Based Stabilization/Solidification for Heavy Metal(oid) Soil Remediation: A Case Study in Northern Sweden
Previous Article in Journal
Progress and Perspectives on Heat Transfer Design Optimization of Functionally Graded Materials Under Large Temperature Gradients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Annealing on the Radio Frequency Sputtered CuO/ZnO Thin Film Heterostructure for Optoelectronic Applications

by
Sinthamani Sivaprakasam
,
Sudhakar Bharatan
*,
Ranjithkumar Mohanam
and
Sudharsanam Subramaniyam
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur 602 117, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(4), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040789
Submission received: 24 December 2025 / Revised: 30 January 2026 / Accepted: 4 February 2026 / Published: 18 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Thin Films and Interfaces)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • ZnO and CuO thin films prepared by RF sputtering were optimized under varying annealing temperatures and ambient conditions, leading to improved structural quality.
  • Annealed ZnO films showed increased grain size and strong sub-band absorption, with a PL band-edge at 3.27 eV.
  • Annealed CuO films exhibited direct band-to-band absorption at 2.89 eV due to the disappearance of defect-related sub-bands.
  • Raman spectroscopy and XRD analysis confirmed reduced defects and enhanced crystallinity in annealed CuO films.
  • Al/FTO/MoS2/CuO/ZnO/Al heterostructure demonstrated improved photocurrents, achieving ~5 mA in the dark and ~9 mA under illumination.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • The ZnO/CuO heterostructure device shows improved photocurrent response with the insertion of MoS2 as a hole transport layer, suggesting a viable pathway for high-performance heterostructure devices.

Abstract

ZnO and CuO thin films were deposited separately using the radio frequency (RF) sputtering technique, and the effect of annealing in nitrogen and oxygen ambient environments was investigated. In this article, structural, optical, vibrational, and electrical characterizations were sequentially performed using techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV–visible spectroscopy (UV-vis), Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy, and current-voltage measurements using a DC four-probe station. XRD confirmed a high-crystallinity and wurtzite structure for ZnO, with the preferred orientation being along the c-axis (0001), and a monoclinic structure for CuO, with preferential orientation along the (002) axis. The absorption edges of the ZnO and CuO thin films were determined to be 3.24 eV and 2.89 eV, respectively. However, Urbach tails were observed only in the ZnO thin films, confirming the presence of localized Zn interstitials and oxygen vacancies. The absorption of CuO showed weak Urbach tails, suggesting that the defects were not localized. Raman spectroscopy performed on the ZnO and CuO thin films showed the appearance of weak E2(high) and prominent Ag/B2g modes, confirming the presence of ZnO and CuO bonding states, respectively. PL studies revealed room temperature emission for both the CuO and ZnO thin films, which is crucial for thin film solar cells and photodetectors. Two thin film heterostructures were fabricated with and without MoS2 (a hole transport layer) on FTO substrates. The Al/FTO/CuO/ZnO/Al heterostructure revealed a rectifying behavior with a photo current of 2 mA in the dark, whereas light-induced characteristics resulted in a photocurrent of 5 mA. The Al/FTO/MoS2/CuO/ZnO/Al heterostructure exhibited a similar rectifying behavior, with improved photo currents of 5 mA in the dark and 9 mA in the light.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

ZnO and CuO are some of the most extensively studied oxide semiconductors. The availability of these materials, being abundant in nature, and their non-toxicity make them effective materials for photodetectors [1] and thin film solar cells [2]. Numerous experiments have been carried out on various metal-doped oxides of ZnO (Al, Ga, Mg) and CuO (Co, Zn, Ni) [3,4,5,6,7,8] due to their high transparency and high absorbance in the visible-light region, respectively. CuO is predominantly a p-type semiconductor with a band gap ranging between 1.2 and 1.8 eV for the cupric phase monoclinic structure. This makes CuO a promising near-IR absorption layer for solar cell applications. It is well known that copper oxide exists in two distinct forms, such as copper (II) oxide (CuO, tenorite) and copper(I) oxide (Cu2O, cuprite) [9]. CuO, being a p-type semiconductor, exhibits a monoclinic structure with a narrow bandgap, high absorption, and weak thermal properties. The low thermal conductivity of CuO is known to reduce heat-related losses, improve stability, and enhance long-term performance. CuO also exhibits a high absorption coefficient of the order of >105 in the visible region (400–800 nm). This enables the efficient absorption of photons across most of the visible spectrum, making it attractive as a solar absorber compared to conventional semiconductor materials, such as silicon, which has a relatively lower absorption coefficient of the order of 104 cm−1. Alternatively, Cu2O forms a cubic structure and exhibits a wider bandgap of 1.8–2.5 eV [10]. Due to the above merits and the ease of its fabrication, CuO films are potential candidate for applications in photodetectors, sensors, and solar cells.
ZnO exhibits excellent electrical and optical properties (3.3 eV bandgap), with higher mobility, strong optical transparency, and bandgap tunability. The role of ZnO in the p-n heterostructure is that it provides not only optical transparency but also forms an effective electron transport layer. Although the efficiencies of metal–oxide thin film solar cells are lower than those of perovskite solar cells (26.7% efficiency) [11], metal–oxides play a vital role in improving solar-cell efficiency and chemical stability.
The combination of CuO and ZnO forms a p-n heterostructure and has been realized in a variety of applications, such as solar cells [12], sensors [13], optoelectronics [14,15], and biomedical engineering [16]. Traditional fabrication techniques, such as molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [17], pulsed laser deposition [18], metal–organic chemical vapor deposition [19], sol–gel [20], and radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering [21], have been employed in fabricating devices such as photodetectors, solar cells, and photocatalysts. Among these techniques, RF sputtering is one of the most preferred, which offers scalability, uniformity, low-temperature growth, and a low-cost option for oxide semiconductors.
Even though RF-sputtered ZnO thin films are known to exhibit high mobilities, they are dominated by native defects arising from high background carrier concentrations, which can be detrimental to device performance [14,15,16,17]. Defect densities in ZnO are known to modify the optical and electrical properties crucial for various optoelectronic applications. However, RF sputtering employs a non-equilibrium growth technique that helps control defect densities in thin films by modifying deposition parameters [22,23,24]. Some defects, including oxygen vacancies and Zn/Cu interstitials, depend on gas partial pressures, deposition conditions, and annealing conditions [25]. In this work, changes in the annealing conditions will be characterized by various techniques, such as XRD, Raman spectroscopy, SEM, UV–visible spectroscopy, and photoluminescence, and their impact on device performance will be evaluated by a DC electrical characterization setup.
The use of metal–oxide thin films allows us to design visible-light-absorbing active layers for the efficient transportation of carriers due to minimum interface defect states [26]. Due to these capabilities, CuO was selected as the solar absorber, coupled with n-ZnO. Many groups have reported much lower power conversion efficiencies of 1–2% for the above combination of CuO/ZnO [27]. Kaphle et al. have reported the highest efficiency, at 2.11% for CuO/Co-doped ZnO with a MoO3 buffer-layered solar cell, to the best of our knowledge [28]. However, a solar cell efficiency of 30% was theoretically reported as being obtained using a CuO/ZnO-based heterostructure. The reasons for these low power conversion efficiencies are due to unintentional defects, such as vacancies and interstitials, present in the layers. Similarly, CuO thin film photodetectors have been extensively studied because of their narrow bandgap and low-cost deposition technique, despite the challenge of defect states [5]. Annealing is a major process step in controlling these defects. Hence, our work focuses on the reasons for the drop in efficiency and on ways to improve it by changing post-deposition annealing methods under various ambient conditions. The desirable properties of thin films were obtained by optimizing the variation in deposition parameters such as RF power, gas flow, annealing temperature, and ambient. In this work, an Al/FTO/CuO/ZnO/Al thin film heterostructure was fabricated and electrically characterized. In addition, MoS2 was used as a hole-transport layer to study the improvement in the photo current. Based on thin film optimization, thin film heterostructures were fabricated, and their electrical properties were examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. ZnO and CuO Thin Films

Metal–oxide thin films were deposited on p-Si substrates (5–10 Ω.cm resistivity) using RF magnetron sputtering. The substrates were cleaned using electronic grade chemicals (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) starting with RCA1 (Radio Corporation of America), RCA2, and HF dip to get rid of surface impurities [29]. The Radio Corporation of America developed a unique cleaning method for silicon substrate to remove organic and ionic contamination from the surface. RCA1 cleaning was carried out to remove organic compounds using a solution mixture of DI water: NH4OH: H2O2, in the ratio of 5:1:1 and heat treatment at 75 °C for 10 min. RCA2 cleaning was subsequently carried out using a 6:1:1 mixture of DI water: HCl: H2O2 and heat treatment at 75 °C for 10 min. After RCA2, the substrate was dipped into hydrofluoric acid for 5 s to remove native oxide [29].
First the chamber was pumped down to 5 × 10−5 mbar, and the RF power was set for thin films as per the data given in Table 1, with an argon:oxygen flow rate ratio of 2:1. Aalborg mass flow controllers (Aalborg Instruments and Controls Inc., Orangeburg, NY, USA) were used for the controlled argon and oxygen gas flow. During both the ZnO and CuO depositions, the target-to-substrate distance was maintained at 7.5 cm. The targets were pre-sputtered for 10 min to obtain homogeneous thin films. A series of ZnO and CuO films was deposited at room temperature and 150 °C, respectively, as shown in Table 1, and optimization of thin films was carried out.
The ZnO thin films of 180 nm thick were deposited using a 99.99% pure ZnO target of 2″ diameter. Ex situ annealing was carried out on the samples SZ2 in the presence of nitrogen in the tubular chamber. CuO thin film was deposited on a silicon substrate (SC1) for 45 min with a substrate temperature of 150 °C, and SC2 was annealed (in situ inside the sputtering chamber) in the presence of oxygen for one hour at 300 °C using a Cu target. Two-inch diameter, 3 mm thick, and 99.99% pure sputtering targets of ZnO, Cu, and MoS2 were purchased from Ultrahigh Vacuum Solutions LLP, Bangalore, India.
Theta/2 Theta X-ray diffraction was carried out on Samples SZ1, SZ2, SC1, and SC2 using a Rigaku Smart Lab X-Ray Diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Subsequently, various thin film parameters, such as crystallite size and strain, were calculated from the XRD patterns using peak intensities and the full width at half maximum (FWHM). Transmission and absorbance spectra were obtained for Samples SZ1, SZ2, SC1, and SC2 using a UV-1650PC Shimadzu spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) in the visible region 300–800 nm. A slit width of 1–5 nm, a step size of 1 nm, and a Photomultiplier Tube R6872 (PMT) (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) was employed as a detector for the measurements. Raman spectroscopy was carried out using a LabRam HR Raman spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Vyon, Kyoto, Japan). The Raman spectra were obtained in a backscattering geometry using the 532 nm solid-state laser as the excitation source and liquid nitrogen-cooled Si as the detector. The power at the sample was 3 mW, the diffraction grating was 1200 with l/mm, and the confocal aperture was set at 100 μm with an accumulation time of 45 s. Room-temperature photoluminescence was performed using a 266 nm deep ultraviolet (DUV) laser as the excitation source and a Si photodetector. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Zeiss Ultra55 scanning electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 2 KV (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

2.2. Thin Film Heterostructures

We also fabricated Al/FTO/CuO/ZnO/Al and Al/FTO/MoS2/CuO/ZnO/Al thin film heterostructures, as shown in Figure 1a,b, using a combination of RF sputtering and thermal evaporation on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass substrate, as shown in Table 2. The heterostructure layers were sequentially deposited in vacuum using individual Cu and ZnO targets. First, 180 nm of CuO thin film was deposited, followed by in situ annealing at 300 °C in an oxygen ambient, inside the sputtering chamber. This is followed by the deposition of a 50 nm thick ZnO layer and external annealing in a tubular furnace at 350 °C for 1 h in a nitrogen ambient. Both the top (Al) and bottom contacts (Al) were deposited using thermal evaporation. Final contact annealing was carried out externally at 350 °C for 15 min. The I–V characteristics of fabricated devices shown in Figure 1c were later investigated using the Cascade Summit 11000B-M probe station (Cascade Microtech, Beaverton, OR, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-Ray Diffraction

3.1.1. XRD of ZnO Thin Films

Figure 2 represents the XRD pattern of ZnO samples SZ1 and SZ2, deposited at room temperature (RT) and annealed at 350 °C, respectively. Both SZ1 and SZ2 exhibit dominant (002) XRD peaks at 34.3° and 34.4°, respectively, which comply with the data of JCPDS card No. 36-1451 [30,31,32]. Annealing resulted in a 5× increase in the (002) peak, attesting to improved crystalline quality. In addition to the dominant (002) peak, a weak (103) XRD peak was observed in both SZ1 and SZ2 samples, indicative of a polycrystalline ZnO wurtzite structure.
Based on the FWHM values of the (002) XRD peak, the mean crystallite size of the samples was calculated. Narrower XRD peaks typically indicate larger crystallite size. From the (002) XRD FWHM data, various parameters, such as grain size (D), lattice strain ( δ ) and dislocation density ( ε ), were calculated using Debye–Scherrer’s formula [33,34,35] and are presented in Table 3.
D = 0.9 λ β c o s θ  
ε = 1 D 2
  δ = β 4 t a n θ
Sample SZ2 exhibits a narrow FWHM of 0.451°, which corresponds to a larger crystallite size of 19 nm, whereas Sample SZ1 shows a broader FWHM of 0.945°, which corresponds to a smaller crystallite size of 9.11 nm. Even though a larger grain size attests to improved crystalline properties, the presence of the (103) XRD peak suggests that ZnO does not only have c-axis orientation. Insights into the ZnO texture will be obtained in the later sections through SEM image analyses. While both the samples exhibit weak (103) peaks, the higher (002)/(103) intensity ratio of 25 in the annealed ZnO thin film, when compared with the ratio of 10 in the unannealed thin film, suggests stronger c-axis orientation, which attests to the good quality of the annealed one (SZ2).

3.1.2. XRD of CuO Thin Film

Figure 3 represents the XRD pattern of CuO thin film samples, SC1 and SC2, both deposited at 150 °C, and Sample SC2 alone, which was subsequently annealed at 300 °C in O2 ambient. Both CuO thin films exhibit a dominant peak at 35.4° corresponding to the CuO (002) plane. All the diffraction peaks are consistent with the standard data (JCPDS card no. 89-2531) and attest to the formation of a monoclinic structure of CuO [36]. Sample SC1 exhibits the characteristic monoclinic CuO peak at 36.8° (002) and 39° (111). A strong (111) CuO peak indicates good crystalline quality. Annealed sample SC2 exhibits a significant improvement in (002) XRD peak, in addition to the appearance of a symmetrical (022) XRD peak at 62°. The appearance of a strong (022) peak suggests improved crystalline quality and stabilization of the monoclinic CuO phase after annealing. The symmetry of the (002) and (022) XRD peaks is indicative of reduced strain and fewer defects in the annealed CuO layers. A high (002)/(111) intensity ratio of 10 was achieved in the annealed sample as compared to an intensity ratio of 5 in the unannealed sample (SC1), suggesting the preferred orientation is along the (002) plane.
Similar to ZnO thin films, various grain parameters were calculated for CuO films as well, using Debye–Scherrer’s formula [37,38] and are presented in Table 4. As expected, annealing resulted in a reduction in the lattice strain in annealed sample SC2.

3.2. Raman Characteristics of ZnO and CuO Thin Films

3.2.1. Raman Characteristics of ZnO Thin Film

Figure 4a shows the Raman spectra of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2. Figure S1 shows the Raman spectra of ZnO thin films, SZ1 and SZ2, with silicon peaks. Both samples exhibit E2 (high) mode, characteristic of a ZnO wurtzite structure. A typical E2 (high) mode observed at 437 cm−1 for the wurtzite ZnO structure appears at redshifted 435 cm−1 in both ZnO films. The slight redshift implies the presence of lattice distortion, possibly due to defects related to crystallite boundary stress and/or oxygen vacancies in the ZnO layers. Annealing results in a slight increase in the E2 (high) peak, which could be attributed to the reduction in point defects. However, the asymmetricity of the peak suggests that the defects are not completely annihilated. There have been reports [39] of defect formation, such as tensile strain and oxygen vacancies, due to the bombardment of energetic ions while sputtering, which could explain the redshifted E2 (high) peak.

3.2.2. Raman Characteristics of CuO Thin Films

Figure 4b shows the Raman spectra of CuO samples with two distinct Raman peaks at 296–300 cm−1, corresponding to Ag mode, and 624–630 cm−1, corresponding to the B2g modes of CuO. The strong peak at 520 cm−1 corresponds to the Si substrate. A typical Raman spectroscopy is known to exhibit three modes, Ag, B1g, and B2g, of the crystal structure of monoclinic CuO [40]. Marked improvements in the peak intensities of Ag and B2g modes are observed in the annealed CuO sample, which is indicative of better CuO bonding. As-deposited and unannealed sample SC1 exhibits a redshifted Ag peak at 295 cm−1, and a blueshifted B2g peak at 629 cm−1. The redshifted Ag peak at 295 cm−1 in Sample SC1 is likely due to the sputter-induced defects, due to lattice distortion, and non-stoichiometry of CuO alloy [41]. Upon annealing, the improvement in layer quality is clearly evident due to the blue shift in Ag mode to 300 cm−1, which is close to the typical vibrational Ag mode for monoclinic CuO thin film. The decrease in stress is reflected in the corresponding strain, calculated using XRD data (Table 4).
With regard to the second characteristic, the B1g peak related to O-related vibrations, only the sample SC2 exhibits a weak hump at 346 cm−1. The presence of the B2g CuO peaks in the range of 625 to 629 cm−1 in both samples is due to the lattice-bending vibrations in the monoclinic tenorite CuO [40,41]. Both samples were deposited at 150 °C and cooled down to RT, which could give rise to lattice contraction resulting in compressive strain. [42]. This explains the blueshift of B1g peak relative to the normally observed B1g peak near 612–615 cm−1 in unstrained CuO films. It should be noted that other forms of CuO bonds, such as Cu2O and Cu4O3, were not observed in both samples. Raman bands at around 218 (corresponding to Cu2O) and 533 cm−1 (corresponding to Cu4O3) were not observed [43]. The increase in peak intensity reveals the increase in the bonding strengths of CuO when deposited at 150 °C, followed by annealing at 300 °C [44].

3.3. SEM

Figure 5a,b presents the SEM images of ZnO samples SZ1 and SZ2. Sample SZ1, deposited at room temperature, exhibits a fine-grained morphology with comparatively smaller particle sizes. In contrast, Sample SZ2 displays distinct contours and larger grains. The grain sizes estimated from XRD analysis are 9.11 nm for SZ1 and 19.27 nm for SZ2, which correspond well with the SEM observations, confirming the presence of uniformly distributed, larger grains in SZ2. SEM images of ZnO sample SZ2 with greater magnification are shown in Figure S2. These findings clearly demonstrate that the crystal size of ZnO is strongly influenced by the annealing process.

3.4. UV-VIS–Spectroscopy

3.4.1. UV-VIS–Spectroscopy of ZnO Thin Films

Figure 6a depicts the transmittance plot of as-grown and annealed ZnO thin films, SZ1 and SZ2. The ZnO-CuO-based heterostructure for optoelectronics application requires the combination of good transmittance of ZnO and strong absorption of CuO in the 1.2 eV region. The optimized process parameters for ZnO and CuO thin films were later implemented in the fabrication of the ZnO-CuO thin film heterostructure. Both ZnO thin films exhibit a transmittance of ~85% in the visible region from (350–380 to 750–780 nm), which is transparent enough for solar absorption by the underlying CuO absorption layer. It was observed that Sample SZ1 has a maximum transmittance of 89.96% at 424 nm, and Sample SZ2 reaches a maximum transmittance of 99.05% at 442 nm. UV–visible results indicate a bulk-like absorption for both samples SZ1 and SZ2. Figure 6b compares the absorption edge of both samples. Sample SZ1 exhibits an absorption edge at 3.24 eV, whereas annealing in SZ2 resulted in a blueshift in the absorption edge at 3.27 eV. The relatively low Moss Burstein shift of 0.06 eV could be attributed to the presence of native defects [44]. Sputtered ZnO thin films are known to exhibit point defects, such as Zn interstitials and O2 vacancies, contributing to a possible increase in the carrier concentration and explaining the blueshift observed in Sample SZ2.
The effects of point defects on our ZnO samples were analyzed based on the detailed electronic transitions from the UV–visible absorption spectra. The absorption data were delineated into various transitions, such as interband transition in ZnO material, localized band tail transitions (commonly referred to as Urbach tails), and free carrier absorption [45]. Various groups have studied the occurrence of Urbach tails in their ZnO thin films [46,47].
To identify various sub-bands of our samples, a natural log of the absorption edge and the bandgap was plotted. Figure 6c shows the plot between the ln(α) and the bandgap for Samples SZ1 and SZ2. Sample SZ1 exhibits Urbach tails at 1.55 eV and 2.81 eV, which are attributed to the presence of both O2 vacancies and Zn interstitials, thereby leading to the creation of deep donor and acceptor levels within the bandgap [25]. In contrast, the annealed sample exhibits weak tails at 1.68 eV and 3.03 eV. The Urbach tails observed in Sample SZ1 are attributed to the presence of the above defects, which are annihilated in Sample SZ2. These defects create deep donor and acceptor bands within the bandgap, leading to strong sub-band absorption. Similar Zn interstitials below the conduction band and O2 vacancies above the valence band, with absorptions at 2.8 eV and 1.52 eV, respectively, were observed by Sasikala et al. The fast roll-off at 1.55 eV in SZ1 could be attributed to the presence of highly localized defects. The fast roll-off at 1.55 eV becomes weak in the annealed sample, SZ2, which could be attributed to the reduction in localized defects, particularly Zn interstitials.

3.4.2. UV-VIS–Spectroscopy of CuO Thin Films

Similar Tauc plots between (αhν)2 and energy (eV) were plotted to determine the absorption edge of the CuO-based thin films, SC1 and SC2 (Figure 7a). Both the samples show an absorption edge comparable to the bulk material, confirming good-quality CuO thin films. Sample SC1 shows an absorption edge at 3.17 eV (391 nm) with relatively strong absorption in the violet edge of the visible spectrum, whereas annealed Sample SC2 exhibits a redshift in the bandgap with an absorption edge at 2.89 eV, in the blue region of the visible spectrum, conforming with the increase in grain size, as observed in the XRD calculations (Table 4). The observed redshift after annealing can be attributed to a phase transition from Cu2O to CuO (or a reduction in mixed-phase Cu2O/CuO content), wherein oxidation during annealing promotes the formation of CuO with a lower effective optical transition energy, thereby shifting the absorption edge toward longer wavelengths [47].
The delineation of the sub-bands within the bandgap of Sample SC1 is confirmed from the absorption edge plot in the natural log versus the bandgap. Figure 7b shows the plot between ln(α) and bandgap for Samples SC1 and SC2. Unannealed Sample SC1 clearly shows multiple weak Urbach tails at 1.25 eV, 2.21 eV, 2.8 eV, and 3.1 eV. However, the annealing at 300 °C in Sample SC2 resulted in the disappearance of sub-bands, which could be the result of annihilation of the defects resulting in direct band-to-band absorption at 2.89 eV. The sharp roll-off in ZnO thin films (Figure 6c) represents the presence of highly localized defects, whereas the weak roll-off in CuO thin films suggests that shallow defects only occur in Sample SC1 (Figure 6b) [48].

3.5. Photoluminance of ZnO and CuO Thin Films

3.5.1. Photoluminance of ZnO Thin Films

Room-temperature photoluminescence of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2 is shown in Figure 8a. Both the thin films exhibit PL peak wavelength at 383 nm, which matches well with the absorption edge of 3.27 eV (SZ1) and 3.24 eV (SZ2) from UV–visible spectroscopy data (Figure 6b) [49]. Annealing resulted in a clear increase in the PL intensity for Sample SZ2 as compared to Sample SZ1, conforming with the XRD and UV–visible spectroscopy data. XRD and UV–visible data confirmed a larger grain size and a low level of defects, respectively, attesting to the enhanced layer quality of Sample SZ2. However, the asymmetrical PL indicates the presence of defects and is validated by the delineation of the broad PL peak into various sub-peaks. It is well known that the energy of typical defect levels is in the range of 3.1–3.49 eV. The choice of the number of bands and their corresponding energies was not arbitrary but guided by both experimental features and the established literature. Specifically, the shoulders and intensity variations observed in the PL spectra indicated the presence of multiple emission centers, which will be described in detail in the following section.
Figure 8b shows the Lorentzian fit of the PL spectrum for the annealed ZnO sample SZ2. The broad PL peak resolved into four sub-peaks with emissions at 3.3 eV, 3.24 eV, 3.2 eV, and 3.12 eV. The PL emissions observed at 381 nm, corresponding to 3.25 eV (Figure 8b), are in close agreement with the band-edge absorption at 3.27 eV (Figure 6b), which was correspondingly observed in the UV–visible spectroscopy. Table 4 lists the PL emissions and fitting PL peaks for ZnO (SZ2) and CuO thin films (SC2).

3.5.2. Photoluminescence of CuO Thin Films

Similarly, the PL emission spectrum of the CuO thin films, SC1 and SC2, is illustrated in Figure 9a,b. In the unannealed CuO sample, band-edge luminescence is observed at 3 eV (410 nm PL peak wavelength), which closely matches the band-edge absorption at 3.1 eV obtained in the UV–visible spectroscopy, indicating strong consistency between the two characterizations. In the annealed SC2 sample, the PL peak observed at 425 nm, corresponding to the PL emissions at 2.9 eV, also matches well with the absorption edge of 2.89 eV (Figure 6a) estimated from the UV–visible spectroscopy. The study on the defects was carried out using the Lorentzian fit of the PL spectrum for the annealed CuO sample SC2.
The CuO PL peak has been resolved into four emissions at 3 eV (410 nm), 2.85 eV (434 nm), 2.7 eV (456 nm), and 2.54 eV (487 nm). Similar to the ZnO PL peak, Sample SC2 also exhibits asymmetricity, due to the presence of possible Cu interstitials and O2 vacancies. Peak fit details of the SZ2 and SC2 thin films are listed in Table 5. There have been several reports of PL peaks at 2.7 eV, which are attributed to the presence of O2 vacancies. The broad PL peak is indicative of high levels of defects, creating various traps that lead to sub-bandgap emissions [50].
The presence of localized states and the Urbach tails at 2.89 eV in the tauc plot (Figure 7a) and the broad PL peaks (Figure 9a) are clear evidence of Cu interstitial and oxygen vacancy-related defects in Sample SC2, even after annealing at 300 °C. However, the presence of a weak Urbach tail at 1.25 eV in the corresponding UV-vis spectroscopy (Figure 7b) confirms the presence of the CuO phase.

4. Fabrication of Thin Film Heterostructure

4.1. Fabrication of CuO/ZnO-Based Thin Film Heterostructure (SD1)

In order to evaluate photo currents generated by the CuO/ZnO heterojunction, a thin film hetero structure SD1 was fabricated with the schematic of Al/FTO/CuO/ZnO/Al on an FTO-coated glass substrate (Figure 1a). The details of the thicknesses of CuO and ZnO and their process variations in temperature and the duration of deposition and subsequent annealing are enumerated in Table 2. Photographs of devices SD1 and SD1 with Al patterned contacts at the top and bottom are shown in Figure 1c. Figure 10. shows the current–voltage characteristics of a two-terminal device, SD1. The rectifying behavior is clearly evident from the non-linear increase in the current during forward bias. The rectification ratio of 5.06 (the ratio of forward to reverse bias current) and an ideality factor of 3.37 were obtained for SD1 using Equation (4).
Figure 10. I–V characteristics of device SD1.
Figure 10. I–V characteristics of device SD1.
Materials 19 00789 g010
n = q K B T   d V d ( l n I )
q—electronic charge (1.6 × 10−19 C).
k B —Boltzmann constant (1.38 × 10−23 J/K).
T —absolute temperature (K).
I d —dark current.
V d —dark voltage.
A photocurrent of 5 mA was generated at an applied forward voltage of 1 V for an area of 1 × 1 cm2. It should be noted that for the given surface area, a photocurrent of 5 mA @ 1 V forward voltage is one of the highest reported in the literature when compared to similar RF-sputtered, electrode-deposited, thermal-evaporated, and chemically synthesized thin film solar cells [2,20,28] and thin film hetero structure [51,52,53], as listed in Table 6.
Estimation of the ideality factor (n) indicates the characteristics of the rectifying behavior of the junction. The unity ideality factor represents an ideal junction, typically governed by thermal diffusion process, whereas for n > 2 the transport is governed by tunneling process, and for 1 > n > 2 the transport is controlled by generation recombination (G-R) process. The rectification ratio and ideality factor calculated from the characteristics deviate from the ideal case due to various factors, such as the presence of defects in the ZnO and CuO active layers. Lattice mismatch between CuO and ZnO, traps in the interface [36], and oxidation on the surface of the metal electrodes could be other possible reasons for the high ideality factors.
Based on our thin film optimizations, it is observed that both the ZnO and CuO thin films exhibit defects. However, our results show that the defects are relatively higher in ZnO when compared to CuO, with the presence of deep Urbach tails. The presence of these defect tails at 3.03 eV and 1.68 eV in the annealed ZnO thin films could be the plausible reason for the high ideality factor of device SD1. The absence of Urbach tails in CuO confirms that there is high absorption in the CuO layer, and hence a high photo-current of 2 mA in the dark and 5 mA under light conditions.

4.2. Fabrication of MoS2/CuO/ZnO-Based Thin Film Heterostructure

Figure 11a depicts the I–V characteristics of an Al/FTO/MoS2/CuO/ZnO/Al thin film heterostructure. In device SD2, the MoS2 layer is sandwiched between the substrate and CuO. All the deposition and annealing parameters are unchanged except for the addition of the MoS2 layer, which provides a favorable valence band alignment with CuO, enabling efficient hole extraction and transportation toward the metal contact.
Our previous study on the MoS2 layer confirms that the thin film is p-type in nature. Hence, MoS2 was added as the hole-transporting layer [54]. Device SD2 exhibits a higher photo current of 5 mA in the dark and 9 mA under light conditions, as compared to device SD1.
Figure 11b shows the external quantum efficiency (EQE) measurement of SD1 and SD2; the absence of measurable VOC and ISC in both devices is attributed to the strong leakage currents of the order mA, which suppress the photo response under standard illumination.
Pseudo-short-circuit currents were calculated for SD1 and SD2 from the I–V reverse bias at −1 V, and determined to be 0.79 mA and 1.55 mA, respectively. In Figure 11b, the overall EQE of SD2 is enhanced from 16% in SD1 to 18% in SD2. The addition of MoS2 to the heterostructure enhanced the EQE by 2%, especially due to the possible hole extraction through the MoS2 layer. Accordingly, EQE serves as a sensitive diagnostic tool to confirm photoactivity and assess optical/collection losses, despite the lack of resolvable VOC and ISC in the current device configuration.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, ex situ annealing in N2 ambient for ZnO thin films and in situ annealing in O2 ambient for CuO thin films were systematically studied. In both material systems, XRD analyses revealed that annealing improved the crystalline quality. Raman analyses showed improved ZnO and CuO bonding after annealing. The UV–visible spectroscopy data revealed a bulk-like absorption edge at 3.24 eV for ZnO and 2.89 eV for CuO thin films. In addition to the above, Urbach tails at 3.03 eV and 1.68 eV were observed in ZnO annealed thin film, attributed to the presence of Zn interstitials and oxygen vacancies. Weak Urbach tails were observed only in the as-deposited CuO thin films at 2.8 eV, illustrative of Cu interstitials and oxygen vacancies. Photoluminescence measurement confirms the energy bandgap for both ZnO and CuO. PL studies confirm the presence of defect states in both ZnO and CuO. The presence of PL peak at 400 nm confirms the presence of Zn- and O2-related defects, whereas the PL peak at 456 nm confirms the presence of Cu interstitials and O2 vacancies. Electrical investigation using Hall measurement revealed a carrier mobility of 35 cm2/V-s in CuO Sample SC1, possibly due to high % of Cu interstitials and oxygen vacancies. Post-deposition annealing of CuO resulted in a reduction in Urbach band tail states, which affected the reduction in interstitials and vacancies. Hence, Sample SC2 seems to exhibit the highest carrier mobility of 58 cm2/V-s.
Thin film heterostructures were subsequently fabricated based on the optimized deposition parameters of CuO and ZnO. Optimized Al deposition on CuO and Al deposition on ZnO resulted in ohmic bottom and top contacts, respectively. P-CuO/n-ZnO thin film heterosturcture resulted in high photocurrents of 2 mA in the dark and 5 mA under light conditions. However, high leakage currents of the order of mA are a critical concern. Additionally, a hole transport layer of p-MoS2 was added to the heterojunction solar cell and was shown to exhibit improved photo currents of 5 mA in dark and 9 mA in light conditions. Lastly, pseudo-short-circuit currents of 790 mA and 1.55 mA were determined for devices SD1 and SD2, respectively, indicating that the addition of a hole transport layer results in improved electrical properties of hetero structure SD2.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma19040789/s1, Figure S1: Raman spectrum of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2 Figure S2: SEM image of ZnO thin film SZ2.

Author Contributions

S.S. (Sinthamani Sivaprakasam): methodology, conceptualization, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation. S.B.: conceptualization, supervision, project administration, writing—review, and editing. R.M.: validation, data curation. S.S. (Sudharsanam Subramaniyam): resources, visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work (Thin film Deposition and device fabrication) was carried out in the DST FIST-sponsored Interdisciplinary Nano Research Centre, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur. The thin film characterization in this research work was performed using the facilities at CeNSE, located at the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and device metallization and characterization was carried out using the facilities at CNNP, IIT Madras, as part of the Indian Nanoelectronics User Program (INUP-i2i), supported by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
RCARadio Corporation of America
FTOFluorine-Doped Tin Oxide
FWHMFull Width Half Maximum
CuCopper
MoS2Molybdenum disulfide
JCPIDJoint Committee for Powder Diffraction Standards

References

  1. Hasach, G.A.; Al-Salman, H.S. Enhancing Photoelectric Response of Self-powered UV and Visible Detectors Using CuO/ZnO NRs Heterojunctions. J. Fluoresc. 2025, 35, 5333–5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Iqbal, K.; Ikram, M.; Afzal, M.; Ali, S. Efficient, low-dimensional nanocomposite bilayer CuO/ZnO solar cell at various annealing temperatures. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2018, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yahi, A.H.; Kacha, A.H.; Anani, M.; Salim, K. Optimizing Al-Doped ZnO Thin Films: Structural, Optical, and Electrical Enhancements for Solar Cells. Phys. Solid State 2025, 67, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thambidurai, M.; Kim, J.Y.; Song, J.; Ko, Y.; Muthukumarasamy, N.; Velauthapillai, D.; Lee, C. Nanocrystalline Ga-doped ZnO thin films for inverted polymer solar cells. Sol. Energy 2014, 106, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jenish, S.L.; Valanarasu, S.; Raj, I.L.P.; Ganesh, V.; Yahia, I.S. Improved photo sensing properties of CuO thin films by doping Fe using nebulizer spray pyrolysis method. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2025, 462, 116215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaawash, N.M.S.; Bogle, K.A. The Role of Doping and Passivation in Improving ZnO Photodetector Efficiency: A Review. Opt. Quant. Electron. 2026, 58, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Daoudi, O.; Jellal, I.; Haddout, A.; Benaicha, I.; Nouneh, K.; Idiri, M.; Lharch, M.; Fahoume, M. The outcomes of Zn doping on the properties of CuO thin films prepared via modified SILAR method and its impact on the performance of CuO-based solar cells using Cd0.4Zn0.6S-ETL and Spiro-OMeTAD-HTL. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2024, 35, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akter, S.; Sikdar, T.T.; Sultana, M.; Ahmed, S.; Bashar, M.S.; Rahman, K. Enhancing the performance of CuO thin film in solar cell by introducing optimum amount of Ni doping. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2024, 35, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bunea, R.; Saikumar, A.K.; Sundaram, K. A Comparison of Optical Properties of CuO and Cu2O Thin Films for Solar Cell Applications. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 315–329. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zheng, W.; Chen, Y.; Peng, X.; Zhong, K.; Lin, Y.; Huang, Z. The Phase Evolution and Physical Properties of Binary Copper Oxide Thin Films Prepared by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering. Materials 2018, 11, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Peng, W.; Mao, K.; Cai, F.; Meng, H.; Zhu, Z.; Li, T.; Yuan, S.; Xu, Z.; Feng, X.; Xu, J.; et al. Reducing non radiative recombination in perovskite solar cells with a porous insulator contact. Science 2023, 379, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Al Armouzi, N.; Manoua, M.; Ghanam, Y.; Hilal, H.S.; Liba, A.; Mabrouki, M. Enhancement of p-CuO/n-ZnO Heterojunction Photovoltaic Characteristics by Preparation Route and Sn Doping. J. Electron. Mater. 2024, 53, 3398–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shinde, R.S.; Khairnar, S.D.; Patil, M.R.; Adole, V.A.; Koli, P.B.; Deshmane, V.V.; Halwar, D.K.; Shinde, R.A.; Pawar, T.B.; Jagdale, B.S.; et al. Synthesis and Characterization of ZnO/CuO Nanocomposites as an Effective Photocatalyst and Gas Sensor for Environmental Remediation. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2022, 32, 1045–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sumanth, A.; Mishra, V.; Ramachandra Rao, M.S.; Dixit, T. Interface Analysis of CuO/ZnO Heterojunction for Optoelectronic Applications: An Experimental and Simulation Study. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 2023, 220, 2300256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yin, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Yang, D.H.; Jiao, Y.; Song, J.; Hu, P.; Fan, H.; Teng, F. Multifunctional optoelectronic device based on CuO/ZnO heterojunction structure. J. Lumin. 2023, 257, 119762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mannai, Z.; Bouslama, W.; Karkouch, I.; Bouslama, L.; Khlifi, K.; Aouadi, K.; Nouira, F. Synthesis and Characterization of ZnO and CuO Coatings for antibacterial and antiviral applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2025, 329, 130071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Özgür, Ü.; Avrutin, V.; Morkoç, H. Zinc Oxide Materials and Devices Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy. In Molecular Beam Epitaxy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 343–375. [Google Scholar]
  18. Alrubaye, R.R.; Mohammed, G.H. Structural and optical properties of CuO:Zn:Fe films prepared by pulsed laser deposition. Russ. Phys. J. 2025, 68, 1538–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, M.A.; Nayan, N.; Ahmad, M.K.; Fhong, S.C.; Mohamed Ali, M.S.; Mustafa, M.K.; Tahir, M. Interface study of hybrid CuO nanoparticles embedded ZnO nanowires heterojunction synthesized by controlled vapor deposition approach for optoelectronic devices. Opt. Mater. 2021, 117, 111132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sobihana Shariffudin, S.; Visuvanathan, N.F.; Azahar, N.E.; Saad, P.S.; Hashim, H.; Mamat, M.H. Different Composition Ratio of ZnO/CuO Nanocomposite Thin Film using Sol-gel Spin Coating Technique. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022, 2312, 012044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wisz, G.; Sawicka-Chudy, P.; Wal, A.; Sibiński, M.; Potera, P.; Yavorskyi, R.; Nykyruy, L.; Płoch, D.; Bester, M.; Cholewa, M.; et al. Structure Defects and Photovoltaic Properties of TiO2: ZnO/CuO Solar Cells Prepared by Reactive DC Magnetron Sputtering. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tuyaerts, R.; Poncelet, O.; Raskin, J.P.; Proost, J. Internal Stress and Opto-Electronic Properties of ZnO Thin Films Deposited by Reactive Sputtering in Various Oxygen Partial Pressures. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 122, 155306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jin, Z.; Fukumura, T.; Kawasaki, M.; Ando, K.; Saito, H.; Sekiguchi, T.; Yoo, Y.Z.; Murakami, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Hasegawa, T.; et al. High Throughput Fabrication of Transition-Metal-Doped Epitaxial ZnO Thin Films: A Series of Oxide-Diluted Magnetic Semiconductors and Their Properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 3824–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sener, E.; Bayram, O.; Hasar, U.C.; Simsek, O. Structural and optical properties of RF sputtered ZnO thin films: Annealing effect. Phys. B-Condens. Matter 2020, 605, 412421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muthusamy, S.; Bharatan, S.; Sivaprakasam, S.; Mohanam, R. Effect of Deposition Temperature on Zn Interstitials and Oxygen Vacancies in RF-Sputtered ZnO Thin Films and Thin Film-Transistors. Materials 2024, 17, 5153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kumar, P.S.; Selvakumar, M.; Babu, S.G.; Induja, S.; Karuthapandian, S. CuO/ZnO nanorods: An affordable efficient p-n heterojunction and morphology dependent photocatalytic activity against organic contaminants. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 701, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. KaphKle, A.; Echeverria, E.; Mcllroy, D.N.; Hari, P. Enhancement in the Performance of Nanostructured CuO-ZnO Solar Cells by Band Alignment. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 7839–7854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Koné, K.E.; Bouich, A.; Soro, D.; Soucase, B.M. Insight of ZnO/CuO and ZnO/Cu2O solar cells efficiency with SCAPS simulator. Opt. Quant. Electron. 2023, 55, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kern, W. The Evolution of Silicon Wafer Cleaning Technology. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990, 137, 1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abdullahi, S.; Momoh, M.; Yahya, H.N. Influence of nitrogen annealing on the structural and electrical properties of zinc oxide (ZnO) thin film deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering technique. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol. 2013, 4, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, C.; Furuta, M.; Matsuda, T.; Hiramatsu, T.; Furuta, H.; Hirao, T. RF Power and Thermal Annealing Effect on the Properties of Zinc Oxide Films Prepared by Radio Frequency Magnetron Sputtering. Res. Lett. Mater. Sci. 2007, 2007, 026459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Daniel, G.P.; Justinvictor, V.B.; Nair, P.B.; Joy, K.H.; Koshy, P.; Thomas, P.V. effect of annealing temperature on the structural and optical properties of ZnO thin films prepared by rf magnetron sputtering. Phys. B-Condens. Matter 2010, 405, 1782–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shantheyanda, B.P.; Todi, V.; Sundaram, K.B.; Vijayakumar, A.; Oladeji, I.O. Compositional study of vacuum annealed Al doped ZnO thin films obtained by RF magnetron sputtering. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2011, 29, 051514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bindu, P.H.; Thomas, S. Estimation of lattice strain in ZnO nanoparticles: X-ray peak profile analysis. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2014, 8, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y.; Yao, B.; Lu, Y.; Cong, C.; Zhang, Z.; Gai, Y.; Zheng, C.; Li, B.H.; Wei, Z.P.; Shen, D.Z.; et al. Characterization of biaxial stress and its effect on optical properties of ZnO thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 021915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khojier, K.; Savaloni, H.; Sadeghi, Z. A comparative investigation on growth, nanostructure and electrical properties of copper oxide thin films as a function of annealing conditions. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2014, 8, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dhaouadi, M.; Jlassi, M.; Sta, I.; Miled, I.B.; Mousdis, G.A.; Kompitsas, M.G.; Dimassi, W. Physical Properties of Copper Oxide Thin Films Prepared by Sol–Gel Spin–Coating Method. Am. J. Phys. Appl. 2018, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chi, P.W.; Su, C.W.; Wei, D. Internal stress induced natural self-chemisorption of ZnO nanostructured films. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tran, T.H.; Nguyen, T.A.; Dao, V.P.; Sai, C.D.; Bach, T.C.; Pham, N.H.; Ngac, A.B.; Pham, V.H.; Tran, T.K.; Cheong, H.; et al. Highly sensitive characteristic of surface enhanced Raman scattering for CuO/Au core/shell nanowires substrate. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 3199–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, J.; Ji, W.; Shen, Z.; Tang, S.; Ye, X.; Jia, D.Z.; Yin, X.Q. Synthesis and Raman Spectra of Cupric Oxide Quantum Dots. MRS Proc. 1999, 571, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ravi, S.; Kaiser, A.B.; Bumby, C.W. Effect of temperature and micro-morphology on the Ag Raman peak in nanocrystalline CuO thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 085311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yu, T.; Zhao, X.; Shen, Z.; Wu, Y.; Su, W. Investigation of individual CuO nanorods by polarized micro-Raman scattering. J. Cryst. Growth 2004, 268, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zoolfakar, A.S.; Rani, R.A.; Morfa, A.; Mullane, A.P.; Kalantar-zadeh, K. Nanostructured copper oxide semiconductors: A perspective on materials, synthesis methods and applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 5247–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Patra, N.C.; Bharatan, S.; Li, J.; Tilton, M.L.; Iyer, S. Molecular beam epitaxial growth and characterization of InSb1−xNx on GaAs for long wavelength infrared applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 083104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Urbach, F. The Long-Wavelength Edge of Photographic Sensitivity and of the Electronic Absorption of Solids. Phys. Rev. 1953, 92, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kröger, F.A. The Chemistry of Imperfect Crystals, 2nd ed.; North-Holland Publishing Company Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ogwu, A.A.; Bouquerel, E.; Ademosu, O.; Moh, S.; Crossan, E.; Placido, F. The Influence of Rf Power and Oxygen Flow Rate during Deposition on the Optical Transmittance of Copper Oxide Thin Films Prepared by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sinthamani, S.; Ranjithkumar, M.; Bharatan, S.K.; Anitha, S.; Sudharsanam, S.; Sasikala, M. Optical characterization of RF sputtered copper oxide for thin film solar cell applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 59, 814–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jogi, A.; Ayana, A.; Rajendra, B.V. Modulation of optical and photoluminescence properties of ZnO thin films by Mg dopant. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Siyalo, S.; Etefa, H.F.; Dejene, F.B. Enhancing Structural and Optical Properties of CuO Thin Films through Gallium Doping: A Pathway to Enhanced Photoluminescence and Predict for Solar Cells Applications. Chem. Phys. Impact 2025, 10, 100832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kidowaki, H.; Oku, T.; Akiyama, T. Fabrication and Evaluation of CuO/ZnO heterostructures for Photoelectric conversion. Int. J. Res. Rev. Appl. Sci. 2012, 13, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mukhin, N.V.; Chigirev, D.A.; Bakhchova, L.D.; Konoplev, G.; Kochunov, K.; Kashkul, I.N. Formation of the thin film heterostructures CuO/ZnO by RF magnetron sputtering powder targets. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 387, 012054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Islam, S.M.; Ahmed, S.M.; Bappy, A.J.; Rahman, M.; Rahman, M.; Khatun, E.M.; Rana, P.; Kuddus, A.; Ismail, M.B.A. Nanostructured CuO, ZnO, and CuO/ZnO heterostructures via acetate based electrodeposition: Exploring their optoelectronic properties for potential energy harvesting applications. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2025, 16, 451. [Google Scholar]
  54. Subramaniyam, S.; Bharatan, S.; Muthusamy, S.; Sivaprakasam, S. Effects of Substrate Biasing and Sulphur Annealing on the Surface of MoS2 Thin Films and TFT. Coatings 2025, 15, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Structure (SD1); (b) structure (SD2); (c) photographs of devices SD1 and SD2.
Figure 1. (a) Structure (SD1); (b) structure (SD2); (c) photographs of devices SD1 and SD2.
Materials 19 00789 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2.
Materials 19 00789 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of CuO thin films SC1 and SC2.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of CuO thin films SC1 and SC2.
Materials 19 00789 g003
Figure 4. (a) Raman spectrum of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2. (b) Raman spectrum of CuO thin films.
Figure 4. (a) Raman spectrum of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2. (b) Raman spectrum of CuO thin films.
Materials 19 00789 g004
Figure 5. SEM image of ZnO thin films (a) SZ1, (b) SZ2.
Figure 5. SEM image of ZnO thin films (a) SZ1, (b) SZ2.
Materials 19 00789 g005
Figure 6. (a) Transmittance spectra of ZnO; (b) absorption spectra of ZnO; (c) ln α vs. energy (eV).
Figure 6. (a) Transmittance spectra of ZnO; (b) absorption spectra of ZnO; (c) ln α vs. energy (eV).
Materials 19 00789 g006
Figure 7. (a) Absorption spectra of CuO thin film; (b) ln α vs. energy (eV).
Figure 7. (a) Absorption spectra of CuO thin film; (b) ln α vs. energy (eV).
Materials 19 00789 g007
Figure 8. (a) Photoluminescence of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2. (b) Peak fit of ZnO thin film (SZ2).
Figure 8. (a) Photoluminescence of ZnO thin films SZ1 and SZ2. (b) Peak fit of ZnO thin film (SZ2).
Materials 19 00789 g008
Figure 9. (a) Photoluminescence of CuO thin film (SC1 and SC2). (b) Peak fit of CuO thin film (SC2).
Figure 9. (a) Photoluminescence of CuO thin film (SC1 and SC2). (b) Peak fit of CuO thin film (SC2).
Materials 19 00789 g009
Figure 11. (a) I–V characteristics of device SD2. (b) EQE measurement of SD1 and SD2.
Figure 11. (a) I–V characteristics of device SD2. (b) EQE measurement of SD1 and SD2.
Materials 19 00789 g011
Table 1. Deposition parameters for zinc oxide and CuO thin films.
Table 1. Deposition parameters for zinc oxide and CuO thin films.
SampleDeposition
Temperature
RF Power
(W)
Thickness
(nm)
Annealing
Temperature
Annealing
Duration
Annealing
Ambient
SZ1 (ZnO)Room
Temperature
60180---
SZ2 (ZnO)Room
Temperature
60180350 °C60 minN2 (Ex situ)
C1 (CuO)150 °C65270 ---
SC2 (CuO)150 °C65270 300 °C60 minO2 (In situ)
Table 2. Device fabrication details.
Table 2. Device fabrication details.
DeviceActive LayerHole Transport
Layer
Window
Layer
Bottom and Top Contact
MaterialDeposition TemperatureAnnealing Duration
(mins)
MaterialDeposition
Temperature
MaterialDeposition
Temperature
SD1CuO
(180 nm)
150 °C60-ZnO (50 nm)RTAl
(100 nm)
SD2CuO
(180 nm)
150 °C60MoS2. (30 nm)RTZnO
(50 nm)
RTAl
(100 nm)
Table 3. Parameters of ZnO thin films extracted from XRD peak (002).
Table 3. Parameters of ZnO thin films extracted from XRD peak (002).
Sample
No
(002)
2θ (°)
(002)
Peak
Intensity (a.u)
FWHM
(β) (°)
FWHM
(β) (rad)
Lattice
Parameter
Spacing (nm)
Grain Size
(nm)
Dislocation on Density (nm−2)Lattice Strain
SZ134.29 ± 0.00549.680.945 ± 0.000.01640.269.110.0120.032
SZ234.45 ± 0.001364.090.451 ± 0.000.00780.2619.270.0020.006
Table 4. Parameters of CuO thin films extracted from XRD peak (002).
Table 4. Parameters of CuO thin films extracted from XRD peak (002).
Type2θ (°)(002)
Peak
Intensity
(a.u)
FWHM
(β) (°)
FWHM
(β) (rad)
Lattice
Parameter Spacing (nm)
Grain Size
(nm)
Dislocation Density
(nm−2)
Lattice Strain
SC136.81 ± 0.00399.0583.86 ± 0.000.0670.242.260.1950.2
SC235.77 ± 0.00660.0960.92 ± 0.000.0160.259.480.0110.157
Table 5. Photoluminescence peak fit details of SZ2 and SC2 thin films.
Table 5. Photoluminescence peak fit details of SZ2 and SC2 thin films.
SampleExperimental Peak Value of
Energy (eV)
Peak1 (eV)Peak2 (eV)Peak3
(eV)
Peak4
(eV)
SZ23.13.12 ± 0.013.1 ± 0.013.24 ± 0.013.29 ± 0.01
SC22.83.0 ± 0.012.84 ± 0.012.72 ± 0.012.52 ± 0.01
Table 6. Comparison of the CuO/ZnO thin film hetero structure with the literature.
Table 6. Comparison of the CuO/ZnO thin film hetero structure with the literature.
S. NoYearDeposition MethodStructureZnO
Thickness
(nm)
CuO
Thickness
(nm)
Photo Current
(mA)
Bias
Voltage (V)
12012 [51]Electrode
deposition
Glass/CuO/ZnO/Al~1000~1000Jsc
1.9/cm2
-
22015 [52]VLS-CuO
CBD-ZnO
Si/CuO/ZnONano wire~150.00025−1 to + 1
32018 [53]RF
Sputtering
CuO/ZnO/Pt
Single cycle
1204000.004−10 to + 10
Comparison of CuO/ZnO thin film solar cell with the literature
42018 [2]CuO-RF
Sputtering
ZnO-E Beam
Si/CuO/ZnO100200Jsc
0.44/cm2
−1 to + 1
52023 [20]RF SputteringTiO2/ZnO/CuO245
354
1654
1487
0.0070 to 0.02
62021 [28]ZnO-LPCVD
CuO-RF Sputtering
ITO/ZnO/CuO/Al~200Thin0.015−1.5 to + 1.5
7Our WorkZnO-RF
Sputtering
CuO-RF
Sputtering
FTO/ZnO/CuO/Al
FTO/MoS2/CuO/Al
501800.46
9.82
−1 to + 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sivaprakasam, S.; Bharatan, S.; Mohanam, R.; Subramaniyam, S. Effects of Annealing on the Radio Frequency Sputtered CuO/ZnO Thin Film Heterostructure for Optoelectronic Applications. Materials 2026, 19, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040789

AMA Style

Sivaprakasam S, Bharatan S, Mohanam R, Subramaniyam S. Effects of Annealing on the Radio Frequency Sputtered CuO/ZnO Thin Film Heterostructure for Optoelectronic Applications. Materials. 2026; 19(4):789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sivaprakasam, Sinthamani, Sudhakar Bharatan, Ranjithkumar Mohanam, and Sudharsanam Subramaniyam. 2026. "Effects of Annealing on the Radio Frequency Sputtered CuO/ZnO Thin Film Heterostructure for Optoelectronic Applications" Materials 19, no. 4: 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040789

APA Style

Sivaprakasam, S., Bharatan, S., Mohanam, R., & Subramaniyam, S. (2026). Effects of Annealing on the Radio Frequency Sputtered CuO/ZnO Thin Film Heterostructure for Optoelectronic Applications. Materials, 19(4), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop