Next Article in Journal
High Performance Colored Solar Absorber Coatings for Architectural Value
Next Article in Special Issue
Femtosecond Laser Stealth Slicing of 4H-SiC Wafers with Static Aspheric Aberration Correction
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Accelerated Thermal Aging on the Dispersion Stability of Fine-Denier Silicone Emulsions for Carbon Fiber Precursor Processing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Defects Induced by High-Temperature Neutron Irradiation in 250 µm-Thick 4H-SiC p-n Junction Detector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Voltage 4H-SiC PiN Diodes: Ion Implantation vs. Epitaxial Growth for Wide-Temperature Operation

1
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
2
CNR-IMM, VIII Strada n°5, 95121 Catania, Italy
3
Eni S.p.A, Piazzale Mattei 1, 00144 Roma, Italy
4
INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(4), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040699
Submission received: 20 October 2025 / Revised: 27 November 2025 / Accepted: 5 February 2026 / Published: 12 February 2026

Abstract

This study investigates the electrical performance of two 4H-SiC p+-i-n diodes, based on lightly doped epitaxial layers, representative of high-voltage and neutron-detector structures. Each design was implemented in multiple nominally identical devices and characterized over the temperature range 298–623 K, with particular attention to the influence of p+ layer fabrication, n-type epitaxial layer thickness, and doping concentration. One diode features an ion-implanted p+ layer on a 250 µm thick n-type epitaxial layer, while the other employs an epitaxially grown p+ layer on a 100 µm thick n-type epitaxial layer. A comparison of reverse-bias Current–Voltage (I–V) and Capacitance–Voltage (C–V) characteristics indicates that, although both designs exhibit high-quality epitaxial 4H-SiC material, devices with an implanted p+ anode tend to show a more pronounced temperature-dependence and degradation of selected electrical parameters in reverse bias than those with an epitaxial p+ anode, while forward I–V in the range 298–623 K remains broadly similar for both designs. These observations suggest that anode fabrication and epitaxial design may jointly influence thermal stability, recombination mechanisms, and overall electrical performance, offering guidance for the optimization of 4H-SiC-based power and neutron-detector devices for high-temperature and harsh environments.

1. Introduction

The advancement of strategically important technologies in the nanosystem, nuclear engineering, defence, and space sectors necessitates the development of microelectronic components capable of operating under extreme conditions, including high-temperature and intense-radiation environments. Traditional semiconductor materials such as germanium (Ge), silicon (Si) and gallium arsenide (GaAs) are not suitable for these harsh conditions. One promising material for such applications is silicon carbide (SiC). Its bandgap remains sufficiently wide at elevated temperatures, ensuring that thermally generated intrinsic charge carriers are minimal. This characteristic is crucial for maintaining a good performance in high-temperature environments. In addition, SiC material exhibits a high-breakdown electric field (3–6 MV/cm), excellent thermal conductivity (3–5 W/(cm·K)), strong mechanical and chemical robustness, and a relatively high threshold energy for displacement damage (25–35 eV). Together, these electrical, thermal and structural properties underpin the superior resistance radiation hardness of SiC-based devices [1], notably Schottky and p-i-n diodes. For example, R.L.S. Libby et al. demonstrated that SiC Schottky diodes can achieve fast-switching with only a slight increase in the turn-off loss, owing to their reduced forward recovery voltage overshoot [2]. However, the electrical performance of Schottky diodes tends to degrade at high temperatures. The chemical reactions between SiC and refractory metals during fabrication often lead to the formation of undesirable interface states and transition layers, such as unintentionally grown silicon dioxide (SiO2), which compromise the thermal stability of the devices [3]. X. Wang et al. investigated the forward Current–Voltage (I–V) characteristics of commercial Schottky diodes between 298 K and 773 K [4]. They observed an increase in forward current density above 773 K, attributed to a reduced electric field in the drift region, while the turn-on voltages decreased from 1 V to 0.8 V due to enhanced thermionic emission. In addition, the on-state resistance increased, leading to higher power dissipation during conduction.
In contrast, S. Shao et al. performed extensive studies combining simulation, fabrication, and characterizations of 4H-SiC p-n diodes [5]. They demonstrated a strong agreement between predictions and experimental results, demonstrating that the turn-on voltage decreases from 2.7 V to 1.45 V as the temperature rises from 290 K to 873 K, confirming that SiC p-n diodes maintain stable performance at high temperatures.
A major technological challenge in the manufacturing of SiC p-n diodes lies in achieving low-resistivity p-type layers. This difficulty arises from the limited solubility of acceptor impurities, the formation of compensating intrinsic defects during equilibrium doping, and the relatively high activation energies of acceptor species [6]. High-temperature ion implantation remains the most effective approach to form highly doped p+ regions in 4H–SiC p-n devices, offering excellent spatial selectivity and precise control over the dose and depth profiles. Among available acceptors, aluminum (Al) is preferred to create ion-implanted p–n junctions in SiC due to its good solubility and low ionization energy. However, the electrical activation of Al in 4H-SiC is strongly concentration-dependent. Several coupled physical and electronic mechanisms limit the fraction of implanted atoms that become substitute and ionized acceptors. When the local Al concentration exceeds the solid-solubility limit (~1 × 1020 cm−3), excess Al tends to cluster or precipitate, becoming electrically inactive [7]. Moreover, higher implantation doses cause greater lattice damage, as energetic ions transfer momentum to lattice atoms through nuclear collisions, creating primary knock-on atoms and displacement cascades. These cascades generate large numbers of Frenkel pairs (vacancies–interstitials pairs), antisites and defect clusters. At high local-damage densities, dislocation loops and amorphous regions can also form, while dynamic recombination during and after implantation leaves behind residual point defects and complexes that introduce deep levels in the bandgap, compensating the intended dopants [8,9].
Once Al atoms occupy substitutional sites and become electrically active, their ability to contribute free holes depends strongly on temperature. Because Al acceptors in 4H-SiC have relatively high ionization energies (~0.17–0.28 eV), thermal ionization is incomplete at low temperatures, leading to the partial freeze-out of holes [10].
Post-implant annealing is therefore essential to enhance Al activation and repair lattice damage. During annealing, wafers are typically encapsulated with a carbon cap to prevent surface degradation [11]. The electrical activation of implanted Al increases with annealing temperature, reaching maximum concentrations around 1 × 1020 cm−3 in the range of 2223–2373 K and durations between 0.5 and 5 min [12].
However, Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry/Channelling (RBS/C) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) studies have shown that, even after optimized annealing, the electrical activation of implanted Al typically remains limited to about 50–60%, although hole concentrations up to 1018 cm−3 can be achieved [13]. This partial activation is mainly attributed to residual defects that act as deep-level traps or compensating donors, thereby reducing the number of substitutional and ionized Al acceptors, as confirmed by deep-level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) analyses [14]. Only after prolonged annealing, for example 20 min at 2223 K, is near-maximum can Al activation be reached [15], owing to the progressive recovery of implantation-induced damage and the reduction in compensating defects.
To overcome these limitations, epitaxial growth of the Al-doped layer represents an attractive alternative. Pedersen et al. demonstrated that p-type acceptor incorporation during chloride-based chemical vapour deposition (CVD) of 4H-SiC exhibits a pronounced saturation behaviour. Despite increasing the dopant-precursor flow, the net acceptor concentration tends to saturate at values on the order of 1018 cm−3. This effect is attributed to chlorine-mediated surface reactions combined with thermodynamic and kinetic constraints on dopant incorporation [16]. Although this saturation limits the maximum achievable doping, it also has practical advantages: in situ epitaxial doping yields uniformly substituted, low-defect p-type layers with well-controlled depth profiles and superior crystalline quality, avoiding the lattice damage associated with ion implantation and the need for extreme post-implantation activation anneals.
Consistent with this, Fukaya et al. compared two 4H-SiC p-n diodes in which the p-type layer was formed either by epitaxial growth or Al-ion implantation. The diode with an epitaxially grown p-type layer showed a lower on-resistance, a more uniform distribution of DLTS-detected traps, and consistent cathodoluminescence (CL) signals, providing a clear example of the benefits of chloride-based high-growth-rate CVD for p-type formation [17].
In this work, we investigated the electrical performance of two 4H-SiC p+-i-n diodes over the temperature range of 298–623 K. The first diode (SiC100) features an epitaxially grown p+ layer formed on 100 µm thick n-type epitaxial layer. In contrast, the second diode (SiC250) incorporates an ion-implanted p+ layer on 250 µm thick n-type epitaxial layer. The SiC250 diode was developed within the Joint-Research-Center CNR-ENI “Ettore Majorana” and reproduces the structural design of a device previously exposed to deuterium–tritium fusion neutrons at the Frascati Neutron Generator (FNG) in Italy [18].
This comparison aims to clarify how the fabrication method of the p+ layer, as well as the thickness and doping concentration of the n-type epitaxial layer, influence the electrical characteristics of the devices. The results provide valuable insights for advancing the use of SiC-based detectors in neutron diagnostics for fusion reactors and other demanding environments.

2. Manufacturing Device

The 4H-SiC devices were fabricated at CNR-IMM (Institute for Microelectronics and Microsystems) and INFN-LNS (Laboratori Nazionali del Sud) in Catania. Two device types were produced, with an active thickness of 100 μm and 250 μm and an active area of 25 mm2 and 6.25 mm2, respectively. The SiC100 diode was fabricated starting from a 100 µm thick n epitaxial layer grown on a commercially available <0001> 4° off-axis n++ 4H-SiC wafer. The epitaxial growth was carried out in an ASM P106 reactor (LPE S.p.A. under ASM International N.V., Catania, Italy) using trichlorosilane (TCS) and ethylene (LPE S.p.A. under ASM International N.V., Catania, Italy) as precursors, with a growth rate of 60 μm/h. Further details on this high growth-rate process can be found in Refs. [19,20]. A 5 μm n+ buffer layer was introduced to mitigate the propagation of defects from the substrate into the n-active layer. The p+-n junction was performed by depositing a 0.3 µm thick p+ layer with an aluminum acceptor concentration (NA) to 1 × 1018 cm−3 on the n- epilayer, which had a nitrogen donor concentration (ND) to 7 × 1013 cm−3. The edge structures consisted of a p junction termination extension (JTE) and n+ guard rings, obtained by Al+ and P+ ion implantation, respectively, followed by annealing at 1923 K. An isolation oxide was then deposited, and additional photolithography steps were used to open the contact windows. The front side of the device was metallized by depositing approximately 10 nm of nickel, which was subsequently annealed to form reliable ohmic contacts on both the p+ and n+ regions through the formation of nickel silicide (Ni2Si). After the selective etch removes any unreacted nickel on the oxide, 100 nm thick Ti and 1 µm Al layers were applied along the periphery of the diode for bonding. Finally, a 7 µm thick polyimide layer was deposited to perform the front side passivation. On the backside, the device was mechanically thinned to reduce the total thickness to approximately 110 μm, corresponding to a dead layer of about 10 μm. The backside ohmic contact was then formed by depositing 100 nm of nickel layer and reacting it with the 4H-SiC substrate by laser annealing to form Ni2Si. After the silicide formation, a Ti/Ni/Ag metallization stack was deposited on the backside. The SiC250 diode was fabricated using a 250 µm thick n epitaxial layer on a similar substrate, with the same buffer layer and edge termination design as in the SiC100 diode. The epitaxial growth conditions (growth rate, Si/H2 ratio, C/Si ratio, and doping) were identical; only the growth time was increased to reach 250 µm thickness. The main technological difference between the two diodes lies in the formation of the p+-n junction; in SiC250, the p+ layer was obtained by ion implantation to achieve a higher acceptor concentration NA to 2 × 1018 cm−3 on a 250 µm thick active epilayer with ND to 8 × 1013 cm−3. As for the SiC100 diode, a 7 µm thick polyimide layer was deposited for front-side passivation. No substrate thinning was performed on this diode; however, the same backside metallization process was used. A schematic cross-section scheme of the two diode structures is reported in Figure 1.

3. Experimental Setup

The devices were tested by using a Nextron probe station (Nextron Co., Ltd, Busan, South Corea) interfaced with a Keithley 237 High Voltage Source-Measure Unit (SMU) (Keithley Instruments, LLC, Solon, OH, USA) for Current–Voltage characteristics (I–V) and model 4200-SCS for Capacitance–Voltage (C–V) characteristics. The temperature was varied from 298 to 623 K with a step of 25 K under nitrogen flow. At each step of the temperature, the forward I–V characteristics were measured by sweeping the DC bias from 0 to 5 V in steps of 25 mV, with a compliance current of 10 mA. The reverse characteristics were measured by sweeping the DC bias from 0 to −1000 V in steps of −5 V, with a compliance current of 1 μA. Every 50 K, the C–V characteristics were acquired using the ACS Basic software version 2.1 by sweeping the DC bias from 0 to −200 V in steps of –1 V.
Both I–V and C–V measurements were performed by recording a single value at each temperature in the range 298–623 K; therefore, statistical error bars from repeated measurements are not available. The accuracy of the source-measure unit and the stability of the probe-station contacts were verified experimentally to ensure repeatable measurements. On this basis, we estimate that the uncertainty of each data point is smaller than the symbol size in the plots and does not affect the extracted parameters discussed in the following sections. In addition, we have characterized several nominally identical devices of each type with the same active area; all of them exhibit very similar I–V and C–V characteristics, with extracted parameters agreeing within the experimental uncertainty, indicating that the measurements are reproducible across multiple diodes.

4. Results

4.1. I–V Characteristics

The measured forward J–V curves of two SiC diodes are depicted in Figure 2a. In the voltage range 2.0–2.5 V, the total forward current density (Jtot) is dominated by diffusion–recombination processes. At a higher forward bias, the increase in Jtot becomes less steep due to the onset of series resistance effects. As the temperature increases, Jtot at given forward voltage VF rises because of an enhanced thermal carrier diffusion and recombination rate. Consequently, the forward J–V curves of both diodes shift towards a lower bias [21]. At the same time, the effective series resistance increases at high temperatures.
The diodes were also characterized under reverse bias in the temperature range 298–623 K and for reverse biassing from 0 to −1000 V, as shown in Figure 2b. At −1000 V, the SiC100 exhibits a lower reverse leakage current density of 8 × 10−11 A/cm2 at 298 K, which increases only slightly to 1.53 × 10−10 A/cm2 at 498 K. This weak apparent temperature-dependence is largely attributed to measurement, due to the limited current sensitivity of the SMU (≈1 × 10−11 A). Above 498 K, the leakage current starts to increase more markedly, reaching 7.27 × 10−10 A/cm2 at 523 K, and 2.04 × 10−8 A/cm2 at 623 K. In this temperature range, the leakage current is mainly driven by thermally assisted carrier generation through deep levels in the bandgap [22,23].
Over the temperature range, the SiC250 exhibits a higher leakage current density to 4.81 × 10−10 A/cm2 at 298 K, and a more pronounced curvature in the reverse J–V characteristics. This leakage in this device is likely related to a poorer insulation oxide quality. In particular, the post-oxidation anneals in oxygen (POA), which typically improve oxide stoichiometry and densification and reduces oxygen vacancies, were omitted. The lack of this step can result in a non-stoichiometric, more porous oxide structure with a higher density of structural defects and interface traps [24,25], thereby facilitating leakage conduction through defect-assisted tunnelling. At an elevated temperature, the leakage current density further increases, reaching 5.03 × 10−7 A cm−2 at 623 K under −1000 V.

4.2. Capacitance–Voltage Characteristics

As shown in Figure 3a, the C–V characteristics of the SiC100 diode remain essentially unchanged over the temperature range 298–623 K. The corresponding 1/C2–V curves exhibit a good linear behaviour at all investigated temperatures, as depicted in Figure 3b. This weak temperature-dependence indicates a stable depletion charge and junction capacitance throughout the probed temperature range.
In contrast, the SiC250 diode exhibits an excess capacitance and convex 1 / C 2 –V dependence. Such behaviour is consistent with spatial dopant inhomogeneity in the implanted p+ layer, which modifies the bias dependence of the depletion width. In addition, carrier exchange with interface traps located at the SiO2/4H-SiC interface can introduce an extra capacitance contribution whose magnitude varies with temperature [26].

5. Discussion

5.1. I–V Analysis

The measured forward J–V curves of two SiC diodes in the temperature range 298–623 K are depicted in Figure 1a. The total current density Jtot is described by compact analytical Equation (1) in the form of
J tot   J 0   e q   ( V bi     V F     I R s )   n   k   T  
where J 0 is the saturation current density, q is the electric charge, VF is the applied forward bias, Vbi is the built-in voltage, Rs is the series resistance, k is the Boltzmann constant, and n is the ideality factor [27,28]. Considering the series resistance contribution in the diffusion–recombination region irrelevant, we have extrapolated n and J0 parameters from the theoretical fit of the experimental data. At room temperature, SiC100 exhibits an ideality factor of 2.18, consistent with the presence of generation–recombination centres in the junction region [29]. The ideality factor decreases to 1.51 to 623 K, as shown in Figure 4a. The SiC250 diode exhibits an ideality factor of 2.19 at RT, which relates to a higher density of defects in the thicker epitaxial layer. The ideality factor decreases rapidly to 1.41 at 623 K. On the other hand, a relevant change in pre-exponential parameter Jo is noticeable through the Arrhenius diagram, as depicted in Figure 4b. The calculated activation energy is (1.50 ± 0.07) eV for SiC100 and 1.48 ± 0.06 eV for SiC250 in the range 298–623 K. These values closely agree with each other and fall within the range typically associated with SRH recombination–diffusion in 4H-SiC pn junctions, suggesting that both diode designs are governed by comparable dominant recombination processes under forward bias [27,29].
Furthermore, we have calculated the activation energy ΔE to investigate the behaviour of the reverse leakage current by the following Equation (2):
J r e v   e E a k T
For the analysis of the temperature dependence of the leakage current, we consider a reverse bias of –1000 V to study the temperature dependence of leakage behaviour, as shown in Figure 5. In the SiC100 diode, the angular coefficient of the linear fit yields an activation energy of (1.05 ± 0.07 eV), which is much lower than the 4H-SiC bandgap (Eg = 3.26 eV). This suggests that the J r e v is not governed by generation–recombination (typically Ea ≈ Eg/2) nor by Auger or radiative recombination (Ea ≈ Eg) [30,31]. Instead, the leakage current is primarily influenced by tunnelling effects.
At −1000 V, thermofield emission becomes the dominant transport mechanism: a fraction of the carriers can tunnel directly through the potential barrier under the influence of the electric field, resulting in an increase in leakage current up to 2.04 × 10−8 A/cm2 at 623 K. In addition, when the applied voltage is not yet sufficient to enable full direct tunnelling, trap-assisted tunnelling can occur via deep levels located below the conduction band. The extrapolated activation energy is close to 1 eV, consistent with the EH4/5 defect levels located about 1 eV below the conduction band. These centres are generally associated with the (+/0) charge-state transition of the carbon antisite–vacancy defect (CAV). In DLTS, this transition appears as a deep electron trap: the positively charged CAV+ captures an electron during the filling pulse to form CAV0, and then thermally re-emits it into the conduction band (CAV0 → CAV+ + e), with a typical activation energy of ≈1 eV [32,33].
In this temperature range, the SiC250 diode exhibits higher leakage current density and a more pronounced curvature of J–V characteristics compared to the SiC100 diode, but the lower activation energy to (0.55 ± 0.01 eV) again suggests that Jrev is governed by tunnelling mechanisms rather than traditional generation–recombination processes. This activation energy is consistent with the Z1/2 centre, previously observed in our DLTS study on a similarly fabricated SiC250 detector [34] and commonly associated with acceptor states of the carbon vacancy (VC). This behaviour can be rationalized by assuming two concurrent contributions to the reverse leakage current: a field-controlled component associated with the poorer insulating oxide quality and related interface states, which remain essentially constant at a fixed reverse bias, and a temperature-dependent component linked to the Z1/2 deep level, as reflected by the extracted activation energy.

5.2. Thermal Built-In Potential Distributions

When an external forward bias VF is applied to the 4H-SiC diodes, the effective barrier potential that normally opposes carrier flow is reduced. As VF increases, the total barrier across the junction decreases to Vbi − VF, where Vbi is the built-in potential. This reduction facilitates carrier transport across the junction, resulting in an increased forward current. When the current is dominated by diffusion and recombination processes, Vbi can be estimated using Equation (3):
V bi   =   V F   +   k   T n   q   ln J tot J o  
The built-in potentials Vbi extracted for SiC100 and SiC250 are reported in Figure 6. As the temperature increases, both diodes show the expected decrease in Vbi, consistent with the rise in the intrinsic carrier concentration. For SiC100, Vbi decreases from about 2.6 V at 298 K to 2.16 V at 623 K. The lower Vbi and its comparatively weaker temperature-dependence are consistent with the lower p+ doping, which reduces the junction space-charge and effective barrier height [35]. In contrast, SiC250 exhibits a higher Vbi of about 3.0 V at 298 K and a more pronounced temperature-dependence, dropping to approximately 2.1 V at 623 K. This enhanced sensitivity to temperature may be related to a higher effective p+ doping and to implantation-induced non-uniformities in the junction region, which could modify the carrier recombination and perturb the equilibrium potential.
Complementary values of Vbi are also extrapolated from the Capacitance–Voltage (C–V) characteristics using Equation (4):
V bi   =   kT q   +   ln N A   N D n i 2 ,
which yields slightly higher Vbi values than those obtained from I–V analysis. At room temperature, SiC100 shows a Vbi value of 2.6 V, which decreases to 2.2 V at 623 K (see Figure 6). Both SiC diodes show an apparent bandgap narrowing with increasing doping in the p-n junctions, leading to a reduction in Vbi at higher temperatures [36,37].
The observed difference between Vbi values derived from I–V and C–V measurements stems from the distinct measurement conditions. The I–V characteristics are influenced by recombination and series resistance under non-equilibrium conditions. In contrast, C–V measurements are performed near equilibrium, thus providing a more accurate estimation of Vbi values [38].

5.3. Temperature Dependence of Dopant Activation

When a reverse bias VR is applied, the differential capacitance associated with the depletion region in the drift layer is related to the applied voltage, as expressed in Equation (5):
1 C 2 =   2   ( V R V bi ) A 2 ε 0 ε S q   N D
where ε 0 is the vacuum permittivity, ε S is the relative dielectric constant of 4H-SiC.
The ND values for both diodes are extracted from the slope of the 1/C2–V plots. For SiC100, the n epilayer exhibits a very low ND value of 6.73 × 1013 cm−3 at 298 K, increasing only slightly to 6.79 × 1013 cm−3 at 623 K, as depicted in Figure 7a. The SiC250 diode instead shows a higher ND of 8 × 1013 cm−3 at RT, rising to 8.8 × 1013 cm−3 at 623 K. From the temperature dependence of ND, extremely small activation energies to (0.39 ± 0.02 meV) are obtained for SiC100.
Previous studies report that the ionization energy of nitrogen (N) donors is approximately 61 meV, and so almost all N donors are already ionized at 298 K [6,30]. In lightly doped regions, the Fermi level lies well-below the conduction band edge and shifts slightly toward the midgap as the intrinsic carrier increases with the temperature. This shift reduces the effective activation barrier (EC − EF), partially compensating the increased thermal energy and leading to a nearly temperature-independent free-electron density [1]. Similarity, the N-doped ionization energy of (40.04 ± 0.26 meV) justifies a weak temperature-dependence of free-electron density due to the low ND concentration in SiC250 [39].
Using the built-in potential Vbi and the doping concentration of the epitaxial layer extracted from the C–V measurements, the temperature dependence of the acceptor density NA (T) was determined, as shown in Figure 7b. The SiC100 diode exhibits a NA value of 1.32 × 1018 cm−3 at RT, rising to 4.50 × 1018 cm−3 at 623 K. On the other hand, SiC250 exhibits a higher NA value of 1.83 × 1018 cm−3 to 298 K, increasing to 2.28 × 1019 cm−3 at 623 K, indicating a stronger temperature-dependence. From the Arrhenius plot, the acceptor ionization energy value of (54.87 ± 1.27 meV) for the SiC100 diode is lower than the extrapolated value of (104.65 ± 12.93 meV) for SiC250. The difference between these values is strongly influenced by the uniformity and substitutional incorporation of the Al dopants. The energy level calculated in SiC100 is comparable to the first excited states of Al acceptors in SiC, as predicted by the hydrogenic model [40,41]. At doping levels of approximately 1018 cm−3, the Coulomb potentials of ionized Al impurities overlap, leading to random local potential fluctuations. These fluctuations distort the valence-band edge, generating an exponential tail of localized states that extend into the bandgap. By introducing localized tail states near the valence-band edge, the band tail provides intermediate states into which holes can be thermally excited, thereby reducing the effective energy required to ionize Al acceptors [42,43]. In the SiC250 diode, the situation is more complex. The Al acceptors are introduced by implantation, and residual implantation damage can favour the formation of Al-related defect complexes. These complexes may alter the local potential landscape and shift the effective acceptor level, leading to the higher apparent ionization energy extracted from the temperature dependence of NA [44].

5.4. Temperature Dependence of Carrier Mobilities

The total series resistance RS, given by the sum of the bulk, contact, and material resistance, the contact resistance, and n- epilayer contributions, is calculated from the slope of the forward J–V characteristics in the high-bias (quasi-ohmic) region, and normalized for the different area of the two detectors. For very thick epilayers, the dominant contribution to RS comes from the drift layer, so the substrate and contact resistances can be neglected. At room temperature, the series resistance per unit area is 12.07 Ω/cm2 for SiC100, lower than the value of 565.6 Ω/cm2 measured for SiC250, consistent with the higher resistance of the thicker epilayer, as shown in Figure 8a. In both devices, Rs increase over the temperature range 298–623 K, mainly due to the reduction in electron drift mobility (µd) with temperature, while ND remains nearly constant [45].
The drift mobility µd can be estimated from the series resistance using Equation (6):
μ d =   L q N D R s A
where L is the thickness of n region and A is the cross-sectional area of the diode.
As shown in Figure 8a, SiC100 exhibits μ d value of 1233 cm2 V−1 s−1 at RT, which is higher than the value of 1020 cm2 V−1 s−1 predicted in the Caughey–Thomas (C–T) model at the corresponding doping level [46]. In this diode, the nitrogen donor ionization energy is low enough that all N atoms are ionized already at RT, and the total density of the ionized scattering centre is smaller than assumed in the C–T model, resulting in a somewhat-higher mobility. As the temperature is increased to 623 K, phonon scattering becomes more pronounced, and μ d decreases to about 1040 cm2 V−1 s−1.
Similarly, the SiC250 exhibits a lower μ d of 1050 cm2 V−1 s−1 at RT, consistent with the higher ND value measured from C–V characterization (Figure 7a), and μ d further decreases to about 830 cm2 V−1 s−1 at 623 K due to the combined effects of ionized-impurity and phonon scattering.
The drift mobility is fitted as function of temperature by using a power–law relationship (7):
μ d     T - β ,
where β is the temperature exponent, which depends on factors such as the doping concentration and crystallographic direction. F. La Via et al. reported that the parameter β was approximately equal to three for an n-type doping concentration of 1 × 1016 cm−3 due to phonon scattering, which leads to a stronger temperature-dependence [47]. In contrast, the exponent extracted from our data are significantly smaller, β = 0.2 for SiC100 and β = 0.3 for SiC250, indicating a much weaker decrease in µd with temperature. This behaviour is consistent with the very-low nitrogen doping levels and the nearly complete donor ionization in our epilayers, so that mobility is governed by a balance between ionized-impurity and phonon scattering rather than by phonons alone over the investigated temperature range.

5.5. Temperature Behaviour of Drift Collection Time

When a p–n junction is subjected to reverse bias, the depletion region (W) widens, establishing Vbi that governs charge carrier motion within this space-charge region [48]. Assuming an abrupt, one-sided junction with uniform doping on the depleted side, W is expressed either from the measured capacitance or from the voltage-based expression, by following Equation (8):
W   =   ε S   ε 0 A C   =   V bi V   2   k   T q 2 q   ε s ε 0 N D  
At −200 V, the lightly N-doped SiC100 diode exhibits the largest W value of 63 µm at RT, as depicted in Figure 9a. At 623 K, the increase in the intrinsic carrier generation reduces V b i , resulting in a smaller W of approximately 61 µm. In contrast, the SiC250 diode, more heavily doped on the n-side, shows a narrower W of about 54 µm at RT. This reduction follows directly from the inverse square-root dependence of W on ND. A higher donor-density provides a sufficient charge balance over a shorter distance, reducing the depletion width required to sustain Vbi. Raising the temperature to 623 K, the reduction in Vbi led to the narrowing of W to 49 µm.
Under reverse bias and low-injection conditions, the injected minority carrier density remains significantly lower than the equilibrium majority carrier concentration. Under a low-injection condition, the generation and recombination of the minority carriers dominate the transient behaviour [49,50]. In this regime, the Hall mobility (µh) is related to the drift mobility through the Hall scattering factor (γH), as described by Equation (9):
µ h   =   γ h   µ d
Considering the NA value to 1.2 × 1018 cm−3, the thermal distribution of γ H was taken from the study of S. Asada et al. in the temperature range 298–623 K [51].
The drift collection time of minority carriers (τ) across the depletion region is given by Equation (10) below:
τ =   q   W 2 μ h k   T
The temperature dependence of the drift collection time for the two 4H-SiC pn diodes is shown in Figure 9b. For the SiC100 diode, the collection time decreases from approximately12.7 µs at 298 K to 7 µs at 623 K. This trend reflects the temperature dependence of the Hall mobility and of the internal field: at a fixed bias, the drift time scales approximately as τ ∝ 1/μh. The continuous reduction in tdrift with an increasing temperature therefore indicates an overall increase in the effective carrier velocity in this temperature range, consistent with a progressive weakening of ionized-impurity scattering and a moderate impact of phonon scattering up to 623 K [52]. In contrast, the SiC250 diode exhibits a systematically lower Hall mobility and, correspondingly, a longer drift collection time from 15 µs at 298 K to 8 µs at 623 K, which suggests a higher density of charged defects and/or stronger compensation in this sample. A full separation of the individual scattering contributions is beyond the scope of this work, but the correlation between Hall mobility and drift collection time is clear in both devices.

6. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the electrical performance of two 4H-SiC p+-i-n diodes, incorporating a p+ layer formed either by epitaxial growth (SiC100) or by Al-ion implantation (SiC250), over the temperature range 298–623 K. The electrical behaviour of each design was found to be consistent and reproducible across multiple nominally identical devices. Under forward bias, the evolution of the ideality factor and the extracted activation energies for both diodes fall within the range typically associated with deep-level generation–recombination processes in 4H-SiC p+-i-n junctions and are therefore consistent with a significant SRH mechanism, although the extracted mobilities confirm the high quality of the epitaxial layers in both designs.
SiC100 exhibits a lower built-in potential and a comparatively weaker temperature-dependence of key parameters, indicating improved thermal stability within the investigated range. By contrast, SiC250 shows a higher built-in potential and a more pronounced temperature sensitivity. This behaviour correlates with features in the C–V and reverse-bias characteristics that are compatible with enhanced interface-trap activity and junction non-uniformity in the implanted structure. At −1000 V reverse bias, leakage in both diodes is dominated by a tunnelling mechanism: SiC100 shows an activation energy of ≈1.05 eV, associated with EH4/5, while SiC250 shows ≈0.55 eV, attributed to Z1/2 centres.
Although the p+ epitaxial layer in SiC100 has a relatively low doping concentration (≈1 × 1018 cm−3), its electrical characteristics are significantly less temperature-dependent than those of the implanted diode (SiC250). These results show that the method used to fabricate the anode (epitaxial grow versus ion implantation) can have a stronger impact on high-temperature stability than modest differences in doping, providing concrete guidance for the design of SiC devices intended for harsh environments.
A more systematic study, in which (i) diodes with different thicknesses are fabricated using the same technology and (ii) diodes of different technologies are realized with the same thickness, will be required to fully decouple these contributions, and we identify this as an important direction for future work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.G., L.C., S.T. and F.L.V.; methodology, A.S.M., L.C., S.T. and F.L.V.; software, A.M.; validation, A.S.M., S.D.L., E.S., A.M., E.G., S.V., E.Q., A.T. and S.T.; formal analysis, A.S.M., S.D.L., S.V. and E.Q.; investigation, A.S.M., S.D.L. and E.S.; resources, L.C., S.T. and F.L.V.; data curation, A.S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.M. and F.L.V.; writing—review and editing, S.D.L., E.S., A.M., E.G., S.V., E.Q. and L.C.; visualization, A.S.M., E.S., A.T. and S.T.; supervision, E.G. and A.T.; funding acquisition, A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union (Next Generation EU) through the MUR-PNRR project SAMOTHRACE (ECS00000022), and from ENI, JRA Fusione ENI-CNR Sottoprogetto 5 “Elettronica di Potenza ad alta efficienza per fusion a confinamento magnetico basata su SiC. Rivelatori nucleari”.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Erik Gallo, Silvia Vanellone, Eleonora Quadrivi, and Antonio Trotta were employed by the company Eni S.p.A. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kimoto, T.; Cooper, J. A Unipolar and Bipolar Power Diodes. In Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA; Singapore, 2014; pp. 294–296. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ligaya, R.; Libby, S.; Sison, L.G.; Dela Cruz, M. Switching Performance Characterization of SiC Schottky Diodes in Switch-Mode DC-DC Converters. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Hammamet, Tunisia, 8 December 2004; pp. 628–633. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gali, A.; Heringer, D.; Deák, P.; Hajnal, Z.; Frauenheim, T.; Devaty, R.P.; Choyke, W.J. Isolated Oxygen Defects in 3C- and 4H-SiC: A Theoretical Study. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2002, 66, 125208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, X.; Qi, J.; Yang, M. Characterization of 600V/650V Commercial SiC Schottky Diodes at Extremely High Temperatures. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG), Xi’an, China, 3 June 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shao, S.; Lien, W.C.; Maralani, A.; Cheng, J.C.; Dorsey, K.L.; Pisano, A.P. 4H-Silicon Carbide p-n Diode for High Temperature (600 °C) Environment Applications. Mater. Sci. Forum 2015, 821–823, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Roccaforte, F.; Fiorenza, P.; Vivona, M.; Greco, G.; Giannazzo, F. Selective Doping in Silicon Carbide Power Devices. Materials 2021, 14, 3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Linnarsson, M.K.; Janson, M.S.; Zimmermann, U.; Svensson, B.G.; Persson, P.O.Å.; Hultman, L.; Wong-Leung, J.; Karlsson, S.; Schöner, A.; Bleichner, H.; et al. Solubility limit and precipitate formation in Al-doped 4H-SiC epitaxial material. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 2016–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kumar, P.; Martins, M.I.M.; Bathen, M.E.; Prokscha, T.; Grossner, U. Al-implantation induced damage in 4H-SiC. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2024, 174, 108241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.; Ren, F.; Wang, Z.; Sun, X.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Ye, J.; Chen, X.; Xu, W.; Zhou, D. Dynamic reactions of defects in ion-implanted 4H-SiC upon high temperature annealing. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2023, 56, 235102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kawahara, K.; Watanabe, H.; Miura, N.; Nakata, S.; Yamakawa, S. Shallow and Deep Levels in Al+-Implanted p-Type 4H-SiC Measured by Thermal Admittance Spectroscopy. Mater. Sci. Forum 2015, 821–823, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Canino, M.; Fedeli, P.; Albonetti, C.; Nipoti, R. 4H-SiC surface morphology after Al ion implantation and annealing with C-cap. J. Microsc. 2020, 280, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nipoti, R.; Scaburri, R.; Hallén, A.; Parisini, A. Conventional thermal annealing for a more efficient p-type doping of Al+ implanted 4H-SiC. J. Mater. Res. 2013, 28, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tang, Y.D.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhou, Z.D.; Bai, Y.; Li, C.Z. Defects and Electrical Properties in Al-Implanted 4H-SiC after Activation Annealing. Chin. Phys. B 2019, 28, 106101–106106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ayedh, H.M.; Puzzanghera, M.; Svensson, B.G.; Nipoti, R. DLTS Study on Al+ Ion Implanted and 1950 °C Annealed p-i-n 4H-SiC Vertical Diodes. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 897, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fedeli, P.; Gorni, M.; Carnera, A.; Parisini, A.; Alfieri, G.; Grossner, U.; Nipoti, R. 1950 °C Post Implantation Annealing of Al+ Implanted 4H-SiC: Relevance of the Annealing Time. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2016, 5, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pedersen, H.; Beyer, F.C.; Henry, A.; Janzén, E. Acceptor incorporation in SiC epilayers grown at high growth rate with chloride-based CVD. J. Cryst. Growth 2009, 311, 3364–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fukaya, S.; Yonezawa, Y.; Kato, T.; Kato, M. Depth Distribution of Defects in SiC PiN Diodes Formed Using Ion Implantation or Epitaxial Growth. Phys. Status Solidi B Basic Res. 2022, 259, 2100419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kushoro, M.H.; Angelone, M.; Bozzi, D.; Cancelli, S.; Dal Molin, A.; Gallo, E.; Gorini, G.; La Via, F.; Parisi, M.; Perelli Cippo, E. Operation of a 250 μm-Thick SiC Detector with DT Neutrons at High Temperatures. Fusion Eng. Des. 2024, 204, 114486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. La Via, F.; Izzo, G.; Mauceri, M.; Pistone, G.; Condorelli, G.; Perdicaro, L.; Abbondanza, G.; Calcagno, L.; Foti, G.; Crippa, D. 4H-SiC epitaxial layer growth by trichlorosilane (TCS). J. Cryst. Growth 2008, 311, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. La Via, F.; Camarda, M.; La Magna, A. Mechanisms of growth and defect properties of epitaxial SiC. J. Apply. Phys. 2014, 1, 031301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qi, J.; Yang, X.; Li, X.; Chen, W.; Tian, K.; Wang, M.; Guo, S.; Yang, M. Comparative Temperature Dependent Evaluation and Analysis of 1.2-KV SiC Power Diodes for Extreme Temperature Applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 13384–13399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raja, P.V.; Raynaud, C.; Asllani, B.; Morel, H.; Planson, D. Electrically Active Traps in 4H-Silicon Carbide (4H-SiC) PiN Power Diodes. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaneko, M.; Chi, X.; Kimoto, T. Tunneling Current in 4H-SiC p-n Junction Diodes. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2020, 67, 3329–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, D.Z.; Strand, J.; Munde, M.S.; Shluger, A.L. Mechanisms of Oxygen Vacancy Aggregation in SiO2 and HfO2. Front. Phys. Sec. Chem. Phys. Phys. Chem. 2019, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Q.; Nannan, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, K.; Wang, S. Study on the Oxygen Partial Pressure Dependent Annealing Effect for SiO2/SiC Stack. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2024, 10, 2400040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Basile, A.F.; Mooney, P.M. Modeling of high-frequency capacitance-voltage characteristics to quantify trap distributions near SiO2/SiC interfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 094509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sah, C.-T.; Noyce, R.N.; Shockley, W. Carrier Generation and Recombination in P-N Junctions and P-N Junction Characteristics. Proc. IRE 1957, 45, 1228–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kasap, S.O. Semiconductor Devices in Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 548–550. [Google Scholar]
  29. Strel’chuk, A.M.; Mashichev, A.V.; Lebedev, A.A.; Volkova, A.N.; Zekentes, K. About the Nature of Recombination Current in 4H-SiC Pn Structures. Mater. Sci. Forum 2006, 527–529, 1343–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Galeckas, A.; Linnros, J.; Grivickas, V.; Lindefelt, U.; Hallin, C. Auger Recombination in 4H-SiC: Unusual Temperature Behavior. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 71, 3269–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanaka, K.; Kato, M. Analysis of Carrier Recombination Coefficients of 3C- and 6H-SiC: Insights into Recombination Mechanisms in Stacking Faults of 4H-SiC. AIP Adv. 2023, 13, 085220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Capan, I.; Brodar, T.; Makino, T.; Radulovic, V.; Snoj, L. M-Center in Neutron-Irradiated 4H-SiC. Crystals 2021, 11, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karsthof, R.; Bathen, M.E.; Galeckas, A.; Vines, L. Conversion pathways of primary defects by annealing in proton-irradiated n-type 4H-SiCJ. Phys. Rev. 2020, 102, 184111–184112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mancuso, A.S.; Sangregorio, E.; Muoio, A.; De Luca, S.; Kushoro, M.H.; Gallo, E.; Vanellone, S.; Quadrivi, E.; Trotta, A.; Calcagno, L.; et al. Defects Induced by High-Temperature Neutron Irradiation in 250 µm-Thick 4H-SiC p–n Junction Detector. Materials 2025, 18, 2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Baliga, B.J. Material Properties and Transport Physics. In Fundamentals of Power Semiconductor Devices; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xi, J.; Yang, J. Temperature-Dependent Band Gaps in Several Semiconductors: From the Role of Electron-Phonon Renormalization. J. Condens. Matter. Phys. 2020, 32, 475503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Persson, C.; Lindefelt, U.; Sernelius, B.E. Band Gap Narrowing in N-Type and p-Type 3C-, 2H-, 4H-, 6H-SiC, and Si. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 4419–4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Trovato, G.; Meli, A.; Muoio, A.; Reitano, R.; Calcagno, L.; Kushoro, M.H.; Rebai, M.; Tardocchi, M.; Trotta, A.; Parisi, M.; et al. 250 mm Thick Detectors for Neutron Detection: Design, Electrical Characteristics, and Detector Performances. Key Eng. Mater. 2024, 984, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Blood, P.; Orton, J.W. The electrical characterisation of semiconductors. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1978, 41, 159–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Matsuura, H. Influence of excited states of a deep substitutional dopant on majority-carrier concentration in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 245216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, F.; McGill, T.C. Variation of impurity-to-band activation energies with impurity density. J. Appl. Phys. 1975, 46, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Morgan, T.N. Broadening of Impurity Bands in Heavily Doped Semiconductors. Phys. Rev. 1965, 139, A343–A348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kane, E.O. Thomas-Fermi Approach to Impure Semiconductor Band Structure. Phys. Rev. 1963, 131, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Weiße, J.; Hauch, M.; Krieger, M.; Bauer, A.J.; Eribacher, T. Aluminum acceptor activation and charge compensation in implanted p-type 4H-SiC. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 055308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Efros, A.L. Electron localization in disordered systems (the Anderson transition). Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 1975, 21, 746–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tian, K.; Xia, J.; Elgammal, K.; Schöner, A.; Kaplan, W.; Karhu, R.; Ul-Hassan, J.; Hallén, A. Modelling the Static On-State Current Voltage Characteristics for a 10 KV 4H–SiC PiN Diode. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 115, 105097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. La Via, F.; Galvagno, G.; Roccaforte, F.; Ruggiero, A.; Calcagno, L. Drift mobility in 4H-SiC Schottky diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 142105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sze, S.M.; Kwock, K.; Ng, P.-N. Junctions in Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd ed.; Wiley Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 77–133. [Google Scholar]
  49. Deng, T.; Yang, D.; Pi, X. Phonon-limited carrier mobilities and Hall factors in 4H-SiC from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 235203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hazdra, P.; Smrkovský, P.; Popelka, S. Radiation Defects and Carrier Lifetime in 4H-SiC Bipolar Devices. Phys. Status Solidi A Appl. Mater. Sci. 2021, 218, 2100218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Asada, S.; Okuda, T.; Kimoto, T.; Suda, J.H. Hall Scattering factors in p-type 4H-SiC with various doping concentrations. Appl. Phys. Express 2016, 9, 041301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Contreras, S.; Konczewicz, L.; Arvinte, R.; Peyre, H.; Chassagne, T.; Zielinski, M.; Juillaguet, S. Electrical transport properties of p-type 4H-SiC. Phys. Status Solidi A 2017, 214, 1600679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic cross-section of (a) SiC100 and (b) SiC250 diodes.
Figure 1. Schematic cross-section of (a) SiC100 and (b) SiC250 diodes.
Materials 19 00699 g001
Figure 2. (a) Forward J–V and (b) reverse J–V curves at different temperatures ranging from 298 K to 623 K in steps of 25 K. The curves are normalized for the area of the different devices. The color code corresponds to 298 K (black), 323 K (red), 348 K (green), 373 K (blue), 398 K (cyan), 423 K (magenta), 448 K (dark yellow), 473 K (navy), 498 K (purple), 523 K (wine), 548 K (olive green), 573 K (dark cyan), 598 K (royal blue), and 623 K (orange).
Figure 2. (a) Forward J–V and (b) reverse J–V curves at different temperatures ranging from 298 K to 623 K in steps of 25 K. The curves are normalized for the area of the different devices. The color code corresponds to 298 K (black), 323 K (red), 348 K (green), 373 K (blue), 398 K (cyan), 423 K (magenta), 448 K (dark yellow), 473 K (navy), 498 K (purple), 523 K (wine), 548 K (olive green), 573 K (dark cyan), 598 K (royal blue), and 623 K (orange).
Materials 19 00699 g002
Figure 3. (a) C–V characteristics, (b) Reciprocal of the squared capacitance, in the temperature range 298–623 K, with a temperature step of 50 K. The curves are normalized for the device area. The color code corresponds to 298 K (black), 323 K (red), 373 K (green), 423 K (blue), 473 K (cyan), 523 K (magenta), 573 K (yellow) and 623 K (dark yellow).
Figure 3. (a) C–V characteristics, (b) Reciprocal of the squared capacitance, in the temperature range 298–623 K, with a temperature step of 50 K. The curves are normalized for the device area. The color code corresponds to 298 K (black), 323 K (red), 373 K (green), 423 K (blue), 473 K (cyan), 523 K (magenta), 573 K (yellow) and 623 K (dark yellow).
Materials 19 00699 g003
Figure 4. (a) Thermal distribution of ideality factor and (b) Arrhenius plot of J0 in the temperature range 298–623 K. The estimated uncertainty of each point is smaller than the symbol size (also valid for the other figures).
Figure 4. (a) Thermal distribution of ideality factor and (b) Arrhenius plot of J0 in the temperature range 298–623 K. The estimated uncertainty of each point is smaller than the symbol size (also valid for the other figures).
Materials 19 00699 g004
Figure 5. Arrhenius plot of reverse leakage current in the temperature range 498–623 K.
Figure 5. Arrhenius plot of reverse leakage current in the temperature range 498–623 K.
Materials 19 00699 g005
Figure 6. Built-in potential distributions in temperature range 298–623 K for SiC100 and SiC250. Solid lines and open symbols refer to Vbi values calculated by C–V characteristics, while dash lines and closed symbols to Vbi values extrapolated by forward I–V characteristics.
Figure 6. Built-in potential distributions in temperature range 298–623 K for SiC100 and SiC250. Solid lines and open symbols refer to Vbi values calculated by C–V characteristics, while dash lines and closed symbols to Vbi values extrapolated by forward I–V characteristics.
Materials 19 00699 g006
Figure 7. Arrhenius plots of (a) donor concentration for nitrogen-doped (n-type) and (b) acceptor concentration for aluminum-doped (p+-type) 4H-SiC.
Figure 7. Arrhenius plots of (a) donor concentration for nitrogen-doped (n-type) and (b) acceptor concentration for aluminum-doped (p+-type) 4H-SiC.
Materials 19 00699 g007
Figure 8. Series resistance (a) and drift mobility (b) in the range 298–623 K.
Figure 8. Series resistance (a) and drift mobility (b) in the range 298–623 K.
Materials 19 00699 g008
Figure 9. (a) Depletion width as a function of (1/ND) 1/2 (bottom x-axis) extrapolated at −200 V. The top x-axis reports the corresponding ND. obtained by inverse transformation of the bottom axis. All data points belong to the same dataset. (b) diffusion time in the temperature range 298–623 K.
Figure 9. (a) Depletion width as a function of (1/ND) 1/2 (bottom x-axis) extrapolated at −200 V. The top x-axis reports the corresponding ND. obtained by inverse transformation of the bottom axis. All data points belong to the same dataset. (b) diffusion time in the temperature range 298–623 K.
Materials 19 00699 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mancuso, A.S.; De Luca, S.; Sangregorio, E.; Muoio, A.; Gallo, E.; Vanellone, S.; Quadrivi, E.; Trotta, A.; Calcagno, L.; Tudisco, S.; et al. High-Voltage 4H-SiC PiN Diodes: Ion Implantation vs. Epitaxial Growth for Wide-Temperature Operation. Materials 2026, 19, 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040699

AMA Style

Mancuso AS, De Luca S, Sangregorio E, Muoio A, Gallo E, Vanellone S, Quadrivi E, Trotta A, Calcagno L, Tudisco S, et al. High-Voltage 4H-SiC PiN Diodes: Ion Implantation vs. Epitaxial Growth for Wide-Temperature Operation. Materials. 2026; 19(4):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mancuso, Alfio Samuele, Saverio De Luca, Enrico Sangregorio, Annamaria Muoio, Erik Gallo, Silvia Vanellone, Eleonora Quadrivi, Antonio Trotta, Lucia Calcagno, Salvo Tudisco, and et al. 2026. "High-Voltage 4H-SiC PiN Diodes: Ion Implantation vs. Epitaxial Growth for Wide-Temperature Operation" Materials 19, no. 4: 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040699

APA Style

Mancuso, A. S., De Luca, S., Sangregorio, E., Muoio, A., Gallo, E., Vanellone, S., Quadrivi, E., Trotta, A., Calcagno, L., Tudisco, S., & La Via, F. (2026). High-Voltage 4H-SiC PiN Diodes: Ion Implantation vs. Epitaxial Growth for Wide-Temperature Operation. Materials, 19(4), 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040699

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop