Next Article in Journal
Effect of Nb Microalloying on the Dynamic Recrystallization, Bainitic Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties of Hot-Rolled Bainitic Steels
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Experimental and Computational Investigation of Salicylaldehyde-Derived Imine/Amine Derivatives as Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Agents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biodeterioration Control of the Longhu Pagoda Stone Heritage, China: Identification of Deteriogens and Evaluation of Biocidal Efficacy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Performance of Handmade Ultra-Lightweight Hanji Treated with Wet-Strength Agents for Paper-Based Cultural Heritage Conservation

1
Conservation and Restoration Center of Paper Heritage, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Wood and Paper Science, College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(18), 3986; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183986 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 August 2026 / Revised: 15 September 2026 / Accepted: 17 September 2026 / Published: 19 September 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials in Cultural Heritage Conservation)

Abstract

Ultra-lightweight paper is indispensable for conserving paper-based cultural heritage. However, machine-made thin paper (MTP) exhibits pronounced strength anisotropy caused by preferential fiber orientation. This study evaluated handmade ultra-lightweight Hanji (7.2 g/m2) produced from Broussonetia kazinoki bast fiber pulp cooked with traditional plant-ash lye and formed by the oebal method, as a potential alternative to MTP (7.0 g/m2) in paper conservation. Polyamideamine-epichlorohydrin (PAE) and glyoxylated polyacrylamide (GPAM) were applied as wet-strength agents, either alone or combined with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). The treated papers were characterized based on weight increase, dry and wet tensile index, pH, color change, and stability after accelerated aging at 80 °C and 65% relative humidity for 72 h. PAE treatment resulted in greater weight uptake than GPAM treatment, while CMC co-treatment further increased weight uptake and tensile strength for both wet-strength agents. Unlike MTP, whose cross-directional strength could not be measured, Hanji retained comparable tensile strength in both directions, reflecting its isotropic fiber network. After aging, GPAM-treated Hanji maintained a higher pH than PAE-treated Hanji and showed less color change, whereas CMC improved strength but reduced color stability. GPAM-treated handmade Hanji provides a more pH-favorable, direction-independent, and potential alternative to MTP for paper-based cultural heritage conservation.
Keywords: Hanji; Korean traditional paper; ultra-lightweight paper; conservation; cultural heritage; wet-strength agents Hanji; Korean traditional paper; ultra-lightweight paper; conservation; cultural heritage; wet-strength agents
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, S.-H.; Choi, T.-H. Performance of Handmade Ultra-Lightweight Hanji Treated with Wet-Strength Agents for Paper-Based Cultural Heritage Conservation. Materials 2026, 19, 3986. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183986

AMA Style

Lee S-H, Choi T-H. Performance of Handmade Ultra-Lightweight Hanji Treated with Wet-Strength Agents for Paper-Based Cultural Heritage Conservation. Materials. 2026; 19(18):3986. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183986

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Sang-Hyun, and Tae-Ho Choi. 2026. "Performance of Handmade Ultra-Lightweight Hanji Treated with Wet-Strength Agents for Paper-Based Cultural Heritage Conservation" Materials 19, no. 18: 3986. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183986

APA Style

Lee, S.-H., & Choi, T.-H. (2026). Performance of Handmade Ultra-Lightweight Hanji Treated with Wet-Strength Agents for Paper-Based Cultural Heritage Conservation. Materials, 19(18), 3986. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183986

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop