Microstructural and Mechanical Property Analysis of Oil Shale Semi-Coke Slag Composite Cementitious Materials
Highlights
- Preparation of a novel composite cementitious material (OSSC-GGBS) using oil shale semi-coke and granular blast furnace slag.
- The unconfined compressive strength and indirect tensile strength of OSSC-GGBS-stabilized crushed stone meet the requirements.
- The synergistic hydration mechanism formed a dense microstructure of C-S-H, C-A-H, and AFt.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Testing Methods
2.1. Raw Materials
2.2. Specimen Preparation and Mix Design
2.2.1. Mix Design
2.2.2. Preparation of Alkaline Activator
2.2.3. Preparation of Composite Cementitious Mortar
2.2.4. Preparation of Composite Cementitious Stabilized Crushed Stone Mixtures
2.3. Testing Methods
- (1)
- X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Testing
- (2)
- X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) Testing
- (3)
- Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Testing
- (4)
- Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM-EDS) Testing
- (5)
- Thermogravimetric Analysis (TG-DTG-DSC) Testing
- (6)
- Unconfined Compressive Strength
- (7)
- Indirect Tensile Strength
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Determining the Optimal Formulation Through Multi-Objective Optimization Methods
3.2. Microstructural Evolution of Composite Cementitious Materials
3.2.1. Phase Composition and Content of Hydration Products
3.2.2. Chemical Bond Analysis of Hydration Products
3.2.3. Microstructural Analysis of Composite Cementitious Materials
3.2.4. Analysis of the Hydration Heat Effect in Composite Cementitious Materials
3.2.5. pH Changes in Composite Cementitious Materials at Different Hydration Ages
3.3. Mechanical Properties of Composite Cementitious Materials
3.3.1. Unconfined Compressive Strength
3.3.2. Indirect Tensile Strength
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- Multi-objective optimization was applied to screen the optimal blending proportion of oil shale semi-coke and slag. The composite material attains 94% of the 28 d compressive strength of ordinary Portland cement mortar while reducing material costs by 63.2%. It should be noted that all microstructural and mechanical tests were conducted within a limited curing age range, and the long-term aging evolution law of the material remains to be systematically investigated.
- (2)
- The unconfined compressive strength and splitting tensile strength exhibit excellent statistical consistency, demonstrating that the developed OSSC–GGBS stabilized crushed stone mixture possesses reliable mechanical performance and favorable technological repeatability. However, this study mainly focuses on static mechanical indicators, while key pavement service performances, including dynamic fatigue resistance and frost resistance, still require further experimental verification for practical base application.
- (3)
- Multi-scale characterizations including XRD, FTIR, SEM-EDS and TG-DTG-DSC verify that the strength gain of the composite mainly originates from the rapid dissolution of amorphous aluminosilicate networks in oil shale semi-coke activated by calcium-rich ions released from granulated blast furnace slag. The synergistic reaction between the two solid wastes accelerates the formation of cross-linked C-(A)-S-H gels, constructing a dense matrix and greatly enhancing interfacial bonding strength. In follow-up research, statistical indicators such as standard deviation and coefficient of variation will be adopted to improve data analysis, combined with molecular dynamics simulations to quantify the crystallization kinetics of mineral phases and the data dispersion of multi-batch specimens.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tang, J.; Wang, Q.; Choi, G. Efficiency assessment of industrial solid waste generation and treatment processes with carry-over in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 726, 138274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Z.; Chen, H.; Du, L.; Lu, W.; Qi, K. Exploring the industrial solid wastes management system: Empirical analysis of forecasting and safeguard mechanisms. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 279, 111627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Z.; Ren, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W. Preparation, characterization and application of red mud, fly ash and desulfurized gypsum based eco-friendly road base materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 124777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, J.; Zhang, S.; Luo, K. Selenium in Chinese coal gangue: Distribution, availability, and recommendations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Jia, K. Desulfurization of flue gas by means of lignite-derived potassium humate. Fuel 2019, 252, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, Y.K.; Jung, S.H.; Choi, Y.C. Effects of chemical composition of fly ash on compressive strength of fly ash cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 204, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turgut, P.; Demir, F. The influence of disposed fly ash on Ca2+ leaching and physico-mechanical properties of mortars. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 226, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gartner, E. Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 1489–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, N.; Song, Y.; Wang, Z.; He, C.; Ruan, S. Utilization of silt, sludge, and industrial waste residues in building materials: A review. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2022, 20, 22808000221114709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taurino, R.; Bondioli, F.; Messori, M. Use of different kinds of waste in the construction of new polymer composites. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 21, 100298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Jiménez, A.; García-Lodeiro, I.; Palomo, A. Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 3055–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, X.; Xi, J.; Li, C.; Jiang, X.W. Preparation and application of the cement-free steel slag cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 114, 874–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Z.; Qian, Z.; Lu, X.; Yue, B.; Su, W.; Tian, M. Optimal Design and Application of Universal Cementitious Material Prepared Using Full Industrial Solid Wastes. Materials 2025, 18, 3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ZenLi, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Lin, C.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C. Feasibility of preparing red mud-based cementitious materials: Synergistic utilization of industrial solid waste, waste heat, and tail gas. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 124896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, C.; Xu, C.C. Synergistic utilization of blast furnace slag with other industrial solid wastes in cement and concrete industry: Synergistic mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Green Energy Resour. 2023, 1, 100012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, C.; Li, Y.; Ma, S. Synergistic preparation of high-performance composite blast furnace slag powder from multiple industrial solid wastes: Performance regulation and optimization. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Xie, L.; Kong, D.; Peng, D.; Zheng, T. Research on optimizing performance of desulfurization-gypsum-based composite cementitious materials based on response surface method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 341, 127874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snellings, R.; Salze, A.; Scrivener, K.L. Use of X-ray diffraction to quantify amorphous supplementary cementitious materials in anhydrous and hydrated blended cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 64, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Corr, D.J.; Han, B.; Shah, S.P. Investigating the effect of carbon nanotube on early age hydration of cementitious composites with isothermal calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 107, 103513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Saout, G.; Füllmann, T.; Kocaba, V.; Scrivener, K. Quantitative study of cementitious materials by X-ray diffraction/Rietveld analysis using an external standard. In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Montréal, QC, Canada, 8–13 July 2007; pp. 8–13. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes, T.L.; Methven, C.M.; Jones, T.G.J.; Pelham, S.E.; Fletcher, P.; Hall, C. Determining cement composition by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 1995, 2, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, C.; Zheng, B.; Li, Y.; Yang, Q. Preparation of alkali-activated oil shale residue-slag geopolymer-based binder using calcium carbide slag and sodium carbonate as alkali activator. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0317341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, Y.; Dou, H.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Q.; He, T.; Mu, B.; Wang, A. An exploration of oil shale semi-coke recycling utilization: High temperature activation mechanism and cementitious material precursor preparation. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 104, 112288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheshadri, A.; Marathe, S.; Rodrigues, A.P.; Fernandes, R.; Sadowski, Ł. Synergy of industrial wastes in eco-friendly, air-cured alkali activated pavement concrete composites: Properties, embodied carbon and energy assessment and modelling. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2026, 27, 431–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stutzman, P. Scanning electron microscopy imaging of hydraulic cement microstructure. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2004, 26, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco, F.; Christ, R.; Gil, A.M.; Tutikian, B.F. SEM and 3D microtomography application to investigate the distribution of fibers in advanced cementitious composites. Rev. Ibracon Estrut. Mater. 2016, 9, 824–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palou, M.; Boháč, M.; Kuzielova, E.; Novotný, R.; Žemlička, M.; Dragomirová, J. Use of calorimetry and thermal analysis to assess the heat of supplementary cementitious materials during the hydration of composite cementitious binders. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2020, 142, 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Fang, P.; Wang, H.; Kong, Y.; Ouyang, L. Effect of tuff powder on the hydration properties of composite cementitious materials. Powder Technol. 2021, 380, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Ye, Z.; Wu, J.; Yang, Q.; Li, Q.; Kong, X. Impact of triethanolamine on the hydration of Portland cement in the presence of high pozzolanic activity supplementary cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2024, 147, 105435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McPolin, D.O.; Basheer, P.A.; Long, A.E.; Grattan, K.T.; Sun, T. New test method to obtain pH profiles due to carbonation of concretes containing supplementary cementitious materials. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2007, 19, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McPolin, D.O.; Basheer, P.A.; Long, A.E. Carbonation and pH in mortars manufactured with supplementary cementitious materials. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2009, 21, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruffolo, R.M.; Shakoor, A. Variability of unconfined compressive strength in relation to number of test samples. Eng. Geol. 2009, 108, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Huang, D.; Liu, Z.; Lu, Y. Mechanical properties, micro-mechanisms, and constitutive models of seawater sea-sand engineered cementitious composites. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 94, 109987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazir, R.; Momeni, E.; Armaghani, D.J.; Amin, M.M. Correlation between unconfined compressive strength and indirect tensile strength of limestone rock samples. Electron J. Geotech. Eng. 2013, 18, 1737–1746. [Google Scholar]
- Cassina, G.; Fischer, J.; Rohr, N. Correlation between flexural and indirect tensile strength of resin composite cements. Head. Face Med. 2016, 12, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]













| Component | Unit | SiO2 | CaO | Al2O3 | MgO | SO3 | TiO2 | BaO | Fe2O3 | K2O | Na2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-coke | (%) | 53.62 | 3.60 | 29.29 | 2.30 | 0.66 | 1.12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Slag | (%) | 37.21 | 34.21 | 12.32 | 8.51 | 2.53 | 1.19 | 1.15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cement | (%) | 23.91 | 57.66 | 6.64 | 2.44 | 4.07 | 0 | 0 | 3.17 | 0.93 | 0.67 |
| Inspection Items | Unit | Standard Requirements | Test Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | - | Colorless or slightly tinted transparent/translucent viscous liquid | Light-colored, transparent, viscous liquid |
| Na2O Content | % | ≥12.8 | 13.73 |
| SiO2 Content | % | ≥29.2 | 32.35 |
| Modulus | - | 2.20–2.50 | 2.43 |
| Baume degree (20 °C) | °Bé | 48.5–52.5 | 50 |
| Group | Cement Content (%) | OSSC:GGBS Mass Ratio | Water Glass Modulus | Water Glass Dosage (%) | Water-to-Binder Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 4:6 | 1.4 | 10 | 0.42 |
| 2 | 15 | 3:7 | 1.4 | 10 | 0.42 |
| 3 | 15 | 2:8 | 1.4 | 10 | 0.42 |
| Factor/Response | Goal | 1 | 2 | Importance (+++ Represents Importance) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
| A: (OSSC:GGBS Ratio) | Range | 6:4 | 8:2 | 6:4 | 8:2 | +++ |
| B: Cement Content (%) | Range | 10% | 20% | 10% | 20% | +++ |
| C: Water Glass Modulus | Range | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | +++ |
| D: Water Glass Dosage (%) | Range | 8% | 12% | 8% | 12% | +++ |
| Y1: Compressive Strength (MPa) | Maximize | 26.6 | 37 | 26.6 | 37 | +++ |
| Y2: Flexural Strength (MPa) | Maximize | 4.5 | 6.6 | 4.5 | 6.6 | +++ |
| Response Combination | Predicted Value | Measured Value | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination 1 (OSSC:GGBS = 8:2, Cement = 20%, Modulus = 1.4, Dosage = 10%) | - | - | - |
| Compressive Strength (MPa) | 37.00 | 37.10 | 0.27 |
| Flexural Strength (MPa) | 7.20 | 7.22 | 0.27 |
| Combination 2 (OSSC:GGBS = 3:7, Cement = 15%, Modulus = 1.4, Dosage = 10%) | - | - | - |
| Compressive Strength (MPa) | 37.37 | 37.50 | 0.35 |
| Flexural Strength (MPa) | 7.05 | 7.04 | 0.14 |
| Cementitious Material | Cost (RMB/t) | 7-Day Strength (MPa) | 28-Day Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Portland Cement (PO 42.5) | 450 | 23.52 | 39.3 |
| OSSC-GGBS Combination 1 | 188.8 | 20.80 | 37.1 |
| OSSC-GGBS Combination 2 (Optimal) | 165.4 | 21.0 | 37.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, B.; Zhou, X.; Chen, T.; Yang, Z.; Sha, M.; Li, L.; Li, L. Microstructural and Mechanical Property Analysis of Oil Shale Semi-Coke Slag Composite Cementitious Materials. Materials 2026, 19, 3303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19153303
Li B, Zhou X, Chen T, Yang Z, Sha M, Li L, Li L. Microstructural and Mechanical Property Analysis of Oil Shale Semi-Coke Slag Composite Cementitious Materials. Materials. 2026; 19(15):3303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19153303
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Bo, Xiang Zhou, Tao Chen, Zhenhua Yang, Mingyu Sha, Lianwei Li, and Liangying Li. 2026. "Microstructural and Mechanical Property Analysis of Oil Shale Semi-Coke Slag Composite Cementitious Materials" Materials 19, no. 15: 3303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19153303
APA StyleLi, B., Zhou, X., Chen, T., Yang, Z., Sha, M., Li, L., & Li, L. (2026). Microstructural and Mechanical Property Analysis of Oil Shale Semi-Coke Slag Composite Cementitious Materials. Materials, 19(15), 3303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19153303

