Next Article in Journal
Multi-Parameter Collaborative Optimization of Foamed Asphalt Cold Recycling Mixture Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Fiber Reinforcement Effects on Coal Gangue Concrete: A Review of Mechanical Properties, Durability and Sustainability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Preparation, Hydration Characteristics, and Carbon Footprint Assessment of Sulfoaluminate Cement Prepared by Co-Utilization of Industrial Solid Wastes and Bauxite

1
Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
2
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(10), 2122; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19102122
Submission received: 15 April 2026 / Revised: 8 May 2026 / Accepted: 13 May 2026 / Published: 18 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

This study evaluates the technical feasibility, environmental sustainability, and economic viability of producing sulfoaluminate cement (SW-SAC) by co-utilizing bauxite and industrial solid wastes—phosphogypsum, calcium carbide residue (CCR), and red mud—with the solid wastes accounting for approximately 75% of the raw meal. CCR replaces limestone as the primary CaO source, releasing H2O instead of CO2, while phosphogypsum supplies SO3; the raw meal is directly calcined in a single step at 1300–1350 °C, 100–150 °C below that of ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Calcination temperature and holding time were optimized through phase analysis, microstructural observation, free lime (f-CaO) determination, and strength testing. SW-SAC meeting the 42.5 strength class was then prepared using phosphogypsum as a setting regulator and phosphorus slag or limestone powder as Supplementary materials. X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry (TG), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to examine hydration products and microstructural evolution. The optimized clinker was dominated by ye’elimite (C4A3)  and belite (C2S). Phosphorus slag favored the formation of gel-like products at later ages, whereas limestone powder promoted ettringite (AFt) stabilization and monocarboaluminate (Mc) formation. SW-SAC exhibited a lower carbon footprint than both Type P·I Portland cement and conventional SAC, and a lower production cost than conventional SAC. These results demonstrate a promising low-carbon route for high-value utilization of industrial solid wastes.
Keywords: sulfoaluminate cement; phosphogypsum; calcium carbide residue; calcination regime; strength; hydration; carbon footprint sulfoaluminate cement; phosphogypsum; calcium carbide residue; calcination regime; strength; hydration; carbon footprint

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, Y.; Miao, X.; Gao, D.; Fan, C. Preparation, Hydration Characteristics, and Carbon Footprint Assessment of Sulfoaluminate Cement Prepared by Co-Utilization of Industrial Solid Wastes and Bauxite. Materials 2026, 19, 2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19102122

AMA Style

Peng Y, Miao X, Gao D, Fan C. Preparation, Hydration Characteristics, and Carbon Footprint Assessment of Sulfoaluminate Cement Prepared by Co-Utilization of Industrial Solid Wastes and Bauxite. Materials. 2026; 19(10):2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19102122

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Yanzhou, Xiaohang Miao, Dejun Gao, and Chunhu Fan. 2026. "Preparation, Hydration Characteristics, and Carbon Footprint Assessment of Sulfoaluminate Cement Prepared by Co-Utilization of Industrial Solid Wastes and Bauxite" Materials 19, no. 10: 2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19102122

APA Style

Peng, Y., Miao, X., Gao, D., & Fan, C. (2026). Preparation, Hydration Characteristics, and Carbon Footprint Assessment of Sulfoaluminate Cement Prepared by Co-Utilization of Industrial Solid Wastes and Bauxite. Materials, 19(10), 2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19102122

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop