3.2. Characterization of Al2O3, AlN, and h-BN
The FT-IR and XRD spectra of the three fillers are shown in
Figure 4.
Figure 4a illustrates the FT-IR spectrum of h-BN, exhibiting characteristic peaks at 783 cm
−1 and 1373 cm
−1, corresponding to the in-plane B-N stretching vibration and out-of-plane B-N bending vibration, respectively. The characteristic peaks of Si-(CH
2)
3 and Si-O-CH
3 stretching vibrations are 1021 cm
−1 and 1104 cm
−1, respectively, indicating the successful modification of h-BN by KH550 solution. The FT-IR spectrum of treated Al
2O
3, as shown in
Figure 4b, shows characteristic peaks at 634 cm
−1, 1651 cm
−1, and 3462 cm
−1, corresponding to Si-O-Al, N-H, and -CH
2-, respectively. The result confirms successful grafting of KH550 onto micrometer-sized Al
2O
3. The similar characteristic peaks are observed in treated micron-sized AlN, indicating that AlN was successfully modified by KH550.
The XRD spectra of the three micrometer powders are shown in
Figure 4d–f. The diffraction peaks of all three powders remain unchanged after treatment with KH550, indicating that the surface modification by KH550 does not affect the crystal structures of h-BN, Al
2O
3, and AlN.
3.3. Comprehensive Performance of BN-AlN
Figure 5 shows the comprehensive performance of the composites, including thermal conductivity, hardness, and resistivity. The variation in thermal conductivity of the composites at different filler loadings is depicted in
Figure 5a. It is evident that the thermal conductivity of the composites increases with the rise in filler content. This is because the incorporation of high thermal conductivity fillers contributes to enhancing the thermal conductivity of the matrix. Furthermore, as the filler loading increases, thermally conductive fillers come into contact within the matrix, forming continuous thermal conduction pathways that enhance heat transfer performance. Notably, at the same filler loading, the BN-AlN composite exhibits the highest thermal conductivity, followed by BN-Al
2O
3, while the AlN/Al
2O
3 sample shows the lowest value. This improvement stems from the 2D h-BN filler, which constructs interconnected networks among 0D particles, thereby extending heat transfer channels and boosting thermal conduction. Additionally, due to AlN’s inherently higher thermal conductivity compared to Al
2O
3, samples incorporating AlN demonstrate superior heat transfer performance. At a 30 wt% filler loading, the thermal conductivity of BN-AlN reaches 1.278 W/m·K, representing a 7.1%, 21.4%, and 25.2% increase compared to the BN-Al
2O
3, AlN, and Al
2O
3 composites, respectively.
To further clarify the enhancement mechanism of thermal conductivity, the Agari model [
33] was used to evaluate the effect of the thermal conduction pathways formed by the filler on thermal conductivity:
where
λ and
λ1 represent the thermal conductivities of the composite material and the polymer matrix, respectively;
λn denotes the thermal conductivities of the filler particles;
Xn are the statistical fractions of each filler in the total mixed fillers, and the sum of all items equals 1.
C1 is the factor affecting the crystallinity and crystal size of the polymer;
Cn are the free factors for the formation of thermal conductive chains by filler particles, reflecting the difficulty level of forming thermal conductive chains by the fillers.
V is the volume fraction of the filler in the composite, which is calculated by the following formula:
where m
1 and
ρ1 represent the mass and density of the matrix material, respectively; m
n and
ρn denote the mass and density of the filler particles, respectively. In this study, the thermal conductivities and densities of all materials and fillers are provided in
Appendix A Table A3.
The calculated C2 and C3 values for the BN-AlN scheme, BN-Al2O3 scheme, AlN scheme, and Al2O3 scheme are (0.40, 0.44), (0.35, 0.42), (0.22, 0), and (0.35, 0), respectively. The C2 and C3 values of the multi-scale filler schemes are all higher than the single-filler schemes, indicating that fillers of different scales can promote each other in forming thermal conductive networks, thereby improving the thermal conductivity of the composites. Compared with the BN-Al2O3 scheme, the BN-AlN scheme has better C2 and C3 values, which means that AlN powder has a more significant promoting effect on the formation of thermal conductive pathways by the main filler (BN powder). Therefore, the BN-AlN composite exhibits higher thermal conductivity.
For industrial motors, hardness is also a critical indicator to evaluate the suitability of potting material. As shown in
Figure 5b, the hardness of the composites BN-AlN decreases with the gradual increase in filler loading. This is because higher filler content weakens the interfacial bonding strength between the filler and the epoxy resin, which affects the hardness of composites. At a 30 wt% filler load, the hardness of the composite BN-AlN is only 56 HA, which fails to meet the hardness requirements (80–90 HA) for high-precision ACLSM potting adhesive. Therefore, 25 wt% is an optimal filler loading, providing both a high thermal conductivity (1.182 W/m·K, an increase of 48.7% compared to the matrix 381-4DZ) and satisfied hardness (80 HA).
Based on the determined filler loading, the effect of the h-BN and AlN mixing ratio on the thermal conductivity of the composites was investigated. As shown in
Figure 5c, the thermal conductivity of the composites first increased and then decreased as the proportion of h-BN improved. The maximum thermal conductivity is achieved at a h-BN: AlN ratio of 4:1. Because the small size and large specific surface area of h-BN facilitate dispersion within the matrix, enhancing the thermal properties of the composites. However, reducing AlN excessively decreases the thermal conductive pathways in the vertical direction, lowering the thermal conductivity of the composites. Therefore, in this experiment, the h-BN: AlN mixing ratio of 4:1 is the optimal ratio for the filler combination.
The volume resistivity of the composites is presented in
Figure 5d. As filler loading increases, the resistivity decreases. Microdefects at the interface between fillers and epoxy resin molecules induce localized electric field concentrations, resulting in defect breakdown under high voltage. In addition, the industrial-grade BN and AlN powders contain certain impurities, which also affect the volume resistivity of the material. However, both BN and AlN possess excellent insulating properties, so they have little impact on the volume resistivity of the composite. At a 25 wt% filler loading, the composite exhibits a volume resistivity of 1.87 × 10
11 Ω·cm, which is lower than the matrix 381-4DZ but still satisfies the insulation requirement for the DU4-S1-TL120 linear motor (
ρᵥ ≥ 1 × 10
11 Ω·cm).
3.6. Thermal Management Performance Analysis
Figure 8 shows the temperature changes in the ACLSM windings with two schemes. As shown in
Figure 8a, the BN-AlN scheme consistently exhibits lower temperatures under different power loads. At the rated condition of 35 W, the highest temperature of the BN-AlN scheme is only 101.42 °C, which is 8.82 °C lower than the 381-4DZ scheme. This demonstrates that the composites with high thermal conductivity enhance the heat dissipation of windings. As shown in
Figure 8b, the improvement of the BN-AlN scheme in reducing temperature difference becomes more pronounced as the power load increases. At 35 W, the temperature difference in the BN-AlN scheme is 7.15 °C, observing a 29.8% reduction compared to the 381-4DZ scheme.
The infrared images of two schemes under varying power loads are shown in
Figure 8c,d. The temperature rises and temperature difference in the windings are significantly decreased with the BN-AlN scheme, demonstrating that the BN-AlN potting adhesive effectively optimizes the heating transfer of the ACLSM windings and enhances thermal management performance.
Figure 9 illustrates the effect of coolant temperature on the BN-AlN scheme. At the same heating power, increasing the coolant temperature results in higher winding temperature but lower temperature difference. For example, at 35 W, when the coolant temperature is 50 °C, 40 °C, 30 °C, and 20 °C, the maximum temperatures of winding are 119.10 °C, 112.69 °C, 101.44 °C, and 94.22 °C, respectively. The corresponding temperature differences are 4.39 °C, 5.23 °C, 6.68 °C, and 7.46 °C, respectively. Lower coolant temperatures enhance the efficiency of thermal conduction and convection, allowing more heat to be effectively dissipated. However, due to the limited thermal conductivity of the potting compound, the improvement in the efficiency of heat transfer from NSW to the FSW is not significant. Therefore, when the cooling temperature decreases, the heat exchange efficiency of NSW increases, while the heat of FSW is still dissipated through inefficient heat conduction and convection, resulting in an increased temperature difference.
In addition, the winding temperature does not decrease proportionally as the coolant temperature is reduced. At 35 W, when the coolant temperature decreases from 50 °C to 20 °C, the maximum winding temperature decreases by 6.41 °C, 11.25 °C, and 7.22 °C, respectively. Therefore, to balance the cooling performance of the windings and minimize cooling energy consumption, the optimal coolant temperature in this study is set to 30 °C.
Figure 10 shows the effect of the coolant flow rate on the BN-AlN scheme. At the same heating power, increasing the coolant flow rate results in lower winding temperature but higher temperature difference. At the optimal coolant temperature of 30 °C, when the coolant flow rate exceeds 2.4 L/min, the improvement in maximum temperature and temperature difference in winding is less noticeable. When the coolant flow rate is below 2.4 L/min, the maximum winding temperature exceeds the allowable temperature of the winding (110 ± 2 °C). Therefore, at the optimal coolant temperature, the better coolant flow rate is 2.4 L/min.
3.7. Economic Analysis
To comprehensively evaluate the commercial viability of BN-AlN,
Figure 11 presents an analysis of the economic and thermal performance of BN-AlN, using the cost of 381-4DZ as the 100% standard. In this experiment, the following were defined: the increase in thermal conductivity and the cost of BN-AlN are calculated based on the performance of samples under two adjacent filler loadings, while the average increase in thermal conductivity is obtained by dividing the thermal conductivity of the sample under the maximum loading (30 wt%) by the loading gradient. In this experiment, the average increase in thermal conductivity is 10.12%.
The cost calculation of 381-4DZ is as follows:
where
M refers to the mass fraction of filler loading,
PM represents the cost of BN-AlN material under the filler loading of
M;
P0,
PBN, and
PAlN correspond to the costs of matrix 381-4DZ, filler BN, and AlN, respectively.
It can be obtained through calculation that when the filler loading of the sample increases by 5 wt% each time, the variation value of each component remains constant, and the cost increase is 5 Yuan per kilogram. As the filler loading amount increases, the cost increases in BN-AlN are 6.25%, 5.88%, 5.60%, 5.26%, 5.00% and 4.76%, respectively. (The costs of main materials are shown in
Appendix A Table A4, and the costs of BN-AlN materials under different filler loadings are shown in
Appendix A Table A5)
As shown in
Figure 11a, it can be observed that at low filler loadings, the increase in thermal conductivity is relatively low, significantly below the theoretical average. As the filler content further increases, the thermal conductivity improvement rises substantially, reaching its peak at 25 wt% loading. Therefore, under a uniform increase in cost, the 25 wt% sample exhibits the highest increase in thermal conductivity and thus the optimal economic efficiency. Combined with the physical performance analysis of the samples in
Section 3.3, it can be concluded that the sample with 25 wt% filler loading exhibits the best overall performance and economic characteristics.
Figure 11b compares the cost and thermal conductivity of different commercial motor potting adhesives. BN-AlN achieves superior thermal performance at a lower cost. This solution provides a novel strategy for the design of commercial motor potting adhesives.