Next Article in Journal
Manufacturing and Application of Low-Cost Potting Adhesive with High Thermal Conductivity
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete Using Explainable Machine Learning Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Pre-Treatment with Desensitizing Agents on the Effectiveness of In-Office Bleaching: An In Vitro Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surface Texture, Wettability and Tribological Behavior of Titanium Nitride-Based Coatings Deposited on Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy

Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(21), 5010; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18215010
Submission received: 15 October 2025 / Revised: 30 October 2025 / Accepted: 31 October 2025 / Published: 3 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface Properties and Surface Characterization of Dental Materials)

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of two titanium nitride-based coatings, TiCN and TiN:Ag, deposited on Ti6Al4V alloy by physical vapour deposition (PVD). The investigation focused on the characterisation of surface geometric structure and wettability, tribological parameters, and osseointegration. The purpose of the study was to obtain a better understanding of the interactions between the implant surface and the surrounding tissues and body fluids, which are essential for ensuring long-term durability. The results revealed significant differences in surface stereometric parameters between the coatings, with TiN:Ag exhibiting higher roughness values. These variations were reflected in the wettability tests, where the coating with a more developed surface topography (TiN:Ag) demonstrated contact angle values approximately 15% higher than those of TiCN. In contrast, tribological tests indicated superior performance of the TiCN coating, which exhibited lower coefficients of friction in artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8—reduced by 20% and 36%, respectively, compared with TiN:Ag. The findings confirmed that surface topography exerts a decisive influence on both wettability and tribological behaviour of the coatings, aspects that must be considered in their design for implantological applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The dynamic development of dental implantology has resulted in an increasing demand for materials that ensure both functionality and long-term durability in the oral environment, which is characterised by variable pH, the presence of enzymes, proteins and microorganisms, as well as cyclic mechanical loading. Frequent implant failures associated with wear, loosening, instability or infection [1,2] have prompted the development of novel material solutions aimed at improving implant longevity and reliability through the enhancement of surface tribological and mechanical properties. According to literature data [3], the pH of saliva usually ranges between 6 and 7; however, it may decrease following the consumption of acidic foods or beverages, leading to the degradation of titanium surfaces, breakdown of the passive oxide layer and accelerated corrosion, which consequently promotes higher friction and wear. At the same time, salivary proteins such as mucin and albumin, as well as lipids and glycoproteins, may provide a protective effect by partially mitigating these processes, which underlines the significance of the chemical and biological environment in implant durability.
Previous studies have reported on functional coatings designed to reduce wear and to improve the resistance of implant surfaces to mechanical and biological factors. Ceramic coatings based on titanium carbonitride (TiCN) doped with silver (Ag) demonstrated a substantial reduction in friction coefficient and material loss under lubrication with simulated body fluids (HBSS) and HBSS supplemented with bovine serum albumin, with the effect being particularly pronounced on hydrophobic surfaces [4]. Similarly, Ti–C–N coatings deposited by the PVD cathodic arc process improved the wear resistance and reduced the friction coefficient of Ti6Al4V alloy [5]. In addition, TiCN coatings obtained by PVD exhibited a beneficial influence on tribological performance, reducing both the coefficient of friction and volumetric wear when tested under lubrication with artificial saliva [6].
Parallel studies have been conducted on carbide and metallic coatings such as diamond-like carbon (DLC), graphite-like carbon (GLC), TiN and Ta. These analyses included the evaluation of hardness, elastic modulus, hardness-to-modulus ratio and tribological performance in protein-based solutions simulating synovial fluid (diluted bovine serum). The tantalum coating exhibited the lowest wear coefficient under high contact loads, whereas DLC and TiN coatings were limited by internal stresses, susceptibility to delamination and reduced resistance to cyclic loading. The results of these studies indicate that the effectiveness of coatings depends not only on their chemical composition but also on deposition parameters, adhesion to the substrate, coating uniformity and their synergistic interaction with body fluids and adsorbed proteins [7].
The current challenges in dental implantology, including variable pH, the presence of enzymes, proteins and microorganisms, as well as cyclic mechanical loading in the oral cavity, necessitate the development of new materials resistant to corrosion, wear and infection [8,9,10,11]. Research on ceramic coatings such as silver-doped TiCN and the evaluation of their tribological and mechanical properties represents a promising direction for the development of durable and reliable dental implants. Despite extensive studies, there remains a lack of data on the behaviour of these coatings under conditions simulating the oral environment, particularly in the presence of artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8, corresponding to physiological fluctuations of oral pH. Assessment of tribological performance under such conditions is crucial for dental implantology, as it enables a more realistic simulation of in vivo implant conditions and a more accurate evaluation of their durability and wear resistance. The present study addresses this research gap and aims to optimise the performance of TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings for dental applications, thereby enhancing their clinical potential and safety.

2. Materials and Methods

Two titanium nitride-based coatings, TiCN and TiN:Ag (Table 1), were deposited on a Ti6Al4V titanium alloy substrate, which is widely used in implantology owing to its favourable strength-to-weight ratio and high biocompatibility [6,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The coatings were produced using the physical vapour deposition (PVD) technique, which enables control of the chemical composition and layer thickness while ensuring good adhesion to the substrate. To guarantee process repeatability and coating quality, the deposition was carried out under controlled cleanroom conditions by an external company specialising in PVD technologies. Information regarding the type of PVD process and deposition temperature was provided; however, detailed technological parameters are proprietary to the manufacturer and were not disclosed. In the case of the TiN:Ag coating, silver was introduced into the reactive atmosphere as a dopant, imparting antibacterial properties to the deposited layer. The Ti6Al4V alloy without coating was not tested in the experimental programme, as its tribological properties have been extensively reported in the literature [6,18,19,20], where it was shown to exhibit high wear under both dry friction and lubrication in fluids simulating body conditions.
In the present study, the surface texture (Section 3.1) and wettability (Section 3.2) were analysed, as these parameters exert a considerable influence on tribological behaviour (Section 3.3). The evaluation of these features allows a better understanding of the interaction between the implant surface and the surrounding tissues and body fluids, which is crucial for osseointegration and, consequently, for the functional durability of implants [21,22]. The detailed experimental methodology is summarised in Table 2, and an example of the tribological test configuration is shown in Figure 1. After the completion of tribological tests, the wear tracks were examined microscopically (Section 3.3).

3. Results

3.1. Microstructure and Surface Texture Results

The geometric structure of the surface was analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 2) and confocal microscopy (Figure 3). The confocal microscope provided three-dimensional axonometric images, material contribution (Abbott–Firestone) curves, averaged primary profiles, and amplitude parameters (Table 3). The material contribution curves and the parameters extracted from them—namely the reduced peak height (Spk), reduced valley depth (Svk), and core roughness depth (Sk)—were used to further characterise the functional surface features (Table 4). All measurements were performed in accordance with the relevant standard [23].
Based on the analysis of SEM images, axonometric views, surface profiles, and roughness parameters, the TiN:Ag coating exhibited a more developed surface topography compared with the TiCN coating. The arithmetic mean height (Sa) for TiCN was 0.1 μm, whereas for TiN:Ag it was approximately twice as high. A similar trend was observed for the remaining height parameters, including the root mean square height (Sq), maximum peak height (Sp), and maximum valley depth (Sv), indicating the presence of more numerous and diverse surface irregularities in the silver-doped coating. These differences were also reflected in the statistical parameters—skewness (Ssk) and kurtosis (Sku). In both coatings, Ssk values were positive and Sku exceeded 3. This combination of parameters indicates the presence of deep valleys and sharp peaks with steep slopes, confirming a more irregular surface topography for the TiN:Ag coating.
The surface topography analysis of TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings included both height parameters and the material distribution characteristics described by the Abbott–Firestone curve. This curve illustrates the percentage contribution of individual height levels within the surface profile, enabling assessment of the relative proportions of peaks, core region, and valleys. Parameters derived from this curve, including the core roughness depth (Sk), reduced peak height (Spk), and reduced valley depth (Svk), provide information on the load-bearing capacity and lubricant retention capability of the surface, allowing a preliminary estimation of its tribological behaviour.
The results demonstrated that the TiN:Ag coating possessed higher roughness and a more developed geometric structure compared with the TiCN coating. This was confirmed by the higher values of amplitude parameters such as Sa, Sq, Sp, and Sv, as well as by positive skewness (Ssk) and kurtosis (Sku) values exceeding 3, which indicate the presence of sharp peaks and deep valleys. The parameters obtained from the material ratio curve corroborated these observations. The TiN:Ag coating exhibited higher Spk and Sk values, indicating the occurrence of numerous prominent peaks that may be gradually worn during the running-in phase before a stable contact surface is formed. Furthermore, a higher Svk value was observed for TiN:Ag, suggesting an enhanced ability to retain lubricants, which could improve its tribological performance under long-term operating conditions [24,25,26].

3.2. Contact Angle

The wettability of the coating surfaces was assessed by measuring the contact angle (CA), defined as the angle formed between the solid surface and the tangent to a liquid droplet at the point of contact between the solid, liquid, and gaseous phases. Lower contact angle values correspond to higher surface wettability [27,28,29]. The measurements were performed using the sessile drop method. A 5 µL droplet of artificial saliva solution with pH values of 5.8 and 6.8 was deposited on the surface of each coating. The tests were carried out under controlled laboratory conditions (temperature 23 ± 1 °C, relative humidity 55 ± 5%). For each coating, ten independent measurements were conducted, and the average contact angle values were calculated (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Wettability tests performed using artificial saliva solutions at pH 5.8 and 6.8 revealed distinct differences in surface behaviour between the analysed coatings. For artificial saliva at pH 5.8, the contact angle measured for the TiCN coating was 63°, while for the TiN:Ag coating it reached 77°. At pH 6.8, the contact angle for TiCN remained at 63°, whereas TiN:Ag exhibited a slightly lower value of 72°. These results indicate a more hydrophilic character of the TiCN surface compared with the silver-doped TiN coating under both test conditions. The greater surface roughness of the TiN:Ag coating, confirmed by the topographic analysis and roughness parameters (e.g., higher Sa, Spk, Svk values), likely contributed to the increased contact angle. According to the Wenzel and Cassie–Baxter models, surface roughness can enhance both hydrophilic and hydrophobic behaviour, depending on the intrinsic wettability of the material. In the case of TiN:Ag, the more developed surface structure appears to reinforce its hydrophobic tendency [30]. Both coatings exhibited hydrophilic behaviour, with contact angle values below 90°, a range generally considered favourable for osteoblast adhesion and proliferation. Previous studies have shown that moderately hydrophilic surfaces—characterised by contact angles within this range—facilitate protein adsorption, promote osteoblast differentiation, and accelerate early osseointegration processes [31,32,33].

3.3. Tribological Properties and Assessment of Surface Geometric Structure After Tribological Tests

Tribological tests were performed to determine the coefficient of friction (µ) and the wear intensity index (WV). Representative friction coefficient curves are shown in Figure 6, and the average values calculated from three measurement series are presented in Figure 7. Following the tests, the wear tracks were analysed using confocal microscopy. Based on the 3D axonometric images (Figure 8a), average wear profiles were generated (Figure 8b), and the cross-sectional wear area and wear depth (h) were determined. Based on the results of these tests, the volumetric wear index (Figure 9) was calculated using formula [34]: WV = V/(FN × S), where V-volume of material removed, mm3; FN–normal force, N; S–distance, m. These measurements enabled a quantitative evaluation of material loss and provided a basis for the comparative analysis of wear mechanisms operating on the examined coatings. Differences in the morphology and depth of the wear tracks offered insights into the dominant frictional interactions and the processes responsible for material degradation.
Tribological tests demonstrated that the TiCN coating exhibited lower coefficients of friction compared with the TiN:Ag coating under lubrication with artificial saliva at both pH 5.8 and 6.8. The measured friction values were approximately 20% and 36% lower, respectively. These differences are most likely associated with the higher surface roughness of the Ag-doped TiN coating. The reduced friction observed for the TiCN coating may result from the combined effect of two factors: the lubricating action of carbon present in the coating structure and the favourable mechanical properties of TiCN, including its high elastic modulus. The mechanical characteristics of both coatings, such as hardness and elastic modulus, have been comprehensively analysed in previous studies [35], which confirmed the superior mechanical performance of TiCN. Additionally, all tested samples exhibited a markedly unstable coefficient of friction throughout the measurement. This behaviour may be attributed to local electrochemical interactions between ions in the artificial saliva and the coating surface, as well as to differences in surface roughness between the examined materials.
Microscopic examination of the sample surfaces after tribological testing revealed that the TiCN coating exhibited significantly higher wear resistance than the TiN:Ag coating. This trend was consistent under both lubrication conditions, using artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8. No delamination or complete detachment of the coating from the substrate was observed in any of the analysed cases, as confirmed by the wear track profiles (Figure 8b). The depth of the wear tracks did not exceed the coating thickness, indicating that both layers remained intact throughout the tribological tests. According to previously reported data [35], the TiCN coating thickness was approximately 2.5 µm, whereas the TiN:Ag coating reached about 4.5 µm. These results further confirm the strong adhesion of both coatings to the Ti6Al4V substrate and their high resistance to tribological wear. Such characteristics are essential for applications requiring long-term durability and stability, particularly in dental implant components.
The volumetric wear index of the TiCN coating was approximately 52% and 41% lower than that of the TiN:Ag coating under lubrication with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8, respectively. Both coatings exhibited more pronounced wear in the environment with pH 6.8—by about 50% and 37%, respectively—indicating the influence of the chemical composition of the lubricating medium on wear behaviour.
The superior tribological performance of the TiCN coating can be attributed to the presence of carbon in its structure, which provides self-lubricating properties and contributes to reduced friction and wear. Furthermore, the high hardness and elastic modulus of TiCN [35] enhance its resistance to deformation and surface damage. The combination of these effects results in improved durability under cyclic loading conditions.
These results confirm that TiCN coatings exhibit strong potential for dental implant applications, where high wear resistance and stable frictional behaviour are essential for long-term functionality and clinical reliability.

4. Conclusions

The conducted analyses demonstrated clear differences in surface morphology, wettability, and tribological behaviour between the TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings. The TiN:Ag coating exhibited a more developed and irregular topography, characterised by higher roughness parameters and the presence of sharp surface asperities, which contributed to increased friction during the initial stages of sliding. In contrast, the smoother TiCN coating showed lower coefficients of friction under lubrication with artificial saliva at both pH 5.8 and 6.8—by approximately 20% and 36%, respectively. The superior tribological performance of the TiCN coating is likely associated with the presence of carbon within its structure, which provides additional self-lubricating effects. Wettability measurements confirmed that TiCN was more hydrophilic than TiN:Ag, a result consistent with its smoother surface morphology. Both coatings exhibited increased wear in the neutral saliva environment (pH 6.8), indicating that the chemical composition and pH of the lubricating medium influence the prevailing wear mechanisms. For TiCN, wear increased by about 50%, while for TiN:Ag it rose by approximately 37%. Microscopic examination further revealed that TiCN displayed superior wear resistance, with a volumetric wear rate up to 52% lower than that of TiN:Ag. These findings highlight the advantageous properties of the TiCN coating for dental implant applications. Its combination of high wear resistance, favourable frictional stability, and hydrophilic surface behaviour suggests strong potential for improved long-term functionality and clinical reliability under conditions simulating the oral environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P. and M.M.; investigation, K.P. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, K.P. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, K.P. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kochar, S.P.; Reche, A.; Paul, P. The Etiology and Management of Dental Implant Failure: A Review. Cureus 2022, 14, e30455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kourtis, S.G.; Sotiriadou, S.; Voliotis, S.; Challas, A. Private Practice Results of Dental Implants. Part I: Survival and Evaluation of Risk Factors—Part II: Surgical and Prosthetic Complications. Implant Dent. 2004, 13, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dini, C.; Costa, R.C.; Sukotjo, C.; Takoudis, C.G.; Mathew, M.T.; Barão, V.A.R. Progression of Bio-Tribocorrosion in Implant Dentistry. Front. Mech. Eng. Sec. Tribol. 2020, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alves, C.F.A.; Oliveira, F.; Carvalho, I.; Piedade, A.P.; Carvalho, S. Influence of albumin on the tribological behavior of Ag-Ti (C, N) thin films for orthopedic implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2014, 34, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Viteri, V.S.; Barandika, M.G.; Gopegui, U.R.; Bayón, R.; Zubizarreta, C.; Fernández, X.; Igartua, A.; Agullo-Rueda, F. Characterization of Ti-C-N coatings deposited on Ti6Al4V for biomedical applications. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2012, 117, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Madej, M.; Piotrowska, K. Characterisation of TiCN Coatings for Biomedical Applications. Coatings 2024, 14, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ching, H.A.; Choudhury, D.; Nine, M.J.; Osman, N.A.A. Effects of surface coating on reducing friction and wear of orthopaedic implants. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2014, 15, 014402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Onisi, M.; Kondo, W. Establishing an Environment for Growth of Aciduric Bacteria in the Oral Cavity. J. Dent. Res. 1956, 35, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pezzotti, G.; Adachi, T.; Gasparutti, I.; Vincini, G.; Zhu, W.; Boffelli, M.; Rondinella, A.; Marin, E.; Ichioka, H.; Yamamoto, T.; et al. Vibrational Monitor of Early Demineralization in Tooth Enamel after in Vitro Exposure to Phosphoridic Liquid. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2017, 173, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. White, D.J. Dental Calculus: Recent Insights into Occurrence, Formation, Prevention, Removal and Oral Health Effects of Supragingival and Subgingival Deposits. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 1997, 105, 508–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takahashi, N. Microbial Ecosystem in the Oral Cavity: Metabolic Diversity in an Ecological Niche and Its Relationship with Oral Diseases. Int. Congr. Ser. 2005, 1284, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arivazhagan, A.; Mani, K.; Kamarajan, B.P.; Saai Aashique, A.G.S.; Vijayaragavan, S.; Riju, A.A.; Rajeshkumar, G. Mechanical and biocompatibility studies on additively manufactured Ti6Al4V porous structures infiltrated with hydroxyapatite for implant applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1010, 177966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Marin, E.; Lanzutti, A. Biomedical Applications of Titanium Alloys: A Comprehensive Review. Materials 2023, 17, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hatamleh, M.M.; Wu, X.; Alnazzawi, A.; Watson, J.; Watts, D. Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of cranioplasty titanium implants following different surface treatments. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 676–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Haydar, H.J.; Al-Deen, H.J.; Abidali, A.K.; Mahmoud, A.A. Improved performance of Ti6Al4V alloy in Biomedical applications-Review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1973, 012146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dikova, T.; Hashim, D.P.; Mintcheva, N. Morphology and Structure of TiO2 Nanotube/Carbon Nanostructure Coatings on Titanium Surfaces for Potential Biomedical Application. Materials 2024, 17, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Feng, M.; Ma, Y.; Tian, Y.; Cao, H. Microstructure and Wear Resistance of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy Laser-Clad Ni60/WC Composite Coating. Materials 2024, 17, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ozimina, D.; Piotrowska, K.; Madej, M.; Granek, A. The influence of ion implantation on the properties of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy in biotribological systems. Tribologia 2020, 292, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Basha, M.M.; Ch Murthy, T.S.R.; Paul, B.; Sahu, A.K.; Sankar, M.R. Experimental investigation on dry sliding wear characteristics of additive manufactured titanium alloy features with various carbide balls. Tribol. Int. 2026, 213, 111029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mukhtar, Z.; Kundan, N.; Dey, A. Corrosion and wear characterization of Ti6-Al-4 V alloy: Experimental analysis and performance evaluation. Tribol. Int. 2024, 197, 109745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elias, C.N.; Oshida, Y.; Cavalcanti Lima, J.H.; Muller, C.A. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 1, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ji, M.; Zhang, S.; Qiu, J.; Liu, G.; Guo, F.; Xu, J.; Chen, M. Enhanced tribological properties and cyto-biocompatibility of dental Ti6Al4V alloy via laser surface texturing. Technology 2024, 33, 4105–4115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. ISO 25178-2:2021; Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal, Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  24. Dzierwa, A.; Pawlus, P.; Zelasko, W. The Influence of Disc Surface Topography after Vapor Blasting on Wear of Sliding Pairs under Dry Sliding Conditions. Coatings 2020, 10, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, B.; Song, Q.; Wan, Y.; Chen, L. Surface Characterization and Tribological Performance of Anodizing Micro-Textured Aluminum-Silicon Alloys. Materials 2019, 12, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Liang, X. Effects of Surface Roughness Parameters on Tribological Performance for Micro-textured Eutectic Aluminum–Silicon Alloy. J. Tribol. 2020, 142, 021702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kung, C.H.; Sow, P.K.; Zahiri, B.; Mérida, W. Assessment and Interpretation of Surface Wettability Based on Sessile Droplet Contact Angle Measurement: Challenges and Opportunities. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marmur, A.; Volpe, C.D.; Siboni, S.; Amirfazli, A.; Drelich, J.W. Contact angles and wettability: Towards common and accurate terminology. Surf. Innov. 2017, 5, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wysokińska-Miszczuk, J.; Piotrowska, K.; Paulo, M.; Madej, M. Composite Materials Used for Dental Fillings. Materials 2024, 17, 4936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Li, G. Influence of surface roughness on contact angle hysteresis and spreading work. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2020, 298, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boyan, B.D.; Lotz, E.M.; Schwartz, Z. Roughness and Hydrophilicity as Osteogenic Biomimetic Surface Properties. Tissue Eng. Part A 2017, 23, 1479–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sartoretto, S.C.; Alves, A.T.N.N.; Resende, R.F.B.; Calasans-Maia, J.; Granjeiro, J.M.; Calasans-Maia, M.D. Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2015, 23, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bumgardner, J.D.; Wiser, R.; Elder, S.H.; Jouett, R.; Yang, Y.; Ong, J.L. Contact angle, protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell attachment to chitosan coatings bonded to titanium. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2003, 14, 1401–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kot, M.; Rakowski, W.; Major, Ł.; Lackner, J. Examination of the fracture toughness and wear resistance of multilayer coatings. Tribologia 2014, 2, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  35. Piotrowska, K. Influence of Selected Surface Layers on the Performance Properties of the Titanium Alloy Ti13Nb13Zr in Biotribological Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Kielce University of Technology, Kielce, Poland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Friction pair: photography (a), diagram (b).
Figure 1. Friction pair: photography (a), diagram (b).
Materials 18 05010 g001
Figure 2. Surface texture: SED images (a) and primary profiles on cross-section (b) of TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings.
Figure 2. Surface texture: SED images (a) and primary profiles on cross-section (b) of TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings.
Materials 18 05010 g002
Figure 3. Three-dimensional axonometric images (a) and material contribution curves (b).
Figure 3. Three-dimensional axonometric images (a) and material contribution curves (b).
Materials 18 05010 g003
Figure 4. Average contact angle with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8.
Figure 4. Average contact angle with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8.
Materials 18 05010 g004
Figure 5. Representative contact angle images (artificial saliva, pH 5.8) and corresponding SEM micrographs of TiCN (a) and TiN:Ag (b) coatings.
Figure 5. Representative contact angle images (artificial saliva, pH 5.8) and corresponding SEM micrographs of TiCN (a) and TiN:Ag (b) coatings.
Materials 18 05010 g005
Figure 6. Examples waveforms of friction coefficients for TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings lubricated with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8.
Figure 6. Examples waveforms of friction coefficients for TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings lubricated with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8.
Materials 18 05010 g006
Figure 7. Average values of friction coefficients for TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings lubricated with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8.
Figure 7. Average values of friction coefficients for TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings lubricated with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8.
Materials 18 05010 g007
Figure 8. Views of wear track (a) and primary profiles on the cross-section (b) of TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings.
Figure 8. Views of wear track (a) and primary profiles on the cross-section (b) of TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings.
Materials 18 05010 g008
Figure 9. Average volumetric wear index values of TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings under lubrication with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8.
Figure 9. Average volumetric wear index values of TiCN and TiN:Ag coatings under lubrication with artificial saliva at pH 5.8 and 6.8.
Materials 18 05010 g009
Table 1. Characteristics of the materials used for testing.
Table 1. Characteristics of the materials used for testing.
CoatingsManufacturerDeposition TechniqueView
TiCNOerlikon Balzers, Montcada i Reixac,
Spain
s3pMaterials 18 05010 i001
TiN:AgOerlikon Balzers,
Brügg bei Biel,
Switzerland
arcMaterials 18 05010 i002
Table 2. Characteristics of the testing methods.
Table 2. Characteristics of the testing methods.
Methodology and Section NumberMeasurement
Instruments
Research
Methodology
3.1. Microstructure and surface texture before tribological testPhenom XL
(Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Eindhoven, The Netherlands)
DCM8 non-contact profilometer (Leica, Heerbrugg,
Switzerland)
sample shape: disc, Ø 18 mm,
method: SED
magnification: ×5000
sample shape: disc, Ø 18 mm,
method and lens: confocal, ×20
measurement area: 0.65 mm × 0.85 mm
3.2. WettabilityAttension Theta Flex
(Biolin Scientific,
Tietäjäntie, Finland)
method: sessile drop method,
liquid: artificial saliva 5.8 and 6.8
drop volume: 5 µL
3.3. Tribological Properties and
Assessment of Surface Geometric Structure After Tribological Tests
TRB3 tribometer
(Anton Paar, Baden,
Switzerland)
sample shape: disc, Ø 18 mm,
motion: reciprocating,
load and cycle: 1 N, 25,000
amplitude and frequency: 10 mm, 1 Hz
countersample: Al2O3 ball, diameter 6 mm
lubrication: artificial saliva 5.8 and 6.8
DCM8 non-contact profilometer (Leica, Heerbrugg,
Switzerland)
sample shape: disc, Ø 18 mm,
method and lens: confocal, ×20
measurement area: 0.7 mm × 0.7 mm
Table 3. Amplitude parameters.
Table 3. Amplitude parameters.
SaSqSvSpSskSku
µm-
TiCN0.10.22.12.62.425.7
TiN:Ag0.20.32.98.63.756.9
Table 4. Parameters from the areal material ratio curve.
Table 4. Parameters from the areal material ratio curve.
SkSpkSvk
µm
TiCN0.380.340.18
TiN:Ag0.390.450.21
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Piotrowska, K.; Madej, M. Surface Texture, Wettability and Tribological Behavior of Titanium Nitride-Based Coatings Deposited on Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy. Materials 2025, 18, 5010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18215010

AMA Style

Piotrowska K, Madej M. Surface Texture, Wettability and Tribological Behavior of Titanium Nitride-Based Coatings Deposited on Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy. Materials. 2025; 18(21):5010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18215010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Piotrowska, Katarzyna, and Monika Madej. 2025. "Surface Texture, Wettability and Tribological Behavior of Titanium Nitride-Based Coatings Deposited on Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy" Materials 18, no. 21: 5010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18215010

APA Style

Piotrowska, K., & Madej, M. (2025). Surface Texture, Wettability and Tribological Behavior of Titanium Nitride-Based Coatings Deposited on Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy. Materials, 18(21), 5010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18215010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop