Next Article in Journal
Development of a Bio-Inspired Aerogel with Robust Sustainability and Thermal Insulation Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ultra-Narrow Gap-Welded and Submerged Arc-Welded Q355E HSLA Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Hybrid Fiber Compositions on Mechanical Properties and Durability of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of a Recycled Phosphogypsum Modifier on the Performance of High-Content Phosphogypsum Cementing Materials

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Hubei Changyao New Materials Co., Ltd., Yichang 443000, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(12), 2807; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122807
Submission received: 12 May 2025 / Revised: 9 June 2025 / Accepted: 12 June 2025 / Published: 14 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Characterization and Optimization of Cement-Based Materials)

Abstract

Phosphogypsum, a byproduct of phosphate fertilizer production, represents a significant environmental concern due to its large-scale production and low utilization rates. Although preparing phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials offers a potential solution to these issues, high-content phosphogypsum cementitious systems encounter significant technical barriers, including long setting durations and insufficient early-age strength development, thereby restricting their practical implementation. Hence, this research developed innovative modifiers through an environmentally friendly low-temperature thermal activation process (100–160 °C) utilizing recycled phosphogypsum aggregates and circumventing the substantial carbon emissions associated with conventional modification approaches. Systematic characterization demonstrated that the dehydration phase modifier synthesized at 120 °C (DH120) exhibited optimal phase composition, resulting in a 35.7% enhancement in its 14-d compressive strength (9.8 MPa vs. 7.2 MPa for the control) and an 11.3% reduction in its initial setting time (27.5 vs. 31.0 h for the control). Microstructural characterization by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray diffractometry revealed that DH120 effectively enhanced refinement of the pore structure (37.7% mesopore volume reduction) and promoted the ettringite crystallization kinetics. This work establishes a sustainable framework for utilizing industrial byproducts in cementitious material systems.

1. Introduction

The continual development of phosphogypsum hydraulic cementitious materials, such as gypsum slag cement and supersulfated slag cement, has led to progressive increases in the content of phosphogypsum over the years [1,2,3,4,5]. To further enhance phosphogypsum utilization and mitigate the environmental and land resource pressures caused by its stockpiling, high-content phosphogypsum cementitious (HCPC) materials, which typically contain phosphogypsum contents exceeding 80%, have been developed [6,7]. However, owing to the limited content of active cementitious materials in this system (e.g., slag powder), chemical reactions primarily occur on the surfaces of the phosphogypsum particles, resulting in the insufficient formation of hydration products, leading to challenges such as low early strengths, high porosities, low softening coefficients, and prolonged setting times. More specifically, this slag exhibits low reactivity, resulting in the insufficient formation of early hydration products; consequently, it is necessary to incorporate modifiers to promote the reaction.
Previous studies have demonstrated that seed modifiers, such as ettringite seeds and C-S-H seeds, can reduce the Gibbs free energy of crystal nucleation, thereby promoting the early formation of ettringite and C-S-H gels and enhancing the overall hydration process [8,9,10,11]. For instance, Li et al. [12] demonstrated that incorporating 7% ettringite seeds in supersulfated phosphogypsum slag cement systems accelerates hydration; induces the rapid formation of ettringite in early-stage pores; and improves the matrix strength, setting time, and pore structure. Similarly, Zhang et al. [13] found that recycled concrete fines enhance hydration product growth by providing nucleation sites, thereby increasing the hydration degree and ultimately strengthening the cementitious matrix.
The thermal activation of hydration products at different temperatures yields dehydration phases with advantageous properties, such as shortened setting times and rapid rehydration rates. For example, Zhai et al. [14] observed that the incorporation of dehydrated cement paste can effectively reduce the setting time and enhance the strength of ordinary Portland cement. In addition, Sun et al. [15] demonstrated that introducing dehydrated C-S-H gel phases, aluminum phases, and calcium hydroxide into supersulfated phosphogypsum systems shortens the setting time and promotes early strength development. However, these methods typically require high-temperature treatment, which increases production costs and carbon emissions, thereby conflicting with low-carbon environmental principles. In high-content phosphogypsum cementitious materials, the main hydration products decompose at specific temperatures, namely, 90–100 °C for ettringite, 200–800 °C for C-S-H gel, and 100–200 °C for unreacted phosphogypsum [16,17,18,19].
To overcome these limitations, this study focuses on the development of an optimized low-temperature thermal activation process (≤160 °C) for producing modifiers from recycled phosphogypsum aggregates and systematically investigates the synergistic mechanisms between the seed and dehydration phase modifiers in terms of regulating the hydration kinetics and microstructural development. Through a combination of mechanical and thermal activation techniques, phosphogypsum slag aggregate waste is transformed into seed modifiers and dehydration phase modifiers, respectively. Subsequently, the influences of these modifiers on the setting behaviors, hardening characteristics, and mechanical performances of high-content phosphogypsum cementitious systems are comprehensively evaluated to establish a scientific basis for their practical implementation in such material systems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The phosphogypsum used in this study was obtained from the Dongxiquan phosphogypsum slag yard of Zhongfu Chemicals (Yichang, Hubei Province, China). The P.O 42.5 Ordinary Portland Cement was sourced from Huaxin Cement Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, Hubei Province, China), and the ground granulated blast furnace slag powder (GGBFS) was provided by Lingshou County Dali Mineral Products Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, China. The recycled fine aggregate powder was prepared from phosphogypsum slag aggregate waste (phosphogypsum/slag powder/cement = 88:6:6 wt%) produced by a local enterprise (Hubei Linlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd., Yichang, Hubei Province, China). The waste was processed by drying at 50 °C until reaching a constant weight, and then by grinding and sieving (200-mesh square hole sieve) to obtain construction waste recycled cementitious material powder (RCMP) with a particle size of less than 74 µm.
The chemical compositions of all materials were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF, PANalytical Zetium XRF). The chemical and mineral compositions of the RCMP were further characterized using X-ray diffractometry (XRD, D8 Advance) and thermal analysis (STA200 thermal analyzer, Hitachi, Japan). Detailed characterization results, including the key trends and findings, are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1.

2.2. Specimen Preparation

2.2.1. Preparation of the Modifiers

The waste phosphogypsum-based aggregate was crushed and ground by the horizontal ball mill (GMS5-1, Changsha Miqi Instrument & Equipment Co., Ltd., Changsha, Hunan Province, China) with a ball/material ratio of 3:1 at 200 rpm for 1.5 h and then sieved through a 200-mesh sieve to obtain the waste RCMP, which served as a crystal seed (CS) modifier. The RCMP was thermally treated using an electric blast drying oven (101-00B Electrothermal constant temperature blast drying oven). The sample was heated at a rate of 5 °C/min. After reaching the predetermined temperature, the material was maintained at this temperature for 4 h, followed by natural cooling to 20–26 °C within the drying chamber. The final product was then sealed for storage, yielding the dehydration phase (DH) modifier, as detailed in Table 2.

2.2.2. Characterization of the Modifiers

The particle size distributions of the CS and DH modifiers were analyzed using a Mastersizer 2000 laser diffraction analyzer (Malvern PANalytical, Malvern, UK), with isopropanol serving as the dispersion medium to ensure optimal particle separation. For phase composition analysis, XRD was performed on a Rigaku SmartLab SE diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source. XRD was conducted under operational conditions of 40 kV and 40 mA, employing a continuous scanning mode from 2θ values of 5–70°. The scanning parameters were carefully optimized, giving a scan rate of 5°/min and a step size of 0.02°.

2.2.3. Sample Preparation

The formulation parameters for the phosphogypsum-modified slag cementitious systems with equivalent substitution levels are presented in Table 3, wherein a constant water/binder (w/b) ratio of 4:10 was employed. The specimen fabrication protocol adhered to Chinese National Standard GB/T 17671-1999 [20]. For each mixing proportion outlined in the table, three cubic test specimens (40 × 40 × 40 mm3) were cast and cured under standardized conditions (20 ± 1 °C, 95% RH) until testing. The mechanical properties of the samples were subsequently evaluated after 7, 14, and 28 d of storage, and the compressive strengths are reported as the mean ± the standard deviation (SD).
Following the strength evaluations, the test specimens were broken and soaked in anhydrous ethanol for 24 h to prevent hydration reactions. Subsequently, the samples were dried at 40 °C for 24 h. A subset of the samples was allocated for additional analysis; one portion was examined using LF-NMR to evaluate its pore structure, while the other was retained for subsequent mineralogical and microstructural investigations.

2.3. Test Methods

2.3.1. Workability Testing

The macroscopic physical properties of the paste, including the setting time and fluidity, were evaluated to assess its workability and hardening behavior. The initial and final setting times were determined in compliance with the Chinese national standard GB/T 1346-2011 [21], employing a standardized Vicat apparatus for precise measurement.

2.3.2. Mechanical Performance Testing

The compressive strengths of the 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 cubic specimens were tested using a universal testing machine (DYE-300S Compression Tester, Wuxi Dejiayi Testing Instrument Co., Ltd., Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China) according to the national standard GB/T 17671-1999 [20] under a loading rate of 0.5 kN/s.
The softening coefficient (φ), defined as the ratio of compressive strength in the water-saturated state (fsat) to that in the dry state (fdry), was calculated as follows to evaluate the water resistance:
φ = f d r y f s a t .
Water-saturated specimens were prepared by immersion in deionized water for 48 h, while the dry specimens were obtained by vacuum drying at 40 ± 2 °C (vacuum ≤ 10 Pa) until reaching a constant weight (mass change <0.1%). The compressive strength was measured at a loading rate of 0.5 kN/s, and the softening coefficient was calculated from the mean values obtained from three parallel samples. A higher softening coefficient (i.e., closer to 1) indicates superior water resistance and modifier effectiveness.

2.3.3. Hydration Heat

The hydration heat was assessed using a TAM Air C80 isothermal calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA), which exhibits a sensitivity of ±0.1 mW/g, following calibration with indium reference standards. The sample paste, prepared according to the conditions outlined in Table 3 (w/b ratio of 4:10), was placed in a sealed test cell, and the hydration heat release rate and cumulative heat release were monitored for 10 d at 25 ± 0.1 °C.

2.3.4. Characterization of the Hydration Products

For phase analysis of the hydration products, specimens cured for 14 d were first crushed into granules and immediately immersed in anhydrous ethanol (purity ≥ 99.7%) for 24 h to terminate further hydration. After immersion, the samples were removed from ethanol, filtered, and vacuum-dried at 40 ± 2 °C for 24 h (vacuum ≤ 10 Pa). Subsequently, the dried granular samples were ground into fine powders and sieved through a 200-mesh sieve (aperture 75 µm) to obtain a homogeneous powder for further testing. More specifically, the crystal phase compositions of the hydration products were analyzed by XRD using a Rigaku SmartLab SE diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Cu-Kα radiation source. Data acquisition was conducted over a 2θ range of 5–70° using a continuous scanning method, with a step size of 0.02° and a scan rate of 5°/min. Additionally, the thermal behavior of the cement hydration products was investigated using TG-DSC (HITACHI STA200, Tokyo, Japan). These experiments were conducted in a nitrogen environment, wherein the temperature was increased linearly from 30 to 400 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.

2.3.5. Microstructure Testing

The pore architectures of the 28-d-cured phosphogypsum-based cementitious composites were examined using LF-NMR (MesoMR12-060H-1 analyzer, Suzhou Niumag Analytical Instrument Co., Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China). The experimental configuration was established with the following optimized parameters: magnetic field strength = 0.5 ± 0.01 T, resonance frequency = 21 MHz, pulse sequence = CPMG (τ = 200 μs, NECH = 8000), temperature = 32.0 ± 0.5 °C, cumulative number of scans (NS) = 64, and relaxation waiting time (TW) = 2000. All samples were vacuum-saturated for 48 h before testing, with three-dimensional gradient coil compensation applied to minimize the magnetic field distortion (<50 ppm variation). The transverse relaxation time (T2) distributions were deconvoluted using the non-negative least squares (NNLS) algorithm, converting the T2 times to pore sizes via the following equation:
r = CT2
where C = 3.05 μm/s (calibrated according to mesoporous silica standards).
Microstructural characterization was performed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, TESCAN MIRA LMS, Czech Republic). For this purpose, small specimen fragments were carefully mounted on conductive adhesive and sputter-coated with a thin gold layer (45 s at 10 mA) using a Quorum SC7620 sputter coater to ensure an appropriate surface conductivity. Finally, high-resolution SEM images were acquired at an optimized accelerating voltage of 3 kV.

3. Characterization of Modifiers

3.1. Phase Composition

Figure 2 presents the phase composition of the crystal phase compositions of the CS and DH samples. The CS sample consists of gypsum, ettringite, and quartz phases. The DH100 sample contains gypsum, hemipelagic gypsum, and quartz phases. The DH120 sample consists of hemipelagic gypsum and quartz phases. Both the DH140 and DH160 samples contain hemipelagic gypsum, anhydrite gypsum, and quartz phases. At 100 °C, the ettringite component present in the DH100 sample decomposes to generate meta-ettringite [16], which is accompanied by the formation of hemihydrate gypsum, indicating partial dehydration of the dihydrate gypsum. At 120–140 °C, the dihydrate gypsum present in DH120 converts into hemihydrate gypsum, while in the DH140 sample, the hemihydrate gypsum component begins to transform into anhydrite. At 160 °C, the hemihydrate gypsum present in DH160 further dehydrates into the anhydrite form. These phase transformations are critical for enhancing the setting, hardening, and early strength development characteristics of the modified recycled cementitious material.

3.2. Particle Size Distribution

As illustrated in Figure 3 and Table 4, the thermal treatment temperature affected the particle size characteristics of the modifiers. The DH series samples (DH100-DH160) consistently showed finer particle sizes than the CS sample, with D50 reductions of 12.0–15.5% (15.296 μm → 12.924–13.675 μm) and narrower size distributions (Span decreasing from 3.40 to 3.65–3.81). More specifically, heat treatment was found to effectively refine the fine particles of the waste aggregate powder, primarily through the phase transformation of dihydrate gypsum to hemihydrate gypsum, which has a looser structure and a higher specific surface area, thereby enhancing the ability of this material to adsorb free water [22]. Therefore, precise control of the heat treatment temperature is essential for optimizing the particle size and material performance.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Workability

Figure 4 illustrates the setting time and fluidity characteristics of each experimental group: the control group (H group) exhibited initial and final setting times of 31.03 and 47.33 h, respectively. In addition, the seed modifier group showed reduced setting times of 29.53 h (initial) and 46.13 h (final), while the dehydration phase modifier group achieved the shortest setting times of 27.53 h (initial) and 41.47 h (final). These results clearly indicate that both the seed and dehydration phase modifiers effectively shortened the setting times of the phosphogypsum slag cement. Additionally, incorporating the dehydration phase modifier increased the paste viscosity by adsorbing water, thereby reducing the free water content and significantly lowering the fluidity.

4.2. Mechanical Performance

Figure 5 presents the compressive strength and softening coefficient characteristics of the various samples at different curing ages. Relative to the control group (H), the CS-H group demonstrated 12.24 and 11.02% increases in its 14 and 28 d compressive strengths, respectively, although the DH120-H group exhibited the most significant improvements, with increases of 35.71 and 14.17%, respectively. However, increasing the heat treatment temperature of the dehydration phase had only a limited effect. For instance, the DH160-H group demonstrated only 13.27 and 4% increases in compressive strength compared to the control group for the 14 and 28 d measurements. In addition, both the seed and dehydration phase modifiers enhanced the early compressive strength. However, the water-absorbing properties of the dehydration phase modifier reduced the amount of free water, thereby providing more pronounced strength enhancement than the seed modifier. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of the dehydration phase modifier decreased with higher heat treatment temperatures, thereby highlighting the importance of temperature control.
The softening coefficients of both the DH120-H group (0.75) and CS-H group (0.72) were higher than those of the control group (0.64), with the DH120-H group demonstrating the best performance. This improvement is attributed to the modified pore structure of the specimens after the incorporation of modifiers, as illustrated in Figure 6 and Figure 7.

4.3. Hydration Process

As illustrated in Figure 8, the heat release curve of the high-content phosphogypsum slag cement paste exhibits two exothermic peaks, wherein the first peak corresponds to the dissolution of phosphogypsum and cement, releasing heat and increasing the Ca2+, SO42−, and OH ion concentrations [23,24,25,26]. Upon hydration of the cement, the alkalinity increases, and the slag surface structure is disrupted, releasing Ca2+, Al3+, AlO33−, and SO42−, which react with OH to form the C-S-H gel and ettringite [27]; this represents the induction period. The second peak arises from continued slag dissolution and hydration product formation [28,29]. In this system, the low slag content results in a lower heat release rate. Consequently, the dehydration phase modifier group demonstrated a 12.12% increase in the rate of heat release corresponding to the second peak, with the peak occurring earlier; the seed modifier group showed a smaller enhancement of 4.40%. Therefore, the higher cumulative heat release exhibited by the dehydration phase modifier group confirms its role in promoting hydration.

4.4. Phase Analysis of the Hydration Products

The XRD and TG-DSC spectra of the 14 d specimens are illustrated in Figure 9 and Figure 10, wherein the main crystalline phases can be identified as dihydrate gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O, PDF#21-0816), ettringite (AFt, PDF#41-1451), and quartz (SiO2, PDF#78-2315). Ettringite, a principal hydration product, is characterized by its distinctive diffraction peak at 9.1° [30], and the intensity of this signal represents the degree of hydration. After normalization, the CS-H and DH120-H groups showed higher ettringite diffraction peak intensities and areas than the control group.
The thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative (DTG) curve presented in Figure 8 reveals two distinct endothermic events. The first thermal event (55–120 °C) is attributed to the decomposition of the C-S-H gel and ettringite components, while the second event (120–180 °C) corresponds to the thermal decomposition of the dihydrate and hemihydrate gypsum phases [31]. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that the mass loss associated with the first endothermic peak increased significantly upon modifier incorporation, with the seed modifier group exhibiting the most substantial enhancement (24.67%), followed by the dehydration phase modifier group (19.97%). These thermal analyses provide further evidence that both modifiers effectively accelerated the formation of hydration products, consistent with the phase composition analysis results obtained from the XRD measurements.

4.5. Microstructure Study

4.5.1. LF-NMR

The pore architecture evolution in the 28 d-cured specimens was quantitatively assessed through LF-NMR the resulting transverse relaxation time (T2) distributions, and the corresponding integral areas are presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7. Three distinct pore regimes were identified based on the T2 values, namely, gel pores (0.01–1 ms, corresponding to interlayer water in C-S-H), capillary pores (1–100 ms, associated with hydration product interstices), and meso-macropores (100–1000 ms, representing structural defects and crack networks) [32]. Additionally, the bimodal T2 distributions revealed fundamental differences in the pore hierarchy between groups, wherein the control specimen (H group) exhibited predominant meso-macropore signals (integral area = 27,387.30) but limited gel pore development (integral area = 571.96). Upon the incorporation of the crystalline seed modifier, significant alterations in the pore structure of the cementitious system were observed. More specifically, the gel pore area increased to 591.03; the capillary pore area expanded to 24,365.95; and the meso-macropore area decreased to 23,102.50. Notably, the dehydrated phase modifier demonstrated enhanced regulatory effects, reaching the maximum values for both the gel water area (713.99) and the capillary pore area (26,989.07). This was accompanied by a substantial reduction in the meso-macropore area (17,060.26), the lowest observed among all experimental groups.
These results clearly indicate that modifier incorporation induced substantial pore structure refinement, particularly in the DH120-H specimen, which demonstrated optimal performance. Quantitative analysis showed 24.83 and 14.73% increases in the gel and capillary pore volumes, respectively, concurrent with a 37.71% reduction in the meso-macropore content. This threefold improvement mechanism, based on enhanced gel pore formation through accelerated C-S-H and ettringite nucleation, capillary pore densification via dehydration phase water absorption, and macropore elimination by seed-induced hydration product infilling, directly correlates with the observed enhancement in the compressive strength.

4.5.2. SEM

FE-SEM observations were conducted on the fracture surfaces of the 28 d specimens to reveal the influences of the CS and DH modifiers on the microstructures of the high-content phosphogypsum cementitious materials. As indicated in Figure 11, unreacted phosphogypsum particles formed a three-dimensional skeletal structure, with the hydration products (i.e., ettringite and the C-S-H gel) acting as binding phases to fill the skeletal voids. In the DH group, needle-like ettringite crystals were interwoven to fill the pores while the C-S-H gel adhered to the ettringite surfaces, forming a dense matrix. In contrast, the CS group exhibited more exposed ettringite crystals without complete encapsulation by the C-S-H gel, resulting in a less dense pore structure compared to the DH group. This microstructural difference may account for the higher 28 d strength observed for the DH group compared to the CS group.
Based on the results and discussion presented above, the study identified 120 °C as the optimal calcination temperature, as the modifier prepared at this temperature significantly enhanced the hydration process of phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials, improved pore structure, and increased mechanical strength. Notably, the energy consumption and carbon emissions associated with the 4 h thermal activation process have yet to be quantified using a life cycle assessment. A comparative analysis of the carbon reduction benefits compared to those of conventional high-energy modifiers (e.g., silica fume) would be desirable; however, this approach would require further calculation of the net environmental benefit to validate any sustainability claims. More specifically, the net environmental gains from waste reuse must be rigorously weighed against the embodied energy of sustained heating (e.g., the electricity input required to maintain a temperature of 120 °C over 4 h on an industrial scale).

5. Conclusions

In this study, recycled cementitious modifiers, prepared via the mechanical activation and thermal treatment of phosphogypsum slag aggregate waste, were utilized to significantly improve the performance of high-content phosphogypsum cementitious systems. Notably, treating waste phosphogypsum-based aggregates generates both seed and dehydration phase modifiers, promoting the sustainable reuse of industrial byproducts. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
The particle size of the DH modifier is smaller than that of the CS modifier. The phase composition of the DH modifier (primarily dehydrated gypsum and ettringite) is significantly influenced by the heat treatment temperature, with the hemihydrate gypsum content increasing as the temperature rises. Experimental optimization results indicate that 120 °C is the most effective heat treatment temperature, under which the generated components exhibit a well-balanced composition and demonstrate optimal mechanical performance.
(2)
Both modifiers led to notable improvements in the compressive strength across all curing periods, with the most significant gains observed at 14 d. More specifically, the crystal seed-modified samples exhibited a 12.24% increase in strength, while the sample modified with the dehydration phase synthesized in the 120 °C group (DH120-H) achieved a more substantial 35.71% improvement, highlighting the superior performance of the dehydration phase modifier.
(3)
The dehydration phase modifier demonstrated significant catalytic effects in terms of the hydration kinetics, with isothermal calorimetry revealing a 12.12% increase in the hydration heat release rate and a 4.9% elevation in the cumulative heat evolution. This acceleration reduced the initial setting time by 11.3% (i.e., from 31.0 to 27.5 h) and promoted the formation of hydration products, further enhancing the material performance.
(4)
Both modifiers effectively refined the pore structure by increasing the proportion of gel pores (by 24.83%) and capillary pores (by 14.73%) while decreasing the mesopore and macropore areas (by 37.71%). This optimization resulted in a denser microstructure and improved the overall properties of the phosphogypsum cementitious material.
These results highlight the potential of utilizing phosphogypsum slag aggregate waste to produce high-performance modifiers, ultimately aiming to promote sustainable construction practices and waste management. Future research should focus on evaluating the long-term durability of these modifier–phosphogypsum cementitious materials, assessing the economic viability of large-scale production, and exploring the synergistic effects of combining these modifiers with other waste-derived materials to provide further performance and sustainability enhancements.

Author Contributions

Investigation, J.L.; methodology, J.L. and Z.S.; data curation, J.L.; formal analysis, J.L.; writing—original draft, J.L.; funding acquisition, C.W. and Z.S.; supervision C.W. and W.L., writing—review and editing, C.W. and Z.S.; resources, Z.S. and W.L., and conceptualization, Z.S. and W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Hubei Changyao New Materials Co., Ltd., Yichang, Hubei Province, China, grant numbers 202301hx0503 and 20221h0534.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate financial support received from Hubei Changyao New Materials Co., Ltd., China (grant nos. 202301hx0503 and 20221h0534). I would like to thank Zheng Wu, Liu Zhijie, and Yu Zhengkang for providing language help, writing assistance, and proofreading of the article, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Chiqiu Wu and Wei Lyu were employed by the company Hubei Changyao New Materials Co., Ltd. All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guan, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Yu, W.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Chi, R.; Zhou, J. The impurity removal and comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum: A review. Materials 2024, 17, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lv, Z.J.; Lin, Z.S.; Wang, H.J. Effect of phosphogypsum on the properties of over-sulfur phosphogypsum-ground granulate blast-furnace slag cement. Appl. Mechan. Mater. 2014, 638–640, 1453–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, M.; Shen, W.; Xiong, X.; Zhao, L.; Yu, Z.; Sun, H.; Xu, G.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, G.; Zhang, W. Effects of the Phosphogypsum on the Hydration and Microstructure of Alkali Activated Slag Pastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 368, 130391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Doussang, L.; Samson, G.; Deby, F.; Huet, B.; Guillon, E.; Cyr, M. Durability Parameters of Three Low-Carbon Concretes (Low Clinker, Alkali-Activated Slag and Supersulfated Cement). Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 407, 133511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.; Li, C.; Lv, T.; Zhao, Q.; Dong, B. Microstructure Regulation and Performance Enhancement of Waste Gypsum-Based Supersulfated Cement with Sintered Sludge Ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 477, 141358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, Q.; Cheng, F.; Guo, W. Solid Waste Binder Cemented Dihydrate Phosphogypsum Aggregate to Prepare Backfill Material. Miner. Eng. 2025, 226, 109249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, H.; Han, C.; Tang, Y. Research progress on reutilization of phosphogypsum in China. Mod. Chem. Ind. 2023, 43, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu, J.C.; Qian, J.S.; Tang, J.Y.; Ji, Z.; Fan, Y. Effect of ettringite seed crystals on the properties of calcium sulphoaluminate cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 207, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, X.R.; Bizzozero, J.; Hesse, C. Impact of C-S-H seeding on hydration and strength of slag blended cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2022, 161, 106935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gu, X.; Tan, H.; He, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Su, Y.; Yang, J. Nano C-S-H Seeds Prepared from Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag-Carbide Slag and Its Application in Portland Cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 329, 127204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhan, P.; Wang, J.; Zhao, H.; Li, W.; Shah, S.P.; Xu, J. Impact of Synthetic C-S-H Seeds on Early Hydration and Pore Structure Evolution of Cement Pastes: A Study by 1H Low-Field NMR and Path Analysis. Cem. Concr. Res. 2024, 175, 107376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, M.G.; Deng, X.F.; Jian, S.W.; Huang, J.; He, X.; Yang, J.; Tan, H. Effects of ettringite seed on the hydration and properties of supersulphated phosphogypsum-slag cement. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 452, 106935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, X.Y.; Fan, M.X.; Zhou, Y.X.; Ji, D.; Li, J.; Yu, R. Development of a Sustainable Alkali Activated Ultra-High Performance Concrete (A-UHPC) Incorporating Recycled Concrete Fines. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 67, 105986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhai, W.; Sun, R.; Xie, Y.; Ding, H.; Su, Y.; He, Z. Thermal-Activated Recycled Cement Powder Synergized with Fly Ash as Supplementary Cementitious in Portland Cement: Strength, Microstructure and Environmental Benefits. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 474, 141018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, T.; Hu, T.; Shui, Z.H.; Wang, G.M.; Gai, K.Y.; Xie, Y.F.; Wang, Z.Y.; Ding, C. A Phosphogypsum Slag Cement Early Strength Promoter Based on Modified Composite Dewatering Phase: CN110104984A; Wuhan University of Technology: Wuhan, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaufmann, J.; Winnefeld, F.; Lothenbach, B. Stability of ettringite in CSA cement at elevated temperatures. Adv. Cem. Res. 2015, 28, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.X.; Qiao, X.C. Review on influences of external factors on crystal structure and morphology of ettringite. Bull. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 42, 31–47. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, W.H.; Xu, J.Z. Study of the dehydration phase of gypsum and its hydration. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 1983, 4, 414–421. [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang, J.; Huang, J.; Min, J.; Lv, R.; Kuang, H.; Hu, H.; Yang, R.; Tang, P.; Zhao, Q.; Jian, S. Hydration Mechanism of a Sodium-Doped Phosphogypsum-Based Hemihydrate Whisker (Omongwaite) in Supersulfated Cement System. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 427, 136236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. GB/T 17671–1999; Test Method for Strength of Cement Mortar (ISO Method). State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision: Beijing, China, 1999.
  21. GB/T 1346–2011; Test Methods for Water Requirement of Normal Consistency, Setting Time and Soundness of Cement. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2011.
  22. Li, X.; Zhang, Q. Dehydration Behaviour and Impurity Change of Phosphogypsum during Calcination. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 311, 125328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bazaldúa-Medellín, M.E.; Fuentes, A.F.; Gorokhovsky, A.; Escalante-García, J.I. Early and late hydration of supersulphated cements of blast furnace slag with fluorgypsum. Mater. De Constr. 2015, 65, e053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yuan, J.F.; Liu, B.; Dong, X.J. Early hydration properties of phosphogypsum-based cement. Concrete 2014, 8, 92–94+97. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liao, Y.S.; Wang, K.; Li, H. Hydration process and long-term strength of gypsum slag cement with high content of phosphogypsum. Bull. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 42, 4408–4415. [Google Scholar]
  26. Xia, Y.; Tang, L.; He, Z.; Tang, J.; Yu, J.; Cao, D.; Wei, D. Study on Mechanical Properties, Hydration Mechanism and Carbon Emission of Phosphogypsum-Based Sustainable Cementitious Materials. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2025, 45, 102016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, J.; Zeng, J.Y.; He, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Su, Y.; Tan, H. Sustainable clinker-free solid waste binder produced from wet-ground granulated blast-furnace slag, phosphogypsum and carbide slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 330, 127218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.Y.; Sun, T.; Ouyang, G.S.; Li, Z.; Chen, M.; Li, H.; Wang, K.; Guo, Y. Simultaneous enhanced phosphorus removal and hydration reaction: Utilisation of polyaluminium chloride and polyaluminium ferric chloride to modify phosphogypsum-based excess-sulphate slag cement. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 476, 143712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, S.; Ouyang, J.; Ren, J. Mechanism of Calcination Modification of Phosphogypsum and Its Effect on the Hydration Properties of Phosphogypsum-Based Supersulfated Cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 243, 118226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gui, Y.; Pu, L.; Lu, S.; Xie, M.; Pei, L.; Tian, Y. Physical, Mechanical, Compaction, and Leaching Properties of Phosphogypsum-Based Semi-Rigid Aggregated Geomaterial. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 513, 145664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Yu, Y.; Zou, F.; Luo, H.; Zhou, Z.; Zhu, J.; Guo, G.; Zhong, Y. High performance C-A-S-H seeds from fly ash-carbide slag for activating lithium slag towards a low carbon binder. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 345, 118658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ouyang, G.S.; Sun, T.; Yu, Z.C.; Xu, F.; Bai, J.; Xu, D. Investigation on macroscopic properties, leachability and microstructures of surface reinforced phosphogypsum-based cold-bonded aggregates. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 69, 106305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis of the waste RCMP. (a) Thermogram, and (b) X-ray diffractogram.
Figure 1. Analysis of the waste RCMP. (a) Thermogram, and (b) X-ray diffractogram.
Materials 18 02807 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the CS and DH series modifiers.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the CS and DH series modifiers.
Materials 18 02807 g002
Figure 3. Particle size distributions of the modifier. (a) Particle size distribution curves, and (b) cumulative particle size distributions.
Figure 3. Particle size distributions of the modifier. (a) Particle size distribution curves, and (b) cumulative particle size distributions.
Materials 18 02807 g003
Figure 4. Setting times and fluidities of the high-phosphogypsum slag cement.
Figure 4. Setting times and fluidities of the high-phosphogypsum slag cement.
Materials 18 02807 g004
Figure 5. Compressive strengths and softening coefficients of the high-phosphogypsum slag cement.
Figure 5. Compressive strengths and softening coefficients of the high-phosphogypsum slag cement.
Materials 18 02807 g005
Figure 6. Heats of hydration for the high-phosphogypsum slag cement: (a) heat flow, and (b) cumulative heat release.
Figure 6. Heats of hydration for the high-phosphogypsum slag cement: (a) heat flow, and (b) cumulative heat release.
Materials 18 02807 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns recorded for the 14 d hydration products.
Figure 7. XRD patterns recorded for the 14 d hydration products.
Materials 18 02807 g007
Figure 8. Thermograms of the 14 d hydration products.
Figure 8. Thermograms of the 14 d hydration products.
Materials 18 02807 g008
Figure 9. T2 spectra of the phosphogypsum cementitious material: (a) T2 spectrum between 0.05 and 30 ms, and (b) T2 spectrum between 30 and 600 ms.
Figure 9. T2 spectra of the phosphogypsum cementitious material: (a) T2 spectrum between 0.05 and 30 ms, and (b) T2 spectrum between 30 and 600 ms.
Materials 18 02807 g009
Figure 10. Integral areas of the T2 spectra recorded for the phosphogypsum cementitious materials.
Figure 10. Integral areas of the T2 spectra recorded for the phosphogypsum cementitious materials.
Materials 18 02807 g010
Figure 11. SEM images of the 28 d samples: (a) CS-H and (b) DH120-H samples.
Figure 11. SEM images of the 28 d samples: (a) CS-H and (b) DH120-H samples.
Materials 18 02807 g011
Table 1. Chemical compositions of the raw materials (wt%).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of the raw materials (wt%).
SampleAl2O3SiO2CaOP2O5SO3Na2OMgOK2OTiO2Fe2O3FLOI
Phosphogypsum0.7956.71428.7850.83738.7470.1740.8490.320.100.4670.96921.171
OPC5.12622.2461.1890.202.6120.201.9130.8830.2393.078——1.992
GGBFS16.13233.95234.910.0612.9130.966.8650.4580.9421.152——0.885
RCMP2.1429.49534.6951.00338.9540.2160.8880.610.260.9330.5879.774
Table 2. Heat treatment conditions for preparation of the DH modifiers.
Table 2. Heat treatment conditions for preparation of the DH modifiers.
GroupHeat Treatment Temperature/°C
DH100100
DH120120
DH140140
DH160160
Table 3. Optimization of the modifier/high phosphogypsum slag cement mixing ratio.
Table 3. Optimization of the modifier/high phosphogypsum slag cement mixing ratio.
GroupModifier (wt%)Phosphogypsum Cementitious Material (wt%)
Crystal Seed ModifierDehydrated Phase ModifierPhosphogypsumSlagCement
H--80146
CS-H5-80146
DH100-H-580146
DH120-H-580146
DH140-H-580146
DH160-H-580146
Table 4. Particle size parameters of modifiers.
Table 4. Particle size parameters of modifiers.
SampleD0.1/μmD0.5/μmD0.9/μmD [4.3]/μmD [3.2]/μm
CS2.09615.29654.05422.5335.534
DH1001.9912.92452.22620.8835.164
DH1202.04713.45353.34721.395.265
DH1601.98913.67549.85220.4825.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lian, J.; Wu, C.; Shui, Z.; Lyu, W. Effect of a Recycled Phosphogypsum Modifier on the Performance of High-Content Phosphogypsum Cementing Materials. Materials 2025, 18, 2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122807

AMA Style

Lian J, Wu C, Shui Z, Lyu W. Effect of a Recycled Phosphogypsum Modifier on the Performance of High-Content Phosphogypsum Cementing Materials. Materials. 2025; 18(12):2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122807

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lian, Jiuyang, Chiqiu Wu, Zhonghe Shui, and Wei Lyu. 2025. "Effect of a Recycled Phosphogypsum Modifier on the Performance of High-Content Phosphogypsum Cementing Materials" Materials 18, no. 12: 2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122807

APA Style

Lian, J., Wu, C., Shui, Z., & Lyu, W. (2025). Effect of a Recycled Phosphogypsum Modifier on the Performance of High-Content Phosphogypsum Cementing Materials. Materials, 18(12), 2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122807

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop