Next Article in Journal
Simple Methods for Evaluating Acid Permeation and Biofilm Formation Behaviors on Polysiloxane Films
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Manufacturing Conditions on Binder-Less Boards from Steam-Exploded Hemp Shives and Wheat Straw
Previous Article in Journal
Effective Viscoplastic-Softening Model Suitable for Brain Impact Modelling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 6
10.3390/ma15062271
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Biochar Addition on Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability, and Water Resistance of Hemp-Polylactic Acid (PLA) Composites

by
Mariem Zouari
1,2,*,
David B. Devallance
1,2 and
Laetitia Marrot
1,3
1
Innorenew CoE, Livade 6, 6310 Izola, Slovenia
2
Faculty of Mathematics Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Muzejski Trg 2, 6000 Koper, Slovenia
3
Andrej Marušič Institute, University of Primorska, Muzejski Trg 2, 6000 Koper, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(6), 2271; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062271
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 13 March 2022 / Accepted: 16 March 2022 / Published: 19 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio-Based Materials from Wood and Non-wood Fibers: Development, Properties and Design)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present study investigated the effect of biochar (BC) addition on mechanical, thermal, and water resistance properties of PLA and hemp-PLA-based composites. BC was combined with variable concentration to PLA (5 wt%, 10 wt%, and 20 wt%) and hemp (30 wt%)-PLA (5 wt% and 10 wt%); then, composites were blended and injection molded. Samples were characterized by color measurements, tensile tests, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and water contact angle analysis. Experimental results showed that adding 5 wt% of BC enhanced the composite’s tensile modulus of elasticity and strength. Hence, the use of optimized loading of BC improved the mechanical strength of the composites. However, after BC addition, thermal stability slightly decreased compared with that of neat PLA due to the catalytic effect of BC particles. Moreover, the water-repelling ability decreased as BC content increased due to the specific hydrophilic characteristics of the BC used and its great porosity.

1. Introduction

The increase of environmental awareness, concerns related to ecological impact, waste storage and accumulation, and the depletion of synthetic resources have raised a growing interest in eco-friendly materials derived from renewable resources. Indeed, to serve specific applications and respect the current environmental challenges, novel sustainable composites need to be invented.
Specifically, polymeric composites reinforced by plant fibers demonstrate interesting properties such as high strength, low weight, and reduced environmental impact [1]. Polylactic acid (PLA) is a biobased aliphatic polyester produced by fermentation of natural glucose-rich resources such as corn, cassava, and sugarcane. The PLA matrix has demonstrated distinctive compostability, rigidity, and processability [2,3]. The global demand for PLA continues to grow and is forecasted to increase 18.1% annually until 2028 [4]. PLA is used in various applications such as food packaging, 3D printing filaments, textiles, and biomedical tools [4]. PLA use is limited by its price, degree of crystallization, inherent brittleness [5], and its relatively low glass transition temperature that negatively affects thermal resistance. Reinforcing PLA with plant fibers can enhance the resulting mechanical [6] and thermal properties [7]. In particular, long hemp fibers were reported as a potentially effective reinforcement in PLA-based composites that showed improved features [8,9,10]. However, the current high price of PLA and other shortcomings, such as thermal, mechanical, and moisture resistance remain key challenges that have limited the use of plant fibers reinforced-PLA composites.
Additives (i.e., fillers) can be used to reduce the price of PLA. Biochar (BC) is an interesting candidate to reduce prices and improve the performance of PLA composites. BC is a carbon-rich material derived from biomass pyrolysis at high temperatures in an oxygen-free atmosphere [11]. BC is a renewable and abundant material prepared from many types of biomass, including waste and low-value feedstocks [12]. BC recently emerged as filler in polymeric composites, including thermoplastics and thermosets [13,14]. The attractiveness of BC lies in its superior characteristics (depending on pyrolysis conditions), such as hydrophobicity [15], electrical conductivity [16,17], high surface area, and porosity [18].
Aup-Ngoen et Noipitak [19] evaluated the influence of BC reinforcement (0.25 wt%) prepared from different agricultural biomasses (cassava rhizome, durian peel, pineapple peel, and corncob) on PLA-BC composites. Their results indicated that BC powder derived from cassava rhizome increased the composite’s elastic modulus and impacted energy by 20.7% and 76%, respectively, compared to neat PLA. Similarly, Nan et al. [20] investigated the mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) thin films reinforced with hardwood BC. They found that the tensile modulus increased by 129%, 271%, and 429% when adding 2 wt%, 6 wt%, and 10 wt% of BC, respectively, compared to pure PVA. DeVallance et al. [21] studied the effect of BC incorporation in wood-polypropylene (PP) composites. They concluded that samples reinforced with 5 wt% and 40 wt% BC exhibited higher tensile strength and water resistance compared to wood-PP composites. Das et al. [22] used waste wood BC in PP-30 wt% wood flour bio-composites. They reported the positive effect of BC addition on mechanical and thermal properties, with 24 wt% addition of BC exhibiting the best properties.
To date, most research focused on adding BC to the polymer material, not fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Few studies addressed the effect of plant fibers and BC reinforcement in polymer-based materials [23]. However, in this study, we investigated the effect of beech-derived BC addition on the properties of PLA composites reinforced with short hemp fibers. Composites were prepared by blending of PLA-hemp fibers (0 and 30 wt%)-BC (0, 5, 10, and 20 wt%) mixtures followed by injection molding of tension test samples. The influence of adding BC on the color, mechanical properties, thermal stability, and water repellency of the resulting composites was studied and thoroughly discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Biochar (BC) produced at 550 °C using beechwood (labeled as Q004) was provided by Profagus GmbH (Bodenfelde, Germany). Polylactic acid (PLA) pellets (Inzea F38) dedicated for injection molding applications were purchased from Nurel biopolymers. The PLA used in this study had a bio-based content of 70%, a melt flow index of 1.8 g/10 min (190 °C/2.16 Kg), and a density of 1.23 g/cm3. Hemp fibers (Cannabis Sativa, dioecious Hungarian variety Tisza) were supplied by Hempson, and their properties were characterized in our previous study [10]. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (purity = 99.0%) purchased from Sigma Aldrich was used for particles size analysis. Technical nitrogen for thermogravimetric analyzer and nitrogen and carbon dioxide gases with a purity of 5.0 were used for physisorption analysis.

2.2. Preparation and Characterization of the Fillers

The characterization of the BC powder included proximate analysis using a thermogravimetric analyzer (LECO TGA801) following ASTM-D7582 procedures (LECO corporation, Saint-Joseph, MI, USA) to determine the moisture, volatile, ash, and fixed carbon contents. Particle size was measured by laser diffraction using a Horiba Scientific LA-960A2 analyzer (HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan) with the refractive index set to 1.92. For homogeneous particle dispersion during the particle size testing, sample powder was first mixed with 2 mL of distilled water and 2 mL of 20% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate solution and ultrasonicated for 1 min before the measurement. Additionally, the surface area and pores volume were determined by physisorption analysis (Anton Paar Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) using nitrogen and carbon dioxide gases.
Hemp fibers were manually cut into short pieces with a custom-made guillotine, and their length was evaluated using a digital microscope Keyence VHX-6000 (Keyence corporation, Itasca, IL, USA).

2.3. Preparation and Characterization of the Composites

Seven composite formulations were prepared using PLA, BC, and hemp fibers. The formulation’s weight ratios are listed in Table 1. The manufacturing process was performed using two steps. The mixtures were blended using a small mixer (Thermo Scientific™ HAAKE™ Rheomex PTW 16 OS, Waltham, MA, USA) at 190 °C for 3 min using a screw rotation speed of 400 rpm. The blends were then collected, cooled at ambient temperature, and ground into 4 mm particles using a cutting mill grinder (Fritsch PULVERISETTE 25/19, Amberg, Germany). Dog bone-shaped, tensile test specimens were prepared according to ISO 527 standard for plastics and plastic composites. Composites were fabricated using the ground particles through injection molding (Thermo Scientific™ Minijet Pro, Waltham, MA, USA) at 190 °C under a 900 bar pressure. For each formulation, five dog bone-shaped, tensile test specimens were prepared according to ISO 527 standard for plastics and plastic composites.
The color of the composites was investigated, and measurements were performed using a Spektromaster 565-45 spectrophotometer (Erichsen, Hemer, Germany) according to the CIELAB color system. The color measuring instrument has the following characteristics: light source D65; standard observer 10°; spectral range 400–700 nm; spectral resolution 10 nm; aperture size 11 mm; and fixed geometry of measurement 45°/0°. Three repetitions were performed per composite formulation, and the average values were reported.
The mechanical properties of the produced composites were evaluated using tensile strength testing according to ISO 527 over a 50 mm gauge length. Loading was applied at a rate of 5 mm/minute crosshead movement using a Zwick Roell 50KN universal test machine (UTM) (ZwickRoell, Ulm, BW, Germany). Displacement was measured using the UTM crosshead travel. Five repetitions from each formulation were tested. The tensile strength, tensile modulus of elasticity, and strain at failure were determined using test Xpert III software.
Thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis was performed using TGA 5500 (TA Waters Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) using 15 mg samples (three repetitions per composite formulation) placed on platinum pans. The samples were heated at a 10 °C/min rate, and the weight loss was recorded over a temperature range from 25 to 500 °C under 25 mL/min flow of nitrogen gas. Trios software was used to determine the weight derivatives and extract data for T5% and T10%, which correspond to temperatures at which 5% and 10% weight loss was achieved, respectively. Additionally, the temperature at the maximum rate of sample degradation (Tmax) was recorded as the highest point in the peak appearing in the derivative curve (dTG). The final residue percentage at 500 °C was also determined.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis was carried out using DSC 25 (TA Waters Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) using 6 mg samples (three repetitions per composite formulation) placed in aluminum pans sealed with aluminum lids. The samples were subjected to the following heat-cool-heat cycles in a nitrogen gas flow of 50 mL/min:
  • First heating from 30 to 220 °C at 10 °C/min.
  • Cooling from 220 to −30 °C at 10 °C/min.
  • Second heating from −30 to 220 °C at 10 °C/min.
The thermal parameters, i.e., glass transition temperature (Tg), cold crystallization temperature (Tcc), melting temperature (Tm), crystallization temperature (Tc), and enthalpies, were determined.
The degrees of crystallinity of pure and reinforced PLA were calculated using Equation (1):
X % = Δ H m − Δ H c c Δ H m 0 × 100
where ΔHcc and ΔHm are representatives of the cold crystallization and the melting enthalpies, respectively, and Δ H m 0 is the melting enthalpy of 100% crystalline PLA, which is equal to 93.7 J g−1.
The surface hydrophobicity of the composites was evaluated by measuring the dynamic contact angle using an optical tensiometer Attension Theta Flex Auto 4 system (Biolin Scientific, Gothenburg, Sweden) equipped with a 3D topography module. Measurements were made at ambient temperature using a sessile drop test method. For each measurement, a 4 µL distilled water drop was placed on the specimen. Ten contact angle measurements were performed on each specimen, and three specimens were tested per formulation.
The wetting energy (Ewet) was determined using the following Equation (2) [24].
E w e t = γ × c o s θ
where θ is the WCA (at 30 s) and γ is the surface tension of the liquid used during the experiment, which is distilled water in our study (Ewet of distilled water = 72.8 mJ/m2).
Immersion tests were conducted according to ASTM D 570-98 to assess the composites’ water absorption (WA) behavior. The different samples were oven-dried at 50 °C for 24 h and cooled to room temperature in a desiccator to avoid atmospheric humidity absorption. Then, the samples were weighed using an analytical laboratory scale (kern ABT 220-5DNM). Subsequently, the samples were immersed for 24 h and 48 h in distilled water at ambient temperature. After the defined immersion time, the samples were taken out of the water, wiped, and weighed. The WA percentage was calculated using Equation (3):
W A % = m t − m 0 m 0 × 100
where m 0 and mt represent the specimen weight at t = 0 (initial dry weight) and after immersion for t time (24 h and 48 h), respectively. Presented results are the average of three repetitions per composite formulation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of the Fillers

The characteristics of the BC used during this study are summarized in Table 2.
The proximate analysis results reflect a typical composition of wood-derived BC, and values for volatiles and fixed carbon (FC) are comparable with those reported by previous research [25] for pinewood (22% and 73.9% for volatiles and FC, respectively).
D10, D50, and D90 represent the particles’ diameter at 10%, 50%, and 90% of the cumulative size distribution, respectively. The mean particle size was 75 ± 4 µm. Overall, the BC powder was fine, as reflected by the micro-sized particles. The small size of the filler particles is favorable for a uniform distribution within the composites when introduced into the polymeric matrix.
BC’s surface area and pore volume are critical properties that influence performance in different applications. The porosity of carbonaceous materials is commonly composed of micro-pores (0–2 nm in width), meso-pores (2–50 nm in width), and macropores (width > 50 nm) [26]. The physisorption analysis was conducted using nitrogen and CO2 gases to provide a complementary description of the sample’s pores distribution. In fact, nitrogen gas usually determines the outer surface and pores larger than 1 nm because the nitrogen’s access to narrower pores is limited; thus, it does not give a complete estimation of the sample’s porosity. Whereas CO2 specifically gives information about the microporosity of the material [27]. The surface area and porosity of the used BC are higher compared to those of BC derived from applewood: 37.24 m2/g and 0.012 cc/g for surface area (SA) and total pores volume (TPV) from nitrogen gas measurements, respectively and 9.33 m2/g and 0.0016 cc/g for microporous SA and microporous TPV from CO2 measurements, respectively [28]. For pinewood BC prepared at similar temperatures, Meléndez et al. [29] reported slightly higher SA from nitrogen physisorption analysis equal to 267 m2/g; however, they obtained lower values for microporous SA and TPV from carbon dioxide physisorption (159 m2/g and 0.074 cc/g respectively).
The representative average hemp fibers length was 1.5 ± 0.3 mm. Given the length, these fibers would be considered to be “short fibers” for the purpose of reinforcing composites [30].

3.2. Color Measurements of the PLA-Based Composites

One of the challenging requirements for reinforced polymeric composites is to obtain a uniform appearance. The extent of dispersion of the added fillers affects the final material’s morphology, opacity, and color. Figure 1 presents the effect of biochar (BC) addition on the optical features of the composites. A drastic change in the appearance of PLA was visible from the addition of 5 wt% BC. These visual observations were further supported by the CIE Lab test results listed in Table 3.
CIE a* and CIE b* values recorded for neat PLA show that PLA’s color shade tends toward green (negative CIE a*) and yellow (positive CIE b*). The lightness (CIE L*) of PLA reduced sharply after adding BC particles and continued to decrease as the BC content increased because of BC’s black color. Overall, we observed that all the BC-containing specimens tended to have higher greenness and blueness. In contrast, the sample filled only with hemp fibers had higher redness and yellowness represented by positive CIE a* and CIE b*, respectively. Visually, the hemp-PLA sample was characterized by a dark brown color. However, the used hemp fibers had a light brown color typical for natural dry plant fibers. This color change was most likely attributed to the physicochemical modifications during the blending and injection molding at relatively high temperatures (190 °C). Similar findings were demonstrated by Yang et al. [31], who investigated the effect of extrusion temperature on the appearance of wood fibers reinforced-PLA.

3.3. Influence of Biochar Content on the Mechanical Properties of the PLA-Based Composites

Figure 2 provides the stress-strain curves related to tensile testing of PLA-based composites, and Table 4 gathers the obtained tensile properties.
The PLA manufacturer’s technical data sheet listed the tensile modulus of elasticity and strength (determined according to ISO 527-1/-2) as 2300 MPa and 45 MPa, respectively. In this research, the average values of tensile properties found for the neat PLA samples were relatively consistent with the manufacturer’s values, with tensile strength being slightly lower. Compared with the neat PLA formulation, the addition of BC at the 5 wt% loading level enhanced the tensile modulus of elasticity (tensile MOE) by 38%. However, the tensile strength (Rm) decreased slightly (by 5%). However, a further increase in BC content to 10 and 20 wt% led to a successive 21% and 32% reduction in tensile MOE, respectively, and a 16% and 57% reduction in Rm, respectively when compared to PLA 5% BC. PLA-20% BC samples exhibited the poorest mechanical strength where Rm decreased by almost 59% compared to the neat PLA reference. The reduction in properties when the BC content was higher was attributed to the less uniform dispersion of BC within PLA polymers. As the BC content increased above 5%, a higher viscosity was noticed during the processing of the composites in the blending step. For high BC contents, subtle BC aggregates likely appeared, and the consequent low dispersion decreased the interfacial adhesion between the filler and the matrix. Moreover, the aggregations of BC particles would have limited the effective stress transfer between BC particles and PLA chains. Similarly, Moustafa et al. [32] observed aggregation of torrefied coffee powder when loaded at 30% to reinforce poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) matrix. In another study [33], PLA- bamboo-derived BC hybrids were investigated, and results showed that both flexural modulus and strength increased gradually with BC content from 2.5 wt% to 7.5 wt%, then decreased as BC content was raised to 10 wt%. The authors explained that the good compatibility between BC particles and PLA polymers enhanced the extent of interaction between the composite’s components which resulted in stabilizing the system and avoiding the de-bonding between filler and matrix during testing. Nonetheless, when BC content was further increased, BC particles tended to agglomerate and form microcracks responsible for a decrease in the flexural and mechanical properties. In a similar experiment, Arrigo et al. [34] found that the tensile MOE of PLA-BC composites increased proportionally with increasing BC loading from 1 wt% to 7.5 wt%. They attributed this increase in tensile MOE to a good filler dispersion within the polymeric matrix, which led to better bonding between the matrix and filler. Similarly, they reported a slight decrease in the Rm, which was associated with the porous nature of BC that provides micro-voids inside the composites. Nan et al. [20] also observed a 58%, 75%, and 81% decrement in Rm of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) films when adding 2 wt%, 6 wt%, and 10 wt% of hardwood BC, respectively. They attributed the results to the relatively large BC particles’ size (250 µm) and distribution. Regarding nanosized materials, Paiva et al. [35] also reported a 4.8% decrease in strength when using nanosized carbon tubes (2.5 wt%) for reinforcing PVA composites. In this research, they attributed the reduction in strength to the tendency of the nanoparticles to agglomerate, preventing the uniform dispersion within the matrix.
Therefore, in our study, the reduction in Rm in the composites that did not contain short hemp fibers was attributed to the porosity of the used BC (SA and microporous SA equal to 230.8 and 480.0 m2/g, respectively) (Table 2), poor dispersion of the BC filler within the matrix, and large distribution of particles size (size ranges from 11 µm to 155 µm as reported in Table 2). For hemp-PLA (PLA-30% HF) specimens, the average tensile MOE and Rm increased by 113% and 13%, respectively, compared to neat PLA. Hence, the short hemp fibers provided efficient reinforcement of the polymer matrix. In fact, short fibers demonstrated a good strengthening potential when used as filler in thermoplastic composites [36,37]. In a prior study, Sawpan et al. [38] reported higher values for tensile MOE and Rm (approximately 7500 MPa and 66 MPa, respectively) when using 30% hemp fiber loading. Regarding potential reinforcement of the PLA-hemp composites, when 5 wt% BC was added, tensile MOE and Rm increased by 13.2% and 11.6%, respectively. One possible justification for the BC’s positive effect on both tensile MOE and Rm is that the BC may have helped reduce the agglomeration of the hemp fibers, which would normally lead to enhanced overall strength and elasticity of the composite. However, the potential for BC to improve the dispersion of short hemp fibers required further investigation. As the BC content increased to 10 wt%, a slightly lower tensile MOE and higher Rm was observed for the hemp-PLA composites. Kumar et al. [23] also reported enhancements in tensile and flexure strength and flexure modulus when adding up to 1.5% of coconut shell BC prepared at 300 °C and 400 °C to bamboo fibers (40 wt%)-polypropylene (PP) composites. In this same research, however, they reported no improvement in mechanical properties when adding up to 1.5% coconut shell, BC prepared at 600 °C and 900 °C. They attributed the positive effect of BC fillers prepared at lower temperatures to surface functional groups (carboxyl and hydroxyl groups) that improved the filler-matrix compatibility and adhesion. Based on their findings, using BC produced at lower temperatures or modifying the carbonization method to result in higher surface functional groups could potentially improve the hemp-PLA composites produced in our research and warrants additional research.
The strain at break values (Table 4) showed a decreasing trend with the increase of BC content which indicates that plastic deformation was lower when compared to neat PLA. The plastic character of neat PLA was shown by its high strain at break (6.8%). With the introduction of BC in PLA and hemp-PLA composites, the composites exhibited more quasi-brittle behavior under the applied force. Ho et al. [33] found similar results as they observed higher plasticity in the PLA and PLA-2.5 wt% BC samples while the PLA- (5, 7.5, and 10 wt%) BC were more brittle. They suggested that BC particles reduced the plasticity and ductility of PLA matrix and provided higher resistance to deformation.

3.4. Thermal Properties

3.4.1. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermogravimetric analysis was conducted on neat PLA and hemp-PLA composites with and without BC. TGA (TG) and TGA derivatives (dTG) curves of PLA and its composites are represented in Figure 3, and temperatures corresponding to 5% weight loss (T5%), 10% weight loss (T10%), and to the maximum degradation rate (Tmax) are listed in Table 5, as well as the percentage of final residue at 500 °C.
As shown in Figure 3a, the thermal decomposition began at a lower temperature in the case of the three PLA-BC samples, and accordingly, the peak temperatures of the corresponding dTG curves (Figure 3b), indicating the maximum weight loss rate, was 4.25 °C, 6.69 °C, and 12.23 °C lower for PLA reinforced with 5, 10 and 20 wt% BC, respectively compared to the pure PLA. Hence, after the addition of BC particles, the T5%, and T10% decreased proportionally with the increase of BC percentages, which suggests that BC accelerated the thermal degradation of PLA polymers. Prior research [32] explained that the accelerated polymer degradation when BC was included was mainly related to the catalytic effect of potassium present in BC. Potassium can occur in BC as a component of the ash part. In our study, the proximate analysis revealed an ash content of 1.8% (Table 2) of the used BC. However, the presence of potassium in our BC should be confirmed by other techniques. Arrigo et al. [34] similarly reported that T5% and T10% diminished gradually with the addition of spent ground coffee-derived BC (from 1 to 7.5 wt%) to the PLA matrix. They also verified the presence of K (21.6 wt%) in their BC by mean of Energy dispersive X-ray analysis.
The final residue at 500 °C generated by neat PLA is the lowest value among all the composites tested in this study. The final residual amount (Table 5) increased with the increase of BC content which is due to the accumulation of higher char amount able to persist at high temperatures. Similarly, Angin et al. [39] explained that due to the presence of BC, a compact layer with high char content was formed, and as a consequence, the residual amount increased.
The addition of 30% hemp fibers to the PLA matrix shifted the thermal decomposition of the hemp-PLA composites to higher temperatures compared to the neat PLA. Hemp fibers are mainly composed of cellulose, moreover hemicellulose, lignin, soluble and organic matter [10] that have different thermal resistances. Lignin is reported to slowly decompose from ambient temperature to 900 °C [40], followed by the decomposition of hemicellulose occurring between 220 °C and 315 °C [40], and the decomposition of cellulose between 315 °C and 400 °C [40]. Thus, the improvement in thermal resistance is due to the high cellulose content in hemp fibers. Indeed, Marrot et al. [17] reported a 77–80% w/rw cellulose of the dry material. Thus, the improvement in thermal resistance is due to the high cellulose content in hemp fibers, which decomposition temperature range is higher than the PLA’s one. The high standard deviations found for PLA-30% HF (for T5% and T10%) indicate a non-uniform dispersion of the fibers during the preparation process. Upon incorporation of 5 wt% BC in the hemp-PLA composites, T5% and T10% increased by 4.4 °C and 2 °C, respectively, indicating an enhancement in the thermal resistance. However, a further increase in BC content to 10 wt% resulted in a slight decrease of the degradation temperature points.

3.4.2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

The effect of BC additive on thermal transitions of PLA and hemp-PLA composites was evaluated using DSC analysis. The first heating cycle is performed to eliminate the thermal history of the polymeric material [35]. As such, data retrieved from the second heating cycle were considered for discussion. Figure 4 represents the corresponding DSC thermogram corresponding to the second heating cycle. The glass transition temperature (Tg), cold crystallization temperature (Tcc), melting temperature (Tm), crystallization temperature (Tc), and crystallinity degree (Xc) of neat and reinforced PLA composites are summarized in Table 6.
Results for PLA-BC samples showed that the addition of 5 wt% and 10 wt% BC did not have a visible effect on the Tg of PLA polymer. However, 20 wt% BC decreased the Tg value from 58.8 °C to 52.9 °C, which indicates that a high amount of BC increased the mobility of PLA molecular chains. Chen et al. [41] studied the isotherms of PLA reinforced by variable concentrations of recycled grains derived from the distillation of Chinese spirits (from 10 wt% to 50 wt%). Their results suggested that Tg diminished with the increase of filler content because of the occurrence of polar groups in the filler’s molecules. These polar groups were responsible for high electrostatic repulsions within the composites’ matrixes, which increased the spaces between the polymeric chains of PLA, and in turn, the Tg dropped. On the contrary, the addition of hemp fibers did not affect the PLA’s Tg, and the further addition of 5 and 10% BC in the hemp-PLA composites did not lead to a significant decrease of the Tg.
The broad exothermic peak after the Tg corresponds to cold crystallization phenomena. For neat PLA, the cold crystallization peak was very low. However, for the other composites, the corresponding peaks were more visible. In the case of PLA-BC composites, a visible decrease in Tcc was correlated with the increasing BC loadings. Arrigo et al. [34] reported similar findings and stated that the BC filler enhanced the degradation of PLA molecules. As a result, the molecular mass of the molecules was lowered, and they became more mobile which favored the appearance of cold crystallization peaks at lower temperatures. The same trend was observed for the addition of BC in hemp-PLA composites, but results were less marked since the addition of hemp fibers counterbalanced this effect by slightly increasing the Tcc.
Regarding the melting phase, thermograms of PLA and PLA charged with 5% BC presented a single peak, whereas a double melting peak appeared when BC loading was beyond 5 wt% (Figure 4). Arrigo et al. [34] observed the double melting peak when BC exceeded 1 wt% loading in PLA. They proposed that the double melting peak could be explained by two different phenomena. The lamellar thickness model ([42,43]) suggests that two types of crystal lamellae with different thicknesses are present. Thus, the first endothermic peak corresponds to the melting of the thinner lamellae, while the thicker lamellae would melt at a higher temperature resulting in a second endothermic peak. The melting-recrystallization model ([44,45]) proposes that the melting of the existent lamellae is responsible for the appearance of the first peak, and these melted lamellae will then tend to recrystallize to form more organized lamellae which would need a higher temperature to melt and in turn generate a second peak. In our study, all the hemp-PLA composites also presented a double melting behavior. Similarly, Zhu et al. [46] observed one melting peak for PLA while PLA-sisal fibers composites presented two peaks. They explained that due to the complex crystallization process of polymers, the melting of different crystals type would happen differently during the heating and melting phases. Indeed, in the case of polymeric composites, transverse crystals may appear on the surface of the fillers when mixed with the semi-crystalline polymeric matrix and result in a second peak [47]. This explanation is applicable to justify our findings. Moreover, in our work, an additional separated peak appeared before the melting peak for PLA−20% BC and for the hemp-PLA composites (Figure 4). This peak may be attributed to poor blending of the fillers inside the PLA with the addition of fibers or a sufficient amount of BC. Tm values decreased when BC was added to pure PLA, which indicates that BC acted as a catalyst for the melting of the polymeric matrix to the detriment of the thermal stability of the samples. Regarding hemp-PLA composites with and without BC, slightly higher Tm was found as compared to neat PLA. These results are in accordance with those of TGA.
During the cooling cycle, the addition of BC to both PLA and hemp-PLA composites generated a slight increase in the Tc (Table 6), indicating that BC addition retarded the crystallization phase by limiting the connections between PLA chains. Furthermore, the crystallinity degree (Xc) fluctuated differently from one sample to another. Overall, most of the samples had a smaller Xc compared to neat PLA except for the two hemp-PLA composites with 5 and 10 wt% BC that had higher Xc. In general, molecular chains are rearranged during the crystallization process. PLA’s molecular chain integrity was disrupted after the incorporation of filler which influenced the mobility of PLA molecules and led to a change in the crystallinity degree [39,48,49]. In addition, the decrease in crystallinity might be related to the degradation and re-crystallization of polymer chains during the composites’ preparation process (i.e., during extrusion and injection molding) [39]. For hybrid samples containing both BC and hemp fibers, the Xc was higher compared to neat PLA. The same phenomenon was observed previously in PLA-wood flour composites when glass fibers were added, as the results indicated a filler-matrix interaction on the interface of the crystal layer [39].

3.5. Hygroscopic Properties

3.5.1. Water Contact Angle Measurements

The wetting behavior of the PLA-based composites was assessed by water contact angle (WCA) measurements which were recorded over a period of 30 s. Results are used to describe the water repellency ability of the studied samples. Good reproducibility of the WCA measurements was observed between the ten drops deposited separately with 10 mm spacing, relating a uniform surface of the composites. The WCA remained constant for all the samples from the deposition of the drop until the end of the test. For comparison, the WCA of PLA and hemp-PLA composites after 30 s were reported in Table 7.
For PLA-BC samples, the WCA decreased gradually by 3.3%, 4.3%, and 40% after incorporation of 5 wt%, 10 wt%, and 20 wt% of BC, respectively. Specifically, loading up to 20 wt% BC changed the composite nature from hydrophobic (WCA > 90°) to hydrophilic (WCA < 90°), according to Law’s definitions [50]. Generally, BC’s wettability is governed mainly by two key parameters: the origin feedstock and the carbonization temperature. Kinney et al. [51] investigated the changes in hydrophobicity of BC derived from three different biomasses (Magnolia leaf, corn stover, and applewood) prepared with temperatures ranging from 300 °C to 700 °C. They observed that BC’s hydrophobicity diminished proportionally as the pyrolysis temperature increased, with minimal hydrophobicity being correlated with BC prepared at temperatures between 400 °C and 600 °C. In our study, the BC was prepared at 550 °C, which could have resulted in a more hydrophilic BC. Therefore, when 20 wt% was added to PLA, the surface of the composite changed to be more hydrophilic.
The addition of hemp fibers in PLA lowered the WCA by 10.7% compared to neat PLA control. The hydrophilic character of natural fibers attributed to the presence of polar groups (namely hydroxyl groups) is responsible for the drop of WCA at the surface of the composite. Similar results were observed previously for Eucalyptus fibers reinforced-PLA [52]. Hemp fibers were characterized by high cellulose and hemicelluloses content [10], which give them a hydrophilic character. In general, polysaccharides are known to influence surface properties when used in polymeric composites as fillers; one of their main effects is to lessen the water repellency of the materials. Despite this decrease caused by hemp fibers, the value of WCA obtained in this study (up to 109°) is still higher compared to the 85° reported in prior research [41] for PLA reinforced by 30 wt% distiller’s grain (a by-product from ethanol fuel industries) fibers.
When 5 wt% BC was added to the hemp-PLA sample, the WCA increased slightly by 4.6%, which indicates that BC tended to stabilize the interaction between PLA and hemp fibers polymeric chains and helped to maintain a compact structure with tight connection by making the polar groups less available on the surface of the composites. BC might cancel the repulsion forces at the interface between hemp fibers and PLA, which led to a more compact and tight structure and enhanced the hydrophobicity. However, further increase in BC loading up to 10 wt% decreased the surface WCA.
Ewet corresponds to the energy required to wet the material. The wetting energy provides a quantitative measure of the intermolecular forces occurring at the surface of a material in the presence of a liquid. Ewet tends to be higher in the case of more wettable composites (i.e., hydrophilic composites). Based on our results (Table 7), we found that samples with lower WCA had higher Ewet, which agrees with the wetting law principles stating that when energy on the interface is low, the wettability (i.e., wetting) of a liquid on the surface is less favorable, which in turn will result in higher hydrophobicity [53].

3.5.2. Water Absorption Measurements

The results collected from the water absorption immersion test are shown in Table 7. The reported values correspond to the averages from three repetitions per sample. Overall, all the specimens gradually absorbed water. The water uptake rate was faster during the first 24 h then was reduced as the composites retained more water.
Compared to the reference PLA, the WA after 24 h increased steadily with the increase of BC content by 51%, 110%, and 139% for 5, 10, and 20 wt% BC, respectively. Similarly, by including the hemp fibers, the water uptake dramatically increased. In fact, for the hemp-PLA specimens, the WA increased by 312%. Similar findings were also found by Silva et al. [52], who commented that the incorporation of eucalyptus fibers in PLA led to an increment in the overall permeability and diffusion velocity of water molecules in the studied composites. Chen et al. [41] explained the increase of the WA rate in the PLA distiller’s grain fibers composites with the occurrence of hydroxyl groups in natural polymers (i.e., cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin). Finally, the WA of hemp-PLA continued to increase as the BC was added. These results can be assigned to the hydrophilic nature of the used BC that was discussed previously in the WCA section.
In the same context, Kumar et al. [23] investigated the effect of BC filler derived from bamboo and coconut shell biomasses on the properties of PP-bamboo fibers composites. They found that the increase in water uptake is mainly due to the ability of BC and plant fibers to absorb water. In the same study [23], the effect of pyrolysis temperature at which BC was prepared was evaluated, and the results indicated that for an equal loading of filler, BC carbonized at low temperature (300 °C) was correlated with lower WA percentage. BC prepared at higher temperatures often exhibits higher porosity which contributes to increasing the water uptake. The WA results found in our study are further confirmed by the information from physisorption analysis (Table 2) that informed about the developed porosity of our BC powder. Indeed, the presence of pores and cavities in the BC particles can facilitate water diffusion from the outside environment into the composites acting as transport channels. Another explanation was provided by Eselini et al. [54], who observed an increased WA for PLA reinforced with 30 wt% flax fiber. They reported that the lack of adhesion between the matrix and the filler contributed to the formation of micro-voids in the internal structure of the composite responsible for increasing the water uptake. In a similar experiment [41], the increase of WA rate in PLA-grain fibers composites was explained by the occurrence of hydroxyl groups in natural polymers (i.e., cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin).
Overall, the results from the immersion test are in accordance with the results of WCA analysis. BC addition tended to reduce the water resistance of PLA and hemp-PLA composites. The use of BC produced at lower temperatures with higher hydrophobicity and lower porosity could be more suitable to improve the water resistance.

4. Conclusions

At present, research on polymeric bio-composites is experiencing rapid growth. In this present study, the color, mechanical, thermal, and hygroscopic features of biochar (BC) reinforced PLA and hemp-PLA composites were examined. The tensile test results showed that BC could improve the tensile modulus of elasticity and tensile strength of both PLA and hemp-PLA composites when added at 5 wt% loadings. Nonetheless, more than 5 wt% of BC resulted in lower mechanical strength compared to the reference samples due to the poor dispersion as BC particles usually tend to agglomerate. The uniform dispersion of the filler in the polymeric matrix is a key requirement to be fulfilled as it directly influences the strength of the materials. The TGA and DSC isotherms showed that BC slightly decreased the thermal stability by increasing the degradation of PLA polymers due to the BC’s catalytic effect. Moreover, the crystallization of PLA was hindered by the presence of BC. Lastly, BC lowered the water repellency of PLA and hemp-PLA composites, which was manifested by a decrease in hydrophobicity and an increase in the water absorbance. The decrease in water repellency was mainly attributed to the hydrophilic character and developed porosity of the used BC.
In view of limiting the price of PLA by introducing fillers while maintaining satisfying overall performance of PLA composites, biochar (BC) is an interesting candidate when introduced for up to 5 wt% of PLA or hemp/PLA in the case of bio-composites production. An optimization of BC properties to specifically target the composite applications, i.e., increasing hydrophobicity and decreasing porosity, could help improve the water repellency and potentially facilitate the dispersion of the fillers that was penalizing the mechanical performance of composites. Moreover, it might be of interest to consider using a compatibilizer when preparing the composites as it could promote better matrix-filler interaction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.; methodology, M.Z.; validation, M.Z. and L.M.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, M.Z. and L.M.; resources, L.M. and D.B.D.; data curation, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.M. and D.B.D.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, L.M. and D.B.D.; project administration, L.M. and D.B.D.; funding acquisition, L.M. and D.B.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Commission through the InnoRenew project (Grant agreement #739574 under the Horizon 2020 WIDESPREAD-2-Teaming program) and the Republic of Slovenia (investment funding from the Republic of Slovenia and the European Regional Development Fund), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (Grant Number 898179) and the ARRS infrastructural program IO-0035 at the University of Primorska.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bourmaud, A.; Beaugrand, J.; Shah, D.U.; Placet, V.; Baley, C. Towards the design of high-performance plant fibre composites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 97, 347–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hartmann, M.H. High molecular weight polylactic acid polymers. In Biopolymers from Renewable Resources; Kaplan, D.L., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; pp. 367–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Auras, R.A.; Harte, B.; Selke, S.; Hernandez, R. Mechanical, Physical, and Barrier Properties of Poly(Lactide) Films. J. Plast. Film Sheeting 2003, 19, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jamshidian, M.; Tehrany, E.A.; Imran, M.; Jacquot, M.; Desobry, S. Poly-Lactic Acid: Production, Applications, Nanocomposites, and Release Studies. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 552–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rasal, R.M.; Hirt, D.E. Toughness decrease of PLA-PHBHHx blend films upon surface-confined photopolymerization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2009, 88, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Le Duigou, A.; Davies, P.; Baley, C. Macroscopic analysis of interfacial properties of flax/PLLA biocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 1612–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Siakeng, R.; Jawaid, M.; Ariffin, H.; Sapuan, S.M.; Asim, M.; Saba, N. Natural fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites: A review. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 446–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alao, P.F.; Marrot, L.; Burnard, M.D.; Lavrič, G.; Saarna, M.; Kers, J. Impact of Alkali and Silane Treatment on Hemp/PLA Composites’ Performance: From Micro to Macro Scale. Polymers 2021, 13, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alao, P.; Marrot, L.; Kallakas, H.; Just, A.; Poltimäe, T.; Kers, J. Effect of Hemp Fiber Surface Treatment on the Moisture/Water Resistance and Reaction to Fire of Reinforced PLA Composites. Materials 2021, 14, 4332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Marrot, L.; Alao, P.F.; Mikli, V.; Kers, J. Properties of Frost-Retted Hemp Fibers for the Reinforcement of Composites. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sohi, S.P. Carbon Storage with Benefits. Science 2012, 338, 1034–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Basu, P. Pyrolysis. In Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 147–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vivekanandhan, S. Biochar as sustainable reinforcement for polymer composites. In Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, N.; Pilla, S. A comprehensive review on transforming lignocellulosic materials into biocarbon and its utilization for composites applications. Compos. Part C: Open Access 2021, 7, 100225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zornoza, R.; Moreno-Barriga, J.A.; Acosta, J.A.; Muñoz, M.A.; Faz, A. Stability, nutrient availability and hydrophobicity of biochars derived from manure, crop residues, and municipal solid waste for their use as soil amendments. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Giorcelli, M.; Bartoli, M. Development of Coffee Biochar Filler for the Production of Electrical Conductive Reinforced Plastic. Polymers 2019, 11, 1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Marrot, L.; Candelier, K.; Valette, J.; Lanvin, C.; Horvat, B.; Legan, L.; DeVallance, D.B. Valorization of Hemp Stalk Waste Through Thermochemical Conversion for Energy and Electrical Applications. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 13, 2267–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Plötze, M.; Niemz, P. Porosity and pore size distribution of different wood types as determined by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Holz Als Roh- Und Werkst. 2010, 69, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Aup-Ngoen, K.; Noipitak, M. Effect of carbon-rich biochar on mechanical properties of PLA-biochar composites. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2020, 15, 100204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nan, N.; DeVallance, D.B.; Xie, X.; Wang, J. The effect of bio-carbon addition on the electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties of polyvinyl alcohol/biochar composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2015, 50, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. DeVallance, D.B.; Oporto, G.S.; Quigley, P. Investigation of hardwood biochar as a replacement for wood flour in wood–polypropylene composites. J. Elastomers Plast. 2015, 48, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Das, O.; Sarmah, A.K.; Bhattacharyya, D. A novel approach in organic waste utilization through biochar addition in wood/polypropylene composites. Waste Manag. 2015, 38, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kumar, R.; Gunjal, J.; Chauhan, S. Effect of carbonization temperature on properties of natural fiber and charcoal filled hybrid polymer composite. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2021, 217, 108846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rhim, J.-W.; Mohanty, K.A.; Singh, A.S.P.; Ng, P.K.W. Preparation and Properties of Biodegradable Multilayer Films Based on Soy Protein Isolate and Poly(lactide). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crombie, K.; Mašek, O.; Sohi, S.P.; Brownsort, P.; Cross, A. The effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar stability as determined by three methods. GCB Bioenergy 2012, 5, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sing, K.S.W. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Condon, J.B. Surface Area and Porosity Determinations by Physisorption: Measurements and Theory; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhao, S.-X.; Ta, N.; Wang, X.-D. Effect of Temperature on the Structural and Physicochemical Properties of Biochar with Apple Tree Branches as Feedstock Material. Energies 2017, 10, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Masís-Meléndez, F.; Segura-Chavarría, D.; A García-González, C.; Quesada-Kimsey, J.; Villagra-Mendoza, K. Variability of Physical and Chemical Properties of TLUD Stove Derived Biochars. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Etaati, A.; Pather, S.; Rahman, M.; Wang, H. Ground Hemp Fibers as Filler/Reinforcement for Thermoplastic Biocomposites. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 2015, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Yang, T.-C. Effect of Extrusion Temperature on the Physico-Mechanical Properties of Unidirectional Wood Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid Composite (WFRPC) Components Using Fused Deposition Modeling. Polymers 2018, 10, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Moustafa, H.; Guizani, C.; Dupont, C.; Martin, V.; Jeguirim, M.; Dufresne, A. Utilization of Torrefied Coffee Grounds as Reinforcing Agent To Produce High-Quality Biodegradable PBAT Composites for Food Packaging Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 5, 1906–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ho, M.-P.; Lau, K.-T.; Wang, H.; Hui, D. Improvement on the properties of polylactic acid (PLA) using bamboo charcoal particles. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 81, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arrigo, R.; Bartoli, M.; Malucelli, G. Poly(lactic Acid)–Biochar Biocomposites: Effect of Processing and Filler Content on Rheological, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2020, 12, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Paiva, M.C.; Zhou, B.; Fernando, K.A.S.; Lin, Y.; Kennedy, J.M.; Sun, Y.-P. Mechanical and morphological characterization of polymer–carbon nanocomposites from functionalized carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2004, 42, 2849–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tanguy, M.; Bourmaud, A.; Beaugrand, J.; Gaudry, T.; Baley, C. Polypropylene reinforcement with flax or jute fibre; Influence of microstructure and constituents properties on the performance of composite. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2018, 139, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ausias, G.; Bourmaud, A.; Coroller, G.; Baley, C. Study of the fibre morphology stability in polypropylene-flax composites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 1216–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sawpan, M.A.; Pickering, K.L.; Fernyhough, A. Improvement of mechanical performance of industrial hemp fibre reinforced polylactide biocomposites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2011, 42, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Angin, N.; Caylak, S.; Ertas, M.; Cavdar, A.D. Effect of alkyl ketene dimer on chemical and thermal properties of polylactic acid (PLA) hybrid composites. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2022, e00386, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, H.; Yan, R.; Chen, H.; Lee, D.H.; Zheng, C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007, 86, 1781–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Z.-J.; Tsou, C.-H.; Tsai, M.-L.; Guo, J.; De Guzman, M.R.; Yang, T.; Gao, C.; Lei, Y.; Gan, P.-W.; Chen, S.; et al. Barrier properties and hydrophobicity of biodegradable poly(lactic acid) composites reinforced with recycled chinese spirits distiller’s grains. Polymers 2021, 13, 2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bassett, D.C.; Olley, R.H.; AL Alraheil, I.A.M. On crystallization phenomena in PEEK. Polymer 1988, 29, 1745–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cebe, P.; Hong, S.-D. Crystallization behaviour of poly(ether-ether-ketone). Polymer 1986, 27, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jonas, A.M.; Russell, T.P.; Yoon, D.Y. Synchrotron X-ray Scattering Studies of Crystallization of Poly(ether-ether-ketone) from the Glass and Structural Changes during Subsequent Heating-Cooling Processes. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8491–8503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, Y.; Porter, R.S.; Lin, J.S. On the double-melting behavior of poly(ether ether ketone). Macromolecules 1989, 22, 1756–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, Z.H.; Zhang, N.; Wang, T.; Hao, M.Y. Analysis of crystallization and melting behavior of composites before and after annealing. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 733, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Campbell, D.; Qayyum, M.M. Melt crystallization of polypropylene: Effect of contact with fiber substrates. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1980, 18, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guo, Y.; Zhu, S.; Chen, Y.; Li, D. Thermal Properties of Wood-Plastic Composites with Different Compositions. Materials 2019, 12, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Saeidlou, S.; Huneault, M.A.; Li, H.; Park, C.B. Poly(lactic acid) crystallization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1657–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Law, K.-Y. Definitions for Hydrophilicity, Hydrophobicity, and Superhydrophobicity: Getting the Basics Right. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 686–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kinney, T.J.; Masiello, C.A.; Dugan, B.; Hockaday, W.C.; Dean, M.R.; Zygourakis, K.; Barnes, R.T. Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 41, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Silva, C.G.; Campini, P.A.L.; Rocha, D.B.; Rosa, D.S. The influence of treated eucalyptus microfibers on the properties of PLA biocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 179, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jose, J.P.; Abraham, J.; Maria, H.J.; Varughese, K.T.; Thomas, S. Contact Angle Studies in XLPE Hybrid Nanocomposites with Inorganic Nanofillers. Macromol. Symp. 2016, 366, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Eselini, N.; Tirkes, S.; Akar, A.O.; Tayfun, U. Production and characterization of poly (lactic acid)-based biocomposites filled with basalt fiber and flax fiber hybrid. J. Elastomers Plast. 2019, 52, 701–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 02271 g001 550
Figure 1. PLA and reinforced PLA composites.
Figure 1. PLA and reinforced PLA composites.
Materials 15 02271 g001
Materials 15 02271 g002 550
Figure 2. Stress-strain plots of PLA-based composites.
Figure 2. Stress-strain plots of PLA-based composites.
Materials 15 02271 g002
Materials 15 02271 g003a 550Materials 15 02271 g003b 550
Figure 3. TG (a) and dTG (b) thermograms of PLA-based composites.
Figure 3. TG (a) and dTG (b) thermograms of PLA-based composites.
Materials 15 02271 g003aMaterials 15 02271 g003b
Materials 15 02271 g004 550
Figure 4. DSC thermogram from the second heating cycle of the PLA-based composites.
Figure 4. DSC thermogram from the second heating cycle of the PLA-based composites.
Materials 15 02271 g004
Table
Table 1. Formulations of the prepared PLA-based composites.
Table 1. Formulations of the prepared PLA-based composites.
SamplePLA (wt%)Hemp Fibers (wt%)Biochar (wt%)
PLA10000
PLA-5% BC9505
PLA-10% BC90010
PLA-20% BC80020
PLA-30% HF70300
PLA-30% HF-5% BC65305
PLA-30% HF-10% BC603010
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of beechwood biochar used for PLA reinforcement.
Table 2. Characteristics of beechwood biochar used for PLA reinforcement.
Proximate AnalysisParticles Size Analysis
Parameters1 M, %2 V, %Ash, %3 FC, %D10, µmD50, µmD90, µm
Results4.1 ± 0.116.3 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.177.8 ± 0.311 ± 160 ± 7155 ± 5
Physisorption gas4 SA, m2/g5 TPV, cc/g6 PW, nm
Nitrogen230.80.1312.351
CO2480.00.1330.349
1 M: Moisture, 2 V: Volatiles, 3 FC: Fixed Carbon 4 SA: surface area, 5 TVP: total pores volume, 6 PW: average pores width.
Table
Table 3. Surface color analysis results of PLA-based composites according to the CIELAB color system (CIE L*, CIE a* and CIE b* coordinates).
Table 3. Surface color analysis results of PLA-based composites according to the CIELAB color system (CIE L*, CIE a* and CIE b* coordinates).
SampleCIE L*CIE a*CIE b*
PLA90.3 ± 0.4−0.4 ± 0.04.8 ± 0.1
PLA-5% BC27.8 ± 0.8−0.5 ± 0.1−6.7 ± 0.1
PLA-10% BC24.2 ± 0.7−0.4 ± 0.1−4.6 ± 0.3
PLA-20% BC13.8 ± 0.50.1 ± 0.0−0.6 ± 0.3
PLA-30% HF40.0 ± 2.52.9 ± 1.07.7 ± 2.7
PLA-30% HF-5% BC21.2 ± 1.2−0.1 ± 0.0−1.5 ± 0.6
PLA-30% HF-10% BC16.4 ± 0.3−0.2 ± 0.0−1.9 ± 0.1
Table
Table 4. Tensile properties of the PLA-based composite specimens.
Table 4. Tensile properties of the PLA-based composite specimens.
SampleTensile Modulus of Elasticity, MPaTensile Strength, MPaStrain at Break, %
PLA2418 ± 23739 ± 56.8 ± 0.7
PLA-5% BC3334 ± 25637 ± 32.7 ± 0.3
PLA-10% BC2649 ± 64831 ± 61.8 ± 0.3
PLA-20% BC2269 ± 11516 ± 70.8 ± 0.3
PLA-30% HF5158 ± 65244 ± 12.0 ± 0.1
PLA-30% HF-5% BC5841 ± 79249 ± 52.1 ± 0.1
PLA-30% HF-10% BC4992 ± 75751 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.3
Table
Table 5. TGA analysis results of PLA-based composites.
Table 5. TGA analysis results of PLA-based composites.
Sample1T5%, °C2T10%, °C3Tmax, °CResidue500 °C, %
PLA301.36 ± 6.38312.88 ± 5.58335.93 ± 0.473.92 ± 0.20
PLA-5% BC297.76 ± 2.26308.34 ± 2.57331.68 ± 0.868.35 ± 0.11
PLA-10% BC297.08 ± 5.69304.86 ± 6.00329.24 ± 0.7113.15 ± 0.12
PLA-20% BC289.76 ± 1.54302.42 ± 1.68323.70 ± 0.9422.09 ± 0.04
PLA-30% HF314.58 ± 13.63328.31 ± 8.92352.55 ± 1.648.54 ± 0.02
PLA-30% HF-5% BC318.99 ± 2.59330.34 ± 1.36351.08 ± 0.6311.72 ± 0.48
PLA-30% HF-10% BC311.71 ± 1.98327.00 ± 0.75349.66 ± 1.4915.21 ± 0.04
1 T5%: Temperature at 5% weight loss, 2 T10%: Temperature at 10% weight loss, 3 Tmax: Temperature at maximum degradation rate.
Table
Table 6. DSC analysis results of PLA-based composites.
Table 6. DSC analysis results of PLA-based composites.
SampleTg, °CTcc, °CTm, °CTc, °CXc, %
PLA58.8 ± 0.3121.1 ± 0.8149.6 ± 0.283.4 ± 0.15.7 ± 0.1
PLA-5% BC59.3 ± 0.3116.6 ± 0.4149.1 ± 0.484.9 ± 0.22.5 ± 0.1
PLA-10% BC57.7 ± 0.9112.8 ± 0.9147.1 ± 0.584.9 ± 0.14.1 ± 0.0
PLA-20% BC52.9 ± 0.2107.8 ± 0.3146.5 ± 0.784.3 ± 0.14.5 ± 0.1
PLA-30% HF58.6 ± 0.3125.5 ± 0.4150.3 ± 0.186.5 ± 0.14.1 ± 0.0
PLA-30% HF-5% BC58.7 ± 0.1121.5 ± 0.5150.0 ± 0.287.6 ± 0.210.9 ± 0.2
PLA-30% HF-10% BC58.6 ± 0.1121.6 ± 1.0150.0 ± 0.187.2 ± 0.16.7 ± 0.1
Table
Table 7. Water contact angle, wetting energy, and water absorption results of PLA-based composites.
Table 7. Water contact angle, wetting energy, and water absorption results of PLA-based composites.
SampleWCA, °Ewet, mJ/m2Water Absorption, %
__24 h48 h
PLA122 ± 45 ± 00.4 ± 0.00.6 ± 0.1
PLA-5% BC118 ± 222 ± 30.6 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.0
PLA-10% BC117 ± 229 ± 20.9 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.3
PLA-20% BC73 ± 343 ± 21.4 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.1
PLA-30% HF109 ± 26 ± 11.7 ± 0.02.3 ± 0.1
PLA-30% HF-5% BC114 ± 33 ± 01.5 ± 0.02.1 ± 0.1
PLA-30% HF-10% BC107 ± 310 ± 11.8 ± 0.03.5 ± 0.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zouari, M.; Devallance, D.B.; Marrot, L. Effect of Biochar Addition on Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability, and Water Resistance of Hemp-Polylactic Acid (PLA) Composites. Materials 2022, 15, 2271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062271

AMA Style

Zouari M, Devallance DB, Marrot L. Effect of Biochar Addition on Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability, and Water Resistance of Hemp-Polylactic Acid (PLA) Composites. Materials. 2022; 15(6):2271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zouari, Mariem, David B. Devallance, and Laetitia Marrot. 2022. "Effect of Biochar Addition on Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability, and Water Resistance of Hemp-Polylactic Acid (PLA) Composites" Materials 15, no. 6: 2271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062271

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop