Next Article in Journal
Biosorptive Removal of Ethacridine Lactate from Aqueous Solutions by Saccharomyces pastorianus Residual Biomass/Calcium Alginate Composite Beads: Fixed-Bed Column Study
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Antimicrobial Effect of Novel Electrospun Polylactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite Nanofibres Loaded with Doxycycline
Previous Article in Journal
Dealumination and Characterization of Natural Mordenite-Rich Tuffs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biocompatibility of ZrO2 vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography

Jean Lamour Institute, University of Lorraine, UMR 7198, 54011 Nancy, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(13), 4655; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134655
Submission received: 2 June 2022 / Revised: 21 June 2022 / Accepted: 29 June 2022 / Published: 1 July 2022

Abstract

The osseointegration of implants is defined as the direct anatomical and functional connection between neoformed living bone and the surface of a supporting implant. The biological compatibility of implants depends on various parameters, such as the nature of the material, chemical composition, surface topography, chemistry and loading, surface treatment, and physical and mechanical properties. In this context, the objective of this study is to evaluate the biocompatibility of rough (Ra = 1 µm) and smooth (Ra = 0 µm) surface conditions of yttria–zirconia (Y-TZP) discs compared to pure zirconia (ZrO2) discs by combining a classical toxicological test, morphological observations by SEM, and a transcriptomic analysis on an in vitro model of human Saos-2 bone cells. Similar cell proliferation rates were observed between ZrO2 and Y-TZP discs and control cells, regardless of the surface topography, at up to 96 h of exposure. Dense cell matting was similarly observed on the surfaces of both materials. Interestingly, only 110 transcripts were differentially expressed across the human transcriptome, consistent with the excellent biocompatibility of Y-TZP reported in the literature. These deregulated transcripts are mainly involved in two pathways, the first being related to “mineral uptake” and the second being the “immune response”. These observations suggest that Y-TZP is an interesting candidate for application in implantology.
Keywords: osseointegration; biocompatibility; zirconia; yttria–zirconia; surface topography; proliferation; morphology; transcriptome osseointegration; biocompatibility; zirconia; yttria–zirconia; surface topography; proliferation; morphology; transcriptome

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tchinda, A.; Chézeau, L.; Pierson, G.; Kouitat-Njiwa, R.; Rihn, B.H.; Bravetti, P. Biocompatibility of ZrO2 vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography. Materials 2022, 15, 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134655

AMA Style

Tchinda A, Chézeau L, Pierson G, Kouitat-Njiwa R, Rihn BH, Bravetti P. Biocompatibility of ZrO2 vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography. Materials. 2022; 15(13):4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134655

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tchinda, Alex, Laëtitia Chézeau, Gaël Pierson, Richard Kouitat-Njiwa, B H Rihn, and Pierre Bravetti. 2022. "Biocompatibility of ZrO2 vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography" Materials 15, no. 13: 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134655

APA Style

Tchinda, A., Chézeau, L., Pierson, G., Kouitat-Njiwa, R., Rihn, B. H., & Bravetti, P. (2022). Biocompatibility of ZrO2 vs. Y-TZP Alloys: Influence of Their Composition and Surface Topography. Materials, 15(13), 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134655

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop