Next Article in Journal
Chloride Ions’ Penetration of Fly Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slags-Based Alkali-Activated Mortars
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study on the Quality of Microcrystalline and Epitaxial Silicon Films Produced by PECVD Using Identical SiF4 Based Process Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Augmentation Stability of Guided Bone Regeneration for Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects with L-shaped Porcine-Derived Block Bone Substitute
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Vapor Deposited Mixed Metal Halide Perovskite Thin Films
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 21
10.3390/ma14216582
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Graded Silicon Content in SRN/SRO Multilayer Structures on the Si Nanocrystals and Si Nanopyramids Formation and Their Photoluminescence Response

by
José Juan Avilés Bravo
1,
Santiago Antonio Cabañas Tay
1,
Liliana Palacios Huerta
1,
Karla Esther González Flores
2,
Javier Flores Méndez
3,
Mario Moreno Moreno
1 and
Alfredo Morales Sánchez
1,*
1
Electronics Department, INAOE, Apartado 51, Puebla 72000, Mexico
2
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados S.C., Unidad Monterrey-PIIT, Apodaca 66600, Nuevo León, Mexico
3
Electronics Department, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla 72590, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(21), 6582; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216582
Submission received: 15 October 2021 / Revised: 29 October 2021 / Accepted: 29 October 2021 / Published: 2 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CVD Deposition and Characterization of Multilayers and Thin Films)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two multilayer (ML) structures, composed of five layers of silicon-rich oxide (SRO) with different Si contents and a sixth layer of silicon-rich nitride (SRN), were deposited by low pressure chemical vapor deposition. These SRN/SRO MLs were thermally annealed at 1100 °C for 180 min in ambient N2 to induce the formation of Si nanostructures. For the first ML structure (MLA), the excess Si in each SRO layer was about 10.7 ± 0.6, 9.1 ± 0.4, 8.0 ± 0.2, 9.1 ± 0.3 and 9.7 ± 0.4 at.%, respectively. For the second ML structure (MLB), the excess Si was about 8.3 ± 0.2, 10.8 ± 0.4, 13.6 ± 1.2, 9.8 ± 0.4 and 8.7 ± 0.1 at.%, respectively. Si nanopyramids (Si-NPs) were formed in the SRO/Si substrate interface when the SRO layer with the highest excess silicon (10.7 at.%) was deposited next to the MLA substrate. The height, base and density of the Si-NPs was about 2–8 nm, 8–26 nm and ~6 × 1011 cm−2, respectively. In addition, Si nanocrystals (Si-ncs) with a mean size of between 3.95 ± 0.20 nm and 2.86 ± 0.81 nm were observed for the subsequent SRO layers. Meanwhile, Si-NPs were not observed when the excess Si in the SRO film next to the Si-substrate decreased to 8.3 ± 0.2 at.% (MLB), indicating that there existed a specific amount of excess Si for their formation. Si-ncs with mean size of 2.87 ± 0.73 nm and 3.72 ± 1.03 nm were observed for MLB, depending on the amount of excess Si in the SRO film. An enhanced photoluminescence (PL) emission (eight-fold more) was observed in MLA as compared to MLB due to the presence of the Si-NPs. Therefore, the influence of graded silicon content in SRN/SRO multilayer structures on the formation of Si-NPs and Si-ncs, and their relation to the PL emission, was analyzed.

1. Introduction

Over the last several decades, silicon nanocrystals (Si-ncs) have been the subject of intensive study due to their potential applications as a strong light source [1,2,3,4]. Si-ncs embedded in dielectric matrices exhibit high luminescence and offer compatibility with Si-based technologies. Nevertheless, the development of this kind of device requires the control of the Si-ncs’ size to improve the charge injection [5,6]. Si-ncs are mostly obtained in single layers of Si-rich dielectric materials [7,8]. However, a broad Si-nc size distribution was obtained in these single layers. It is possible to control the size and density of Si-nc by employing a technique that allows the deposition of multilayer (ML) structures of Si-rich dielectric materials [9,10]. This ML approach makes it possible to engineer the bandgap energy of Si-ncs by optimizing the layer thickness and the composition (x, y or z < 2) of the SiOx/SiOy/SiOz layers that form the ML structure. In fact, photovoltaic properties of Si-ncs have been obtained in a graded-bandgap ML structure where the size of the Si-ncs increases from the middle of the active region towards the electrodes [11]. This approach results in a decrease in the effective injection barrier at the electrodes and a concurrent increase in the charge carrier injection due to the presence of higher-efficiency small Si-ncs in the center of the active layer. Among the Si-rich dielectric materials, silicon-rich oxide (SRO) is one of the most studied. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies (XPS) have shown that SRO is a multiphase material composed of a mixture of silicon dioxide (SiO2), off-stoichiometric silicon oxide (SiOx, x < 2) and elemental silicon, as stablished by the random bonding model [12,13]. It is well known that excess Si in the SRO layers agglomerates after a thermal annealing at high temperature, creating amorphous or crystalline Si nanoparticles (Si-nps) [14]. SRO layers are deposited by a large variety of techniques including: ion implantation of Si into SiO2 [15,16], magnetron sputtering of Si and SiO2 [17,18], laser ablation of Si targets [19], thermal evaporation of SiO [20,21], plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) [22,23] and low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) [24]. In LPCVD, silane (SiH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) are used as reactive gases and the excess Si concentration is controlled by varying the ratio of the partial pressures produced by its fluxes, defined as RO in Equation (1):
RO = P(N2O)/P(SiH4)
The excess Si content deposited into the SRO layers by LPCVD can be varied from 4 to 12.4 at.% for RO values of 30 to 10, respectively [25]. Comparative studies focused on the photoluminescent (PL) properties of SRO layers deposited via different techniques have shown LPCVD as the technique that allows the strongest PL [26,27]. In addition, previous studies revealed that SRO-LPCVD layers with 5.5 at.% excess Si content, thermally annealed at 1100 °C for 180 min, emit the strongest PL [26]. The development of light sources based on SRO was shown to be possible through the use of metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) structures [28]. However, the electroluminescence (EL) response of such devices is usually inefficient due to the high electric field applied to obtain the carriers that tunnel through the oxide [29]. It has been shown that the presence of Si nanopyramids (Si-NPs) at the SiOx/Si-substrate interface improves the injection of charge carriers in indium tin oxide (ITO)/SiOx/Si-nanopyramid/p-Si/Al MOS devices emitting at lower voltages compared to those devices without the Si-NPs, as reported by Lin et al. [30]. The presence of interfacial Si-NPs produces specific zones of roughness at the SiOx/Si interface, which enhances the charge injection towards the Si-ncs through the Fowler–Nordheim (F-N) tunneling mechanism. They also make it possible to effectively extend the device lifetime by reducing the electric field away from the dielectric breakdown [31]. However, the voltages required to obtain the EL in those Si-NPs-based devices are still high, at about 65 V. The combination of Si-NPs and Si-ncs with gradual increases in the mean size can improve the charge injection to the luminescent centers through the use of an ML structure with SRO layers that have different Si concentrations.
Si-ncs and Si-NPs on the surface of Si-substrate can be obtained through the use of SRO layers with a specific amount of excess Si deposited by LPCVD and a subsequent thermal annealing [32]. Since the formation of the Si-NPs on Si substrates is very sensitive to the amount of excess Si in the SRO, there is a significant need to study the influence of Si concentrations on the size and density of Si-NPs and their PL responses. On other hand, silicon-rich nitride (SRN) is transparent to visible light and it has a band gap that is smaller than that of SiO2, facilitating the carrier injections needed for optoelectronic applications [33,34]. In MOS capacitors, Si nitride is used as buffer layer between the dielectric layer and the metal electrode to increase the efficiency and lifetime of the device [35]. Therefore, in this work, we studied the influence of graded silicon content in SRN/SRO multilayer structures on the formation of Si-NPs and Si-ncs and their relation to PL emission.

2. Materials and Methods

For this study, two different SRO ML structures were deposited on p-type silicon substrates ((100)-oriented) with resistivity values of 5–10 Ω-cm. The deposition was carried out by LPCVD using SiH4 and N2O as the reactive gases for the SRO films, and the partial pressure ratio (RO = PN2O/PSiH4) was varied from 10 to 30 to change the excess Si in the ML structure. The ML structures consisted of 5 SRO layers capped by an SRN layer. The first ML structure (MLA) was fabricated by depositing layers of SRO10 (~10 nm), SRO20 (~20 nm), SRO30 (~20 nm), SRO20 (~20 nm) and SRO10 (~10 nm) over the Si substrate (RO = 10/20/30/20/10/Si-substrate), where the sub-index in SRO indicates the RO value. The second ML structure (MLB) was formed by SRO30 (~10 nm), SRO20 (~20 nm), SRO10 (~20 nm), SRO20 (~20 nm) and SRO30 (~10 nm) over the Si substrate (RO = 30/20/10/20/30/Si-substrate). An SRN layer with RN = 70 was deposited using SiH4 and NH3 (RN = PNH3/PSiH4) as reactive gases. All layers were deposited at 750 °C. After deposition, the MLs were thermally annealed at 1100 °C for 180 min in ambient N2 to induce the Si agglomeration within the different SRO layers. The composition of the depth profile of thermally annealed MLs was analyzed by XPS using the Escalab 250Xi equipment (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) produced by Thermo Scientific, with an Al Kα monochromatic source. The cross section high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and scanning TEM (STEM) images were obtained from ML structures using a JEOL JEM 2200 electronic microscope (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The PL spectra were obtained with a Horiba Jovin Yvon Fluoromax spectrometer (Horiba Ltd., Kioto, Japan) and were controlled by a computer. The samples were excited using a 300 nm (4.1 eV) wavelength and the PL measurements were scanned from 400 to 1000 nm with a resolution of 1 nm.

3. Results

3.1. Composition

The chemical compositions of the ML structures were studied using the XPS technique. The Si2p, O1s and N1s signals were obtained in XPS depth profiles by gradually etching the SRN/SRO ML structure to record the corresponding signals at different depths until the Si-substrate was reached. Figure 1a,b show the compositions of the depth-profiles of the MLA and MLB, respectively, where each SRO layer can be distinguished according to the Si content. For MLA, RO = 10/20/30/20/10, the excess Si measured in each SRO layer was about 10.7 ± 0.6, 9.1 ± 0.4, 8.0 ± 0.2, 9.1 ± 0.3 and 9.7 ± 0.4 at.%, respectively. For MLB, RO = 30/20/10/20/30, the excess Si was about 8.3 ± 0.2, 10.8 ± 0.4, 13.6 ± 1.2, 9.8 ± 0.4 and 8.7 ± 0.1 at.%, respectively. As observed in Figure 1a, for the MLA, the silicon content presented a gradual increase from the central layer (SRO30) towards the outer layers, while for MLB the opposite case occurred (Figure 1b). Abrupt changes in the Si and O profiles were not observed between SRO layers within the ML structure. This effect has previously been related to the high temperature of annealing (1100 °C), which promotes the diffusion of the Si and O atoms from the SRO layers with higher atomic percentage towards the SRO layers with lower percentages, generating the gradual interfaces. On the other hand, the Si content within the SRN layer for MLA and MLB was approximately 49.1 ± 0.2 and 50.0 ± 0.4 at.%, respectively. It was previously shown that, during the deposition of SRN, O atoms are incorporated into the single SRN films [36]. Moreover, the oxygen content varied with the RN value; the higher the RN value, the higher the O content. A diffusion of N, Si and O atoms towards the SRN/SRO interface was also observed due to the thermal annealing forming an oxynitride layer (SiON) with gradually increasing contents of the different elements. Similar results were reported in the literature for the formation of SiON at the interface of an SRN/SRO bilayer [37].

3.2. Structural Chracterization

The microstructure of the MLs was studied with STEM and HRTEM to observe the presence of Si-ncs formation in the different ML structures. Figure 2a,b shows a micrograph of the cross-section of the MLA and MLB, respectively, where each of the SRO layers is labeled with its RO value. The mean thickness of each SRO layer was obtained by means of statistical analysis of various STEM micrographs. The thickness of each SRO layer was less than expected. On the other hand, different dark zones (marked by circles) were observed in the micrographs, indicating the presence of Si-agglomerates within the ML structure, especially for MLB. The Si-NPs area could be clearly observed at the SRO10/Si-substrate (p-Si) interface of MLA (Figure 2a). Si-NPs were not present at the MLB, but Si-ncs were observed in the SRO layers with the highest excess Si (Figure 2b).
To further analyze the formation of Si-ncs and Si-NPs, cross-section micrographs of the SRO/Si-substrate interface of the MLA and MLB were obtained by HRTEM, as shown in Figure 3a,b, respectively. For MLA, the formation of Si-NPs on the Si substrate can be observed. The inset of Figure 3a shows an enlarged image of the Si-NPs, which are marked with blue lines. For MLB, a homogeneous SRO/Si-substrate interface was observed, without the formation of Si-NPs, but with the presence of some Si-ncs in the vicinity, indicated with white circles in Figure 3b. Figure 3c,d show the SRO/Si-substrate interfaces of MLA and MLB, respectively, with higher resolutions (2 and 5 nm, respectively). An analysis of the diffraction patterns of Si-ncs and Si-NPs within the MLs is also included. The lattice spacing in the images was estimated using the Digital Micrograph software. Interplanar distances of 0.135 nm, 0.163 nm and 0.192 nm were measured, which corresponded to the (440), (311) and (220) crystalline planes of silicon, respectively. It should be noted that Si-NPs have the same crystalline orientation (220) as that of the Si substrate, as shown in Figure 3c. Further, the Si-NPs have base dimensions of between 8 and 26 nm, heights between 2 and 8 nm, and densities of ~6 × 1011 cm−2. The formation of Si-NPs in single SRO layers with the same excess Si but a longer thickness (580 nm) was previously reported [32]. The authors explained that the formation of Si-NPs could be described by a model of high-temperature diffusion and solid-phase crystallization. Since the SRO layers contain a large amount of excess Si, it diffuses to the surface of the Si substrate, where it agglomerates and crystallizes due to the thermal annealing. The Si-nucleation occurs more easily at the SRO/Si-substrate interface than in the bulk of the SRO due to the large strain at this interface. Then, the nucleation of the excess Si atoms reduce the strain and moves the whole system to a lower energy state. As observed in Figure 3, the formation of Si-NPs was very sensitive to the amount of excess Si in the SRO layer near the Si-substrate. According to the XPS results, in the MLA, the SRO layer next to the Si-substrate had an excess Si of 10.7 ± 0.6 at.%, while, in the MLB, the SRO layer had an excess Si of 8.3 ± 0.2 at.%. Therefore, it is possible that, during the deposition of the SRO10 at the SRO/Si-substrate interface, the Si atoms migrated along the Si-substrate surface quickly enough to orient themselves with the same crystal structure, thus allowing the Si-NPs to grow epitaxially.
By analyzing several HRTEM micrographs of the MLA and MLB, a statistical study of the size of the Si-ncs in the different SRO layers was performed. Figure 4 shows the histograms of Si-ncs’ sizes independently of the SRO layer. As we can see, there was a large distribution in the sizes of Si-ncs from 1 to 4.5 nm and 1.5 to 7 nm for the MLA and MLB, respectively. The presence of Si-ncs with larger sizes in the MLB could have been related to the high excess Si obtained in the central SRO10 layer, which was about 13.6 ± 1.2 at.%. For MLA, the sizes of Si-ncs could be separated into two ranges: (1) between 1 and 3.25 nm, and (2) between 3.25 and 4.5 nm (indicated by the green curves in Figure 4a). For MLB, they could be separated into three ranges: (1) between 1.5 and 2.25 nm, (2) between 2.25 and 3.75 nm, and (3) between 3.75 and 7 nm (indicated by the green curves in Figure 4b). Figure 4c,d show the mean sizes of the Si-ncs and the excess Si for each of the SRO layers. As we can see, an increase in the mean size of Si-ncs was observed as the excess Si within the SRO layer increased. Furthermore, the largest Si-ncs were formed in the middle layer of the MLB (see Figure 4d) where the highest silicon excess (13.7 ± 1.2 at.%) was present. On the other hand, in the MLA, Si-ncs were not formed in the SRO10 layer next to the SRN film, even though it contained a high concentration of excess Si (9.7 ± 0.4 at.%). This effect can be explained by the diffusion of N atoms and the formation of the SiON layer at the SRN/SRO interface. It was reported that N hinders the diffusion of Si atoms and prevents the phase separation in amorphous SiOx:N films [38]. Therefore, if the mobility of Si atoms is reduced, the formation of Si-ncs during thermal annealing is also reduced, resulting in small and non-crystalline Si-nanoparticles. The thickness, excess Si, mean size and density of Si-ncs obtained from XPS and HRTEM micrographs for each of the SRO layer are also summarized in Table 1.

3.3. Photoluminescent Properties

Figure 5a shows the PL spectra of the SRN/SRO MLs, where the PL intensity was normalized to the total thickness of each ML.
It was observed that both MLs presented a broad emission spectrum, which could be divided into two main ranges: one from 370 to 590 nm and the other from 590 to 870 nm. The PL of SRO has been extensively studied for the development of Si-based light-emitting devices. Its origin was mainly related to luminescent centers such as O-based defects, band-to-band transitions in Si-ncs and radiative defects formed at the SRO/Si-ncs interface [4,19,29]. To observe the contributions of the different luminescent centers that were present in the MLs, the PL spectra were deconvoluted, as shown in Figure 5b. Four symmetrical bands centered around 415 (A band), 520 (B band), 730 (C band) and 810 nm (D band) were observed in both MLs. The violet-blue (400–460 nm) and green (520 nm) emission bands (A and B, respectively) were not related to the oxygen defects center (ODC) and the E’δ (Si↑Si≡Si) defects, respectively [28,39]. In addition, it is possible that the SRN film contributed to the PL spectrum since it emits at 540 nm due to electronic transitions from the K0 centers to the =N − centers located near the valence band maximum (VBM), and at 420 nm due to electronic transitions from the K0 centers to the VBM [36,40]. However, the C (730 nm) and D (810 nm) bands were related to band-to-band transitions in Si-ncs due to the quantum confinement effects (QCE) [5], where their emission energy depended on their size. It was previously shown that the emission band can range from the near infrared to the blue by reducing the size of Si-ncs [41]. For the case of Si-ncs embedded in a SiO2 matrix, the energy varies according to the following expression [42]:
Eg(dncs) = Eg0 + [5.83/(dncs)1.78]
where Eg0 is the bulk silicon bandgap in eV, dncs is the Si-ncs diameter in nm and 5.83 is the confinement parameter. The emission energy, as calculated by eq. 2, for the largest Si-ncs of the MLA and MLB (3.5 to 4.5 nm), had values ranging from 1.73 eV (716 nm) to 1.51 eV (821 nm), which corresponded to the C and D bands. On the other hand, the difference in PL emission intensity between the two spectra was found to be quite significant. The MLA showed a stronger PL emission intensity, up to eight-fold, of the C and D emission bands as compared to MLB. The low intensity of PL emission in MLB may have been related to the presence of Si-ncs with sizes larger than 5 nm (see Figure 4d) and to the lower Si-ncs density than MLA. It was previously shown that Si-ncs with sizes larger than 5 nm do not contribute to PL, and also that a larger amount of Pb defects is generated at the interface of these Si-ncs, which are responsible for the quenching of PL emission [43]. On the other hand, the overall increase in the PL emission intensity of the MLA may have been due to the formation of the Si-NPs at the SRO10/Si-substrate interface. To explain this, it is necessary to mention that, in previous studies of LEDs [44,45], the release of the critical emission angle necessary to avoid total internal reflection (TIR), which facilitates a larger fraction of light emitted from the active region of an LED, has also been considered. Versatile methods of surface roughening have been introduced to improve the external quantum efficiency of LEDs. In our case, the roughness introduced by the Si-NPs at the SRO10/Si-substrate interface could avoid the TIR, which facilitated a larger fraction of light being emitted from the SRN/SRO structure to exit to the outside, thus improving the PL emission intensity. It is possible that this same effect will take place by applying an electrical excitation, and thus, it is possible that high electroluminescence will be obtained. Moreover, it is expected that the presence of Si-NPS with nearby Si-ncs will form preferential conduction paths and enhance the injection of charge carriers to the luminescent centers, and thus, reduce the turn-on voltage of the devices. Nevertheless, the electro-optical characterization of these SRN/SRO MLs will be performed in a future study.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we reported the formation of Si-NPs and Si-ncs of different sizes in an SRN/SRO multilayer structure with a gradual silicon excess, as well as their relationship with PL. The formation of Si-NPs only occurred in the SRO/Si-substrate interface when an SRO layer with a high concentration of excess Si was next to the Si-substrate. Si-NPs with the same crystalline orientation as that of the Si-substrate were obtained. The mean size of Si-ncs in the multilayer varied according to the amount of excess Si in the SRO layers, where higher excess Si produced Si-ncs with a larger mean size. A wide distribution of Si-ncs’ sizes was obtained due to the conjunction of the SRO layers. Moreover, the PL emission of these structures was studied. An increase in PL emission (eight-fold more) was observed in the MLA due to the presence of Si-NPs at the SRO/Si-substrate interface as compared to MLB. In addition, a quenching in PL emission was observed for MLB due to the formation of Si-ncs with sizes larger than 5 nm in the middle layer of the SRO. In both MLs, a contribution of the SRN layer in the PL was observed with emission in the violet-blue bands.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.S., S.A.C.T., L.P.H. and J.J.A.B.; methodology, A.M.S., L.P.H., S.A.C.T. and J.J.A.B.; validation, J.J.A.B., L.P.H. and S.A.C.T.; formal analysis, J.J.A.B., L.P.H., K.E.G.F. and A.M.S.; investigation, J.J.A.B., L.P.H. and K.E.G.F.; resources, J.F.M., M.M.M. and A.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J.A.B., S.A.C.T. and L.P.H.; writing—review and editing, J.J.A.B., S.A.C.T., L.P.H., K.E.G.F., J.F.M., M.M.M. and A.M.S.; supervision, A.M.S. and L.P.H.; project administration, A.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Mexico, who provided financial support through the research project # A1-S-8205.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the reported results of this study can be made available from the corresponding author, upon request.

Acknowledgments

J. J. Aviles Bravo acknowledges the support received from CONACYT (PhD scholarship grant No. CVU 852431). The authors acknowledge the help of Victor Aca from INAOE. Gratitude is also expressed to Gerardo Silva, Oscar Solís and Cesar Leyva, of CIMAV, for their help with the the XPS measurements, and FIB and TEM preparation and measurements, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Walters, R.J.; Bourianoff, G.I.; Atwater, H.A. Field-Effect Electroluminescence in Silicon Nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, L.Y.; Chen, W.H.; Hong, F.C.N. Visible Electroluminescence from Silicon Nanocrystals Embedded in Amorphous Silicon Nitride Matrix. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 193506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Pavesi, L.; Dal Negro, L.; Mazzoleni, C.; Franzò, G.; Priolo, F. Optical Gain in Silicon Nanocrystals. Nature 2000, 408, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, G.R.; Lin, C.J.; Lin, C.K.; Chou, L.J.; Chueh, Y.L. Oxygen Defect and Si Nanocrystal Dependent White-Light and near-Infrared Electroluminescence of Si-Implanted and Plasma-Enhanced Chemical-Vapor Deposition-Grown Si-Rich SiO2. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 094306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Wang, X.X.; Zhang, J.G.; Ding, L.; Cheng, B.W.; Ge, W.K.; Yu, J.Z.; Wang, Q.M. Origin and Evolution of Photoluminescence from Si Nanocrystals Embedded in a SiO2 Matrix. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 72, 195313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhou, Z.; Brus, L.; Friesner, R. Electronic Structure and Luminescence of 1.1- and 1.4-Nm Silicon Nanocrystals: Oxide Shell versus Hydrogen Passivation. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sarkar, A.; Bar, R.; Singh, S.; Chowdhury, R.K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Das, A.K.; Ray, S.K. Size-Tunable Electroluminescence Characteristics of Quantum Confined Si Nanocrystals Embedded in Si-Rich Oxide Matrix. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 231105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheng, C.H.; Wu, C.L.; Chen, C.C.; Tsai, L.H.; Lin, Y.H.; Lin, G.R. Si-Rich SixC1-x Light-Emitting Diodes with Buried Si Quantum Dots. IEEE Photonics J. 2012, 4, 1761–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Anopchenko, A.; Marconi, A.; Moser, E.; Prezioso, S.; Wang, M.; Pavesi, L.; Pucker, G.; Bellutti, P. Low-Voltage Onset of Electroluminescence in Nanocrystalline- Si/ SiO2 Multilayers. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 033104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marconi, A.; Anopchenko, A.; Wang, M.; Pucker, G.; Bellutti, P.; Pavesi, L. High Power Efficiency in Si-Nc/SiO2multilayer Light Emitting Devices by Bipolar Direct Tunneling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 221110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shin, D.Y.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, K.J. Graded-Size Si-Nanocrystal-Multilayer Solar Cells. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 104304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mehonic, A.; Buckwell, M.; Montesi, L.; Garnett, L.; Hudziak, S.; Fearn, S.; Chater, R.; McPhail, D.; Kenyon, A.J. Structural Changes and Conductance Thresholds in Metal-Free Intrinsic SiOx Resistive Random Access Memory. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 124505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. González-Flores, K.E.; Palacios-Márquez, B.; Alvarez-Quintana, J.; Pérez-Garcia, S.A.; Licea-Jiménez, L.; Horley, P.; Morales-Sánchez, A. Resistive Switching Control for Conductive Si-Nanocrystals Embedded in Si/SiO2 Multilayers. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 395203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Podhorodecki, A.; Zatryb, G.; Misiewicz, J.; Wojcik, J.; Mascher, P. Influence of the Annealing Temperature and Silicon Concentration on the Absorption and Emission Properties of Si Nanocrystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 043104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Koch, F.; Petrova-Koch, V. Light from Si-Nanoparticle Systems—A Comprehensive View. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1996, 198–200, 840–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kohno, K.; Osaka, Y.; Toyomura, F.; Katayama, H. Photoluminescence of Si Microcrystals Embedded in SiO2 Glass Films. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 33, 661–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kanzawa, Y.; Kageyama, T.; Takeoka, S.; Fujii, M.; Hayashi, S.; Yamamoto, K. Size-Dependent near-Infrared Photoluminescence Spectra of Si Nanocrystals Embedded in SiO2 Matrices. Solid State Commun. 1997, 102, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patrone, L.; Nelson, D.; Safarov, V.I.; Sentis, M.; Marine, W.; Giorgio, S. Photoluminescence of Silicon Nanoclusters with Reduced Size Dispersion Produced by Laser Ablation. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87, 3829–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sachenko, A.V.; Kaganovich, É.B.; Manoǐlov, É.G.; Svechnikov, S.V. Kinetics of Exciton Photoluminescence in Low-Dimensional Silicon Structures. Semiconductors 2001, 35, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kahler, U.; Hofmeister, H. Silicon Nanocrystallites in Buried SiOx Layers via Direct Wafer Bonding. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 641–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rinnert, H.; Vergnat, M.; Marchal, G.; Burneau, A. Strong Visible Photoluminescence in Amorphous SiOx and SiOx: H Thin Films Prepared by Thermal Evaporation of SiO Powder. J. Lumin. 1998, 80, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, G.R.; Lin, C.J.; Lin, C.T. Low-Plasma and High-Temperature PECVD Grown Silicon-Rich SiOx Film with Enhanced Carrier Tunneling and Light Emission. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hsiao, C.Y.; Shih, C.F.; Chen, S.H.; Jiang, W.T. Comparison of Silicon Nanocrystals Embedded Silicon Oxide Films by Sputtering and PECVD. Thin Solid Film. 2011, 519, 5086–5089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alarcón-Salazar, J.; Zaldívar-Huerta, I.E.; Aceves-Mijares, M. Electrical and Electroluminescent Characterization of Nanometric Multilayers of SiOX/SiOY Obtained by LPCVD Including Non-Normal Emission. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 215101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Dong, D.; Irene, E.A.; Young, D.R. Preparation and Some Properties of Chemically Vapor-Deposited Si-Rich SiO2 and Si3N4, Films. J. Electrochem. Soc. SOLID-STATE Sci. Technol. 1977, 125, 819–823. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morales, A.; Barreto, J.; Domínguez, C.; Riera, M.; Aceves, M.; Carrillo, J. Comparative Study between Silicon-Rich Oxide Films Obtained by LPCVD and PECVD. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2007, 38, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perálvarez, M.; Barreto, J.; Carreras, J.; Morales, A.; Navarro-Urrios, D.; Lebour, Y.; Domínguez, C.; Garrido, B. Si-Nanocrystal-Based LEDs Fabricated by Ion Implantation and Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 405201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lai, B.H.; Cheng, C.H.; Lin, G.R. Multicolor ITO/SiOx/p-Si/Al Light Emitting Diodes with Improved Emission Efficiency by Small Si Quantum Dots. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2011, 47, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, K.; Ma, Z.; Huang, X.; Xu, J.; Li, W.; Sui, Y.; Mei, J.; Zhu, D. Comparison between Light Emission from Si/SiNX and Si/SiO 2 Multilayers: Role of Interface States. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2004, 338, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, G.R.; Lin, C.K.; Chou, L.J.; Chueh, Y.L. Synthesis of Si Nanopyramids at SiOx/Si Interface for Enhancing Electroluminescence of Si-Rich SiOx. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 093126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, G.-R.; Lin, C.-J.; Lin, C.-K. Enhanced Fowler-Nordheim Tunneling Effect in Nanocrystallite Si Based LED with Interfacial Si Nano-Pyramids. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Yu, Z.; Aceves-Mijares, M.; Luna-López, A.; Du, J.; Bian, D. Formation of Silicon Nanoislands on Crystalline Silicon Substrates by Thermal Annealing of Silicon Rich Oxide Deposited by Low Pressure Chemical Vapour Deposition. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 4962–4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, X.; Huang, R.; Song, C.; Guo, Y.; Song, J. Effect of Barrier Layers on Electroluminescence from Si/SiOxNy Multilayer Structures. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 214907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lin, G.R.; Pai, Y.H.; Lin, C.T.; Chen, C.C. Comparison on the Electroluminescence of Si-Rich SiNx and SiOx Based Light-Emitting Diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perálvarez, M.; Carreras, J.; Barreto, J.; Morales, A.; Domínguez, C.; Garrido, B. Efficiency and Reliability Enhancement of Silicon Nanocrystal Field-Effect Luminescence from Nitride-Oxide Gate Stacks. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Cabañas-Tay, S.A.; Palacios-Huerta, L.; Luna-López, J.A.; Aceves-Mijares, M.; Alcántara-Iniesta, S.; Pérez-García, S.A.; Morales-Sánchez, A. Analysis of the Luminescent Centers in Silicon Rich Silicon Nitride Light-Emitting Capacitors. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2015, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cabañas-Tay, S.A.; Palacios-Huerta, L.; Aceves-Mijares, M.; Coyopol, A.; Morales-Morales, F.; Pérez-García, S.A.; Licea-Jiménez, L.; Domínguez-Horna, C.; Monfil-Leyva, K.; Morales-Sánchez, A. Study of Narrow and Intense UV Electroluminescence from ITO/SRO/Si-p and ITO/SRN/SRO/Si-p Based Light Emitting Capacitors. J. Lumin. 2017, 183, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Augustine, B.H.; Irene, E.A.; He, Y.J.; Price, K.J.; McNeil, L.E.; Christensen, K.N.; Maher, D.M. Visible Light Emission from Thin Films Containing Si, O, N, and H. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 78, 4020–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rodríguez, J.A.; Vásquez-Agustín, M.A.; Morales-Sánchez, A.; Aceves-Mijares, M. Emission Mechanisms of Si Nanocrystals and Defects in SiO2 Materials. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Robertson, J.; Powell, M.J. Gap States in Silicon Nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1984, 44, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Barbagiovanni, E.G.; Lockwood, D.J.; Rowell, N.L.; Costa Filho, R.N.; Berbezier, I.; Amiard, G.; Favre, L.; Ronda, A.; Faustini, M.; Grosso, D. Role of Quantum Confinement in Luminescence Efficiency of Group IV Nanostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 044311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wu, C.L.; Lin, G.R. Power Gain Modeling of Si Quantum Dots Embedded in a SiOx Waveguide Amplifier with Inhomogeneous Broadened Spontaneous Emission. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2013, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jivanescu, M.; Hiller, D.; Zacharias, M.; Stesmans, A. Size Dependence of Pb-Type Photoluminescence Quenching Defects at the Si Nanocrystal Interface. EPL 2011, 96, 27003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hsu, Y.P.; Chang, S.J.; Su, Y.K.; Chen, S.C.; Tsai, J.M.; Lai, W.C.; Kuo, C.H.; Chang, C.S. InGaN-GaN MQW LEDs with Si Treatment. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2005, 17, 1620–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, C.L.; Lee, S.C.; Lee, W.I. Nonlithographic Random Masking and Regrowth of GaN Microhillocks to Improve Light-Emitting Diode Efficiency. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, L4–L7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 06582 g001 550
Figure 1. XPS depth profile for Si2p, O1s, N1s signal for (a) MLA and (b) MLB after thermal annealing.
Figure 1. XPS depth profile for Si2p, O1s, N1s signal for (a) MLA and (b) MLB after thermal annealing.
Materials 14 06582 g001
Materials 14 06582 g002 550
Figure 2. STEM cross-section micrograph of the (a) MLA and (b) MLB. The thickness and RO value for each of the layers are indicated.
Figure 2. STEM cross-section micrograph of the (a) MLA and (b) MLB. The thickness and RO value for each of the layers are indicated.
Materials 14 06582 g002
Materials 14 06582 g003 550
Figure 3. Cross-section HRTEM micrographs of the SRO/Si interface for (a) and (c) MLA and (b) and (d) MLB. Inset in (a) shows an enlarged image of the Si-nanopyramids.
Figure 3. Cross-section HRTEM micrographs of the SRO/Si interface for (a) and (c) MLA and (b) and (d) MLB. Inset in (a) shows an enlarged image of the Si-nanopyramids.
Materials 14 06582 g003
Materials 14 06582 g004 550
Figure 4. Histograms of Si-ncs sizes in (a) MLA and (b) MLB and the mean size of the Si-ncs vs. silicon excess of each SRO layer in (c) MLA and (d) MLB. Numbers in (a,b) indicates the Si-ncs size ranges.
Figure 4. Histograms of Si-ncs sizes in (a) MLA and (b) MLB and the mean size of the Si-ncs vs. silicon excess of each SRO layer in (c) MLA and (d) MLB. Numbers in (a,b) indicates the Si-ncs size ranges.
Materials 14 06582 g004
Materials 14 06582 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) PL spectra of MLA and MLB, and (b) deconvolution of the PL peaks for both MLs.
Figure 5. (a) PL spectra of MLA and MLB, and (b) deconvolution of the PL peaks for both MLs.
Materials 14 06582 g005
Table
Table 1. Thickness, excess Si, mean size and density of Si-ncs obtained from XPS and HRTEM micrographs for each of the SRO layers.
Table 1. Thickness, excess Si, mean size and density of Si-ncs obtained from XPS and HRTEM micrographs for each of the SRO layers.
LabelLayer NumberRORNExcess Si (at.%)Thickness (nm)Si-ncs
Mean Size (nm)Density (cm−2)
MLA110--10.7 ± 0.610.16 ± 0.113.95 ± 0.206.79 × 1011
220--9.1 ± 0.418.89 ± 1.252.86 ± 0.819.05 × 1011
330--8.0 ± 0.219.96 ± 0.30----
420--9.1 ± 0.317.24 ± 1.552.87 ± 0.706.26 × 1011
510--9.7 ± 0.49.67 ± 2.21----
6--706.1 ± 0.213.42 ± 3.33----
MLB130--8.3 ± 0.28.15 ± 0.74----
220--10.8 ± 0.417.72 ± 0.932.87 ± 0.731.31 × 1011
310--13.6 ± 1.218.80 ± 0.853.72 ± 1.039.26 × 1011
420--9.8 ± 0.416.79 ± 0.312.89 ± 0.615.85 × 1011
530--8.7 ± 0.18.78 ± 0.56----
6--707.0 ± 0.411.51 ± 2.79----
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Avilés Bravo, J.J.; Cabañas Tay, S.A.; Palacios Huerta, L.; González Flores, K.E.; Flores Méndez, J.; Moreno Moreno, M.; Morales Sánchez, A. Effect of the Graded Silicon Content in SRN/SRO Multilayer Structures on the Si Nanocrystals and Si Nanopyramids Formation and Their Photoluminescence Response. Materials 2021, 14, 6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216582

AMA Style

Avilés Bravo JJ, Cabañas Tay SA, Palacios Huerta L, González Flores KE, Flores Méndez J, Moreno Moreno M, Morales Sánchez A. Effect of the Graded Silicon Content in SRN/SRO Multilayer Structures on the Si Nanocrystals and Si Nanopyramids Formation and Their Photoluminescence Response. Materials. 2021; 14(21):6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Avilés Bravo, José Juan, Santiago Antonio Cabañas Tay, Liliana Palacios Huerta, Karla Esther González Flores, Javier Flores Méndez, Mario Moreno Moreno, and Alfredo Morales Sánchez. 2021. "Effect of the Graded Silicon Content in SRN/SRO Multilayer Structures on the Si Nanocrystals and Si Nanopyramids Formation and Their Photoluminescence Response" Materials 14, no. 21: 6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216582

APA Style

Avilés Bravo, J. J., Cabañas Tay, S. A., Palacios Huerta, L., González Flores, K. E., Flores Méndez, J., Moreno Moreno, M., & Morales Sánchez, A. (2021). Effect of the Graded Silicon Content in SRN/SRO Multilayer Structures on the Si Nanocrystals and Si Nanopyramids Formation and Their Photoluminescence Response. Materials, 14(21), 6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216582

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop