Next Article in Journal
Effects of Vanadium on the Structural and Optical Properties of Borate Glasses Containing Er3+ and Silver Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Consideration of Lamination Structural Analysis in a Multi-Layered Composite and Failure Analysis on Wing Design Application
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 13
10.3390/ma14133708
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improvement of Bond Strength and Durability of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Incorporating High Volume Blast Furnace Slag

by
Shu-Ken Lin
1 and
Chung-Hao Wu
2,*
1
Department of Civil Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, No. 145 Xingda Rd., South District, Taichung City 40224, Taiwan
2
Department of Civil Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, No. 200, Zhongbei Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan City 32023, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(13), 3708; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133708
Submission received: 17 June 2021 / Revised: 30 June 2021 / Accepted: 30 June 2021 / Published: 2 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Sustainability in Buildings: New Trends in the Management of Construction and Demolition Waste)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper aims to experimentally investigate the effects of high volume cement replacement of blast furnace slag (BFS) on the bond, strength and durability of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Concrete mixtures were prepared containing 0%, 15%, 30%, 45%, 60% and 75% BFS with each of recycled aggregate and natural aggregate. Measurements of the compressive and bond strength, the resistance to chloride-ion penetration and the water permeability of concrete are reported. In addition, a microhardness test was also performed to evaluate the quality of interfacial transition zone (ITZ) in concrete. Test results of the bond strength and the compressive strength of RAC mixtures, in spite of the cement replacement amount with BFS, show that the concretes result in reduced strength when compared to natural aggregate concrete (NAC) mixtures, while the strength gains for the BFS-based concrete are higher than that of the reference mixtures without BFS at long-term ages. Incorporating BFS in concrete can inherently improve the durability properties by increasing higher resistance to chloride-ion penetration and lower water permeability. This improvement in the mechanical and durability properties of the BFS-based RAC mixture may be due to the additional pozzolanic reaction of BFS, which enhances the properties of ITZ in concrete, resulting in an improvement of the strength of concrete.

1. Introduction

Cement and aggregate are the two main components in concrete. However, the procedures of their production emit much CO2 and consume a large amount of energy, which is unfriendly to the natural environment. In the past decades, many researchers intended to find an effective method for producing sustainable concrete with a low amount of cement or recycled aggregate. The general measure is to crush waste concrete as coarse aggregate for producing concrete, which was regarded as recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) [1,2,3]. The surface of recycled coarse aggregate is generally full of pores, presenting high water absorption, which affects the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) property in concrete, leading to negative effects for the durability of concrete [4,5,6,7]. In order to improve the durability of the RAC, pozzolans such as fly ash and blast furnace slag were added to concrete; nevertheless, there are restrictions on the dosages of the pozzolans in many national standard codes [8,9,10].
For past decades, increasingly more research results of concrete with high volumes blast furnace slag (BFS) were reported, with most discussing natural aggregate concrete [11,12,13,14,15], while few dealt with RAC incorporating high replacement levels of BFS, especially on the durability aspect. Djelloul [16] investigated the improvement of workability of self-compacting concrete (SCC) mixes containing recycled aggregates with increasing BFS from 0 to 30%. They found that recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) content of 25% to 50% natural aggregate replacement and cement replacement of 15% BFS may be the best dosage to produce available SCC without any segregation or bleeding. El-Hawary [17] reported the results of experimental research on the durability and performance of various mixtures of RAC incorporating 25% BFS as cement replacement. The test results reported that incorporating mineral slag improved the mechanical properties and durability characteristics of the RACs. Addition of 25% BFS evaluated to be efficient in reducing water absorption, alkali–silica reactivity and sulfate attack in RAC. However, the experimental results also presented that introduction of 25% BFS is not effective enough to prohibit the excessive expansion of the alkali–carbonate reaction in RAC after one year. Furthermore, it has an adverse impact on resisting the drying shrinkage and water permeability of the RAC mixtures.
Hence, some studies further investigated the effect of high volume blast furnace slag. Khodair [18] examined the effect of recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) on the properties of SCC. Twenty RAC mixtures with different replacement ratio of RCA, BFS and fly ash (FA) were prepared and tested. The test results showed that the replacement ratio of recycled aggregate increased, the compressive strengths of concrete decreased at 3, 14, and 28 days. Moreover, the partial replacement of cement by pozzolans presented an adverse effect on the 28-day RAC compressive strength; however, it increased the resistance to chloride permeability.
Majhi [19] researched the effects of RCA and BFS on fresh and hardened concrete properties; 16 concrete mixtures were prepared with 0–100% replacement of natural aggregate by RCA for each 0–60% replacement of cement by BFS. The test results showed that the workability decreased with the use of RCA. The compressive, flexural and split tensile strength decreased with the increase in the replacement ratio of RCA or BFS or both. Voids and water absorption in the concrete mixtures increased with the increase of RCA content. However, the use of BFS enhanced the quality of the concrete by improving the interfacial transition zone and the bond strength between mortar and aggregate. The concrete mixture with 50% RCA and 40% BFS achieved properties similar to those of the natural aggregate concrete without BFS.
In addition, the bond strength of recycled aggregate concrete is also an interesting issue. Some studies discussed the bond strength between RAC and rebar in comparison with that of ordinary concrete [20,21]. Their test results indicated that the reduction of bond strength could be associated with the increment of recycled aggregate used in the mixture, which presented reductions of 6–8% up to 30% of bond strength. In order to improve the bond strength of RAC, some researchers added pozzolan into concrete to enhance the bond strength. Majhi [22] investigated concrete mixes containing 0%, 40% and 60% BFS with each of 50% and 100% RCA. The test results showed that the compressive strength of RAC can satisfy the 28-day compressive strength requirements of the concrete grades of M15, M20 and M25, as per IS 10262 (2009) [23]. Majhi [24] also investigated the mechanical properties and durability of RAC utilizing high volume BFS (up to 60% replacement ratio of cement) with lime activator. The results revealed that the enhancement in the mechanical properties of blast furnace slag-based RAC mixes were found to be in the range of 14.02–19.61%, 10.74–14.71%, 9.33–14.07% and 6.65–14.17% for compressive, flexural and bond, and splitting tensile strength, respectively.
Furthermore, other studies focused on discussing the microstructure at steel–concrete interface in reinforced concrete. Soylev [25] studied the influence of steel–concrete interface defects on reinforcing steel corrosion. Their test results showed that the defects related to the gaps caused by segregation, bleeding and settlement of fresh concrete under horizontal reinforcing bars (RB). These defects increased with the concrete depth below the horizontal RB and depended on the bleeding capacity of the concrete mixture. Horne [26] reported that compared with the bulk cement paste, the aggregate–cement-paste and RB–cement-paste interfaces presented more porosity and calcium hydroxide (CH) and less unreacted cement. As the hydration age increased, the porosity near the interfaces decreased, and the CH increased with more CH close to the RB than to the aggregate. Chen [27] indicated that there was a relatively wide porous band with large voids and pores near the RB–concrete interface. They also found that size of porous band around the RB is not uniform, and that the water to cement ratio can significantly affect the distribution and size of porous band at the interface.
The abovementioned research suggests that RAC with high replacement levels of BFS may present improved durability and mechanical properties at later age. This study aims to further investigate the fresh properties, mechanical properties and durability of RAC that incorporates high replacement levels of BFS. The mechanical properties of hardened concrete were evaluated by testing the interfacial transition zone performance at the surface of aggregate and steel bars, which were measured using microhardness tests [28,29].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

(1)
Cement: Type I Portland cement obtained by Taiwan Cement Corporation Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan, with a specific gravity of 3.15. The basic properties of cement are shown in Table 1.
(2)
Blast furnace slag (BFS): Grade 120 of ground granulated blast furnace slag obtained from Advanced-Tek Systems Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan. The basic properties of BFS are shown in Table 1.
(3)
Fine Aggregate (FA): Natural river sand with a specific gravity of 2.60 and fineness modulus of 2.40.
(4)
Coarse aggregate (CA): Crushed river stone with a specific gravity of 2.61, bulk density of 1470 kg/m3 and maximum size of 19 mm.
(5)
Recycled coarse aggregate (RCA): Crushed waste concrete with a specific gravity of 2.26, bulk density of 1280 kg/m3 and particle sizes of 5~20 mm.
(6)
Superplasticizer (SP): High performance water-reducing agent obtained from HI CON Chemical Admixture Taiwan Ltd., Taipei, which meets the CNS 12283 Type G with a specific gravity of 1.2 ± 0.02 and pH 7.0 ± 1.0.

2.2. Mixture Proportion and Specimen Preparation

The mixture proportions of concrete were designed according to ACI 211.1 [30], basically, for providing the compressive strength of natural aggregate concrete (NAC) of 41 MPa at 28 days. The water to cementitious material ratio (w/cm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.50, and the BFS content ranged from 0% to 75% by weight of the total cementitious materials as cement replacement. The proportions of a dozen kinds of mixtures are shown in Table 2.
The fresh properties of concrete, including slump, air content and unit weight, were simultaneously measured for each batch. Specimens for testing were cast from each mixture: a cylinder specimen of φ100 mm × 200 mm for compressive strength test, cylinder specimen of φ150 mm × 50 mm for water permeability test and cylinder specimen of φ100 mm × 50 mm for chloride-ion permeability test. For the bond strength test, cubes of 150 mm size were prepared by embedding a reinforcing bar of #7 (nominal diameter 22.2 mm) vertically along the central axis of the specimen. A cube specimen of 50 mm × 50 mm × 50 mm in dimension with a #4 (nominal diameter 12.7 mm) bar placed horizontally in the middle was prepared for the microhardness test. Figure 1 shows the cut section of specimen for testing. After removal from the molds, all specimens were moved to a standard moist-curing room until date for testing.

2.3. Test Procedures

The compressive strength test was performed according to ASTM C 39 [31] at the ages of 7, 28, 56 and 91 days. Steel pull-out testing (ASTM C234 [32]) for bond strength determination was carried out at 7, 28, 56 and 91 days. The resistance of concrete to the penetration of chloride ion was measured using rapid chloride-ion permeability test (RCPT, ASTM C1202-12 [33]), in terms of the charge passed through the concrete in coulombs. The water permeability of concrete (IS 3085 [34]) was tested using a water permeability apparatus subjected to a water pressure of 0.29 MPa for 3 h to determine the flow through the specimen. The chloride-ion penetration and water permeability tests were carried out at 28, 56 and 91 days. Vickers hardness test was performed according to ASTM E384-17 [35] for recognizing the existence and properties of ITZ. The Vickers microhardness HV (MPa) is calculated as:
HV = P As = 2 P sin ( α 2 ) d 2 = 1.8544 P d 2
where As = surface area of indentation (mm2), P = load (N), α = face of angle of indenter at 136° and d = mean diagonal of indentation (mm). Generally, the hardness is correlated with the strength of material tested.

3. Experimental Results and Discussion

3.1. Fresh Properties of Concrete

The measured fresh properties of concrete including slump, air content and unit weight are shown in Table 3. It shows that the concrete mixtures were mixed with superplasticizer to produce a workable slump in the range of 210 to 250 mm. The air content of concrete ranged from 1.2% to 3.4% for natural aggregate concretes and 1.8% to 4.8% for RACs, respectively, basically increased with the increase of the cement replacement ratio of BFS. The unit weight of concrete ranged from 2215 kg/m3 to 2314 kg/m3 decreased as the replacement ratio of BFS increased. These results indicate that the RAC mixtures prepared for test can exhibit adequate properties of fresh concrete.

3.2. Mechanical Properties of Concrete

3.2.1. Compressive Strength

The compressive strength of concretes measured at various ages is shown in Table 4; Figure 2 shows the development of compressive strength for each concrete mixture. It is seen that the strength development with age of the NAC and RAC mixtures present a similar trend, in which the compressive strength values of RAC series were all lower than that of the corresponding mixtures of NAC series. This indicates that despite the cement replacing amount with BFS, the mixtures of RAC result in reduced strength compared to that of the NAC.
It can be seen in Figure 2 that the curve slope of the BFS mixtures tends to be steeper than that of the reference mixture without BFS at later age. In other words, the strength gain for the BFS mixtures is higher than that of the reference mixture without BFS. This improvement in the long-term compressive strength may be the consequence of the pozzolanic reaction of BFS, leading to enhance the strength.

3.2.2. Properties of ITZ in Concrete

Microhardness testing has been reported to be a means for characterizing the bulk paste properties in cement pastes, especially for the properties of interfacial transition zone (ITZ). The ITZ was recognized as a significant part of the microstructural system in concrete, which plays an important role in affecting the properties of concrete, such as compressive strength, tensile strength, fracture and permeability.
Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively, illustrate the microhardness profiles of measured results for NACs and RACs. All curves show that in the vicinity of the rebar surface there is a gradient in microhardness, but in the outer bulk paste it tends to be constant. The width of the zone, with a varied gradient, may be referred to as ITZ. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show that both NAC and RAC mixtures at all ages present a similar curve shape of ITZ. The distinction from each other of any two ITZ curves displays solely in the form of depression; deeper depression represents a lower microhardness value. Both RAC and NAC mixtures incorporated with various BFS content show higher microhardness at ITZ than that of the correlated control mixture without BFS. Furthermore, for each age, concrete containing more BFS presents higher microhardness at ITZ; the concrete mixture with 75% BFS achieves the highest microhardness. These results indicate that incorporating BFS makes the ITZ in concrete denser and stronger, especially at long-term ages. This may infer to be due to the latent hydraulic activity and the additional pozzolanic reaction of BFS, which enhance the properties of ITZ and in turn the strength of BFS concrete.

3.2.3. Bond Strength

The bond strength of concrete obtained from the pull-out test was calculated as:
μ a v g = P π ⋅ d b ⋅ L e
where μavg is the average bond stress (MPa), P is the measured maximum load (N), db is the diameter of rebar (mm) and Le is the length of embedment (mm).
Table 5 summarizes the results of the pull-out test measured at the ages of 7, 28, 56 and 91 days. It is seen that the average bond stress μavg (also named bond strength) of concrete increased with the increase of compressive strength. The bond strength of BFS concretes was higher than that of the reference concrete without BFS, which increases with the increase in BFS-based content. This increase in bond strength of BFS concrete may be due to the denser and stronger ITZ at the surface of steel bars, as discussed earlier.
To evaluate the long-term effect of BFS on the bond strength of concrete, the bond strength gains (in percentage) of each mixture series at 28, 56 and 91 days with respect to the 7-day bond strength are also calculated, as shown in Table 5. Their bond strength development with age of NAC and RAC mixtures are illustrated in Figure 5 and Figure 6. From Table 5, it is found that the rate of bond strength gains of each BFS concrete for both NAC and RAC mixtures at later ages is higher than that of the reference concrete without BFS. The rate of strength gains at ages of 56 and 91 days increases with the increase in BFS content of the BFS-based RAC. This trend of bond strength can be also observed in Figure 5 and Figure 6, in which the curve slope of the BFS mixtures at long-term ages tend to be steeper than that of the reference concrete without BFS. For instance, the strength gains in bond strength of the mixture RS00 at 28, 56 and 91 days with respect to 7-day strength of the same are 6%, 17% and 28%, respectively, obviously less than the RS45 mixture of 13%, 24% and 37%, and the RS75 mixture of 14%, 27% and 39%, respectively.
Based on these results, the BFS may provide the effects to enhance the long-term bond strength of RAC; the rate of strength gains at later ages beyond 56 days increase with the increase in BFS content. This may be due to the fact that the pozzolanic reaction of BFS can improve the strength properties of ITZ at the surface of steel bars, resulting in an enhancement of the long-term bond strength of the BFS concretes.

3.3. Durability Properties

3.3.1. Resistance to Chloride-Ion Penetration

Table 6 summarizes the measured results of the RCPT test for the resistance of concrete mixture to the chloride-ion penetration; the results are also shown in Figure 7. It is found that for most concrete mixtures of the NAC and RAC series, except the mixtures NS15 and RS15, the resistance to the chloride-ion penetration for each BFS concrete is significantly higher than that of the reference concrete, without BFS at later ages. When BFS is used, the chloride-ion penetration value of concrete decreases with an increase in BFS content (Figure 7) At 91 days, the total charge passed for mixture RS75 was 581 coulombs (C) (classified as very low permeability), far less when compared with 8114 C (high permeability) for the reference mixture RS00. Even at 28 days, the total charge passed for the mixture RS 75 was 938 C (very low permeability). This indicates that incorporating high volume (higher than 45%) of BFS in RAC at later ages may greatly reduce the chloride-ion ingress, and results in obvious improvement of the durability of concrete. This is believed to be due to the contribution of the pozzolanic character of BFS, which enhanced the resistance to chloride attack at long-term ages.

3.3.2. Water Permeability

The water permeability (WP) of concrete was tested using a uniaxial flow apparatus performed on cylinder specimens (φ150 mm × 50 mm) subjected to 0.29 MPa pressure for 3 h. The WP was calculated with following formula:
Water   permeability = m 2 − m 1 m 2 × 100 %
where m1 = initial weight of specimen and m2 = specimen weight after test.
Table 7 summarizes the measured WP of the concrete mixtures. It is seen that WP decreases with increasing compressive strength for both NAC and RAC mixtures. Incorporating BFS in concrete inherently reduces the WP of concrete at all ages. This is particularity found in mixtures NS 75 and RS 75 containing 75% BFS at curing age of 91 days, which has WP of 0.69% and 0.18%, respectively, comparably less with that of the reference mixture NS00 and RS00 of 0.46% and 0.79%, respectively. These results signify the fact that either NAC or RAC containing a high volume BFS at later ages may lead to lower water permeability, namely, superior durability to the concrete without BFS.
Furthermore, the effect on the water permeability of concrete by adding BFS can also be seen from Figure 8, which illustrates the relations between water permeability and BFS content of RAC mixture at curing ages of 28 and 91 days. Note that the WP of concrete decreases with the increase of BFS content for the two curing ages, while the curve trend for the 91-day concrete presents a steeper decline than that for the 28-day concrete, indicating that BFS concrete may exhibit less WP at later ages.

4. Conclusions

Based on the results and findings of the experimental work for concrete with w/cm ratio in the range of 0.30 to 0.50 and with BFS content in the range of 0% to 75% by weight of the total cementitious material as cement replacement, the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • The strength development with age of the NAC and RAC mixtures presents a similar trend, in which the compressive strength of RAC series is lower than that of the corresponding NAC series, indicating that, despite the cement replacing BFS, the mixtures of RAC result in reduced strength. In addition, the strength gain at later ages for the BFS mixtures is higher than that of the reference mixture without BFS.
  • Both of RAC and NAC mixtures incorporated with any BFS content show higher microhardness at ITZ than that of the correlated control mixture without BFS. Concrete at each age and containing more BFS presents higher microhardness at ITZ. This indicates that incorporating BFS makes the ITZ in concrete denser and stronger, especially at later ages.
  • The bond strength of BFS concretes is higher than that for the reference concrete without BFS, which increases with the increase in BFS content. The rate of bond strength gains at long-term ages with respect to the 7-day strength increases with the increase in BFS content. This may be due to pozzolanic reaction of BFS, which enhances the strength properties of ITZ at the surface of steel bars, resulting in an improvement of the long-term bond strength of BFS concretes.
  • Both RAC and NAC mixtures containing BFS present higher resistance to chloride ingress than that of the reference concrete without BFS, at all ages. The chloride-ion penetration value of the BFS-based concrete decreases with the increase in BFS content. Eventually, the mixture RS 75 comprising recycled aggregate and 75% BFS exhibits a pronounced resistance to chloride attack, revealing a chloride-ion penetration value of less than 1000 coulombs (very low permeability) at later ages.
  • Incorporating BFS in concrete can inherently reduce the water permeability of concrete at all ages. Either RAC or NAC containing high volume BFS (>45%) at later ages may lead to lower water permeability, namely, superior durability to the concrete with BFS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-K.L. and C.-H.W.; methodology, S.-K.L. and C.-H.W.; validation, S.-K.L. and C.-H.W.; formal analysis, S.-K.L. and C.-H.W.; investigation, S.-K.L.; data curation, S.-K.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-H.W.; writing—review and editing, C.-H.W.; supervision, C.-H.W.; project administration, S.-K.L. and C.-H.W. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yaragal, S.C.; Teja, D.C.; Shaffi, M. Performance studies on concrete with recycled coarse aggregates. Adv. Concr. Constr. 2016, 4, 263–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mao, Y.A.; Liu, J.H.; Shi, C.J. Autogenous shrinkage and drying shrinkage of recycled aggregate concrete: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nedeljković, M.; Visser, J.; Šavija, B.; Valcke, S.; Schlangen, E. Use of fine recycled concrete aggregates in concrete: A critical review. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 38, 102196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, K.H.; Chung, H.S.; Ashour, A.F. Influence of type and replacement level of recycled aggregates on concrete properties. ACI Mater. J. 2008, 105, 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  5. Limbachiya, M.C.; Leelawar, T.; Dhir, R.K. Use of recycled concrete aggregate in high-strength concrete. Mater. Struct. Vol. 2000, 33, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parekh, D.N.; Modhera, C.D. Assessment of recycled aggregate concrete. J. Eng. Res. Stud. 2011, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gonza’lez-Fonteboa, B.; Martı´nez-Abella, F.; Eiras-Lo’pez, J.; Seara-Paz, S. Effect of recycled coarse aggregate on damage of recycled concrete. Mater. Struct. Vol. 2011, 44, 1759–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. ACI 232.2R, Report on the Use of Fly Ash in Concrete; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2018.
  9. ASTM C989, Standard Specification for Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag for Use in Concrete and Mortars; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2005.
  10. CNS 12549, Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag for Use in Concrete and Mortars; Chinese National Standards: Taipei, Taiwan, 2009.
  11. Ashish, D.K.; Singh, B.; Verma, S.K. The effect of attack of chloride and sulphate on ground granulated blast furnace slag concrete. Adv. Concr. Constr. 2016, 4, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, D.J.; Kim, C.Y.; Urgessac, G.; Choi, J.H.; Park, C.; Yeon, J.H. Durability and rheological characteristics of high-volume ground-granulated blast-furnace slag concrete containing CaCO3/anhydrate-based alkali activator. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 204, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duraman, S.B.; Richardson, I.G. Microstructure & properties of steel-reinforced concrete incorporating Portland cement and ground granulated blast furnace slag hydrated at 20 °C. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 137, 106193. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee, J.H.; Lee, T.Y. Durability and engineering performance evaluation of CaO content and ratio of binary blended concrete containing ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Nicula, L.M.; Corbu, O.; Iliescu, M. Influence of blast furnace slag on the durability characteristic of road concrete such as freeze-thaw resistance. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 46, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Djelloul, O.K.; Menadi, B.; Wardeh, G.; Kenai, S. Performance of self-compacting concrete made with coarse and fine recycled concrete aggregates and ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Adv. Concr. Constr. 2018, 6, 103–121. [Google Scholar]
  17. El-Hawary, M.; Al-Yaqout, A.; Nouh, K. Durability of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating slag. Waste Resour. Manag. 2019, 172, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khodair, Y.A.; Bommareddy, B. Self-consolidating concrete using recycled concrete aggregate and high volume of fly ash, and slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 153, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Majhi, R.K.; Nayak, A.N.; Mukharjee, B.B. Development of sustainable concrete using recycled coarse aggregate and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 159, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seara-Paz, S.; González-Fonteboa, B.; Eiras-López, J.; Herrador, M.F. Bond behavior between steel reinforcement and recycled concrete. Mater. Struct. 2013, 47, 323–334. [Google Scholar]
  21. Butler, L.; West, J.S.; Tighe, S.L. The effect of recycled concrete aggregate properties on the bond strength between RCA concrete and steel reinforcement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1037–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Majhi, R.K.; Nayak, A.N. Bond, durability and microstructural characteristics of ground granulated blast furnace slag based recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 212, 578–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. IS 10262, Concrete Mix Proportioning–Guidelines; Indian Standard: New Delhi, India, 2009.
  24. Majhi, R.K.; Nayak, A.N. Production of sustainable concrete utilising high-volume blast furnace slag and recycled aggregate with lime activator. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Soylev, T.A.; François, R. Quality of steel-concrete interface and corrosion of reinforcing steel. Cement and Concrete Research 2003, 33, 1407–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Horne, A.T.; Richardson, I.G.; Brydson, R.M.D. Quantitative analysis of the microstructure of interfaces in steel reinforced concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1613–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, F.J.; Li, C.Q.; Baji, H.; Ma, B.G. Quantification of steel-concrete interface in reinforced concrete using Backscattered Electron imaging technique. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 179, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Igarashi, S.B.A.; Bentur, A.; Mindess, S. Microhardness testing of cementation materials. Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 1996, 4, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mindess, S.; Young, J.F.; Darwin, D. Concrete; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003; pp. 78–79. [Google Scholar]
  30. ACI 211.1, Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 1991.
  31. ASTM C39/C39M, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  32. ASTM C234, Standard Test Method for Comparing Concretes on the Basis of the Bond Developed with Reinforcing Steel; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1991.
  33. ASTM C 1202, Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
  34. IS 3085, Method of Test for Permeability of Cement Mortar and Concrete; Indian Standard: New Delhi, India, 1965.
  35. ASTM E384, Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
Materials 14 03708 g001 550
Figure 1. Vickers hardness test section of cube specimen.
Figure 1. Vickers hardness test section of cube specimen.
Materials 14 03708 g001
Materials 14 03708 g002 550
Figure 2. Compressive strength development of concrete.
Figure 2. Compressive strength development of concrete.
Materials 14 03708 g002
Materials 14 03708 g003a 550Materials 14 03708 g003b 550
Figure 3. Measured Vickers hardness of normal aggregate concrete at ages of (a) 28 days, (b) 56 days and (c) 91 days.
Figure 3. Measured Vickers hardness of normal aggregate concrete at ages of (a) 28 days, (b) 56 days and (c) 91 days.
Materials 14 03708 g003aMaterials 14 03708 g003b
Materials 14 03708 g004a 550Materials 14 03708 g004b 550
Figure 4. Measured Vickers hardness of recycled aggregate concrete at ages of (a) 28 days, (b) 56 days and (c) 91 days.
Figure 4. Measured Vickers hardness of recycled aggregate concrete at ages of (a) 28 days, (b) 56 days and (c) 91 days.
Materials 14 03708 g004aMaterials 14 03708 g004b
Materials 14 03708 g005 550
Figure 5. Bond strength of NAC versus curing age.
Figure 5. Bond strength of NAC versus curing age.
Materials 14 03708 g005
Materials 14 03708 g006 550
Figure 6. Bond strength of RAC versus curing age.
Figure 6. Bond strength of RAC versus curing age.
Materials 14 03708 g006
Materials 14 03708 g007 550
Figure 7. Total charge passed vs. BFS content of concrete.
Figure 7. Total charge passed vs. BFS content of concrete.
Materials 14 03708 g007
Materials 14 03708 g008 550
Figure 8. Influence of BFS content on the water permeability of RAC mixtures.
Figure 8. Influence of BFS content on the water permeability of RAC mixtures.
Materials 14 03708 g008
Table
Table 1. Composition and physical properties of cement and blast furnace slag.
Table 1. Composition and physical properties of cement and blast furnace slag.
ComponentsCementBlast Furnace Slag
SiO2 (%)21.438.1
Al2O3 (%)4.97.5
Fe2O3 (%)3.80.3
CaO (%)64.239.9
MgO (%)1.110.6
Na2O (%)0.20.4
SO3 (%)2.10.2
Loss on ignition (%)2.11.4
Specific surface area (m2/kg)336538
Specific gravity3.152.90
Table
Table 2. Proportions of concrete mixtures.
Table 2. Proportions of concrete mixtures.
Mixturew/cmWaterCementBFS bFANCARCASP
kg/m3
NS00 a0.50210420080086001.1
NS150.461933576383986001.0
NS300.4217629412687886001.8
NS450.3816023118991886002.6
NS600.3414316825295686003.6
NS750.3012610531599586006.3
RS000.50210420079307501.1
RS150.461933576383207501.5
RS300.4217629412687107502.3
RS450.3816023118991007503.6
RS600.3414316825295007505.9
RS750.3012610531598907508.7
Note: a N is normal aggregate concrete, R is recycled aggregate concrete; the number following the symbol S represents the percentage of cement replacement by BFS. b BFS: blast furnace slag, FA: fly ash, NCA: natural coarse aggregate concrete, RCA: recycled coarse aggregate, SP: superplasticizer.
Table
Table 3. Properties of fresh concretes.
Table 3. Properties of fresh concretes.
MixtureSlump (mm)Unit Weight (kg/m3)Air Content (%)
NS0022523142.1
NS1521023031.2
NS3022022891.4
NS4521022852.3
NS6025022673.2
NS7525022363.4
RS0021522842.0
RS1522022731.8
RS3025022612.2
RS4523522383.1
RS6023022314.1
RS7520022154.8
Table
Table 4. Compressive strengths of concretes (MPa).
Table 4. Compressive strengths of concretes (MPa).
Mixturew/cmCompressive Strength (MPa)
7 Days28 Days56 Days91 Days
NS000.5039.2 (100%)42.1 (107%)47.8 (122%)56.3 (130%)
NS150.4647.9 (100%)55.4 (115%)61.3 (128%)64.2 (134%)
NS300.4252.8 (100%)62.9 (119%)68.1 (129%)71.3 (135%)
NS450.3859.5 (100%)65.6 (110%)72.9 (123%)78.8 (133%)
NS600.3462.1 (100%)72.3 (116%)77.5 (125%)82.4 (133%)
NS750.3065.2 (100%)76.2 (116%)82.4 (126%)86.2 (132%)
RS000.5030.6 (100%)32.6 (106%)37.1 (121%)38.3 (125%)
RS150.4631.9 (100%)37.1 (116%)40.3 (126%)44.6 (139%)
RS300.4235.8 (100%)40.3 (112%)44.4 (124%)49.7 (138%)
RS450.3839.7 (100%)46.7 (118%)52.0 (130%)54.6 (137%)
RS600.3443.5 (100%)51.1 (117%)55.7 (128%)58.5 (135%)
RS750.3047.3 (100%)53.6 (111%)59.9 (127%)64.1 (136%)
Note: The compressive strength was calculated as the average value from the test of 3 specimens for each type of mixture.
Table
Table 5. Bond strength of concretes measured from pull-out tests.
Table 5. Bond strength of concretes measured from pull-out tests.
MixtureAge (day)Concrete Strength (MPa)Bond Strength μavg (MPa)Age (day)Concrete Strength (MPa)Bond Strength μavg (MPa)
NS00739.212.7 (100%)5647.815.1 (119%)
NS1547.914.3 (100%)61.217.2 (120%)
NS4559.516.6 (100%)72.920.5 (123%)
NS7565.220.1(100%)80.425.6 (127%)
RS0030.69.8 (100%)38.111.5 (117%)
RS1531.910.1 (100%)41.312.3 (122%)
RS4539.711.9 (100%)52.014.8 (124%)
RS7547.313.2 (100%)59.916.8 (127%)
NS002842.113.9 (109%)9156.316.3 (128%)
NS1555.416.0 (112%)64.218.7 (131%)
NS4565.618.8 (113%)78.822.1 (133%)
NS7576.223.4 (116%)85.227.1 (135%)
RS0032.610.4 (106%)41.312.4 (126%)
RS1537.111.3 (111%)44.613.5 (134%)
RS4546.213.5 (113%)54.816.4 (138%)
RS7552.615.0 (114%)63.518.3 (139%)
Table
Table 6. Measured results of the resistance to chloride-ion penetration of concretes.
Table 6. Measured results of the resistance to chloride-ion penetration of concretes.
MixtureTotal Charge Passed (Coulombs) *Age (Days)
28 Days56 Days91 Days
NS00960565676182high/high/high **
NS15694155895068high/high/high
NS45356230422928moderate/moderate/moderate
NS60226614781416moderate/low/low
NS75144611091076low/low/low
RS0010,50683298014high/high/high
RS15621448134139high/high/high
RS45297322992136moderate/moderate/moderate
RS6015071385922low/low/very low
RS75938861581very low/very low/very low
* Average value of 3 specimens. ** Charge passed, chloride permeability, coulombs: >4000 C = high, 2000–4000 C = moderate, 1000–2000 C = low, 100–1000 C = very low and <100 C = negligible.
Table
Table 7. Results of the concrete water permeability measurements.
Table 7. Results of the concrete water permeability measurements.
MixtureCompressive Strength (MPa)Water Permeability (%)
28 Days56 Days91 Days28 Days56 Days91 Days
NS0042.147.851.30.520.470.46
NS1555.461.364.20.460.410.40
NS4565.672.978.80.360.280.21
NS6072.377.582.40.250.220.16
NS7576.282.486.20.150.130.09
RS0032.639.138.30.840.810.79
RS1537.140.344.60.710.680.57
RS4546.752.054.60.580.490.38
RS6051.155.758.50.430.320.21
RS7552.659.964.10.300.230.18
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, S.-K.; Wu, C.-H. Improvement of Bond Strength and Durability of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Incorporating High Volume Blast Furnace Slag. Materials 2021, 14, 3708. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133708

AMA Style

Lin S-K, Wu C-H. Improvement of Bond Strength and Durability of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Incorporating High Volume Blast Furnace Slag. Materials. 2021; 14(13):3708. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133708

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Shu-Ken, and Chung-Hao Wu. 2021. "Improvement of Bond Strength and Durability of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Incorporating High Volume Blast Furnace Slag" Materials 14, no. 13: 3708. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133708

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop