Next Article in Journal
Effects of Modified Nano-SiO2 Particles on Properties of High-Performance Cement-Based Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
First Large Scale Application with Self-Healing Concrete in Belgium: Analysis of the Laboratory Control Tests
Previous Article in Journal
Zeolites in Phenol Removal in the Presence of Cu(II) Ions—Comparison of Sorption Properties after Chitosan Modification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Self-Healing Properties of Clinker/PVP Microsphere in Cement Paste
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Characterization of Self-Healing Mortar Based on “Build-In” Carbonation

Key Laboratory of Advanced Civil Engineering Materials Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(3), 644; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030644
Submission received: 29 December 2019 / Revised: 19 January 2020 / Accepted: 29 January 2020 / Published: 1 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Healing and Smart Cementitious Construction Materials)

Abstract

:
In this study, a new type of cement-based healing pellets (CHPs) were proposed to accelerate the healing efficiency of concrete, which was mainly based on the introduced Na2CO3 on promoting the formation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in cracks. The effects of Na2CO3 on the characteristics of CHPs were firstly investigated, and then the properties of cement mortar mixed with CHPs were studied quantitatively, including the workability, mechanical properties and healing ability. The results showed that higher dosages of Na2CO3 in CHPs decreased the size range of pellets and reduced the setting time, fluidity and heat of hydration of mortar. Still more, CHPs reduced the early strength of mortar but kept the intensity growth rate stable such that it had nearly no negative effect on the later strength. With the content of CHPs increasing, the strength of mortar showed a decreasing trend, while the pore-filling efficiency and strength healing rate of mortar were further improved. In addition, as a new type of self-healing pellets for concrete based on the “build-in” carbonation, CHPs improved the strength and healing effectiveness of cement mortar. When the dosage of Na2CO3 in CHPs and the content of CHPs in mortar were at 10% and 25%, respectively, mortar obtained highest strength in the later stage and the best healing effect.

1. Introduction

As an irreplaceable construction material, concrete is confronted with a potential threat to the durability after cracked [1]. Autogenous or autonomous healing of fine cracks has been reported in many studies, and can be defined as the ability of materials to actively transform energy and matter from the surrounding to heal the damage [2].
Autogenous healing of cracks in concrete bridges was investigated in the 1930s [3,4], which mainly relied on the continued hydration and carbonization of cement mortar to fill cracks with hydrated gels and calcium carbonate crystals [5,6,7,8,9,10]. The carbonation process was proven to be an efficient way to heal the cracks by Edvardsen [11]. It is noteworthy that the formation of calcite in this process was limited by the concentration of CO2 and the compactness of samples, the filling and repairing effect of which can only be maintained on the surface of the crack in the natural state [12]. In order to improve the self-healing ability of cement structure, a common way is introducing a repairing substance into the mortar [6]. This way is called autonomic healing and has got lots of attention in recent years. Some scholars have made great achievements by introducing microorganisms, shape memory alloys, microcapsules or hollow glass fibers into concrete to accelerate the repair process. Once the concrete structures are damaged, these repair materials would be aroused to heal the cracks and improve the mechanical properties.
However, the incompatibility between the repair materials and cement mortar may cause other forms of damage, like strength loss and durability reduction of mortar [1,9,13]. Hence, some scholars adopted compatible strategies by imitating autogenous healing to heal cracks [1]. This method also mainly depends on the formation of hydration gel and calcium carbonate crystal in later stages in the water environment, which could retain the compatibility of cement mortar and healing materials. The effects of mineral admixtures including an expansive agent, geo-materials and chemical agents on the self-healing properties of mortar were studied by Kishi et al. [14,15,16]. On this basis, the active silica and crystal admixtures were studied by Sisomphonl et al. [17]. Jiang et al. [18] investigated the healing effect of minerals and found that high pHs and high temperatures accelerated the healing progress. Nonetheless, the issues on the long-term stability and repeatability of the healing ability have not yet been properly addressed.
Li et al. [19] coated ceramists with waterproofing material or Portland cement paste, respectively. It was found that the utilization of Portland cement paste as a coating shell improved the compatibility of mortar and ceramists better than waterproofing material. Wang et al. [20] chose ceramists as the carrier to safeguard the healing substance, which made up with expansive agents, crystalline admixture and calcium hydrogen phosphate. The results proved that taking ceramists as a container to design repeatable self-healing concrete was a feasible way. The pan-pelletizing technology was utilized to prepare mineral pellets by Alghamri [21,22], then those prepared pellets were coated by PVA to reduce the invalid release of mineral. These pellets showed a remarkable performance on crack sealing but forfeited the expected mechanical properties and strength healing rates of mortar. Choi [23,24] et al. introduced ultra-fine CO2 bubbles into the saturated Ca(OH)2 solution to promote the formation of CaCO3; it was found that the crystal forms of CaCO3 could be controlled by optimizing the temperature and pH, but there was no further study on the mechanical effect. Some scholars [15,25] introduced NaHCO3 and Na2CO3 into mortar to investigate the cementitious recrystallization with expansive agents. They affirmed that carbonates increased the self-healing ability of concrete, while the strength of mortar decreased in the alkalescent mix water. It has been proven that the morphology of the grains of coarse aggregate has an enormous effect on the compressive strength and stiffness of concretes; the proper incorporation of irregular aggregate into mortar improved their performance [26,27].
The previous studies showed that the introduced healing materials decreased the strength of cement mortar [28]. In order to prepare a new kind of self-healing pellets, which have better compatibility with concrete, cement-based self-healing pellets were designed and investigated in this study. CO32- was introduced into cement mortar through the pellets to realize the build-in carbonation and realize the build-in carbonation and improve the healing efficiency. The compatibility between the cement-based healing pellets (CHPs) and cement mortar was ensured without an organic shell around the pellets. The characteristics of CHPs met three merits: the compatibility of packaging shell and mortar; the shell is strong enough to protect repair agents while mixing; pellets exist stabilize in alkaline environments [29,30].
Then, a series of studies were carried out on those pellets. Firstly, the feasibility of this method was studied by the characteristics of CHPs, such as the contents of CO32- and its release rate in water. Next, the effects of CHPs on the fresh mortar were studied by the flowability, setting time and hydration heat. Then, the effects of pellets on the mechanical properties and healing rates of mortar were investigated by the test of compressive and four-point bending, combined with the acoustic emission (AE) test.

2. Experiments

2.1. Raw Materials

The cement used for the preparation of CHPs and mortar mixtures was Ordinary Portland Cement (CEM, I 52.5N, which was supplied by Jiangnan-xiaoyetian Cement Co., Ltd. and produced in Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.) with a particle density of 2.7–3.2 g/cm3. Its specific surface area range was 0.30–0.40 m2/g. The particle size distribution of the cement was measured by laser particle size analysis (LS320) (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), as shown in Figure 1. Its average particle size was 16.1458 μm. The grain size of quartz sand ranged from 0.425 to 0.212 mm. Its specific gravity was 2.65 g/cm3. The chemical compositions are presented in Table 1. River sand was provided by a local supplier of building materials, with a maximum grain size of 3 mm and bulk density of 1.577 g/cm3.
The test of Na2CO3 was referenced to ASTM E359-17 [31]. It has a density of 0.88 g/mL, a total alkalinity is 99.63%, its percentage of loss on heating is 0.3%, the percentage of NaCl is 0.014% and the screen redundancy of 180 μm is 94%.

2.2. Preparation and Test of CHPs

2.2.1. Pelletization Process

The preparation of CHPs requires a low water-to-cement ratio (w/c), which is 0.22 in this paper. The dosages of Na2CO3 introduced into pellets were divided into 0%, 5%, 10% and 15%. The quartz sand was mixed to disperse pellets, which ensures that the diameter and shape of CHPs meet the experimental requirements. In this experiment, the content of quartz sand was prepared into pellets every 10 g from 0 to 100 g, and without its incorporation, Pellets A could not be formed. However, when the content of quartz sand was high, the diameter of Pellets D decreased obviously. When the mass of quartz sand was 30 g per group, the preparation of CHPs was the most beneficial for the preparation of pellets. Detailed mix proportions of CHPs are shown in Table 2.
The pelletization processes of CHPs were carried out in a JJ-5 cement mixer (which was produced in Shanghai, China and supplied by Shanghai Dongxing Building Materials Test Equipment Co., Ltd.) in an environment of 25 ± 2 °C and humidity of 70% ± 5% RH. The process of feeding in raw materials included seven steps as shown in Figure 2. At the first 30 s, 85% cement was mixed with water in the mixer at a low speed, then quartz sand and Na2CO3 were added in the cement paste. After mixing them for another 90 s at high speed, the remained 15% cement was added into the mixture and stirred for 210 s at low speed. The total preparation procedure was 4 min. Later, the mixture was sealed inside a clear plastic bag at 25 ± 2 °C to prevent the invasion of water and CO32- in the air. After curing for 15 days, the pellets were sieved into different size ranges.

2.2.2. Size Grading and Bulk Density

The CHPs prepared with different dosages of Na2CO3 (See Figure 3) exhibited diverse grain size distributions. The pellets were sieved after 15 days of curing and divided into five size ranges, namely 0.16–0.315 mm, 0.315–0.63 mm, 0.63–1.25 mm, 1.25–2.5 mm and 2.5–5 mm. After baking for 48 h in an oven at 50 °C, the size grading and bulk density of the sieved pellets were tested according to JGJ-52-2006 [32].

2.2.3. Microstructural Tests

In this study, X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) and thermogravimetric analysis (TG) were used to quantitatively analyze the compositions of pellets and the content of unreacted Na2CO3. The specimens were dried, ground and passed through the 75 micron diameter sieve, which removed the interference of quartz sand. The apparatus used for XRD was a Rigaku Ultimate IV, which was made in Tokyo, Japan, and the diffractometer was operated at a scanning rate of 10 °/min in the scanning range 5°–90°.
In the thermogravimetric analysis, the weights of samples A, B, C and D were 13.66 mg, 6.949 mg, 9.652 mg and 13.38 mg, respectively. The pyrolysis characteristics of CHPs were studied in the atmosphere of nitrogen by TA SDT Q600, which was produced by NETZSCH, Selb, Germany. The temperature range was set at 30–1000 °C, heating up at a rate of 10 °C /s. The mass fraction of CaCO3 in pellets (m1) was calculated by Equation (1), the mass fraction of Na2CO3 that had been consumed by CHPs (m2) is calculated by Equation (2) and the total mass fraction of Na2CO3 that was introduced in the pellets (m3) is given by Equation (3).
m 1 = w × 100.09 44.0095
m 2 = m 1 × 105.99 100.09
m 3 = x 1 + 0.22 + x
Then, the mass fraction of unreacted Na2CO3 (m4) was calculated by Equation (4):
m 4 = m 3 m 2
where w is the mass fraction of CO2, which was produced by the thermal decomposition of CaCO3, and x is the dosage of Na2CO3 that introduced into CHPs.
The surface characteristics and crystal forms of specimens were observed by an environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM, Quanta 200F) (FEI company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The morphology of CHPs was recorded at magnifications of 1000× and 10,000× at a voltage of 15 KV. The samples used in the SEM observations were coated with platinum.

2.2.4. The Ion Exchange Rate of CHPs

Due to the hydrophilicity of cement-based materials, Na2CO3 in the outer shell of CHPs is easy to dissolve in aqueous solution. In this study, the dissolving rate was measured by a titration experiment. The indicator was a mixture of bromocresol green and methyl red, and the standard titration solution was 1.5 mol/L hydrochloric acid. The experiment was carried out with 100 g dried CHPs and 800 g deionized water as shown in Figure 4. This timer was started when the pellets were put into the deionized water. Later, 10 g solution was taken out from the container by dropper at the sampling time and two drops of acid-base indicator was added into it. Then, hydrochloric acid was added into the solution drop by drop to observe the color change of the solution. The experiment was terminated when the color changed from green to pink. The dosage of hydrochloric acid and the concentration of alkali ions in the solution were collected.

2.3. Preparation and Test of Mortar

2.3.1. Preparation of Mortar

In this study, the effects of CHPs on the properties of cement mortar were investigated on the base of Table 3. The types, sizes and contents of pellets were mainly taken into consideration. The mixing proportions were designated in a w/c ratio of 0.5 and cement–sand (c/s) ratio of 0.4. The contents of CHPs to the river sand of Group K were 10%, 25% and 40%. The specimens were prepared and cured according to GB/T 17671-1999 [33].
The pellets were divided into two groups of grain size, namely small pellets and large pellets. In the group of small pellets, the size ranges were mainly of 0.65–1.25 mm and 1.25–2.5 mm, which had a ratio of 2. The large pellets were in size ranges of 2.5–5 mm and 1.25–2.5 mm with a ratio of 2.

2.3.2. Workability Test

Fluidity and Setting Time of Fresh Mortar

To determine the effect of CHPs on the fluidity of the fresh mortar, CHPs were introduced into the mortar as a partial replacement of sand as shown in Table 3. The fluidity was determined according to BS EN 1015–3:1999 [34]. The setting time of mortar was measured by a concrete penetration resistance tester based on JGJ/T 70-2009 [35]. A steel container with a diameter of 140mm and a height of 75 mm was used to hold fresh mortar. The test needle with a cross-section area of 30 mm2 (Ap) pressed into the internal 25 mm of the mortar within 10s. The test was started from 1 hour after molding, every 15 min frequency. Then, after the resistance reached 0.3 MPa, it was tested every 10 min frequency, until 4 MPa, one test per minute to 0.5 Mpa. The pressure gauge with a precision of 0.5 MPa was used to record the resistance as NP. The penetration resistance was recorded as fp, fp, and is calculated as shown in Equation (5).
f p = Np Ap

Isothermal Calorimetry

The effects of CHPs worked on the hydration process of fresh mortar were carried out by TAM Air (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). This test was conducted according to GB/T 12959-2008 [36] and operated in a temperature humidity chamber with 100% humidity at 20 °C. The temperature was recorded for the first 48 h at a frequency of once a minute. In this study, the content of CHPs was set at a constant value of 20%, and the types and sizes of CHPs were mainly investigated and discussed.

2.3.3. Mechanical Test

Compressive Strength

The compressive strength was measured according to JGJ70-2009 [37]. Cement specimens were prepared at a size of 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm, then cured in a standard curing room at a temperature of 20 ± 1 °C and relative humidity >95%. The compressive strength testing was carried out at a loading rate of 2400 N/s for the specimens at the ages of 7, 28 and 56 days. The strength was calculated from the average of three specimens for each group, and precisely to 0.1 MPa.

Flexural Strength

The flexural strength of specimens, denoted by Fmax, was measured by the four-point bending test according to ASTM C348 [38]. The specimens with a size of 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm were prepared and cured, then the four-point bending tests were carried out at the age of 28 days. The loading processes were conducted in two steps. Firstly, specimens were loaded at a rate of 5 N/s to 10 N, then the machine was operated by displacement control at the speed of 0.08 mm/min until it broke. The flexural strength was calculated on an average of three specimens per group.

Healing Rate of Flexural Strength

After conducting the test of flexural strength, the specimens that were prepared for the healing tests were pre-damaged to 60% Fmax under the same loading conditions. Then, they were cured in saturated lime water at 23 ± 2 °C for 7, 28 and 56 days, respectively. The secondary flexural strength was measured while the force position remained. Finally, the strength healing ratio was calculated though three specimens per group.

2.3.4. Acoustic Emission Test

Active AE

The velocity of the longitudinal stress wave through specimens is determined by the transmitting time. The device of AE is shown in Figure 5. The initial transmission time was tested after curing but before the loading of specimens, and it was used to investigate the compactness of mortar, which was recorded as T0. The second transmission time was tested after preloading with the position of sensors unmoved, which was recorded as T1. After curing in saturated lime water for 7, 28 and 56 days, respectively, the time that pulse passed through the specimens was recorded as T2. The damage parameter (D) was estimated by Equations (6) and (7); the damage parameter after loading was Df, and the damage parameter after healing was Dh [39,40,41]. When the damage parameter decreased to a negative value (D < 0), a higher pulse velocity than that of the intact specimens was indicated.
D f = 1 ( T 0 T 1 ) 2
D h = 1 ( T 0 T 2 ) 2

Passive AE

Caused by the degree of damage, the acoustic emission signal exhibits different energy, amplitude, etc. Real-time dynamic monitoring detects the internal damage of the mortar under stress, and receives these signals by broadband transducers installed at either end of specimens as shown in Figure 5 [41,42]. The transducers (R15) with a broadband response ranging from 60 to 400 kHz and a maximum sensitivity at 150 kHz were used. The cumulative energy of signals was calculated when the load of the four-point bending test reached 60% Fmax during the preloading and breaking process. The cumulative energy ratio was recorded as the cumulative energy of the secondary load divided by that of the first load.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of CHPs

3.1.1. Size Grading and Bulk Density

The grain distributed curve of CHPs is shown in Figure 6. It finds that Na2CO3 decreased the size range of pellets effectively. With the dosages of Na2CO3 increasing, CHPs are gradually closing to Zone III (fine sand) from Zone I. The changes in grain size of CHPs were caused by the procoagulant effect of Na2CO3 on cement mortar. The introduced Na2CO3 hardened the cement paste in the process of mixing and promoted the precipitation of gyrolite, calcite and conversion of calcium silicate gel [23,24]. With the dosages of Na2CO3 increasing, it is easier for the hardened cement paste to break up during mixing. However, the new surfaces were supplemented with Na2CO3 or CaCO3, which made the dispersed pellets difficult to be consolidated. The main size range of pellets was from 0.35 to 5 mm.
The bulk densities of CHPs with different size ranges are shown in Table 4. It shows that the bulk densities of different size ranges of pellets were similar and the bulk density of the river sand was 1.577 g/cm3. Therefore, the bulk densities of CHPs were similar to the Ordinary Portland Cement but 25% lower than river sand. Thus, the introduction of CHPs decreased the densities of specimens.

3.1.2. Microstructural Tests

The results of XRD and TG are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8 below. From Figure 7, the crystal components of CHPs include calcite and Ca(OH)2. This proves that Na2CO3 promoted the production of calcite, which was similar to how the process of carbon dioxide acted. It confirms that the “build-in” carbonation of concrete could be realized by introducing Na2CO3 internally.
The thermal loss peak between 750 °C and 950 °C (Peak 4) was caused by the thermal decomposition of CaCO3. The mass fraction of unreacted Na2CO3. was calculated as shown in Table 5. It is found that with the dosages of Na2CO3 increasing, the concentration of unreacted CO32− in CHPs increased, too. With the dosages of Na2CO3 doubling or increasing three-fold in pellets, the mass fraction of unreacted Na2CO3 also double or increase three-fold. It means that the concentration of Na2CO3 in CHPs could be controlled by the dosages of Na2CO3 introduced.
The morphology of pellets is shown in Figure 9. It shows that with the dosages of Na2CO3 increasing, pellets become loose gradually. It affirmed that the addition of Na2CO3 decreased the mechanical property of cement specimens [43]. While the surface of Pellets A was composed of C-S-H gel and ettringite, with the dosages of Na2CO3 in pellets increasing, the content of ettringite decreased obviously. Then, the content of gel was also replaced by crystal until the surface of CHPs was gradually covered by crystals. Especially Pellets D, the surface was filled with crystals without gel and ettringite, which means Na2CO3 promoted the formation of calcite to cross-linking in the cement mortar. The introduction of Na2CO3 inhibited or consumed the production of ettringite, and promoted the formation of calcite.

3.1.3. The Ion Release Rate of CHPs

The concentration changes of alkaline ions that CHPs dissolved in deionized water are shown in Figure 10. It shows that when soaked for 10 hours, the alkaline concentrations of the leaching solutions of pellets A, B, C and D were, respectively, 77.16%, 74.4%, 70.68% and 68.23% of the final concentration (after soaking for 60 h). When the alkali concentration was 80% of the final concentration, the soaking time of pellets A, B, C and D was 10 h, 12 h, 13 h and 16 h, respectively. It means that with the dosages of Na2CO3 increasing, the ion release speed was increased while the ion release ratio (ratio of current alkali concentration to final alkali concentration) was decreased. The ion release ratio showed an obvious differentiation for pellets with different size ranges as shown in Figure 11a–d, which illustrates the release rates of CHPs with 0%, 5%, 10% and 15% dosages of Na2CO3, respectively. Larger pellets put up a lower ion release ratio in deionized water, and this effect was more obvious with the dosages of Na2CO3 in the pellets increasing. It illustrates that large pellets have a better effect on the storage of CO32− than small pellets, especially in pellets with higher dosages of Na2CO3. Their denser surface reduced the ion release of CHPs.

3.2. The Workability of Mortar with CHPs

3.2.1. Fluidity and setting Time of Fresh Mortar

The size ranges of the pellets were optimized by the fluidity of mortar. While the small pellets have a significant effect of reducing fluidity to be used, two ranges of pellets were selected for further study, namely large and small pellets, respectively. In the group of small pellets, the size ranges of these pellets were mainly 0.65–1.25 mm and 1.25–2.5 mm, which had a ratio of 2. The pellets in the large group were in the ranges of 2.5–5 mm and 1.25–2.5 mm with a ratio of 2. The fluidity of cement mortar is shown in Figure 12 and the fluidity of Group K was 236 mm.
It suggests CHPs decreased the fluidity of mortar obviously compared with Group K except for the large pellets B-L and C-L. It means that the pellets without Na2CO3 decreased the fluidity of mortar obviously, while Pellets B improved the fluidity of mortar with the low dosage of Na2CO3 but a smooth surface. The pellets with higher dosages of Na2CO3 decreased the fluidity of cement mortar obviously, which was caused by the coagulation-promoting effect of Na2CO3 on the fresh mortar. As such, the fluidity of mortar with Pellets D-S was 32% lower than with Pellets B-S.
The increasing contents of CHPs decreased the fluidity of fresh mortar. When the size range of pellets was 2.5–5 mm, the fluidity was greatly decreased with the contents of pellets increasing. As the contents of pellets increased, the partially hardened regions created in the mortar were interconnected, which decreased in the fluidity of fresh mortar.
The increasing sizes of CHPs improved the fluidity of cement mortar. The fluidity of mortar was higher than 180 mm except for the D-s-3 group, and the fluidity of mortar with large pellets was higher than Group K. It was caused by the fact that the specific surface areas of large pellets were smaller than the river sand, and the contact areas with cement mortar were smaller, which improved the fluidity of mortar.
The setting time of the mortar was shown in Figure 13. It shows that CHPs had less effect on the setting time of mortar, especially for the large pellets. With the dosages of Na2CO3 increasing in pellets, the setting time of mortar decreased accordingly. The setting time of mortar with pellets D-S was 15% lower than with pellets B-S. As for the small pellets, when the dosages of Na2CO3 were 0%, 5%, 10% and 15%, the setting time was reduced by 2 min,6 min, 8 min and 19 min respectively. Combining with the fluidity test, it indicated that the addition of CHPs into fresh cement led to the early rapid release of Na2CO3. With the setting and hardening of mortar, the release was suppressed and the setting time was partially compensated, especially for Pellets C. This improved the fluidity of mortar and had nearly no reduction effect on the setting time.

3.2.2. Isothermal Calorimetry

As Figure 14 illustrated, the power and cumulative energy produced per gram of cement for the first 48 h were exhibited. As shown in Figure 14a, it finds that the increased dosages of Na2CO3 in pellets, decreased the hydration heat of cement mortar obviously and the increased heat release of mortar was mainly in the first 12 h. The hydration heat was gradually slowed down in later stages, which was lower than Group A. This confirms that the release of the material in CHPs can be controlled at the early stage. At the same time, the size ranges of Pellets A and B have less effect on the hydration heat of mortar, but the large pellets (Pellets C and D) decreased the hydration heat of mortar obviously. It indicates that the large pellets (Pellets C and D) have a slow-release effect at the early stage, which achieved the carry and protect of healing materials.
In addition, peak time and peak power values for mixtures were summarized in Figure 14b. The addition of Pellets B showed a slight variation compared with Pellets A. The peak time was shortened to 50% by the addition of Pellets C and D compared with Pellets A. Similarly, the peak power was only slightly affected by the addition of Pellets B, while the addition of Pellets C and D increased the peak power in the range of 38% and 50%. The peak time and peak power of mortar confirmed that CHPs had an efficiency-promoting effect on the hydration reaction of mortar. Pellets A and B had similar peaking time and peak power values, which indicates that the concentration of Na2CO3 stored in Pellets B was low, while Pellets C and D had a higher concentration of Na2CO3.
The focus of the present study was to prepare and characterize the new self-healing elements based on the proposed mechanism of “build-in” carbonation. Thus, the varying healing pellets were firstly prepared and investigated, by which Group C exhibited comparatively better performance. Therefore, the strength tests and AE tests of the mortars incorporating Group C were conducted as an example to reveal the influence of the healing element on the mortar as well as its healing effect. The contents and grain sizes of CHPs were mainly discussed in this paper, and the healing effects of specimens were evaluated by comparison with Group K.

3.3. The Mechanical Property of Specimens with CHPs

3.3.1. Compressive Strength

The compressive strength of specimens at the 7th, 28th and 56th day is presented in Figure 15. The addition of large CHPs decreased the early compressive strength but increased the later strength of mortar. On the seventh day, the strength of specimens introduced with CHPs was lower than Group K; meanwhile, the strength of specimens with large pellets was lower than with small pellets. This is caused by the release of Na2CO3 of large pellets in the early stage being less than that of small pellets. On the 28th day, the strength of specimens with CHPs was lower than Group K, but those with large pellets had higher strength than those with small pellets. On the 56th day, the specimens with large pellets showed the highest strength; the strength of mortar with small pellets was still lower than Group B. This is due to the slow release of CO32− in the healing pellets, which gradually improved the strength of specimens. It showed that the replacement of sand with CHPs increased the strength growth rates of mortar than Group K. In summary, the addition of CHPs into mortar realized the compatibility between healing pellets and cement mortar preliminary, however, the release of Na2CO3 in mortar challenged the later healing effect.

3.3.2. Flexural Strengths

The flexural strength of mortar cured for 28 days is shown in Figure 16. It shows that small pellets have a more obvious effect on decreasing the flexural strength of the mortar, which is similar to the trend of compressive strength. Nevertheless, with the contents of CHPs increasing, the trend of strength growth fluctuated. It was caused by the two-blade function of CHPs on the strength growth of mortar. When the content of pellets was 25%, the mortar had higher flexural strengths than Group K, which indicates that the contents of pellets mixed into mortar could be optimized, and the 25% contents of pellets were suitable for the curing age of 28 days.

3.3.3. The Healing Rate of Flexural Strength

The healing rate of the flexural strength of mortar is shown in Figure 17. For the curing age of seven days, the healing rate of Group K was better than groups introduced with CHPs, and with the contents of CHPs increasing, the healing rates showed a downward trend. This meant that the hydration of cement in Group K brought a higher healing effect [44,45,46,47]. It was caused by CHPs accelerating the hydration of mortar and improving the cement hydration rate. For the cement used in this experiment, which had an average particle size distribution of 16.1458 μm, the degree of hydration was less than 80% at the age of 28 days under the w/c of 0.5 [47]. Thus, the early healing effects of groups introduced with CHPs were lower than Group K.
For the curing age of 28 days, the growth of flexural healing rates of groups introduced with CHPs was higher than Group K, and it was increased with the contents of CHPs increasing. It is known that the healing effects of CHPs on the pretreatment-damaged specimens were obviously during this period. The groups introduced with large CHPs had higher strength healing rates than those with small CHPs. It means that CHPs can heal the damaged mortar and larger pellets have a more significant self-healing effect. For the curing age of 56 days, the healing rates of mortar were significantly slowed. The strength recovery rate of Group K was lower than groups with CHPs in this stage, which meant that the later healing effects of specimens were improved by CHPs. The strength healing rate of groups C-L-2 was 11.75% higher than Group K. As the ion released rate shows, mortar with large sizes showed better healing effects than those with small pellets, which was caused by the stored Na2CO3 in the pellets. It means that the addition of CHPs into mortar maintained the healing work well in the later stage.

3.4. Evaluation of Healing effect

3.4.1. Active AE

The initial transmitting time (T0) was performed to investigate the compactness of mortar before loading. As shown in Figure 18, the most compact specimens were Group K, and with the contents of CHPs increasing, T0 showed an upward trend. It meant that the addition of CHPs decreased the compact of mortar, which was not only caused by the low density of CHPs, but also by the loosened structures around the pellets (caused by Na2CO3). When the contents of small pellets were 10%, 25% and 40%, the transmitting time was 2.345%, 5.49% and 9.589% higher than Group K, respectively. Plus, the time that the pulse transmitted through specimens with large pellets was shorter than those with small pellets, meaning that smaller pellets had higher dosages of Na2CO3 released in mortar, which decreased the density and strength of mortar. T1 and T2 were tested after specimens had been preloaded and cured for 7, 28 and 56 days, separately, as Figure 19 illustrates. The damage parameter (Df-Dh) showed that CHPs had a long-term filling effect in mortar. For the specimens cured for seven days, it was found that the higher contents of pellets in mortar caused more serious damage after preloading. For the specimens cured for 28 days, the healing effects of mortar with pellets were obvious. When the contents of pellets were 45%, the healing effects of mortar were the best. For the specimens cured for 56 days, it was known that the healing effect of Group K and Group C-S-1 was slightly different after curing for 28 days and 56 days, but the healing effect with small pellets decreased gradually with the increased contents of CHPs, which indicated that the healing effects of mortar with small pellets were not as good as those of large pellets.

3.4.2. Passive AE

In this study, the energy produced by the loading process to 60% Fmax was accumulated. The energy ratio is shown in Figure 20. For the first seven days, Group K showed the highest energy recovery ratio, which was the highest flexural strength healing rate, too. With the contents of pellets increasing in mortar, the energy recovery ratios were gradually decreased. It means that the addition of CHPs decreased the early healing ability of mortar. For the curing age of 28 days, there was an obvious increase in the energy recovery ratios of the mortar with CHPs, which meant that pellets had a good healing efficiency on concrete than Group K in this period. The energy recovery ratios were gradually increased with the contents of pellets increasing. It means that the addition of CHPs increased the bonding strength of mortar, which produced higher energy during loading. For the curing age of 56 days, the increase in energy recovery ratios was a little less. The groups introduced with CHPs had a better healing effect than Group K. Groups C-S-2 and C-L-2 had the highest energy recovery ratio, while the 40% contents of CHPs had a worse energy recovery ratio. It could be concluded that the flexural strength healing ratios of mortar were improved by CHPs. When the content of CHPs was 25%, the highest flexural strength of the mortar was after healing.

4. Conclusions

The introduction of new self-healing pellets (CHPs) realized the “build-in” carbonation of mortar. CHPs present a circular granular form with a density of 25% lower than river sand, and the addition of Na2CO3 decreased the size range of pellets, promoting the production of calcite. With the dosages of Na2CO3 increasing, the content of calcite increased evidently to cross-linking, and the large pellets had a more obvious ability to reduce the release of ions in water.
Pellets decreased the fluidity of the mortar except for pellets B-L and C-L. Increasing contents or decreasing the size ranges of pellets also decreased the fluidity of mortar. CHPs had less effect on the setting time of mortar, and with the dosages of Na2CO3 increasing in pellets, the hydration heat of cement mortar decreased obviously. This means that CHPs reduced the early release of Na2CO3 in fresh mortar.
The compatibility between healing pellets and mortar was basically realized. The addition of CHPs reduced the early compressive strength of mortar, but the later strength gradually caught up with or exceeded the control group. The larger pellets brought a higher later strength of mortar than small pellets.
The healing effect of CHPs in mortar is extended. With the increase of contents or size ranges of pellets, the microstructure of mortar was much looser. The mortar with CHPs had an obvious filling effect and strength healing rate than Group K. While cured for 28 or 56 days, there was still showed an obvious filling effect on cement mortar.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W., W.L. and Z.J.; data curation, X.W. and W.L.; formal analysis, X.W.; funding acquisition, W.L. and Z.J.; investigation, X.W.; methodology, X.W.; project administration, W.L.; resources, W.L. and Z.J.; supervision, W.L. and Z.J.; visualization, Z.J.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W.; writing—review and editing, W.L. and Z.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878481, 51678442, 51878480, 51878496), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (18ZR1441500), National Key Research and Development Projects (2018YFC0705404), National High-speed Train Union Fund (U1534207), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Top Interdiscipline Funds of Civil Engineering for Tongji University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this study, and the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. De Belie, N.; Gruyaert, E.; Al-Tabbaa, A.; Antonaci, P.; Baera, C.; Bajare, D.; Darquennes, A.; Davies, R.; Ferrara, L.; Jefferson, T.; et al. A review of self-healing concrete for damage management of structures. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mihashi, H.; Kaneko, Y.; Nishiwaki, T.; Otsuka, K. Fundamental study on development of intelligent concrete characterized by self-healing capability for strength. Trans. Jpn. Concr. Inst. 2001, 22, 441–450. [Google Scholar]
  3. Soroker, V.J.; Denson, A.J. Autogenous healing of concrete. Zement 1926, 25, 76. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brandeis, F. Autogenous healing of concrete. Beton u Eisen 1937, 12, 36. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu, M.; Johannesson, B.; Geiker, M. A review: Self-healing in cementitious materials and engineered cementitious composite as a self-healing material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Rooij, M.; Van Tittelboom, K.; De Belie, N.; Schlangen, E. Self-Healing Phenomena in Cement-Based Materials, State-of-the-Art Report of RILEM Technical Committee 221-SHC; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sanjun, M.A. Effectiveness of crack control at early age on the corrosion of steel bars in low modulus sisal and coconut fiber-reinforced mortar. Cem. Concr. Res. 1998, 28, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jacobsen, S. SEM Observations of the microstructure of frost deteriorated and self-healed concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 1995, 25, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Tittelboom, K.; De Belie, N. Self-healing in cementitious materials—A review. Materials 2013, 6, 2182–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mihashi, H.; Nishiwaki, T. Development of engineered self-healing and self-repairing concrete-state-of-the-art report. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2012, 10, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Edvardsen, C. Water permeability and autogenous healing of cracks in concrete. ACI Mater. J. 1999, 96, 448. [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang, H.; Ye, G.; Qian, C.; Schlangen, E. Self-healing in cementitious materials: Materials, methods and service conditions. Mater. Des. 2016, 92, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.; Dong, B.; Yang, Z.; Xu, J.; Chen, Q.; Li, H.; Xing, F.; Jiang, Z. Recent Advances in Intrinsic Self-Healing Cementitious Materials. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kishi, T.; Ahn, T.H.; Hosoda, A.; Suzuki, S.; Takaoka, H. Self-healing behaviour by cementitious recrystallization of cracked concrete incorporating expansive agent. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Self-healing Materials, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 18–20 April 2007. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ahn, T.H.; Kishi, T. Crack self-healing behavior of cementitious composites incorporating various mineral admixtures. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2010, 8, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kishi, T.H.; Ahn, T.H.; Morita, M.; Koide, T. Field test of self-healing concrete on the recovery of water tightness to leakage through cracks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Self-healing Materials, Bath, UK, 27–29 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sisomphon, K.; Copuroglu, O.; Koenders, E.A.B. Self-healing of surface cracks in mortar with expansive additive and crystalline additive. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, Z.; Li, W.; Yuan, Z. Influence of mineral additives and environmental conditions on the self-healing capabilities of cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 57, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, W.; Ling, C.; Jiang, Z. Evaluation of the potential use of form-stable phase change materials to improve the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 203, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, X.; Fang, C.; Li, D.; Han, N.; Xing, F. A self-healing cementitious composite with mineral admixtures and built-in carbonate. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 92, 216–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alghamri, R.; Kanellopoulos, A.; Litina, C.; Al-Tabbaa, A. Preparation and polymeric encapsulation of powder mineral pellets for self-healing cement based materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 186, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Alghamri, R.; Kanellopoulos, K.; Al-Tabbaa, A. Impregnation and encapsulation of lightweight aggregates for self-healing concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 124, 910–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Choi, H.; Inoue, M.; Kim, D.; Choi, H.; Sengoku, R. Effect of Addition of Ca2+ and CO32− Ions with Temperature Control on Self-Healing of Hardened Cement Paste. Materials 2019, 12, 2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Choi, H.; Choi, H.; Inoue, M.; Sengoku, R. Control of the polymorphism of calcium carbonate produced by self-healing in the cracked part of cementitious materials. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Reddy, V.V.; Rao, H.S.; Jayaveera, K.N. Influence of strong alkaline substances (sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate) in mixing water on strength and setting properties of concrete. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. (IJEMS) 2006, 13, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ostrowski, K.; Stefaniuk, D.; Sadowski, Ł.; Krzywiński, K.; Gicala, M.; Różańska, M. Potential use of granite waste sourced from rock processing for the application as coarse aggregate in high-performance self-compacting concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 238, 117794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ostrowski, K.; Sadowski, Ł.; Stefaniuk, D.; Wałach, D.; Gawenda, T.; Oleksik, K.; Usydus, I. The Effect of the Morphology of Coarse Aggregate on the Properties of Self-Compacting High-Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete. Materials 2018, 11, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Li, W.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, N.; Jiang, Z. Preparation and Properties of Melamine Urea-Formaldehyde Microcapsules for Self-Healing of Cementitious Materials. Materials 2016, 9, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, Y.-S.; Ryou, J.-S. Self-healing behavior for crack closing of expansive agent via granulation/film coating method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 71, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. De Koster, S.A.L.; Mors, R.M.; Nugteren, H.W.; Jonkers, H.M.; Meesters, G.M.H.; van Ommen, J.R. Geopolymer coating of bacteria-containing granules for use in self-healing concrete. Proc. Eng. 2015, 102, 475–484. [Google Scholar]
  31. Standard Test Methods for Analysis of Soda Ash (Sodium Carbonate); ASTM E359-17; ASTM International: West Conshocken, PA, USA, 2017.
  32. Standard for Technical Requirements and Test Method of Sand and Crushed Stone (or Gravel) for Ordinary Concrete; JGJ-52-2006; China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2006.
  33. Method of Testing Cements-Determination of Strength; BS EN 196-1:2016; CSBTS: Beijing, China, 1999.
  34. Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry. Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar; BS EN 1015-3:1999; BSI: Brussels, Belgium, 1999.
  35. Chinese Construction Industry Standards: Standards for Test Method of Basic Properties of Construction Mortar; JGJ/T 70-2009; China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2009.
  36. Test Methods for Heat of Hydration of Cement; GB/T 12959-2008; Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
  37. Standard for Test Method of Performance on Building Mortar; JGJ 70-90; National Standards of Peoples Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2009.
  38. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar; ASTM C348-08; ASTM International: West Conshocken, PA, USA, 2008.
  39. He, B.; Gao, Y.; Qu, L.; Duan, K.; Zhou, W.; Pei, G. Characteristics analysis of self-luminescent cement-based composite materials with self-cleaning effect. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 225, 1169–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gao, Y.; He, B.; Li, Y.; Tang, J.; Qu, L. Effects of nano-particles on improvement in wear resistance and drying shrinkage of road fly ash concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 151, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, W.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, Z. Acoustic characterization of damage and healing of microencapsulation-based self-healing cement matrices. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 84, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ren, Q.; Zeng, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Li, H. Functionalization of renewable bamboo charcoal to improve indoor environment quality in a sustainable way. J. Clean. Product. 2020, 246, 119028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Janotka, I. Hydration of the cement paste with Na2CO3 addition. Ceram.-Silik. 2001, 45, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wong, H.S.; Pappas, A.M.; Zimmermanb, R.W.; Buenfeld, N.R. Effect of entrained air voids on the microstructure and mass transport properties of concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gallucci, E.; Scrivener, K.; Groso, A.; Stampanoni, M.; Margaritondo, G. 3D experimental investigation of the microstructure of cement pastes using synchrotron X-ray microtomography (μCT). Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lam, L.; Wong, Y.L.; Poon, C.S. Degree of hydration and gel/space ratio of high-volume fly ash/cement systems. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bentz, D.P.; Haecker, J.C. An argument for using coarse cements in high-performance concretes. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 615–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of cement.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of cement.
Materials 13 00644 g001
Figure 2. Pelletization process of CHPs.
Figure 2. Pelletization process of CHPs.
Materials 13 00644 g002
Figure 3. The appearance of CHPs.
Figure 3. The appearance of CHPs.
Materials 13 00644 g003
Figure 4. The flow chart of the titration test.
Figure 4. The flow chart of the titration test.
Materials 13 00644 g004
Figure 5. The flow chart of healing test.
Figure 5. The flow chart of healing test.
Materials 13 00644 g005
Figure 6. Gradation zone curve of CHPs. (E) Boundary line of the sand in Zone II.
Figure 6. Gradation zone curve of CHPs. (E) Boundary line of the sand in Zone II.
Materials 13 00644 g006
Figure 7. XRD analysis of CHPs.
Figure 7. XRD analysis of CHPs.
Materials 13 00644 g007
Figure 8. TG analysis of CHPs. (a) CHPs with 0% NaCO3; (b) CHPs with 5% NaCO3; (c) CHPs with 10% NaCO3; (d) CHPs with 15% NaCO3.
Figure 8. TG analysis of CHPs. (a) CHPs with 0% NaCO3; (b) CHPs with 5% NaCO3; (c) CHPs with 10% NaCO3; (d) CHPs with 15% NaCO3.
Materials 13 00644 g008
Figure 9. SEM analysis of CHPs. (a) Morphology at 50 μm; (b) morphology at 5 μm.
Figure 9. SEM analysis of CHPs. (a) Morphology at 50 μm; (b) morphology at 5 μm.
Materials 13 00644 g009
Figure 10. Release rate of alkaline ions under different doses of Na2CO3.
Figure 10. Release rate of alkaline ions under different doses of Na2CO3.
Materials 13 00644 g010
Figure 11. Release Rate of alkaline particles under different sizes. (a) Size range of 0.315–0.63 mm; (b) size range of 0.63–1.25 mm; (c) size range of 1.25–2.5 mm; (d) size range of 2.5–5 mm.
Figure 11. Release Rate of alkaline particles under different sizes. (a) Size range of 0.315–0.63 mm; (b) size range of 0.63–1.25 mm; (c) size range of 1.25–2.5 mm; (d) size range of 2.5–5 mm.
Materials 13 00644 g011
Figure 12. The fluidity of mortar that have been compound allocation. (a) Large-sized pellets; (b) small-sized pellets.
Figure 12. The fluidity of mortar that have been compound allocation. (a) Large-sized pellets; (b) small-sized pellets.
Materials 13 00644 g012
Figure 13. Setting time of mortar mixed with pellets.
Figure 13. Setting time of mortar mixed with pellets.
Materials 13 00644 g013
Figure 14. The power and cumulative energy produced per gram of cement for the first 48 h. (a) Hydration heat of cement mortar; (b) heat flow of cement mortar.
Figure 14. The power and cumulative energy produced per gram of cement for the first 48 h. (a) Hydration heat of cement mortar; (b) heat flow of cement mortar.
Materials 13 00644 g014
Figure 15. Compressive strength of mortar. Error bars indicate relative standard uncertainty in experimental measurements.
Figure 15. Compressive strength of mortar. Error bars indicate relative standard uncertainty in experimental measurements.
Materials 13 00644 g015
Figure 16. Flexural strength of cement mortar. Error bars indicate relative standard uncertainty in experimental measurements.
Figure 16. Flexural strength of cement mortar. Error bars indicate relative standard uncertainty in experimental measurements.
Materials 13 00644 g016
Figure 17. Healing rate of flexural strength.
Figure 17. Healing rate of flexural strength.
Materials 13 00644 g017
Figure 18. Pulse time of mortar preloading.
Figure 18. Pulse time of mortar preloading.
Materials 13 00644 g018
Figure 19. The increment of damage parameter at different curing ages.
Figure 19. The increment of damage parameter at different curing ages.
Materials 13 00644 g019
Figure 20. Cumulative energy ratio of mortar.
Figure 20. Cumulative energy ratio of mortar.
Materials 13 00644 g020
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw materials (wt %).
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw materials (wt %).
MaterialsCaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3SO3K2OMgOTiO2Cl
CEM6520.904.563.232.650.870.650.220.05
Quartz sand0.0599.270.30.03-0.10.05--
Table 2. Mix proportion of cement-based healing pellets (CHPs).
Table 2. Mix proportion of cement-based healing pellets (CHPs).
Types N a 2 C O 3 C E M / % CEM/gWater/gNa2CO3/gQuartz Sand/g
A0%10022030
B5%10022530
C10%100221030
D15%100221530
Table 3. Mixing ratio of cement mortar.
Table 3. Mixing ratio of cement mortar.
GroupsCHPsSize C H P s R i v e r   S a n d   / %   CEM/gWater/gRiver Sand/g
K--05002501250
A-L-1A Large101125
A-L-2Large25937.5
A-L-3Large40750
A-S-1small101125
A-S-2small25937.5
A-S-3small40750
B-L-1BLarge101125
B-L-2Large25937.5
B-L-3Large40750
B-S-1small101125
B-S-2small25937.5
B-S-3small40750
C-L-1CLarge101125
C-L-2Large25937.5
C-L-3Large40750
C-S-1small101125
C-S-2small25937.5
C-S-3small40750
D-L-1DLarge101125
D-L-2Large25937.5
D-L-3Large40750
D-S-1small101125
D-S-2small25937.5
D-S-3small40750
Table 4. Bulk densities of CHPs.
Table 4. Bulk densities of CHPs.
Size/mm0.315–0.630.63–1.251.25–2.52.5–5
Bulk density/g·cm-31.1661.1331.1241.128
Table 5. The mass fraction of unreacted Na2CO3.
Table 5. The mass fraction of unreacted Na2CO3.
Types of CHPsMass Fraction/%
A0
B0.5966
C1.2968
D1.7748

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Li, W.; Jiang, Z. Preparation and Characterization of Self-Healing Mortar Based on “Build-In” Carbonation. Materials 2020, 13, 644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030644

AMA Style

Wang X, Li W, Jiang Z. Preparation and Characterization of Self-Healing Mortar Based on “Build-In” Carbonation. Materials. 2020; 13(3):644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030644

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xin, Wenting Li, and Zhengwu Jiang. 2020. "Preparation and Characterization of Self-Healing Mortar Based on “Build-In” Carbonation" Materials 13, no. 3: 644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030644

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop