Next Article in Journal
Characterization and Analysis of Porosities in High Pressure Die Cast Aluminum by Using Metallography, X-Ray Radiography, and Micro-Computed Tomography
Next Article in Special Issue
The Structure of Bitumen: Conceptual Models and Experimental Evidences
Previous Article in Journal
Surface-Bound and Volatile Mo Oxides Produced During Oxidation of Single MoS2 Crystals in Air and High Relative Humidity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Formulation of Bicelles Based on Lecithin-Nonionic Surfactant Mixtures

1
Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan
2
Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Lucas Heights, New South Wales 2234, Australia
3
Research and Development Division, KOSÉ Corporation, Tokyo 114-0005, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(14), 3066; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143066
Submission received: 29 May 2020 / Revised: 2 July 2020 / Accepted: 6 July 2020 / Published: 9 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure, Dynamics, and Phase Equilibria of Colloidal Dispersions)

Abstract

:
Bicelles have been intensively studied for use as drug delivery carriers and in biological studies, but their preparation with low-cost materials and via a simple process would allow their use for other purposes as well. Herein, bicelles were prepared through a semi-spontaneous method using a mixture of hydrogenated soybean lecithin (SL) and a nonionic surfactant, polyoxyethylene cholesteryl ether (ChEO10), and then we investigated the effect of composition and temperature on the structure of bicelles, which is important to design tailored systems. As the fraction of ChEO10 (XC) was increased, a bimodal particle size distribution with a small particle size of several tens of nanometers and a large particle size of several hundred nanometers was obtained, and only small particles were observed when XC ≥ 0.6, suggesting the formation of significant structure transition (liposomes to bicelles). The small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) spectrum for these particles fitted a core-shell bicelle model, providing further evidence of bicelle formation. A transition from a monomodal to a bimodal size distribution occurred as the temperature was increased, with this transition taking place at lower temperatures when higher SL-ChEO10 concentrations were used. SANS showed that this temperature-dependent size change was reversible, suggesting the SL-ChEO10 bicelles were stable against temperature, hence making them suitable for several applications.

1. Introduction

Liposomes are spherical molecular assemblies consisting of phospholipid bilayers. There are a wide variety of applications in pharmaceutical, biological, and cosmetic fields [1,2]. The advantages of liposomes are their encapsulation ability and controlled release of both water- and oil-soluble active ingredients [3]. Liposomes are particularly suitable as transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) because of their enhanced drug delivery efficiency and high skin penetration ability, both of which are due to the similarities between the lamellar structures of liposomes and the intercellular lipid layers [4]. A bicelle is another form of bilayer nanoparticle, which is typically a lipid nanodisc formed by mixtures of long-chain and short-chain phospholipids [5,6,7]. A bicelle has a flat bilayer disk with a rim, which is mainly formed by long-chain phospholipids and hydrophilic cosurfactants, respectively [8]. Alternative formulations of bicelles are also possible by mixtures of phospholipids and hydrophilic cosurfactants such as cholesterol sulfate [9], dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC) [10], and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80) [11,12]. Nonionic surfactants, such as Tween 80, which has much lower critical micelle concentrations than short-chain phospholipids or other ionic cosurfactants, are beneficial for their resistance to dilution as well as for efficient bicelle formulation. In addition, the combination of phospholipids and a nonionic surfactant provides denser packing of hydrophobic chains because of moderate repulsions between head groups, which can improve stability of the bicelles. A variety of applications have been reported for bicelles, including cell membrane models [13], membrane protein crystallization [14], protein structure studies [15], drug delivery carriers [16,17,18], coating materials [19], and nanomaterial synthesis [20]. One can control bicelle size by varying the mixing composition of lipid mixtures [21]. As for the TDDS, bicelles can penetrate deeper into the narrow intercellular spaces of the stratum corneum (SC) than liposomes because of their smaller size [22,23].
Most fundamental studies of bicelles, especially those for drug delivery systems, have employed phospholipids with high purity, while bicelles using low-cost materials are demanded for in various applications such as cosmetics and household products. It is also necessary to avoid complicated formulation processes such as thin-film formation. Wu et al. reported a semi-spontaneous method of vesicle preparation, in which materials were dissolved in a liquid alcohol and then mixed with water using a homogenizer [24]. In our previous report, we applied this method to a bicelle formulation based on soybean lecithin and Tween 80 [11]. In this report, we present that the lecithin-nonionic surfactant bicelles, prepared by using low-cost materials and by means of the semi-spontaneous method, have better temperature robustness compared to the typical bicelles [25]. In addition, the effects of temperature and concentration were studied, as these are known to influence the structural stability of bicelles [25]. Structural characterization was mainly performed by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) as well as dynamic light scattering (DLS). SANS is a powerful tool to characterize bicelle structures [23] because of the possibility to obtain structural information on a wide range of length scales (approximately 1–500 nm) as well as the inner structures of bicelles.

2. Materials and Methods

Hydrogenated soybean lecithin (SL) was obtained from YMC Ingrid Co. (Kobe, Japan). Poly(oxyethylene) cholesteryl ethers (ChEO10) were obtained from Nihon Emulsions Co. (Tokyo, Japan) under the product code CS-10, and contained an average of ten ethyleneoxide units. Dipropyleneglycol (DPG) was obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Co. (Osaka, Japan). Water was filtered using a reverse osmosis system (Elix3, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) before use as a solvent for preparing samples. Deuterium oxide (D2O) (provided by Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, Australia) was used instead of light water for small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) measurements.
SL and ChEO10 were dissolved in DPG with the weight ratio (SL + ChEO10)/DPG = 1/10, followed by the addition of water until the water concentration reached 78 wt%. Sample compositions in the latter sections are described by the following:
  • XC: ChEO10 weight fraction in the SL-ChEO10 mixture
  • WS: Weight fraction of the SL-ChEO10 mixture in the system
An ultrasonication apparatus (Smurt, Microtech Nichion Co., Funabashi, Japan) operated at 50 W and 20 kHz was used for sample preparation. After sonication was applied for 5 min, the samples were kept in a water bath at 25 °C.
DLS measurements were performed with HPPS (Malvern, Malvern, UK) to obtain intensity-based particle size distributions. A 3.0 mW He-Ne laser (λ = 633 nm) was used as a light source. Sample temperature was controlled by using a Peltier unit within the HPPS.
SANS measurements were performed using the QUOKKA SANS instrument (Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, Australia) at the Open Pool Australian Lightwater (OPAL) reactor of the Australian Neutron Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO). Details of this instrument have been described in literature [26]. Wavelengths of 5.0 and 8.1 Å at 10% wavelength resolution were used with sample aperture diameters of 10 mm. Three instrument configurations, namely source-to-sample and sample-to-detector distances of 20 and 20 m (with lens optics); 12 and 12 m; and 12 and 1.3 m, respectively, were used. A QUOKKA macro in Igor Pro software (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR, USA) originally written by Kline [27] was used. Merging of the three data sets per sample gave a continuous q-range between 0.0074 and 0.738 Å−1. Samples were measured at various temperatures in quartz cells with a path length of 2 mm (Hellma GmbH & Co., Mullheim, Germany). Curve fitting to the core-shell bicelle model [28] was performed using SasView small-angle scattering software [29].

3. Results

3.1. Particle Size in the Aqueous SL-ChEO10 System

We prepared samples containing SL-ChEO10 mixtures (WS = 0.02) at various XC. The appearance of the samples changed according to XC, as shown in Figure 1. At XC = 0, a transparent bluish solution was seen, which was a liposome dispersion. At XC = 0.6, the turbidity decreased, and a transparent and colorless solution was obtained at XC = 1.
Figure 2 shows the DLS results obtained at various XC. At XC = 0 (Figure 2a), a broad size distribution ranging from 100–1000 nm was obtained, which is the typical size of multilamellar-type phospholipid liposomes. On the other hand, the system containing the surfactant ChEO10 alone (XC = 1, Figure 2f) resulted in a narrow size distribution that peaked at around 40 nm. Sato et al. reported the behavior of ChEO10 in the aqueous phase, showing that the micellar phase existed at concentrations of up to 30 wt% at 25 °C, while a 2D-rectangular (ribbon) phase formed at higher concentrations [30]. Danino et al. [31] reported that ChEO10 micelles formed at 0.5 wt% were disc-like with a diameter of approximately 13 nm and a thickness of approximately 4 nm, which was confirmed by cryo-TEM, with a disc-to-ribbon transition occurring as ChEO10 concentration was increased. Their work found slightly elongated disc or short ribbon shapes at 2 wt% ChEO10, indicating that the diameters obtained in the present study (~40 nm) likely demonstrate the presence of such short ribbon micelles. The mixed SL-ChEO10 system at XC = 0.1 (Figure 2b) showed a bimodal size distribution, with a sharp distribution at around 20 nm and a broad distribution ranging from 80–400 nm. Bimodal distributions were also seen at XC = 0.4 and 0.5 (Figure 2c,d); however, the broad peak shifted toward the smaller one, and the height of the sharp peak increased with ChEO10 content. At XC = 0.6 (Figure 2e), only a sharp size distribution remained at around 30 nm.
During the sample preparation process, the XC = 1 sample appeared transparent even before ultrasonication, suggesting spontaneous formation of micelles. On the other hand, the XC = 0.6 sample was bluish and translucent before ultrasonication, indicating the presence of particles with sizes of several hundred nanometers. Therefore, the particles at XC = 0.6 were not formed spontaneously after ultrasonication, indicating that these particles were bicelles despite the similarities between the size distributions at XC = 0.6 and XC = 1. The bimodal distributions seen at XC = 0.1–0.5 indicate the coexistence of liposomes and bicelles. Such coexistence has also been reported in the DMPC-DTAC system [10] and in the egg lecithin-Tween 80 system [12].

3.2. Characterization of Bicelles by SANS

SANS can be used to characterize the precise structures of bicelles, [25,32,33] allowing information regarding their inner structures to be obtained. To confirm the formation of bicelles at XC = 0.6, SANS measurements were performed at 25 °C for samples at various XC, and the results are shown in Figure 3. The pure SL sample (XC = 0) showed a decay of intensity with a slope of −2 on the log-log plot, which is characteristic of liposomes [34]. The strong increase in scattering intensity, I(q), at low q indicates the presence of large particles, since the scattering intensity at q = 0 is dependent on the size of the particles. This reflects the presence of liposomes with sizes of several hundred nanometers, as shown in Figure 2a. The shoulder at around q = 0.01 Å−1 (length scale ~63 nm) indicates strong interactions between particles. At XC = 0.2, the low-q intensity had significantly decreased, and it gradually decreased further at higher XC. At XC = 0.6, the scattering curve had a decay of between q−2 and q−4, suggesting bicelle formation [25]. At values above q = 0.03 Å−1, the scattering curves were almost independent of the SL-ChEO10 mixing fraction.
As shown in the inset of Figure 3, the scattering curve at XC = 0.6 was successfully fitted by using the core-shell bicelle form factor model [28] and the Hayter-MSA structure factor model [35,36]. The representative structural parameters are shown in Figure 4. The disk diameter is larger while the thickness is smaller than the bicelles in the SL-Tween 80 system [11]. The maximum linear hydrocarbon chain length is described by Tanford [37] as (0.154 + 0.1265 n) nm, where n is the carbon number. The hydrophobic chains of SL are mainly C16 or C18, which give maximum lengths of 2.18 and 2.43 nm, respectively. The bilayer core thickness obtained was 4.4 nm, which is a reasonable value for twice the lengths of the C16 or C18 chains after allowing for slight shrinkage or interdigitation of the chains within the bilayer. Additionally, this indicates that the disc part of the bicelle was primarily composed of SL, and therefore that ChEO10 molecules were segregated to the rim. Based on this consideration, we can estimate the number of SL molecules per bicelle as follows: the area of the disc part of a bicelle (the blue circle in Figure 4) is obtained from a disc diameter of 34.8 nm is 950.7 nm2. The number of phospholipid molecules can then be estimated by dividing the total area of upper and lower surfaces of the disc part by the area occupied by phosphatidylcholine at the interface (0.711 nm2 [38]), giving a value of 2674 molecules. A slightly larger hydrophilic shell thickness at the rim than at the disc part would be reasonable if we consider longer head group ChEO10 molecules than SL.

3.3. Effect of Temperature and Concentration on Structure of Bicelles

The particle diameter distributions for the samples at XC = 0.6 and WS = 0.005 at different temperatures as obtained by DLS measurements are shown in Figure S1. Only particles with relatively small distributions were observed at temperatures up to 45 °C, while bimodal distributions with larger particle size distributions were observed at 55 °C. Particle diameters were also plotted against temperature at different WS (Figure 5). At WS = 0.001–0.005, the distributions were monomodal at temperatures of up to 45 °C and bimodal at 55 °C. However, when WS was 0.02 or higher, the temperature at which the transition occurred from a monomodal to a bimodal distribution declined as WS increased. In addition, the size of the larger particles increased with temperature.
SANS measurements were performed at 15–55 °C for a sample where XC = 0.6 and WS = 0.02. The scattering curves were almost identical from 15–35 °C, as shown in Figure S2, indicating that the shape, size, and interactions of the aggregates were unchanged. This is consistent with the absence of change in particle size in this temperature range according to the DLS measurements. At 45 and 55 °C, the intensity at around q = 0.02–0.03 Å−1 decreased slightly. After finishing the measurement at 55 °C, the sample was cooled to 25 °C and another SANS measurement was taken, with identical scattering curves being obtained at 25 °C before and after heating (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

As shown in Figure 5, the increases in WS and temperature resulted in the formation of large aggregates that differed from the bicelle. Phase behavior as a function of composition and temperature is presented in Figure 7. A similar aggregate map has been reported in the dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine (DMPC)-3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPSO) system [25], which shows the formation of ribbon structures and liposomes in addition to the bicelle. On the other hand, the present system shows much simpler phase behavior. Focusing on the effects of temperature and concentration on bicelle formation in the present system, large aggregates are formed by increasing both parameters. There are two possible explanations for the observation of large aggregates at high WS and temperatures. The first is structural transitions to different aggregated forms. The poly(oxyethylene) chain of ChEO10 dehydrates with both concentration and temperature, and hence the critical packing parameter of the molecule increases as the head area decreases. As a result, ChEO10 cannot form the rim of the bicelle, and the shape of the bicelle cannot be maintained. For example, transitions of bicelles into vesicles or ribbon structures have been reported in the literature [25]. The second explanation is the formation of clusters of bicelles that maintain their shape. In the former case, a large change in the SANS profile would be seen, but this was not observed in the result obtained at a high temperature, 55 °C, in Figure 6. In addition, temperature reversibility was seen in the SANS profile. Since the change in the SANS profile was small even at 55 °C, it is assumed that the shape of the bicelle was maintained throughout the measured temperature range, and that the large particles observed by the DLS measurements at high temperatures were clusters of bicelles. This observation shows the robustness of the SL-ChEO10 bicelles against temperature changes. It has been known that the gel-liquid crystal phase transition is disappeared by mixing cholesterol in phospholipid or surfactant membranes due to the phase transition to the liquid ordered (LO) phase, which is an intermediate phase between the liquid disordered (liquid crystalline) phase and the gel (crystalline) phase [39,40]. This results in the improved stability of liposomes or vesicles against temperature history since the LO phase has no phase transition in a wide temperature range. The ChEO10 used in the present system can also be mixed in the bilayer membrane of bicelles, not only in the rim of bicelles. Since the ChEO10 has a cholesteryl group in the hydrophobic part, the mixing of ChEO10 in the bilayer could induce the phase transition to the LO phase, hence the improved temperature robustness in the present system compared to the general bicellar systems composed of lipids only with hydrocarbon chains. It is known that the LO phase formation or the improvement of low-temperature molecular alignment in bicelles occurs by mixing cholesterol sulphate (CS) in phospholipid bicellar systems [9,41]. However, further studies are necessary for the confirmation of the phase transition in the present system to understand the mechanisms fully. The formation of the clustered bicelles was not convincing at high concentrations because we could not perform the SANS measurements, which also need further studies.

5. Conclusions

Disc-shaped bilayer dispersions known as bicelles were prepared by mixing hydrogenated soybean lecithin (SL) and poly(oxyethylene) cholesteryl ether (ChEO10) via the semi-spontaneous method using a solvent and an ultrasonicator. Dynamic light scattering and small-angle neutron scattering measurements showed that the aggregates changed structure from liposomes to bicelles as SL was replaced with ChEO10. The results presented herein demonstrate that bicelles can be obtained with low-cost materials and a simple preparation method. In addition, the SL-ChEO10 bicelles were found to reversibly form aggregates when the temperature was increased, but no transitions to other aggregated structures were observed. Therefore, the SL-ChEO10 bicelles were found to be stable against temperature. The temperature robustness should contribute to long-term storage stability of bicellar products.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/14/3066/s1, Figure S1: Particle diameter distributions of WS = 0.005 and XC = 0.6 at (a) 15 °C, (b) 25 °C, (c) 35 °C, (d) 45 °C, (e) 55 °C, Figure S2: SANS results at different temperatures for dispersions of the SL-ChEO10 system (XC = 0.6, WS = 0.02), Table S1: SANS fitting parameter.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A. (Kenji Aramaki) and Y.K.; data curation, K.A. (Keita Adachi), M.M., and J.M.; formal analysis, K.A. (Kenji Aramaki), M.M., and J.M.; funding acquisition, K.A. (Kenji Aramaki) and Y.K.; investigation, K.A. (Keita Adachi), M.M., and J.M.; methodology, J.M.; project administration, K.A. (Kenji Aramaki); resources, J.M., J.K.-K., D.T., and Y.K.; supervision, K.A. (Kenji Aramaki); validation, K.A. (Kenji Aramaki), K.A. (Keita Adachi), and M.M.; visualization, K.A. (Kenji Aramaki); writing—original draft, K.A. (Kenji Aramaki); writing—review and editing, J.M. and Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) for the awarded SANS beamtime (proposal number 6970).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Akbarzadeh, A.; Rezaei-Sadabady, R.; Davaran, S.; Joo, S.W.; Zarghami, N.; Hanifehpour, Y.; Samiei, M.d.; Kouhi, M.d.; Nejati-Koshki, K. Liposome: Classification, preparation, and applications Nanoscale. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 102. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lila, A.S.A.; Ishida, T. Liposomal Delivery Systems: Design Optimization and Current Applications. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ganta, S.; Devalapally, H.; Shahiwala, A.; Amiji, M. A review of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery. J. Control. Release 2008, 126, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kitagawa, S.; Kasamaki, M. Enhanced Delivery of Retinoic Acid to Skin by Cationic Liposomes. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 242–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Yasuhara, K.; Hayashi, H. Kikuchi Thermal Stability of Synthetic Lipid Bicelles Encompassed by Siloxane Surfaces as Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Nanodiscs. J. Chem. Lett. 2012, 41, 1223–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, H.; Su, K.; Guan, X.; Sublette, M.; Stark, R. Assessing the Size, Stability, and Utility of Isotropically Tumbling Bicelle Systems for Structural Biology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1798, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Björnerås, J.; Nilsson, M.; Mäler, L. Analysing DHPC/DMPC bicelles by diffusion NMR and multivariate decomposition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1848, 2910–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Glover, K.J.; Whiles, J.A.; Wu, G.H.; Yu, N.J.; Deems, R.; Struppe, J.O.; Stark, R.E.; Komives, E.A.; Vold, R.R. Structural Evaluation of Phospholipid Bicelles for Solution-State Studies of Membrane-Associated Biomolecules. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 2163–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rodríguez, G.; Cócera, M.; Rubio, L.; Alonso, C.; Pons, R.; Sandt, C.; Dumas, P.; López-Iglesias, C.; de la Maza, A.; López, O. Bicellar systems to modify the phase behaviour of skin stratum corneum lipids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 14523–14533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Viseu, M.I.; Correia, R.F.; Fernandes, A.C. Time evolution of the thermotropic behavior of spontaneous liposomes and disks of the DMPC–DTAC aqueous system. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 351, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Watanabe; Aramaki, Y.; Kadomatsu, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Konno, K. YPreparation of Bicelles Using the Semi-spontaneous. Method Chem. Lett. 2016, 45, 558–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ogunsola, O.A.; Kraeling, M.E.; Zhong, S.; Pochan, D.J.; Bronaugh, R.L.; Raghavan, S.R. Structural analysis of “flexible” liposome formulations: New insights into the skin-penetrating ability of soft nanostructures. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 10226–10232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lindholm, L.; Ariöz, C.; Jawurek, M.; Liebau, J.; Mäler, L.; Wieslander, Å.; Ballmoos, C.V.; Barth, A. Effect of lipid bilayer properties on the photocycle of green proteorhodopsin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1847, 698–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lee, S.C.; Bennett, B.C.; Hong, W.-X.; Fu, Y.; Baker, K.A.; Marcoux, J.; Robinson, C.V.; Ward, A.B.; Halpert, J.R.; Stevens, R.C.; et al. Steroid-based facial amphiphiles for stabilization and crystallization of membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E1203–E1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dürr, U.H.N.; Gildenberg, M.; Ramamoorthy, A. The Magic of Bicelles Lights up Membrane Protein Structure. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6054–6074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, P.; Lin, T.; Lin, T.; Yang, C.; Hu, Y.; Jeng, U. Packing DNA with disc-shaped bicelles. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 11542–11548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, P.-W.; Lin, T.-L.; Hu, Y.; Jeng, U.-S. Formation of divalent ion mediated anionic disc bicelle–DNA complexes. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 2313–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fernández, E.; Rodríguez, G.; Cócera, M.; Barbosa-Barros, L.; Alonso, C.; López-Iglesias, C.; Jawhari, T.; de la Maza, A.; López, O. Advanced lipid systems containing b-carotene: Stability under UV-vis radiation and application on porcine skin in vitro. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 18710–18721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saleem, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Petretic, A.; Gradinaru, C.C.; Macdonald, P.M. Single Lipid Bilayer Deposition on Polymer Surfaces Using Bicelles. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 1032–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garcia, R.M.; Song, Y.; Dorin, R.M.; Wang, H.; Moreno, A.M.; Jiang, Y.-B.; Tian, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Medforth, C.J.; Coker, E.N.; et al. Templated growth of platinum nanowheels using the inhomogeneous reaction environment of bicelles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 4846–4852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Holland, L.A.; Leigh, A.M. Bilayered phospholipid micelles and capillary electrophoresis: A new additive for electrokinetic chromatography. Electrophoresis 2003, 24, 2935–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Barbosa-Barros, L.; Barba, C.; Cocera, M. Effect of bicellar systems on skin properties. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 352, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rubio, L.; Alonso, C.; Rodriguez, G.; Cocera, M.; Barbosa-Barros, L.; Coderch, L.; de la Maza, A.; Parra, J.L.; Lopez, O. Bicellar systems as vehicle for the treatment of impaired skin. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 86, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, K.-C.; Huang, Z.-L.; Yang, Y.-M.; Chang, C.-H.; Chou, T.-H. Enhancement of catansome formation by means of cosolvent effect: Semi-spontaneous preparation method. Colloids. Surfaces A 2007, 302, 599–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, M.; Morales, H.H.; Katsaras, J.; Kucĕrka, N.; Yang, Y.; Macdonald, P.M.; Nieh, M.-P. Morphological Characterization of DMPC/CHAPSO Bicellar Mixtures: A Combined SANS and NMR Study. Langmuir 2013, 29, 15943–15957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wood, K.; Mata, J.P.; Garvey, C.J.; Wu, C.-M.; Hamilton, W.A.; Abbeywick, P.; Bartlett, D.; Bartsch, F.; Baxter, P.; Booth, N.; et al. QUOKKA the pinhole small-angle neutron scattering instrument at the OPAL Research Reactor Australia: Design performance operation and scientific highlights. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2018, 51, 294–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kline, S.R. ‘Quokka’—The small-angle neutron scattering instrument at OPAL. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2006, 39, 895–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Livsey, I. Reduction and analysis of SANS and USANS data using IGOR Pro. J. Chem. Soc. Fraday Trans. 1987, 83, 1445–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. SasView for Small Angle Scattering Analysis. Available online: http://www.sasview.org/ (accessed on 27 February 2020).
  30. Sato, T.; Hossain, M.d.K.; Acharya, D.P.; Glatter, O.; Chiba, A.; Kunieda, H. Phase Behavior and Self-Organized Structures in Water/Poly(oxyethylene) Cholesteryl Ether Systems. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 12927–12939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Danino, D.; Abezgauz, L.; Portnaya, I.; Dan, N. From Discs to Ribbons Networks: The Second Critical Micelle Concentration in Nonionic Sterol Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 1434–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, Y.; Xia, Y.; Nieh, M.-P. The effects of temperature, salinity, concentration and PEGylated lipid on the spontaneous nanostructures of bicellar mixtures. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1838, 1871–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Aramaki, K.; Iwata, C.; Mata, J.; Maehara, T.; Aburano, D.; Sakanishi, Y.; Kitao, K. One-step formulation of nonionic surfactant bicelles (NSBs) by a double-tailed polyglycerol-type nonionic surfactant. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 23802–23808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Davies, T.S.; Ketner, A.M.; Raghavan, S.R. Self-Assembly of Surfactant Vesicles that Transform into Viscoelastic Wormlike Micelles upon Heating. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6669–6675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hayter, J.B.; Penfold, J. An analytic structure factor for macroion solutions. Mol. Phys. 1981, 42, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hansen, J.P.; Hayter, J.B. A rescaled MSA structure factor for dilute charged colloidal dispersions. Mol. Phys. 1982, 46, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tanford, C. Micelle shape and size. J. Phys. Chem. 1972, 76, 3020–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Carnie, S.; Israelachvili, J.N.; Pailthorpe, B.A. Lipid packing and transbilayer asymmetries of mixed lipid vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1979, 554, 340–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ipsen, J.H.; Karlström, G.; Mouritsen, O.G.; Wennerström, H.; Zuckermann, M.J. Phase equilibria in the phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1987, 905, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aramaki, K.; Yamada, J.; Tsukijima, Y.; Maehara, T.; Aburano, D.; Sakanishi, Y.; Kitao, K. Formation of bilayer membrane and niosomes by double-tailed polyglyceryl-type nonionic surfactant. Langmuir 2015, 31, 10664–10671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shapiro, R.A.; Brindley, A.J.; Martin, R.W. Thermal Stabilization of DMPC/DHPC Bicelles by Addition of Cholesterol Sulfate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 132, 11406–11407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Appearance of soybean lecithin (SL)-ChEO10 samples (WS = 0.02) at different XC.
Figure 1. Appearance of soybean lecithin (SL)-ChEO10 samples (WS = 0.02) at different XC.
Materials 13 03066 g001
Figure 2. Intensity-based particle size distributions of dispersions of the SL-ChEO10 system (WS = 0.02) at different XC at 25 °C. (a) XC = 0; (b) XC = 0.1; (c) XC = 0.4; (d) XC = 0.5; (e) XC = 0.6; (f) XC = 1.
Figure 2. Intensity-based particle size distributions of dispersions of the SL-ChEO10 system (WS = 0.02) at different XC at 25 °C. (a) XC = 0; (b) XC = 0.1; (c) XC = 0.4; (d) XC = 0.5; (e) XC = 0.6; (f) XC = 1.
Materials 13 03066 g002
Figure 3. Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) results at 25 °C for dispersions of the SL-ChEO10 system (WS = 0.02) at different mixing fractions, XC. Inset shows a best fit (solid line) of the core-shell bicelle model to the scattering curve for XC = 0.6 (fitting parameters are shown in Table S1).
Figure 3. Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) results at 25 °C for dispersions of the SL-ChEO10 system (WS = 0.02) at different mixing fractions, XC. Inset shows a best fit (solid line) of the core-shell bicelle model to the scattering curve for XC = 0.6 (fitting parameters are shown in Table S1).
Materials 13 03066 g003
Figure 4. Structure of a bicelle in the SL-ChEO10 system (WS = 0.02) at XC = 0.6 and at 25 °C.
Figure 4. Structure of a bicelle in the SL-ChEO10 system (WS = 0.02) at XC = 0.6 and at 25 °C.
Materials 13 03066 g004
Figure 5. Temperature dependence of particle size when WS = (a) 0.001, (b) 0.0025, (c) 0.005, (d) 0.02, (e) 0.05, and (f) 0.1.
Figure 5. Temperature dependence of particle size when WS = (a) 0.001, (b) 0.0025, (c) 0.005, (d) 0.02, (e) 0.05, and (f) 0.1.
Materials 13 03066 g005
Figure 6. SANS results at 25 °C and 55 °C for dispersions of the SL-ChEO10 system (XC = 0.6, WS = 0.02). The “25 °C-return” indicates the measurement taken at 25 °C after cooling from 55 °C.
Figure 6. SANS results at 25 °C and 55 °C for dispersions of the SL-ChEO10 system (XC = 0.6, WS = 0.02). The “25 °C-return” indicates the measurement taken at 25 °C after cooling from 55 °C.
Materials 13 03066 g006
Figure 7. Aggregate map in the SL-ChEO10 system (XC = 0.6).
Figure 7. Aggregate map in the SL-ChEO10 system (XC = 0.6).
Materials 13 03066 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aramaki, K.; Adachi, K.; Maeda, M.; Mata, J.; Kamimoto-Kuroki, J.; Tsukamoto, D.; Konno, Y. Formulation of Bicelles Based on Lecithin-Nonionic Surfactant Mixtures. Materials 2020, 13, 3066. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143066

AMA Style

Aramaki K, Adachi K, Maeda M, Mata J, Kamimoto-Kuroki J, Tsukamoto D, Konno Y. Formulation of Bicelles Based on Lecithin-Nonionic Surfactant Mixtures. Materials. 2020; 13(14):3066. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aramaki, Kenji, Keita Adachi, Miho Maeda, Jitendra Mata, Junko Kamimoto-Kuroki, Daisuke Tsukamoto, and Yoshikazu Konno. 2020. "Formulation of Bicelles Based on Lecithin-Nonionic Surfactant Mixtures" Materials 13, no. 14: 3066. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop