Next Article in Journal
Forms of Damage of Bricks Subjected to Cyclic Freezing and Thawing in Actual Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of the Suitability of Different Types of Slag and Its Influence on the Quality of Green Grouts Obtained by Partial Replacement of Cement
Previous Article in Journal
Dealing with the Effect of Air in Fluid Structure Interaction by Coupled SPH-FEM Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Immobilization of Simulated Radioactive Soil Waste Using Self-Propagating Synthesized Gd2Ti2O7 Pyrochlore Matrix

1
State Key Laboratory of Environment-friendly Energy Materials, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
2
Sichuan Civil-Military Integration Institute, Mianyang 621010, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
4
Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(7), 1163; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071163
Submission received: 22 February 2019 / Revised: 6 April 2019 / Accepted: 8 April 2019 / Published: 10 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Bioderived Composites from Wastes)

Abstract

:
A rapid and effective method is necessary in the disposal of severely radioactive contaminated soil waste. Simulated Ce-bearing radioactive soil waste was immobilized by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) within 5 min in this study. The main work includes the rapid synthesis of soil waste forms, the analysis of phase composition, microstructure and chemical durability. These results show that the simulated nuclide Ce was successfully immobilized into the pyrochlore-rich waste matrice, whose main phases are SiO2, pyrochlore (Gd2Ti2O7) and Cu. The normalized leaching rates of Si and Na on the 42nd day are 1.86 × 10−3 and 1.63 × 10−2 g·m−2·d−1, respectively. And the normalized leaching rate of Ce also remains at low level (10−5–10−6 g·m−2·d−1) within 42 days.

1. Introduction

In recent years, nuclear power has been developed rapidly in the world due to its advantages of high efficiency, economy and low carbon emissions. However, the harm caused by the byproduction of nuclear energy, mainly nuclear wastes, can hardly be ignored, especially high-level radioactive waste (HLW) [1]. The radioactive nuclides in HLW, such as 137Cs, 90Sr, 239Pu, 235U, etc., possess the characteristics of long half-life, high toxicity, and high heat generation [2,3]. When these radionuclides enter the soil, the situation becomes more complicated because the presence of soil will increase the cost of disposal [4,5]. Furthermore, soil contaminated by highly radioactive nuclides may pose a long-term threat to organisms due to ecological cycling [6,7].
For radioactive contaminated soil, sand is an inseparable main substance and must be cured together with radionuclides. At present, there are mainly physical landfill and bioremediation methods for the treatment of radioactive contaminated soil. The physical landfill is a time-consuming project, which will destroy the ecosystem of disposal area. At the same time, it may cause further pollution due to leakage during transportation [8]. The bioremediation method requires a long period of restoration, and the growth of plants is limited by climate and geology [9]. In addition to the above methods, vitrification is an effective technology for the immobilization of long half-life wastes, especially for soil wastes contaminated by high radioactive nuclides [10,11]. Particularly, borosilicate glass is the most widely studied and utilized vitrified waste form in the world because of its good radiation resistance, corrosion resistance, and chemical stability [12]. Regrettably, the glass matrice may decompose in geological repositories due to high temperature and high pressure [13,14]. Furthermore, the relatively low thermal stability of vitrified waste forms is also a potential limitation [15]. Compared with glass matrice, ceramic solidified bodies have the advantages of low expansion rate, excellent mechanical properties, and good chemical stability. Subsequently, Synroc has been proposed as a potential alternative host matrix for HLW immobilization based on the isomorphism substitution theory [16,17,18,19,20].
Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) is a technology that uses the energy released by exothermic redox reactions to synthesize the final products [21,22,23]. SHS technology possesses certain technical and cost advantages in the treatment of contaminated soil. According to the characteristics of radionuclides, the composition and proportion of a SHS reaction system can be well designed. In addition, quick pressing (QP) is also introduced to obtain compact samples [24]. Zirconolite-rich matrice and titanate-pyrochlore with excellent chemical durability can also be prepared by SHS/QP [25,26,27,28,29,30]. SHS/QP technology can synthesize high density ceramic matrix in several minutes, which was considered as a potential method to deal with environmental issues. In this study, Gd2Ti2O7 pyrochlore waste matrix was synthesized by SHS for the disposal of simulated radioactive soil waste. Ten wt.% CeO2 was regarded as a simulate of tetravalent actinide [31]. Silica sand was utilized as the heat insulation material and pressure transfer medium during the SHS/QP process. A series of characterizations were carried out to understand the solidifying mechanism of obtained waste forms. In addition, the aqueous durability was evaluated using the standard Product Consistency Test (PCT) method [32].

2. Materials and Methods

The composition of original soil is listed in Table 1. The soil (200 meshes) and simulated radionuclide Ce4+ (CeO2, Aladdin Industrial Inc., purity ≥ 99.99%)) were mixed with the weight ratio of 9:1. The SHS reaction was prepared according to the following chemical equation [28]:
4CuO + Gd2O3 + 2Ti = Gd2Ti2O7 + 4Cu
The raw materials of CuO, Gd2O3, and Ti (purity ≥ 99.9 wt.%) were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Inc. (Shanghai, China). Different contents of simulated radioactive soil wastes (0 wt.%, 5 wt.%, 10 wt.%, 15 wt.%, 20 wt.%, 25 wt.%) were mixed with the raw materials of SHS reaction (labelled as Cu-0, Cu-5, Cu-10, Cu-15, Cu-20, and Cu-25, respectively). Pretreatment of powder samples is similar as the previous study [28].
The SHS/QP process is shown in Figure 1. The self-propagating combustion reactions were ignited by tungsten wire, which was located at one side with tight contact of the green body and heated by a direct current of about 50 A. The SHS reactants were ignited at high temperature, and the combustion wave automatically propagated to the unreacted region until the reaction’s completion. Before densification, the W/Re 5/26 thermocouple was placed in the center of the samples to measure the reaction temperature of Cu-0 to Cu-25 specimens. The unpressurized samples were crushed into fine powders for X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD; X’Pert PRO, PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands).
For densification, the ignited sample was compressed by 50 MPa with 60 s dwelling time after proper combustion delay time. The SHS-ed compact sample was cut and polished to characterize the microstructure and elemental distribution using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM; Zeiss Ultra-55, Oberkochen, Germany) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, ULTRA 55, ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany). The chemical durability of waste form was tested by the Product Consistency Test (PCT) standard. The concentrations of Na and Si in leachate were determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis (iCPA 6500, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA), while that of Ce was obtained by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis using an Agilent 7700× spectrometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The normalized release rates were calculated as the following formula:
N R i   =   C i · V f i · S A · t
where Ci is the concentration of element i in the solution, V is the volume of the leachate (m3), SA is the surface area of powder specimen (m2), fi is the mass fraction of element i in the sample (wt.%) and t is the leaching duration (d). The SA/V ratio is about 2000 m−1, which is derived from the standard test method for The Product Consistency Test (ASTM c 1285-02) [32]. In this standard, the waste particles are assumed to be spherical and the average particle diameter is 1.12 × 10−4 m for −100 (0.149 mm) to +200 (0.074 mm) meshes particles. Therefore, the average particle area and volume are calculated as 3.90 × 10−8 m2 and 7.25 × 10−13 m3, respectively. The average particle mass is calculated to be 1.96 × 10−6 g. Thus, there are 1 g/1.96 × 10−6 g = 5.11 × 105 particles in 1 g powder waste form with −100 to +200 meshes particles. Thus, the total surface area of 1 g powder with −100 to +200 meshes particles is calculated to be 1.99 × 10−2 m2. As long as the density and particle size of waste form remain comparable during the leaching tests, this parameter will remain at a constant value and doesn’t need to be calculated every time.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Temperature and Powder XRD Analysis

The combustion process of the designed SHS reaction takes about 10 s after tungsten wire ignition. The center temperature of all samples in SHS reactions are measured and depicted in Figure 2. With the increment of soil wastes, the center temperatures of Cu-0, Cu-5, Cu-10, Cu-15, Cu-20, and Cu-25 samples decrease from 1679 to 1052 °C in Figure 2. The center temperature of the Cu-0 sample is the highest at 1679 °C, while the Cu-25 sample with the maximum soil content exhibits the lowest temperature at 1052 °C. Apparently, the increase of soil wastes led to the decrease of SHS reaction temperature.
The XRD patterns in Figure 3 show that the specimens with soil waste (Cu-5 to Cu-25 samples) are composed of Cu, SiO2, and Gd2Ti2O7 (PDF No. 23-0259), while the sample without soil waste only contains Gd2Ti2O7 pyrochlore. From Cu-5 to Cu-25 specimens, the main phase of all samples is Gd2Ti2O7 pyrochlore, demonstrating that the increase of soil wastes does not change the phase composition. In Figure 3, the content of Cu in these SHS-ed samples increases with the increment of soil content, but Cu is hardly found in the Cu-0 sample. Because the temperature of Cu-0 reaction is the highest, the Cu melts and condenses into bulky grains during the high temperature reaction. With the decrease of reaction temperature, the size of copper particles decreases. Meanwhile, all SHS-ed samples were ground into powder for XRD testing, where the granulated Cu was sifted out directly. By contrast, the content change of SiO2 has no regular pattern, which may be affected by the heat insulator silica sand. However, unknown phases appear in the Cu-25 sample, which may be related with the large amount of simulated radioactive soil. Therefore, the Cu-20 specimen was selected for further analysis.

3.2. Raman Analysis and Microstructure Characterization

Raman spectroscopy was carried out to further analyze the crystal structure and internal bonds of pyrochlore. Raman spectroscopy is an important technique, especially in systems where oxygen displacement induces structure transformation, such as distinguishing fluorite from pyrochlore in pyrochlore ceramics [33]. Different from the A2B2O7 fluorite structure with only one F2g vibration mode, the pyrochlore structure contains six Raman modes (A1g, Eg, and 4F2g). Typical wavenumbers of pyrochlore phase at room temperature are 520 cm−1 (A1g), 330 cm−1 (Eg), and 200, 310, 450, 580 cm−1 (4F2g) [33,34]. For Ti-pyrochlore, the most prominent characteristic of Raman spectra are the intensive band at 320 cm−1 and the A1g band at 520 cm−1. The band around 320 cm−1 includes Eg + F2g modes with very close frequency, which is mostly attributed to O–A–O bond vibration. The A1g band at 520 cm−1 is believed to be related to A–O stretching [35,36].
The Raman spectra of Cu-0, Cu-10, and Cu-20 samples are shown in Figure 4. The six Raman active vibration modes (A1g, Eg and 4F2g) are explicitly assigned. In addition, the Si–O stretching vibration at 1100 cm−1 and the Si–O–Si symmetric bending vibration near 700 cm−1 are also included. The Raman spectra peaks of three specimens are similar except for some changes in strength, which means the pyrochlore structure of Gd2Ti2O7 remains unchanged. In particular, the characteristic F2g (200 cm−1 and 455 cm−1) bands are well defined in the Cu-0 specimen. On the contrary, the vibration intensity of Eg + F2g modes (320 cm−1) and A1g mode (520 cm−1) increase significantly in the Cu-10 and Cu-20 samples. It is evident that this drastic change is due to the addition of simulated radioactive soil. On the basis of previous literatures [33,34,35,36], we preliminarily speculate that some ions in the simulated radioactive soil (possibly containing Ce) occupy the A and B sites of pyrochlore structure, resulting in steep changes of oxygen ions’ environment and peak intensity of Raman spectra.
As shown in Figure 5, the microstructure and elemental distribution of the compact Cu-20 specimen are exhibited in the SEM and elemental mapping images. It can be found that the pores mainly exist in the ceramic matrix rather than the copper phase. It may be argued that the melting point of copper (1083.4 °C) is lower than the combustion temperature of the Cu-20 sample. Therefore, gas can easily be discharged from the copper into the ceramic matrix. The Cu-20 sample consists of four phases, labeled as A, B, C, D in Figure 5a. According to Figure 5b–f and XRD analysis, we speculate that the A region is copper, the B region should be Gd2Ti2O7, the C region is SiO2, and the D region represents TiO2. The impurity TiO2 phase is produced from the raw materials of the reaction system and the original soil. However, no TiO2 exists in the previous XRD result of Cu-20. It is possible that the diffraction peaks of TiO2 are not obvious because of its low content.
The EDX elemental spotting analysis of the Cu-20 sample is presented in Figure 6. The EDX spotting image of “B” phase in Figure 6a is presented in Figure 6b. Combined with the XRD and EDX mapping results, the existence of Gd, Ti, Ce, and O in the EDX spotting spectra indicates that the “B” phase is Ce doped Gd2Ti2O7 pyrochlore phase. The average elemental quantities are acquired by taking at least five points of “A” area as listed in the inserted table of Figure 6b, which results in the chemical formulation of Gd1.96Ti1.94Ce0.09O7. Meanwhile, a small amount of Ce is also found in the soil phase according to Figure 6c, indicating that the simulated nuclide Ce of radioactive soil waste can exist in both the pyrochlore phase and soil phase. At the same time, most of the elements in original soil are retained in the soil phase. Figure 6d shows that only Ti and O are present in the D region, which confirms that the D phase is TiO2.

3.3. Chemical Durability Measurement by PCT Leaching Test

The leaching performance of nuclear waste forms is a significant indicator for estimating the chemical stability [37]. The 1–42 days normalized elemental leaching rates of Si, Na, and Ce of the Cu-20 sample are depicted in Figure 7. With the extension of soaking time, the normalized leaching rates of Na and Si show a downward trend from 1 to 14 days. Then, NRNa and NRSi exhibit slight ascension within 14–28 days, and finally both of them reach the lowest values in 42 days. The day 1 and day 42 NRSi values are 2.04 × 10−2 and 1.86 × 10−3 g·m−2·d−1, which represent excellent stability. The lowest value of NRNa is 1.63 × 10−2 g·m−2·d−1 after 42 days of leaching. This rule is not applicable for Ce, whose leaching rate has no definite regulation. The NRCe varies from 7.20 × 10−5 g·m−2·d−1 of 42 days to 2.20 × 10−6 g·m−2·d−1 of 7 days, which is about five orders of magnitude lower than the NRNa values. The NRce values vary irregularly but remain at a low level (10−5–10−6 g·m−2·d−1). Compared with our previous research results [38], the leaching rate of Si is slightly lower in this study. The NRNa of the Cu-20 sample is similar to that of borosilicate glass-ceramics [39]. Nevertheless, the leaching performance of simulated nuclide in Cu-20 sample is significantly lower than that of typical vitreous products [40].

4. Conclusions

In summary, a series of Gd2Ti2O7-based waste forms containing 5–25 wt.% simulated radioactive contaminated soil have been successfully synthesized by SHS in 5 min. The obtained products are multiphase composite materials composed of SiO2, Gd2Ti2O7, and Cu. Furthermore, the simulated nuclide Ce exists in pyrochlore and soil phases simultaneously, which indicates that Ce migrates partly from soil to pyrochlore phase during the SHS reaction. The solidified body of Cu-20 sample exhibits high stability. The 42 days NRSi and NRNa are as low as 1.86 × 10−3 and 1.63 × 10−2 g·m−2·d−1, respectively. And the 1–42 days NRCe values also remain at a low level (10−5–10−6 g·m−2·d−1). Based on the analysis of phase composition, microstructure, and chemical durability, the application potential of SHS technology in the rapid disposal of radioactive soil wastes is revealed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.Z., B.L. and H.Z.; Methodology, K.Z. and J.X.; Formal Analysis, J.X., K.X., Z.H. and W.Z.; Investigation, J.X., W.L., D.X. and Z.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.X.; Writing—Review & Editing, K.Z. and B.L.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51672228), the Project of State Key Laboratory of Environment-friendly Energy Materials (Southwest University of Science and Technology, No. 16kffk05 and 17FKSY0104) and Science Development Foundation of China Academy of Engineering Physics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency. Design and Operation of High Level Waste, Vitrification and Storage Facility (Technical Report Series No. 176); IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ojovan, M.I.; Lee, W.E. An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilization; Elsevier Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 213–267. [Google Scholar]
  3. Caurant, D.; Loiseau, P.; Majérus, O.; Aubin-Chevaldonnet, V.; Bardez, I.; Quintas, A. Glasses, Glass-Ceramics and Ceramics for Immobilization of Highly Radioactive Nuclear Wastes; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhu, Y.G.; Shaw, G. Soil contamination with radionuclides and potential remediation. Chemosphere 2000, 41, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Mao, X.H.; Qin, Z.G.; Yuan, X.N.; Wang, C.M.; Cai, X.N.; Zhao, W.X.; Zhao, K.; Yang, P.; Fan, X.L. Immobilization of simulated radioactive soil waste containing cerium by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis. J. Nucl. Mater. 2013, 443, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gavrilescu, M.; Pavel, L.V.; Cretescu, I. Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 475–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yasunari, T.J.; Stohl, A.; Hayano, R.S.; Burkhart, J.F.; Eckhardt, S.; Yasunari, T. Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19530–19534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Xie, Y.; Wu, T.; Shi, Z.K.; Zhang, D. A very low level radioactive waste landfill soil characteristics and properties of strontium block. Chem. Res. Appl. 2013, 25, 558–562. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lloyd, J.R.; Renshaw, J.C. Bioremediation of radioactive waste: Radionuclide-microbe interactions in laboratory and field-scale studies. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2005, 16, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, S.; Ding, Y.; Lu, X.R.; Mao, X.L.; Song, M.X. Rapid and efficient disposal of radioactive contaminated soil using microwave sintering method. Mater. Lett. 2016, 175, 165–168. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, S.; Shu, X.Y.; Chen, S.Z.; Yang, H.M.; Hou, C.X.; Mao, X.L.; Chi, F.T.; Song, M.X.; Lu, X.R. Rapid immobilization of simulated radioactive soil waste by microwave sintering. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 337, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Gin, S.; Abdelouas, A.; Criscenti, L.J.; Ebert, W.L. An international initiative on long-term behavior of high-level nuclear waste glass. Mater. Today 2013, 16, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mccarthy, G.J.; Ebert, W.L.; Roy, R.; Scheetz, B.E. Interactions between nuclear waste and surrounding rock. Nature 1978, 273, 216–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Loiseau, P.; Caurant, D.; Majerus, O.; Baffier, N.; Fillet, C. Crystallization study of (TiO2, ZrO2)-rich SiO2-Al2O3-CaO glasses. Part II. Surface and internal crystallization processes investigated by differential thermal analysis (DTA). J. Mater. Sci. 2003, 38, 843–852. [Google Scholar]
  15. Caurant, D.; Majérus, O.; Loiseau, P.; Bardez, I.; Baffier, N.; Dussossoy, J.L. Crystallization of neodymium-rich phases in silicate glasses developed for nuclear waste immobilization. J. Nucl. Mater. 2006, 354, 143–162. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ringwood, A.E.; Kesson, S.E.; Ware, N.G.; Hibberson, W.; Major, A. Immobilization of high level nuclear reactor wastes in SYNROC. Nature 1979, 278, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Franck, P.; John, M.H.; Urs, S. The current state and future of accessory mineral research. Chem. Geol. 2002, 191, 3–24. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vance, E.R. Development of ceramic waste forms for high-level nuclear waste over the last 30 years. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2006, 985, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Weber, W.J.; Navrotsky, A.; Stefanovsky, S.; Vance, E.R.; Vernaz, E. Materials science of high-level nuclear waste immobilization. MRS Bull. 2009, 34, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, K.B.; Yin, D.; Han, P.W.; Zhang, H.B. Two-step synthesis of zirconolite-rich ceramic waste matrice and its physicochemical properties. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2018, 15, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muthuraman, M.; Dhas, N.A.; Patil, K.C. Combustion synthesis of oxide materials for nuclear waste immobilization. Bull. Mater. Sci. 1994, 17, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muthuraman, M.; Patil, K.C.; Senbagaraman, S.; Umarji, A.M. Sintering, microstructure and dilatometric studies of combustion synthesized Synroc phases. Mater. Res. Bull. 1996, 31, 1375–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, Z.S.; Zhang, K.B.; Xue, J.L.; Zhao, W.W.; Zhang, H.B. Self-propagating chemical furnace synthesis of nanograin Gd2Zr2O7 ceramic and its aqueous durability. J. Nucl. Mater. 2018, 512, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, K.B.; Wen, G.J.; Zhang, H.B.; Teng, Y.C. Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of Y2Ti2O7 pyrochlore and its aqueous durability. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015, 465, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, K.B.; He, Z.S.; Peng, L.; Zhang, H.B.; Lu, X.R. Self-propagating synthesis of Y2-xNdxTi2O7 pyrochlore and its aqueous durability as nuclear waste form. Scripta. Mater. 2018, 146, 300–303. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, K.B.; He, Z.S.; Xue, J.L.; Zhao, W.W.; Zhang, H.B. Self-propagating synthesis of Y2-xNdxTi2O7 pyrochlores using CuO as the oxidant and its characterizations as waste form. J. Nucl. Mater. 2018, 507, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, K.B.; Yin, D.; Peng, L.; Wu, J.J. Self-propagating synthesis and CeO2 immobilization of zirconolite-rich composites using CuO as the oxidant. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 1415–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peng, L.; Zhang, K.B.; Yin, D.; Wu, J.J.; He, S.H.; He, H.M. Self-propagating synthesis, mechanical property and aqueous durability of Gd2Ti2O7 pyrochlore. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18907–18913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, L.; Zhang, K.B.; He, Z.S.; Yin, D.; Xue, J.L.; Xu, C.; Zhang, H.B. Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of ZrO2 incorporated Gd2Ti2O7 pyrochlore. J. Adv. Ceram. 2018, 7, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, Z.S.; Zhang, K.B.; Peng, L.; Zhao, W.W.; Xue, J.L.; Zhang, H.B. Self-propagating plus quick pressing synthesis and characterizations of Gd2-xNdxTi1.3Zr0.7O7 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1.4) pyrochlores. J. Nucl. Mater. 2018, 504, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, H.S.; Joung, C.Y.; Lee, B.H.; Oh, J.Y.; Koo, Y.H.; Heimgartner, P. Applicability of CeO2 as a surrogate for PuO2 in a MOX fuel development. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 378, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. ASTM Committee. Standard Test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear, Hazardous, and Mixed Waste Glasses and Multiphase Glass Ceramics: The Product Consistency Test (PCT); ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ma̧czka, M.; Hanuza, J.; Hermanowicz, K.; Fuentes, A.F.; Matsuhira, K.; Hiroi, Z. Temperature-dependent Raman scattering studies of the geometrically frustrated pyrochlores Dy2Ti2O7, Gd2Ti2O7 and Er2Ti2O7. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2008, 39, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ma̧czka, M.; Sanjuán, M.L.; Fuentes, A.F.; Macalik, L.; Hanuza, J.; Matsuhira, K.; Hiroi, Z. Temperature-dependent studies of the geometrically frustrated pyrochlores Ho2Ti2O7 and Dy2Ti2O7. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 214437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, F.X.; Manoun, B.; Saxena, S.K. Pressure-induced order-disorder transitions in pyrochlore RE2Ti2O7 (RE = Y, Gd). Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 2773–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sanjuán, M.L.; Guglieri, C.; DíazMoreno, S.; Aquilanti, G.; Fuentes, A.F.; Olivi, L.; Chaboy, J. Raman and X-ray absorption spectroscopy study of the phase evolution induced by mechanical milling and thermal treatments in R2Ti2O7 pyrochlores. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 104207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.; Stewart, M.W.A.; Li, H.; Carter, M.L.; Vance, E.R.; Moricca, S. Zirconolit-rich titanate ceramics for immobilisation of actinides-Waste form/HIP can interactions and chemical durability. J. Nucl. Mater. 2009, 395, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xue, J.L.; Zhang, K.B.; He, Z.H.; Zhao, W.W.; Li, W.W.; Xie, D.Y.; Zhang, H.B. Rapid disposal of simulated Ce-bearing radioactive soil waste using self-propagating synthesized zirconolite-rich waste matrice. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 14534–14540. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu, L.; Li, Y.X.; Teng, Y.C.; Meng, G.L. Preparation and characterization of borosilicate glass-ceramics containing zirconolite and titanite crystalline phases. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2013, 380, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ojovan, M.I.; Lee, W.E. Glassy Wasteforms for Nuclear Waste Immobilization. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2011, 42, 837–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagrammatic sketch of the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis/quick pressing (SHS/QP) process.
Figure 1. Diagrammatic sketch of the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis/quick pressing (SHS/QP) process.
Materials 12 01163 g001
Figure 2. Real temperature curves of all samples during SHS reaction.
Figure 2. Real temperature curves of all samples during SHS reaction.
Materials 12 01163 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of all SHS-ed samples.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of all SHS-ed samples.
Materials 12 01163 g003
Figure 4. Raman spectra of the Cu-0, Cu-10, and Cu-20 samples.
Figure 4. Raman spectra of the Cu-0, Cu-10, and Cu-20 samples.
Materials 12 01163 g004
Figure 5. (a) SEM image of Cu-20 specimen, and element mapping images of (b) O, (c) Si, (d) Ti, (e) Cu, (f) Gd.
Figure 5. (a) SEM image of Cu-20 specimen, and element mapping images of (b) O, (c) Si, (d) Ti, (e) Cu, (f) Gd.
Materials 12 01163 g005
Figure 6. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) elemental spotting analysis: (a) Representative SEM image of the Cu-20 sample, (b) EDX spectrum and elemental composition of the labeled “B” area in (a), (c) EDX spectrum of region C in (a), (d) EDX spectrum of region D in (a).
Figure 6. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) elemental spotting analysis: (a) Representative SEM image of the Cu-20 sample, (b) EDX spectrum and elemental composition of the labeled “B” area in (a), (c) EDX spectrum of region C in (a), (d) EDX spectrum of region D in (a).
Materials 12 01163 g006
Figure 7. Normalized leaching rates of Si, Na, and Ce from day 1–42.
Figure 7. Normalized leaching rates of Si, Na, and Ce from day 1–42.
Materials 12 01163 g007
Table 1. Soil composition in this study.
Table 1. Soil composition in this study.
CompositionSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOK2OMgONa2OTiO2
Content (wt.%)66.3216.575.874.672.861.660.810.74

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, J.; Zhang, K.; He, Z.; Zhao, W.; Li, W.; Xie, D.; Luo, B.; Xu, K.; Zhang, H. Rapid Immobilization of Simulated Radioactive Soil Waste Using Self-Propagating Synthesized Gd2Ti2O7 Pyrochlore Matrix. Materials 2019, 12, 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071163

AMA Style

Xue J, Zhang K, He Z, Zhao W, Li W, Xie D, Luo B, Xu K, Zhang H. Rapid Immobilization of Simulated Radioactive Soil Waste Using Self-Propagating Synthesized Gd2Ti2O7 Pyrochlore Matrix. Materials. 2019; 12(7):1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Jiali, Kuibao Zhang, Zongsheng He, Wenwen Zhao, Weiwei Li, Dayan Xie, Baozhu Luo, Kai Xu, and Haibin Zhang. 2019. "Rapid Immobilization of Simulated Radioactive Soil Waste Using Self-Propagating Synthesized Gd2Ti2O7 Pyrochlore Matrix" Materials 12, no. 7: 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop