Next Article in Journal
An X-ray Tomographic Study of Rechargeable Zn/MnO2 Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Delphi Prospection on Additive Manufacturing in 2030: Implications for Education and Employment in Spain
Previous Article in Journal
Silver-Based Chemical Device as an Adjunct of Domestic Oral Hygiene: A Study on Periodontal Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of a New Dry Drill-Milling Process of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer Laminates
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Materials 2018, 11(8), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081484

Some Considerations about the Use of Contact and Confocal Microscopy Methods in Surface Texture Measurement

1
Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Industrial Design Engineering, ETS Ingeniería y Diseño Industrial, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ronda de Valencia, 3, 28012 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Aerospace Materials and Production, ETSI Aeronáutica y del Espacio, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Plaza del Cardenal Cisneros, 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Engineering Surveying and Cartography, ETSI en Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Sur, Carretera de Valencia, Km 7, 28031 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 July 2018 / Revised: 17 August 2018 / Accepted: 18 August 2018 / Published: 20 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Special Issue of the Manufacturing Engineering Society (MES))
Full-Text   |   PDF [3828 KB, uploaded 21 August 2018]   |  

Abstract

Surface metrology employs various measurement techniques, among which there has been an increase of noteworthy research into non-contact optical and contact stylus methods. However, some deeper considerations about their differentiation and compatibility are still lacking and necessary. This work compares the measurement characteristics of the confocal microscope with the portable stylus profilometer instrumentation, from a metrological point of view (measurement precision and accuracy, and complexity of algorithms for data processing) and an operational view (measuring ranges, measurement speed, environmental and operational requirements, and cost). Mathematical models and algorithms for roughness parameters calculation and their associated uncertainties evaluation are developed and validated. The experimental results demonstrate that the stylus profilometer presents the most reliable measurement with the highest measurement speed and the least complex algorithms, while the image confocal method takes advantage of higher vertical and horizontal resolution when compared with the employed stylus profilometer. View Full-Text
Keywords: surface texture; contact measurement; optical measurement surface texture; contact measurement; optical measurement
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Caja García, J.; Sanz Lobera, A.; Maresca, P.; Fernández Pareja, T.; Wang, C. Some Considerations about the Use of Contact and Confocal Microscopy Methods in Surface Texture Measurement. Materials 2018, 11, 1484.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Materials EISSN 1996-1944 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top