Next Article in Journal
Mie-Metamaterials-Based Thermal Emitter for Near-Field Thermophotovoltaic Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Incorporation of Collagen in Calcium Phosphate Cements for Controlling Osseointegration
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of Cationic MOFs with Mobile Anions by Anion Stripping to Remove 2,4-D from Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures: Material Characterization and In Vivo Behavior
Open AccessReview

Metallic Biomaterials: Current Challenges and Opportunities

1
School of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
2
CSIRO-QUT Joint Sustainable Processes and Devices Laboratory, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, P.O. Box 218, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia
3
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
4
College of Science and Engineering, Technology and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(8), 884; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10080884
Received: 27 April 2017 / Revised: 14 July 2017 / Accepted: 25 July 2017 / Published: 31 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocompatibility of Materials)
Metallic biomaterials are engineered systems designed to provide internal support to biological tissues and they are being used largely in joint replacements, dental implants, orthopaedic fixations and stents. Higher biomaterial usage is associated with an increased incidence of implant-related complications due to poor implant integration, inflammation, mechanical instability, necrosis and infections, and associated prolonged patient care, pain and loss of function. In this review, we will briefly explore major representatives of metallic biomaterials along with the key existing and emerging strategies for surface and bulk modification used to improve biointegration, mechanical strength and flexibility of biometals, and discuss their compatibility with the concept of 3D printing. View Full-Text
Keywords: biomaterial; inflammation; implant; advanced materials; surface modification biomaterial; inflammation; implant; advanced materials; surface modification
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Prasad, K.; Bazaka, O.; Chua, M.; Rochford, M.; Fedrick, L.; Spoor, J.; Symes, R.; Tieppo, M.; Collins, C.; Cao, A.; Markwell, D.; Ostrikov, K.(.; Bazaka, K. Metallic Biomaterials: Current Challenges and Opportunities. Materials 2017, 10, 884.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop