Anode Chamber Effluent of a Microbial Fuel Cell as a Sustainable Environment for the Cultivation of the Biohydrogen-Producing Microalga Tetraselmis subcordiformis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Organisation
2.2. Materials
2.2.1. Inoculum of T. subcordiformis
2.2.2. Fruit and Vegetable Wastewater and Culture Media
2.3. Photobioreactors
2.3.1. Cultivation of Microalgae in the Photobioreactor (S1)
2.3.2. Hydrogen Production Reactor (S2)
2.3.3. Characterisation of the Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC)
2.4. Analytical, Computational, and Statistical Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Cultivation Performance of T. subcordiformis
3.2. Nutrient Assimilation Efficiency in the Culture Medium
3.3. Characteristics and Properties of T. subcordiformis Biomass
3.4. Biohydrogen Production
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sułek, A.; Borowski, P.F. Business Models on the Energy Market in the Era of a Low-Emission Economy. Energies 2024, 17, 3235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, R.K.; Saini, D.K.; Verma, P.; Thakur, R.; Gandotra, N.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, B.B.; Verma, A. Climate Change and Energy Transition–a Critical Review. Int. J. Green. Energy 2025, 23, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dakal, T.C.; Singh, N.; Kaur, A.; Kaur Dhillon, P.; Bhatankar, J.; Meena, R.; Sharma, R.K.; Gadi, B.R.; Sahu, B.S.; Patel, A.; et al. New Horizons in Microbial Fuel Cell Technology: Applications, Challenges, and Prospects. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2025, 18, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Greenman, J.; Gajda, I.; Ieropoulos, I. Microbial Fuel Cells (MFC) and Microalgae; Photo Microbial Fuel Cell (PMFC) as Complete Recycling Machines. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2019, 3, 2546–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekuto, L.; Olowolafe, A.V.; Huberts, R.; Dyantyi, N.; Pandit, S.; Nomngongo, P. Microalgae as a Biocathode and Feedstock in Anode Chamber for a Self-Sustainable Microbial Fuel Cell Technology: A Review. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 31, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anandapadmanaban, B.H.; Liu, S.-H.; Lin, C.-W. Prospects of Microalgae in the Cathode Chamber of Microbial Fuel Cells: From Sequestration to Bioproduct Production. Biomass Bioenergy 2025, 194, 107616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolognesi, S.; Cecconet, D.; Callegari, A.; Capodaglio, A.G. Combined Microalgal Photobioreactor/Microbial Fuel Cell System: Performance Analysis Under Different Process Conditions. Environ. Res. 2021, 192, 110263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salim, H.; Al Farraji, A.; Khadim, H.J. A Review on Microbial Fuel Cell–Photobioreactor (MFC-PBR) Systems: Wastewater Treatment, Bioenergy Recovery, and CO2 Sequestration. Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodyn. 2025, 20, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansoor, B.; Ashraf, S.; Rehman, U.; Ullah, Z.; Sheikh, Z. Integration of Microalgae–Microbial Fuel Cell with Microbial Electrolysis Cell for Wastewater Treatment and Energy Production. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 25, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahirwar, A.; Khan, M.J.; Khandelwal, P.; Singh, G.; Harish; Vinayak, V.; Ghangrekar, M.M. Bioelectromics of a Photosynthetic Microalgae-Assisted Microbial Fuel Cell for Wastewater Treatment and Value-Added Production. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 30196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logan, B.E.; Hamelers, B.; Rozendal, R.; Schröder, U.; Keller, J.; Freguia, S.; Aelterman, P.; Verstraete, W.; Rabaey, K. Microbial Fuel Cells: Methodology and Technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5181–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tay, Z.H.; Ng, F.L.; Ling, T.C.; Iwamoto, M.; Phang, S.M. The Use of Marine Microalgae in Microbial Fuel Cells, Photosynthetic Microbial Fuel Cells and Biophotovoltaic Platforms for Bioelectricity Generation. 3 Biotech. 2022, 12, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amalapridman, V.; Ofori, P.A.; Abbey, L. Valorization of Algal Biomass to Biofuel: A Review. Biomass 2025, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.M.; Mofijur, M.; Uddin, M.N.; Kabir, Z.; Badruddin, I.A.; Khan, T.Y. Insights into anaerobic digestion of microalgal biomass for enhanced energy recovery. Front. Energy Res. 2024, 12, 1355686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawrot-Paw, M.; Drzewicka, W. Application of Rapeseed Oil Cake from Biodiesel Production in Methane Co-Digestion with Microalgal Biomass. Materials 2025, 18, 4542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucia, U.; Grisolia, G. Preliminary Considerations on the Co-Production of Biomethane and Ammonia from Algae and Bacteria. Inventions 2025, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos-Ballardo, D.U.; Font-Segura, X.; Ferrer, A.S.; Barrena, R.; Rossi, S.; Valdez-Ortiz, A. Valorisation of Biodiesel Production Wastes: Anaerobic Digestion of Residual Tetraselmis Suecica Biomass and Co-Digestion with Glycerol. Waste Manag. Res. 2015, 33, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dudek, M.; Dębowski, M.; Kazimierowicz, J.; Zieliński, M.; Quattrocelli, P.; Nowicka, A. The Cultivation of Biohydrogen-Producing Tetraselmis Subcordiformis Microalgae as the Third Stage of Dairy Wastewater Aerobic Treatment System. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dębowski, M.; Dudek, M.; Kazimierowicz, J.; Quattrocelli, P.; Rusanowska, P.; Barczak, Ł.; Nowicka, A.; Zieliński, M. Analysis of Multi-Biofuel Production During Cultivation of the Green Microalga Tetraselmis Subscordiformis. Energies 2024, 17, 3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yahampath Arachchige Don, C.D.Y.; Babel, S. Circulation of Anodic Effluent to the Cathode Chamber for Subsequent Treatment of Wastewater in Photosynthetic Microbial Fuel Cell with Generation of Bioelectricity and Algal Biomass. Chemosphere 2021, 278, 130455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Peña, E.I.; Parameswaran, P.; Kang, D.W.; Canul-Chan, M.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R. Anaerobic Digestion and Co-Digestion Processes of Vegetable and Fruit Residues: Process and Microbial Ecology. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 9447–9455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales-Amaral, M.M.; Gómez-Serrano, C.; Acién, F.G.; Fernández-Sevilla, J.M.; Molina-Grima, E. Production of Microalgae Using Centrate from Anaerobic Digestion as the Nutrient Source. Algal Res. 2015, 9, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Psachoulia, P.; Schortsianiti, S.N.; Lortou, U.; Gkelis, S.; Chatzidoukas, C.; Samaras, P. Assessment of Nutrients Recovery Capacity and Biomass Growth of Four Microalgae Species in Anaerobic Digestion Effluent. Water 2022, 14, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erkelens, M.; Ward, A.J.; Ball, A.S.; Lewis, D.M. Microalgae Digestate Effluent as a Growth Medium for Tetraselmis sp. in the Production of Biofuels. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 167, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Available online: https://sagdb.uni-goettingen.de/culture_media/08%20Porphyridium%20Medium.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2025).
- Dębowski, M.; Dudek, M.; Nowicka, A.; Quattrocelli, P.; Kazimierowicz, J.; Zieliński, M. Suitability of pre-digested dairy effluent for mixotrophic cultivation of the hydrogen-producing microalgae Tetraselmis subcordiformis. Environ. Technol. 2024, 45, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aiba, S.; Ogawa, T. Assessment of Growth Yield of a Blue--green Alga, Spirulina platensis, in Axenic and Continuous Culture. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977, 102, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, R.T.; Bangert, K.; Wilkinson, S.J.; Gilmour, D.J. Synergistic Carbon Metabolism in a Fast-Growing Mixotrophic Freshwater Microalgal Species Micractinium inermum. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 82, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.; Xiang, W.; Li, T.; Long, L. Transcriptome Analysis for Phosphorus Starvation-Induced Lipid Accumulation in Scenedesmus sp. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacroux, J.; Seira, J.; Trably, E.; Bernet, N.; Steyer, J.P.; van Lis, R. Mixotrophic Growth of Chlorella sorokiniana on Acetate and Butyrate: Interplay Between Substrate, C:N Ratio and pH. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 703614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, B.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Van de Waal, D.B. Biological Stoichiometry of Oleaginous Microalgal Lipid Synthesis: The Role of N:P Supply Ratios and Growth Rate on Microalgal Elemental and Biochemical Composition. Algal Res. 2018, 32, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, T.; Fernandes, I.; Andrade, C.A.P.; Cordeiro, N. Assessing the Impact of Sulfur Concentrations on Growth and Biochemical Composition of Three Marine Microalgae. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, W.; Yang, Y.; Chou, S.; Ge, S.; Li, P.; Wang, X.; Zhuang, L.-L.; Zhang, J. Effect of N/P Ratio on Attached Microalgae Growth and the Differentiated Metabolism Along the Depth of Biofilm. Environ. Res. 2024, 240, 117428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Magyar, T.; Németh, B.; Tamás, J.; Nagy, P.T. Improvement of N and P Ratio for Enhanced Biomass Productivity and Sustainable Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris Microalgae. Heliyon 2024, 10, e23238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faruque, M.O.; Ilyas, M.; Hossain, M.M.; Razzak, S.A. Influence of Nitrogen to Phosphorus Ratio and CO2 Concentration on Lipid Accumulation of Scenedesmus dimorphus for Bioenergy Production and CO2 Biofixation. Chem. Asian J. 2020, 15, 4307–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ugya, A.Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, Q. Microalgae Biofilm System as an Efficient Tool for Wastewater Remediation and Potential Bioresources for Pharmaceutical Product Production: An Overview. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2024, 26, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezayian, M.; Niknam, V.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. Oxidative Damage and Antioxidative System in Algae. Toxicol. Rep. 2019, 6, 1309–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milrad, Y.; Mosebach, L.; Buchert, F. Regulation of Microalgal Photosynthetic Electron Transfer. Plants 2024, 13, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, S.H.; McHardy, C.; Rauh, C.; Jahn, A.; Luzi, G.; Delgado, A.; Buchholz, R.; Lindenbergar, C. A New Approach for Calculating Microalgae Culture Growth Based on an Inhibitory Effect of the Surrounding Biomass. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 44, 1671–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Guo, W.; Yen, H.W.; Ho, S.H.; Lo, Y.C.; Cheng, C.L.; Ren, N.; Chang, J.S. Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris JSC-6 with Swine Wastewater for Simultaneous Nutrient/COD Removal and Carbohydrate Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 198, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koletti, A.; Skliros, D.; Dervisi, I.; Roussis, A.; Flemetakis, E. Oxidative Stress Responses in Microalgae: Modern Insights into an Old Topic. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijayan, J.; Wase, N.; Liu, K.; Morse, W.; Zhang, C.; Riekhof, W.R. ROS-Mediated Thylakoid Membrane Remodeling and Triacylglycerol Biosynthesis under Nitrogen Starvation in the Alga Chlorella sorokiniana. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1418049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ugya, A.Y.; Imam, T.S.; Li, A.; Ma, J.; Hua, X. Antioxidant Response Mechanism of Freshwater Microalgae Species to Reactive Oxygen Species Production: A Mini Review. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 36, 174–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alalawy, A.I.; Yang, Y.; Almutairi, F.M.; El Rabey, H.A.; Al-Duais, M.A.; Abomohra, A.; Salama, E.S. Freshwater Microalgae-Based Wastewater Treatment under Abiotic Stress. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2023, 10, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dębowski, M.; Kisielewska, M.; Kazimierowicz, J.; Zieliński, M. Biophotolysis vs. Anaerobic Digestion—An Experimental Comparison of Two Pathways for Biohydrogen Production by Tetraselmis subcordiformis. Phycology 2025, 5, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zieliński, M.; Barczak, Ł.; Rusanowska, P.; Kazimierowicz, J.; Dębowski, M. Comparison of Biohydrogen Production by Tetraselmis subcordiformis During Cultivation Using Soil-Less Agricultural Wastewater and Effluent from Microbial Fuel Cells. Energies 2024, 17, 5287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zieliński, M.; Barczak, Ł.; Rusanowska, P.; Nowicka, A.; Dębowski, M. Microbial Fuel Cells as CO2 Source in the Autotrophic Cultivation of the Green Microalgae Tetraselmis subcordiformis: Impact on Biomass Growth, Nutrient Removal, and Hydrogen Production. Energies 2025, 18, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ugya, A.Y. The efficiency and antioxidant response of microalgae biofilm in the phycoremediation of wastewater resulting from tannery, textile, and dyeing activities. Int. Aquat. Res. 2021, 13, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Touloupakis, E.; Faraloni, C.; Silva Benavides, A.M.; Torzillo, G. Recent Achievements in Microalgal Photobiological Hydrogen Production. Energies 2021, 14, 7170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uggetti, E.; Sialve, B.; Latrille, E.; Steyer, J.-P. Anaerobic digestate as substrate for microalgae culture: The role of ammonium concentration on the microalgae productivity. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 152, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jhouhanggir, D.I.P.; Pertiwiningrum, A.; Fitriyanto, N.A.; Suyono, E.A. Integrating anaerobic digestate effluent into microalgal systems for renewable biomass and wastewater treatment: Effects of dilution, c/n ratio, and growth modelling. Results Eng. 2025, 27, 106044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarponi, P.; Bonetto, A.; Bolzonella, D.; Astals, S.; Cavinato, C. Anaerobic Co-Digestion Effluent as Substrate for Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus obliquus Cultivation. Energies 2020, 13, 4880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuliani, L.; Frison, N.; Jelic, A.; Fatone, F.; Bolzonella, D.; Ballottari, M. Microalgae Cultivation on Anaerobic Digestate of Municipal Wastewater, Sewage Sludge and Agro-Waste. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Xie, H.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, T. Effect of anoxic/aerobic phase fraction on N2O emission in a sequencing batch reactor under low temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 5486–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, S.; Lee, N.; Park, S.; Yu, J.; Luong, T.T.; Oh, Y.-K.; Lee, T. Microalgae cultivation for bioenergy production using wastewaters from a municipal WWTP as nutritional sources. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Z.; Sun, D.; Cheng, K.W.; Chen, F. Investigation of Carbon and Energy Metabolic Mechanism of Mixotrophy in Chromochloris zofingiensis. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, X.; Jin, C.; Zhang, C.; Li, P.; Huang, J.J.; Wu, J.; Wu, J.; Hu, Z. Mixotrophic Chlorella pyrenoidosa Biofilm with Enhanced Biomass Production, Microalgal Activity, and Nutrient Removal from Nutrient-Rich Wastewater. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 157, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhatnagar, A.; Chinnasamy, S.; Singh, M.; Das, K.C. Renewable Biomass Production by Mixotrophic Algae in the Presence of Various Carbon Sources and Wastewaters. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3425–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, M.S.; Yao, X.D.; Shu, L.; Yan, Y.J.; Wang, Z.; Li, N.; Cui, X.-T.; Lin, Y.-M.; Kong, Q. Mixotrophic Growth and Biochemical Analysis of Chlorella vulgaris Cultivated with Synthetic Domestic Wastewater. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016, 113, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nápoles-Armenta, J.; Romero-Soto, I.C.; Samaniego-Moreno, L.; Díaz-Tenorio, L.M.; Soto, L.A.L.; Mora-Orozco, C.D.L.; González Pérez, R.; Martínez-Orozco, E.; García-Gómez, C.; Pérez-Valencia, L.I. Advanced Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Bioproduct Generation via Optimized Autotrophic and Mixotrophic Microalgal Cultivation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goswami, R.K.; Agrawal, K.; Mehariya, S.; Rajagopal, R.; Karthikeyan, O.P.; Verma, P. Development of Economical and Sustainable Cultivation System for Biomass Production and Simultaneous Treatment of Municipal Wastewater Using Tetraselmis indica BDUG001. Environ. Technol. 2023, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michels, M.H.A.; Vaskoska, M.; Vermuë, M.H.; Wijffels, R.H. Growth of Tetraselmis suecica in a tubular photobioreactor on wastewater from a fish farm. Water Res. 2014, 65C, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goswami, R.K.; Agrawal, K.; Mehariya, S.; Verma, P. Current Perspective on Wastewater Treatment Using Photobioreactor for Tetraselmis sp.: An Emerging and Foreseeable Sustainable Approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 61905–61937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amit, G.; Ghosh, U.K.; Gautam, R.; Jaiswal, A.; Pandey, S. Phycoremediation of Dairy Wastewater and Biodiesel Production Using Marine Microalgae Tetraselmis indica. In Advances in Functional and Smart Materials: Select Proceedings of ICFMMP 2021; Springer: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, J.J.; Gagnon, G.A.; Jamieson, R.C. Microalgae Growth and Phosphorus Uptake in Wastewater under Simulated Cold Region Conditions. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 95, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y. Revisiting Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Metabolisms in Microalgae for Wastewater Treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 762, 144590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dyhrman, S.T.; Jenkins, B.D.; Rynearson, T.A.; Saito, M.A.; Mercier, M.L.; Alexander, H.; Whitney, L.P.; Drzewianowski, A.; Bulygin, V.V.; Bertrand, E.M.; et al. The Transcriptome and Proteome of the Diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana Reveal a Diverse Phosphorus Stress Response. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Solovchenko, A.E.; Ismagulova, T.T.; Lukyanov, A.A.; Svetlana, G.V.; Konyukhov, I.V.; Pogosyan, S.I.; Lobakova, E.S.; Gorelova, O.A. Luxury Phosphorus Uptake in Microalgae. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 2755–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.H.; Zhang, T.Y.; Dao, G.H.; Xu, X.-Q.; Wang, X.-X.; Hu, H.-Y. Microalgae-Based Advanced Municipal Wastewater Treatment for Reuse in Water Bodies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 2659–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, H.; Li, J.; Chen, P.; Chang, Z.; Shen, M.; Zhao, F. Cultivation of Green Algae Platymonas helgolandica in Rearing Water Enhances the Growth Performance and Resistance of Litopenaeus vannamei against Vibrio parahaemolyticus Infection. Aquac. Int. 2017, 25, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, H.; Yuan, Q. Removal of Nitrogen from Wastewater Using Microalgae and Microalgae–Bacteria Consortia. Cogent Environ. Sci. 2016, 2, 1275089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giordano, M.; Raven, J.A. Nitrogen and Sulfur Assimilation in Plants and Algae. Aquat. Bot. 2014, 118, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turon, V.; Baroukh, C.; Trably, E.; Latrille, E.; Fouilland, E.; Steyer, J.-P. Use of Fermentative Metabolites for Heterotrophic Microalgae Growth: Yields and Kinetics. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heredia-Arroyo, T.; Wei, W.; Ruan, R.; Hu, B. Mixotrophic Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris and Its Potential Application for Oil Accumulation from Non-Sugar Materials. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 2245–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Johns, M.R. Substrate Inhibition of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by Acetate in Heterotrophic Culture. Process Biochem. 1994, 29, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perchikov, R.; Cheliukanov, M.; Plekhanova, Y.; Tarasov, S.; Kharkova, A.; Butusov, D.; Arlyapov, V.; Nakamura, H.; Reshetilov, A. Microbial Biofilms: Features of Formation and Potential for Use in Bioelectrochemical Devices. Biosensors 2024, 14, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nosek, D.; Mikołajczyk, T.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A. Enhancing microbial fuel cell performance: Anode modification with reduced graphene oxide and iron (III) for improved electricity generation. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2024, 26, 4095–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, X.; Lu, B.; Yan, C.; Gu, J.; Ren, N.; Ren, Z.J.; Xing, D. The interplay of active energy harvesting and wastewater organic loading regulates fermentation products and microbiomes in microbial fuel cells. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 183, 106366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez-Vargas, C.A.; Prado, A.; Arias, C.A.; Carvalho, P.N.; Esteve-Núñez, A.; Brix, H. Microbial Electrochemical Technologies for Wastewater Treatment: Principles and Evolution from Microbial Fuel Cells to Bioelectrochemical-Based Constructed Wetlands. Water 2018, 10, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahto, K.U.; Das, S. Electroactive biofilm communities in microbial fuel cells for the synergistic treatment of wastewater and bioelectricity generation. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2025, 45, 434–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandit, S.; Savla, N.; Sonawane, J.M.; Sani, A.M.; Gupta, P.K.; Mathuriya, A.S.; Rai, A.K.; Jadhav, D.A.; Jung, S.P.; Prasad, R. Agricultural Waste and Wastewater as Feedstock for Bioelectricity Generation Using Microbial Fuel Cells: Recent Advances. Fermentation 2021, 7, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isanta-Navarro, J.; Peoples, L.M.; Bras, B.; Church, M.J.; Elser, J.J. Elemental and Macromolecular Plasticity of Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii (Chlorophyta) in Response to Resource Limitation and Growth Rate. J. Phycol. 2024, 60, 418–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bora, A.; Rajan, A.S.T.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Muthusamy, G.; Alagarsamy, A. Microalgae to bioenergy production: Recent advances, influencing parameters, utilization of wastewater–A critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 946, 174230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillebrand, H.; Steinert, G.; Boersma, M.; Malzahn, A.; Meunier, C.L.; Plum, C.; Ptacnik, R. Golman Revisited: Faster-Growing Phytoplankton Has Lower N:P and Lower Stoichiometric Flexibility. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2013, 58, 2076–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loladze, I.; Elser, J.J. The Origins of the Redfield Nitrogen-to-Phosphorus Ratio Are in a Homoeostatic Protein-to-rRNA Ratio. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bi, R.; Arndt, C.; Sommer, U. Stoichiometric Responses of Phytoplankton Species to the Interactive Effect of Nutrient Supply Ratios and Growth Rates. J. Phycol. 2012, 48, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ekpan, F.M.; Ori, M.O.; Samuel, H.S. Effects of Environmental Factors and Nutrient Availability on the Biochemical Composition of Algae for Biofuel Production. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ledda, C.; Idà, A.; Allemand, D.; Mariani, P.; Adani, F. Production of wild Chlorella sp. cultivated in digested and membrane-pretreated swine manure derived from a full-scale operation plant. Algal Res. 2015, 12, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Hajar, H.A.; Riefler, R.G.; Stuart, B.J. Cultivation of Scenedesmus dimorphus using anaerobic digestate as a nutrient medium. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 40, 1197–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Farias Silva, C.E.; Sforza, E.; Bertucco, A. Stability of Carbohydrate Production in Continuous Microalgal Cultivation under Nitrogen Limitation: Effect of Irradiation Regime and Intensity on Tetradesmus Obliquus. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X. Impact of Natural Microorganisms on the Removal of COD and the Cells Activity of Chlorella sp. in Wastewater. Water 2023, 15, 3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, D.; He, Q. Assessment of Environmental Stresses for Enhanced Microalgal Biofuel Production–An Overview. Front. Energy Res. 2014, 2, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plouviez, M.; Abyadeh, M.; Hasan, M.; Mirzaei, M.; Paulo, J.A.; Guieysse, B. The Proteome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii during Phosphorus Depletion and Repletion. Algal Res. 2023, 71, 103037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suárez Quintana, W.H.; García-Rico, R.O.; García-Martínez, J.B.; Urbina-Suarez, N.A.; López-Barrera, G.L.; Barajas-Solano, A.F.; Zuorro, A. Enhancement of Metabolite Production in High-Altitude Microalgal Strains by Optimized C/N/P Ratio. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.-L.; Zhuang, Y.-Q.; Xiong, Y.-Y.; Li, D.-W.; Ou, L.-J. Efficient Modulation of Cellular Phosphorus Components in Response to Phosphorus Deficiency in the Dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e0086723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qari, H.A.; Al-Shaeri, M.A.; Oves, M. Effect of Phosphorus Deprivation on Fatty Acid Synthesis in Scenedesmus subspicatus Microalgae from Rostherne Mere. Fuels 2024, 5, 910–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baiee, M.A.; Salman, J.M. Effect of Phosphorus Concentration and Light Intensity on Protein Content of Microalga Chlorella vulgaris. Mesopotamian Environ. J. 2016, 2, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
- Hippler, M.; Khosravitabar, F. Light-Driven H2 Production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Lessons from Engineering of Photosynthesis. Plants 2024, 13, 2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J.H.; Kim, H.C.; Choi, J.A.; Abou-Shanab, R.A.I.; Dempsey, B.A.; Regan, J.M.; Kim, J.R.; Song, H.; Nam, I.-H.; Kim, S.-N.; et al. Photoautotrophic Hydrogen Production by Eukaryotic Microalgae under Aerobic Conditions. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagy, V.; Podmaniczki, A.; Vidal-Meireles, A.; Tengölics, R.; Kovács, L.; Rákhely, G.; Scoma, A.; Tóth, S.Z. Water-Splitting-Based, Sustainable and Efficient H2 Production in Green Algae as Achieved by Substrate Limitation of the Calvin-Benson-Bassham Cycle. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liran, O.; Semyatich, R.; Milrad, Y.; Eilenberg, H.; Weiner, I.; Yacoby, I. Microoxic Niches within the Thylakoid Stroma of Air-Grown Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Protect [FeFe]-Hydrogenase and Support Hydrogen Production under Fully Aerobic Environment. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Li, S.-Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.-P.; Guo, J.-S.; Liu, S.-Y.; Yan, P. New Insights into Microalgal Photobiological Hydrogen Production: Potential Role of Aggregation Forms in Modulating the Hydrogenase Activity and Metabolic Properties of Microalgae during Hydrogen Production. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 500, 156802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, J.; Swartz, J.R. System Analysis and Improved [FeFe] Hydrogenase O2 Tolerance Suggest Feasibility for Photosynthetic H2 Production. Metab. Eng. 2018, 49, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seibert, M.; King, P.W.; Posewitz, M.C.; Melis, A.; Ghirardi, M.L. Photosynthetic water-splitting for hydrogen production. In Bioenergy; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; pp. 273–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Wu, J.; Meng, F. Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microalgae: A Review of the Regulation of Growth, Stress Resistance, Metabolic Processes, and Biodegradation of Pollutants. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 737248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallenbeck, P.C.; Abo-Hashesh, M.; Ghosh, D. Strategies for improving biological hydrogen production. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Touloupakis, E.; Faraloni, C.; Silva Benavides, A.M.; Masojidek, J.; Torzillo, G. Sustained photobiological hydrogen production by Chlorella vulgaris without nutient starvation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 3684–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daneshvar, E.; Zarrinmehr, M.J.; Hashtjin, A.M.; Farhadian, O.; Bhatnagar, A. Versatile applications of freshwater and marine water microalgae in dairy wastewater treatment, lipid extraction and tetracycline biosorption. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 268, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruiz-Marin, A.; Canedo-López, Y.; Chávez-Fuentes, P. Biohydrogen production by Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus obliquus immobilized cultivated in artificial wastewater under different light quality. AMB Express 2020, 10, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dębowski, M.; Dudek, M.; Zieliński, M.; Nowicka, A.; Kazimierowicz, J. Microalgal Hydrogen Production in Relation to Other Biomass-Based Technologies—A Review. Energies 2021, 14, 6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, H.; Tsigkou, K.; Elsamahy, T.; Pispas, K.; Sun, J.; Manthos, G.; Schagerl, M.; Sventzouri, E.; Al-Tohamy, R.; Kornaros, M.; et al. Recent Advances in Sustainable Hydrogen Production from Microalgae: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 270, 115908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Dalatony, M.M.; Zheng, Y.; Ji, M.K.; Li, X.; Salama, E.S. Metabolic Pathways for Microalgal Biohydrogen Production: Current Progress and Future Prospectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 318, 124253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardo, F.M.; Lim, J.W.; Ramli, A.; Lam, M.K.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Abdelfattah, E.A.; Shahid, M.K.; Usman, A.; Wongsakulphasatch, S.; Sahrin, N.T. A Review in Redressing Challenges to Produce Sustainable Hydrogen from Microalgae for Aviation Industry. Fuel 2022, 330, 125646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arimbrathodi, S.P.; Javed, M.A.; Hamouda, M.A.; Hassan, A.A.; Ahmed, M.E. BioH2 Production Using Microalgae: Highlights on Recent Advancements from a Bibliometric Analysis. Water 2023, 15, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.F.; Mofijur, M.; Nahrin, M.; Chowdhury, S.N.; Nuzhat, S.; Alherek, M.; Rafa, N.; Ong, H.C.; Nghiem, L.D.; Mahlia, T.M.I. Biohydrogen Production from Wastewater-Based Microalgae: Progresses and Challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 47, 37321–37342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Parameter | Unit | Value (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|
| COD | mg O2/L | 8400 ± 4032 |
| BOD5 | mg O2/L | 5040 ± 2688 |
| TSS | mg/L | 2700 ± 1600 |
| pH | – | 6.7 ± 0.8 |
| Soluble sugars | mg/L | 4200 ± 2300 |
| TN (total nitrogen) | mg N/L | 249 ± 120 |
| NH4+-N | mg N/L | 53 ± 35 |
| TP (total phosphorus) | mg P/L | 27 ± 17 |
| P-PO4 | mg P/L | 18 ± 6.2 |
| Lipids | mg/L | 135 ± 85 |
| Conductivity | mS/cm | 11.8 ± 4.7 |
| Parameter | Unit | V1—1.0 g COD/L·d (HRT 8.4 Days) | V2—2.0 g COD/L·d (HRT 4.2 Days) | V3—3.0 g COD/L·d (HRT 2.8 Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COD | mg O2/L | 2100 ± 1010 | 2250 ± 1150 | 3200 ± 1460 |
| BOD5 | mg O2/L | 504 ± 250 | 540 ± 270 | 800 ± 380 |
| TSS | mg/L | 1080 ± 330 | 1120 ± 420 | 1550 ± 450 |
| pH | – | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 6.88 ± 0.33 | 6.7 ± 0.5 |
| Soluble sugars | mg/L | 125 ± 85 | 140 ± 92 | 154 ± 77 |
| TN | mg N/L | 217 ± 111 | 215 ± 106 | 226 ± 115 |
| NH4+-N | mg N/L | 100 ± 50 | 110 ± 55 | 130 ± 65 |
| TP | mg P/L | 22 ± 11 | 22.5 ± 12 | 25 ± 12 |
| P-PO4 | mg P/L | 13 ± 2 | 14 ± 3 | 14 ± 3 |
| Lipids | mg/L | 34 ± 20 | 36 ± 21 | 80 ± 43 |
| Conductivity | mS/cm | 10.5 ± 4.0 | 10.6 ± 4.1 | 11.2 ± 4.5 |
| Variant | OLR (g COD/L·d) | HRT (d) | Power Density P (mW/m2) | Power Output (mW) | Voltage (mV) | Current Ī (mA) | Coulombic Efficiency C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V1 | 1.0 | 8.4 | 35 ± 5 | 0.098 ± 0.042 | 313 ± 67 | 0.313 ± 0.067 | 22 ± 8 |
| V2 | 2.0 | 4.2 | 60 ± 25 | 0.168 ± 0.070 | 410 ± 85 | 0.410 ± 0.085 | 16 ± 6 |
| V3 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 55 ± 30 | 0.154 ± 0.084 | 392 ± 107 | 0.392 ± 0.107 | 11 ± 5 |
| Parameter | Method | Equipment/Manufacturer, City, Country |
|---|---|---|
| Volatile solids (VS) | Gravimetric determination by ignition at 550 °C | Muffle furnace LAC L, Dąbrowica, Poland; ash weighing DanLab AX423, Białystok, Poland |
| Taxonomic analysis | Light microscopy | Biological microscope MF 346 with Optech 3MP camera, Eduko, Warsaw, Poland |
| COD | Dichromate method PN-EN 12260 with sample mineralisation | Block Digest mineraliser, VELP Scientifica, Usmate, Italy; UV/VIS DR 5000 spectrophotometer, Hach Lange, Düsseldorf, Germany |
| BOD5 | 5-day incubation | OxiTop-IDC respirometer, WTW, Weilheim, Germany; standard respirometric procedure |
| Total nitrogen (TN) | Kjeldahl/spectrophotometric | UV/VIS DR 5000 spectrophotometer, Hach Lange, Düsseldorf, Germany; Kjeldahl apparatus VELP Scientifica, Usmate, Italy |
| NH4-N | Colorimetric | UV/VIS DR 5000 spectrophotometer, Hach Lange, Düsseldorf, Germany |
| Total phosphorus (TP) | Colorimetric (molybdenum method) | UV/VIS DR 5000 spectrophotometer, Hach Lange, Düsseldorf, Germany |
| pH | Glass electrode | pH meter 1000 L, VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA |
| Salinity | Conductivity electrode | Marine Control Digital, Aqua Medic, Janikowo, Poland |
| VS (in wastewater) | Gravimetric | Ignition in LAC L muffle furnace, Dąbrowica, Poland |
| Protein | Nitrogen determination (Kjeldahl) × factor 6.25 | Kjeldahl apparatus VELP Scientifica, Usmate, Italy |
| Lipids | Soxhlet extraction/chloroform method | Soxhlet apparatus VELP Scientifica, Usmate, Italy; chloroform Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; analytical balance Sartorius Cubis, Göttingen, Germany |
| Sugars | Phenol-sulfuric colorimetric method | UV/VIS DR 5000 spectrophotometer, Hach Lange, Düsseldorf, Germany |
| H2, O2, CO2 | Gas chromatography | GC Agilent 7890 A, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA; samples collected with gas-tight syringe |
| Gas production rate (r) and kinetic constants (k) | Nonlinear (iterative) regression | – |
| Experimental replications | Four replicates per variant | – |
| Statistical analysis | – | Statistics 13.3, Statsoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA |
| Significance level | – | α = 0.05 |
| Normality and homogeneity tests | – | Shapiro–Wilk test, Levene’s test |
| Analysis of differences between means | – | One-way ANOVA and HSD (honestly significant difference) test |
| Variant | Growth Phase | Duration [Days] | Total Increase [mg VS/L] | Growth Rate [mg VS/L·d] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V1 | Lag | 0–2 | 78 ± 36.3 | 15.2 ± 4.8 |
| Exponential | 2–10 | 661 ± 79.0 | 89.7 ± 14.5 | |
| Stationary | 10–11 | 66 ± 102.7 | 5.2 ± 2.1 | |
| Death | 11–14 | −6 ± 104.3 | −3.5 ± 1.8 | |
| V2 | Lag | 0–2 | 109 ± 32.3 | 18.0 ± 5.0 |
| Exponential | 2–10 | 826 ± 82.0 | 101.5 ± 15.2 | |
| Stationary | 10–12 | 2 ± 106.0 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | |
| Death | 12–14 | −67 ± 107.7 | −6.3 ± 2.5 | |
| V3 | Lag | 0–4 | 75 ± 18.0 | 32.0 ± 6.5 |
| Exponential | 4–9 | 388 ± 47.0 | 77.6 ± 7.1 | |
| Stationary | 9–11 | 30 ± 71.7 | 3.1 ± 1.2 | |
| Death | 11–14 | −23 ± 75.0 | −6.8 ± 2.3 |
| Indicator | Unit | V1 | V2 | V3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final biomass concentration | mg VS/L | 970 ± 102 | 1087 ± 106 | 745 ± 75 |
| VS linear growth phase | dni | 2–10 | 2–10 | 4–9 |
| VS growth rate in the logarithmic growth phase | mg VS/L·d | 89.7 ± 14.5 | 101.5 ± 15.2 | 77.6 ± 7.1 |
| TN utilisation rate for biomass growth | mg TN/g VS | 31.4 ± 4.8 | 32.1 ± 5.1 | 28.7 ± 4.3 |
| TN removal efficiency | % | 48.7 ± 5.2 | 49.1 ± 5.4 | 42.3 ± 4.7 |
| Final TN concentration | mg/L | 111 ± 12 | 110 ± 13 | 130 ± 12 |
| N-NH4 utilisation rate for biomass growth | mg N-NH4/g VS | 14.5 ± 2.3 | 15.2 ± 2.5 | 12.8 ± 2.0 |
| N-NH4 removal efficiency | % | 48.1 ± 5.1 | 49.0 ± 5.3 | 41.2 ± 4.5 |
| Final N-NH4 concentration | mg/L | 52 ± 6 | 56 ± 7 | 76 ± 8 |
| TP utilisation rate for biomass growth | mg TP/g VS | 13.7 ± 2.0 | 14.2 ± 2.1 | 12.1 ± 1.7 |
| TP removal efficiency | % | 62.3 ± 6.2 | 63.1 ± 6.5 | 55.0 ± 5.0 |
| Final TP concentration | mg/L | 8 ± 1 | 8.3 ± 1.2 | 11.3 ± 1.5 |
| P-PO4 utilisation rate for biomass growth | mg P-PO4/g VS | 7.8 ± 1.2 | 8.1 ± 1.3 | 6.9 ± 1.1 |
| P-PO4 removal efficiency | % | 59.0 ± 5.8 | 60.3 ± 6.0 | 52.0 ± 4.7 |
| Final P-PO4 concentration | mg/L | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 5.6 ± 0.8 | 6.7 ± 0.9 |
| COD utilisation rate for biomass growth | mg COD/g VS | 210 ± 25 | 225 ± 28 | 180 ± 20 |
| COD removal efficiency | % | 43.5 ± 4.5 | 44.8 ± 5.0 | 36.7 ± 4.1 |
| Final COD concentration | mg O2/L | 1190 ± 120 | 1 240 ± 135 | 2030 ± 160 |
| TOC utilisation rate for biomass growth | mg TOC/g VS | 180 ± 22 | 192 ± 24 | 158 ± 18 |
| TOC removal efficiency | % | 46.7 ± 5.0 | 48.0 ± 5.2 | 39.5 ± 4.3 |
| Final TOC concentration | mg/L | 96 ± 11 | 100 ± 12 | 123 ± 14 |
| Parameter | Unit | V1 | V2 | V3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatile solids (VS) | % TS | 86.2 ± 2.8 | 88.5 ± 3.1 | 85.3 ± 3.6 |
| Mineral solids (MS) | % TS | 13.8 ± 2.8 | 11.5 ± 3.1 | 14.7 ± 3.6 |
| Total carbon (TC) | mg/g VS | 540.7 ± 26.4 | 565.3 ± 28.9 | 528.4 ± 25.7 |
| Total organic carbon (TOC) | mg/g VS | 505.3 ± 21.7 | 530.6 ± 23.5 | 498.1 ± 22.4 |
| TN | mg/g VS | 48.2 ± 3.4 | 50.1 ± 3.7 | 46.5 ± 3.9 |
| C/N ratio | — | 10.5 ± 0.7 | 10.6 ± 0.8 | 10.7 ± 0.7 |
| TP | mg/g VS | 11.3 ± 0.9 | 12.0 ± 1.1 | 10.8 ± 0.9 |
| pH of the biomass | — | 7.18 ± 0.19 | 7.12 ± 0.17 | 7.05 ± 0.21 |
| Protein | mg/g VS | 370.4 ± 28.5 | 402.7 ± 31.2 | 355.1 ± 29.8 |
| Soluble sugars | mg/g VS | 135.6 ± 16.4 | 142.3 ± 18.2 | 130.4 ± 15.7 |
| Lipids | mg/g VS | 72.5 ± 11.8 | 78.3 ± 12.5 | 80.7 ± 13.6 |
| Parameter | Unit | V1 | V2 | V3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total biomass | mg VS | 941 ± 104 | 1020 ± 108 | 730 ± 76 |
| Total H2 production | mL | 182.3 ± 23.1 | 184.7 ± 25.0 | 112.0 ± 14.8 |
| H2 production rate constant (k) | 1/h | 0.0435 ± 0.0051 | 0.0441 ± 0.0054 | 0.0348 ± 0.0045 |
| H2 production rate (r) | mL/h | 8.74 ± 1.11 | 8.85 ± 1.19 | 5.35 ± 0.70 |
| Specific H2 production (unique H2) | mL/g VS | 193.7 ± 32.6 | 181.1 ± 31.1 | 153.4 ± 25.8 |
| Biogas composition—H2 | % | 58.2 ± 4.5 | 58.7 ± 4.6 | 58.0 ± 4.4 |
| Biogas composition—CO2 | % | 35.6 ± 3.8 | 35.3 ± 3.7 | 35.9 ± 3.9 |
| Biogas composition—O2 | % | 6.2 ± 1.2 | 6.0 ± 1.3 | 6.1 ± 1.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zieliński, M.; Kisielewska, M.; Rusanowska, P.; Kazimierowicz, J.; Dębowski, M. Anode Chamber Effluent of a Microbial Fuel Cell as a Sustainable Environment for the Cultivation of the Biohydrogen-Producing Microalga Tetraselmis subcordiformis. Energies 2026, 19, 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040877
Zieliński M, Kisielewska M, Rusanowska P, Kazimierowicz J, Dębowski M. Anode Chamber Effluent of a Microbial Fuel Cell as a Sustainable Environment for the Cultivation of the Biohydrogen-Producing Microalga Tetraselmis subcordiformis. Energies. 2026; 19(4):877. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040877
Chicago/Turabian StyleZieliński, Marcin, Marta Kisielewska, Paulina Rusanowska, Joanna Kazimierowicz, and Marcin Dębowski. 2026. "Anode Chamber Effluent of a Microbial Fuel Cell as a Sustainable Environment for the Cultivation of the Biohydrogen-Producing Microalga Tetraselmis subcordiformis" Energies 19, no. 4: 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040877
APA StyleZieliński, M., Kisielewska, M., Rusanowska, P., Kazimierowicz, J., & Dębowski, M. (2026). Anode Chamber Effluent of a Microbial Fuel Cell as a Sustainable Environment for the Cultivation of the Biohydrogen-Producing Microalga Tetraselmis subcordiformis. Energies, 19(4), 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040877

