Underground Coal Gasification Induced Multi-Physical Field Evolution and Overlying Strata Fracture Propagation: A Case Study Targeting Deep Steeply Inclined Coal Seams
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Geological Conditions of SICS
3. Numerical Model
4. Governing Equations
4.1. Heat Distribution
4.2. Thermoelastic Constitutive Equation
4.3. Formation of the Gasified Cavity
4.4. Initiation Criterion for Damage
4.5. Damage Evolution Criterion
5. Results and Discussion
5.1. Temperature Field Evolution
5.2. Stress Field Evolution
5.3. Displacement Field Evolution
5.4. Implications of Induced Fractures on Stress Field Evolution
5.5. The Limited Length of Gasification Channel Considering Overlying Strata Fractures’ Propagation
6. Conclusions
- (1)
- The maximum influence range of the temperature field varied with different combustion cavity lengths. A longer combustion cavity length resulted in a greater expansion range of the temperature field. Perpendicular to the gasification channel direction, rock units at lower elevations of SICS tended to heat up more rapidly. As the combustion cavity length increased from 100 m to 400 m, the expansion ranges of the temperature field in the shallow and deep sections extended from 15.56 m to 26.67 m and from 17.78 m to 28.89 m, respectively.
- (2)
- UCG of SICS induced intense thermomechanical coupling effects, driving significant spatial redistribution of the strata stress field, while fracture propagation was accompanied by notable local pressure relief. Rock units near the gasification starting point exhibited early response and low peak stress characteristics, whereas those near the gasification endpoint demonstrated late response and high peak stress characteristics. When the combustion cavity length reached 400 m, the maximum height of the induced fractures reached 204.44 m, with an average height of 172 m.
- (3)
- The floor mudstone experienced upward displacement as a result of thermal expansion, whereas the roof and overlying strata underwent downward displacement caused by rock layer deformation resulting from fracture propagation. The magnitude of this displacement demonstrated stepped increases over time, reaching a maximum subsidence of 3.29 m upon completion of the gasification process.
- (4)
- Fracture propagation is the primary factor leading to abrupt displacement in rock strata and a sharp decline in bearing capacity, and it is inferred that this may induce hazards such as roof collapse and surface subsidence. Therefore, in the practical design of UCG projects for steeply inclined coal seams within the study area, it is recommended that the gasification channel length not exceed 200 m to mitigate the aforementioned risks. The relevant conclusions of this study can provide theoretical guidance and technical support for the preliminary design of UCG cavities in steeply inclined coal seams. It should be noted that the prediction of groundwater inflow risks may require dedicated hydrogeological analysis for a comprehensive assessment. Future work aims to enhance the predictive capability for multi-field coupling processes and safety design parameters in practical UCG applications.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Perkins, G. Underground coal gasification—Part I: Field demonstrations and process performance. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2018, 67, 158–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.; Mmbaga, J.; Shirazi, A.; Trivedi, J.; Liu, Q.; Gupta, R. Modelling underground coal gasification—A review. Energies 2015, 8, 12603–12668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Zhao, S.; Liu, Z.; Chen, G. Research on evaluation technology system of mid-deep underground coal gasification based on researchers from China. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Wu, J.; Han, S.; Zhang, R.; Jiang, S.; Gu, X. Research on the low carbon development path of China’s coal industry under carbon peaking & carbon neutral target: Based on the RCPs-SSPs framework. Resour. Policy 2023, 86, 104091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kačur, J.; Laciak, M.; Durdán, M.; Flegner, P. Investigation of underground coal gasification in laboratory conditions: A review of recent research. Energies 2023, 16, 6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, H.P.; Nie, X.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, C.; Gao, F. Fluidized mining and in-situ transformation of deep underground coal resources: A novel approach to ensuring safe, environmentally friendly, low-carbon, and clean utilisation. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2019, 6, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, X.Y.; Zhuang, W.W.; Liu, F.P.; Chang, T.H.; Chiu, Y.H. China’s path of carbon neutralization to develop green energy and improve energy efficiency. Renew. Energy 2023, 206, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, Y.; Kong, D.; Song, G. Research hotspots and development trends of green coal mining: Exploring the path to sustainable development of coal mines. Resour. Policy 2024, 92, 105039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Liu, S.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Cao, J.; Qi, C.; Wang, W. Pore structure evolution of semi-coke under steam atmosphere in the context of deep underground coal gasification. Fuel Process. Technol. 2025, 278, 108329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Ling, Z.; Song, Y. Some new insights into the synergy occurring during char gasification in CO2/H2O mixtures. Fuel 2020, 268, 117307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, W.; Liu, H.; Chang, Z.; Cao, D.; Liu, S. Study on effects of thermal resistance and thermal buoyancy on oxygen flow Patterns during underground coal gasification. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 32977–32986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhutto, A.W.; Bazmi, A.A.; Zahedi, G. Underground coal gasification: From fundamentals to applications. J. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2013, 39, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.Q.; Shi, S.Z.; Feng, G.X.; Feng, J.; Li, M.X.; Guo, W. Geological site selection and evaluation for underground coal gasification. J. China Coal Soc. 2019, 8, 2531–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, W.; Liu, H.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Guo, T. Research on the expansion law of combustion cavity in deep coal seam underground gasification based on multi-physics field simulations and response surface method. Energy 2025, 326, 136287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, L.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhao, Y.; Hao, X.; Xu, C. Precision exploitation and utilization of closed/abandoned mine resources in China. J. China Coal Soc. 2018, 43, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, Y.; Yang, B.; Hou, Y.; Duan, T.-H.; Yang, L.; Wang, Y. Comparative environmental benefits of power generation from underground and surface coal gasification with carbon capture and storage. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 310, 127383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, F.Q.; Itakura, K.I.; Deguchi, G.; Ohga, K. Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques. Appl. Energy 2017, 189, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falshtynskyi, V.S.; Dychkovskyi, R.O.; Lozynskyi, V.G.; Saik, P.B. Determination of the technological parameters of borehole under-ground coal gasification for thin coal seams. J. Sustain. Min. 2013, 12, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.L.; Chen, Z.X.; Farouq Ali, S.M. Feasibility of carbon dioxide storage in post-burn underground coal gasification cavities. Appl. Energy 2019, 252, 113479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frejowski, A.; Bondaruk, J.; Duda, A. Challenges and opportunities for end-of-life coal mine sites: Black-to-green energy APPROACH. Energies 2021, 14, 1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, C.; Li, H.; Guo, G.; Cao, J.; Zha, J.; Li, R. A new paradigm for safe and accurate design of underground coal gasification coal pillars based on physics-informed neural networks. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2025, 160, 111957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Tian, J.; Yang, S.; Zou, J.; Wei, B.; Li, X.; Tong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, C. Research review of underground coal gasification: Principles, challenges and prospects. Fuel 2026, 406, 136823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durucan, S.; Korre, A.; Shi, J.Q.; Idiens, M.; Stańczyk, K.; Kapusta, K.; Mastalerz, M. Tops: Technology options for coupled underground coal gasification and CO2 capture and storage. Energy Procedia 2014, 63, 5827–5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, C.; Chen, Y.; Kong, L.; Sun, F.; Chen, S.; Dong, Z. Underground coal gasification and its strategic significance to the development of natural gas industry in China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2019, 46, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Xiao, Y.; Luo, G.; Fang, C.; Zou, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Yao, H. Numerical simulation study on chemical ignition process of underground coal gasification. Energy 2024, 298, 131350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandelle, V.; Jacquemin, C.; Létolle, R.; Mostade, M.; Pirard, J.-P.; Somers, Y. Underground coal gasification on the thulin site: Results of analysis from post-burn drillings. Fuel 1993, 72, 949–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Xin, L.; Xu, Z.; Gui, J.; Lu, X. Temperature field distribution and parametric study in underground coal gasification stope. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2017, 111, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekneligoda, T.; Marshall, A. A coupled thermal-mechanical numerical model of underground coal gasification (UCG) including spontaneous coal combustion and its effects. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2018, 199, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Cao, J.; Tang, C.; Guo, G.; Chen, Y.; Zha, J.; Huang, W.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, J. Methods for enhancing resource recovery efficiency in underground coal gasification to promote its large-scale utilization. Geomech. Energy Environ. 2025, 41, 100651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabu, V.; Jayanti, S. Simulation of cavity formation in underground coal gasification using bore hole combustion experiments. Energy 2011, 36, 5854–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Bai, J.W.; Feng, G.R.; Yilmaz, E.; Han, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, G. Degradation mechanism of coal pillars in an underground coal gasification environment: Bearing capacity, pyrolysis behaviour and pore structure. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2025, 35, 897–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Wang, S.; Qiao, M.; Duan, Y.; Chen, W.; Li, J.; Li, Y. Experiment and simulation assessment of supercritical underground coal gasification in deep coal seam. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 79, 974–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, A.K.; Islam, R.; Habib, A. An analytical investigation of critical factors to prioritize coalfields for underground coal gasification—Bangladesh case. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngo, D.; Pellet, F. Numerical modeling of thermally-induced fractures in a large rock salt mass. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2018, 10, 844–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Liu, J.; Xin, L.; Fan, J.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; Cheng, W.; Sui, J.; Niu, M. Numerical simulation of temperature field evolution and distribution range during movement of underground coal gasification working face. Energies 2025, 18, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafarian, M.; Haseli, P.; Saxena, S.; Dally, B. Emerging technologies for catalytic gasification of petroleum residue derived fuels for sustainable and cleaner fuel production—An overview. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 3248–3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Djordjevic, N. Thermal stress FEM analysis of rock with microwave energy. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2014, 130, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, P.; Liu, J.; Elsworth, D. Numerical study on a multifracture enhanced geothermal system considering matrix permeability enhancement induced by thermal unloading. Renew. Energy 2023, 203, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.P.; Bi, J. Numerical Simulation of thermal cracking in rocks based on general particle dynamics. J. Eng. Mech. 2017, 144, 04017156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, P.; Liang, X.; Gao, F.; Dong, J.; He, J.; Xue, Y. Quantitative visualization and characteristics of gas flow in 3D pore-fracture system of tight rock based on Lattice Boltzmann simulation. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2021, 89, 103867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Chen, Z.; Ali, S.F. General hydro-geological impact of cleats on underground coal gasification. Fuel 2018, 224, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, C.; Liu, Y.; Chai, X.; Tian, L. Investigation on performance characteristics and thermal analysis of underground coal gasification in porous media based on non-steady flow. Fuel 2025, 389, 134629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.D. Experimental and Numerical Simulation Research on Temperature and Cracks of Overlying Rock for Underground Coal Gasification; China University of Mining and Technology: Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, T.-H.; Zhang, J.-M.; Mallett, C.; Li, H.-H.; Huo, L.-W.; Zhao, K.-T. Numerical simulation of coupled thermal-mechanical fracturing in underground coal gasification. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy 2018, 232, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Yang, X.; Shang, X.; Yang, H. A Thermal-hydrological-mechanical-chemical coupled mathematical model for underground coal gasification with random fractures. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.R.; Zhang, Q.H.; Yuan, L. A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis. Energy 2024, 293, 130614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, X.; Li, X.; Wei, B.; Tian, J.; Yang, S.; Ju, Y. Numerical simulations of fracture propagation in overlying strata for deep underground coal gasification using controlled retraction injection point technology. Energy 2025, 317, 134684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Xu, G. The design of ignition systems and a study of the development of the high temperature zone in well-type underground coal gasification. Fuel 2020, 269, 117281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, F.-Q.; Yang, J.-N.; He, X.-L.; Dai, M.-J.; Hamanaka, A.; Yu, Y.H.; Li, W.; Li, J.-Y. Influences of removable gas injection methods on the temperature field and gas composition of the underground coal gasification process. Fuel 2024, 363, 130953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quan, F.; Lu, W.; Song, Y.; Sheng, W.; Qin, Z.; Luo, H. Multifractal characterization of heterogeneous pore water redistribution and its influence on permeability during depletion: Insights from centrifugal NMR analysis. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]













| Project | Value | Project | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model length/width | 600 m/500 m | Gasification channel length | 400 m |
| Coal seam thickness | 30 m | Grid size | 5 m × 5 m |
| Burial depth of coal seam midpoint along the gasification channel | 887 m | Gasification advance rate | 1 m/d |
| Total number of grids | 14,669 | Multi-physics coupling | temperature-stress- displacement-fracture |
| Lithology | Density Ρ (kg/m3) | Poisson’s Ratio ν | Elastic Modulus E(GPa) | Thermal Expansion Coefficient αt (10−6·K−1) | Thermal Conductivity λ(W/(m∙K)) | Specific Heat Capacity Cp(J/(Kg∙K)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coal seam | 1306 * | 0.26 * | 5.92 * | 5 * | 0.26 * | 1188 * |
| Sandstone | 2650 * | 0.17 * | 1.68 * | 6 * | 2.9 * | 860 * |
| Mudstone | 2780 * | 0.16 * | 2.78 * | 9 * | 1.2 * | 750 * |
| Burnout Distances (m) | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of fractures | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Maximum height of fractures (m) | 122.22 | 188.89 | 197.78 | 204.44 |
| Average height of fractures (m) | 93.33 | 157.03 | 164.89 | 172 |
| Maximum subsidence displacement (m) | 0.68 | 1.43 | 2.08 | 3.29 |
| Maximum temperature influence range (m) | 26.67 | 27.22 | 27.78 | 28.89 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Sang, S. Underground Coal Gasification Induced Multi-Physical Field Evolution and Overlying Strata Fracture Propagation: A Case Study Targeting Deep Steeply Inclined Coal Seams. Energies 2026, 19, 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19020559
Li J, Yang S, Wang Z, Zhang B, Li X, Sang S. Underground Coal Gasification Induced Multi-Physical Field Evolution and Overlying Strata Fracture Propagation: A Case Study Targeting Deep Steeply Inclined Coal Seams. Energies. 2026; 19(2):559. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19020559
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Jing, Shuguang Yang, Ziqiang Wang, Bin Zhang, Xin Li, and Shuxun Sang. 2026. "Underground Coal Gasification Induced Multi-Physical Field Evolution and Overlying Strata Fracture Propagation: A Case Study Targeting Deep Steeply Inclined Coal Seams" Energies 19, no. 2: 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19020559
APA StyleLi, J., Yang, S., Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Li, X., & Sang, S. (2026). Underground Coal Gasification Induced Multi-Physical Field Evolution and Overlying Strata Fracture Propagation: A Case Study Targeting Deep Steeply Inclined Coal Seams. Energies, 19(2), 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19020559

