Next Article in Journal
A Double Closed-Loop Steady-State Error Compensation Strategy for Grid-Forming Converters Using the Deadbeat Predictive Control Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Voltage Changes in a Medium-Voltage Distribution Network Caused by the Connection of a Wind Farm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Hydrodynamic Connectivity and Compartmentalization of Petroleum Reservoirs Based on Oil Fingerprinting

by
Sarkulova Zhadyrassyn
1,2,*,
Orazbekova Riza
1,*,
Gusmanova Aigul
3,4,*,
Karazhanova Maral
3,4,
Issengaliyeva Gulya
5,
Shayakhmetov Saulet
6,
Sarsenbekov Nariman
7 and
Bazilevskaya Ekaterina
2
1
Department of Oil and Gas Industry, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
3
Department of Geology and Petrochemical Engineering, Yessenov University, Aktau 130000, Kazakhstan
4
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
5
Department of Ecology, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan
6
Department of Construction and Building Materials, Kazakh National Research Technical University named after K.I. Satbayev NPJSC, Satbayev University, 22a Satpaev Street, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
7
Atyrau Branch of KMG Engineering LLP, Building 10, Elorda Avenue, Nursaya, Atyrau 060097, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(14), 3254; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143254
Submission received: 4 June 2026 / Revised: 2 July 2026 / Accepted: 4 July 2026 / Published: 10 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section B: Energy and Environment)

Abstract

This study presents an assessment of the hydrodynamic connectivity and compartmentalization of petroleum reservoirs in the Caspian Basin using integrated oil fingerprinting and biomarker geochemistry approaches. The aim of the study was to identify inter-reservoir fluid communication, reconstruct hydrocarbon migration pathways, and determine the factors controlling the geochemical heterogeneity of reservoir systems. The investigation was based on the analysis of 43 oil samples collected from 15 fields within the Caspian Basin using gas chromatography, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, carbon isotope analysis, and multivariate statistical methods, including principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis. The results revealed the presence of both hydrodynamically connected reservoirs characterized by similar molecular and biomarker compositions and compartmentalized reservoir blocks showing significant geochemical differences and variations in thermal maturity. It was established that the internal heterogeneity of the reservoirs is controlled by tectonic segmentation, multi-stage hydrocarbon migration, and differences in source rock characteristics. The obtained results confirm the effectiveness of oil fingerprinting methods for diagnosing hydrodynamic connectivity and reservoir compartmentalization in complex petroleum systems.

1. Introduction

The study of petroleum systems is one of the key directions of modern petroleum geology and organic geochemistry, as it makes it possible to reconstruct the processes of hydrocarbon generation, migration, and accumulation, as well as to evaluate the characteristics of the formation and internal architecture of oil and gas accumulations [1,2]. The petroleum system concept considers the relationship between source rocks, migration pathways, reservoirs, and traps as a single natural system that controls the distribution patterns of hydrocarbons within sedimentary basins [1,2].
The development of organic geochemistry has significantly expanded the possibilities for studying petroleum systems through the use of biomarkers, isotopic characteristics, and molecular indicators, which enable the determination of oil genetic types, source rock depositional conditions, thermal maturity of organic matter, and the migration history of hydrocarbons [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Over recent decades, geochemical methods have become important tools not only for regional studies of petroleum basins but also for solving practical problems related to field development and reservoir management [5,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
A special place in reservoir geochemistry is occupied by oil fingerprinting, which is based on the comparative analysis of the molecular composition of crude oils. This approach makes it possible to identify hydrocarbon mixing and fractionation processes, establish the genetic relationships between oils, reconstruct fluid migration pathways, and assess the degree of reservoir connectivity [5,13,15]. The development of high-resolution analytical techniques, including multidimensional gas chromatography and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, has significantly improved the accuracy of geochemical correlations and the reliability of interpreting intra-reservoir and inter-reservoir connections [3,13].
Additional information on the origin and evolution of oils is provided by biomarker analysis, which is widely used to investigate depositional environments, source rock lithology, thermal maturity of organic matter, and secondary hydrocarbon migration processes [3,4,8,9]. The integration of fingerprinting and biomarker data allows for a more reliable assessment of genetic relationships among oils, identification of mixed petroleum charges, and characterization of the formation and evolution of reservoir systems [13,15,16].
In recent years, geochemical methods have been increasingly applied to reservoir production monitoring, evaluation of inter-reservoir fluid communication, assessment of reservoir connectivity, and identification of reservoir compartmentalization [5,13,14,15,16]. Such studies are particularly important in structurally complex petroleum basins characterized by multistage hydrocarbon migration, tectonic segmentation, and the presence of multiple petroleum systems [17,18,19].
The Pre-Caspian Basin is one of the largest petroleum-bearing regions of Eurasia and is characterized by a complex geological structure, intensive salt tectonics, an extensive fault network, and a multi-level petroleum-bearing architecture [17,18]. Geochemical investigations of Kazakhstan oils indicate the existence of different genetic types of hydrocarbons associated with multiple source rock systems and multistage hydrocarbon migration processes [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Previous studies have demonstrated the high effectiveness of oil fingerprinting and biomarker analysis for the genetic classification of oils, reconstruction of hydrocarbon migration pathways, and development of regional geochemical models within the Pre-Caspian, Mangyshlak, South Torgay, and Ustyurt petroleum basins [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].
Despite the considerable amount of accumulated data [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], issues related to reservoir connectivity and compartmentalization within individual structures and petroleum-bearing complexes of the Pre-Caspian Basin remain insufficiently studied. Under conditions of complex tectonic architecture and pronounced geochemical heterogeneity of oils, the application of an integrated approach based on oil fingerprinting, biomarker analysis, and multivariate statistical data processing becomes particularly relevant.
The results demonstrate the presence of distinct oil families and varying degrees of reservoir compartmentalization controlled by tectonic segmentation and migration pathways. The study provides new insights into the internal architecture and fluid communication of petroleum reservoirs in the southern Pre-Caspian Basin.
The aim of this study is to evaluate reservoir connectivity and compartmentalization of petroleum reservoirs in the southern part of the Pre-Caspian Basin based on the results of oil fingerprinting, biomarker analysis, and statistical interpretation of geochemical parameters. The obtained results provide new insights into the internal architecture of reservoir systems, reveal the nature of inter-reservoir fluid communication, and assess the influence of geological factors on the distribution of hydrocarbons within the study area.

Geological Setting and Petroleum Potential of the Study Area

The Pre-Caspian Basin represents one of the largest petroleum-bearing basins in Eurasia and constitutes a complex sedimentary system formed as a result of prolonged tectonic evolution, multi-stage sedimentation, and successive processes of hydrocarbon generation, migration, and accumulation. The basin is located in the western part of Kazakhstan and is characterized by a thick Paleozoic–Mesozoic sedimentary cover, complex structural architecture, and high petroleum potential.
The study area covers the southern part of the Pre-Caspian Basin and includes 15 oil fields distributed across different structural and tectonic zones of the basin. A total of 43 oil samples were collected from the Aktobe, Dosmukhambetovskoye, Eastern Saztyube, Kalamkas, Karaton, Karasor, Karazhanbas, Kashagan, Kisimbay, Korolevskoye, North Nurzhanov, Tengiz, Teren-Uzyuk, West Yelemes, and West Prorva oil fields. These fields occur within various tectonic settings, including uplifted zones, subsided basin sectors, fault-bounded structural blocks, and areas affected by salt tectonics. The reservoirs are characterized by differences in lithology, structural configuration, hydrocarbon charge history, and reservoir properties, providing an opportunity to evaluate the influence of geological factors on hydrodynamic connectivity and reservoir compartmentalization.
The spatial distribution of the studied oil fields relative to the major structural elements, fault systems, salt domes, and inferred hydrocarbon migration pathways of the southern Pre-Caspian Basin is presented in Figure 1. The investigated area is influenced by the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift system, regional fault networks, and widespread salt tectonic structures, which play an important role in controlling hydrocarbon migration, trapping mechanisms, and fluid communication between reservoirs.
From a structural perspective, the investigated territory is confined to the southern part of the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift zone and includes the Karaton–Tengiz uplift zone, the Biikzhal regional high, and adjacent structures of the North Caspian structural domain. The Karaton–Tengiz uplift zone is located on the southern flank of the Biikzhal high and comprises the Karaton, Tengiz, and North Kultuk structural blocks, which progressively deepen southward.
The Karaton–Tengiz uplift is characterized by the predominant development of Late Devonian–Early Carboniferous carbonate petroleum systems. The formation of these deposits occurred within a shallow marine environment, promoting the development of carbonate platforms and highly productive reservoir systems. Major fields such as Tengiz, Karaton, and adjacent hydrocarbon accumulations are associated with this structural zone.
The Biikzhal arch represents a complex assemblage of sedimentary formations comprising both terrigenous and carbonate reservoirs. This region is characterized by significant lithofacies variability, heterogeneity of reservoir properties, and structural complications that influence hydrocarbon distribution and accumulation patterns.
The North Caspian structural domain is characterized by a complex geological framework and widespread development of various petroleum-bearing complexes. Within this area, the Kalamkas and Karazhanbas fields are geographically located within the Buzachi uplift; however, they were included in the present study due to their regional significance and their importance for comparative geochemical evaluation of oils from western Kazakhstan.
One of the most distinctive features of the Pre-Caspian Basin is the widespread development of salt tectonics associated with the thick Kungurian evaporite sequence of Permian age. Halokinetic processes resulted in the formation of numerous salt domes, diapirs, and salt walls, which significantly modified the initial architecture of the sedimentary cover. The growth of salt structures was accompanied by the formation of local uplifts, zones of enhanced fracturing, and fault systems that controlled the distribution of hydrocarbon traps and the spatial arrangement of petroleum accumulations.
The tectonic framework of the study area is complicated by a system of regional and local faults that exert a significant influence on hydrocarbon migration and reservoir hydrodynamic connectivity. Depending on their development and properties, faults may act either as pathways facilitating vertical and lateral hydrocarbon migration or as sealing barriers responsible for the formation of isolated reservoir compartments. The combined influence of salt tectonics and faulting resulted in the development of a complex, multi-level petroleum accumulation system within the southern part of the Pre-Caspian Basin.
Hydrocarbon migration is interpreted to have occurred through a combination of vertical and lateral pathways. Vertical migration was controlled by fault zones and fractured intervals formed due to tectonic deformation and halokinetic activity, whereas lateral migration occurred mainly along permeable carbonate and terrigenous reservoir units. The interaction between source rocks, migration pathways, salt structures, and fault systems resulted in the formation of hydrocarbon accumulations characterized by different degrees of hydrodynamic connectivity and distinct geochemical signatures.
Therefore, the structural–tectonic evolution, salt tectonics, fault development, and hydrocarbon migration processes played a fundamental role in controlling petroleum accumulation within the southern part of the Pre-Caspian Basin. These factors define the present-day reservoir architecture and the degree of compartmentalization and provide the geological framework for interpreting the results of oil fingerprinting, biomarker analysis, and multivariate statistical evaluation performed in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

Sampling and Preparation of Oil Samples. This study presents the results of geochemical analysis of 43 crude oil samples collected from productive horizons in the southern part of the Pre-Caspian Basin. The investigated samples cover various stratigraphic levels and oil accumulation zones.
The main physicochemical properties of the investigated crude oils, including density, specific gravity, and dynamic viscosity, are summarized in Table 1.
Sampling, transportation, and preparation of crude oil samples for analysis were performed in accordance with established laboratory procedures and the requirements of GOST 2517-2012. After collection, the samples were placed in airtight containers to prevent secondary alterations of oil composition and the loss of light hydrocarbon fractions (Figure 2).
Prior to analytical investigations, the oil samples underwent standard laboratory preparation, including fraction separation and the addition of an internal standard 5-methyl-3-heptanone (ISTD). 5-methyl-3-heptanone was used as a chromatographic performance control compound. The standard n-alkane mixture included hydrocarbons in the C6–C15 range, ensuring proper calibration of component retention times.
Oil Fingerprinting Analysis. Oil fingerprinting was performed using a multidimensional low thermal mass gas chromatography system (LTM-MD-GC) equipped with two flame ionization detectors (FID), enabling simultaneous detection of aliphatic and aromatic fractions of crude oil.
The schematic diagram and operating principle of the LTM–MD–GC system are presented in Figure 3.
Geochemical analyses were carried out in the Laboratory of Geochemical Studies of Oil, Water, and Rocks at KMG Engineering LLP using an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) gas chromatograph in accordance with approved analytical methodologies.
The LTM-MD-GC method is based on a two-stage separation of oil components. In the valve-off mode, n-alkanes passed through a DB-1 capillary column (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) column and were recorded by the rear FID. In the valve-on mode, diagnostic aromatic compounds of crude oil, including 11 compounds within the C8–C10 range (ethylbenzene, o-xylene, m-xylene, p-xylene, isopropylbenzene, n-propylbenzene, 2-ethyltoluene, 3-ethyltoluene, 4-ethyltoluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene), were directed to a DB-Wax column and detected by the front flame ionization detector (Front FID). This approach enables the selective separation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons within a single analytical cycle.
For the qualitative and quantitative characterization of crude oils, 5-methyl-3-heptanone was added to each sample prior to LTM-MD-GC analysis as an internal standard. A standard n-alkane mixture covering the C6–C15 range was used for calibration and component identification. Based on the obtained chromatograms, the retention times of n-alkanes in the C8–C10 range were determined and used to establish the corresponding retention time windows required for accurate configuration and operation of the multidimensional gas chromatography method.
The retention times of components were determined by their molecular weight and boiling point: lower-molecular-weight compounds eluted earlier than heavier fractions.
The structures and chemical formulas of diagnostic aromatic compounds used for constructing fingerprint profiles are presented in Figure 4. These compounds serve as molecular markers and provide the basis for inter-well and inter-reservoir oil correlation.
The interpretation of the results was based on the relative abundances of 11 diagnostic aromatic compounds in the C8–C10 range, including ethylbenzene, o-xylene, m-xylene, p-xylene, propylbenzene, ethylmethylbenzenes, and trimethylbenzenes.
The obtained data were used to construct molecular profiles and radar (spider) plots for oil-to-oil correlation among wells, reservoirs, and fields. Statistical approaches are increasingly applied in engineering research for the quantitative interpretation of complex datasets and decision support [38].
All samples were analyzed in duplicate to ensure reproducibility of the results. The analytical error for non-biodegraded oils was less than 1%, which confirms the high analytical reliability of the LTM-MD-GC method for oil fingerprinting and reservoir geochemistry applications.
GC–MS Biomarker Analysis. Biomarker analysis of crude oil samples was conducted using an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph coupled with a 5977B mass selective detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (Figure 5).
Organic compounds were separated on a DB-1 capillary column (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness). High-purity helium (99.999%) was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 2.0 mL/min. The operational temperature range of the column was 0–350 °C. Mass spectrometric analyses were performed in electron ionization (EI) mode at an ionization energy of 70 eV. Initial mass spectral acquisition was carried out in full-scan (SCAN) mode over the m/z range of 50–550.
Biomarker compounds were identified using selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Terpanes were analyzed using the diagnostic ion m/z 191, whereas steranes were monitored using the diagnostic ions m/z 217 and m/z 218. The obtained mass spectra were interpreted based on characteristic diagnostic ions and comparison with reference library spectra.
Biomarker identification, including n-alkanes, isoprenoid hydrocarbons, steranes, and terpanes, was performed using published literature data and diagnostic mass fragments characteristic of the corresponding compound classes.
The analysis was undertaken to evaluate the genetic characteristics of the oils, depositional environments of the source rocks, lithological characteristics of the organic matter source, thermal maturity, and potential hydrocarbon migration pathways.
Aromatic compounds were identified based on 11 diagnostic aromatic compounds determined by GC–MS analysis. The internal standard 5-methyl-3-heptanone (ISTD) was used for quality control and quantitative normalization of chromatographic data. The list of analyzed aromatic compounds and the internal standard is presented in Table 2.
For interpretation, the distributions of steranes, diasteranes, terpanes, methyldibenzothiophenes, and methylphenanthrenes were used. Terpane analysis was performed using the m/z 191 ion, while sterane analysis was conducted using the m/z 217 ion in SIM mode.
Oil thermal maturity was assessed using sterane and terpane isomerization parameters, including C29 ααα 20S/(20S + 20R), C29 ββ/(ββ + αα), and Ts/Tm ratios, as well as aromatic maturity indicators MPI-1 and 4MDBT/1MDBT.
To evaluate depositional environments and the lithology of source rocks, sterane and terpane homolog distribution parameters were used, including C27–C28–C29 steranes, C29Hopane/C30Hopane, C24Tet/26TT, and 23TT/24TT ratios.
Statistical Analysis. To assess the genetic relationships between oils and to identify patterns in the distribution of geochemical parameters, multivariate statistical methods were applied, including principal component analysis (PCA) and Ward’s hierarchical clustering.
Statistical processing was performed using a set of biomarker parameters, including facies-genetic and catagenetic indicators. The analysis considered thermal maturity parameters, biomarker distributions, and ratios of aromatic compounds.
PCA was used to visualize similarities and differences among oils based on a combined set of geochemical features, whereas Ward’s dendrograms were applied to identify genetically related oil families and to evaluate the degree of their geochemical similarity.
Prior to PCA, all geochemical variables were standardized using Z-score transformation (autoscaling), whereby the mean value of each parameter was set to zero and the standard deviation to one. This procedure eliminated the influence of differences in the scale and range of variation among variables.
Cluster analysis was performed using hierarchical agglomerative clustering with Ward’s linkage method and Euclidean distance as a measure of similarity between samples. The resulting dendrograms were used to identify genetically related oil families and to evaluate the degree of their geochemical similarity.
Prior to statistical analysis, the dataset was screened for potential outliers. Outlier detection was carried out using boxplot analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). Samples that fell within the confidence limits and did not exert a significant influence on the overall data structure were retained in the final dataset. No samples were excluded from the statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Interpretation of Oil Fingerprinting Results

The results of oil fingerprinting obtained using multidimensional low thermal mass gas chromatography (LTM-MD-GC) demonstrate significant variability in the molecular composition of crude oils from 15 fields of the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift system. The molecular “fingerprint” approach allows identification of both genetically related petroleum systems and zones of pronounced reservoir compartmentalization.
The general conceptual model of hydrocarbon migration and reservoir filling based on fingerprinting results is presented in Figure 6, where possible directions of fluid flow, oil mixing processes, and the formation of reservoir systems with varying degrees of isolation are illustrated.
For interpretation of the molecular composition, gas chromatography and LTM-MD-GC analytical data were used. A typical chromatogram of a representative crude oil sample and the corresponding oil fingerprinting result in the form of a “radar” (spider) diagram are presented in Figure 7. This approach allows simultaneous evaluation of the distribution of diagnostic aromatic compounds and their ratios, reflecting the unique characteristics of the oil.
Based on the distribution of diagnostic aromatic compounds, all studied fields were conditionally divided into three main genetic groups corresponding to the major structural elements of the region. The first group includes the fields of the Karaton–Tengiz uplift. The fingerprinting results of this group are presented in Figure 8, where both pronounced similarities and local differences in molecular “fingerprints” are observed.
The similarity in the shapes of radar diagrams for individual fields, such as S. Nurzhanov and West Prorva, indicates a probable common petroleum system and possible hydrodynamic connectivity. In contrast, differences between neighboring fields (Aktobe, Dosmukhambetovskoye, and Karasor) suggest the presence of tectonic barriers, fault segmentation, and processes of secondary oil fractionation.
A similar analysis was carried out for fields related to the Biikzhal uplift. The results are presented in Figure 9. This group is characterized by a high degree of fingerprint heterogeneity, reflecting the complex structure of reservoir systems and the influence of tectonic factors.
Both matching molecular profiles of certain field pairs (for example, B. Zholamanov and North Kotyrtas) and pronounced differences between closely located fields are observed. This may indicate limited hydrodynamic connectivity or the presence of fault-related barriers.
For fields of the North Caspian structural area, the fingerprinting results are presented in Figure 10. This group is characterized by the highest geochemical heterogeneity, reflecting a complex combination of migration, mixing, and reservoir compartmentalization processes.
Individual fields exhibit similar molecular characteristics, which may indicate a common hydrocarbon source or closely connected migration pathways. However, significant variations between individual wells suggest multiphase filling processes and local isolation of productive horizons.

3.2. Biomarker Characteristics and Genetic Typing of Oils

Biomarker analysis confirms that the studied oils were formed from different types of organic matter under varying depositional conditions, reflecting a complex evolution of source-rock systems within the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift zone. The distribution of C27–C28–C29 steranes indicates a predominance of marine origin for most samples, suggesting the dominance of marine planktonic organic matter in the original sediments.
The similarity of sterane profiles in oils from the Tengiz, Karaton, and Teren-Uzuk fields indicates their genetic relationship despite differences in stratigraphic levels. This suggests the presence of a common or closely related organic matter source and a shared evolution of source rocks within a unified petroleum system.
Figure 11 presents the distributions of C27–C28–C29 steranes in the studied crude oils. The analysis showed that all investigated samples are predominantly derived from marine organic matter; however, variations in the C27/C28/C29 ratios are observed, reflecting differences in depositional facies conditions and the contribution of different bioproductivity sources.
The oils from the Tengiz, Karaton, and Teren-Uzuk fields are characterized by an almost identical sterane distribution despite differences in the ages of the productive horizons, which may indicate their genetic equivalence and belonging to a single petroleum system. It has also been established that with increasing burial depth of productive horizons, the contribution of marine organic matter increases, which is especially typical for Triassic and Devonian deposits, reflecting more reducing depositional conditions and better preservation of lipid material.

3.3. Terpane Distribution and Source Rock Properties

The distribution of terpanes according to the m/z 191 ion (Figure 12) allowed the determination of lithological characteristics of the source rocks. Interpretation of the hopane series parameters is a key indicator of depositional environments and source rock type.
For most studied oils, high values of the C29Hopane/C30Hopane ratio (29H/30H > 1) are characteristic, indicating an increased bacterial input and carbonate depositional settings. Elevated concentrations of C24 tetracyclic terpanes (C24Tet/26TT > 1) and the predominance of C23 over C24 tricyclic terpanes (23TT/24TT > 1.5) reflect specific diagenetic conditions in carbonate environments with limited terrigenous input. High C35 homohopane values further confirm the reducing nature of the depositional environment and the high preservation potential of organic matter.
Taken together, these parameters clearly indicate a predominantly carbonate origin of the source rock intervals. In contrast, oil from the Akkuduk field exhibits opposite geochemical characteristics, reflecting a significant contribution of terrigenous organic matter, which confirms the presence of multiple independent oil sources within the region.

3.4. Thermal Maturity of Oils

To assess the thermal maturity of the oils, sterane and terpane isomerization parameters were used, which reflect the degree of progressive evolution of organic matter under catagenetic conditions. Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17 present the ratios of sterane and terpane isomers, illustrating different stages of organic matter maturity.
It was established that oils from the Tengiz, Karaton, Korolevskoye, Teren-Uzyuk, and Kashagan fields correspond to the late stage of oil generation, indicating their formation under conditions of maximum thermal exposure and complete passage through the “oil window”. Oils from the Karasor and Dosmukhambetovskoye fields are characterized by an early maturity stage, which may indicate a lower thermal history or shallower burial depth of the source rocks. Oils from the Aktobe, S. Nurzhanov, and West Elemes fields correspond to the peak oil generation stage, reflecting optimal conditions for hydrocarbon generation.
The obtained results are of significant importance for reconstructing hydrocarbon migration pathways and assessing reservoir hydrodynamic connectivity. The higher thermal maturity of oils from the Aktobe field compared to the Dosmukhambetovskoye field, despite their high biomarker similarity, may indicate directed lateral migration of hydrocarbons from more deeply buried or more thermally mature zones toward the Dosmukhambetovskoye field. This pattern suggests the possible existence of a hydrodynamically connected fluid system with a maturity gradient.

3.5. Migration Indicators and Aromatic Parameters

Additional information on migration processes was obtained from aromatic hydrocarbons. Figure 18 presents the relationship between the methylphenanthrene index (MPI-1) and the 4MDBT/1MDBT ratio. These parameters differ in their sensitivity to thermal evolution and migration processes: MPI-1 primarily reflects thermal maturity, whereas 4MDBT/1MDBT is sensitive to migration distance and the fractionation of aromatic compounds.
The interpretation of these parameters allowed the identification of probable hydrocarbon migration pathways and the delineation of fluid systems with different degrees of hydrodynamic communication.

3.6. Hydrocarbon Migration Indicators and Aromatic Parameters

The results of PCA and Ward’s dendrogram clustering (Figure 19 and Figure 20) revealed the presence of several genetically distinct oil families. Oils from the Tengiz, Karaton, Korolevskoye, Kashagan, and Teren-Uzyuk fields form a separate cluster characterized by high thermal maturity, a similar genetic signal, and a common type of source rock.
In contrast, oils from the Aktobe, Dosmukhambetovskoye, and West Elemes fields form a compact group with a high positive correlation, which may indicate their belonging to a single petroleum system and the presence of inter-reservoir fluid communication.
Visual comparison of mass fragmentograms m/z 217 and m/z 191 (Figure 21, Figure 22, Figure 23 and Figure 24) confirmed a high degree of similarity between certain groups of oils. In particular, the distributions of steranes and diasteranes in the Aktobe, Dosmukhambetovskoye, and Elemes oils are very close, indicating a common genetic source.
At the same time, the Karasor and Kisimbay oils show significant differences, suggesting the presence of different source rocks or varying degrees of secondary alteration.
Of particular interest is the detection of the 19TT peak in the Karasor oil, which is also characteristic of oils from Paleozoic formations, potentially indicating a more ancient source of organic matter.

3.7. Comparative Analysis of Biomarker and Aromatic Distributions

The aromatic fractions (Figure 25 and Figure 26) demonstrate significant differences in the distribution of dibenzothiophenes and methylphenanthrenes. These variations may be attributed to a combination of factors, including biodegradation, differences in thermal maturity, and local reservoir compartmentalization, further confirming the complex fluid architecture of the region.

4. Discussion

The integration of oil fingerprinting and biomarker analysis data revealed patterns reflecting the complex internal organization of reservoir systems within the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift zone. The geochemical heterogeneity of the studied oils is controlled by the combined influence of source organic matter type, tectonic segmentation, and multi-stage processes of hydrocarbon generation, migration, and mixing.
Comparative analysis of biomarker parameters allowed the identification of two major genetic groups of oils associated with carbonate and clay-rich source rocks. At the same time, it was established that the genetic affiliation of oils does not always correspond to a single reservoir system, indicating possible fluid mixing processes and a complex migration history. Biomarker data primarily reflect the source characteristics and formation conditions of oils, whereas the spatial organization of fluid systems requires additional evaluation using oil fingerprinting techniques.
Analysis of oil fingerprinting results made it possible to refine the degree of fluid communication between fields and within individual structures. Within the Karaton–Tengiz uplift, a combination of genetically related and significantly different petroleum systems was identified. The similarity of molecular fingerprints of oils from the West Prorva and S. Nurzhanov fields suggests possible hydrodynamic connectivity and a common fluid source. In contrast, pronounced differences among oils from the Aktobe, Dosmukhambetovskoye, and Karasor structures indicate reservoir compartmentalization and the presence of isolated blocks. Particularly significant intra-reservoir variability observed within the Karasor structure suggests the existence of internal flow barriers.
Within the Biikzhal arch, a mosaic pattern of fluid systems was also recognized. Several pairs of fields, including B. Zholamanov–North Kotyrtas and Kulsary–East Makat, exhibit similar molecular characteristics, which may indicate hydrodynamic connectivity. At the same time, substantial differences among other fields reflect the influence of tectonic segmentation and local barriers to fluid migration.
The most complex pattern was observed within the North Caspian region, where both genetically similar petroleum systems (Liman, Gran, and S. Balgimbayev) and strongly differentiated fluid complexes occur simultaneously. This indicates multi-phase hydrocarbon migration, mixing of different petroleum charges, and the development of a complex reservoir architecture. The presence of multiple oil types within individual fields further confirms a high degree of reservoir compartmentalization and limited fluid connectivity.
The differences between the identified oil families are primarily controlled by the characteristics of the source rocks, the degree of thermal maturity of the organic matter, and the subsequent history of hydrocarbon migration. Oils associated with carbonate source rock intervals are characterized by biomarker assemblages indicating a predominantly marine origin of organic matter and its accumulation under relatively reducing conditions. In contrast, oils genetically related to clay-rich source rocks demonstrate a more significant contribution of mixed marine and terrestrial organic matter.
Variations in maturity-sensitive biomarker parameters indicate that hydrocarbon generation occurred at different stages of thermal evolution. More mature oils were likely generated in deeper and more thermally altered hydrocarbon kitchens, whereas less mature oils are associated with source rocks that experienced relatively lower burial depths.
An additional factor contributing to the observed geochemical heterogeneity was the occurrence of secondary hydrocarbon migration and mixing processes involving fluids derived from different petroleum source systems. This interpretation is supported by the presence of multiple oil types within individual reservoirs and oil fields.
The obtained results are in good agreement with previously published studies of petroleum basins within the Precaspian region, where multi-stage hydrocarbon migration, the existence of multiple petroleum source systems, and the significant role of tectonic segmentation in reservoir development have also been reported [17,18,22,23,24,29,32]. Previous studies have demonstrated that Devonian–Carboniferous carbonate and clay-rich source rock intervals acted as hydrocarbon sources for various petroleum systems within the region, resulting in substantial geochemical variability of oils. A similar pattern is observed in the present study, where the identified oil families reflect differences in the composition of source organic matter and its thermal maturity, whereas oil fingerprinting results reveal the influence of hydrocarbon migration, fluid mixing processes, and tectonic compartmentalization of reservoirs. Therefore, the obtained data not only support the existing regional concepts of petroleum system evolution in the Precaspian Basin but also provide a more detailed characterization of the spatial organization of reservoirs and the degree of hydrodynamic connectivity between them within the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift zone.
The integration of biomarker analysis and oil fingerprinting provides a more comprehensive reconstruction of the evolution of petroleum systems in the region. Biomarkers allow the determination of the genetic origin and formation conditions of oils, whereas fingerprinting reflects the degree of fluid communication and the spatial organization of reservoirs. The combined application of these methods enables a more reliable distinction between hydrodynamically connected and compartmentalized reservoir systems.
Thus, the petroleum systems of the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift zone represent a complex combination of hydrodynamically connected reservoirs with stable molecular characteristics and tectonically isolated systems exhibiting a high degree of geochemical heterogeneity. The formation of this structure is controlled by the combined influence of the regional tectonic framework, variations in the composition of source organic matter, and multi-stage processes of hydrocarbon generation, migration, and accumulation. In contrast to previous regional studies, the present work provides a more detailed characterization of fluid system organization at the reservoir scale through the integration of biomarker characteristics, reflecting the genetic nature of oils, and oil fingerprinting parameters, indicating the degree of fluid connectivity. This integrated approach enables the differentiation between geochemical signatures inherited from source petroleum systems and processes associated with subsequent hydrocarbon migration, fluid mixing, and tectonic reservoir compartmentalization.

Study Limitations

Despite the application of oil fingerprinting, biomarker analysis, and statistical data processing methods, several limitations of this study should be considered. The analysis is based on a limited dataset of oil samples collected from 15 fields within the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift zone; therefore, the identified genetic oil groups and conclusions regarding the degree of reservoir hydrodynamic connectivity may not fully represent the entire complexity of petroleum systems within the Pre-Caspian Basin.
The assessment of reservoir connectivity in this study was performed primarily based on geochemical and statistical criteria, which limits the interpretation in the absence of comprehensive integration with additional geological, geophysical, and production data. Furthermore, biomarker and oil fingerprinting parameters reflect the combined influence of source organic matter characteristics, thermal maturity, hydrocarbon migration processes, and secondary alteration, resulting in a certain degree of uncertainty in distinguishing the individual factors controlling the observed geochemical heterogeneity.
Further expansion of the dataset through the analysis of a larger number of samples, inclusion of additional fields, and integration with high-resolution geological and geophysical information will improve the reliability of interpretations and provide a more comprehensive understanding of petroleum system evolution within the Pre-Caspian Basin.

5. Conclusions

On the basis of the conducted comprehensive geochemical analysis of oils within the Pre-Caspian Basin, the following main conclusions were formulated:
  • The results of oil fingerprinting and biomarker analysis revealed the presence of several genetically distinct oil families within the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift system, indicating the complex organization and internal heterogeneity of petroleum systems in the studied region.
  • Most of the investigated oils are of predominantly marine origin and are associated with carbonate source rocks formed under reducing depositional conditions. The obtained data demonstrate the significant role of depositional environment and source organic matter characteristics in controlling the geochemical properties of oils.
  • The oils from the Tengiz, Karaton, Korolevskoye, Kashagan, and Teren-Uzyuk fields are characterized by similar geochemical parameters and are likely to belong to a single petroleum system. This suggests the commonality of hydrocarbon sources and similarity of their generation and migration processes.
  • Evidence of tectonically controlled reservoir compartmentalization has been identified, caused by fault segmentation and varying degrees of hydrodynamic connectivity of productive horizons.
  • The analysis of thermal maturity parameters and migration indicators indicates multi-stage hydrocarbon migration and the presence of several fluid migration pathways within the studied region.
  • The results of principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis confirmed the existence of distinct genetic oil groups and allowed the characterization of their relationships. Furthermore, these analyses helped identify the key factors controlling the geochemical heterogeneity of petroleum systems.
  • The scientific novelty of this study lies in the comprehensive assessment of oil genetic heterogeneity and reservoir hydrodynamic connectivity within the Astrakhan–Aktobe uplift system based on the integrated application of oil fingerprinting, biomarker analysis, and multivariate statistical methods. The obtained results provide new insights into the influence of tectonic segmentation and source rock characteristics on the formation and evolution of modern reservoir systems.
  • The practical significance of this study is associated with the potential application of the obtained results for improving petroleum reservoir models, evaluating the connectivity of productive horizons, predicting hydrocarbon migration pathways, and enhancing the efficiency of exploration and production decisions in complex carbonate reservoir systems.
  • The integrated application of oil fingerprinting, biomarker analysis, and statistical methods is an effective tool for assessing hydrodynamic connectivity, studying petroleum systems, and predicting hydrocarbon migration pathways.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z. and O.R.; Methodology, S.Z. and O.R.; Validation, G.A. and S.S.; Formal analysis, S.Z.; Investigation, S.Z., G.A., K.M. and S.N.; Resources, S.S. and S.N.; Data curation, G.A., K.M. and S.N.; Writing—original draft, S.Z.; Writing—review and editing, S.Z., O.R., I.G. and B.E.; Visualization, S.Z.; Supervision, O.R., I.G. and B.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Sarsenbekov Nariman was employed by the company Atyrau Branch, KazMunayGas (Kazakhstan), Astana, Kazakhstan. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tissot, B.; Welte, D. Petroleum Formation and Petroleum Formation and Occurrence; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1984; 699p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Magoon, L.B.; Dow, W.G. The Petroleum System: From Source to Trap; AAPG Memoir 60; American Association of Petroleum Geologists: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peters, K.E.; Walters, C.C.; Moldowan, J.M. The Biomarker Guide; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004; Volume 1: Biomarkers and Isotopes in the Environment and Human History. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abrams, M.A.; Narimanov, A.A. Geochemical evaluation of hydrocarbons and their potential sources in the western South Caspian depression, Republic of Azerbaijan. Mar. Pet. Geol. 1997, 14, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. England, W.A. Reservoir geochemistry—A reservoir engineering perspective. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2007, 58, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Allen, P.A.; Allen, J.R. Basin Analysis: Principles and Application to Petroleum Play Assessment; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; 632p, Available online: https://www.geokniga.org/books/39632 (accessed on 1 June 2026).
  7. Mei, M.; Katz, B. Geochemistry and Mineral Resources; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hamdy, D.; Ahmed, F.; Qteishat, A.; Arafat, M.; Farouk, S. Geochemical characteristics of the organic-rich Upper Cretaceous carbonates in northern Jordan: Implications for source rock evaluation and depositional settings. Pet. Geosci. 2026, 32, petgeo2024-099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fu, J.; Sheng, G.; Liu, D. Organic geochemical characteristics of major types of terrestrial petroleum source rocks in China. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1988, 40, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schengelaia, Y. Fundamentals of Petrophysics (Springer Geophysics), 2nd ed.; eBook; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; p. 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scott, A.S.; Allen, D.U.; Paul, D.B. Recognition of and Allocation Among Multiple Sources of PAH in Urban Sediments. Environ. Claims J. 2001, 13, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Sarsenbekov, N.D.; Rahymberdi, R.; Kairbekov, S.B. Geochemical surveys—The path to understanding the features of an oil field. Oil Gas Mag. 2019, 3, 21–33. [Google Scholar]
  13. Franco, P.; Sandoval, L.; Galimberti, R.; Garlichs, T.U.; Venieri, M.; Hughes, N. Reservoir Geochemistry for Production Monitoring and Field Management: A Case Study in the Norwegian Sea. In Proceedings of the 85th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition; European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers: Kosterijland, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarsenbekov, N.D.; Yakupova, E.N.; Kairbekov, S.B.; Seitkhaziyev, Y.S. The role of petroleum geochemistry in improving the efficiency of the development of multilayer oil and gas fields. SOCAR Proc. 2018, 3, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Larter, S.R.; Aplin, A.C. Reservoir geochemistry: Methods, applications and opportunities. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1995, 86, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carpentier, B.; Wilhelms, A.; Mansoori, G.A. Reservoir organic geochemistry: Processes and applications. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2007, 58, 341–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nurabayev, N.D. Geological Structure and Petroleum Systems of the Kazakhstan Sector of the Caspian Sea and the South Mangyshlak Sedimentary Basin. Kazakhstan J. Oil Gas Ind. 2024, 6, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feyzullayev, A.A. Migration Pathways of Hydracarbons in South-Caspian Basin. Geol. J. Geol. Geosci. 2013, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alimzhanova, M.; Abdykarimov, B. Analysis of Kazakhstan Crude Oil Biomarkers by Gas Chromatography in Combination with Mass Spectrometry. Separations 2023, 10, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S. Genetic typing of carbonate oil in the west of the southern part of the Caspian basin. SOCAR Proc. 2019, 2, 40–60. [Google Scholar]
  21. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S. Comprehensive Geochemical Study of Core and Cutting Samples from Postsalt Deposits of Southern Parts of Precaspian Basin and «Oil-Source Rocks» Correlation Studies. SOCAR Proc. 2020, 2, 30–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Uteyev, R.N.; Sarsenbekov, N.D.; Tassemenov, E.T.; Dosmukhambetov, A.K. Geochemical atlas of «Oil fingerprinting» for fields of «Embamunaygas» JSC. Kazakhstan J. Oil Gas Ind. 2020, 2, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Uteyev, R.N.; Mustafaev, M.K.; Liu, S.; Sarsenbekov, N.D. Fingerprinting and biomarker analysis of oil from Akshabulak group for determining oil types. Kazakhstan J. Oil Gas Ind. 2021, 3, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Uteyev, R.N.; Sarsenbekov, N.D. Application of biomarkers and oil fingerprinting for genetic classification of oil and prediction of petroleum migration pathways of Aryskum downfold of South-Torgay depression. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, 5–7 October 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Demeuova, A.; Amangeldiyeva, G.; Madisheva, R.; Seitkhaziyev, Y.S. Hydrocarbon Generation Potential of Mezozoic Petroleum System in Nuraly Deposit (South Torgay Basin, Kazakhstan). Iraqi Geol. J. 2025, 58, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nurmaganbetova, L.A.; Shestoperova, L.V. Geochemical characteristics of the oils of caspian basin according to the biomarker study. Natl. Assoc. Sci. (NAS) 2022, 84, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Uteyev, R.N.; Mustafaev, M.K.; Liu, S.; Sarsenbekov, N.D. Application of biomarkers and oil fingerprinting for genetic classification of oil families and prediction of oil migration pathways in Nuraly field. Kazakhstan J. Oil Gas Ind. 2021, 2, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Sarsenbekov, N.D. Interpretation of geochemical researches of oil and formation water of one particular oil field (Republic of Kazakhstan). Oil Gas Geol. Theory Pract. 2020, 15, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Sarsenbekov, N.D.; Uteyev, R.N. Geochemical atlas of oils and source rocks and oil-source rock correlations: A case study of oil and gas fields in the Mangyshlak basin (Kazakhstan). In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, 15–17 November 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Jarassova, T. Application of oil fingerprinting and biomarker analysis to study fluid connectivity and reservoir isolation and genetic typing of oil obtained from the Eastern Caspian Basin. In Proceedings of the SPE Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition, Atyrau, Kazakhstan, 26–28 November 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S. Geochemical studies of condensate, gas and core samples derived from gas-condensate fields in the moynkum sag (kazakhstan). News Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan 2023, 3, 242–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Sarsenbekov, N.D.; Uteyev, R.N. Application of Oil Fingerprinting and Biomarker Analysis for Reservoir Compartmentalization Studies and Genetic Typing of Oils from North Ustuyrt Oil and Gas Region. In Proceedings of the SPE Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition, Baku, Azerbaijan, 21–23 November 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Uteyev, R.N.; Sarsenbekov, N.D.; Tassemenov, Y.T. Integrating Biomarker Analysis with Carbon Stable Isotope Signatures for Genetic Classification and Tracing Possible Migration Pathways of Hydrocarbons of Pre Caspian Basin (Russian). In Annual Caspian Technical Conference; SPE: Richardson, TX, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Sarsenbekov, N.D.; Mukhametrakhimov, S.K. Special features of secondary migration of hydrocarbons of the southern part of the Caspian depression based on geochemical analysis of oils. In 29th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry; European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers: Kosterijland, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Yeltay, G.; Pangereeva, S.; Sarsenbekov, N.D. Qualitative allocation from comingled wells of Uzen field using geochemical fingerprinting. Oil Gas 2019, 4, 87–103. [Google Scholar]
  36. Seitkhaziyev, Y.S.; Ibagarov, M.K. Integrated geochemical investigations of gas condensate, gas and core of gas condensate fields of the Moyinkum trough (Republic of Kazakhstan). Neftegazov. Geol. Teor. Prakt. 2022, 17, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yessengaliyev, D.A.; Zhumagaliyev, Y.U.; Tazhibayev, A.A.; Bekbossynov, Z.A.; Sarkulova, Z.S.; Issengaliyeva, G.A.; Zhubandykova, Z.U.; Semenikhin, V.V.; Yeskalina, K.T.; Ansapov, A.E. Energy Efficiency Trends in Petroleum Extraction: A Bibliometric Study. Energies 2024, 17, 2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Uakhitova, B.T.; Zhokanov, R.A.; Sarkulova, Z.S.; Taizhigitova, M.M.; Kurbangaliyeva, N.B. Statistical analysis and quantification of risk dangers of injuries. News Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan Ser. Geol. Tech. Sci. 2023, 5, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural–tectonic framework of the southern Pre-Caspian Basin showing the major structural units, fault systems, salt domes, hydrocarbon migration pathways, and locations of the studied oil fields. Compiled and modified by the authors based on published regional geological data.
Figure 1. Structural–tectonic framework of the southern Pre-Caspian Basin showing the major structural units, fault systems, salt domes, hydrocarbon migration pathways, and locations of the studied oil fields. Compiled and modified by the authors based on published regional geological data.
Energies 19 03254 g001
Figure 2. Workflow of sample preparation for geochemical analysis.
Figure 2. Workflow of sample preparation for geochemical analysis.
Energies 19 03254 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation and operating principle of the dual-FID LTM-MD-GC system.
Figure 3. Schematic representation and operating principle of the dual-FID LTM-MD-GC system.
Energies 19 03254 g003
Figure 4. Molecular structures of diagnostic aromatic compounds used for oil fingerprinting.
Figure 4. Molecular structures of diagnostic aromatic compounds used for oil fingerprinting.
Energies 19 03254 g004
Figure 5. Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectrometric detector (GC–MS).
Figure 5. Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectrometric detector (GC–MS).
Energies 19 03254 g005
Figure 6. Conceptual model of hydrocarbon migration, reservoir filling, and oil fingerprinting results. Green arrows indicate interpreted hydrocarbon migration pathways; pink areas represent hydrocarbon-bearing structures; dashed black lines indicate interpreted pressure boundaries. Colored lines in the radar plots represent oil fingerprinting profiles of individual oil fields.
Figure 6. Conceptual model of hydrocarbon migration, reservoir filling, and oil fingerprinting results. Green arrows indicate interpreted hydrocarbon migration pathways; pink areas represent hydrocarbon-bearing structures; dashed black lines indicate interpreted pressure boundaries. Colored lines in the radar plots represent oil fingerprinting profiles of individual oil fields.
Energies 19 03254 g006
Figure 7. Chromatogram and results of oil fingerprinting (LTM-MD-GC).
Figure 7. Chromatogram and results of oil fingerprinting (LTM-MD-GC).
Energies 19 03254 g007
Figure 8. Oil fingerprinting presented as “radar” (spider) diagrams for fields of the Karaton–Tengiz uplift.
Figure 8. Oil fingerprinting presented as “radar” (spider) diagrams for fields of the Karaton–Tengiz uplift.
Energies 19 03254 g008
Figure 9. Oil fingerprinting of fields associated with individual domes of the Biikzhal uplift.
Figure 9. Oil fingerprinting of fields associated with individual domes of the Biikzhal uplift.
Energies 19 03254 g009
Figure 10. Oil fingerprinting of fields associated with the North Caspian uplift.
Figure 10. Oil fingerprinting of fields associated with the North Caspian uplift.
Energies 19 03254 g010
Figure 11. Sterane C27–C28–C29 ternary diagram of oils.
Figure 11. Sterane C27–C28–C29 ternary diagram of oils.
Energies 19 03254 g011
Figure 12. Mass fragmentogram of terpanes (m/z 191) for Akkuduk-21 and Kisimbay-16A fields.
Figure 12. Mass fragmentogram of terpanes (m/z 191) for Akkuduk-21 and Kisimbay-16A fields.
Energies 19 03254 g012
Figure 13. Sterane isomerization and m/z 217 sterane mass fragmentogram of representative oils S. Nurzhanov-700 and S. Nurzhanov-653.
Figure 13. Sterane isomerization and m/z 217 sterane mass fragmentogram of representative oils S. Nurzhanov-700 and S. Nurzhanov-653.
Energies 19 03254 g013
Figure 14. Relationship between sterane isomer ratios.
Figure 14. Relationship between sterane isomer ratios.
Energies 19 03254 g014
Figure 15. (A) m/z 191 mass chromatograms of the Alkuduk-21 and Kalinobal-16A crude oil samples illustrating differences in thermal maturity. (B) Structural relationship between Tm (17α,22,29,30-trisnorhopane) and Ts (18α,22,29,30-trisnorhopane) biomarkers showing the increase in thermal maturity with increasing Ts abundance.
Figure 15. (A) m/z 191 mass chromatograms of the Alkuduk-21 and Kalinobal-16A crude oil samples illustrating differences in thermal maturity. (B) Structural relationship between Tm (17α,22,29,30-trisnorhopane) and Ts (18α,22,29,30-trisnorhopane) biomarkers showing the increase in thermal maturity with increasing Ts abundance.
Energies 19 03254 g015
Figure 16. Relationship between Ts/Tm ratios in terpanes.
Figure 16. Relationship between Ts/Tm ratios in terpanes.
Energies 19 03254 g016
Figure 17. Relationship between 4/1 MDBT and methylphenanthrene index in oils.
Figure 17. Relationship between 4/1 MDBT and methylphenanthrene index in oils.
Energies 19 03254 g017
Figure 18. Parameters used for genetic correlation of samples and their distribution trends.
Figure 18. Parameters used for genetic correlation of samples and their distribution trends.
Energies 19 03254 g018
Figure 19. PCA of oils.
Figure 19. PCA of oils.
Energies 19 03254 g019
Figure 20. Oil family dendrogram (Malcom software, Version 5.0).
Figure 20. Oil family dendrogram (Malcom software, Version 5.0).
Energies 19 03254 g020
Figure 21. SIM mass fragmentograms (m/z 217) of steranes illustrating the distribution of C27–C29 steranes in representative crude oil samples.
Figure 21. SIM mass fragmentograms (m/z 217) of steranes illustrating the distribution of C27–C29 steranes in representative crude oil samples.
Energies 19 03254 g021
Figure 22. Relative distributions of C27–C29 steranes used for genetic classification and comparison of crude oils from the studied fields.
Figure 22. Relative distributions of C27–C29 steranes used for genetic classification and comparison of crude oils from the studied fields.
Energies 19 03254 g022
Figure 23. SIM mass fragmentograms of terpanes for visual comparison.
Figure 23. SIM mass fragmentograms of terpanes for visual comparison.
Energies 19 03254 g023
Figure 24. Terpane mass fragmentograms of oils in SIM mode for visual comparison.
Figure 24. Terpane mass fragmentograms of oils in SIM mode for visual comparison.
Energies 19 03254 g024
Figure 25. Mass fragmentograms of dibenzothiophene, phenanthrene, methyldibenzothiophene, and methylphenanthrenes in representative oil samples (Part I).
Figure 25. Mass fragmentograms of dibenzothiophene, phenanthrene, methyldibenzothiophene, and methylphenanthrenes in representative oil samples (Part I).
Energies 19 03254 g025
Figure 26. Mass fragmentograms of dibenzothiophene, phenanthrene, methyldibenzothiophene, and methylphenanthrenes in representative oil samples (Part II).
Figure 26. Mass fragmentograms of dibenzothiophene, phenanthrene, methyldibenzothiophene, and methylphenanthrenes in representative oil samples (Part II).
Energies 19 03254 g026
Table 1. Main physicochemical properties of the investigated crude oils.
Table 1. Main physicochemical properties of the investigated crude oils.
FieldDensity (kg/m3)Specific Gravity (g/cm3)Dynamic Viscosity (mPa·s)
Aktobe875–8830.875–0.88313.5–28.4
Dosmukhambetovskoye8720.87226.5
Eastern Saztyube830–8550.830–0.8556.0–12.0
Kalamkas833–8930.833–0.89315.6–31.0
Karaton8050.8052.0
Karasor885–9150.885–0.91535.0–85.0
Karazhanbas935–9440.935–0.944458–550 (up to 1200 under reservoir conditions)
Kashagan789–8200.789–0.8201.5–3.5
Kisimbay871–8810.871–0.88118.0–32.0
Korolevskoye800–8150.800–0.8152.0–3.0
Northern Nurzhanov886–8880.886–0.88816.6–33.1
Tengiz785–7890.785–0.7892.1
Teren-Uzyuk829–8360.829–0.8368.9–11.0
Western Elemes840–8600.840–0.8609.0–15.0
Western Prorva875–8830.875–0.88313.5–28.4
Table 2. Aromatic Compounds and ISTD Parameters for Oil Fingerprinting.
Table 2. Aromatic Compounds and ISTD Parameters for Oil Fingerprinting.
AbbreviationAromatic CompoundAbbreviationAromatic Compound
E BENZEthylbenzene4 ETOL4-Ethyltoluene
P XYLp-Xylene (1,4-dimethylbenzene)3 ETOL3-Ethyltoluene
M XYLm-Xylene (1,3-dimethylbenzene)135 TMB1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Mesitylene)
IP BENZIsopropylbenzene (Cumene)2 ETOL2-Ethyltoluene
O XYLo-Xylene (1,2-dimethylbenzene)124 TMB1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
NP BENZn-PropylbenzeneISTD5-Methyl-3-heptanone (internal standard)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhadyrassyn, S.; Riza, O.; Aigul, G.; Maral, K.; Gulya, I.; Saulet, S.; Nariman, S.; Ekaterina, B. Assessment of Hydrodynamic Connectivity and Compartmentalization of Petroleum Reservoirs Based on Oil Fingerprinting. Energies 2026, 19, 3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143254

AMA Style

Zhadyrassyn S, Riza O, Aigul G, Maral K, Gulya I, Saulet S, Nariman S, Ekaterina B. Assessment of Hydrodynamic Connectivity and Compartmentalization of Petroleum Reservoirs Based on Oil Fingerprinting. Energies. 2026; 19(14):3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhadyrassyn, Sarkulova, Orazbekova Riza, Gusmanova Aigul, Karazhanova Maral, Issengaliyeva Gulya, Shayakhmetov Saulet, Sarsenbekov Nariman, and Bazilevskaya Ekaterina. 2026. "Assessment of Hydrodynamic Connectivity and Compartmentalization of Petroleum Reservoirs Based on Oil Fingerprinting" Energies 19, no. 14: 3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143254

APA Style

Zhadyrassyn, S., Riza, O., Aigul, G., Maral, K., Gulya, I., Saulet, S., Nariman, S., & Ekaterina, B. (2026). Assessment of Hydrodynamic Connectivity and Compartmentalization of Petroleum Reservoirs Based on Oil Fingerprinting. Energies, 19(14), 3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop