Next Article in Journal
Magnetic Levitation Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Vibration Monitoring of Hydroelectric Units
Previous Article in Journal
Operation Optimization of Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping Stations via Virtual Power Plant and Carbon Trading
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pressure Change in a Duct with a Flow of a Homogeneous Gaseous Substance in the Presence of a Point Mass and Momentum Sink of Gas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

What Factors Drive the Spatiotemporal Differences in Coal Consumption in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China?

1
School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212000, China
2
Business School, Hohai University, Changzhou 231022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(10), 2342; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102342
Submission received: 12 April 2026 / Revised: 10 May 2026 / Accepted: 11 May 2026 / Published: 13 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Factor Analysis and Mathematical Modeling of Coals: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

The continuous combustion of coal releases carbon dioxide emissions, which has disrupted the Earth’s climate system and posed severe challenges to sustainable human development. As the world’s largest consumer of coal, China faces a critical challenge in curbing its dependence on this fuel. The Yangtze River Delta region, characterized by its advanced economy and high level of industrialization, accounts for a substantial share of the nation’s coal consumption. Therefore, identifying the driving factors of coal consumption changes in this region is essential for formulating targeted low-carbon transition policies. Based on panel data of the YRD region covering 2000 to 2022, this paper employs the LMDI method to decompose the changes in coal consumption from both production and residential sectors, with four driving factors for the production sector and three for the residential sector. The results show that the total coal consumption in the four provinces of the Yangtze River Delta region follows an inverted U-shaped trend, peaking in 2011, with an average annual growth rate of 4.75% before the peak and an annual decline rate of 4.64% after the peak. Production coal consumption accounts for an average of 96.2% of the region’s total consumption. The effect of production intensity and the effect of economic scale are respectively the main inhibitory and driving factors. Spatially, Shanghai was the only province with negative cumulative coal consumption growth, and its average gap with Anhui was the largest among all pairs. Finally, this paper puts forward targeted policy recommendations, focusing on improving coal utilization efficiency and strengthening inter-regional coordinated emission reduction.
Keywords: coal consumption; LMDI; spatiotemporal differences; Yangtze River Delta coal consumption; LMDI; spatiotemporal differences; Yangtze River Delta

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, R.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C. What Factors Drive the Spatiotemporal Differences in Coal Consumption in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China? Energies 2026, 19, 2342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102342

AMA Style

Cao R, Zhang C, Zhang C. What Factors Drive the Spatiotemporal Differences in Coal Consumption in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China? Energies. 2026; 19(10):2342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Rui, Chenjun Zhang, and Chengqi Zhang. 2026. "What Factors Drive the Spatiotemporal Differences in Coal Consumption in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China?" Energies 19, no. 10: 2342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102342

APA Style

Cao, R., Zhang, C., & Zhang, C. (2026). What Factors Drive the Spatiotemporal Differences in Coal Consumption in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China? Energies, 19(10), 2342. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop